DOCSLIB.ORG

And the Danube River (6) – 5 and 7 Shows Localities in the Vicinity (Downstream) of the Reopened Rock Fill

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
And the Danube River (6) – 5 and 7 Shows Localities in the Vicinity (Downstream) of the Reopened Rock Fill E1184 v. 2 Reduction of Nutrient Discharges Project Public Disclosure Authorized DDNP Component GEF # TF 051 289 Environmental Status Report (Environmental Assessment) Social Impact Assessment (Public Consultation) Final Report Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized VITUKI, Environmental and Water Management Research Centre VTK Innosystem Ltd Public Disclosure Authorized List of acronyms CTI County Traffic Inspectorate DEIA Detailed Environmental Impact Assessment DDNP Duna Dráva National Park DTM Digital Terrain Model Environmental Protection, Nature Conservation and Water Management EPNCWMI Inspectorate EPWMD Environmental Protection and Water Management Directorate FAVI Environmental Register of Subsurface Waters and Geological Media PHA Public Health Authority PHSCS Plant Health and Soil Conservation Station RA Recommended Alternative KAR Basic Environmental Register KÁRINFO Damage Elimination Information System KBIR Information System of Environmental Safety KÖFE Environmental Inspectorate KÖVIZIG Environmental, Nature Protection and Water Management Directorate KSH Central Bureau of Statistics KvVM Ministry for the Environment and Water Management MAHAB Hungarian Hydrological Database NGO Non-Governmental Organization NPI National Park Directorate OKIR National Environmental Information System OKKP National Environmental Damage Elimination Programme OTAR Basic Data and Object Handling System PEIA Preliminarily Environmental Impact Assessment SATIR Hydrological Data Processing, Storage and Information System SFSRD State Forestry Service Regional Directorate VIFE Inspectorate for Water VIFIR Hydrogeological Information System VIKÁR Information for Water Quality Damage-fighting VIR Damage-fighting Information System VIZIR Information System for Water Management VM Water Quality Database WFD Water Framework Directive Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 6 2. Description of the Gemenc and Béda-Karapancsa regions.............................................. 8 2.1 Abiotic environment............................................................................................... 8 2.1.1 Topography and geology ................................................................................ 8 2.1.2 Surface water hydrology............................................................................... 11 2.1.3 Surface water quality .................................................................................... 15 2.1.4 Sources of nutrients ...................................................................................... 18 2.2 Biotic environment............................................................................................... 22 2.2.1 Terrestrial Flora............................................................................................ 23 2.2.2 Terrestrial Fauna........................................................................................... 24 2.2.3 Aquatic flora................................................................................................. 25 2.2.4 Aquatic fauna ............................................................................................... 27 2.2.5 Conclusions.................................................................................................. 31 2.3 Socio-economic environment ............................................................................... 31 2.3.1 Legal framework .......................................................................................... 32 2.3.2 Water management....................................................................................... 32 2.3.3 Environmental management.......................................................................... 33 2.3.4 Nature conservation...................................................................................... 33 2.3.5 Local Governments....................................................................................... 34 2.3.6 Economic activities....................................................................................... 34 2.3.7 Recreation and tourism ................................................................................. 36 2.4 Review of pressures and problems........................................................................ 39 2.4.1 Environmental pressures and impacts............................................................ 39 2.4.2 Socio-economic pressures and impacts ......................................................... 39 3. Preliminary assessment of environmental impacts........................................................ 52 3.1 Veránka – Rezéti-Duna ........................................................................................ 54 3.2 Buvat.................................................................................................................... 55 3.3 Béda-Karapancsa.................................................................................................. 55 3.4 Sió unit................................................................................................................. 56 3.5 Gemenc................................................................................................................ 56 3.6 Báta-Duna............................................................................................................ 57 3.7 Fekete erd , Grébeci-Duna................................................................................... 59 3.8 Kerül -Duna ........................................................................................................ 60 3.9 Báli ...................................................................................................................... 61 3.10 Móric-Duna.......................................................................................................... 62 3.11 Nagy-Pandúr ........................................................................................................ 63 3.12 Qualitative investigation of dredging masses ........................................................ 63 3.13 Calculation of nutrient load reduction................................................................... 69 4. Preliminary assessment of socio-economic impacts...................................................... 72 4.1 Veránka – Rezéti-Duna ........................................................................................ 73 4.2 Buvat.................................................................................................................... 74 4.3 Béda-Karapancsa.................................................................................................. 74 4.4 Sió unit................................................................................................................. 75 4.5 Gemenc................................................................................................................ 76 4.6 Bátai-Duna........................................................................................................... 76 4.7 Fekete-erd – Grébeci-Duna................................................................................. 77 4.8 Kerül -Duna ........................................................................................................ 78 4.9 Báli ...................................................................................................................... 79 4.10 Móric-Duna.......................................................................................................... 79 4.11 Nagy-Pandúr ........................................................................................................ 80 5. Comparative evaluation................................................................................................ 81 6. Environmental Management Plan (EMP) ..................................................................... 86 6.1 Construction phase plan........................................................................................ 86 6.2 Implementation of mitigation measures ................................................................ 88 6.3 Monitoring requirements ...................................................................................... 93 6.4 Cost of environmental management plan .............................................................. 94 6.5 Institutional arrangements .................................................................................... 94 7. Proposal for the development of the monitoring programme ........................................ 94 7.1 The present Hungarian practice of monitoring ...................................................... 94 7.1.1 Quantitative monitoring of surface and subsurface waters............................. 95 7.1.2 Data bases of pollution sources and dischargers............................................ 95 7.2 The expectable future regulation, the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC).. 96 7.3 Local characteristics............................................................................................. 98 7.4 Review of deficiencies and needs ......................................................................... 98 7.5 Proposals.............................................................................................................. 99 References........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Act Cciii of 2011 on the Elections of Members Of
    Strasbourg, 15 March 2012 CDL-REF(2012)003 Opinion No. 662 / 2012 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ACT CCIII OF 2011 ON THE ELECTIONS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT OF HUNGARY This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-REF(2012)003 - 2 - The Parliament - relying on Hungary’s legislative traditions based on popular representation; - guaranteeing that in Hungary the source of public power shall be the people, which shall pri- marily exercise its power through its elected representatives in elections which shall ensure the free expression of the will of voters; - ensuring the right of voters to universal and equal suffrage as well as to direct and secret bal- lot; - considering that political parties shall contribute to creating and expressing the will of the peo- ple; - recognising that the nationalities living in Hungary shall be constituent parts of the State and shall have the right ensured by the Fundamental Law to take part in the work of Parliament; - guaranteeing furthermore that Hungarian citizens living beyond the borders of Hungary shall be a part of the political community; in order to enforce the Fundamental Law, pursuant to Article XXIII, Subsections (1), (4) and (6), and to Article 2, Subsections (1) and (2) of the Fundamental Law, hereby passes the following Act on the substantive rules for the elections of Hungary’s Members of Parliament: 1. Interpretive provisions Section 1 For the purposes of this Act: Residence: the residence defined by the Act on the Registration of the Personal Data and Resi- dence of Citizens; in the case of citizens without residence, their current addresses.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary's National Energy Efficiency Action Plan Until 2020
    Hungary’s National Energy Efficiency Action Plan until 2020 Mandatory reporting under Article 24(2) of Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on energy efficiency August 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................... 5 1.1 Hungary’s economic situation, influencing factors ..................................................... 6 1.2. Energy policy ............................................................................................................... 9 2. OVERVIEW OF NATIONAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY TARGETS AND SAVINGS 14 2.1 Indicative national 2020 energy efficiency target ..................................................... 14 2.2 Method of calculation ................................................................................................ 15 2.3 Overall primary energy consumption in 2020 and values by specific industries ...... 18 2.4 Final energy savings .................................................................................................. 19 3. POLICY MEASURES IMPLEMENTING EED ............................................................. 21 3.1 Horizontal measures .................................................................................................. 21 3.1.1
    [Show full text]
  • Kalmár Ádám – Results of the Joint Operations
    Results of the Joint Operations and trainings working group Danube Commission 15. February 2017. Budapest Ádám KALMÁR pol. Lt. Colonel Head of Division Baranya County Police Headquarters Objectives of the working group plan and organize 3 joint operations on the Danube during 2014 elaborate operation plans – (FOP with annexes and national SOP’s) work out and apply the uniform data exchange form for statistics synchronize the joint law enforcement operations in 10 countries run the Temporary Coordination Centre in Mohács, Hungary at the SEB contribute to the more exact analysis and evaluation of law enforcement risks in inland shipping with producing a joint Danube risk analysis material – the DARIF Risk Analyses Chart evaluate the operations completed and draw the conclusions, come to an arrangement with the partners about necessary changes summarize the results of joint operations, supply data to the law enforcement bodies of the participating countries make recommendations on the possibilities of similar joint operations and trainings in the future Page 33 Thematic meetings of the working group . Three thematic workshops were held during the project with 10-15 experts in the team of working group . Experts delegated from Each DARIF state, EU Agencies such as Europol, FRONTEX, Aquapol and the EU Border Assistance Mission (EUBAM) in Moldova and Ukraine . They had experiences in the areas of organising and synchronizing joint law enforcement operations and actions. Summary of the technical workshops: • Joint Operations (JO’s) should be multi-purpose operations • JO’s should focus on documents of seamen, illegal immigration, searching of ships but also to tackle against environmental pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • PAKS II PROJECT to BOOST ECONOMIC GROWTH.Pdf
    PAKS II PROJECT TO BOOST ECONOMIC GROWTH The construction of two new units for the Paks Nuclear Power Plant is the project of the century. The project may create a significant number of jobs at a number of manufacturing and service companies, as well as in education through the required training of fresh professional graduates, thereby providing a livelihood for several tens of thousands of people. The identification of potential domestic suppliers and subcontractors has begun. Nearly 400 companies have come forward so far in order to contribute to the up to 40% proportion of domestic suppliers. More than three-quarters of the population support the already operational nuclear power plant, and the managers of the identified domestic companies unanimously support the establishment of the new units. Operating with the support of more than three-quarters of the population, the Paks Nuclear Power Plant is the most marketable electricity generator in Hungary today, accounts for more than half the electricity generated in Hungary, and helps keep the price of electricity at an affordable level. At the Paks Nuclear Power Plant, the quantity of electricity generated since its connection to the grid has recently reached 400 TWh, which corresponds to the electricity used by the whole Hungarian population over a period of 35 years. The electricity generated at the nuclear power plant is by far the cheapest in Hungary, and this will remain so with the units to be newly constructed. ‘In connection with the establishment of the new units, the Russian party has undertaken to guarantee local content of up to 40%,’ said Mrs Lászlóné Németh, Minister for National Development.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Alberta
    University of Alberta Making Magyars, Creating Hungary: András Fáy, István Bezerédj and Ödön Beöthy’s Reform-Era Contributions to the Development of Hungarian Civil Society by Eva Margaret Bodnar A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Department of History and Classics © Eva Margaret Bodnar Spring 2011 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. Abstract The relationship between magyarization and Hungarian civil society during the reform era of Hungarian history (1790-1848) is the subject of this dissertation. This thesis examines the cultural and political activities of three liberal oppositional nobles: András Fáy (1786-1864), István Bezerédj (1796-1856) and Ödön Beöthy (1796-1854). These three men were chosen as the basis of this study because of their commitment to a two- pronged approach to politics: they advocated greater cultural magyarization in the multiethnic Hungarian Kingdom and campaigned to extend the protection of the Hungarian constitution to segments of the non-aristocratic portion of the Hungarian population.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practice in Hungary – Energy Efficient Cities
    BEST PRACTICE IN HUNGARY – ENERGY EFFICIENT CITIES BASIC INFORMATION Title of the Best Practice: Construction of the “Boiling Point Energy House”, Paks, Tolna, Hungary Energy efficiency measures implemented in the building: The building was constructed using traditional materials, such as adobe, which when used correctly, can reduce cooling and heating demand. A mobile hull was installed to increase insulation in cold weather and to decrease cooling demand; that also effect solar exposure. Geothermal probes and water-source heat pumps are also installed. Location: City: Paks Region: Tolna County, South Transdanubia Country: Hungary GoogleMaps link: https://goo.gl/maps/D53TWNvCpPF2 Partners involved: - Prof. Dr. habil István Kistelegdi DLA, PhD; H-7624 Pécs, Ifjúság str. 20, Room A-114 (János Szentágothai Research Centre), web: https://energiadesign.hu/en; planner - Active Energy Association (www.forraspontpaks.hu, H-7030 Paks, Elkerülő str. 4852/1), investor and applicant Implementation year: 2017 Photos: Source: http://epa.oszk.hu/02900/02971/00027/pdf/EPA02971_octogon_2017_1_056-061.pdf SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS Brief Description: The aim of the investment was to provide an example of a building which can adapt to the outer circumstances, such as temperature, solar exposure, humidity, ventilation, etc. by a mobile outer shell moved by a pulley system. The Energy House was built using traditional “adobe” bricks and a monolithic concrete structure, therefore it can exploit the advantages of said brick, which are improved humidity control
    [Show full text]
  • AMAZON of EUROPE BIKE TRAIL Output 3.1 Socio-Economic Analysis of Tourism Potentials
    AMAZON OF EUROPE BIKE TRAIL Output 3.1 Socio-economic analysis of tourism potentials Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA) DTP2-002-2.2 AOE BIKE TRAIL Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA) Project AoE Bike Trail, DTP2-002-2.2 Work package: WP3: Product development Output Output 3.1 Socio-economic analysis of tourism potentials Authors Anja Krajnik, Urška Dolinar, Tatjana Marn Institution Iskriva, Institute for Development of Local Potentials Date April 2019 Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA) Acknowledgment We would like to thank all participants who actively contributed with their inputs and comments during preparation of the Socio-economic analysis of tourism potentials of the Amazon of Europe area: Municipality of Velika Polana (Damijan Jaklin, Nina Lebar) WWF Austria (Stefanie Edelmüller, Arno Mohl) Trail Angels (Günter Mussnig, Rudi Trinko) Tourism Association Bad Radkersburg (Belinda Schagerl-Poandl, Christian Contola) Tourism Board Međimurje (Petra Murković, Iva Vurušić Mađarić, Rudi Grula) Public instituton for nature protection of Virovitca-Podravina County (Tatjana Arnold Sabo, Sabina Hranic, Antun Damjan) Public Institution County Development Agency of Osijek-Baranja County (Adela Sadiković, Ivana Kišćinal) Koprivnica Križevci County (Vladimir Šadek, Emilija Cvelber, Snježana Babok Grgić) WWF Adria (Ivana Korn Varga, Ana Kuzmanić, Lana Jurić) West-Pannon RDA Ltd. (Ádám Bolyós, Máté Deák, Tibor Polgár, Bejczy Delinke) Balaton-felvidéki Natonal Park Directorate (Csaba
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Differences in Land Use in Hungary
    DOI: 10.2478/vjbsd-2018-0003 1/2018 Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development 11 REGIONAL DIFFERENCES IN LAND USE IN HUNGARY Norbert Bozsik*, Gábor Koncz Eszterházy Károly University, Károly Róbert Campus, Gyöngyös, Hungary In the last decades, the area of agricultural land has been declined permanently in Hungary. Despite the diminishing production area, Hungary is among the leaders in terms of the proportion of agricultural land to the total area in the European Union. There are several reasons of using the arable land. As other economic sectors have gained a greater role in the production of GDP and employment, they have taken a larger area from agriculture. Real estate and infrastructure developments were justified by raising the standard of living of the population. The soil, nature, landscape and water protection aspects were also involved. In Hungary, the arable land is the most important natural resource, so it is very important to protect it. In our study, we examine the changes of arable land and uncultivated area in Hungary based on secondary databases of the Hungarian Central Statistical Office and departments of the Ministry of Agriculture. In the course of the research we focused on regional disparities. Keywords: arable land, non-agricultural land use, land protection, regional disparities The land is the resource of agricultural production. Land assets have important features, slope and climatic conditions are all good for agricultural production, characteristics: scarcity (land exists only in fixed amounts), immobility, and although there are significant regional differences (Birkás et al., 2012). durability. Land is a part of the national wealth and it must be used in profitable In 2016, the utilized agricultural area was 5.43 million ha and 1.94 million and sustainable way (Magda and Szűcs, 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • PROFECY – Processes, Features and Cycles of Inner Peripheries in Europe
    PROFECY – Processes, Features and Cycles of Inner Peripheries in Europe (Inner Peripheries: National territories facing challenges of access to basic services of general interest) Applied Research Final Report Annex 12 Case Study Report Tamási járás (Hungary) Version 07/12/2017 This report is one of the deliverables of the PROFECY project. This Applied Research Project is conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The ESPON EGTC is the Single Beneficiary of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. The Single Operation within the programme is implemented by the ESPON EGTC and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund, the EU Member States and the Partner States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. This delivery does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the ESPON 2020 Monitoring Committee. Authors Katalin Kovács, Gergely Tagai, MTA KRTK (Hungary) Krisztina Magócs, Lechner Knowledge Center (Hungary) Advisory Group Project Support Team: Barbara Acreman and Zaira Piazza (Italy), Eedi Sepp (Estonia), Zsolt Szokolai, European Commission. ESPON EGTC: Marjan van Herwijnen (Project Expert), Laurent Frideres (HoU E&O), Ilona Raugze (Director), Piera Petruzzi (Outreach), Johannes Kiersch (Financial Expert). Acknowledgements Annamária Uzzoli, MTA KRTK (Hungary), Anna Hamar, MTA KRTK (Hungary) Information on ESPON and its projects can be found on www.espon.eu. The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. This delivery exists only in an electronic version. © ESPON, 2017 Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON EGTC in Luxembourg.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Reform and the Hungarian Peasantry C. 1700-1848
    Land Reform and the Hungarian Peasantry c. 1700-1848 Robert William Benjamin Gray UCL Thesis submitted for a PhD in History, 2009 1 I, Robert William Benjamin Gray, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 25th September 2009 2 Abstract This thesis examines the nature of lord-peasant relations in the final stages of Hungarian seigneurialism, dating roughly from 1700 to the emancipation of the peasantry in 1848. It investigates how the terms of the peasants’ relations with their lords, especially their obligations and the rights to the land they farmed, were established, both through written law and by customary practice. It also examines how the reforms of this period sought to redefine lord-peasant relations and rights to landed property. Under Maria Theresa land reform had been a means to protect the rural status quo and the livelihood of the peasantry: by the end of the 1840s it had become an integral part of a liberal reform movement aiming at the complete overhaul of Hungary’s ‘feudal’ social and economic system. In this period the status of the peasantry underpinned all attempts at reform. All reforms were claimed to be in the best interests of the peasantry, yet none stemmed from the peasants themselves. Conversely, the peasantry had means to voice their grievances through petitions and recourse to the courts, and took the opportunity provided by the reforms to reassert their rights and renegotiate the terms of their relations to their landlords.
    [Show full text]
  • Calvary of the Germans in Hungary at the End of WWII Eleonóra MATKOVITS-KRETZ National Circle from Pécs-Baranya of the Germans of Hungary
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS SAPIENTIAE, EUROPEAN AND REGIONAL STUDIES, 7 (2015) 51–59 DOI: 10.1515/auseur-2015-0005 Calvary of the Germans in Hungary at the end of WWII Eleonóra MATKOVITS-KRETZ National Circle from Pécs-Baranya of the Germans of Hungary Abstract. The German community in Hungary suffered many blows at the end of World War II and after it, on the basis of collective guilt. Immediately after the Red Army had marched in, gathering and deportation started into the camps of the Soviet Union, primarily into forced-labour camps in Donetsk, the Caucasus, and the Ural mountains. One third of them never RETURNED4HOSELEFTBEHINDHADTOFACEFORCEDRESETTLEMENT THECONlSCATION of their properties, and other ordeals. Their history was a taboo subject until the change of the political system in 1989. Not even until our days, by the 70th anniversary of the events, has their story reached a worthy place in national and international remembrance. International collaboration, the establishment of a research institute is needed to set to rights in history the story of the ordeal of the German community after World War II, for the present and future generations. Keywords: Malenkey robot, Soviet lager, deportation, labour camp, prisoners of war, relocation, collective guilt, Swabian Holocaust, Germans from Hungary, forced migration Mission of the Association Pécs-Baranya Ethnic Circle of Germans in Hungary Our association was founded in 1991. Its main aim is the representation of interests and the research of the true history of the German national minorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Településrendezési Terv Örökségvédelmi
    HARTA TELEPÜLÉSRENDEZÉSI TERV ÖRÖKSÉGVÉDELMI HATÁSTANULMÁNY RÉGÉSZETI MUNKARÉSZ KUSTÁR ROZÁLIA régész – muzeológus régészeti örökségvédelmi és muzeológiai szakértő 2018. augusztus TARTALOM I. Bevezető II. Harta közigazgatási területének régészeti kutatása II. 1. Régészeti lelőhelyek Harta területén II.2. Régészeti érdekű területek Harta közigazgatási határában II. 3. Régészeti lelőhelyek Harta területén - Történeti áttekintés III. A településrendezési tervben előirányzott változtatások régészeti vonatkozásai és örökségvédelmi javaslattétel IV. Harta közigazgatási határában lévő régészeti lelőhelyek megóvása - összefoglalás V. Irodalmi hivatkozások VI. Nyilatkozat MELLÉKLETEK 1. Nyilvántartott régészeti lelőhelyek Harta bel- és külterületén 2. Régészeti lelőhelyek Harta bel- és külterületén - térképdokumentáció 3. Régészeti lelőhelyek Harta bel- és külterületén - fotódokumentáció 4. Archív térképek 5. Ismert régészeti lelőhelyek Harta határában - áttekintő tábla I. BEVEZETŐ A régészeti lelőhelyek és a műemlékek kulturális, történeti környezetünk részei, ezért a terület-, település- és tájfejlesztéssel valamint a terület- és településrendezéssel kapcsolatos beruházások tervezését a kulturális örökség védelmével összhangban kell végezni. A településfejlesztési koncepció, a településrendezési tervek és a helyi építési szabályzat elkészítésénél, ill. módosításánál a kulturális örökség védelméről szóló, többször módosított 2001. évi LXIV. törvény (a továbbiakban: Kötv.) előírásait kell figyelembe venni, amelynek hatálya a műemlékekre és a régészeti
    [Show full text]