DOCSLIB.ORG

Landfill Disposal Summary Energy Recovery/Incineration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Landfill Disposal Summary Energy Recovery/Incineration Landfill Disposal Summary Energy Recovery/Incineration Municipal/Commercial Solid pharmaceuticals Sewage Sludge Wood Waste Grand Total Waste Inland Empire Paper Co Spokane 17911 17911 Grand Total 17911 17911 Ponderay Newsprint Co _N/A 5413 5413 Pend Oreille 27200 3787 30987 Grand Total 27200 9200 36400 Spokane Regional Waste to _N/A 1162.42 1162.42 Energy Facility Lincoln 40.75 40.75 Pend Oreille 3.8 3.8 Spokane 242101.56 11.45 242113.01 Stevens 178.61 178.61 Whitman 22.16 22.16 Grand Total 243509.3 11.45 243520.75 Grand Total 243509.3 11.45 27200 27111 297831.75 Landfill Disposal Summary Inert Waste Landfill Ash (other than special Asphaltic Materials Vactor/Street Sweeping Waste mtg inert criteria per Aluminum Brick and Masonry Ceramic Materials Concrete Cured Concrete Glass Industrial Waste Soil, rock, gravel Soils (uncontaminated) Grand Total incinerator ash) (excluding roofing) Wastes WAC 173-350-990 (3) AAA MONROE ROCK CORP King 400000 400000 Snohomish 12000 22860 123795 158655 Grand Total 12000 22860 523795 558655 BP Cherry Point Refinery Whatcom 55 263 16260 16578 Inert Landfill Grand Total 55 263 16260 16578 Busy Bee Landfill Spokane 1 200 25 1 800 1 200 1228 Grand Total 1 200 25 1 800 1 200 1228 Cemex Inert Waste Landfill, King 75540.52 75540.52 Everett Snohomish 14616.07 5385.25 16153.86 72817.55 108972.73 Grand Total 14616.07 5385.25 16153.86 148358.07 184513.25 Central Pre-Mix Crestline Spokane 67700 67700 Grand Total 67700 67700 Central Pre-Mix Recycling Spokane 5000 5000 8th & Carnahan Grand Total 5000 5000 City of Kennewick Inert Benton 130 60 320 476 584 1570 Landfill Grand Total 130 60 320 476 584 1570 Douglas County Lux Pit Douglas 900 900 Grand Total 900 900 Filion Inert Demo Site Chelan 125 100 100 1100 1425 Grand Total 125 100 100 1100 1425 Hoquiam Demolition Grays Harbor 93.75 213.75 381.25 688.75 Grand Total 93.75 213.75 381.25 688.75 Inland Asphalt Landfill Spokane 30200 30200 Grand Total 30200 30200 McChord Inert Waste Pierce 10 8 18 Landfill Grand Total 10 8 18 Naval Magazine Indian Jefferson 2.7 5.6 8.3 Island Inert Waste Landfill Grand Total 2.7 5.6 8.3 Pipkin Wenatchee Golf Douglas 1350 1350 Developers Grand Total 1350 1350 Port Townsend Paper Inert Jefferson 7680 1940 9620 Waste Landfill Grand Total 7680 1940 9620 Prosser Inert Demo Landfill Benton 48.75 36.25 97.5 62.4 244.9 Grand Total 48.75 36.25 97.5 62.4 244.9 Spokane Rock Products - Spokane 13750 15208 4250 33208 Airway Pit Grand Total 13750 15208 4250 33208 Sumach Street Landfill Walla Walla 251 1300 1551 Grand Total 251 1300 1551 Waller Road Inert Landfill King 5000 20000 251848 276848 Pierce 15835 42480 5710 64025 Grand Total 20835 62480 5710 251848 340873 Wells Avenue Inert Waste Douglas 5800 5800 Landfill Grand Total 5800 5800 Grand Total 1 7680 62062.27 5565.25 1 53503.86 176034.6 5711 1940 695461.82 200 538.4 252432 1261131.2 Limited Landfill Disposal Summary Limited Purpose Landfill Ash (other than special Construction and Demolition Petroleum Contaminated Tires (disposed, stored, Asbestos Industrial Waste Inert Waste Landclearing Debris Lime Other Sewage Sludge Wood Waste Grand Total incinerator ash) Waste Soils collected) Anderson Limited Purpose King 37885 37885 Landfill Kittitas 2238 2238 Yakima 40123 46273 15375 1613.75 103384.75 Grand Total 80246 46273 15375 1613.75 143507.75 Asphalt & Gravel Products Yakima 2722 1735 4457 Inc Grand Total 2722 1735 4457 Avista Ash Landfill Stevens 1733.83 1733.83 Grand Total 1733.83 1733.83 Carothers Road Solid Waste _N/A 25 25 Site Whitman 143.99 204.97 348.96 Grand Total 168.99 204.97 373.96 Caton Limited Purpose Chelan 20 20 Landfill, LLC Clark 482 482 King 2450 2450 Kittitas 70 70 Snohomish 1100 1100 Yakima 14802 5968.75 1743.6 22514.35 Grand Total 18924 5968.75 1743.6 26636.35 County Construction Whatcom 2526.26 2526.26 Recyclers Grand Total 2526.26 2526.26 Graham Road Landfill _N/A 216.42 3323.93 59.2 1055.39 2779.7 7434.64 Adams 45.6 45.6 Benton 4.73 21 25.73 Chelan 20.93 1.5 0.08 22.51 Douglas 11.1 38.5 5.66 55.26 Franklin 2.1 14.25 24.75 43.71 84.81 Garfield 1.8 0.62 2.42 Grant 103.58 112.08 7.03 192.4 415.09 King 9.15 20.75 29.9 Kittitas 4.8 4.8 Lincoln 5.63 96.98 44.8 3.25 150.66 Okanogan 7.05 19.38 15.66 42.09 Pend Oreille 18.98 496 6.7 555.02 2 1078.7 Pierce 0.53 0.53 Snohomish 9.45 9.08 18.53 Spokane 1165.64 68023.83 39436.44 19088.15 8338.17 35.35 1661.04 137748.62 Stevens 17.18 96.68 19.36 0.77 0.75 134.74 Thurston 0.15 3.75 3.9 Walla Walla 8.63 1.75 10.38 Whatcom 2.48 2.48 Whitman 25.58 92 32.66 150.24 Yakima 2.1 6.25 8.35 Grand Total 1683.61 72377.71 39559.8 20182.79 11963.68 35.35 1667.04 147469.98 Kittitas County Limited Kittitas 28613 28613 Purpose Landfill Grand Total 28613 28613 Lady Island Landfill Clark 6637.5 422.1 7059.6 Grand Total 6637.5 422.1 7059.6 Lawson Limited Purpose Clallam 14804 14804 Landfill Grand Total 14804 14804 Shell Puget Sound Refinery Skagit 460 460 Grand Total 460 460 Stafford Creek Woodwaste Grays Harbor 20140.3 10416.9 30557.2 Landfill Grand Total 20140.3 10416.9 30557.2 Tesoro Refining & Marketing Skagit 278 278 Company Grand Total 278 278 Weyerhaeuser Regional _N/A 47 7113 185 7345 Landfill HQ Road Clark 430 430 Cowlitz 48579 3514 130453 980 183526 Grays Harbor 570 995 1565 King 7094 6504 13598 Lewis 1463 54 1517 Pacific 570 570 Pierce 1725 4509 6234 Skagit 2327 2327 Snohomish 662 662 Thurston 259 259 Grand Total 48579 17262 149978 2214 218033 Yakima Training Center Yakima 30 18.75 3960 4008.75 Landfill Grand Total 30 18.75 3960 4008.75 Grand Total 1852.6 65116.83 243046.24 149978 100174.05 15375 1613.75 20479.54 14177.68 460 35.35 18209.64 630518.68 Landfill Disposal Summary MSW Landfill Ash (other than special Asphaltic Materials Construction and Demolition Municipal/Commercial Solid Petroleum Contaminated Tires (disposed, stored, Vactor/Street Sweeping Asbestos Auto fluff Contaminated Soils (other) Industrial Waste Inert Waste Landclearing Debris Medical Waste Other Sewage Sludge Wood Waste Yard Debris Grand Total incinerator ash) (excluding roofing) Waste Waste Soils collected) Wastes Asotin County Regional N/A 29184.23 29184.23 Landfill Asotin 3.85 18147.97 18151.82 Garfield 1350.69 1350.69 Grand Total 3.85 48682.89 48686.74 Cedar Hills Landfill King 88 329 772 1.15 922588 5101 0.26 1738 930617.41 Grand Total 88 329 772 1.15 922588 5101 0.26 1738 930617.41 Cheyne Road Landfill Yakima 71065 71065 Grand Total 71065 71065 Cowlitz County Landfill Cowlitz 4 7270 5193 89757 102224 Wahkiakum 1641 1641 Grand Total 4 7270 5193 91398 103865 Delano Transfer Station Grant 250 4035.5 1 4286.5 Grand Total 250 4035.5 1 4286.5 Ephrata Landfill Grant 27.75 90458.25 90486 Grand Total 27.75 90458.25 90486 Greater Wenatchee Regional N/A 648.59 648.59 Landfill & Recycling Center Chelan 159.19 2211.2 5531.02 5707.91 88021.95 284.49 139.81 102055.57 Douglas 9.56 653.93 2340.81 693.56 21026.13 106.95 85.51 22.12 24938.57 Grant 10.69 1546.01 616.18 211.73 2384.61 King 4.96 21.68 9.33 5810.38 4868.43 10714.78 Kittitas 1.83 32122.45 483.82 1200.45 20.53 33829.08 Skagit 102.89 30437.41 30540.3 Snohomish 1005.47 28 338.87 14569.71 15942.05 Yakima 5417.08 5417.08 Grand Total 278.43 2865.13 8909.67 6401.47 142753.87 13057.77 52161.64 42.65 226470.63 Horn Rapids Landfill Benton 21101.75 823.25 31569.3 6138.18 54.1 13.96 59700.54 Franklin 15 5 20 Grand Total 21116.75 823.25 31574.3 6138.18 54.1 13.96 59720.54 LRI Landfill Pierce 274 151379 49303 118908 3635 2870 578016 904385 Grand Total 274 151379 49303 118908 3635 2870 578016 904385 North Stevens County N/A 126.09 126.09 Landfill Ferry 1109.92 1109.92 Stevens 2101.37 1232.99 274.23 26707.77 11.32 17.25 30344.93 Grand Total 2101.37 1232.99 274.23 27943.78 11.32 17.25 31580.94 Northside Landfill Spokane 2225 3 4946.61 7174.61 Stevens 0.39 0.39 Grand Total 2225 3 4947 7175 Okanogan Central Landfill Douglas 4635 4635 Okanogan 18.17 474.26 27141.74 6.98 27641.15 Grand Total 18.17 474.26 31776.74 6.98 32276.15 Roosevelt Regional Landfill N/A 21 477 21488 153015 191 5458 180650 MSW Adams 16421 16421 Benton 3123 3123 Ferry 1578 1578 Grays Harbor 15 58638 58653 Island 46929 46929 Jefferson 19248 19248 King 2521 209216 31831 4602 558578 806748 Klickitat 32 2175 4366 19282 13 2598 28466 Lewis 223 4660 9993 75938 1421 92235 Lincoln 2059 2059 Mason 420 35512 35932 Pend Oreille 8124 8124 Pierce 1168 12196 55129 1960 4961 75414 Skagit 96919 96919 Skamania 238 238 Snohomish 8 25361 35434 457540 50904 569247 Spokane 30858 2592 78218 24288 1395 137351 Thurston 25 177673 177698 Whatcom 18 246 847 60894 62005 Yakima 48 691 1068 316 2123 Grand Total 2863 274209 120096 1367719 641546 1711 13017 2421161 Sudbury Road Landfill Benton 11.18 12.31 23.49 Franklin 11.18 12.31 23.49 Walla Walla 43.67 35.44 715.09 58.29 59734.04 89.82 66 3.98 0.26 60746.59 Grand Total 66.03 35.44 715.09 58.29 59758.66 89.82 66 3.98 0.26 60793.57 Terrace Heights Landfill Yakima 685 164292 164977 Grand Total 685 164292 164977 Grand Total 4308.23 2101.37 2865.13 151379 363068.86 119711.26 130928.99 8189.81 274.23 2932.44 3637008.99 18248.59 693719.22 7891.83 13162.33 1738 17.94 0.26 5157546.48.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Municipal Waste Compliance Promotion Exercise 2014-5
    Municipal Waste Compliance Promotion Exercise 2014-5 Executive Summary mmmll Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 ISBN 978-92-79-60069-2 doi:10.2779/609002 © European Union, 2016 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Municipal Waste Compliance Promotion Exercise 2014-5 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................. 2 Abstract .......................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary.......................................................................................... 4 Background .................................................................................................. 4 Introduction to the project .............................................................................. 4 Method .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Technologies: Waste to Energy Facilities
    WASTE TECHNOLOGIES: WASTE TO ENERGY FACILITIES A Report for the Strategic Waste Infrastructure Planning (SWIP) Working Group Complied by WSP Environmental Ltd for the Government of Western Australia, Department of Environment and Conservation May 2013 Quality Management Issue/revision Issue 1 Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks Date May 2013 Prepared by Kevin Whiting, Steven Wood and Mick Fanning Signature Checked by Matthew Venn Signature Authorised by Kevin Whiting Signature Project number 00038022 Report number File reference Project number: 00038022 Dated: May 2013 2 Revised: Waste Technologies: Waste to Energy Facilities A Report for the Strategic Waste Infrastructure Planning (SWIP) Working Group, commissioned by the Government of Western Australia, Department of Environment and Conservation. May 2013 Client Waste Management Branch Department of Environment and Conservation Level 4 The Atrium, 168 St George’s Terrace, PERTH, WA 6000 Locked Bag 104 Bentley DC WA 6983 Consultants Kevin Whiting Head of Energy-from-Waste & Biomass Tel: +44 207 7314 4647 [email protected] Mick Fanning Associate Consultant Tel: +44 207 7314 5883 [email protected] Steven Wood Principal Consultant Tel: +44 121 3524768 [email protected] Registered Address WSP Environmental Limited 01152332 WSP House, 70 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1AF 3 Table of Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................. 6 1.1 Objectives ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Waste to Energy and Liquid Fuel Plants: Key to Sustainable Solid Waste Management
    Integrated Waste to Energy and Liquid Fuel Plants: Key to Sustainable Solid Waste Management Bary Wilson, Ph.D. Barry Liss, Ph.D., P.E Brandon Wilson, Ph.D., P.E May 2019 EnviroPower Renewable, Inc. 7301A Palmetto Parkway Rd. Suite 206B Boca Raton, FL 33433 www.eprenewable.com EPR Doc. 05212019 © 2019 EPR All Rights Reserved 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Plastics................................................................................................................................................... 5 Plastics Recycling................................................................................................................................... 6 Diesel Fuels ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Premium Diesel ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Biodiesel and Renewable Diesel ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Composting.Pdf
    CCET guideline series on intermediate municipal solid waste treatment technologies Composting Prevention Product (Non-Waste) Preparing for re-use Recycling Recovery Disposal Technological Waste aspects Financial aspects Governance capability Institutional aspects Public awareness & cooperation of residents Social conditions United Nations Avenue, Gigiri National Institute for Environmental Studies IGES Centre Collaborating with UNEP PO Box 30552, 00100 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, on Environmental Technologies (CCET) Nairobi, Kenya Ibaraki 305-8506, 2108-11 Kamiyamaguchi, Hayama, Tel: +254 (0)20 762 1234 Japan Kanagawa 240-0115, Email: [email protected] www.nies.go.jp/index-e.html Japan www.unep.org Tel: +81-46-855-3840 www.ccet.jp Economy Division International Environmental Technology Centre 2-110 Ryokuchi koen, Tsurumi-ku, Osaka 538-0036, Japan Tel: +81 6 6915 4581 Email: [email protected] www.unep.org/ietc August 2020 CCET guideline series on intermediate municipal solid waste treatment technologies: Composting Authors Copyright Kosuke Kawai (National Institute for Environmental © United Nations Environment Programme, 2020 Studies, NIES), Chen Liu (Institute for Global This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part Environmental Strategies, IGES), and Premakumara and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes Jagath Dickella Gamaralalage (IGES) without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. Project Coordination of CCET Guideline series The United Nations Environment Programme would Kazunobu Onogawa (IGES), Yasuhiko Hotta (IGES), appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses Keith Alverson (UNEP IETC), Shunichi Honda (UNEP this publication as a source. IETC), Misato Dilley (UNEP IETC) No use of this publication may be made for resale or for Peer Reviewers any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior Members of the Japan Society of Material Cycles and permission in writing the United Nations Environment Waste Management (JSMCWM): Kiyohiko Nakasaki Programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Inert Landfill Operations Inert Waste Definition
    Inert Landfill Operations Inert Waste Definition North Dakota Administrative Code 33-20-01.1-03 (26) defines inert waste as: “Inert waste” means nonputrescible solid waste which will not generally contaminate water or form a contaminated leachate. Inert waste does not serve as food for vectors. Inert waste includes, but is not limited to: construction and demolition material such as metal, wood, bricks, masonry and cement concrete; asphalt concrete; metal; tree branches; bottom ash from coal fired boilers; and waste coal fines from air pollution control equipment. Acceptable Wastes for Disposal? Yes (although concrete could No (aerosol cans, chemical be recycled) containers and electronics are not inert) Acceptable Wastes for Disposal? No (household waste could attract No (could attract vectors, vectors, create leachate putrescible) and/or be putrescible) Waste Collected for Non-Disposal Management • Major Appliances: – Freezers, Refrigerators, Ovens, Water Heaters, etc. – May require Freon removal with licensed equipment or removal of residual liquids – Aka “White Goods” • Scrap Metal Waste Collected for Non-Disposal Management • Grass and Leaves: – Manage by Composting – Separate from Burn Pile and Disposal Area – Soil Amendment for Cover or for Contractor/Resident Landscaping Projects – Run-off Management Waste Collected for Non-Disposal Management • Electronics*: No! – Challenging waste to recycle: • Storage • Outlet • May Contain Heavy Metals and Other Toxic Substances – Aka “E-Waste” or “Brown Goods” – Recycling Facilities and MSW
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix H Acronyms and Definitions
    Solid Waste Management Plan Appendix H Acronyms and Definitions APPENDIX H Solid Waste Management Plan Acronyms ACM Asbestos Containing Materials C&D Construction and Demolition CDL Construction, Demolition, Landclearing and Inert Waste CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations CY Cubic Yard Ecology Washington State Department of Ecology EDC (Spokane) Economic Development Council EPA (U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency EPP Environmentally Preferable Purchasing EPR Extended Producer Responsibility HDPE High-Density Polyethylene HHW Household Hazardous Waste HWMA (Washington) Hazardous Waste Management Act LDPE Low-Density Polyethylene LQG Large Quantity Generators MFS Minimum Functional Standards for Solid Waste Handling MQG Medium Quantity Generators MRF Material Recovery Facility MRW Moderate Risk Waste MRW Plan Moderate Risk Waste Management Plan MSW Municipal Solid Waste MTCA Model Toxics Control Act NESHAP National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants NOC Notice of Construction NPL National Priorities List NSLF Northside Landfill NWPSC Northwest Product Stewardship Council OFM Office of Financial Management (State of Washington) ONP Old Newsprint PAYT Pay As You Throw PETE Polyethylene Terephthalate PS Polystyrene PSI Product Stewardship Institute PVC Polyvinyl Chloride H - 1 Solid Waste Management Plan RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RCW Revised Code of Washington RDC Regional Disposal Company RPWRF Riverside Park Water Reclamation Facility
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Recovery/Incineration 2009
    Energy Recovery/Incineration Municipal/Commercial Solid 2009 pharmaceuticals Wood Waste Grand Total Waste Inland Empire Paper Co Spokane 17,435.00 17,435.00 Grand Total 17,435.00 17,435.00 Spokane Regional Waste to _N/A 1,225.98 1,225.98 Energy Facility Lincoln 65.01 65.01 Pend Oreille 7.77 7.77 Spokane 258,150.77 17.76 258,168.53 Stevens 181.08 181.08 Whitman 17.65 17.65 Grand Total 259,648.26 17.76 259,666.02 Grand Total 259,648.26 17.76 17,435.00 277,101.02 Municipal/Commercial Solid pharmaceuticals Wood Waste Grand Total Waste Inert Waste Landfill Ash (other Asphaltic Vactor/Str 2009 Contamina Soils than special Materials Brick and Ceramic Cured Industrial Inert Soil, rock, eet Grand Aluminum ted Soils Glass Other (uncontami incinerator (excluding Masonry Materials Concrete Waste Waste gravel Sweeping Total (other) nated) ash) roofing) Wastes AAA MONROE ROCK CORP Snohomish 14,000.00 400.00 11,195.00 130,044.00 155,639.00 Grand Total 14,000.00 400.00 11,195.00 130,044.00 155,639.00 Atlas Sand & Gravel - _N/A 90,000.00 90,000.00 Chipman Landfill Whitman 10,100.00 18,200.00 161.00 28,461.00 Grand Total 10,100.00 18,200.00 90,161.00 118,461.00 BP Cherry Point Refinery Whatcom 60.00 194.00 6,473.00 6,727.00 Inert Landfill Grand Total 60.00 194.00 6,473.00 6,727.00 Busy Bee Landfill Spokane 1.00 50.00 15.00 1.00 300.00 0.50 100.00 467.50 Grand Total 1.00 50.00 15.00 1.00 300.00 0.50 100.00 467.50 Cemex Inert Waste Landfill, King 67,426.00 67,426.00 Everett Skagit 4.00 4.00 Snohomish 16,302.00 13,644.00 13,235.00 90,783.00 133,964.00 Grand Total 16,302.00 81,074.00 13,235.00 90,783.00 201,394.00 Central Pre-Mix Concrete Co.
    [Show full text]
  • 01-74-19 Construction Waste Management
    California Polytechnic State University April 15, 2020 [Project Name – MJ00##] SECTION 01 74 19 - CONSTRUCTION WASTE MANAGEMENT PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 1 Specification Sections, apply to this Section. 1.2 SUMMARY A. Section includes requirements and procedures for ensuring optimal diversion of construction and demolition (C&D) waste materials generated by the Work from landfill disposal within the limits of the Construction Schedule and Contract Sum. 1. California State law (Public Resources Code sections 40000 et seq.) requires the California State University to develop source reduction, re-use, recycling, and composting programs to divert 75% of all solid waste from landfill disposal by 2020. Construction waste materials generated by the Work are targeted to achieve and maintain these diversion rates. 2. The Work of this Contract requires that a minimum of 75% by weight of the construction and demolition materials generated in the Work is diverted from landfill disposal through a combination of re-use and recycling activities. 3. For LEED® projects, requirements for submittal of LEED documentation in compliance with the Materials and Resources category, Construction and Demolition Waste Management credit. 4. Requirements for submittal of Contractor’s Construction Waste and Recycling Plan prior to the commencement of the Work. 5. Contractor’s quantitative reports for construction waste materials as a condition of approval of the third progress payment. 1.3 DEFINITIONS A. Class III Landfill: A landfill that accepts non-hazardous resources such as household, commercial, and industrial waste, resulting from construction, remodeling, repair, and demolition operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste to Energy in the Age of the Circular Economy Best Practice Handbook
    WASTE TO ENERGY IN THE AGE OF THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY BEST PRACTICE HANDBOOK NOVEMBER 2020 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK WASTE TO ENERGY IN THE AGE OF THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY BEST PRACTICE HANDBOOK NOVEMBER 2020 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2020 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 8632 4444; Fax +63 2 8636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2020. ISBN: 978-92-9262-480-4 (print); 978-92-9262-481-1 (electronic); 978-92-9262-482-8 (ebook) Publication Stock No. TIM200330-2 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/TIM200330-2 The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Slag from the Combustion of Solid Municipal Waste As a Partial Replacement of Cement in Mortar and Concrete
    materials Article Use of Slag from the Combustion of Solid Municipal Waste as A Partial Replacement of Cement in Mortar and Concrete Monika Czop 1,* and Beata Ła´zniewska-Piekarczyk 2 1 Department of Technologies and Installations for Waste Management, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, The Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 18, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland 2 Department of Building Engineering and Building Physics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, The Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 5, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +483-2237-2104 Received: 10 March 2020; Accepted: 30 March 2020; Published: 31 March 2020 Abstract: In Europe, the use of wastes in the cement and construction industry follows the assumptions of sustainability and the idea of circular economy. At present, it is observed that cement plants introduce wastes to the cement in the form of so-called mineral additives. The most often used mineral additives are: fly ash with silica fume, granulated blast furnace slag and silica fume. The use of mineral additives in the cement is related to the fact that the use of the most expensive component of cement—Portland cement clinker—is limited. The purpose of the article is a preliminary evaluation of the suitability of slag from the municipal solid waste incineration plant for its use as a replacement of cement. In this article, slag from the municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) replaces cement in the quantity of 30%, and presents the content of oxides and elements of slag from the MSWI. The obtained results are compared to the requirements that the crushed and granulated blast furnace slag need to meet to be suitable for use as an additive of type II to the concrete.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 29 Waste Ordinance
    PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 29 WASTE ORDINANCE Article I. § 29.1. Definitions Article II. § 29.2. Purpose Article III. § 29.3. Solid Waste Disposal Prohibited § 29.3.1. Solid Waste Disposal Approval Requirements § 29.3.2. Public Participation § 29.3.3. Acting upon Request for Approval § 29.3.4. Finding Required for Approval § 29.3.5. Record for Request Shall be Kept § 29.4. Approval Prohibited § 29.5. Revocation of Approval § 29.6. Noncompliance and Penalties § 29.7. Must Meet All Other Rules and Regulations § 29.8. Adjudication in Part § 29.9. Application CHAPTER 29 WASTE ORDINANCE Article I. SEC. 29.1. DEFINITIONS. 1. “Aquifer” means a geologic formation, group of formations, or a portion of a formation capable of yielding usable quantities of ground water to wells or springs. 2 “Ash” means waste material produced from an incineration process or any combustion. Ash types include: fly ash, bottom ash, and incinerator residue. 3. “Board” means the Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors. 4. “Bottom Ash” means ash or slag remaining in an incinerator or boiler unit after combustion. 5. “By Product Material” means a material that is not one of the primary products of a production process and is not solely or separately produced by the production process. By- product does not include a co-product that is produced for the general public's use and is ordinarily used in the form that is produced by the process. 6. “Commercial Chemical Product” means a chemical substance which is manufactured or formulated for commercial, agricultural or manufacturing use. This term includes a manufacturing chemical intermediate, off-specification chemical product, which, if it met specification, would have been a chemical product or intermediate.
    [Show full text]
  • ENERGY POTENTIAL of SOLID WASTE GENERATED at a TERTIARY INSTITUTION: ESTIMATIONS and CHALLENGES Adelere E
    ENERGY POTENTIAL OF SOLID WASTE GENERATED AT A TERTIARY INSTITUTION: ESTIMATIONS AND CHALLENGES Adelere E. Adeniran 1, AbdulGaniyu O. Adelopo 2,*, Adetinuke T. Aina 2, Afolasade T. Nubi 2 and Oluwatobi O. Apena 3 1 Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Lagos, Nigeria 2 Works & Physical Planning Department, University of Lagos, Nigeria 3 Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Lagos, Nigeria Article Info: ABSTRACT Received: Waste to energy (WtE) refers to any treatment process that creates energy in the 10 April 2019 Revised: form of electricity or heat from a waste source. This research reviews the potential 10 June 2019 uses of municipal solid waste generated at the University of Lagos, Akoka campus Accepted: as a sustainable energy source for the tertiary institution. Waste characterization 02 July 2019 study of the residual waste at the University’s sorting centre was conducted to de- Available online: termine the amount, composition and physical properties of the waste. A novel com- 01 August 2019 positional trending ratio (CTR) was used to evaluate the possible calorific variation Keywords: in samples using ASTMD3286-77 method. A validation of the experimental results Waste to energy was carried out using energy estimation model described by Smith and Scott (2005) Residual waste Calorific value and World Bank (1999). The major components of the residual waste were mainly Moisture content polythene materials (24%), inert (30%), organic waste (15%), and paper (15%). The Municipal solid waste average calorific value of 17.23 MJ/kg and moisture content of 41.3% could poten- tially generate 34, 787 kWh daily (about 48.32% of the 72,000 kWh energy demand of the University).
    [Show full text]