The How and Why of Pricing Carbon

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The How and Why of Pricing Carbon CHAPTER IN A CHART Current U.S. Policy is Piecemeal and Often Expensive Low Carbon Fuel Standards $2971 Solar Photovoltaics Subsidies $2151 Cash for Clunkers Weatherization Assistance Program CAFE Standards Wind Energy Subsidies Renewable Portfolio Standards Renewable Fuel Subsidies Livestock Management Policies Reduced Federal Coal Leasing Agricultural Emissions Policies Methane Flaring Reduction ECONOMY-WIDE APPROACHES Clean Power Plan Reforestation Put a Price on It: The How Behavioral Energy E!ciency Direct Air Capture and Why of Pricing Carbon -200 0 200 400 600 Abatement Cost ($ per ton of CO2, 2018 USD) Michael Greenstone, Milton Friedman Distinguished Service Professor in Economics; Low High Director, EPIC; Director, Becker Friedman Institute Ishan Nath, Postdoctoral Scholar, EPIC Source: Authors' analysis with data from Gillingham and Stock (2018). Carbon pricing policies are widely recommended by Heart of the Problem Cheap, reliable fossil fuels play a primary role in powering the U.S. economists and other experts as the most cost-e!ective approach to reducing emissions. These policies allow Energy is essential to the modern world, heating homes, economy and appear on track to continue dominating the global for the greatest environmental bene"t at a given price lighting o#ces, powering factories, and fueling cars. No energy system for decades to come. Though fossil fuel energy appears by giving "rms and consumers the option to choose the country in the world has gotten rich without consuming cheapest ways to reduce emissions, as well as to engage large quantities of energy per capita. Today, that energy inexpensive to consumers, it creates severe harms to society that are in emitting activities that bene"t them more than the comes predominantly from coal, oil, and natural gas; not re$ected in its price, from air pollution that damages health and cost to society. While many countries around the world these sources provide approximately 85 percent of global and several jurisdictions within the United States have primary energy consumption and 81 percent in the shortens lifespans to carbon emissions that cause climate change priced carbon through either a carbon tax or an emissions United States.1 Fossil fuels dominate the energy landscape that will become increasingly dangerous as the earth warms. As the trading system, existing federal U.S. climate policy instead because they are reliable and cheap, a condition that consists of a piecemeal arrangement of regulations and is unlikely to change for the foreseeable future. This world grows richer and energy demand increases, avoiding serious mandates for speci"c actions and technologies. This creates a challenge for policymakers facing competing climate change damages will require emissions reductions on a approach has not been e!ective overall, with many priorities: how to mitigate the harms caused by burning existing policies achieving little environmental bene"t fossil fuels, including climate change and air pollution, massive scale. This underscores the critical importance of policy that at a relatively high cost. Putting a price on carbon is an while continuing to reap the bene"ts of the energy the makes ambitious mitigation goals attainable at a manageable cost. alternative approach that ensures that society undertakes fuels have long provided. For the Biden administration, only the most cost-e!ective forms of carbon abatement the challenge is even more speci"c: how to use American and thereby minimizes the cost associated with urgently policy to address a global challenge without putting an needed ambitious climate mitigation. undue burden on the U.S. economy. 1 BP plc, BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2019. 50 U.S. ENERGY & CLIMATE ROADMAP EPIC.UCHICAGO.EDU U.S. ENERGY & CLIMATE ROADMAP 51 FIGURE 1 Global Fossil Fuel Reserves-to-Production Ratios Though continued technological improvements are never guaranteed, the best estimates suggest that, at least 250 Years on the time scales that matter for restraining climate change, there are functionally unlimited global supplies of fossil fuels. Various experts place the range of possible 200 resources at 3-4 times current proven reserves for oil, 7-60 times for natural gas, and 14-23 times for coal.8 If future 150 Coal technology allows people to tap into these reservoirs, Natural Gas global markets could have access to hundreds or even Oil thousands of years of carbon-based energy. 100 Despite improvements in fuel e!ciency over recent decades, Energy use is plateauing in the United States and the rest transportation remains a major source of emissions in the United States. 50 of the wealthy world but global usage is growing rapidly, fueling historic improvements in human development. Between 2005 and 2019, global consumption of oil, The Health and Climate 0 coal, and natural gas rose by 16 percent, 20 percent, and 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2017 Consequences of Fossil Fuels 41 percent respectively, with increases concentrated Burning fossil fuels causes both local and global Source: EPIC analysis based on data from BP. in developing countries.9 The world’s poor and middle environmental damage with serious consequences for class have growing access to a wide variety of comforts human welfare. Particulate matter air pollution, primarily and necessities—refrigerators, televisions, and cars— dominant technology with a substantial cost advantage. driven by local fossil fuel combustion, has been linked Fossil Fuels Are Not On Track to Go Away and the share of the world’s population living below At current battery prices, the price of oil would have to a wide range of social harms, including low infant In the electricity sector, coal and natural gas provide the World Bank’s de"nition of extreme poverty ($1.90 to rise to $180 per barrel to make an EV with 250 miles birthweight, high infant mortality, chronic heart and lung both baseload capacity, which produces a constant, per day) has fallen from 37 percent in 1990 to under 10 of driving range cost-competitive with traditional ICE- conditions, reduced worker productivity, and diminished steady stream of power, and dispatchable generation, percent in 2015.10 engine vehicles. Unless battery prices fall signi"cantly or academic performance by school-age children.13 One which ramps up and down to meet $uctuating consumer oil prices rise dramatically, gasoline and oil are in position Despite these gains, recent estimates suggest that 3.5 study showed that early childhood exposure to air demand. Both these sources do so at low prices. to continue fueling the U.S. transportation sector for the billion people still lack access to reliable electricity and pollution reduces wages and labor force participation Electricity costs about 3 cents per kilowatt hour (kWh) foreseeable future.5 nearly 800 million have no access at all.11 As of 2018, the even at age thirty.14 While the United States has made when produced by existing coal plants and just under average person in India consumed less than a tenth of the considerable progress on reducing air pollution through 5 cents per kWh from new natural gas plants, making Meanwhile, the supply of fossil fuels is virtually electricity of the average American; the average person in the enforcement of the Clean Air Act and subsequent them the cheapest among currently available “baseload” limitless. Figure 1 shows that global proven reserves of China just over a third.12 The extraordinary global progress legislation, in 2018 11 percent of the U.S. population still options.2 While the costs of renewable sources have oil, coal, and natural gas—de"ned as known deposits of the last twenty years deserves celebration. Yet, there is faced exposure to annual pollution levels above the World declined rapidly in recent years, their total cost to the that are technically and economically recoverable at little doubt that billions of people around the world will Health Organization’s guideline of 10 micrograms per grid remains higher than fossil fuels because they current market prices—account for many decades of demand continued energy consumption growth in the cubic meter. Globally, the consequences have been even depend on backup generation or storage capacity (for production. More importantly, despite rising U.S. and next several decades. Under current policy and market more severe: particulate matter pollution reduced average more, see "Fueling Technology Deployment with a Clean global consumption, technological advances have actually trends, fossil fuels appear poised to be the primary source life expectancy around the world in 2018 by about 1.9 Electricity Standard", page 88). It is no surprise then that increased reserves over the last twenty years. In the for meeting this growing demand. years per person.15 together coal and natural gas account for 62 percent of United States, for example, oil and gas reserves expanded U.S. electricity generation.3 by 100 percent and 171 percent respectively between 2000 and 2018 due to new hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) 8 McGlade and Ekins, “The geographical distribution of fossil 13 Chay and Greenstone, “The impact of air pollution on infant The current outlook in the transportation sector is similar. techniques.6 Exploratory wells now strike oil more than fuels.” McGlade and Ekins summary from the Federal Institute for mortality”; Currie and Neidell. “Air pollution and infant health”; While electric vehicle (EV) sales have grown in recent Geosciences and Natural Resources, the International Energy Agency, Currie and Walker. “Tra#c congestion and infant health”; Currie et 50 percent of the time—a sharp rise from rates below 30 years, they still account for under 2 percent of all new and the Global Energy Assessment as described in Covert, Greenstone, al., “Environmental health risks and housing values”; Chang et al., th 7 and Knittel, “Will we ever stop using fossil fuels?” “Particulate pollution and the productivity of pear packers”; Gra! Zivin 4 percent for most of the 20 century.
Recommended publications
  • Collectivism Predicts Mask Use During COVID-19
    Collectivism predicts mask use during COVID-19 Jackson G. Lua,1, Peter Jina, and Alexander S. Englishb,c,1 aSloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142; bDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang 310027, China; and cShanghai International Studies University, Shanghai 200083, China Edited by Hazel Rose Markus, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved March 23, 2021 (received for review November 3, 2020) Since its outbreak, COVID-19 has impacted world regions differen- whereas individualism captures “thetendencytobemoreconcerned tially. Whereas some regions still record tens of thousands of new with one’s own needs, goals, and interests than with group-oriented infections daily, other regions have contained the virus. What ex- concerns” (7). People in collectivistic cultures are more likely to plains these striking regional differences? We advance a cultural agree with statements like “I usually sacrifice my self-interest for the psychological perspective on mask usage, a precautionary mea- benefitofmygroup” and “My happiness depends very much on the sure vital for curbing the pandemic. Four large-scale studies pro- happiness of those around me,” whereas people in individualistic vide evidence that collectivism (versus individualism) positively cultures are more likely to agree with statements like “Ioftendomy predicts mask usage—both within the United States and across own thing” and “What happens to me is my own doing” (6, 8–11). the world. Analyzing a dataset of all 3,141 counties of the 50 US As evidenced by widely used collectivism–individualism indices states (based on 248,941 individuals), Study 1a revealed that mask (12–15), collectivism–individualism varies both across countries and usage was higher in more collectivistic US states.
    [Show full text]
  • CO₂ and Other Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Our World in Data
    7/20/2019 CO₂ and other Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Our World in Data CO₂ and other Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Hannah Ritchie and Max Roser This article was first published in May 2017; however, its contents are frequently updated with the latest data and research. Introduction Carbon dioxide (CO2) is known as a greenhouse gas (GHG)—a gas that absorbs and emits thermal radiation, creating the 'greenhouse effect'. Along with other greenhouse gases, such as nitrous oxide and methane, CO2 is important in sustaining a habitable temperature for the planet: if there were absolutely no GHGs, our planet would simply be too cold. It has been estimated that without these gases, the average surface temperature of the Earth would be about -18 degrees celsius.1 Since the Industrial Revolution, however, energy-driven consumption of fossil fuels has led to a rapid increase in CO2 emissions, disrupting the global carbon cycle and leading to a planetary warming impact. Global warming and a changing climate have a range of potential ecological, physical and health impacts, including extreme weather events (such as floods, droughts, storms, and heatwaves); sea-level rise; altered crop growth; and disrupted water systems. The most extensive source of analysis on the potential impacts of climatic change can be found in the 5th Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report; this presents full coverage of all impacts in its chapter on Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability.2 In light of this evidence, UN member parties have set a target of limiting average warming to 2 degrees celsius above pre- industrial temperatures.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial the Covid-19 Crisis
    european journal of comparative law and governance 7 (2020) 109-115 brill.com/ejcl Editorial ∵ The covid-19 Crisis: A Challenge for Numeric Comparative Law and Governance In the past weeks, scholars from different disciplines – including myself – have been comparing the publicly available data from different countries about the coronavirus pandemic (covid-19) on a daily basis. For a researcher in com- parative law-and-governance, these data are very tempting. Would they allow to draw at least some very raw conclusions about the goodness or badness of some countries’ governance concerning the prevention of covid-19 deaths?1 The more I progressed in this research, the more conscious I became of the dangers lurking in a numeric comparative law2 approach to the covid-19 pan- demic. At least three mistakes should be avoided: The first mistake is to focus on the case fatality rate, i.e. the number of covid-19 deaths compared to the number of persons tested positive to the vi- rus in a certain country. For example, one may be tempted to assume that in Germany the governance of the pandemic has been much better than in Bel- gium, Denmark, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, and Sweden, just be- cause in Germany the case fatality rate has been (and still is) lower than in the 1 M. Roser, H. Ritchie, E. Ortiz-Ospina, and J. Hasell, seem to believe in the possibility of such a comparison. See the Statistics and Research Coronavirus Pandemic (covid-19) website of the Oxford Martin School’s Our World in Data project, ‘Compare Countries’ and ‘Coronavirus Country Profiles’: “Which countries are doing better and which are doing worse?” We built 207 country profiles which allow you to explore the statistics on the coronavirus pan- demic for every country in the world”.
    [Show full text]
  • The COVID-19 Pandemic: a Multidimensional Crisis
    Gac Méd Caracas 2020;128(Supl 2):S137-S148 ARTÍCULO ORIGINAL DOI: 10.47307/GMC.2020.128.s2.2 The COVID-19 pandemic: A multidimensional crisis Dr. Friedrich Welsch1 SUMMARY The pandemic may be a catalyst for a new normalcy The COVID-19 pandemic hit nations in all continents with teleworking heading toward a working-from- hard with the Americas standing out as the world´s home-economy. hardest-hit region. Government responses have been varying in timeliness, stringency, and results with Key words: Pandemic, COVID-19, health system outcomes being independent of regime type or political preparedness, Government Response Stringency Index, system but influenced by early action and the severity containment strategies, government performance, of containment strategies. economic/financial impact, Venezuela, working-from- The economic and financial impact of the pandemic home, new normalcy. has been estimated at a US$ 8,8 trillion decrease of the global GDP, more than the economies of Japan and Germany combined, and threatening RESUMEN the destruction of nearly half the global workforce La pandemia del COVID-19 ha afectado duramente livelihoods. Governments worldwide have announced a las naciones de todos los continentes, destacando unprecedented rescue packages to the tune of around América como la región más afectada del mundo. Las US$ 10 trillion 40 percent of the global GDP. respuestas de los gobiernos han variado en cuanto a The pandemic hit Venezuela during a generalized oportunidad, rigor y resultados. Los impactos han sido humanitarian crisis and the health system in tatters. independientes del tipo de régimen o sistema político, The real dimension of the pandemic is a mystery due pero han estado influidos por las medidas tempranas to the opaqueness of the virus-related data published y la severidad de las estrategias de contención.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fast Approval and Slow Rollout of Sputnik V: Why Is Russia's Vaccine
    Article The Fast Approval and Slow Rollout of Sputnik V: Why Is Russia’s Vaccine Rollout Slower than That of Other Nations? Elza Mikule 1,*,† , Tuuli Reissaar 1,† , Jennifer Villers 1,† , Alain Simplice Takoupo Penka 1,† , Alexander Temerev 2 and Liudmila Rozanova 2 1 Global Studies Institute, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland; [email protected] (T.R.); [email protected] (J.V.); [email protected] (A.S.T.P.) 2 Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland; [email protected] (A.T.); [email protected] (L.R.) * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally. Abstract: The emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in the beginning of 2020 led to the deployment of enormous amounts of resources by different countries for vaccine development, and the Russian Federation was the first country in the world to approve a COVID-19 vaccine on 11 August 2020. In our research we sought to crystallize why the rollout of Sputnik V has been relatively slow considering that it was the first COVID-19 vaccine approved in the world. We looked at production capacity, at the number of vaccine doses domestically administered and internationally exported, and at vaccine hesitancy levels. By 6 May 2021, more first doses of Sputnik V had been administered Citation: Mikule, E.; Reissaar, T.; abroad than domestically, suggesting that limited production capacity was unlikely to be the main Villers, J.; Takoupo Penka, A.S.; reason behind the slow rollout. What remains unclear, however, is why Russia prioritized vaccine Temerev, A.; Rozanova, L.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Extreme Poverty I.2 Extreme Poverty in the Broader Context of Well-Being II
    Our World in Data Search... Blog About Donate Population Health Food Energy Environment Technology Growth & Inequality Work & Life Public Sector Global Connections War & Peace Politics Violence & Rights Education Media Culture Contents I. Introduction I.1 Overview of this entry Global Extreme Poverty I.2 Extreme poverty in the broader context of well-being II. Extreme poverty in a historical perspective [cite] by Esteban Ortiz-Ospina and Max Roser II.1 Historical poverty around the world II.2 Historical poverty in today’s rich countries III. Extreme poverty around the world today I. Introduction III.1 The evolution of extreme poverty, country by country III.2 The evolution of poverty by world regions III.3 The demographics of extreme poverty I.1 Overview of this entry III.4 The future of extreme poverty III.5 Poverty across multiple dimensions This entry is concerned with extreme poverty. The World Bank is the main source for global information on extreme IV. Correlates, determinants and consequences poverty today and sets the International Poverty Line. This poverty line was revised in 2015 – since then a person is IV.1 Poverty traps considered to be in extreme poverty if he or she is living on less than 1.90 international dollars (int.-$) per day. The IV.2 Evidence on specific strategies to reduce poverty poverty measurement is based on the monetary value of a person’s consumption, but since consumption measures are IV.3 Cross-country correlates unfortunately not available for all countries, the World Bank has to rely on income measures for some countries. V.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2109.00050V1 [Stat.AP] 31 Aug 2021 2 Methodology
    USE OF ALTERNATIVE DATA:HIGH FREQUENCY READOUT OF THE SITUATION - COVID POLICIES, MOBILITY AND R-NUMBER Ashutosh Mani Dixit Suraj Regmi Economist Data Scientist [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT The role of alternative data in the crisis was recognized even before the COVID-19 pandemic[1]. Now, the months of stalemate made it more urgent to understand the importance of high-frequency data to inform the policy responses [2]. In Nepal, the Government has exerted stay put measures, and physical data collection activities are suspended. The confirmed cases of COVID-19 has reached more than 560,000[3] and the country is on high alert . In this impasse, the number of secondary cases one would produce over the course of outbreak - the reproduction number (R0) is useful to monitor the transmissibility of COVID-19 [4]. As the R-value is rapidly changing, it can be affected by a range of factors, including not just how infectious a disease is but how Government responds to it, and how the population behaves1. The World Health Organization (WHO) has suggested to the Government of Nepal several recommendations to contain the further spread of COVID-19. To get a sense of how Nepal is coping with the coronavirus pandemic we look at the alternative data sets to get a better understanding of the pandemic policies, mobility, and R-value during COVID. Keywords Alternative data · COVID-19 · R-Number 1 Objective (a) To get the high frequency read out of the COVID situation in Nepal We calculate effective reproduction number (R-value) from OWID data (smoothed)[5], and gain additional insights from COVID-19 community mobility reports2, the Oxford Coronavirus Government response tracker - Oxford stringency index3 and Google search trends.[7] (b) Make available the source code for extracting alternative data The data, and source code, along with frequently updated dashboard monitoring the R-value will be made open and available for public use.
    [Show full text]
  • Transatlantic Excess Mortality Comparisons in the Pandemic
    Transatlantic excess mortality comparisons in the pandemic Janine Aron and John Muellbauer1 25 August 2020 Abstract: In a previous article, we considered key issues for comparing rates of excess mortality between countries and regions, with an application to European countries. This article compares the U.S. with Europe, and U.S. regions with the main European countries. The U.S. policy-makers had multiple advantages over European countries, such as Italy and Spain, in responding to the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic: more time to react, with excess deaths lagging three weeks behind, and a younger, less densely-populated, less urban population. With the further passage of time, medical knowledge about Covid-19 has improved, health and testing capacities have been built up and practical experience has allowed both the private precautionary responses of citizens and of public policies to develop. This should have given countries and regions, for example, the U.S. South, the West and the Midwest, together accounting for 83 percent of the U.S. population, and where the spread of virus occurred later, a further advantage over those caught up in the first pandemic wave. Despite this, a comparison for the whole of the U.S. with Europe, excluding Russia, shows that the cumulative rate of excess mortality in 2020 was higher in the U.S.. And for the U.S. Northeast, the most comparable U.S. region, being closest to major European countries in the timing of the pandemic, and in population-density, age and urbanisation, the plausible measures of excess mortality prove substantially worse than for the worst-affected countries in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Package 'Corona'
    Package ‘corona’ September 23, 2020 Title Coronavirus ('Rona') Data Exploration Version 0.3.0 Depends R (>= 3.5.0), plyr Imports gganimate, ggplot2, gridExtra, qicharts2, reshape2 Maintainer Jo van Schalkwyk <[email protected]> Description Manipulate and view coronavirus data and other societally relevant data at a basic level. License GPL-3 Encoding UTF-8 LazyData true RoxygenNote 7.1.0 NeedsCompilation no Author Jo van Schalkwyk [aut, cre] (<https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0082-5243>) Repository CRAN Date/Publication 2020-09-23 09:30:03 UTC R topics documented: allo .............................................2 citymap . .3 cntry . .4 corona . .5 corona_all . .5 corona_citymap . .6 corona_converge . .6 corona_country . .7 corona_dowjones . .8 corona_life . .8 corona_lockdown . .9 corona_metabolism . 10 corona_monty . 11 corona_rabbits . 11 1 2 allo corona_totals . 12 corona_trends . 12 corona_vienna . 13 country_dead . 13 djia ............................................. 14 gt .............................................. 15 life.............................................. 15 lock ............................................. 16 owid............................................. 16 stmf............................................. 17 vienna . 18 Index 19 allo Allometric scaling data. Description Used to introduce power laws. Usage allo Format A data frame with 455 rows. Species Mass Temperature MR Metabolic rate AvgMass Q10SMR Reference Source https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/suppl/10.1098/rsbl.2005.0378 citymap 3 citymap
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-TRACK: World and USA SARS-COV-2 Testing and COVID-19 Tracking Ye Emma Zohner1* and Jeffrey S
    Zohner and Morris BioData Mining (2021) 14:4 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-021-00233-2 SOFTWARE ARTICLE Open Access COVID-TRACK: world and USA SARS-COV-2 testing and COVID-19 tracking Ye Emma Zohner1* and Jeffrey S. Morris2 * Correspondence: emma.zohner@ rice.edu Abstract 1Department of Statistics, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused major health and socio-economic Houston, TX 77005, USA disruptions worldwide. Accurate investigation of emerging data is crucial to inform Full list of author information is policy makers as they construct viral mitigation strategies. Complications such as available at the end of the article variable testing rates and time lags in counting cases, hospitalizations and deaths make it challenging to accurately track and identify true infectious surges from available data, and requires a multi-modal approach that simultaneously considers testing, incidence, hospitalizations, and deaths. Although many websites and applications report a subset of these data, none of them provide graphical displays capable of comparing different states or countries on all these measures as well as various useful quantities derived from them. Here we introduce a freely available dynamic representation tool, COVID-TRACK, that allows the user to simultaneously assess time trends in these measures and compare various states or countries, equipping them with a tool to investigate the potential effects of the different mitigation strategies and timelines used by various jurisdictions. Findings: COVID-TRACK is a Python based web-application that provides a platform for tracking testing, incidence, hospitalizations, and deaths related to COVID-19 along with various derived quantities.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) – Statistics and Research by Max Roser, Hannah Ritchie and Esteban Ortiz-Ospina Cite This Research
    Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) – Statistics and Research by Max Roser, Hannah Ritchie and Esteban Ortiz-Ospina Cite this research Note: To inform yourself and understand the risk to the public we recommend to rely on your government body responsible for health and the World Health Organization – their site is here. The mission of Our World in Data is to make data and research on the world’s largest problems understandable and accessible. Read more about our mission → While most of our work focuses on large problems that humanity has faced for a long time – such as child mortality, natural disasters, poverty and almost 100 other problems (see here) – this article focuses on a new, emerging global problem: the ongoing outbreak of the coronavirus disease [COVID-19]. The outbreak started in late 2019 and developed into a global pandemic by March 2020. This article covers a developing situation and the Our World in Data team is regularly updating it: The last update was made on March 14, 2020 (21:00 London time). About this page Limitations of current research and limitations of our presentation of current research The purpose of this article on COVID-19 is to aggregate existing research, bring together the relevant data and allow readers to make sense of the published data and early research on the coronavirus outbreak. Most of our work focuses on established problems, for which we can refer to well-established research and data. COVID-19 is different. All data and research on the virus is preliminary; researchers are rapidly learning more about a new and evolving problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Differences in COVID-19-Related Mortality T I G O
    DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232020256.1.11112020 2403 AR Worldwide differences in COVID-19-related mortality T I G O Diferenças nas taxas de mortalidade por COVID-19 AR T ao redor do mundo IC LE Pedro Curi Hallal (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1470-6461) 1 Abstract Mortality statistics due to COVID-19 Resumo Neste artigo, são comparadas as esta- worldwide are compared, by adjusting for the tísticas de mortalidade por COVID-19 no mun- size of the population and the stage of the pan- do, ajustando-se para o tamanho da população e demic. Data from the European Centre for Dise- para o estágio da pandemia em cada país. Foram ase Control and Prevention, and Our World in utilizados dados dos websites do Centro para o Data websites were used. Analyses are based on Controle e Prevenção de Doenças da Europa e do number of deaths per one million inhabitants. In Our World in Data. As análises são baseadas no order to account for the stage of the pandemic, the número de mortes por um milhão de habitantes. baseline date was defined as the day in which the Para levar em consideração o estágio da pandemia, 10th death was reported. The analyses included definiu-se como linha de base a data da décima 78 countries and territories which reported 10 morte em cada país. As análises incluíram 78 pa- or more deaths by April 9. On day 10, India had íses e territórios com 10 ou mais mortes relatadas 0.06 deaths per million, Belgium had 30.46 and até o dia 09 de abril.
    [Show full text]