Wilson Angley •

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wilson Angley • A Brief Maritime History of the Oriental Area of Pamlico County . by Wilson Angley • A Brief Maritime History of the Oriental Area of Pamlico County by Wilson Angley 25 August 1987 Research Branch Division of Archives and History • :North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources In July of 1585 Sir Richard Grenville' s expedition sailed southward from the mouth of the Pamlico River am along the eastern shoreline of what • is now Pamlico County. This expedition aH?arently reached a point just be­ low the IOOuth of Broad Creek before turning northeastward toward the lower e m of Portsm:>uth Islam. Algonquian Imian towns then in existence in the present Pamlico County were Secotaoc, near Hobucken, am Pcm:mik, in the vicinity of Maribel. Both of these aboriginal settlements were situated north of the Bay River, a considerable distance from what is now the town of Oriental.1 In the mid-1950s archaeologist William G. Haag comucted an admittedly "cursory examination" of the Neuse River area from New Bern eastward to the Pamlico Soum. No aboriginal sites were identified in the Oriental vicini­ ty; however, Haag ' s survey was far from exhaustive, am he made particular mention of the fact that the north shore of the Neuse, like that of the 2 nearby Pamlico, was very rich in terms of its archaeological potential. '!here can be little doubt that the Neuse River am the creeks in the present Oriental area saw at least intermittent use by Algonquian groups am later by representatives of the Bay River tribe, which emured in the general vicinity until after the TUscarora Wars of 1711-1715. Arrl, imeed, during the 1970s it was reported that Wian artifacts hcrl been located along the shores of Whittaker Creek, which debouches into the Neuse River just east of Oriental.3 In the early years of the eighteenth century, historian am naturalist John Lawson reported that the Bay (or Bear} River Imians could ruster only 4 about fifty fighting men. 'Ibis tribe, however, hcrl been of sufficient importance to attract the diplomatic efforts of Carolina' s proprietary • govermtent as recently as 1699. Moreover, in light of the early shipwreck 2 recently located along the south bank of Greens Creek near Oriental, it • is perhaps significant that the agreement str uck that year with the Iooians had included a provision that they came to the assistance of shipwrecked mariners ar:rl aid in the safekeeping of salvaged cargoes. 5 App:irently, even then it was well recognized that the waters of Pamlico Sourrl aoo the lower Neuse could be perilous urrler adverse coooitions. Eighteenth-century maps of North Carolina give virtually no indication that the eastern shoreline of present-day Parnlico County was settled to any appreciable extent; yet this was precisely the area where settlement of the entire Neuse basin began. Indeed, the present Oriental area has been called the very "cradle of Neuse colonization. "6 'Ihe earliest known set­ tlers of this area included William Powell, 'Ihomas Lepper, Richard Smith, 'Ihomas Yeates, ar:rl Farnifold Green. 7 For many years the present Whittaker Creek was known as Powells Creek, after William Powell; aoo the names of Smith Creek ar:rl Greens Creek still commemorate their associations with Richard Smith ar:rl Farnifold Green.8 It is significant to note that William Powell was a shiprwright by trade at the time of his removal to the present Oriental area about 1703.9 It is at least possible that he continued the construction or rep:1ir of vessels in the new location. Richard Smith, moreover, is several times referred to in early records as "Capt. Richard Smith," although this may well connote a militia rank rather than a maritime occup:1tion.10 'lhe individual most instrunental in settling the present Oriental was, most probably, Farnifold Green, who obtained several large tracts of lar:rl there in the early years of the eighteenth century. In 1707 he received a • proprietary grant for some 1,700 acres of land between Greens and Smith 3 creeks; and it was here that he established his "Green's Neck" plantation. • In another of his several acquisitions of land, he received 640 acres "at Greens Point in Powells Creek in Neuse."11 As a praninent planter in the relatively sparsely settled area, Green was involved in nlllrerous land transactions and held the rank of captain in 12 the Bath County militia. On at least two occasions during the early days of the Tuscarora Wars, Green wrote to Virginia governor Alexander Spots­ wood, informing him of the plight of settlers on the lower Neuse and asking for his assistance.13 Following a renewal of violence in 1712, Green was appointed "Commissary to impress and supply the army with anything that is to be had in Bath County." Particularly needed, a:fP3rently, were large quantities of corn and other provisions to sustain colonial forces.14 It is entirely possible that Green's position as commissary gave rise to a small amount of early vessel traffic to and from his principal plantation on Greens Creek. It may well have been Green's leadership position that resulted final­ ly in retribution against Green himself, his family, and his plantation. In 1714 Indians launched a surprise attack, killing Green, one of his sons, a white servant, and two slaves. Another of his sons was wounded in the at­ tack, and his plantation and home on Greens Creek were laid waste.15 In the will that he had drawn sozre three years prior to his death, Green had provided that the "land in Greens Neck whereon I now live" should devolve to his sons JaJres and Farnifold II. As events unfolded, this land would remain in the hands of his descendants for more than a century to come. 16 It was not until after 1710 arrl the founding of New Bern that the • Smith Creek and nearby Wilkinson's Point areas were finally supplanted as 4 the focal points of settlE!!Ient on the Neuse River. Although the records • are not specific as to the route taken or the roode of transportation employed by the initial settlers of New Bern, it is probable that they proceeded past the mouth of Smith Creek am upriver to their final destina­ tion in small sailboats or shallops provided by Thomas Pollock in the Albemarle.17 These vessels were surely among the first to travel as far upstream as the New Bern area, but they were umoubtedly preceeded by canoes, periaugers, am other assorted craft on the lower Neuse am in the waters of the Pamlico Sourrl. The only vessel rrentioned by narre in connection with the early settle- rrent of New Bern was the sloop Returne, which was purchased for L200 by Baron Christopher de Graffenried' s associate, Franz Ludwig Michael. Plans were, in fact, made during the early days of the fledgling settlarent for extensive use of the Returne in the West Indian trade; am the vessel is known to have made at least one voyage to Bermuda early in 1711, j ust 18 ronths before the outbreak of the '1\lscarora Wars. In addition to the Returne, Graffenried am Michael also acquired a shallop (or barque) for use on the sourrls am rivers of the coastal region.19 Having gained some acquaintance with the comi tions of life i n the coastal region am with the heavy depemence of settlers on trade am transportation by water, Graffenried observed that it was an "absolute 20 necessity to keep shallops am boats upon the rivers. n Although SOJrewhat unrealistic as to its size, Graffenried also acknowledged the need for a larger, ocean-going vessel for use in nore extensive trade: It would be very useful to purchase a ship of about ninety tons burden. A ship with three masts is better than a brigantine, am when it is loaded it must not go deeper than eight feet in the water; • in fact a half foot less rather than more • • • • It trust be sheathed in 5 order to be assured against worms. These worms attack ships at all • tines fran May to September •••• When the ship is loaded arrl draws seven arrl a half, or at roost, eight feet, you can travel with it into the country arrl up into the Neuse. A little ship such as that strongly built of good wood arrl well nailed can always be used; sometitres to transport pork, beef, flour, cask staves, hoops, etc. , to the Barb<rlos; arrl fran there by barter, to take sugar, cotton, rum, rrolasses to Carolina; occasionally to carry Carolina goods to the Madeiras to excha!YJe for wine; to go occasionally, with a load of rice, hides, peltry, tar arrl pitch to Englarrl, to unload the tar, pitch, hides arrl peltry in a harbor in that country, but to bring the rice to Hollarrl arrl sell it; arrl so bring into Carolina all sorts of English goods, as iron ware, wooden stuff, duffles cloth, blankets for the savages, coarse linen, hats, stockings, yhoes, powder, shot, rm.lSkets arrl whatever else would be available. 2 If the recently discovered shipwreck near Oriental proves to date from the early eighteenth century, it is possible that it r epresents the remains of a vessel very similar to the ~:me described contemporaneously by Graffenried as being well suited to the Neuse River trade. The apparent age of the shipwreck has prompted at least some speculation that it might somehow have been associated with the nefarious activities of North Carolina's rrost notorious pirate, Blackbeard (Edward Teach). Follow- ing a brief but profitable period of piracy in the West Irrlies, arrl the daring blockade of the harbor at Charlestown, South Carolina, Blackbeard sailed northward along the Atlantic coastline to the present Beaufort Inlet, where he parted company with Stede Bonnet arrl disbarrled rrost of his follow­ ing of four hurrlred rren.
Recommended publications
  • Beacons of the Coast
    National Seashore National Park Service Cape Lookout U.S. Department of the Inerior Beacons of the Coast Over a century ago, mariners travelling along the Atlantic coast encountered dangerous shoals and treacherous storms. Their guides were the beacons of light produced by lighthouses which helped mariners navigate the perilous coastline. For mariners traveling along the North Carolina coast, seven lighthouse beacons were constructed to guide them through an area known as the “Graveyard of the Atlantic.” Hundreds of shipwrecks occurred due to the dangers of this area. Today, the ships traveling the coast use modern tools such as radar and sonar. The beacons continue to operate, standing as a reminder of the hardships encountered by our ancestors to help settle the country. These seven lighthouses found on the North Carolina coast stand as pieces of our past. CURRITUCK BEACH LIGHTHOUSE This lighthouse was constructed from 1874 - 1875, and it lit the last dark spot on the Carolina coast between the Cape Fear lighthouse in Virginia and Bodie Island. The red brick lighthouse rises 158 feet above sea level. Unlike many other lighthouses that received distinctive day marks, Currituck was not painted. But its red brick is unique on the Carolina coast. It has a short light signal: 5 seconds on, 15 seconds off. There is a Fresnel lens still working in the lighthouse and it is activated from dusk to dawn. Currituck Lighthouse is open 10-6 daily from Easter to Thanksgiving weekend. You can walk to the top of the lighthouse. BODIE ISLAND LIGHTHOUSE This was the third lighthouse to be built on Bodie Island (pronounced “body”) and was constructed in the early 1870’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Blackbeard and Shipwrecks - Ocracock Inlet
    Blackbeard and Shipwrecks - Ocracock Inlet This image depicts part of a map called Ocacock Inlet, including the following printed notation: "A 1733 chart of Ocracoke Inlet by Edward Moseley." (Note the different spellings of the inlet's name, including today's "Ocracoke"). The inlet, an estuary situated in the Outer Banks of North Carolina, connects the Atlantic Ocean to Pamlico Sound. It also separates the islands of Portsmouth and Ocracoke. This place was the scene of a battle, in 1718, between the British Royal Navy (led by Lieutenant Robert Maynard) and Edward Teach (the pirate known as "Blackbeard"). At the end of the fighting, the pirates had lost (and Blackheard’s severed head was on the bowsprit of Maynard's ship). This map is still an important resource. It allows modern researchers to examine how the Inlet has changed during hundreds of years. It also helps to explain why there have been so many shipwrecks in the area. We learn about that from NOAA (the U.S. federal government’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration): Ocracoke Inlet, North Carolina, is shown on Edward Moseley's map of 1733. This map, when compared with other historic maps, enabled researchers to determine how the inlet has changed over several hundred years. Some shipwrecks are no longer in or near the present inlet. The map clearly shows the obstructions at the mouth of the inlet that caused numerous ships to run aground. In fact, there have been so many shipwrecks in this area that we now have an “Ocracoke Shipwreck Survey.” Ocean Explorer, part of NOAA’s website, tells us about the survey: An extraordinary increase in the number of identified shipwreck sites since the beginning of the Ocracoke Shipwreck Survey has led to the development of a Geographic Information System (GIS), which can provide overlays of data by location, date, ship type, and other criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Drum, Sciaenops Ocellatus, Tagging in North Carolina Waters
    RED DRUM, SCIAENOPS OCELLATUS, TAGGING IN NORTH CAROLINA WATERS by Jeffrey L. Ross Tonya M. Stevens Sean A. McKenna and Beth L. Burns August 1987 North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development Division of Marine Fisheries P.O. Box 769 Morehead City, NC 28557 This project was conducted under the Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Act (Dingell-Johnson Act) through the Wallop-Breaux Amendment, and funded, in part, by the U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under Project No. F-29-1. RED DRUM TAGGING PROJECT IN NORTH CAROLINA WATERS Tagging of red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus, in North Carolina in 1986 proceeded along two avenues which will be described in separate sections of this report due to a) the different tags used; b) the different gears employed; c) the different personnel employed; and d) the different locations fished. The first section describes an intensive tagging program for yearling drum in the Pamlico River conducted for the first time in 1986 by DMF personnel in cooperation with local commercial fishermen. The second section presents results of tagging by sport fishermen cooperating with the Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF). This is the third year (and third annual report) of this cooperative program (Ross and Burns 1986). Most of this tagging activity takes place along the North Carolina coastal shorelines and on a broad size range of fish. Both of these tagging projects are continuing in 1987. SECTION 1 COOPERATIVE RECREATIONAL FISHERMEN TAGGING PROGRAM INTRODUCTION A preliminary investigation into the feasibility of tagging red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus, was begun in the fall of 1983 and tagging has continued through the 1986 fishing season (Ross and Burns, 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Article to Where Is the Lost Colony?
    Challenges to living by the sea A supplement to the serial story, Where is The Lost Colony? written by Sandy Semans, editor, Outer Banks Sentinel The thin ribbon of sand that forms the chain of islands known as the Outer Banks is bounded on the east by the Atlantic Ocean and on the west by the sounds. The shapes of the islands and the inlets that run between them continue to be altered by hurricanes, nor’easters and other weather events. Inlets that often proved to be moving targets created access to the ocean and the sounds. Inlets were formed and then later filled with sand and disappeared. Maps of the coastline show many places named “New Inlet,” although currently there is no inlet there. The one exception has been Ocracoke Inlet between Ocracoke and Portsmouth islands. Marine geologists estimate that the existing inlet — with some minor changes — has been in place for at least 2500 years. During the English exploration of the 1500’s, most likely the ships came through this inlet, making it a long sail to Roanoke Island. At that time, there was a small shallow inlet between Hatteras and Ocracoke islands, but the shallow inlet probably was avoided for fear of going aground. By the early 1700s, this inlet had filled in, and the two became just one long island. But in 1846, a hurricane created two major inlets. One, now called Oregon Inlet, sliced through the sand, leaving today’s Pea Island to the south and Bodie Island to the north. And a second inlet, now known as Hatteras Inlet, once again separated Hatteras Island from Ocracoke Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuscarora Trails: Indian Migrations, War, and Constructions of Colonial Frontiers
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2007 Tuscarora trails: Indian migrations, war, and constructions of colonial frontiers Stephen D. Feeley College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Feeley, Stephen D., "Tuscarora trails: Indian migrations, war, and constructions of colonial frontiers" (2007). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539623324. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-4nn0-c987 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Tuscarora Trails: Indian Migrations, War, and Constructions of Colonial Frontiers Volume I Stephen Delbert Feeley Norcross, Georgia B.A., Davidson College, 1996 M.A., The College of William and Mary, 2000 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the College of William and Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Lyon Gardiner Tyler Department of History The College of William and Mary May, 2007 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. APPROVAL SHEET This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Stephen Delbert F eele^ -^ Approved by the Committee, January 2007 MIL James Axtell, Chair Daniel K. Richter McNeil Center for Early American Studies 11 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • The Living History Classroom (Fall 2015)
    FALL 2015 Living History CLASSROOM Through the Wilderness Exploring North Carolina with Lawson, Tuscarora & the First Printing Press A Publication of Tryon Palace “The State of North Carolina from the best Authorities &c.” is a map drawn by Samuel Lewis in 1795. Does it look different from the North Carolina we see today? Mapping Our State Words to Know When traveling today, many of us chart our course by using , which GPS GPS: short for Global Positioning System, relies on information from satellites and maps to make sure we arrive at which uses satellites and maps to determine our intended destination. People living in the 17th and 18th centuries location could not use a computer system. To find their way, they relied on Cartography: the science of making maps for paper maps. defined transportation routes used to trade Cartography is a skill that combines mathematics, geography, and art goods on land and waterways to produce a physical map of the earth. Accurate maps define boundaries Cartographer: a person who combines and settle arguments over land. They also show dangerous waters and observation, math, and drawing to make maps coastlines to help save the lives of sailors. Land surveyor: a person whose job is to Cartographers in the 1600s and 1700s often used surveying skills. measure and examine an area of land Land surveyors used chains to measure the distance between two points. Theodolite: a surveying tool made from a Surveyor’s chains were 66 feet long with 100 links. Each link was about 8 telescope, it sits on a tripod and measures inches long.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Onboard Training, Measures, New Requirements
    Merchant Marine Academy of Makedonia Dissertation: Security Onboard Training, Measures, New Requirements Floros Dimitrios Supervising Professor: Papaleonida Paraskevi Thessaloniki, September 2015 ΑΚΑΔΗΜΙΑ ΕΜΠΟΡΙΚΟΥ ΝΑΥΤΙΚΟΥ Α.Ε.Ν ΜΑΚΕΔΟΝΙΑΣ ΕΠΙΒΛΕΠΩΝ ΚΑΘΗΓΗΤΗΣ: ΠΑΠΑΛΕΩΝΙΔΑ ΠΑΡΑΣΚΕΥΉ ΘΕΜΑ Security onboard: training, measures, new requirements. ΤΟΥ ΣΠΟΥΔΑΣΤΗ: ΦΛΩΡΟΥ ΔΗΜΗΤΡΙΟΥ Α.Γ.Μ: 3392 Ημερομηνία ανάληψης της εργασίας: Ημερομηνία παράδοσης της εργασίας: Α/Α Ονοματεπώνυμο Ειδικότης Αξιολόγηση Υπογραφή 1 2 3 ΤΕΛΙΚΗ ΑΞΙΟΛΟΓΗΣΗ Ο ΔΙΕΥΘΥΝΤΗΣ ΣΧΟΛΗΣ : 2 Contents 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................................5 2. International Ship and Port Facility Security Code..........................................................................6 2.1 History..........................................................................................................................7 2.2 Scope...........................................................................................................................7 2.3 Requirements...............................................................................................................7 2.4 National Implementation...............................................................................................8 Europe...........................................................................................................................................8 United Kingdom...........................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Going on the Account: Examining Golden Age Pirates As a Distinct
    GOING ON THE ACCOUNT: EXAMINING GOLDEN AGE PIRATES AS A DISTINCT CULTURE THROUGH ARTIFACT PATTERNING by Courtney E. Page December, 2014 Director of Thesis: Dr. Charles R. Ewen Major Department: Anthropology Pirates of the Golden Age (1650-1726) have become the stuff of legend. The way they looked and acted has been variously recorded through the centuries, slowly morphing them into the pirates of today’s fiction. Yet, many of the behaviors that create these images do not preserve in the archaeological environment and are just not good indicators of a pirate. Piracy is an illegal act and as a physical activity, does not survive directly in the archaeological record, making it difficult to study pirates as a distinct maritime culture. This thesis examines the use of artifact patterning to illuminate behavioral differences between pirates and other sailors. A framework for a model reflecting the patterns of artifacts found on pirate shipwrecks is presented. Artifacts from two early eighteenth century British pirate wrecks, Queen Anne’s Revenge (1718) and Whydah (1717) were categorized into five groups reflecting behavior onboard the ship, and frequencies for each group within each assemblage were obtained. The same was done for a British Naval vessel, HMS Invincible (1758), and a merchant vessel, the slaver Henrietta Marie (1699) for comparative purposes. There are not enough data at this time to predict a “pirate pattern” for identifying pirates archaeologically, and many uncontrollable factors negatively impact the data that are available, making a study of artifact frequencies difficult. This research does, however, help to reveal avenues of further study for describing this intriguing sub-culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Penne Smith's Research on Island Farm
    ILLUSTRATIONS TO TEXT Fig. 1: Dough-Hayman-Drinkwater House, front elevation, ca. 1945 (at present site; original porch removed). Paneled door is original. Outer Banks History Center, Manteo, NC. Fig. 2: Meekins Homeplace, side elevation ca. 1915. D. Victor Meekins Collection, Outer Banks History Center, Manteo, NC Fig. 3: Christaina (“Crissy”) Bowser, ca. 1910. D. Victor Meekins Collection, Outer Banks History Center, Manteo, NC. N.B. The simple stoop entrance and rough board-and-batten exterior in the background; this has been assumed to have been Crissy Bowser’s cabin on the Etheridge Farm. Fig. 4: Thomas A. Dough, Grave Marker. Etheridge Family Cemetery, Manteo, NC (Penne Smith, 1999 photograph) Fig. 5: Detail of Thomas A. Dough Grave Marker (Penne Smith, 1999 photograph) Fig. 6: Aufustus H. Etheridge Business Card, 1907. Etheridge Family Collection, Outer Banks Conservationists, Inc. Fig. 7: Front elevation of Etheridge House, May 1999 (Penne Smith, photographer) Fig. 8: 1890s rear ell of Etheridge House, May 1999 (Penne Smith, photographer) Fig. 9: Capt. L. J. Pugh House, Wanchese, NC, July 1999 (Penne Smith, photographer) This graceful Victorian farmhouse may have been what the Etheridge 1890s rrenovation aspired to. Fig. 11: Dough-Hayman-Drinkwater House, front and side elevations, ca. 1940. Roger Meekins Collection, Outer Banks History Center, Manteo, NC Fig. 13: Dough-Hayman-Drinkwater House,rear and side elevations, ca. 1940. Roger Meekins Collection, Outer Banks History Center, Manteo, NC. N.B. the door surround at the side elevation. Fig. 14: United States Coast Guard, 1957 aerial map of Roanoke Island, detail of Etheridge Homeplace farmstead. Cartography Division, National Archives, College Park, MD Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Hatteras National Seashore Long-Range Interpretive Plan 0065960
    0065959 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cape Hatteras National Seashore North Carolina Cape Hatteras National Seashore Long-Range Interpretive Plan 0065960 Cover Photo: Bodie Island Lighthouse is one of three lighthouses preserved within the 30,320 acres of Cape Hatteras National Seashore. 0065961 Cape Hatteras National Seashore Long-Range Interpretive Plan Prepared by the Department of Interpretive Planning Harpers Ferry Center and Cape Hatteras National Seashore September 2007 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 0065962 Contents Introduction 1 Executive Summary 2 Foundation for Planning 4 Legislative Background 4 Purpose 4 Significance 6 Interpretive Themes 7 Management Goals 12 Visitor Experience Goals 13 Visitor Profiles 15 Issues and Influences 22 Existing Conditions 33 Interpretive Facilities owned by NPS and Partners 34 Media Conditions 36 Interpretive Programs 44 Recommendations 49 Personal Services 49 Non-Personal Services 51 Partnerships 58 Collection and Archive Needs 59 Research Needs 60 Staffing Needs 62 Implementation Plan 65 Appendices 73 Appendix A: Planning Team 73 Appendix B: Enabling Legislation 74 Appendix C: Media Accessibility Guidelines 75 0065963 CAPE HATTERAS NATIONAL SEASHORE 0065964 INTRODUCTION Within the planning hierarchy of the This LRIP will guide the interpre- National Park Service (NPS), a tive staff at Cape Hatteras National park’s General Management Plan Seashore over the next five to seven (GMP) guides park management years in their efforts to orient visi- decisions over a 20-year period. A tors to the Seashore’s recreational new GMP for Cape Hatteras opportunities and interpret its National Seashore is scheduled for natural history and human history 2010 or 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Tidal Datum Changes Induced by Morphological Changes of North Carolina Coastal Inlets
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Tidal Datum Changes Induced by Morphological Changes of North Carolina Coastal Inlets Jindong Wang 1,2,* and Edward Myers 1 1 Coast Survey Development Laboratory, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA; [email protected] 2 Earth Resources Technology, Inc., 14401 Sweitzer Lane, Suite 300, Laurel, MD 20707, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-301-713-2809 Academic Editor: Richard P. Signell Received: 18 July 2016; Accepted: 12 November 2016; Published: 18 November 2016 Abstract: In support of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s VDatum program, a new version of a tidal datum product for the North Carolina coastal waters has been developed to replace the initial version released in 2004. Compared with the initial version, the new version used a higher resolution grid to cover more areas and incorporated up-to-date tide, bathymetry, and shoreline data. Particularly, the old bathymetry datasets that were collected from the 1930s to the 1970s and were used in the initial version have been replaced by the new bathymetry datasets collected in the 2010s in the new version around five North Carolina inlets. This study aims at evaluating and quantifying tidal datum changes induced by morphological changes over about 40 to 80 years around the inlets. A series of tidal simulations with either the old or new bathymetry datasets used around five inlets were conducted to quantify the consequent tidal datum changes. The results showed that around certain inlets, approximately 10% change in the averaged depth could result in over 30% change in the tidal datum magnitude.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of NC Shipwrecks with an Emphasis on Eighteenth-Century
    Queen Anne’s Revenge Shipwreck Project RESEARCH REPORT AND BULLETIN SERIES QAR-R-08-01 An Overview of North Carolina Shipwrecks with an Emphasis on Eighteenth Century Vessel Losses at Beaufort Inlet Richard W. Lawrence NC Underwater Archaeology Branch June 2008 Underwater Archaeology Branch Office of State Archaeology Department of Cultural Resources State of North Carolina Introduction In the most elementary terms, the number of shipwrecks in any given body of water or stretch of coastline can be attributed to the interaction of two factors: the frequency of vessel traffic, and the presence of navigational hazards. For example, the same number of ships involved in coastal trade off the North Carolina coast travel past Cape Hatteras, Cape Lookout, and Cape Fear. Due to the environmental conditions discussed below, however, five times as many vessels have been lost at Cape Hatteras and along the northern Outer Banks than in the vicinity of the other two capes. In considering the North Carolina coast, geomorphology, ocean currents, storm patterns, and trade routes all bear discussion as to their influence on shipping and the occurrence of shipwrecks. Geomorphology A 175-mile long chain of barrier islands known as the Outer Banks forms the northern coastline of North Carolina. From the Virginia border, the Outer Banks run in a southeasterly direction until reaching Cape Hatteras, where the shoreline turns to the southwest until reaching Cape Lookout. Figure 1 Map of Coastal North Carolina (Google 2005) QAR-R-08-01 Lawrence 2 The eastward projection of the Outer Banks creates a vast estuary of sounds (Currituck, Albemarle, Roanoke, Croatan, Pamlico, and Core) fed by river systems (Chowan, Roanoke, Tar, and Neuse) and numerous coastal creeks.
    [Show full text]