DOCSLIB.ORG

NOÛS Nihil Philosophici a Nobis Alienum Putamus March 1976

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NOÛS Nihil Philosophici a Nobis Alienum Putamus March 1976 NOÛS Nihil philosophici a nobis alienum putamus March 1976. Volume X. Number 1. Margaret Wilson. “Descartes: The Epistemological Argument for Mind-Body Distinctness”. Noûs. March 1976. Volume X. Number 1. PP 3-18. David Shwayder. “On the Identification of Bodies”. Noûs. March 1976. Volume X. Number 1. PP 19-34. Zeno Vendler. “Thinking of Individuals”. Noûs. March 1976. Volume X. Number 1. PP 35- 46. William Earle. “The Phenomenological Verification of Mystical Claims (Abstract)”. Noûs. March 1976. Volume X. Number 1. PP 47-48. Kendall Walton. “Points of View in Narrative and Depictive Representation”. Noûs. March 1976. Volume X. Number 1. PP 49-64. Robert Stalnaker. “Possible Worlds”. Noûs. March 1976. Volume X. Number 1. PP 65-76. Allan Gibbard. “Natural Property Rights”. Noûs. March 1976. Volume X. Number 1. PP 77-88. NOÛS Nihil philosophici a nobis alienum putamus May 1976. Volume X. Number 2. David Lyons. “Mill’s Theory Morality”. Noûs. May 1976. Volume X. Number 2. PP 101- 120. Lars Bersgström. “On the Formulation and Application of Utilitarianism”. Noûs. May 1976. Volume X. Number 2. PP 121-144. L. S. Sumner. “A Matter of Life and Death”. Noûs. May 1976. Volume X. Number 2. PP 145-172. Jan Narveson. “Utilitarianism, Group Avtion, and Coordination”. Noûs. May 1976. Volume X. Number 2. PP 173-194. J. H. Sobel. “Utilitarianism and Past and Future Mistakes”. Noûs. May 1976. Volume X. Number 2. PP 195-220. Krister Segerberg. “A Neglected Family of Aggregatio Porblems in Ethics”. Noûs. May 1976. Volume X. Number 2. PP 221-244. NOÛS Nihil philosophici a nobis alienum putamus September 1976. Volume X. Number 3 Berent Enç. “Reference of Theoretical Terms”. Noûs. September 1976. Volume X. Number 3. PP 261-282. Richard B. Arnaud. “Sentence, Utterance, and Samesayer”. Noûs. September 1976. Volume X. Number 3. PP 283-304. Charles S. Chihara. “Truth, Meaning, and Paradox”. Noûs. September 1976. Volume X. Number 3. PP 305-312. David H. Sanford. “What Could Have Happened”. Noûs. September 1976. Volume X. Number 3. PP 313-326. Keith Lehrer. “When Rational Disagreement is Impossible”. Noûs. September 1976. Volume X. Number 3. PP 327-332. Robert L. Causey. “Identities and Reduction: A Reply”. Noûs. September 1976. Volume X. Number 3. PP 333-338. Critical Studies David Blumenfeld. “C. D. Broad: C. D. Broad’s Leibniz”. Noûs. September 1976. Volume X. Number 3. PP 339-344. Richard Rorty. “Milton Fisk: Necessity and Realism: Milton Fisk’s Nature and Necessity”. Noûs. September 1976. Volume X. Number 3. PP 345-354. Donald Dute. “David Lewis: David Lewis and the Analysis of Counterfactuals”. Noûs. September 1976. Volume X. Number 3. PP 355-361. NOÛS Nihil philosophici a nobis alienum putamus November 1976. Volume X. Number 4 “Instructions for Critical Studies”. Noûs. November 1976. Volume X. Number 4. PP 375 “Referees”. Noûs. November 1976. Volume X. Number 4. PP 376-377 “Cumulative Index of NOÛS, 1967-1976”. Noûs. November 1976. Volume X. Number 4. PP 378-438 NOÛS Nihil philosophici a nobis alienum putamus March 1977. Volume XI. Number 1 Norman Kretzmann. “Socrates is Whiter than Plato begins to be White”. Noûs. March 1977. Volume XI. Number 1. PP 3-16. Keith Lehrer. “The Knowledge Cycle”. Noûs. March 1977. Volume XI. Number 1. PP 17- 26. George I. Mavrodes. “The Life Everlasting and the Bodily Criterion of Identity”. Noûs. March 1977. Volume XI. Number 1. PP 27-40. Robert C. Solomon. “The Logic of Emotion”. Noûs. March 1977. Volume XI. Number 1. PP 41-50. Stephen Toulmin. “Epistemology and evelopmental Psychology”. Noûs. March 1977. Volume XI. Number 1. PP 51-54. Critical Reviews Paul D. Eisenberg. “Charles Taylor: Hegel”. Noûs. March 1977. Volume XI. Number 1. PP 55-60. George Nakhnikian. “William L. Rowe: The Cosmological Argument”. Noûs. March 1977. Volume XI. Number 1. PP 61-63. Paul Vincent Spade. “Augustine: De dialectica”. Noûs. March 1977. Volume XI. Number 1. PP 64-66. NOÛS Nihil philosophici a nobis alienum putamus May 1977. Volume XI. Number 2 Henry E. Kyburg, Jr. “A defense of Convenntionalism”. Noûs. May 1977. Volume XI. Number 2. PP 75-96. Tyler Burge. “A Theory of Aggregates”. Noûs. May 1977. Volume XI. Number 2. PP 97- 118. Robert Weingard. “Space-Time and the Direction of Time”. Noûs. May 1977. Volume XI. Number 2. PP 119-132. Michael Jubien. “Ontology and Mathematical Truth”. Noûs. May 1977. Volume XI. Number 2. PP 133-150. Jerome Gellman. “The Meta-philosophy of Religious Language”. Noûs. May 1977. Volume XI. Number 2. PP 151-162. Richard E. Grandy. “Predication and Singular Terms”. Noûs. May 1977. Volume XI. Number 2. PP 163-168. Ronald Scales. “A Russellian Approach to Truth”. Noûs. May 1977. Volume XI. Number 2. PP 169-174. Critical Study Robert M. Adams. “A. Plantinga: The Nature of Necessity”. Noûs. May 1977. Volume XI. Number 2. PP 175-191. NOÛS Nihil philosophici a nobis alienum putamus Septembre 1977. Volume XI. Number 3 John Earman. “How to talk about the Topology of Time”. Noûs. Septembre 1977. Volume XI. Number 3. PP 211-226. Clark Glymour. “The Epistemology of Geometry”. Noûs. Septembre 1977. Volume XI. Number 3. PP 227-252. Wesley Salmon. “The Philosophical Significance of the One-Way Speed of Light”. Noûs. Septembre 1977. Volume XI. Number 3. PP 253-292. David Malament. “Causal Theories of Time and the Conventionality of Simultaneity”. Noûs. Septembre 1977. Volume XI. Number 3. PP 293-300. NOÛS Nihil philosophici a nobis alienum putamus November 1977. Volume XI. Number 4 Geoffrey Hellman and Frank Wilson Thompson. “Physicalist Materialism”. Noûs. November 1977. Volume XI. Number 4. PP 309-346. Richard Cole. “Causes and Explanation”. Noûs. November 1977. Volume XI. Number 4. PP 347-374. Peter van Inwagen. “Ontological Arguments”. Noûs. November 1977. Volume XI. Number 4. PP 375-396. Alan P. Brinton. “Definite Descriptions and Context-Dependence”. Noûs. November 1977. Volume XI. Number 4. PP 397-408. Cahrles F. Kielkopf. “There Is No Really Rigid Designation”. Noûs. November 1977. Volume XI. Number 4. PP 409-416. Nelson Pike. “If There Is No Necessary Being, Nothing Exists”. Noûs. November 1977. Volume XI. Number 4. PP 417-420. Critical Reviews Ernest Sosa. “Gilbert Harman: Gilbert Harman’s Thought”. Noûs. November 1977. Volume XI. Number 4. PP 421-430. Mark Pastin. “Keith Lehrer: Keith Lehrer’s Knowledge”. Noûs. November 1977. Volume XI. Number 4. PP 431-437. NOÛS Nihil philosophici a nobis alienum putamus March 1978. Volume XII. Number 1 Monroe C. Beardsley. “Metaphorical Senses”. Noûs. March 1978. Volume XII. Number 1. PP 3-16. Mark Steiner. “Mathematics, Explanation, and Scientific Knowledge”. Noûs. March 1978. Volume XII. Number 1. PP 17-28. John A. Trentman. “Bad Names: A Linguistic Argument in Late Medieval Natural Law Theories”. Noûs. March 1978. Volume XII. Number 1. PP 29-40. N. L. Wilson. “Ontology and Genral Semantics/The Saturation of Dyspepsia”. Noûs. March 1978. Volume XII. Number 1. PP 41-52. Robert Nozick. “Knowledge and Skepticism (Abstract)/Abstract of submitted papers to be read at the Symposium”. Noûs. March 1978. Volume XII. Number 1. PP 54-68. Critical Reviews R. E. Freeman. “H. J. Skala: H. J. Skala’s Non-Archimedian Utility Theory”. Noûs. March 1978. Volume XII. Number 1. PP 69-72. Lawrence J. Jost. “Charles B. Daniells: Charles B. Daniells’ The Evalustion of Ethical Theories”. Noûs. March 1978. Volume XII. Number 1. PP 73-77. L. Nathan Oaklander and Richard Gull. “Solomon: Solomon on the Passions”. Noûs. March 1978. Volume XII. Number 1. PP 78-81. Paul Vincent Spade. “Michael J. Loux: Michael J. Loux’s Ockham’s Theory of Terms”. Noûs. March 1978. Volume XII. Number 1. PP 82-87. NOÛS Nihil philosophici a nobis alienum putamus May 1978. Volume XII. Number 2 James Cornman. “On the Certainty of Reports about What Is Given”. Noûs. May 1978. Volume XII. Number 2. PP 93-118. Philip Kitcher. “The Plight of the Platonist”. Noûs. May 1978. Volume XII. Number 2. PP 119-136. Terence Parsons. “Nuclear and Extranuclear Properites, Meinong, and Leibniz”. Noûs. May 1978. Volume XII. Number 2. PP 137-152. William J. Rapaport. “Meinongian Theories and a Russellian Paradox”. Noûs. May 1978. Volume XII. Number 2. PP 153-180. Romane Clark. “Not Every Object of Thought Has Being: A Paradox in Naive Predication Theory”. Noûs. May 1978. Volume XII. Number 2. PP 181-188. Hector Neri-Castañeda. “Philosophical Method and the Theory of Predication and Identity”. Noûs. May 1978. Volume XII. Number 2. PP 189-210. Critical Reviews Gary Gutting and Michael Loux. “Wilfrid Sellars: Wilfrid Sellars’ Essays in Philosophy and its History”. Noûs. May 1978. Volume XII. Number 2. PP 211-220. Douglas N. Husak. “Ted Honderich: Ted Honderich’s Political Violence”. Noûs. May 1978. Volume XII. Number 2. PP 221-224. NOÛS Nihil philosophici a nobis alienum putamus Septembre 1978. Volume XII. Number 3 Paul Meehl. “Precognitive Telepathy I”. Noûs. Septembre 1978. Volume XII. Number 3. PP 235-266. Stephen Braude. “Telepathy”. Noûs. Septembre 1978. Volume XII. Number 3. PP 267- 302. Russell Trenholme. “A Physicalist Analysis of Probability”. Noûs. Septembre 1978. Volume XII. Number 3. PP 303-316. Alan Goldman. “Visual Belief”. Noûs. Septembre 1978. Volume XII. Number 3. PP 317- 328. Hausman ans Foster. “Cartwright, Classes, and Criterial Difference”. Noûs. Septembre 1978. Volume XII. Number 3. PP 329-336. Critical Reviews John Tienson. “Stephen Stitch’s: Innate Ideas”. Noûs. Septembre 1978. Volume XII. Number 3. PP 337-344. Steven Böer. “John Heintz: John Heintz’ Subjects and Predicables”. Noûs. Septembre 1978. Volume XII. Number 3. PP 345-350. Robert Champigny. “Arthur Danto: Arthur Danto’s John-Paul Sartre”. Noûs. Septembre 1978. Volume XII. Number 3. PP 351-353. NOÛS Nihil philosophici a nobis alienum putamus November 1978.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Feminism & Philosophy Vol.5 No.1
    APA Newsletters Volume 05, Number 1 Fall 2005 NEWSLETTER ON FEMINISM AND PHILOSOPHY FROM THE EDITOR, SALLY J. SCHOLZ NEWS FROM THE COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF WOMEN, ROSEMARIE TONG ARTICLES MARILYN FISCHER “Feminism and the Art of Interpretation: Or, Reading the First Wave to Think about the Second and Third Waves” JENNIFER PURVIS “A ‘Time’ for Change: Negotiating the Space of a Third Wave Political Moment” LAURIE CALHOUN “Feminism is a Humanism” LOUISE ANTONY “When is Philosophy Feminist?” ANN FERGUSON “Is Feminist Philosophy Still Philosophy?” OFELIA SCHUTTE “Feminist Ethics and Transnational Injustice: Two Methodological Suggestions” JEFFREY A. GAUTHIER “Feminism and Philosophy: Getting It and Getting It Right” SARA BEARDSWORTH “A French Feminism” © 2005 by The American Philosophical Association ISSN: 1067-9464 BOOK REVIEWS Robin Fiore and Hilde Lindemann Nelson: Recognition, Responsibility, and Rights: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory REVIEWED BY CHRISTINE M. KOGGEL Diana Tietjens Meyers: Being Yourself: Essays on Identity, Action, and Social Life REVIEWED BY CHERYL L. HUGHES Beth Kiyoko Jamieson: Real Choices: Feminism, Freedom, and the Limits of the Law REVIEWED BY ZAHRA MEGHANI Alan Soble: The Philosophy of Sex: Contemporary Readings REVIEWED BY KATHRYN J. NORLOCK Penny Florence: Sexed Universals in Contemporary Art REVIEWED BY TANYA M. LOUGHEAD CONTRIBUTORS ANNOUNCEMENTS APA NEWSLETTER ON Feminism and Philosophy Sally J. Scholz, Editor Fall 2005 Volume 05, Number 1 objective claims, Beardsworth demonstrates Kristeva’s ROM THE DITOR “maternal feminine” as “an experience that binds experience F E to experience” and refuses to be “turned into an abstraction.” Both reconfigure the ground of moral theory by highlighting the cultural bias or particularity encompassed in claims of Feminism, like philosophy, can be done in a variety of different objectivity or universality.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the Santayana No
    Overheard in Seville bulletin of the Santayana No. 1 Fall 1983 OVERHEARD IN SEVILLE Bulletin of the Santayana Society NO. 1 FALL 1983 CONTENTS Table of Contents i Illustration ......... ... .......... ii Santayana^s Idea of the Tragic . .......... 1 On Grue and Bleen . 12 Announcement of Annual Meeting ........ 17 Bibliographic Update . 18 The Santayana Edition . 20 Edited for the Santayana Society by Angus Kerr-Lawson, Department of Pure Mathematics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L-3T2, and by Herman J. Saatkamp Jr., Department of Philosophy, University of Tampa, Tampa, Florida 33606. All communications should be sent to one of the editors. The bulletin will appear annually; it is formatted and composed for typesetting with Waterloo Script, and is printed by Graphic Services, University of Waterloo. 226 Ethicei Pan IV* punk, qui alter! injuriam fecit, eandcm civi indignari non dko, quia non Odio perdta ad perdendum civem, fed pietate mota ewi- dem punit. PROPOSITIO LH. Acquiefcentia in fe ipfo ex Ratione ortri pteft, et w fokf m- quicfcentia, qua ex Ratione oritur, fumma eft, qua pteft dari. DIMOMITIATIO, Acquiefcentia in fe ipfo eft Lsetitia orta ex eo, quod homo fe ipfum fuamque agendi potentiam contemplatur (per %$. JfeSt. Defn.). At vera hominis agendi potentia feu virtua eft ipia Ratio (per Prop. 3. p. $.), quam homo dare et diftinde contemplatur (per Prop. 40. et 43. p. a.); Ergo Acquiefcentia in fe ipfo ex Ratione oritur. Deinde nihil homo, dum fe ipfum contemplatur, clave et diftin&e, five adequate percipit, nifi ea, qua; ex ipfiui agendi po­ tentia fequuntur (per Befin. a. p. 3.), hoc eft (per Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Schriftenreihe Des Sophie Drinker Instituts Band 4
    Schriftenreihe des Sophie Drinker Instituts Herausgegeben von Freia Hoffmann Band 4 Marion Gerards, Freia Hoffmann (Hrsg.) Musik – Frauen – Gender Bücherverzeichnis 1780–2004 BIS-Verlag der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg 2006 Das Werk ist einschließlich aller seiner Teile urheberrechtlich ge- schützt. Jede Verwertung außerhalb der Grenzen des Urheberrechts bedarf der Zustimmung der Autorinnen. Dies gilt insbesondere für Vervielfältigungen, Übersetzungen, Mikroverfilmungen und die Einspeicherung und Verarbeitung in elektronischen Medien. © BIS-Verlag, Oldenburg 2006 Umschlaggestaltung: Marta Daul Layout und Satz: BIS-Verlag Verlag / Druck / BIS-Verlag Vertrieb: der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg Postfach 25 41, 26015 Oldenburg Tel.: 0441/798 2261, Telefax: 0441/798 4040 e-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.bis.uni-oldenburg.de ISBN 3-8142-0966-4 Inhaltsverzeichnis Vorwort 3 Hinweise zur Benutzung 5 1 Nachschlagewerke 9 1.1 Lexika und biographische Nachschlagewerke 9 1.2 Bibliographien 14 1.3 Notenverzeichnisse 17 1.4 Diskographien 22 2 Einführende Literatur 24 2.1 Kunstmusik 24 2.2 Populäre Musik (Jazz, Rock, Pop, Volksmusik, Chansons, Weltmusik u. ä.) 42 2.3 Stilübergreifend und Sonstige 50 3 Personenbezogene Darstellungen 54 3.1 Kunstmusik 54 3.2 Populäre Musik (Jazz, Rock, Pop, Volksmusik, Chansons, Weltmusik u. ä.) 320 3.3 Stilübergreifend und Sonstige 433 4 Spezielle Literatur 446 4.1 Kunstmusik 446 4.2 Populäre Musik (Jazz, Rock, Pop, Volksmusik, Chansons, Weltmusik u. ä.) 462 4.3 Stilübergreifend
    [Show full text]
  • In Medias Res Fall 2007 1 FEATURE STORIES
    INSIDE: COLLOQUIUM AND COMMUNICATIONS FOrum calendar In Medias Res cms.mit.edu • fall 2007 The Changing Face of CMS Introducing Nick Montfort and Erin Reilly CMS, Media Lab Launch Center for Future Civic Media C3 Hosts Futures of Entertainment 2 Conference Project New Media Literacies Tackles Moby-Dick The Education Arcade and NBC Announce iCue GAMBIT Unveils Six New Game Prototypes William Uricchio on the Future of Digital Heritage New Staff, New Faculty, New Visiting Scholars, and the Class of 2009 Dpnqbsbujwf .&%*" Tuvejft FALL 2007 1 from the directors 12 events 22 people, places, things Space: The Final Frontier CMS to Host 2007 Media CMS Welcomes New Staff Henry Jenkins and William Uricchio Literacy Conference and Additions Futures of Entertainment 2 2 feature stories 25 poem Project NML’s Erin Reilly 13 project updates From Kevin White and the Cyphibian Theory C3: Massively Multiplayer Ed Barrett Huma Yusuf Fandemonium! Joshua Green & Sam Ford 25 people, places, things 3 feature stories Faculty & Alumni Updates Location Scouting 14 project updates in Second Life The Education Arcade, 33 cms in the news Amanda Finkelberg NBC Announce iCue CMS Makes Headlines by Scot Osterweil Wrestling and Dancing 4 feature stories Preserving Our 15 project updates 34 people, places, things Digital Heritage Project NML Sends a Shout- CMS at the Movies William Uricchio Out to Mixed Magic Theater Generoso Fierro Anna van Someren & Kelly Leahy 6 feature stories I N S I D E : C O L L O Q U I U M A N D C O M M U N I C A T I O N S F O R U M C A L E N
    [Show full text]
  • A Socio-Economic Study of the Camorra Through Journalism
    A SOCIO-ECONOMIC STUDY OF THE CAMORRA THROUGH JOURNALISM, RELIGION AND FILM by ROBERT SHELTON BELLEW (under the direction of Thomas E. Peterson) ABSTRACT This dissertation is a socio-economic study of the Camorra as portrayed through Roberto Saviano‘s book Gomorra: Viaggio nell'impero economico e nel sogno di dominio della Camorra and Matteo Garrone‘s film, Gomorra. It is difficult to classify Saviano‘s book. Some scholars have labeled Gomorra a ―docufiction‖, suggesting that Saviano took poetic freedoms with his first-person triune accounts. He employs a prose and news reporting style to narrate the story of the Camorra exposing its territory and business connections. The crime organization is studied through Italian journalism, globalized economics, eschatology and neorealistic film. In addition to igniting a cultural debate, Saviano‘s book has fomented a scholarly consideration on the innovativeness of his narrative style. Wu Ming 1 and Alessandro Dal Lago epitomize the two opposing literary camps. Saviano was not yet a licensed reporter when he wrote the book. Unlike the tradition of news reporting in the United States, Italy does not have an established school for professional journalism instruction. In fact, the majority of Italy‘s leading journalists are writers or politicians by trade who have gravitated into the realm of news reporting. There is a heavy literary influence in Italian journalism that would be viewed as too biased for Anglo- American journalists. Yet, this style of writing has produced excellent material for a rich literary production that can be called engagé or political literature. A study of Gomorra will provide information about the impact of the book on current Italian journalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Concept of Love from Irving Singer's Perspective แนวคิดเรื่องความรักจากมุม
    วารสารปณิธาน Concept of Love from Irving Singer’s Perspective แนวคิดเรื่องความรักจากมุมมองของ เออร์วิง ซิงเกอร์ Suyada Channart1 สุญาดา ชาญนารถ Abstract The research on the concept of love from Irving Singer’s perspective is aimed at studying the types of love from several perspectives and the concept of love from Irving Singer’s perspective to find out what love is and how it relates to human beings. According to Irving Singer, pluralistic love is the best word to describe his concept of love. He rejected to define love in one definition. There are different kinds of love – the love of things, the love of persons and the love of ideals. He mainly focused on the analysis of romantic love and developed the distinction between bestowal and appraisal; the idea of interdependence rather than dependence. Love is both appraisal and bestowal. Love is an acceptance of another being, a sharing of selves and a contributor to meaning in life. It is hoped that this study will reflect how we love and how 1Master student of Master of Arts in Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Chiang Mai University. This paper is a part of the thesis of “Concept of Love from Irving Singer’s Perspective” which Dr.Christopher Fisher is an advisor and Dr.Phisit Kotsupho is an co-advisor. 160 ปีที ่ 13 ฉบับที่ 1 มกราคม - มิถุนายน 2560 to be loved in a more comprehensible way; which will be a guideline for people who are interested in studying or trying to understand the issues about love and other related social issues. This will lead to the creation of knowledge to strengthen people for living lives in a more creative and meaningful way.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Bergman: the Lived Experience of the Absence of God in Faithless and Saraband
    religions Article Late Bergman: The Lived Experience of the Absence of God in Faithless and Saraband Thomas Hibbs Honors College, Baylor University, 1301 S. University Parks Dr., Waco, TX 76798, USA; [email protected] Academic Editor: Joseph Kickasola Received: 2 June 2016; Accepted: 2 December 2016; Published: 15 December 2016 Abstract: Acclaimed as one of the great filmmakers of the 20th century, Ingmar Bergman is for many an arch-modernist, whose work is characterized by a high degree of self-conscious artistry and by dark, even nihilistic themes. Film critics increasingly identify him as a kind of philosopher of the human condition, especially of the dislocations and misery of the modern human condition. However, Bergman’s films are not embodiments of philosophical theories, nor do they include explicit discussions of theory. Instead, he attends to the concrete lived experience of those who, on the one hand, suffer from doubt, dislocation, and self-hatred and, on the other, long for confession and communion. In the middle of his career, especially in his famous faith trilogy of the early 1960s, Bergman investigated the lived experience of the absence of God. It is commonly thought that after this period, the question of God disappeared. However, in his last two films, Faithless and Saraband, Bergman explores the lived experience of the absence of God. Indeed, he moves beyond a simple negation to explore the complex interplay of absence. He even illustrates the possibility of a kind of communion for which so many of his characters—early, middle and late—long. Keywords: Ingmar Bergman; Saraband; Faithless; God; nihilism; communion; philosophy; film Of the mid-century work of the Swedish filmmaker Ingmar Bergman, Francois Truffaut stated in 1973, “there is no body of work of the caliber and integrity of Bergman’s since the war” ([1], p.
    [Show full text]
  • Narrative Delay and the Nature of Love in the Short Film, Come Walter C
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Articles Department of Cinema and Photography Spring 2011 Narrative Delay and the Nature of Love in the Short Film, Come Walter C. Metz Southern Illinois University Carbondale, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cp_articles Recommended Citation Metz, Walter C. "Narrative Delay and the Nature of Love in the Short Film, Come." Short Film Studies 2, No. 1 (Spring 2011): 113-116. doi:10.1386/sfs.2.1.113_1. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Cinema and Photography at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WALTER METZ Southern Illinois University Carbondale ABSTRACT By showing teenagers falling in love, and then cutting to the loving couple, now elderly, the short film Come brilliantly uses the excision of the narrative tradition of delay in order to revolutionize the cinema’s presentation of love in theoretical synchronicity with Irving Singer’s philosophical study, The Nature of Love. KEYWORDS philosophy of Love ageism cinema studies narrative theory Irving Singer Narrative Delay and the Nature of Love in Come In Reading for the Plot, theorist Peter Brooks suggests from a Freudian framework that storytelling is about delay, quickly stating a problem and then invoking schemes to keep it from being solved until the climax (Brooks 1992: 3). Hollywood feature-length cinema, based on Aristotle’s tripartite division of narrative (beginning, middle, and end), via the dominance of the Three-Act Structure script, is a prime exemplar of this storytelling tradition in our era (Aristotle 1961: 3).
    [Show full text]
  • On Love and Awareness Helmut Wautischer, Sonoma State University
    On Love and Awareness Helmut Wautischer, Sonoma State University Scholars organize their views on love by referring to teleological motives, idealistic romance, subject-object relations, ownership, etc., thereby creating categories that reflect their own understanding of love. For example, love is seen in the context of sexuality and erotic pleasure (eros), or it is seen as divine love of intellect (agape). Furthermore, love appears as friendship and recognition of others (philia), or it is seen as spiritual conformity (nomos).1 In spite of different descriptions of love, there appears to be a common structure to the theoretical recognition of love. Alan Soble suggests, for example, that we consider that the concept of love in the eros tradition is property-based and reason-dependent, whereas love in the agape tradition would not depend on such qualities.2 Such structural views on love help us to clarify our understanding of the subject matter, although the question still remains whether they can really explain the phenomenon of love? Robert Solomon would deny such a claim. For him, love is simply the experience of an emotion. But it is an experience that is based on choice. Our emotions are [...] intelligent constructions, structured by concepts and judgements that we learn in a particular culture, through which we give our experience some shape and meaning. [...] we do not 'fall in' love at all. Quite to the contrary, the fall is rather a creation, which we have been taught to make by a thousand movies, stories and novels; its most essential ingredient [...] is personal choice. 3 If there is validity to the assumption of personal choice, then we must also give due consideration to the social dimension of love.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Aesthetics (Journal Archive)
    Contemporary Aesthetics (Journal Archive) Volume 3 Volume 3 (2005) Article 3 2005 Recent Publications Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.risd.edu/liberalarts_contempaesthetics Part of the Aesthetics Commons Recommended Citation (2005) "Recent Publications," Contemporary Aesthetics (Journal Archive): Vol. 3 , Article 3. Available at: https://digitalcommons.risd.edu/liberalarts_contempaesthetics/vol3/iss1/3 This Recent Publications is brought to you for free and open access by the Liberal Arts Division at DigitalCommons@RISD. It has been accepted for inclusion in Contemporary Aesthetics (Journal Archive) by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@RISD. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recent Publications About CA Contemporary Aesthetics does not publish book reviews. Journal However, to inform our readers of new publications of interest, we do publish brief descriptions from information provided by Contact CA the publishers. Readers are invited to send us such information about books they think will interest other readers of CA. Links American Visual Cultures, edited by David Holloway and John Submissions Beck (New York: Continuum, 2005). Search Journal American Visual Cultures analyzes the role of painting, photography, film, television, advertising, journalism and other visual media in the historical development of the United States from the Civil War to the present day. It offers a chronology of major debates and developments in modern US history and traces the social, political and economic factors that have Editorial Board shaped the development of visual forms and practices across Permission to Reprint time. Privacy A general introduction, in which the editors discuss the theoretical and pedagogical approaches shaping the Site Map contemporary study of visual culture, with particular reference Publisher to the United States, is followed by four sections, each covering a defined chronological period: 1861-1929; 1929- Webmaster 1963; 1963-1980; 1980 to the present.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernism After Nietzsche: Art, Ethics, and the Forms of the Everyday
    Modernism after Nietzsche: Art, Ethics, and the Forms of the Everyday by Brian C. Valentyn Department of English Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Michael Moses, Supervisor ___________________________ Toril Moi ___________________________ Thomas Pfau ___________________________ Thomas Ferraro Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of English in the Graduate School of Duke University 2012 ABSTRACT Modernism after Nietzsche: Art, Ethics, and the Forms of the Everyday by Brian C. Valentyn Department of English Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Michael Moses, Supervisor ___________________________ Toril Moi ___________________________ Thomas Pfau ___________________________ Thomas Ferraro An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of English in the Graduate School of Duke University 2012 Copyright by Brian C. Valentyn 2012 Abstract This dissertation uses Nietzsche‟s writings on truth and metaphor as a lens through which to reconsider the contribution that modernist art sought to make to both the understanding and, ultimately, the reconstruction of everyday life. It begins with a consideration of the sentiment, first articulated on a wide scale by the artists and philosophers of the romantic era, that something essential to the cohesion of individual and social experience has been lost during the turbulent transition to modernity. By situating Nietzsche‟s thought vis-à-vis the decline of nineteenth-century idealism in both its Continental and Victorian forms, I demonstrate how his principal texts brought to an advanced stage of philosophical expression a set of distinctly post-romantic concerns about the role of mind and language in the construction of reality that would soon come to define the practice of modernism in philosophy and the arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Santayana's Hermeneutics of Poetry and Philosophy
    limbo Núm. 40, 2020, pp. 139-156 issn: 0210-1602 Santayana’s Hermeneutics of Poetry and Philosophy Leonarda Vaiana George Santayana, Th ree Philosophical Poets: Lucretius, Dante, and Goethe, in Th e Works of George Santayana, coedited by Kellie Dawson and David E. Spiech, with an Introduction by James Seaton, vol. viii, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England, Th e Mit Press., 2019, 239+xxxvi. George Santayana was mentioned as “a brilliant philosopher and a man of letter” by the famous novelist and literary critic T.S. Eliot, who was one of Santayana’s students at Harvard. Some years later, John Crowe Ransom summed up this assessment labelling Santayana “literary philosopher”, and not so long ago Irving Singer entitled one of his books Santayana, Literary Philosopher. Yet not only literature and philosophy are the elements of a blend giving rise to original insights within the fi eld of literary criticism, as Singer suggests [Singer (2000)]. Rather they are totally melted, in Santayana’s words, in “a personal work of art” that makes it inappropriate to distinguish between literature and philosophy. Evidence of this are the questions that Santayana introduces at the beginning of his Th ree Philosophical Poets: Lucretius, Dante, and Goethe: “Are poets, at heart, in search of a philosophy? Or is philosophy in the end, nothing but poetry?” (p. 6). Th us, James Seaton, in his stimulating introduction to the recent critical edition of this work, is right to assert the eccentricity of the close connection of philosophy and poetry, which “allowed Santayana to express the central emphasis of his own way of Notas críticas 139 140 Leonarda Vaiana thinking”, while “the most influential philosophical schools in England and the United States during Santayana’s lifetime discounted any relationship between philosophy and poetry and instead emphasized the connection between philosophy and science” (p.
    [Show full text]