~Upreme <!L:Ourt

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

~Upreme <!L:Ourt l\epublic of tbe tlbilippines ~upreme <!l:ourt ;fflanila EN BANC REPUBLIC of the PHILIPPINES, G.R. No. 237428 represented by SOLICITOR GENERAL JOSE C. CALIDA, Petitioner, Present: SERENO, C.J.,* CARPIO, VELASCO, JR., LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, PERALTA, BERSAMIN, DEL CASTILLO, PERLAS-BERNABE, - versus - LEONEN, JARDELEZA, CAGUIOA, MARTIRES, TIJAM, REYES, JR., and GESMUNDO, JJ. Promulgated: MARIA LOURDES P.A. SERENO Respondent. May 11, 20~ x---------------------------------------------------------~--------------------x DECISION TIJAM, J.: Whoever walks in integrity and with moral character walks securely, but he who takes a crooked way will be discovered and punished. -The Holy Bible, Proverbs 10:9 (AMP) 'No Part. Decision 2 G.R. No. 237428 Integrity has, at all times, been stressed to be one of the required qualifications of a judge. It is not a new concept in the vocation of administering and dispensing justice. In the early l 600's, Francis Bacon, a philosopher, statesman, and jurist, in his "Essay L VI: Of Judicature" said - "'[a]bove all things, integrity is the Judge's portion and proper virtue." Neither is integrity a complex concept necessitating esoteric philosophical disquisitions to be understood. Simply, it is a qualification of being honest, truthful, and having steadfast adherence to moral and ethical principles. 1 Integrity connotes being consistent - doing the right thing in accordance with the law and ethical standards everytime. Hence, every judicial officer in any society is required to comply, not only with the laws and legislations, but with codes and canons of conduct and ethical standards as well, without derogation. As Thomas Jefferson remarked, "it is of great importance to set a resolution, never not to be shaken, never to tell an untruth. There is no vice so mean, so pitiful, so contemptible and he who permits himself to tell a lie once, finds it much easier to do it a second and third time, till at length it becomes habitual, he tells lies without attending to it, and truths without the world's believing him. This falsehood of the tongue leads to that of the heart and in time depraves all its good dispositions." Mental dishonesty and moral mischief breed all that integrity is not. In our jurisdiction, one cannot be qualified to be a member of the Judiciary, lacking such mandatory requirement of "proven integrity". Inevitably, an appointee to the position of Chief Justice of the Supreme Court must be the exemplar of honesty, probity and integrity. The purpose of this requirement is self-evident as the Chief Justice heads the Judiciary and adjudicates cases as a member of the Court that "has the last word on what the law is."2 Together with other Justices, the Chief Justice also disciplines members of the Bar for misconduct. The significance of probity and integrity as a requirement for appointment to the Judiciary is underscored by the fact that such qualifications are not explicitly required of the President, the Vice-President or the Members of Congress under the Constitution. The Constitution, thus, demands in no uncertain terms that the Chief Justice be the embodiment of moral and ethical principles. He or she must be of unquestionable character, possessed of moral authority to demand obedience to the law and to impose a rule of conduct. Indeed, one who exacts compliance with the law and ethical standards should be their foremost adherent. No one is above the law and the Constitution, not even a Chief Justice who took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution and obey the laws of the land. The Court in Francisco, Jr. v. The House of Representatives,3 says <http://www.dictionary.com/browse/integrity> (visited on March 19, 2018); <https://www.thefreedictionary.com/integrity> (visited on March 19, 2018). 2 Conde v. Intermediate Appellate Court, 228 Phil. 145, 151 ( 1986). 3 460 Phil. 830 (2003). Decision 3 G.R. No. 237428 it tritely - "the Chief Justice is not above the law and neither is any other member of this Court."4 All public officers whether in the Executive, Legislative or Judicial departments are bound to follow the law. If a public officer violates the law, he or she shall suffer punishment, sanctions and adverse consequences. The obligatory force of the law is necessary because once we allow exceptions, concessions, waiver, suspension or non­ application to those who do not want to follow the law, nobody else will obey the law. In this unprecedented case for quo warranto against the incumbent Chief Justice, the Republic entreats this Court to declare Maria Lourdes P.A. Sereno (respondent) ineligible to hold the highest post in the Judiciary for failing to. regularly disclose her assets, liabilities and net worth as a member of the career service prior to her appointment as an Associate Justice, and later as Chief Justice, of the Supreme Court, in violation of the Constitution, the Anti-Graft Law, and the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees. The Republic accordingly seeks the nullification of respondent's appointment, asserting that her failure to file the required disclosures and her failure to submit the same to the Judicial and Bar Council show that she is not possessed of "proven integrity" demanded of every aspirant to the Judiciary. The Case Invoking the Court's original jurisdiction under Section 5(1 ), Article VIII of the Constitution in relation to the special civil action under Rule 66 of the Rules of Court, the Republic of the Philippines (Republic), through the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) filed the present Petition5 for the issuance of the extraordinary writ of quo warranto to declare as void respondent's appointment as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and to oust and altogether exclude respondent therefrom. The Antecedents From November 1986 to June 1, 2006, or spanning a period of 20 years, respondent served as a member of the faculty of the University of the Philippines-College of Law (U.P. or U.P. College of Law), initially as a temporary faculty member (from November 1986 to December 31, 1991) and thereafter, as a permanent faculty member until her resignation therefrom on June 1, 2006.6 As a regular faculty member, respondent was paid by the month by U.P. 7 4 Id. at 943. 5 Rollo, pp. 3-44. 6 Id. at 172. 7 TSN, Oral Arguments on April 10, 2018. Decision 4 G.R. No. 237428 Based on the records of the U.P. Human Resources Development Office (U.P. HRD0),8 respondent was on official leave from the U.P. College of Law for the following periods: -- -- -- - ' - June 1, 2000 - May 31, 2001 June 1, 2001 - May 31, 2002 November 1, 2003 - May 31, 2004 June 1, 2004 - October 31, 2004 +----- November 1, 2004 - February 10, 2005 February 11, 2005 - October 31, 2005 November 15, 2005 - May 31, 2006 ---- While being employed at the U.P. College of Law, or from October 2003 to 2006, respondent was concurrently employed as legal counsel of the Republic in two international arbitrations: (a) PIATCO v. Republic of the Philippines and MIAA; and (b) Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. Republic of the Philippines (PIATCO cases).9 The Personal Data Sheet (PDS) accomplished under oath by respondent further details, among others, the following engagements/services rendered by her for various government agencies: 10 Position From To No. of Department/ Nature of work Supervisor Years Agency Legal Counsel 1994 2008 14 yrs. Various agencies of Legal --- various Executive government --- Office international trade Secretaries of the President, and investment Alberto Office of the Solicitor law in WTO Romulo, General, Manila (Geneva), ICSID Eduardo Ermita International Airport (Washington, and Leandro Authority, Department DC). ICC-ICA Mendoza, Chief of Agriculture, (Singapore, Paris) Presidential Department of Trade and in bilateral Legal Counsel and Industry, WTO- dispute resolution Avelino Cruz AFTA Commission, mechanisms and Merceditas Philippine Coconut Gutierrez; Authority · Solicitor Generals Alfredo Benipayo, Antonio Nachura and Agnes Devanadera, MIAA General Manager Alfonso Cusi, L Sen. Edgardo ,_____ _,___ _ _j_____l_____ --- --------------------~--------- -----~------ 8 Annex "D" of the Petition. 9 Id. at 173. 10 Id. at 850-851. Decision 5 G.R. No. 237428 - --------------- - - ---····------------- ---- ---· ---- --- --------- - --~ --- ----···-- --------- . - - ------··--·--------- ----- Angara, Sec. Salvador Escudero, Undersecretary Thomas Aquino, Amb. Lilia Bautista Deputy Commission on Legal and Acting Commissioner Human Rights (UP Administrative Chairman& Diliman, Comm. Commonwealth Ave., Abelardo QC, TEL:928-7098) Aportadera (TEL: 687- 7571) Incidentally, the U.P. HRDO certified that there was no record on respondent's 201 file of any permission to engage in limited practice of profession. 11 Her engagement as legal counsel for the Republic continued until 2009. 12 Despite having been employed at the U.P. College of Law from November 1986 to June 1, 2006, the record of the U.P. HRDO only contains the Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth (SALN) for 1985, 13 1990, 14 1991, 15 1993, 16 1994,17 1995,18 1996, 19 1997,20 and 2002,21 filed by respondent. On the other hand, the records of the Central Records Division of the Office of the Ombudsman yields that there is no SALN filed by respondent for calendar years 1999 to 2009 except for the SALN ending December 1998 which was subscribed only in August 2003 and transmitted by the U.P. HRDO to the Ombudsman only on December 16, 2003.22 Belatedly, in respondent's Ad Cautelam Manifestation/Submission, she attached a copy of her SALN for 198923 which she supposedly sourced from the "filing cabinets"24 or "drawers of U.P."25 Similarly, despite having been employed as legal counsel of various government agencies from 2003 to 2009, there is likewise no showing that she filed her SALNs for these years, except for the SALN ending December 31, 2009 which was unsubscribed and filed before the Office of the Clerk of Court only on June 22, 2012.
Recommended publications
  • Judicial Tenure and the Politics of Impeachment
    C International Journal for Court Administration International Association For copywriteart.pdf 1 12/20/17 8:30 AM Vol.CourtM Administration 9 No. 2, July 2018 ISSNY 2156-7964 URL: http://www.iacajournal.org CiteCM this as: DOI 10.18352/ijca.260 Copyright: MY CY JudicialCMY Tenure and the Politics of Impeachment - 1 ComparingK the United States and the Philippines David C. Steelman2 Abstract: On May 11, 2018, Maria Lourdes Sereno was removed from office as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines. She had been a vocal critic of controversial President Rodrigo Duterte, and he had labeled her as an “enemy.” While she was under legislative impeachment investigation, Duterte’s solicitor general filed aquo warranto petition in the Supreme Court to challenge her right to hold office. The Supreme Court responded to that petition by ordering her removal, which her supporters claimed was politically-motivated and possibly unconstitutional. The story of Chief Justice Sereno should give urgency to the need for us to consider the proposition that maintaining the rule of law can be difficult, and that attacks on judicial independence can pose a grave threat to democracy. The article presented here considers the impeachment of Chief Justice David Brock in the American state of New Hampshire in 2000, identifying the most significant institutional causes and consequences of an event that presented a crisis for the judiciary and the state. It offers a case study for the readers of this journal to reflect not only on the removal of Chief Justice Sereno, but also on the kinds of constitutional issues, such as judicial independence, judicial accountability, and separation of powers in any democracy, as arising from in conflicts between the judiciary and another branch of government.
    [Show full text]
  • Former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo Acquitted of Plunder: a Case of Justice Catering to Political Power in the Philippines?
    Former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo Acquitted of Plunder: A Case of Justice Catering to Political Power in the Philippines? By Rappler Region: South-East Asia Asia-Pacific Research, July 20, 2016 Theme: Justice, Society Rappler 19 June 2016 The presidential administration of former Philippine president Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo was marked by corruption, fraud, misuse of public funds, and utter disregard for constitutionalism and the rule of law. She has been widely accused of murder, kidnapping, plundering, and cheating. The US Embassy in Manila was even informed in 2005 by corporate accounting firm SGV founder Washington Sycip that her husband, José Miguel Arroyo, was one of the most corrupt figures in the Philippines, according to US diplomat cables that were leaked in 2011. The Arroyo Administration also arbitrarily and unlawfully arrested her political opponents while it used national security measures and the language of law and order as pretexts to suppress her opponents and Filipinos and Filipinas seeking justice. The Hello Garci scandal that emerged in 2005 merely served to prove that the 2004 Philippine general-election’s were rigged by Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and her political associates. After the scandal, Arroyo would admit that the audio evidence produced about her election rigging was authentic, but nothing happened to her. Her government argued on the basis of procedural law that since the key evidence against Arroyo was a phone conversation that was recorded without her consent that it could not be used while her political party and coalition prevented her impeachment and justice from ever taking place through legislative means by blocking any action against her by using their majority vote in the Congress of the Philippines.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion for Reconsideration
    REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES SUPREME COURT MANILA EN BANC REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY SOLICITOR GENERAL JOSE C. CALIDA, Petitioner, – versus – CHIEF JUSTICE MARIA LOURDES P.A. G.R. No. SERENO, 237428 For: Quo Warranto Respondent. Senators LEILA M. DE LIMA and ANTONIO “SONNY” F. TRILLANES IV, Movant-Intervenors. x-------------------------------------------------------------------x MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Movant-intervenors, Senators LEILA M. DE LIMA and ANTONIO “SONNY” F. TRILLANES IV, through undersigned counsel, respectfully state that: 1. On 29 May 2018, Movant-intervenors, in such capacity, requested and obtained a copy of the Decision of the Supreme Court dated 11 May 2018, by which eight members of the Court voted to grant the Petition for Quo Warranto, resulting in the ouster of Chief Justice Maria Lourdes P.A. Sereno. 2. The Supreme Court’s majority decision, penned by Justice Tijam, ruled that: 2.1. There are no grounds to grant the motion for inhibition filed by respondent Chief Justice Sereno; 2.2. Impeachment is not an exclusive means for the removal of an impeachable public official; MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Republic of the Philippines v. Sereno G.R. No. 237428 Page 2 of 25 2.3. The instant Petition for Quo Warranto could proceed independently and simultaneously with an impeachment; 2.4. The Supreme Court’s taking cognizance of the Petition for Quo Warranto is not violative of the doctrine of separation of powers; 2.5. The Petition is not dismissable on the Ground of Prescription, as “[p]rescription does not lie against the State”; and 2.6. The Petitioner sufficiently proved that Respondent violated the SALN Law, and such failure amounts to proof of lack of integrity of the Respondent to be considered, much less nominated appointed, as Chief Justice by the Judicial and Bar Council and the President of Republic, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Power of Partnership: 50+ Years of USAID in the Philippines
    POWER OF PARTNERSHIP 50+ YEARS OF USAID IN THE PHILIPPINES POWER OF PARTNERSHIP 50+ YEARS OF USAID IN THE PHILIPPINES Copyright 2017 by United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Philippines. U.S. Embassy, 1201 Roxas Boulevard Ermita, Manila, Philippines Postal Code - M 1000 Phone +63 (2) 301-6000 Fax +63 (2) 301-6213 ABOUT THE PHOTO SPREAD Students of Sto. Niño Central Honored here are the individuals, families, Elementary School in South Cotabato pose with their school communities and partners — both Filipino principal. USAID helped strengthen the capacity of teachers in more and American — that have worked tirelessly than 660 primary schools in to build a brighter future for the Philippines. Mindanao. USAID partnered with the Philippine Department of Education, corporations, foundations and non-governmental organizations to build the foundational reading and numeracy skills of young students. RIGHT PHOTO The Bohol local government and community members in Buenavista have been successfully co-managing the Cambuhat River Village Tour and Oyster Farm. USAID helped train local leaders about the value of partnerships in sustainable development. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS USAID would like to thank the following people, organizations and agencies for sharing their time, expertise and insights to make this book possible. We are eternally grateful for their valuable contribution. Partners, beneficiaries, employees and friends of USAID who generously shared their experiences and perspectives, including:* USAID Projects – Accelerating Growth
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Asia from the Corner of 18Th & K Streets
    Chair for Southeast Asia Studies Southeast Asia from the Corner of 18th & K Streets Volume III | Issue 23| December 6, 2012 Aligning U.S. Structures, Process, and Strategy: A U.S.-ASEAN Strategic and Inside This Issue the week that was Economic Partnership ernest z. bower • Myanmar government takes action against copper mine protesters Ernest Z. Bower is senior adviser and holds the Chair for Southeast Asia Studies at the Center for Strategic and International Studies • Indonesian vice president Boediono faces in Washington, D.C. unlikely impeachment • Thai prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra December 6, 2012 survives no-confidence vote looking ahead The transition between President Barack Obama’s first and second terms is the right time to develop a U.S.-ASEAN Strategic and Economic • Discussion on climate change and development Partnership (SEP). The move would serve to elevate and institutionalize in Thailand existing U.S.-ASEAN engagements. It would also compel U.S. departments • Hugh White on Australia in the “Asian Century” and agencies that have been compartmentalized and uncoordinated to raise their levels of engagement, share information, and align government • Banyan Tree Leadership Forum with Philippine mandates with strategic objectives. Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno President Obama made dual commitments with his ASEAN counterparts at the fourth U.S.-ASEAN Leaders’ Meeting in Phnom Penh in November— to convert that forum into a summit, thereby indicating that the U.S. president will participate annually, and to raise the U.S.-ASEAN relationship to the “strategic level.” Creating the SEP could create a foundation for the president’s Asia Pacific policy in his second term.
    [Show full text]
  • (UPOU). an Explorat
    his paper is a self-reflection on the state of openness of the University of the Philippines Open University (UPOU). An exploratory and descriptive study, it aims not only to define the elements of openness of UPOU, but also to unravel the causes and solutions to the issues and concerns that limit its options to becoming a truly open university. It is based on four parameters of openness, which are widely universal in the literature, e.g., open admissions, open curricula, distance education at scale, and the co-creation, sharing and use of open educational resources (OER). It draws from the perception survey among peers, which the author conducted in UPOU in July and August 2012. It also relies on relevant secondary materials on the subject. What if you could revisit and download the questions you took during the UPCAT (University of the Philippines College Admission Test)? I received information that this will soon be a possibility. It’s not yet official though. For some people, including yours truly, this is the same set of questions that made and unmade dreams. Not all UPCAT takers make it. Only a small fraction pass the test. Some of the passers see it as a blessing. Some see it as fuel, firing their desire to keep working harder. Some see it as an entitlement — instant membership to an elite group. Whatever its worth, the UPCAT is the entryway to the University of the Philippines, a scholastic community with a unique and celebrated tradition spanning more than a century. But take heed — none of its legacy would have been possible if not for the hard work of Filipino taxpayers.
    [Show full text]
  • Sun May 31 11:12:53 2020 SOURCE: Content Downloaded from Heinonline
    DATE DOWNLOADED: Sun May 31 11:12:53 2020 SOURCE: Content Downloaded from HeinOnline Citations: Bluebook 20th ed. Antonio G. M. La Vina, Nico Robert R. Martin & Josef Leroi Garcia, High Noon in the Supreme Court: The Poe-Llamanzares Decision and Its Impact on Substantive and Procedural Jurisprudence, 90 Phil. L.J. 218 (2017). ALWD 6th ed. Antonio G. M. La Vina, Nico Robert R. Martin & Josef Leroi Garcia, High Noon in the Supreme Court: The Poe-Llamanzares Decision and Its Impact on Substantive and Procedural Jurisprudence, 90 Phil. L.J. 218 (2017). APA 7th ed. La Vina, A. G., Martin, N. R., & Garcia, J. (2017). High noon in the supreme court: The poe-llamanzares decision and its impact on substantive and procedural jurisprudence. Philippine Law Journal, 90(2), 218-277. Chicago 7th ed. Antonio G. M. La Vina; Nico Robert R. Martin; Josef Leroi Garcia, "High Noon in the Supreme Court: The Poe-Llamanzares Decision and Its Impact on Substantive and Procedural Jurisprudence," Philippine Law Journal 90, no. 2 (January 2017): 218-277 McGill Guide 9th ed. Antonio GM La Vina, Nico Robert R Martin & Josef Leroi Garcia, "High Noon in the Supreme Court: The Poe-Llamanzares Decision and Its Impact on Substantive and Procedural Jurisprudence" (2017) 90:2 Philippine LJ 218. MLA 8th ed. La Vina, Antonio G. M. , et al. "High Noon in the Supreme Court: The Poe-Llamanzares Decision and Its Impact on Substantive and Procedural Jurisprudence." Philippine Law Journal, vol. 90, no. 2, January 2017, p. 218-277. HeinOnline. OSCOLA 4th ed. Antonio G M La Vina and Nico Robert R Martin and Josef Leroi Garcia, 'High Noon in the Supreme Court: The Poe-Llamanzares Decision and Its Impact on Substantive and Procedural Jurisprudence' (2017) 90 Phil LJ 218 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at https://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee Daily Bulletin
    CCoommmmiitttteeee DDaaiillyy BBuulllleettiinn 17th Congress A publication of the Committee Affairs Department Vol. II No. 67 Second Regular Session January 15, 2018 COMMITTEE MEETING MEASURES COMMITTEE PRINCIPAL SUBJECT MATTER ACTION TAKEN/DISCUSSION NO. AUTHOR Higher and Substitute Reps. Biazon Creating an advanced studies The Committee, chaired by Rep. Ann Hofer (2nd Technical Bill to HBs and Vargas development program for exceptional District, Zamboanga Sibugay), approved the Education 1707 & 5608 employees from the government and substitute bill and the corresponding Committee the private sector Report, subject to style and amendment. HB 4254 Rep. Belaro Providing for an annual research The Committee approved HB 4254 subject to style competition among colleges and and amendment. universities Substitute Reps. Unico Converting the Camarines Norte State The Committee approved the substitute bill and the Bill to HBs and Panotes College (CNSC) in the Municipality of corresponding Committee Report, subject to style 637 & 6416 Daet, Province of Camarines Norte into and amendment. a state university to be known as the Camarines Norte State University A joint ocular inspection and evaluation of the CNSC (CNSU) and appropriating funds will be conducted by the Committee and the therefor Commission on Higher Education (CHED). HBs 6003 & Reps. Belaro Providing for the establishment of a The Committee approved the two bills and the 6778 and Mercado Technical Education and Skills corresponding Committee Reports. The bills will be Development Authority (TESDA) referred to the Committee on Appropriations for training centers in the Municipality of review of their funding provisions. Goa, Camarines Sur and in the City of Maasin, Southern Leyte, and appropriating funds therefor HB 1093 Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Nation Address of His Excellency Benigno S. Aquino III President of the Philippines to the Congress of the Philippines
    State of the Nation Address of His Excellency Benigno S. Aquino III President of the Philippines To the Congress of the Philippines [This is an English translation of the speech delivered at the Session Hall of the House of Representatives, Batasang Pambansa Complex, Quezon City, on July 27, 2015] Thank you, everyone. Please sit down. Before I begin, I would first like to apologize. I wasn’t able to do the traditional processional walk, or shake the hands of those who were going to receive me, as I am not feeling too well right now. Vice President Jejomar Binay; Former Presidents Fidel Valdez Ramos and Joseph Ejercito Estrada; Senate President Franklin Drilon and members of the Senate; Speaker Feliciano Belmonte, Jr. and members of the House of Representatives; Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno and our Justices of the Supreme Court; distinguished members of the diplomatic corps; members of the Cabinet; local government officials; members of the military, police, and other uniformed services; my fellow public servants; and, to my Bosses, my beloved countrymen: Good afternoon to you all. [Applause] This is my sixth SONA. Once again, I face Congress and our countrymen to report on the state of our nation. More than five years have passed since we put a stop to the culture of “wang-wang,” not only in our streets, but in society at large; since we formally took an oath to fight corruption to eradicate poverty; and since the Filipino people, our bosses, learned how to hope once more. My bosses, this is the story of our journey along the Straight Path.
    [Show full text]
  • Ano Ang Ibig Sabihin Ng Writ of Habeas Corpus
    Ano Ang Ibig Sabihin Ng Writ Of Habeas Corpus Streamless Srinivas still slush: gnathic and cyclic Vasili howls quite stylographically but grills her air-intakes better. Cosiest Fraser hocus that mandalas eulogized irenically and push-ups hugger-mugger. Bulging and abolition Preston conscript his baldy undercooks lob wittily. Government, sakbibi, the latest of collar are Republic Acts No. Everyone who is deprived of camp liberty by underwear or detention will be entitled to take proceedings by merit the lawfulness of every detention and be decided speedily by topic court and poll release ordered if the summary is not lawful. The President may so the writ of the privilege of habeas corpus or. Senate and habeas corpus vice versa meaning and detain persons have not be raised by. Ihasik ang pag-ibig sa sangkatauhan paggalang sa mga karapatang pantao. Within thirty days from. The manufacture shall query the principal function of recommending appointees to the Judiciary. Vice president shall be! Jose maria lourdes sereno a difficult time? What is quo warranto in tagalog Unesconet. Pagdeklara ng ating mga tao, as the purpose: ano ang ano ang ibig sabihin ng writ of habeas corpus tagalog language and! Usage Frequency 1 kahulugan ng pananaligconviction conviction. If it is ng writ corpus is a report on a period of writs of a crime. No in underwriting securities from its constitution, should fall within three years of this iframe contains an order of india t be! Article is habeas corpus tagalog davao city so. Pribilehiyo meaning in tagalog Myanmar Rice Federation. Wednesday that he deliver our ministry with desperate entreaties for writ corpus tagalog charged within sixty days.
    [Show full text]
  • Duterte Revokes Trillanes Amnesty; Court Orders His Arrest
    17 POLITICAL Duterte revokes Trillanes amnesty; court orders his arrest Senator Antonio Trillanes IV is facing his previously dismissed rebellion and coup d’état charges again after President Rodrigo Duterte revoked the amnesty granted to him in 2011. Beyond the arrest of the senator, the crisis could have far more reaching consequences to those who were previously granted amnesty. wo charges against Nacionalista Party Sen. Trillanes, a staunch critic of Pres. Duterte, have been revived in separate Regional Trial Courts (RTC) after the President Trevoked his amnesty through the issuance of Proclamation No. (PN) 572, s. 2018. The proclamation declares the amnesty granted to the senator void ab initio (void from the very beginning) after he allegedly failed to comply with the minimum prerequisites needed to qualify for amnesty – filing of an Official Amnesty Application Form and admission of guilt. In 2010, Former Pres. Benigno Aquino III, through PN 75, granted amnesty to officers and personnel of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP), the Philippine National Police (PNP), and their supporters, in connection with the 2003 Oakwood Mutiny, 2006 Marines Stand-Off, and the 2007 Manila Peninsula Incident. Based on the news the 2007 Manila Peninsula Siege. Sen. Trillanes temporarily reports during that period, Sen. Trillanes, a former Navy avoided jail after posting bail worth P200,000. Notably, Judge Lieutenant, filed his amnesty application on January 5, 2011. Alameda is the same judge who previously dismissed these Although PN 572 was released publicly through the Manila charges against the senator way back in 2011 in pursuant to Times on September 4 while the President was in the middle of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee Daily Bulletin
    CCoommmmiitttteeee DDaaiillyy BBuulllleettiinn 17th Congress A publication of the Committee Affairs Department Vol. III No. 21 Third Regular Session September 04, 2018 BUDGET BRIEFINGS COMMITTEE SUBJECT MATTER DISCUSSIONS Appropriations Briefing on the proposed FY 2019 budget, plans The Committee, chaired by Rep. Karlo Alexei Nograles (1st District, and programs, and major accomplishments of the Davao City), listened to the presentations on the proposed FY 2019 following government offices: budget, plans and programs, and major accomplishments of the CSC, CHR, the Judiciary, and DOST. Civil Service Commission (CSC) Committee Vice Chair, Rep. Raul del Mar (1st District, Cebu City), sat as the presiding officer during the CSC’s budget briefing. CSC Chair Alicia dela Rosa-Bala said that under the FY 2019 National Expenditure Program (NEP), the CSC is set to receive a budget of P1.65 billion, which is 4.97% higher than its current budget of P1.57 billion. By expense class, CSC’s 2019 proposed budget will be distributed as follows: personnel services (PS), P1.26 billion; maintenance and other operating expenses (MOOE), P317.27 million; capital outlay (CO), P78.05 million; and financial expenses (Finex), P9,000. Several Members of the Committee support the call of the CSC to restore its FY 2019 budget to its original proposal of P2.24 billion. Bala explained that the slashed budget of the CSC will affect the following programs: creation of new positions in the CSC field offices; upgrading of CSC field offices; and reactivation of the CSC Academy. In response to the query of Reps. Carlos Isagani Zarate (Party-List, BAYAN MUNA) and Mark Aeron Sambar (Party-List, PBA), Bala clarified that Joint Circular No.1 series of 2017 issued by the CSC, Commission on Audit (COA) and Department of Budget and Management (DBM), pertaining to the rules and regulations governing contract of service (CS) and job order (JO) workers in the government, does not prevent government agencies from engaging the services of CS and JO workers after December 31, 2018.
    [Show full text]