Check List 16 (4): 1025–1041
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Title a New Tree Frog of the Genus Kurixalus (Anura: Rhacophoridae)
A New Tree Frog of the Genus Kurixalus (Anura: Title Rhacophoridae) from Vietnam Author(s) Nguyen, Tao Thien; Matsui, Masafumi; Duc, Hoang Minh Citation Current Herpetology (2014), 33(2): 101-111 Issue Date 2014-08 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/216854 Right © 2014 by The Herpetological Society of Japan Type Journal Article Textversion publisher Kyoto University Current Herpetology 33(2): 101–111, August 2014 doi 10.5358/hsj.33.101 © 2014 by The Herpetological Society of Japan A New Tree Frog of the Genus Kurixalus (Anura: Rhacophoridae) from Vietnam TƵDŽ Tƾƿƻǃ NGUYEN1*, MƵLjƵƼNJǑƿ MATSUI2, Ƶǃƺ HDŽƵǃƽ Mƿǃƾ DUC3 1Vietnam National Museum of Nature, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet Road, Hanoi, VIETNAM 2Graduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606–8501, JAPAN 3Southern Institute of Ecology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 01 Mach Dinh Chi, Ben Nghe, Ho Chi Minh, VIETNAM Abstract: A small rhacophorid frog from southern Vietnam is placed in the genus Kurixalus through molecular phylogenetic analysis. Because it is divergent genetically and morphologically from all known congeners, we describe it as a distinct species, K. viridescens. The species di÷ers from the other congeners by an immaculate green dorsum, which is usually maculated gray to brown in the other species. With the addition of this new species, Vietnam now encompasses seven species of Kurixalus, and can be regarded as the center of speciation of this genus. Key words: Kurixalus viridescens sp. nov.; MtDNA phylogeny; New species; Taxonomy; Vietnam IǃljLJDŽƺNJƹljƿDŽǃ At present, about 10 species are assigned to the genus Kurixalus (Yu et al., 2013), but A rhacophorid frog genus Kurixalus Ye, there still remain several unnamed species Fei, and Dubois In Fei, 1999 occurs in Asia from little-explored regions. -
Breeding of Rhacophorus (Polypedates) Feae
The first breeding of Fea's Treefrog - Rhacophorus feae at the Leningrad Zoo with account of the species. by Anna A. Bagaturova, Mikhail F. Bagaturov (corresponding author, email: [email protected]), “Department of Insectarium and Amphibians”, Leningrad zoo, St. Petersburg, Russia Abstract. The success of first captive breeding of the giant species of rhacophorid arboreal frog Rhacophorus feae in amphibian facility in Leningrad Zoo (Saint-Petersburg, Russia) has been described. Their natural history data, conservation status, threads, natural predators, morphology including size discussion, prophylactic and medication treatment; issues of adopting of wild adult specimens, keeping and captive breeding in zoo’s amphibian facility were described; features of breeding behavior stimulation, foam nest construction, rising of tadpoles and young frogs of other rhacophorids in comparison with hylid treefrogs’ species were discussed. Keywords. Rhacophoridae: Polypedates, Rhacophorus maximus, R. dennysi, R. annamensis, R. orlovi, Kurixalus odontotarsus, R. feae: natural history, conservation status, threads, description, thread pose, Vietnam, Thailand; captive management, adaptation, breeding, nest, tadpoles, froglets, veterinary; feeding, proper housing, Hylidae, captive management, raising; Leningrad Zoo. Genus Rhacophorus H. Kuhl and J.C. van Hasselt, 1822 comprised for over 80 species (Frost, 2011, with later additions). Every year new species of rhacophorid frogs described from the territories of Vietnam, China, Cambodia and other countries of southeastern Asia for last decades (Inger et al, 1999 a, b.; Orlov et al, 2004, 2005 etc, see: References section for others). Some species of Rhacophorus also referred to as Polypedates, Aquixalus and Kurixalus according to different authors (Orlov and Ho, 2005, Fei et al, 2005, Yu et al, 2009, Frost, 2011, etc). -
Anuran Diversity Distribution Patterns in Lower Dibang Valley of Arunachal Pradesh, India
Herpetology Notes, volume 11: 781-789 (2018) (published online on 27 September 2018) Anuran diversity distribution patterns in Lower Dibang Valley of Arunachal Pradesh, India Jayanta K. Roy1,2*, Ramie H. Begum1, and M. Firoz Ahmed2 Abstract. The present study was conducted to estimate the anuran species diversity distribution patterns at Lower Dibang Valley with respect to secondary habitat conservation. Time-constrained Visual Encounter Surveys (VES) were conducted for amphibians followed with opportunistic observations during the study period. We compared the species diversity from three land use/land cover types that explained the available habitats and the importance of secondary forest in recolonizing anuran species during the course of study. Interestingly, anuran diversity measured from secondary/abandoned jhum and primary forest areas were found to be relatively equal (Shannon index; H: 2.77 and 2.76). The highest percentage of unique species was recorded from primary forest followed by secondary/abundant jhum and agriculture/settlement areas. However, secondary/abandoned jhum areas provided refuge for most anuran species normally inhabiting primary forest. We found beneficial human interaction along with secondary succession for creating habitat heterogeneity in secondary/abundant forest; and thus supports maximum anuran breeding habitats and species diversity in secondary/abundant jhum areas. Hence, secondary/abundant habitats were also important for anuran habitat conservation along with primary forest. We reported four new distribution records from Arunachal Pradesh: Nanorana chayuensis, Hydrophylax leptoglossa, Odorrana chloronota and Theloderma moloch. Keywords. Arunachal Pradesh, anuran diversity, habitat heterogeneity, land use/land cover, Lower Dibang Valley Introduction et al., 2005), followed by vegetation cover and local microclimate (Rios-Lopez and Aide, 2007). -
A Checklist of the Amphibians in Thailand
The Natural History Journal of Chulalongkorn University 1(1): 69-82, August 2001 ©2001 by Chulalongkorn University A Checklist of the Amphibians in Thailand WICHASE KHONSUE* AND KUMTHORN THIRAKHUPT Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, THAILAND ABSTRACT.−A checklist of amphibians in Thailand has been compiled based on literature surveys. Specific name and distribution were gathered from many recent publications. The number of amphibians increased substantially from previous reports. The amphibian fauna of Thailand comprises of 130 species, 8 families, and 3 orders. The literatures of amphibian studies in Thailand were also listed for future cited. KEY WORDS: Checklist; Distribution; Amphibian; Thailand; Southeast Asia several articles during 1915-1923 (Smith, 1915; INTRODUCTION 1916a, b, c; 1917a, b, c, d; 1922a, b, c; 1923). In 1917, he listed 52 amphibian species found Distribution pattern of amphibian fauna is to inhabit in Siam (=Thailand) (Smith, mainly affected by rainfall, pattern of 1917a,b,c,d). Later on, some of these species vegetation and geography. Biogeographically, were changed by other authors. During 1957- Thailand is located among 4 types of regions 1958 and 1959-1960, Edward H. Taylor, an including Northeastern montane region in American scientist under the Fullbright northern and western part, Thai-Lao dry scholarship, did thorough field surveys and plateau in northeastern part, Southeast Asian researches on herpetofauna of Thailand. He lowland in central and eastern part, and published “The amphibian fauna of Thailand” Tenasserim and Malay Peninsular in southern in 1962 listing 100 species of amphibian found part of Thailand (Inger, 1999). Peninsular in Thailand (Taylor, 1962). -
Red List of Bangladesh 2015
Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary Chief National Technical Expert Mohammad Ali Reza Khan Technical Coordinator Mohammad Shahad Mahabub Chowdhury IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature Bangladesh Country Office 2015 i The designation of geographical entitles in this book and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature concerning the legal status of any country, territory, administration, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The biodiversity database and views expressed in this publication are not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, Bangladesh Forest Department and The World Bank. This publication has been made possible because of the funding received from The World Bank through Bangladesh Forest Department to implement the subproject entitled ‘Updating Species Red List of Bangladesh’ under the ‘Strengthening Regional Cooperation for Wildlife Protection (SRCWP)’ Project. Published by: IUCN Bangladesh Country Office Copyright: © 2015 Bangladesh Forest Department and IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holders, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holders. Citation: Of this volume IUCN Bangladesh. 2015. Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. xvi+122. ISBN: 978-984-34-0733-7 Publication Assistant: Sheikh Asaduzzaman Design and Printed by: Progressive Printers Pvt. -
Download Download
BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X Volume 20, Number 9, September 2019 E-ISSN: 2085-4722 Pages: 2718-2732 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d200937 Species diversity and prey items of amphibians in Yoddom Wildlife Sanctuary, northeastern Thailand PRAPAIPORN THONGPROH1,♥, PRATEEP DUENGKAE2,♥♥, PRAMOTE RATREE3,♥♥♥, EKACHAI PHETCHARAT4,♥♥♥♥, WASSANA KINGWONGSA5,♥♥♥♥♥, WEEYAWAT JAITRONG6,♥♥♥♥♥♥, YODCHAIY CHUAYNKERN1,♥♥♥♥♥♥♥, CHANTIP CHUAYNKERN1,♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ 1Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Mueang Khon Kaen, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand. Tel.: +6643-202531, email: [email protected]; email: [email protected]; email: [email protected] 2Special Research Unit for Wildlife Genomics (SRUWG), Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand. email: [email protected] 3Protected Areas Regional Office 9 Ubon Ratchathani, Mueang Ubon Ratchathani, Ubon Ratchathani, 34000, Thailand. email: [email protected] 4Royal Initiative Project for Developing Security in the Area of Dong Na Tam Forest, Sri Mueang Mai, Ubon Ratchathani, 34250, Thailand. email: [email protected] 5Center of Study Natural and Wildlife, Nam Yuen, Ubon Ratchathani, 34260, Thailand. email: [email protected] 6Thailand Natural History Museum, National Science Museum, Technopolis, Khlong 5, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand, email: [email protected] Manuscript received: 25 July 2019. Revision accepted: 28 August 2019. Abstract. Thongproh P, Duengkae P, Ratree P, Phetcharat E, Kingwongsa W, Jaitrong W, Chuaynkern Y, Chuaynkern C. 2019. Species diversity and prey items of amphibians in Yoddom Wildlife Sanctuary, northeastern Thailand. Biodiversitas 20: 2718-2732. Amphibian occurrence within Yoddom Wildlife Sanctuary, which is located along the border region among Thailand, Cambodia, and Laos, is poorly understood. To determine amphibian diversity within the sanctuary, we conducted daytime and nocturnal surveys from 2014 to 2017 within six management units. -
Microhyla Berdmorei
21 THE STOMACH CONTENTS OF SOME ANURAN TADPOLES FROM THAILAND Benjawan Moonasa1, Prapaiporn Thongproh1, Ekachai Phetcharat2, Wassana Kingwongsa3, Pramote Ratree4, Prateep Duengkae5, Theerasak Somdee6, Yodchaiy Chuaynkern1 & Chantip Chuaynkern1,* ABSTRACT The stomach contents of 18 tadpole species in Thailand were studied. The tadpoles in this study consisted of one species of the family Bufonidae (Duttaphrynus melanostictus); one species of Dicroglossidae (Fejervarya limnocharis); four species of Megophryidae (Megophrys carinense, Megophrys sp., Leptobrachium smithi and Leptolalax sp.); six species of Microhylidae (Microhyla butleri, Microhyla berdmorei, Microhyla heymonsi, Micryletta inornata, Kaloula pulchra and Glyphoglossus molossus); three species of Ranidae (Clinotarsus penelope, Hylarana erythraea and Sylvirana nigrovittata); and three species of Rhacophoridae (Polypedates leucomystax, Rhacophorus rhodopus and Rhacophorus jarujini). Tadpole specimens were collected by net from the following five areas: Phu Khiao Wildlife Sanctuary in Chaiyaphum Province, Yoddom Wildlife Sanctuary in Ubon Ratchathani Province, Phu Kradueng National Park in Loei Province, Umphang Wildlife Sanctuary in Tak Province, and Nam Nao National Park in Phetchabun Province. Specimens were dissected in order to remove their stomachs. All stomach contents were kept in order to create semi-permanent slides, which were observed under the light microscope. The results of tadpole stomach contents showed eight groups of food items, which included microalgae (25 genera), protozoa (3 genera), fungi like-organisms, rotifers (3 genera, including amictic eggs and bdelloid rotifers), diatoms (16 genera), arthropods, nematodes, and plant parts. Keywords: Amphibian, diet, food items, stomach analysis, Thailand INTRODUCTION Food is an important welfare factor for all living organisms. In amphibians, caecilians generally feed on earthworms and other invertebrates, while anurans and salamanders feed almost exclusively on insects (Vitt & Caldwell, 2009). -
1704632114.Full.Pdf
Phylogenomics reveals rapid, simultaneous PNAS PLUS diversification of three major clades of Gondwanan frogs at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary Yan-Jie Fenga, David C. Blackburnb, Dan Lianga, David M. Hillisc, David B. Waked,1, David C. Cannatellac,1, and Peng Zhanga,1 aState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, College of Ecology and Evolution, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China; bDepartment of Natural History, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611; cDepartment of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Collections, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712; and dMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Contributed by David B. Wake, June 2, 2017 (sent for review March 22, 2017; reviewed by S. Blair Hedges and Jonathan B. Losos) Frogs (Anura) are one of the most diverse groups of vertebrates The poor resolution for many nodes in anuran phylogeny is and comprise nearly 90% of living amphibian species. Their world- likely a result of the small number of molecular markers tra- wide distribution and diverse biology make them well-suited for ditionally used for these analyses. Previous large-scale studies assessing fundamental questions in evolution, ecology, and conser- used 6 genes (∼4,700 nt) (4), 5 genes (∼3,800 nt) (5), 12 genes vation. However, despite their scientific importance, the evolutionary (6) with ∼12,000 nt of GenBank data (but with ∼80% missing history and tempo of frog diversification remain poorly understood. data), and whole mitochondrial genomes (∼11,000 nt) (7). In By using a molecular dataset of unprecedented size, including 88-kb the larger datasets (e.g., ref. -
Phạm Thế Cƣờng NGHIÊN CỨU MỨC ĐỘ ĐA DẠNG VÀ ĐẶC ĐIỂM
BỘ GIÁO DỤC VÀ ĐÀO TẠO VIỆN HÀN LÂM KHOA HỌC VÀ CÔNG NGHỆ VIỆT NAM HỌC VIỆN KHOA HỌC VÀ CÔNG NGHỆ Phạm Thế Cƣờng NGHIÊN CỨU MỨC ĐỘ ĐA DẠNG VÀ ĐẶC ĐIỂM PHÂN BỐ CỦA CÁC LOÀI ẾCH NHÁI (AMPHIBIA) Ở MỘT SỐ KHU VỰC NÚI ĐÁ VÔI THUỘC MIỀN BẮC VIỆT NAM VÀ ĐỀ XUẤT CÁC GIẢI PHÁP BẢO TỒN Chuyên ngành: ĐỘNG VẬT HỌC Mã số: 62.42.01.03 TÓM TẮT LUẬN ÁN TIẾN SĨ SINH HỌC HÀ NỘI–2018 Công trình được hoàn thành tại: Học viện Khoa học và Công nghệ Người hướng dẫn khoa học: 1. TS. Nguyễn Quảng Trường 2. TS. Lê Đức Minh Phản biện 1: PGS. TS. Lê Nguyên Ngật Phản biện 2: PGS. TS. Hoàng Ngọc Thảo Phản biện 3: TS. Hoàng Văn Ngọc Luận án sẽ được bảo vệ trước Hội đồng chấm luận án cấp Học viện họp tại Học viện Khoa học và Công nghệ - Viện Hàn lâm Khoa học và Công nghệ Việt Nam vào hồi …..giờ … ngày … tháng… năm 2018 Có thể tìm hiểu luận án tại thư viện: - Thư viện Quốc Gia, Hà Nội - Thư viện Học viện Khoa học và Công nghệ MỞ ĐẦU 1. Tính cấp thiết của đề tài Việt Nam là một trong những nước có tiềm năng đa dạng sinh học cao trên thế giới (Conservation International 2016). Riêng về lớp Ếch nhái (Amphibia), số lượng loài ghi nhận ở Việt Nam tăng lên nhanh chóng trong các thập kỷ gần đây: từ 82 loài vào năm 1996 lên 176 loài vào năm 2009 (Nguyen et al. -
Cytogenetic Study of Three Microhylid Species (Anura, Microhylidae) from Thailand
© 2017 The Japan Mendel Society Cytologia 82(1) Special Issue: 67–74 Cytogenetic Study of Three Microhylid Species (Anura, Microhylidae) from Thailand Wiwat Sangpakdee1, Sumalee Phimphan2, Bundit Tengjaroenkul3,7, Krit Pinthong4, Lamyai Neeratanaphan5,7 and Alongklod Tanomtong6,7* 1 Program in Biology, Faculty of Science, Udon Thani Rajabhat University, Udon Thani 40001, Thailand 2 Program in Public Health, Faculty of Science and Technology, Surindra Rajabhat University, Surin 32000, Thailand 3 Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand 4 Program in Biology, Department of Fundamental Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Surindra Rajabhat University, Surin 32000, Thailand 5 Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand 6 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand 7 Research Group on Toxic Substances in Livestock and Aquatic Animals, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand Received December 6, 2015; accepted April 29, 2016 Summary The cytogenetics of the ornamented pygmy frog (Microhyla fissipes), painted chorus frog (M. pul- chra) and narrow-mouthed frog (M. heymonsi) were studied in the aspect of chromosome numbers, morphology and nucleolus organizer region (NOR) locations. For this present study, we provided the karyotype and idiogram of these three species by conventional and Ag-NOR staining techniques. The 10 male and female samples of those three species were collected in Northeast Thailand. The metaphase chromosome preparations were pre- pared from the bone marrows by the standard protocol. To stain the chromosomes, 10% Giemsa’s and 50% sil- ver nitrate were applied. The results showed that all three species had the same diploid chromosome number of 2n=24, and fundamental numbers (NF) were 48 in both males and females. -
Genetic Divergences of South and Southeast Asian Frogs: a Case Study of Several Taxa Based on 16S Ribosomal RNA Gene Data with Notes on the Generic Name Fejervarya
Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2014) 38: 389-411 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1308-36 Genetic divergences of South and Southeast Asian frogs: a case study of several taxa based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene data with notes on the generic name Fejervarya 1 1 2 1 Mahmudul HASAN , Mohammed Mafizul ISLAM , Md. Mukhlesur Rahman KHAN , Takeshi IGAWA , 3 4 5 6 7 Mohammad Shafiqul ALAM , Hon Tjong DJONG , Nia KURNIAWAN , Hareesh JOSHY , Yong Hoi SEN , 7 1 8 1, Daicus M. BELABUT , Atsushi KURABAYASHI , Mitsuru KURAMOTO , Masayuki SUMIDA * 1 Institute for Amphibian Biology, Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, Higashihiroshima, Japan 2 Department of Fisheries Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Fisheries, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh 3 Department of Genetics and Fish Breeding, Faculty of Fisheries, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur 1706, Bangladesh 4 Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Science, Andalas University, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia 5 Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Science, Brawijawa University, Malang, East Java, Indonesia 6 Laboratory of Applied Biology, St. Aloysius College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India 7 Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 8 3-6-15 Hikarigaoka, Munakata, Fukuoka, Japan Received: 23.08.2013 Accepted: 01.01.2014 Published Online: 20.05.2014 Printed: 19.06.2014 Abstract: To elucidate the genetic divergences of several Asian frog taxa, the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene (16S) sequences of 81 populations across 6 Asian countries were analyzed. In total, 109 haplotypes were found, and the concept of a 3% difference in 16S sequence corresponding to species threshold was applied to define candidate amphibian species, for which corroborating evidence, such as morphology, ecological characteristics, and/or nuclear gene data, is required. -
A Biogeographic Synthesis of the Amphibians and Reptiles of Indochina
BAIN & HURLEY: AMPHIBIANS OF INDOCHINA & REPTILES & HURLEY: BAIN Scientific Publications of the American Museum of Natural History American Museum Novitates A BIOGEOGRAPHIC SYNTHESIS OF THE Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES OF INDOCHINA Publications Committee Robert S. Voss, Chair Board of Editors Jin Meng, Paleontology Lorenzo Prendini, Invertebrate Zoology RAOUL H. BAIN AND MARTHA M. HURLEY Robert S. Voss, Vertebrate Zoology Peter M. Whiteley, Anthropology Managing Editor Mary Knight Submission procedures can be found at http://research.amnh.org/scipubs All issues of Novitates and Bulletin are available on the web from http://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace Order printed copies from http://www.amnhshop.com or via standard mail from: American Museum of Natural History—Scientific Publications Central Park West at 79th Street New York, NY 10024 This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (permanence of paper). AMNH 360 BULLETIN 2011 On the cover: Leptolalax sungi from Van Ban District, in northwestern Vietnam. Photo by Raoul H. Bain. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY A BIOGEOGRAPHIC SYNTHESIS OF THE AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES OF INDOCHINA RAOUL H. BAIN Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Herpetology) and Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, American Museum of Natural History Life Sciences Section Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, ON Canada MARTHA M. HURLEY Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, American Museum of Natural History Global Wildlife Conservation, Austin, TX BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Number 360, 138 pp., 9 figures, 13 tables Issued November 23, 2011 Copyright E American Museum of Natural History 2011 ISSN 0003-0090 CONTENTS Abstract.........................................................