Journal of Oral Health ORIGINAL ARTICLE Community& Dentistry An In Vitro Microbiological Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Soluneem (A Water Soluble Neem Formulation from ) Against Periodontopathic Microorganisms

Shefali Sharma1, Suchetha A2, Vijayendra R3, Bharwani Ashit G4

ABSTRACT Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of Soluneem (a water soluble formulation from the neem seed kernel from Azadirachta Indica containing Azadirachtin) as an antimicrobial agent and the effective concentration of Soluneem required to inhibit periodontopathic bacteria and to compare it with a known antiplaque agent chlorhexidine (0.2%) in vitro. Material and Methods: The subgingival plaque samples from a total of 20 sites from 5 patients (4 sites per patient) was taken with a probing pocket depth of >”5mm. Subgingival plaque samples were collected, cultivated, and incubated anaerobically as per the standard procedure. Further subculturing was done to obtain pure growth. Various biochemical tests were used for identifying each organism as per the standard protocol. The sensitivity to the varying concentrations of neem like 100%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25%, 3.125% and 1.5625% and 0.2% Chlorhexidine solution was tested using the Modified Disc diffusion method. The sensitivity was tested by measuring the zones of inhibition comparing with the known standard diameter. Results: The organisms isolated and percentage of identification rate from total of five patients was 60% for Bacteroids fragilis, 40% for Bacteroids distasonis, 20% for Prevotella corporis, 20% for Prevotella melaninogenica, and 20% for Peptostreptococus . Chlorhexidine 0.2 % was effective against micro organisms cultivated and isolated in this study. However Soluneem was not effective against the organisms cultivated in this study. Conclusion: Soluneem had no effect on the growth of any of the isolated organisms. Further studies testing soluneem against other putative periodontal pathogens with Azadirachtin are warranted.

Keywords: Azadirachtin, Microbial sensitivity testing, Soluneem, Zone of inhibition.

INTRODUCTION 1M.D.S Senior Lecturer 2M.D.S, Professor and Head Dept. of Periodontia Dept. of Periodontics he development of chemothera Seema Dental College and Hospital, D.A. Pandu Memorial R.V. Dental College, peutic agents capable of inhibiting Rishikesh, Bangalore, India Tdental plaque formation has been 3M.D.S, Former Head of Department, of great interest to dental researchers and Contact Author Dept of Periodontics clinical dentists over the past decade (1). In D.A. Pandu Memorial R.V. Dental College, Bangalore, India the recent years, human pathogenic micro- Dr. Bharwani Ashit G organisms have developed resistance in re- [email protected] 4Post Graduate student, Dept. of Periodontics D.A. Pandu Memorial R.V. Dental College, sponse to the indiscriminate and long term J Oral Health Comm Dent 2012;6(1)4-9 Bangalore, India use of antimicrobial drugs commonly

4 JOHCD  www.johcd.org  January 2012;6(1) AN IN VITRO MICROBIOLOGICAL STUDY EVALUATING THE EFFICACY OF SOLUNEEM

employed in the treatment of infectious Earlier preparations from the Neem seed biotic treatment for any purpose in the past diseases. The undesirable side effect of cer- kernel were available as emulsified concen- 6 months including the use of mouth- tain antibiotics, and the emergence of previ- trates and required many solvents. These wash were excluded from the study. ously uncommon infections, has made the degrade very quickly in the presence of wa- scientists to look for new antimicrobial sub- ter or sunlight. Soluneem is highly stable STUDY DESIGN stances of alternate sources like plant origin. even at 1100C, whereas technically Neem The study was carried out using 20 sub- Therefore plants represent a potential source Seed Kernel Extracts (NSKE) is thermola- gingival plaque samples from patients di- of new anti-infective agents (2). bile. The unique advantage of this prepa- agnosed with chronic periodontitis. The Indians have used herbal products for oral ration is that it is a water soluble formula- subgingival plaque samples from peri- care for centuries. Most common ones be- tion which will have, a potentiated action odontal pockets >” 5mm were collected. ing extracts of Mango (Mangifera indica), and it contains the compound azadirachtin Supragingival plaque was removed with Neem (Azadirachta indica; Melia azadirachta), (9). hand instruments and the subgingival and Tea-dust (Camellia sinensis) (3).The plaque was collected by inserting a steri- most widely used herbal product among The insecticidal activity of this product has lized Gracey curette (Area-specific curette) them is Neem and its products. The Neem been confirmed and it has been suggested into the deepest portion of the periodon- twig has been used from time immemorial that it may have other applications in the tal pocket (13). for cleansing the teeth and the juice extracted field of personal care. In the present study by it’s chewing was believed to be beneficial an attempt has been made to explore the The plaque samples collected were plated for toning the gums (4).The widespread use effective concentration of Soluneem re- immediately onto 5% sheep blood agar, of the Neem “chewing stick” as an oral hy- quired to inhibit periodontopathic micro- Brucella Blood Agar (BBA) and Kanamy- giene device in certain Asian and African organisms and to compare Soluneem with cin Vancomycin Laked Blood Agar countries has suggested that it may possess antibacterial efficacy of chlorhexidine which (KVLBA) using sterile nichrome wire loop some anti-plaque properties also. Dentists is considered as the gold standard in peri- (14).This was immediately transferred into in areas where it is in use , have noted its odontics (12). an anaerobic jar with gas pack system (Fig- effectiveness in preventing certain plaque- ure-1). The sheep blood agar plates were related dental diseases (1). MATERIALS AND METHODS incubated aerobically at 37oC for 72 hrs; Patients diagnosed with chronic periodon- BBA and KVLBA were incubated anaero- Several studies have reported the antibac- titis and attending the Department of Peri- bically at 37 oC for 72 hours. terial effects of chewing sticks on odontics, D.A.P.M.R.V. Dental College, periodontotal pathogens particularly Bangalore, formed the study group. The gram stain smear from each patient Bacteriodes species and inhibitory action was examined for the presence of bacteria on dental plaque formation (1,4,5,6). Patients were explained about the purpose and pus cells (15) (Figure-2). Individual of the investigation and a written consent colony morphotypes were subcultured The quest for identifying the various was taken prior to commencement of the onto Chocolate Agar (aerobic inoculation chemotherapeutic agents in neem has led study. Ethical clearance was obtained by the for aerotolerance) and Brucella Blood Agar to the isolation of more than 135 com- ethical committee of the institution. enriched with Vitamin-K and Heame for pounds. The compounds have been di- obtaining pure growth. These were fur- vided into two major classes: isoprenoids Commercially available Chlorhexidine with and others. The isoprenoids includes a concentration of 0.2% (w/v) was selected azadirachtin (7). for the study to be compared for its efficacy with Soluneem. Azadirachtin has been found to inhibit enzymatic activity of larvae of Drosophila INCLUSION CRITERIA melanogaster, adult female Aedes aegypti, Patient aged 30-55 years with a diagnosis the larvae of Manduca sexta(8) and black- of chronic periodontitis; free from systemic headed caterpillar (9).The Neem seed ker- disease and who had not undergone any nel extracts and oil containing azadirachtin form of non surgical/surgical periodontal has shown antibacterial activity and activity therapy in the last 6 months were included against dermatophytes (10,11).One such in the study. example of a compound containing azadirachtin is SoluneemTM. Soluneem is a EXCLUSION CRITERIA water soluble formulation from the neem Patient with a known systemic disorder, seed kernel from Azadirachta Indica con- pregnant women, smokers, and patients Figure 1: Anaerobic jar with gas taining Azadirachtin –A 6%. who received any topical or systemic anti- pack system

JOHCD  www.johcd.org  January 2012;6(1) 5 AN IN VITRO MICROBIOLOGICAL STUDY EVALUATING THE EFFICACY OF SOLUNEEM

zone of inhibition was >” 6.1 mm colonies; few black pigmented colonies on (18).The standard strain ATCC Bacteroides Kanamycin Vancomycin laked Blood agar fragilis was included for biochemical reac- were also seen. The anaerobes identified tions and sensitivity testing (14). were- Prevotella corporis, Prevotella melaninogenica, Bacteroids distasonis, Bacteroids RESULTS fragilis, and Peptostreptococus species. Dental plaque inoculated from the sam- ples gave a confluent growth with varied The percentage of identification rate from

TABLE 1: BIOCHEMICAL TESTS Table 1.1: Biochemical tests of Prevotella corporis (+) → Positive and (-) → Negative Prevotella Corporis Figure 2: Gram stain smear to Indole Nit Bile Broth Glucose Sucrose Malt detect presence of bacteria and pus cells ññResistant + + + Lactose Arabinose Rhamnose Trehalose Salicin Esculin ther identified using standard biochemical ññññññ tests which included: Indole production, - Nitrate reduction, Aesculin hydrolysis, Table 1.2: Biochemical tests of Prevotella melaninogenicas Growth in Bile, Fermentation Tests–Glu- (+) → Positive and (-) → Negative cose, Sucrose, Malt, lactose, Rhamnose, Prevotella Melaninogenica galactose, Arabinose, Salicin, mannitol, and Indole Nitrate Bile Broth Glucose Sucrose Malt trehalose. Aerobic bacteria were also iden- tified as a part of the project using stand- ññResistant + + + ard methods (16,17). Lactose Arabinose Rhamnose Trehalose Salicin Esculin –––+–– For sensitivity testing 3-4 identical colo- nies were inoculated into anaerobic basal Table 1.3: Biochemical tests of Bacteroides distasonis broth incubated for 4-6 hrs at 37° C. Bru- (+) → Positive and (-) → Negative cella blood agar plates were inoculated us- Bacteroides Distasonis ing a sterile cotton swab. Indole Nitrate Bile Broth Glucose Sucrose Malt

The sensitivity to 0.2% Chlorhexidine and ññSensitive + + + varying concentrations of neem like 100%, Lactose Arabinose Rhamnose Trehalose Salicin Esculin 50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25%, 3.125% and +ññ+++ 1.5625% was tested. The plates were incu- bated at 37°C for 48 hrs anaerobically and Table 1.4: Biochemical tests of Bacteroides fragilis → → the zones of inhibition were recorded and (+) → Positive and (-) → Negative interpreted comparing with the standard. Bacteroides Fragilis Modified Disc diffusion method on Bru- Indole Nitrate Bile Broth Glucose Sucrose Malt cella Blood Agar plates was used. _ _ Sensitive + + + Preparation of dilutions of Lactose Arabinose Rhamnose Trehalose Salicin Esculin Soluneem powder +ñññññ The dilutions of the Soluneem powder was made by first preparing a saturated Table 1.5: Biochemical tests of Peptostreptococcus solution of the powder in distilled water, (+) → Positive and (-) → Negative that is taken as 100%, and further dilu- Peptostreptococcus Species tions were made from the standard satu- Indole Nitrate Bile Broth Glucose Sucrose Malt rated solution of 100%. _ _ Resistant + + + The organisms were found sensitive to Lactose Arabinose Rhamnose Trehalose Salicin Esculin Chlorhexidine 0.2% if the diameter of ññññññ

6 JOHCD  www.johcd.org  January 2012;6(1) AN IN VITRO MICROBIOLOGICAL STUDY EVALUATING THE EFFICACY OF SOLUNEEM

tern with the antibiotics, chlorhexidine and Soluneem.

DISCUSSION The local application of antimicrobial agents suppresses periodontal pathogens and increases the clinical and microbial ben- efits of mechanical debridement. Topical treatment with 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate has been found to be particu- larly effective for the control of supragingival plaque to cause positive clini- cal and microbiologic periodontal changes (19). The undesirable side effect of certain antibiotics, and the emergence of previ- ously uncommon infections, has forced scientists to look for new antimicrobial Figure 3: Anaerobic Organisms Identified and the Percentage of anaerobic substances from various sources, such as organisms isolated from the patient sample (no.=5) in the study. medicinal plants (4).In this study, subgin- total of five patients was- 20% for Prevotella  Prevotella melaninogenica and cor- gival plaque from a total of 20 sites from 5 corporis, 20% for Prevotella melaninogenica, poris was sensitive to chlorhexidine. patients (4 sites per patient) was taken. Four 60% for Bacteroids distasonis, 60% for Prevotella species were resistant to sites from each patient was taken, since it Bacteroids fragilis, and 20% for 100%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25%, has been shown that four individual sub- Peptostreptococus species. 3.125%, and 1.5625% neem concentra- gingival specimens, each from the deepest Table 1 shows the results of the biochemi- tions. periodontal pocket in each quadrant, cal tests used for identification. Graph 1  Peptostreptococci was sensitive to should be pooled to be able to detect high- shows the anaerobic isolates obtained. chlorhexidine, resistant to neem con- est amount of periodontal pathogens  Microbial sensitivity testing: The centrations. (20).The same number of sites were also microbial sensitivity testing showed:  ATCC Bacteroides fragilis was found taken in a study by Wennstrom et al (21).  Bacteroides fragilis and distasonis to be sensitive to chlorhexidine, but was found to be sensitive to resistant to 100%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, The predominant isolate in this study was chlorhexidine, but resistant to neem 6.25%, 3.125%, and 1.5625% neem of Bacteroides species - Bacteroids fragilis. concentrations of 100%, 50%, 25%, concentration. This was in accordance with study by Dzink 12.5%, 6.25%, 3.125%, and 1.5625% Table 2 gives the microbial sensitivity pat- and Tanner et al,. wherein Bacteroides spe-

Table 2: Microbial sensitivity pattern with Soluneem and chlorhexidine

Neem 100% 50% 25% 12.50% 6.25% 3.13% 1.56% Chlorhexidine

Pt1 Prevotella meloninogenica R R RRRR R S Bacteroides distasonis R R RRRR R S

Pt2 Bacteroides fragilis R R RRRR R S Bacteroides distasonis R R RRRR R S

Pt3 Pepto streptococci species R R RRRR R S

Pt4 Bacteroides fragilis R R RRRR R S

Pt5 Prevotella corporis R R RRRR R S Bacteroides fragilis R R RRRR R S Bacteroides fragilis ATCC R R RRRR R S (R-Resistant, S-Sensitive)

JOHCD  www.johcd.org  January 2012;6(1) 7 AN IN VITRO MICROBIOLOGICAL STUDY EVALUATING THE EFFICACY OF SOLUNEEM

cies were detected more often in active than All isolated organisms were found resist- 2. Firas A, AL-Bayati, Khudir D. Sulaiman. in inactive sites (22). Another study by Ali to neem formulation. In another study In vitro antimicrobial activity of Salvadora persica L. extracts against some isolated R.W et al. has found a significant correla- the authors tested for the antimicrobial ef- oral pathogens in Iraq. Turk J Biol tion between the presence of these species fect of the aqueous extract of seven differ- 2008;32:57-62. and pocket depth. Hence plaque from ent types of chewing sticks. The study also 3. Patel VK, Bhatt HV. Folklore therapeutic deeper samples will contain larger quantity included the extracts of azadirachta indica indigenous plants in periodontal disorders in India (review, experimental and clinical of Bacteroides species (23). (neem). Their result showed no antimi- approach). Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther crobial effect of neem even upto 50% con- Toxicol 1988;26(4):176-84. The finding of the study was in contrast centration (6). However these studies were 4. D’Silva I, Magar B. The effect of neem gel to other studies where 64% of active sites, based on the extracts of chewing sticks and on plaque and gingivitis. J Indian Soc Periodontol 1999;2(2). 35.7% of inactive sites and 38.5% of the present study used the neem seed ker- 5. Khalid A. The antimicrobial effects of healthy sites yielded black-pigmented nel extract containing Azadirachtin 6%. extracts of Azadirachta indica (Neem) anaerobes ( P.gingivalis Prevotella intermedia, and Salvadora persica (Arak) chewing Prevotella nigrescens) (24,25). There is also It has been reported in a study that the sticks. Indian J Dent Res 1999;10(1): 23-26. moderate evidence to consider components from neem and seeds 6. Khalid A. The antimicrobial effects of Peptostreptococcus micros as a putative assayed did not show anti-adherence activ- seven different types of Asian chewing periopathogen (26).This organism was ity of bacteria although the extract from sticks. Odontostomatol Trop 2001;96: also isolated in 20% of the samples. neem bark did exhibit the property against 17-20. 7. Biswas K, Chattopadhyay I, Banerjee bacterial adherence (1). RK, Bandyopadhyay U. Biological In advanced adult periodontitis, the culti- activities and medicinal properties of vable flora is comprised mainly of gram- Despite the observation that the formula- neem (Azadirachta indica). Current negative anaerobic rods (75%). P.gingivalis, tion under study had no antibacterial effect Science 2002;82(11):1336-45. 8. Mitchell MJ, Smith SL, Johnson S, et al. P.melaninogenicus subspecies intermedius on microorganisms cultivated in this study, Effects of the neem tree compounds and Fusobacterium nucleatum are the most the use of neem for oral home care cannot azadirachtin, salannin, nimbin, and 6- prominent isolates from advanced lesions be completely rejected, for the fact remains desacetylnimbin on ecdysone 20- (27). Prevotella melaninogenica was also iden- that neem products in different forms have monooxygenase activity. Arch Biochem Physiol 1997;35(1-2):199-209. tified in our study. been effective as antiplaque and 9. Shivashankar T, Annadurai RS, Srinivas antigingivitis agents (1,4). M, Preethi G, Sharada TB, Another interesting incidental observation Paramashivappa R, et al. Control of is the presence of Prevotella corporis in the The various reasons for the Soluneem ex- black-headed caterpillar ( arenosella Walker) by systemic samples. Prevotella corporis is normally as- hibiting no antimicrobial activity could be application of ‘Soluneem’ - A new water- sociated with endodontic flora (28).There that there may be other unidentified com- soluble neem insecticide formulation. are very few reports on its presence in peri- ponents in neem products that are effec- Current science 2000;78(2):176-78. odontal pocket, one study reported its pres- tive and yet to be identified. The DNA of 10. Natarajan V, Venugopal PV, Menon T. Effect of azadirachta indica (neem) on ence in few samples (29). periodontal pathogen may not be suscep- the growth pattern of dermatophytes. tible. Other components from neem plant Indian J Med Microbiol 2003;21(2):98- The reason for the isolation of the limited may be effective as antiplaque and 101. species of organisms could have been due antigingivitis agents or have inhibitory ac- 11. Das BK, Mukherjee SC, Sahu BB, et al. Neem extract (Azadirachta indica) as an to identification criteria differing among tions on microbes as reported in literature. antibacterial agent against fish laboratories. Even with rigorous testing, It also could be that more than one ingre- pathogenic bacteria. Indian J Exp Biol identification of some species is question- dients is required for their action against 1999;37(11):1097-1100. able. With minimal testing it is even less periodontal pathogens (they may have 12. Jones CG. Chlorhexidine: is it still the gold standard. Periodontology 2000, 1997; reliable (30).Another problem could be of synergistic effects altogether). Also sensi- 15:55-62. keeping periodontopathogenic bacteria vi- tivity tests measure antimicrobial activity 13. Jan SM, Sood M, Mehta DS. Effect of able, which is required for standard cultiva- against bacteria under laboratory conditions scaling and root planning on the tion. This may explain the inability to ob- (in vitro activity), not in the patient (in vivo composition of the human subgingival microbial flora. J Indian Soc Periodontol tain other known periopathogens in sub activity) (33). 1999;2(3):82-85. cultures (31). 14. Forbes BA, DF Sahm, Weissfeld AS, REFERENCES editors. Bailey and Scott’s diagnostic th The organisms were found to be sensitive 1. Wolinsky LE, Mania S, Nachnani S, et al. microbiology. 10 ed. St. Louis: Mosby Publication; 1998. to 0.2% chlorhexidine. This is in agreement The inhibiting effect of aqueous Azadirachta indica (Neem) extract upon 15. Cruikshank R, Duguid JP, Marmion BP, with various other studies where bacterial properties influencing in vitro Swain RHA, editors. Medical th chlorhexidine 0.2% had brought down the plaque formation. J Dent Res 1996;75(2): microbiology. 12 ed. ELBS and Churchill microbial counts (13,28,32). 816-22. Livingstone; 1974. 16. Collee JG, Fraser AG, Marmion BP,

8 JOHCD  www.johcd.org  January 2012;6(1) AN IN VITRO MICROBIOLOGICAL STUDY EVALUATING THE EFFICACY OF SOLUNEEM

Simmons AM, editors. Mackie and 22. Dzink JL ,Tanner ACR, Haffajee AD, human periodontal diseases. J McCartney. Practical Medical Socransky SS. Gram negative species Periodontol 1981;52(9):545-58. Microbiology. 14th ed. London: Churchill associated with active destructive 28. Drucker DB, Lilley JD, Tucker D, et al. Livingstone; 1996. periodontal lesions. J Clin Periodontol The endodontic microflora revisited. 17. Sutter VL, DM Citron, SM Finegold, editors. 1985;12(8):648-59. Microbios 1992;71(288-289):225-34. Wadsworth anaerobic bacteriology 23. Ali RW, Velcescu C, Jivanescu MC, et al. 29. Salari MH, Kadkhoda Z. Rate of cultivable manual. 3rd ed. St.Louis: CV Mosby Prevalence of six putative periodontal subgingival period-ontopathogenic Company; 1980. pathogens in subgingival plaque samples bacteria in chronic periodontitis. J Oral 18. Schmidlin OA, Zehnder M, Schmidlin PR. from Romanian adult periodontitis Sci 2004;46(3):157-61. Effectiveness of dentine bonding agents patients. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23(2): 30. Moore WEC. Microbiology of periodontal against cariogenic bacteria in vitro: a 133-39. disease. J Periodontal Res 1987;22: 335- comparison of two methods. Oral 24. Teanpaisan R, Douglas CWI, Walsh TE. 41. Microbiol Immunol 2003;18(3):140-43. Characterisation of black-pigmented 31. Jervoe Storm PM, Koltzscher M, Falk 19. Elias Haskel, Judith Esquenasi L. Effects anaerobes isolated from diseased and W, et al. Comparison of culture and real- of Subgingival Chlorhexidine Irrigation in healthy periodontal sites. J Periodontal time PCR for detection and Chronic Moderate Periodontitis. J Res 1995;30(4):245-51. quantification of five putative Periodontol 1986;57(5):305-10. 25. Byakod G, Kothiwale S, Deshpande RN. periodontopathogenic bacteria in 20. Newman MG, Takei HH, Klokkevold PR, A Study of plaque pH with microbial subgingival plaque samples. J Clin Carranza FA, editors: Sanz M, Newman variation with varying depth of gingival Periodontol 2005;32(7):778-83. MG Quirynen M. Advanced Diagnostic crevice in health and disease. J Indian 32. MacAlpine R, Magnusson I, Kiger R, et Techniques: Carranza’s Clinical Soc Periodontol 2004;7(2):105-08. al. Antimicrobial irrigation of deep pockets Periodontology. 10th ed. WB Saunders 26. Marc Quirynen, Wim Teughels, Marc De to supplement oral hygiene instruction Company; 2007. Soete, et al. Topical antiseptics and and root debridement. I Bi-weekly 21. Wennstrom JL, Heiji L, Dahlen G, et al. antibiotics in the initial therapy of chronic irrigation. J Clin Periodontol 1985;12(7): Periodic subgingival antimicrobial adult periodontitis: Microbiological 568-77. irrigation of periodontal pockets. I. Clinical aspects. Periodontology 2000 2002;28: 33. Cheesbrough Monica. District laboratory observations. J Clin Periodontol 72-90. testing in tropical countries. Cambridge 1987;14(9):541-50. 27. Genco RJ. Antibiotics in the treatment of University Press; 2005.

JOHCD  www.johcd.org  January 2012;6(1) 9