Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 151 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2005 No. 151 House of Representatives The House met at 10:30 a.m. and was certainly did not manipulate or mis- ligence Committee has been disputed called to order by the Speaker pro tem- represent any intelligence to Congress, by several senior intelligence officials. pore (Mr. GOHMERT). the American people or to the inter- Richard Kerr, the former acting CIA di- f national community. rector, who led an internal investiga- Mr. Speaker, this is just one more tion of the CIA’s failure to correctly DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO false claim in a history of falsehoods analyze Iraq’s weapons of mass de- TEMPORE put forward by this administration in struction capability, stated that the The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- its effort to cover up its failures in intelligence analysts were pressured fore the House the following commu- Iraq. Today’s New York Times edi- and heavily so. Senators ROCKEFELLER, nication from the Speaker: torial attempts to set the record DURBIN and LEVIN noted in their addi- tional views to the Senate Intelligence WASHINGTON, DC, straight on the Bush coverup of the November 15, 2005. truth. Committee’s report that the CIA’s I hereby appoint the Honorable LOUIE On Veterans Day, President Bush independent review found, and I quote, GOHMERT to act as Speaker pro tempore on claimed that Congress had access to significant pressure on the intelligence this day. the same intelligence as his adminis- community to find evidence that sup- J. DENNIS HASTERT, tration. This is patently false. Accord- ported a connection between Iraq and Speaker of the House of Representatives. ing to the Washington Post and The al Qaeda. f New York Times, President Bush and A second independent investigation by the CIA ombudsman found that the, MORNING HOUR DEBATES his aides had access to much more vo- luminous intelligence information quote, hammering by the Bush Admin- The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- than did lawmakers, who are dependent istration on Iraq intelligence was un- usual and that George Tenet confirmed ant to the order of the House of Janu- on his administration to provide Con- that agency officials had raised with ary 4, 2005, the Chair will now recog- gress with materials. him personally the matter of pressure nize Members from lists submitted by More recently, the President has as- on analysts. the majority and minority leaders for serted that Congress had more intel- morning hour debates. The Chair will President Bush tries to assert that ligence information than the White President Clinton believed in the same alternate recognition between the par- House. This is so patently absurd, I ties, with each party limited to not to threat. What he leaves out is that barely know how to respond. The only President Clinton has repeatedly as- exceed 30 minutes, and each Member, intelligence materials the Congress except the majority leader, the minor- serted that he believes it was a mis- has, it receives from the President and take to invade Iraq before the United ity leader, or the minority whip, lim- his administration. Nations weapons inspectors had a ited to not to exceed 5 minutes. The President has gone on to state chance to complete their investigation. The Chair recognizes the gentleman that the bipartisan investigation car- In fact, the U.N. investigation was from Massachusetts (Mr. MCGOVERN) ried out by the Senate Intelligence aborted before it even had a chance to for 5 minutes. Committee found, and I again quote, no really begin by the launch of U.S. mili- f evidence of political pressure to change tary operations. the intelligence community’s judg- Mr. Speaker, President Bush asserts PRESIDENT BUSH CAN’T REWRITE ments related to Iraq’s weapons pro- that other governments’ intelligence HISTORY grams. agencies agreed with ours. That is sim- Mr. MCGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, begin- This claim is wrong on several ply false. Many countries felt that the ning on Veterans Day, President Bush counts. First, the Senate Select Com- U.S. intelligence was faulty or over- has begun a series of attacks against mittee on Intelligence has not yet done blown and did not agree with their own his critics on the war in Iraq. He has its inquiry into whether Bush officials intelligence data, and that is why they been supported by a well-orchestrated mischaracterized or misrepresented in- opposed us in the United Nations Secu- set of groupies of conservative policy- telligence. rity Council or declined to provide makers, Members of Congress and talk- Second, the Senate Intelligence Com- troops for our invasion. Even this year ing heads all spouting the same line, mittee’s first report did find that the we have heard Vice President CHENEY that the Bush Administration was not national intelligence estimate was ma- continue to imply that Iraq was some- alone in believing that Iraq had weap- nipulated. how tied to the September 11 attacks ons of mass destruction. Everyone Finally, the overall soft approach of and was developing weapons of mass thought so. And the administration this first report by the Senate Intel- destruction. b This symbol represents the time of day during the House proceedings, e.g., b 1407 is 2:07 p.m. Matter set in this typeface indicates words inserted or appended, rather than spoken, by a Member of the House on the floor. H10163 . VerDate Aug 31 2005 03:57 Nov 16, 2005 Jkt 049060 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A15NO7.000 H15NOPT1 H10164 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE November 15, 2005 Well, let us set the record straight. Foreign intelligence services did not have but it is Mr. Bush and his team who are re- There were no weapons of mass de- full access to American intelligence. But writing history. struction, there were no ties to al some had dissenting opinions that were ig- f Qaeda, there was no imminent threat. nored or not shown to top American offi- cials. Congress had nothing close to the NEW DAY FOR HEALTH CARE The arguments in favor of war pre- President’s access to intelligence. The Na- sented to Congress and the American The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- tional Intelligence Estimate presented to ant to the order of the House of Janu- people by the President deliberately Congress a few days before the vote on war used the most inflammatory of lan- was sanitized to remove dissent and make ary 4, 2005, the gentleman from Georgia guage. conjecture seem like fact. (Mr. PRICE) is recognized during morn- Mr. Speaker, I would like to say one It’s hard to imagine what Mr. Bush means ing hour debates for 5 minutes. more word on the President’s latest se- when he says everyone reached the same Mr. PRICE of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, ries of attacks. He says that those of us conclusion. There was indeed a widespread contrary to what some of my friends on who criticize the war, who called for belief that Iraq had chemical and biological the other side of the aisle do, I like to weapons. But Mr. Clinton looked at the data withdrawal, or who focused on how the take this time, morning hour, and and concluded that inspections and pressure share a little good news with the Amer- American people were deliberately mis- were working—a view we now know was ac- led into supporting the invasion on curate. France, Russia and Germany said ican people, because this is an exciting Iraq, that somehow we are betraying war was not justified. Even Britain admitted day. It is a new day for health care in our troops and advocating a cut-and- later that there had been no new evidence our Nation. It is a day of great oppor- run strategy. about Iraq, just new politics. tunity for seniors all across our Na- Mr. Speaker, our troops, who have The administration had little company in tion. Today is the first day that seniors carried out this mission with courage, saying that Iraq was actively trying to build all across America are able to sign up dignity and sacrifice, represent our Na- a nuclear weapon. The evidence for this voluntarily and participate in the new claim was a dubious report about an attempt tion with honor, but they have been be- in 1999 to buy uranium from Niger, later Medicare part D prescription drug pro- trayed. They have been betrayed by shown to be false, and the infamous alu- gram. policymakers who rushed into a war on minum tubes story. That was dismissed at As many members of Congress know, false pretenses, they were betrayed by the time by analysts with real expertise. I am a third-generation physician, and policymakers who sent them into The Bush administration was also alone in the things that were available to treat harm’s way and overruled the good ad- making the absurd claim that Iraq was in patients by my father and my grand- vice of our top military leaders as to league with Al Qaeda and somehow con- father have changed so significantly. troop strength and post-invasion plan- nected to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. That was based on two false tales. One was the sup- The kinds of things that I was able to ning, and they have been betrayed by posed trip to Prague by Mohamed Atta, a re- use to take care of patients were re- policymakers who will not admit that port that was disputed before the war and markably different than those that my mistakes were made and significant came from an unreliable drunk.
Recommended publications
  • BATTLEFIELD UPDATE Newsletter of the AMERICAN BATTLEFIELD PROTECTION PROGRAM U.S
    JSpring1998 Issue No. 69 BATTLEFIELD UPDATE newsletter of the AMERICAN BATTLEFIELD PROTECTION PROGRAM U.S. Department of the Interior • National Park Service • Heritage Preservation Services 1998 BATTLEFIELD PRESERVATION PROJECTS SELECTED COIN FUNDS SUPPORT BRANDY STATION PURCHASE The American Battlefield Protection Program thanks everyone who applied for 1998 project funding. This year's competition was open to projects at battlefields On February 19, 1998, the Secretary of the associated with all wars and battles fought on American soil. As in the past, Interior approved The Civil War Trust's however, projects addressing sites listed on the Civil War Sites Advisory proposal to award $500,000 in Civil War Commission's Priority I and II lists took precedence. commemorative coin revenues to the Association for the Preservation of Civil The ABPP received 63 applications for eligible projects. The review panel of War Sites (APCWS). APCWS will use the ten historians and preservation planners recommended funding 20 projects that funds to assist in the purchase of battlefield exemplify strong battlefield land preservation strategies. Reviewers based their land at Brandy Station, in Culpeper County, ^selections on seven criteria: 1) significance of the site; 2) level of threat to the Virginia. After almost ten years of bitter battlefield; 3) battlefield land preservation opportunity; 4) clear project objec­ disputes between preservationists and tives, tasks, and schedule; 5) community support and participation in the project; developers, APCWS has successfully i6) qualifications of the applicant; and 7) clear and justified project budget. financed the acquisition of 571 acres of core battlefield land at Brandy Station. National Park Service Director Robert Stanton approved the list of projects on APCWS plans to place the entire acquisi­ March 2, 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • The Other Side of the Monument: Memory, Preservation, and the Battles of Franklin and Nashville
    THE OTHER SIDE OF THE MONUMENT: MEMORY, PRESERVATION, AND THE BATTLES OF FRANKLIN AND NASHVILLE by JOE R. BAILEY B.S., Austin Peay State University, 2006 M.A., Austin Peay State University, 2008 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2015 Abstract The thriving areas of development around the cities of Franklin and Nashville in Tennessee bear little evidence of the large battles that took place there during November and December, 1864. Pointing to modern development to explain the failed preservation of those battlefields, however, radically oversimplifies how those battlefields became relatively obscure. Instead, the major factor contributing to the lack of preservation of the Franklin and Nashville battlefields was a fractured collective memory of the two events; there was no unified narrative of the battles. For an extended period after the war, there was little effort to remember the Tennessee Campaign. Local citizens and veterans of the battles simply wanted to forget the horrific battles that haunted their memories. Furthermore, the United States government was not interested in saving the battlefields at Franklin and Nashville. Federal authorities, including the War Department and Congress, had grown tired of funding battlefields as national parks and could not be convinced that the two battlefields were worthy of preservation. Moreover, Southerners and Northerners remembered Franklin and Nashville in different ways, and historians mainly stressed Eastern Theater battles, failing to assign much significance to Franklin and Nashville. Throughout the 20th century, infrastructure development encroached on the battlefields and they continued to fade from public memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Number 30 1999
    S02V Number 30 1999 /■ ' i ' '; ■ Williamson County Historical Society Number 30 1999 Williamson County Historical Society Executive Committee President Andrew B. Miller Vice President Bob Canaday Secretary Marjorie Hales Treasurer Jane Trabue County Historian la McDaniel Bowman Historical Markers Chairman Ridley Wills II Publications Chairman Richard Warwick The Williamson County Historical Society Journal is published annually by the Williamson County Historical Society, P.O. Box 71, Franklin, TN 37065. Copyright ©1999 by WilUamson County Historical Society. Permission to reproduce portions of this publication is granted providek attribution is given. Annual membership in the Williamson County Historical Society is $12.00 for indivi'duals; $15.00 for families. From the President V Editor's Note vu John B. McEwen j by Lula Fain Moran Major| Williamson Coimty Honor|RoU Series The Review Appeal, March 15,1998 | Virginia Carson Jefferson (1894-1993) i Virginia Carson, by Horace German; | 15 The Night Watch; The Review Appeal, September 27,1934 The Confederate Monument I 20 The Williamson County News, 1899 Two Centuries at Meeting of the Waters 28 by Ridley WiUs 11 The Capture of Aaron Burr by Nicholas Perkins 38 by Hugh Walker I The Nashville Tennessean Magazine, November 10,1963 Abram Maury, The Founder of Franklin 44 by Louise Davis i The Nashville Tennessean Magazine, October 3,1948 The Carl Family of Williamson Coimty, Termessee 48 by A1 Mayfield | 111 iv Williamson County Historical Society Journal The Carothers Family 55 by Davis Carothers Hill A Large and Respectable Family: William Thomas and His Kin 72 by Philip jFarrington Thomas Williamson Courity Fairs 81 by Rick Warwick Williamson Courity during the Civil War 91 by Rick Warwick Second Hour of Glory 95 compiled!by Marshall Morgan Index All to often our "fast food" culturei under centurions foij historical preservation.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register Off Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form 1
    NFS Form 10-900 (342) OHB No. 1024-0018 Expires 10-31-87 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NPS UM only National Register off Historic Places received MAR 3 (988 Inventory Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections 1. Name historic Historic Resources of Wllllamson County (Partial Inventory of Historic and Architectural i-roperties) and or common N/A 2. Location street & number See continuation sheets N/A not for publication city, town N/A vicinity of state Tennessee code DA 7 county Williamson code 187 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public X occupied agriculture museum building(s) private X unoccupied X commercial nark structure * both X work in progress educational X private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment x religious __. object N/A in process X yes: restricted __ government __ scientific MRA N/A being considered X_ yes: unrestricted industrial transportation X "no military X other: Vacant 4. Owner of Property name Multiple Ownership - See individual forms street & number N/A city, town N/A vicinity of state N/A courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Williamson County Courthouse street & number Public Square city, town Franklin state TN 37064 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title Williamson County Survey has this property been determined eligible? yes _X.no date 1973 - 1986 federal X state county local Tennessee Historical Commission depository for survey records city,town 701 Broadway, Nashville state TN 37203 Condition Check one Check one *_ excellent X deteriorated unaltered original siite" -4- good __X_ ruins X altered moved date A fair unexposed Describe the present and original (iff known) physical appearance Williainson County is located in the central section of Middle Tennessee.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference # Resource Name Address County City Listed Date Multiple
    Reference # Resource Name Address County City Listed Date Multiple Name 76001760 Arnwine Cabin TN 61 Anderson Norris 19760316 92000411 Bear Creek Road Checking Station Jct. of S. Illinois Ave. and Bear Creek Rd. Anderson Oak Ridge 19920506 Oak Ridge MPS 92000410 Bethel Valley Road Checking Station Jct. of Bethel Valley and Scarboro Rds. Anderson Oak Ridge 19920506 Oak Ridge MPS 91001108 Brannon, Luther, House 151 Oak Ridge Tpk. Anderson Oak Ridge 19910905 Oak Ridge MPS 03000697 Briceville Community Church and Cemetery TN 116 Anderson Briceville 20030724 06000134 Cross Mountain Miners' Circle Circle Cemetery Ln. Anderson Briceville 20060315 10000936 Daugherty Furniture Building 307 N Main St Anderson Clinton 20101129 Rocky Top (formerly Lake 75001726 Edwards‐‐Fowler House 3.5 mi. S of Lake City on Dutch Valley Rd. Anderson 19750529 City) Rocky Top (formerly Lake 11000830 Fort Anderson on Militia Hill Vowell Mountain Rd. Anderson 20111121 City) Rocky Top (formerly Lake 04001459 Fraterville Miners' Circle Cemetery Leach Cemetery Ln. Anderson 20050105 City) 92000407 Freels Cabin Freels Bend Rd. Anderson Oak Ridge 19920506 Oak Ridge MPS Old Edgemoor Rd. between Bethel Valley Rd. and Melton Hill 91001107 Jones, J. B., House Anderson Oak Ridge 19910905 Oak Ridge MPS Lake 05001218 McAdoo, Green, School 101 School St. Anderson Clinton 20051108 Rocky Top (formerly Lake 14000446 Norris Dam State Park Rustic Cabins Historic District 125 Village Green Cir. Anderson 20140725 City) 75001727 Norris District Town of Norris on U.S. 441 Anderson Norris 19750710 Tennessee Valley Authority Hydroelectric 16000165 Norris Hydrolectric Project 300 Powerhouse Way Anderson Norris 20160412 System, 1933‐1979 MPS Roughly bounded by East Dr., W.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN Franklin, Tennessee
    HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN Franklin, Tennessee Prepared For The City of Franklin Prepared By Mary Means & Associates, Inc. November 2001 Table of Contents Introduction..........................................................1 City of Franklin: A Rich and Deep History.............3 Franklin’s Historic Preservation Context..............7 Issues Affecting Historic Preservation...............17 Historic Preservation Goals...............................23 Strategies for Historic Preservation..................25 Action Agenda....................................................42 Conclusion..........................................................44 Acknowledgments..............................................45 Introduction Franklin’s history and historic resources are fundamental components of the community’s character. Historic resources, including historic buildings, archaeological sites, and historic landscapes, give a community a sense of identity, stability and orientation. Franklin’s reputation as a small town of great charm and character is founded on its physical setting. People choose to live here because of it. As the area grows and new development takes place, Franklin’s popularity is accompanied by a rising concern among residents that important aspects of community character may be at risk. Historic Preservation Plan 1 Balancing Preservation and Development coordinated fashion. Having a cogent preservation policy and plan will help the City balance decisions to accommodate both Savvy communities have realized that the question
    [Show full text]
  • “Gettysburg of the West” Texans and the Battle of Franklin Hood’S Texas Brigade Association Battlefield Tour • 2017 $595: Airfare & Hotel NOT Included
    Come Ride with Us to the . “Gettysburg of the West” Texans and the Battle of Franklin Hood’s Texas Brigade Association Battlefield Tour • 2017 $595: Airfare & Hotel NOT included Tour Leaders/Speakers: June 6-9, Sam Hood, Principal Organizer 2017 Eric Jacobson, CEO, Battle of Franklin Trust Thomas Y. Cartwright, leading authority on Battle of Franklin Robert Hicks, author of “The Widow of the South” FEATURING Columbia, TN, Hood’s HQ • Elm Springs, SCV National HQ • Spring Hill Battlefield Rippavilla Plantation • Harrison House Site • Winstead Hill • Carter House & Lotz House Fort Granger • Carnton Plantation Fort Negley • Overton Hill & Redoubt #5 The Battle of Franklin has been called “crucial to an understanding of the Western Theater of the American Civil War and, ulti- mately, the outcome of the war” (The Battle of Franklin Trust). ¶ We will visit Spring Hill and Franklin in the care and guidance of Sam Hood who has intimate knowledge of the story that is told at these sites. ¶ We will be joined by Eric Jacobson, CEO of the Battle of Franklin Trust, who oversees operations of The Carter House and Carnton Plantation. J.T. Thompson, director of the Lotz House will welcome us. ¶ We will travel by coach. Lunches will be “on the road.” ¶ Dinners Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday nights will be special with evening speakers, including Eric Jacobson and Robert Hicks, author of “The Widow of the South.” Lunches & Dinners are included in price. (A more detailed description is available.) For more information contact Martha Hartzog at 512/431-2682 or [email protected] SUMMARY ITINERARY June 8: All day Thursday June 6: Tuesday • Follow the Federal route of the retreat from Spring Hill, Afternoon arrival with a Welcome Dinner, and Overview pursued by Hood.
    [Show full text]
  • Franklin Battlefield Was Listed and Politically Realistic
    ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Plan Purpose & Goals PLAN GOALS The following general goals will be followed PLAN PURPOSE by this plan: The Battle of Franklin occurred on November 30, 1864, and it was significant in two key re- To prepare a plan based upon accurate gards. First, the level of carnage was consid- historical research. erable based upon the numerous fruitless charges made by the Confederate Army of To prepare a plan that reflects public input and a community consensus. New commercial development continues to steadily Tennessee, the effectiveness of the Union march forward on Franklin’s most hallowed ground. forces, and the resulting casualties. Secondly, To prepare a plan that identifies and pri- the battle marked the beginning of the end for oritizes the most significant properties the Western Theater of the Civil War, as and resources associated with the Hood’s Army of Tennessee was crippled to an battle. extent that it would never recover to perform as an effective fighting force. To prepare a plan that is economically The Franklin Battlefield was listed and politically realistic. among the country’s Top Ten Most Despite the importance of this sacred land, it Endangered Civil War Battlefields has been carved away by development over To prepare a plan that furthers both in 2004 by the Civil War Preserva- the past century, and now only random rem- preservation and heritage tourism nants survive. It is the purpose of this plan to objectives. tion Trust. summarize the historic significance and key themes of the battle, delineate the battlefield area, and lay out a strategy to preserve and enhance those portions of the battlefield that can still be salvaged or reclaimed.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Spreadsheet INTERNAL in PROGRESS.Xlsx
    AB C DE F GHI 1 Ref# Historic Name Other Name(s) County City Address Address Restricted Multiple Name Listing Date 2 76001760 Arnwine Cabin Anderson Norris TN 61 3/16/1976 3 92000411 Bear Creek Road Checking Station Anderson Oak Ridge Jct. of S. Illinois Ave. and Bear Creek Rd. Oak Ridge MPS 5/6/1992 4 92000410 Bethel Valley Road Checking Station Anderson Oak Ridge Jct. of Bethel Valley and Scarboro Rds. Oak Ridge MPS 5/6/1992 5 91001108 Brannon, Luther, House Hackworth,Owen,House Anderson Oak Ridge 151 Oak Ridge Tpk. Oak Ridge MPS 9/5/1991 6 03000697 Briceville Community Church and Cemetery Briceville Methodist Church Anderson Briceville TN 116 7/24/2003 7 06000134 Cross Mountain Miners' Circle Circle Cemetery; Laurel Branch Cemetery Anderson Briceville Circle Cemetery Ln. 3/15/2006 8 10000936 Daugherty Furniture Building Daugherty, J.R., Company Anderson Clinton 307 N Main St 11/29/2010 9 75001726 Edwards‐‐Fowler House Anderson Rocky Top (formerly Lake City) 3.5 mi. S of Lake City on Dutch Valley Rd. 5/29/1975 10 11000830 Fort Anderson on Militia Hill Anderson Rocky Top (formerly Lake City) Vowell Mountain Rd. 11/21/2011 11 04001459 Fraterville Miners' Circle Cemetery Leach Cemetery Anderson Rocky Top (formerly Lake City) Leach Cemetery Ln. 1/5/2005 12 92000407 Freels Cabin 40AN28 Anderson Oak Ridge Freels Bend Rd. Oak Ridge MPS 5/6/1992 13 91001107 Jones, J. B., House Daniel Arthur Rehabilitation Center (DARC) Farm #2 Anderson Oak Ridge Old Edgemoor Rd. between Bethel Valley Rd. and Melton Hill Lake Oak Ridge MPS 9/5/1991 14 05001218 McAdoo, Green, School Clinton Colored School; McAdoo, Green, Grammar School Anderson Clinton 101 School St.
    [Show full text]
  • A Master Plan for the Tennessee Civil War National Heritage Area
    A Master Plan for the Tennessee Civil War National Heritage Area Prepared by the Center for Historic Preservation, Middle Tennessee State University October 2001 2 Table of Contents 1. Project Background 2. Public Participation 3. Partnerships within the Master Planning Process and with the Management Entity 4. Master Plan: Themes and Initial Projects 5. Appendices I. Compact for the Tennessee Civil War Heritage Area II. Copies of Returned Survey Forms from Public Meeting Participants III. Copies of Website Comments and Suggestions IV. Selected News and Feature Stories 3 I. Project Background and History In 1995 Congress invited proposals from across the United States for the National Heritage Areas program of the National Park Service. A total of forty-one states submitted proposals and eight were ultimately selected, including Tennessee’s application for a statewide Civil War Heritage Area prepared by the Middle Tennessee State University’s Center for Historic Preservation (CHP) with the assistance of Congressman Bart Gordon. On November 12, 1996, Congress passed Public Law 104-333, which authorized the creation of the Tennessee Civil War Heritage Area. Tennessee, thus, became part of a select group of regions across the country where a federal, state, local, and private partnership coordinate ways to preserve, interpret, and enhance valuable historical and cultural resources. The Tennessee Civil War Heritage Area is one of eighteen congressionally designated heritage areas across the country that represent stories, people, and places of national significance. The National Heritage Areas are: 1. Augusta Canal (Georgia) 2. Automobile Heritage (Michigan) 3. Blackstone River Valley Corridor (Massachusetts and Rhode Island) 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of State History in Tennessee in 2004 the State of State
    TheThe StateState ofof StateState HistoryHistory inin TennesseeTennessee inin 20042004 AA ReportReport byby StateState HistorianHistorian WalterWalter T.T. DurhamDurham The State of State History in Tennessee in 2004 A Report by State Historian Walter T. Durham Tennessee State Library and Archives Department of State Nashville, Tennessee 37243 2004 The Honorable Riley C. Darnell Secretary of State Dr. Edwin Gleaves State Librarian and Archivist Department of State, Authorization No. 305294, 2,000 cop- ies, September 2004. This public document was promul- gated at a cost of $1.05 per copy. Contents Introduction ...................................................................................3 I. Public Response ....................................................................7 II. Working in Tennessee History..........................................31 III. Preserving Tennessee History...........................................43 IV. Conclusion and Recommendations .................................55 1 2 The State of State History in Tennessee in 2004 Introduction The purpose of this report, The State of State History in Tennessee in 2004, is to determine where we are in preserving and delivering Tennessee history to the people of this state and to those beyond our borders. We can agree that our history deserves attention and dissemination. But how is the delivery being made? Who are the persons, institutions, and agencies making delivery? Are their methods effective? Does the interpretation receive the fairest, most objective study?
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form 1. Name
    0MB HO. 1024-0018 NFS Form 10-900 (7-81) EXP. l./3i United States Department off the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections _______________ 1. Name_________________ historic Franklin Battlefield___________________ and/or common ____________________________________ 2. Location street & number not for publication city, town Franklin vicinity of state Tennessee code 47 county Williamson code 187 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public __ occupied agriculture museum X bullding(s) private X unoccupied commercial park structure X both X work in progress educational private residence _X_ site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process X yes: restricted government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military other: 4. Owner of Property name See Continuation Sheet street & number city, town vicinity of state 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Wllllamson County Registrar street & number Williamson County Courthouse city, town Franklin state Tennessee 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title has this property been determined eligible? yes no date federal state county local depository for survey records city, town state 7. Descriptions Condition Check one Check one excellent deteriorated _^ unaltered ^ original site X good ruins A altered moved date fair unexposed Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance This National Historic Landmark includes four non-contiguous properties associated with various aspects of the conduct of the Battle of Franklin: Fort Granger, Winsted Hill, the Carter House, and Carnton and the Confederate Cemetery. Each of these properties will be described below.
    [Show full text]