DOCSLIB.ORG

Christchurch Hospital Campus Passive Fire and Seismic Compliance Works

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Christchurch Hospital Campus Passive Fire and Seismic Compliance Works CORPORATE OFFICE Level 1 32 Oxford Terrace Telephone: 0064 3 364 4160 Christchurch Central Fax: 0064 3 364 4165 CHRISTCHURCH 8011 [email protected] 19 February 2021 9(2)(a) RE Official information request CDHB 10497 I refer to your email received 1 December 2020, requesting the following information under the Official Information Act from Canterbury DHB. Specifically: any correspondence in the last six months between the executive management team and senior clinical staff/leaders about the refurbishment of Parkside hospital wards and the business case for Tower three and/or tower four Please refer to Appendix 1, which contains correspondence between executive management team members and senior clinical staff/leaders regarding the refurbishment of Parkside hospital wards and the business case for Towers 3 and 4. This correspondence is for the six months from 1 June 2020 to 1 December 2020. Please note: there are some sections of the correspondence which contain unmarked redactions due to being out of scope of the request. Additionally, one further section has been redacted due to the free and frank nature of expression, as pursuant to section 9(2)(g)(i) of the Official Information Act, i.e. “maintain the effective conduct of public affairs through – the free and frank expression of opinions…” any correspondence between Sir John Hansen and MoH staff in the last six months about the refurbishment of Parkside hospital wards and the business case for Tower three and/or tower four Please refer to Appendix 2, which contains correspondence between Sir John Hansen and Ministry of Health staff regarding the refurbishment of Parkside hospital wards and the business case for Towers 3 and 4. This correspondence is for the six months from 1 June 2020 to 1 December 2020. Please note: there are some sections of the correspondence which have been redacted, either due to the commercially sensitive nature of the information as part of ongoing negotiations, or in order to maintain legal privilege. We are therefore declining to release these pieces of information pursuant to sections 9(2)(b)(ii) and 9(2)(h) of the Official Information Act, i.e. “would be likely unreasonably to prejudice the commercial position…” and to “maintain legal professional privilege…” I trust this satisfies your interest in this matter. You may, under section 28(3) of the Official Information Act, seek a review of our decision to withhold information by the Ombudsman. Information about how to make a complaint is available at www.ombudsman.parliament.nz; or Freephone 0800 802 602. Please note that this response, or an edited version of this response, may be published on the Canterbury DHB website after your receipt of this response. Yours sincerely Ralph La Salle Acting Executive Director Planning, Funding & Decision Support Appendix 1 001 CANTERBURY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD EXCERPT FROM PUBLIC EXCLUDED SPECIAL BOARD MEETING MINUTES 01 May 2020 Item 1 Christchurch Hospital Campus Master Plan - Tower 3 and Compliance Costs Resolution (xx/20) (Moved: Sir John Hansen/Seconded: Gabrielle Huria - carried) (Jo Kane and Andrew Dickerson voted against) “That the Board: i. approves the $154m Campus Masterplan Tranche 1 Reduced Cost Tower 3 Option A (containing 5 ward floors -2 floors fitted out and 3 floors shelled) and recommend it to MOH and CIC for approval.” “The Board notes: the agreed Christchurch Hospital Campus Master Plan was developed in partnership between the Canterbury DHB and the Ministry of Health; the agreed Christchurch Hospital Campus plan Programme Detailed Business Case and First Tranche Detailed Business Case included agreed population, service demand and capacity forecasts; that the original request to the Capital Investment Committee was for $437.78m to deliver a 6- ward level Tower 3 and the design for Tower 4 and Central Podium plus enabling works and minimal refurbishment of Parkside and associated facilities. This had been agreed in partnership with the Ministry of Health, Management and Clinicians as required to meet the needs of the Canterbury community and function as a tertiary provider supporting service provision across the lower North Island and South Island; the Board, while accepting the capital constraints for the sector is disappointed that only $150m has been allocated to this project; that the Clinical Leaders Group did not support this option as they consider it does not provide the capacity required to deliver and sustain current service levels and impacts on the future configuration of the Christchurch Hospital Masterplan delivery; theRELEASED time critical nature UNDER regarding THE the commencement OFFICIAL of INFORMATION the T3 project and the criticalACT need to move forward with urgency; and that future capital investment will be required within a short period of time to ensure the agreed capacity needs are met.” 002 TO: Chair and Members, Canterbury District Health Board ACCOUNTABILITY: David Meates, Chief Executive Officer DATE: 1 May 2020 Report Status – For: Decision Noting Information 1. ORIGIN OF THE REPORT Following the presentation of the Christchurch Hospital Campus Masterplan – Tower 3 and Compliance Costs paper discussed by the Board on 16 April 2020, the Board instructed the Chief Executive to undertake a discussion with the Ministry of Health (MoH) and provide a recommendation to the Board based on those discussions. This report provides that feed-back and the consequential recommendations. 2. RECOMMENDATION That the Board: i. notes the Campus Masterplan Tranche 1 Reduced Cost Options A – E developed in conjunction with Lowest Cost Compliance Options were presented to the Board and direction was given to management to clarify the amount of available Crown capital; ii. notes that the Board, being cognisant of available Crown capital, directed management to seek guidance from the MoH in relation to either: (a) reduced Cost Option A (paired with Lowest Anticipated Compliance Cost); or (b) reduced Cost Option C, but with all six floors shelled; iii. notes the feedback from the MoH in relation to the options above; iv. approves the Campus Masterplan Tranche 1 Reduced Cost Option A Tower 3 ($154m) in conjunction with Lowest Anticipated Compliance Cost Option $80m – ( $29m funded by MoH and $51m by CDHB); and v. approves the submission of the selected Reduced Cost Option to the MoH / CIC. 3. DISCUSSION The Christchurch Hospital Campus Master Plan – Tower 3 report outlined a range of modified capital options A-E in response to advice being received from the MoH (via the Capital Investment Committee (CIC)) advising the CDHB that there is insufficient capital available nationally to support the preferred option containedRELEASED in the co -UNDERcommissioned THE Ministry OFFICIAL of Health (INFORMATIONMoH) and Canterbury DistrictACT Health Board Programme Business Case (PBC) and the Detailed Business Case (DBC) Tranche 1. The revised cost options ranged from $154m (Option A) through to the Executive recommended option $218m (Option E). The challenge that was being outlined in the report was balancing capital constraint with being able to “just” have enough capacity to sustain services. There was a critical decision articulated as to whether to progress with five floors and thus forgo permanently future capacity or progress with six floors and delay access to new capacity as the additional cost would mean that the floors would need to be shelled until more capital became available. Engineering constraints meant that the five versus six floor decision 003 had to be taken at the initiation of the project. To fit within the $150m capital envelope, the Board choices were either: • Option A (5 floors) or a revised • Option C but with all 6 floors shelled. As a result of the Board meeting on 16 April 2020, the Board requested that the Chief Executive share the recommendations from the report with the MoH (Michelle Arrowsmith) and to seek guidance / advice as to how best we arrive at a position that the MoH and DHB could support recognising that neither option was ideal but recognising the capital constraints. After discussion, a response in writing was received from the MoH on 27 April 2020 which advised that: “CDHB take to CIC as soon as possible a solution for Tower 3 as close to $150m as possible from the information you have provided to me and my team we think the option for Tower 3 at $154m fits this. The other options you have considered that only provide a solution of shelled space are in our view very unlikely to be well received by CIC.” On this basis, we are recommending that the Board progresses with Option A – five floors at a cost of $154m. In addition, the final recommendation to be presented includes a programme for achieving minimal building compliance by progressing earthquake repairs and passive fire remediation for Parkside, Clinical Services Block and remaining parts of Riverside. It should be noted that the minimum compliance cost option will see the bulk of the existing facilities in Parkside retained for the next 10 to 15 years without any upgrades. This includes a large portion of the hospital’s theatre capacity and these are generally the original theatres now more than 35 years old which have not had any significant upgrades in their life. Capital Funding The minimal compliance (fire and seismic) equates to $80m – $29m funded by MoH (of which $5m is already included in the Option A budget allocation) and $51m by CDHB. The $51m has been included in all of the capital intentions / annual plans /long term investment plans as an identified part of the earthquake Programme of Works (POW). The earthquake POW was developed in response to a level of damage (over $545m) which far exceeded the available funds including the maximised insurance settlement. Projects were prioritised to fit within a Board approvedRELEASED available UNDERfunding which THE totalled OFFICIAL $383.35m (POW) INFORMATION and consisted of $290m ACT insurance settlement (total settlement received less costs pre-settlement) and $93.35m of DHB capital which was planned to come from free cash flow generated by depreciation charges over the period of the programme.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Optimizing and Standardizing ACS Patient Pathways Canterbury and the New Zealand Healthcare System
    ACHIEVING MEASURABLY BETTER HEALTHCARE PERFORMANCE Optimizing and Standardizing ACS Patient Pathways Canterbury and the New Zealand Healthcare System Patients with chest pain (or other symptoms of a heart attack) are one of the most common patient groups presenting to the Emergency Department (ED). Traditionally, 90% of these patients would be admitted to the ED, exposing many patients to unnecessary risk through invasive testing and representing a large burden to the health system. An integrated clinical team at the Canterbury District Health Board (CDHB) recognized that the problem could be solved via use of an Accelerated Diagnostics Pathway (ADP) that enabled the safe early rule out of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI). Research partners and collaborations in accordance with the ICARE-ACS initiative led to expansive analytics and outcomes data in this area including application of evidence-based, safe, accelerated diagnostic pathways for rapid discharge of low-risk patients presenting to the ED with suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). Identification of ‘low-risk’ patients using TIMI risk profiles and cardiac biomarkers measured on admission enabled discharge protocols that maximized patient safety while admitting high-risk patients in need of further care. Iterative improvements were observed year over year following adoption of the EDACS risk score and using more sensitive cardiac biomarkers. While maximum discharge rates can be observed with ADP processes leveraging high sensitivity troponin, safe discharge is also possible using point of care. Implementation of these ADP pathways have positively impacted Key Performance Indictors (KPIs) throughout the Canterbury Health System including median length of stay, number of patients transported to central hospitals, cost of prolonged stays and cost of transports, patient satisfaction, and increased clinician confidence.
    [Show full text]
  • BMJ Open Is Committed to Open Peer Review. As Part of This Commitment We Make the Peer Review History of Every Article We Publish Publicly Available
    BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025253 on 5 May 2019. Downloaded from BMJ Open is committed to open peer review. As part of this commitment we make the peer review history of every article we publish publicly available. When an article is published we post the peer reviewers’ comments and the authors’ responses online. We also post the versions of the paper that were used during peer review. These are the versions that the peer review comments apply to. The versions of the paper that follow are the versions that were submitted during the peer review process. They are not the versions of record or the final published versions. They should not be cited or distributed as the published version of this manuscript. BMJ Open is an open access journal and the full, final, typeset and author-corrected version of record of the manuscript is available on our site with no access controls, subscription charges or pay-per-view fees (http://bmjopen.bmj.com). If you have any questions on BMJ Open’s open peer review process please email [email protected] http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ on October 2, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. BMJ Open BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025253 on 5 May 2019. Downloaded from Comparing the variants of takotsubo syndrome: an observational study of the electrocardiogram and structural changes. ForJournal: peerBMJ Open review only Manuscript ID bmjopen-2018-025253 Article Type: Research Date Submitted by the Author: 05-Jul-2018 Complete List of Authors: Watson, George; Christchurch Hospital, Cardiology Chan, Christina; Christchurch Hospital, Cardiology Belluscio, Laura; Christchurch Hospital, Biostatistics Doudney, Kit; Canterbury District Health Board, Molecular Pathology Lacey, Cameron; Christchurch Hospital, Psychological Medicine Kennedy, Martin; University of Otago, Department of Pathology Bridgman, Paul; Christchurch Hospital, Cardiology Echocardiography < CARDIOLOGY, Heart failure < CARDIOLOGY, Keywords: Cardiomyopathy < CARDIOLOGY, Takotsubo http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ on October 2, 2021 by guest.
    [Show full text]
  • Scan, Scan, Scan – Everywhere You Go
    CEO UPDATE 25 January 2021 | 25 Kohi-ta–tea 2021 Scan, scan, scan – everywhere you go When did you last go to the supermarket? What day was it? And what time did you enter and leave the store? When did you visit the playground with the kids? Can you recall whether you scanned in the last time you visited a café, the chemist or library? The announcement yesterday of a community case of COVID-19 in a returnee after they’d left managed isolation is a sobering and timely reminder that we can’t let our guard down – we need to keep up all the good habits that served us well last year. COVID-19 is an extremely tricky virus to manage, as we’ve seen overseas and here in New Zealand. Thankfully this person was diligently using the app everywhere she went. It’s so important to use the COVID Tracer app to scan QR codes and to have the Bluetooth functionality turned on. Turning on Bluetooth functionality will allow you to receive an alert if you have been near another app user who tests positive for COVID-19. If you haven’t already done so, download the COVID Tracer app today, turn on Bluetooth and scan or keep a written record of where you go and when, and who you are with. It’s also important to stay home if you are unwell, maintain stringent hygiene practices, including washing and drying your hands and cover coughs and sneezes with a tissue or use your If you’ve been travelling in Northland recently, you can check here for elbow.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Experience with Dabigatran Etexilate at Auckland City Hospital
    THE NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL Journal of the New Zealand Medical Association CONTENTS This Issue in the Journal 4 A summary of the original articles featured in this issue Editorial 7 A call for collaboration on inflammatory bowel disease in New Zealand Russell Walmsley Original Articles 11 The cost of paediatric and perianal Crohn’s disease in Canterbury, New Zealand Michaela Lion, Richard B Gearry, Andrew S Day, Tim Eglinton 21 Screening for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection among healthcare workers in New Zealand: prospective comparison between the tuberculin skin test and the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube® assay Joshua T Freeman, Roger J Marshall, Sandie Newton, Paul Austin, Susan Taylor, Tony C Chew, Siobhan Gavaghan, Sally A Roberts 30 Audit of stroke thrombolysis in Wellington, New Zealand: disparity between in-hours and out-of-hours treatment time Katie Thorne, Lai-Kin Wong, Gerard McGonigal 37 Training medical students in Pacific health through an immersion programme in New Zealand Faafetai Sopoaga, Jennie L Connor, John D Dockerty, John Adams, Lynley Anderson 46 Insomnia treatment in New Zealand Karyn M O’Keeffe, Philippa H Gander, W Guy Scott, Helen M Scott 60 Evaluation of New Zealand’s bicycle helmet law Colin F Clarke 70 Sun protection policies and practices in New Zealand primary schools Anthony I Reeder, Janet A Jopson, Andrew Gray Viewpoint 83 Should measurement of vitamin D and treatment of vitamin D insufficiency be routine in New Zealand? Mark J Bolland, Andrew Grey, James S Davidson, Tim Cundy, Ian R Reid NZMJ 10 February 2012, Vol 125 No 1349; ISSN 1175 8716 Page 1 of 126 http://journal.nzma.org.nz/journal/125-1349/5068/ ©NZMA Clinical Correspondence 92 A case of yellow fever vaccine-associated disease Heather Isenman, Andrew Burns 96 An unusual cause of carotid sinus hypersensitivity/syndrome Donny Wong, Joey Yeoh 99 Medical image.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Science
    Health Science Key facts: • Canterbury District Health Board owns and operates five major hospitals and almost 30smaller rural hospitals • Health sector contributes 8% to region’s GDP • Te Papa Hauora is a brand-new Health Precinct located next to Christchurch Hospital –attracting research talent and funding in areas like biomedical and clinical research, health science education, health innovation, and health-related information technology • Manawa co-locates health education and research activities for the Canterbury District Health Board, the University of Canterbury and the Ara Institute of Canterbury • Christchurch hospital has the busiest Emergency Department in Australasia, treating more than 83,000 patients a year • The University of Canterbury’s school of Health Sciences is rated within the top 125 in the world. With access to world-class health services and outstanding medical facilities, it’s no surprise Canterbury is home to one of the largest and most successful health science communities in New Zealand. Primarily managed by the Canterbury District Health Board (CDHB), the region owns and operates five major hospital facilities in Christchurch and Ashburton, and almost 30 smaller rural hospitals and community bases around North and South Canterbury. This community services more than 550,000 people and contributes around 8% to the region’s GDP. In recent years, Christchurch has grown to become one of the country’s leading hubs for health tech, health education, and medical research and innovation – driven largely by the brand-new Te Papa Hauora Health Precinct. Located in the heart of the city, the precinct brings together researchers, students and clinicians to encourage a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship and promote health science-related research and development.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Trauma Care for Critically Bleeding Patients: a History, Evidence Summary and Proposed Quality Improvement Approach
    Improving trauma care for critically bleeding patients: A history, evidence summary and proposed quality improvement approach September 2020 Contents List of abbreviations .............................................................................................................. 3 Background ........................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 4 The current state of critical haemorrhage in New Zealand .................................................... 6 Reducing preventable deaths................................................................................................ 7 The current response to trauma-related critical haemorrhage in New Zealand ...................... 9 A national audit of massive transfusion protocol usage by the New Zealand Blood Service 11 Coagulopathy in major trauma and its treatment ................................................................. 12 Ensuring appropriate use of tranexamic acid ...................................................................... 14 Promoting increased use of goal-directed therapy .............................................................. 15 Limiting the use of crystalloid to elevate blood pressure in trauma patients......................... 16 Why a new trauma-focused critical bleeding bundle of care for New Zealand? ................... 17 Process improvement
    [Show full text]
  • Some Personal Overviews by Hugh Jamieson Bruce White Ray Trott
    b The development of MEDICAL PHYSICS and BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING in NEW ZEALAND HOSPITALS 1945-1995 _____________ Some personal overviews by Hugh Jamieson Bruce White Ray Trott Jack Tait Gordon Monks __________ Editor H D Jamieson ___________ Second edition First published 1995 Second edition 1996 Reprinted 2006 ISBN 0-476-01437-9 ii CONTENTS Second edition Index of photographs; Staff lists .. .. .. .. iv Preface, and Preface to Second Edition .. .. .. 1 Introduction .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2 Early hospital physics in NZ: "Some memory fragments" 3 Around the centres (first appointments in the 6 centres) 7 Supervoltage radiotherapy (summary) .. .. .. 8 Nuclear medicine (summary) .. .. .. .. .. 12 Nuclear medicine imaging (summary) .. .. .. 14 Biomedical engineering (summary) .. .. .. .. 15 Computing in hospitals (summary) .. .. .. .. 18 The ongoing developments (summary); Conclusion .. 20 Photograph, 1954 inaugural NZMPA meeting, Christchurch 21 Hospital/Medical Physics in Dunedin - Hugh Jamieson 23 Wellington Hospital - Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering .. 62 Hospital Physics Beginnings at Auckland Hospital .. 68 The History of Nuclear Medicine in Auckland -Bruce White 71 Auckland Hospital...Medical Physics & Clinical Engineering - Bruce White 83 Hospital/Medical Physics at Palmerston North Hospital - Ray Trott 97 Medical Physics & Bioengineering at Christchurch Hospital - Jack Tait 108 Hospital Physics / Scientific Services at Waikato Hospital - Gordon Monks 135 Retrospect and contemplation .. .. .. .. 151 = = = = = = = = = = =
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Version Here
    © Kelvin L Lynn, Adrian L Buttimore, Peter J Hatfield, Martin R Wallace Published 2018 by Kelvin L Lynn, Adrian L Buttimore, Peter J Hatfield, Martin R Wallace National Library of New Zealand Cataloguing-Publication Data Title: The Treatment of Kidney Failure in New Zealand Authors: Kelvin L Lynn, Adrian L Buttimore, Peter J Hatfield, Martin R Wallace Publisher: Kelvin L Lynn, Adrian L Buttimore, Peter J Hatfield, Martin R Wallace Address: 1 Weston Road, Christchurch 8052, New Zealand ISBN PDF - 978-0-473-45293-3 A catalogue record for this book is available from the National Library of New Zealand Front cover design by Simon Van der Sluijs The Tom Scott cartoon on page 90 is reproduced with the kind permission of the artist and Stuff. The New Zealand Women's Weekly are thanked for permission to use the photo on page 26. All rights reserved 2 Acknowledgements The editors would like to thank Kidney Health New Zealand for hosting this publication on their website and providing support for design and editing. In the Beginning, the history of the Medical Unit at Auckland Hospital, provided valuable information about the early days of nephrology at Auckland Hospital. Ian Dittmer, Laurie Williams and Prue Fieldes provided access to archival material from the Department of Renal Medicine at Auckland Hospital. The Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry provided invaluable statistics regarding patients treated for kidney failure in New Zealand. Marg Walker of Canterbury Medical Library, University of Otago, Christchurch and Alister Argyle provided advice on online publishing. We are indebted to the following for writing chapters: Max Morris, William Wong and John Collins.
    [Show full text]
  • Rich Man, Poor Man, Environmentalist, Thief
    Rich man, poor man, environmentalist, thief Biographies of Canterbury personalities written for the Millennium and for the 150th anniversary of the Canterbury Settlement Richard L N Greenaway Cover illustration: RB Owen at front of R T Stewart’s Avon River sweeper, late 1920s. First published in 2000 by Christchurch City Libraries, PO Box 1466, Christchurch, New Zealand Website: library.christchurch.org.nz All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from Christchurch City Libraries. ISBN 0 908868 22 7 Designed by Jenny Drummond, Christchurch City Libraries Printed by The Caxton Press, Christchurch For Daisy, Jan and Richard jr Contents Maria Thomson 7 George Vennell and other Avon personalities 11 Frederick Richardson Fuller 17 James Speight 23 Augustus Florance 29 Allan Hopkins 35 Sali Mahomet 41 Richard Bedward Owen 45 Preface Unsung heroines was Canterbury Public Library’s (now Genealogical friends, Rona Hayles and Margaret Reid, found Christchurch City Libraries) contribution to Women’s overseas information at the Family History Centre of the Suffrage Year in 1994. This year, for the Millennium and 150th Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Professional anniversary of the founding of the Canterbury Settlement, researchers Valerie Marshall in Christchurch and Jane we have produced Rich man, poor man, environmentalist, thief. Smallfield in Dunedin showed themselves skilled in the use In both works I have endeavoured to highlight the lives of of the archive holdings of Land Information New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Signs of the Times
    January 2020 SIGNS OF THE TIMES Christchurch Hospital Hagley, New Zealand’s largest and newest hospital, is fitted with more than 900 photoluminescent exit signs from Ecoglo International. By contrast, PL exit signs contain no batteries, and are now widely regarded as mainstream equipment in commercial, institutional Signs of the Times and multi-level residential buildings in Europe and North America, The newly opened Acute Services Building (Christchurch Hospital with a rapidly growing popularity in Australasia. Hagley) in Christchurch, New Zealand, features world-class tech- nologies, including super-efficient photoluminescent exit signage that will save the facility more than $1 million in overall costs over There are more than 900 Ecoglo 10 years. PL signs positioned strategically When New Zealand’s newest and largest hospital – Christch- throughout Christchurch Hospital urch Hospital Hagley – welcomed its first patients in late 2019, Hagley’s corridors and rooms. the $483 million facility not only revealed a new level of superior healthcare, it also demonstrated a commitment to highly efficient building operations and management. A perfect example of the building’s cutting-edge fitments is its There are more than 900 Ecoglo PL signs positioned strategically photoluminescent (PL) ‘glow in the dark’ emergency exit signage, throughout Christchurch Hospital Hagley’s corridors and rooms. which was supplied by Australasian specialist PL company Eco- All fitted PL signs satisfy Australian and New Zealand building glo International. code requirements for exit signage. PL emergency exit signs glow in complete darkness for hours There are two main families of PL exit signs used in Christchurch using energy derived from ambient light (either daylight or artificial Hospital Hagley.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Trauma Destination Policy Lower North Island Area
    New Zealand Out-of-Hospital Major Trauma Destination Policy Lower North Island Area This document is for the use of clinical personnel when determining the destination hospital for patients with major trauma in the out-of-hospital setting in the Lower North Island Area of New Zealand. It has been developed by the Central Regional Major Trauma Network in conjunction with the National Major Trauma Clinical Network and the Ambulance Sector. Publication date February 2017 Major Trauma Destination Flowchart Lower North Island Area YES Is a life threatening problem present requiring Closest appropriate immediate medical intervention? medical facility. Activate staging if this is not a major NO trauma hospital Are any of the following present? • Intubated and ventilated for severe TBI YES • Lateralising neurological signs Wellington Regional Hospital • Clinically obvious penetrating brain injury • Complex multi-system trauma NO Are any of the following present? • Manageable airway obstruction YES Wellington Regional Hospital • Respiratory distress Palmerston North Hospital • Shock Hawkes Bay Regional Hospital • Motor score less than or equal to five Whanganui Hospital • Penetrating trauma to the neck or torso • Crush injury to the neck or torso • Flail chest • Penetrating trauma to a limb with arterial injury YES • More than one long bone fracture • Crushed, amputated, mangled or pulseless limb • Clinically obvious pelvic fracture • Burns involving the airway • Burns >20% of body surface area YES Starship Hospital (children) • Paraplegia or quadriplegia* Christchurch Hospital (adults) NO Consider: YES Wellington Regional Hospital Are additional risk factors present? Palmerston North Hospital Hawkes Bay Regional Hospital NO Whanganui Hospital Most appropriate medical facility Note: * Refer to the Spinal Cord Injury Destination Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • George Abbott Symposium 2011 Department of Paediatrics, Christchurch August 19 Th – 20Th
    George Abbott Symposium 2011 Department of Paediatrics, Christchurch August 19 th – 20th Theme: Zero to Two Invited Speakers: Professor David Isaacs The George Abbott Visiting Professor Paediatric infectious Diseases Specialist Children’s Hospital Westmead, University of Sydney Editor, Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health Dr Rick Jarman Centre for Community Child Health The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne Dr Simon Rowley Neonatal Paediatrician, Auckland City Hospital Trustee and Spokesperson, Brainwave Trust Aotearoa Local Speakers: Associate Professor Nicola Austin Chief of Child Health, CDHB Clinical Director, Neonatal Services, Christchurch Women’s Hospital Professor Spencer Beasley Paediatric Surgeon, Christchurch Hospital Professor Brian Darlow CureKids Professor of Paediatric Research University of Otago, Christchurch Dr Bronwyn Dixon Neonatal Paediatrician, Christchurch Women's Hospital Dr John Garrett Paediatrician, Christchurch Hospital Dr Maggie Meeks Neonatal Paediatrician, Christchurch Women's Hospital Clinical Education Advisor, University of Otago, Christchurch Debbie O'Donoghue Neonatal Nurse Manager, Christchurch Women's Hospital Associate Professor Philip Pattemore Respiratory Paediatrician, University of Otago Christchurch Dr Tony Walls Paediatric Infectious Diseases Specialist, University of Otago Christchurch Dr John Wright Visiting Paediatric Cardiologist, Christchurch Hospital Paediatric Cardiologist, Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland George Abbott Symposium Christchurch Hospital Oncology Centre Lecture
    [Show full text]