DOCSLIB.ORG

Energy Recovery/Incineration 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Energy Recovery/Incineration 2009 Energy Recovery/Incineration Municipal/Commercial Solid 2009 pharmaceuticals Wood Waste Grand Total Waste Inland Empire Paper Co Spokane 17,435.00 17,435.00 Grand Total 17,435.00 17,435.00 Spokane Regional Waste to _N/A 1,225.98 1,225.98 Energy Facility Lincoln 65.01 65.01 Pend Oreille 7.77 7.77 Spokane 258,150.77 17.76 258,168.53 Stevens 181.08 181.08 Whitman 17.65 17.65 Grand Total 259,648.26 17.76 259,666.02 Grand Total 259,648.26 17.76 17,435.00 277,101.02 Municipal/Commercial Solid pharmaceuticals Wood Waste Grand Total Waste Inert Waste Landfill Ash (other Asphaltic Vactor/Str 2009 Contamina Soils than special Materials Brick and Ceramic Cured Industrial Inert Soil, rock, eet Grand Aluminum ted Soils Glass Other (uncontami incinerator (excluding Masonry Materials Concrete Waste Waste gravel Sweeping Total (other) nated) ash) roofing) Wastes AAA MONROE ROCK CORP Snohomish 14,000.00 400.00 11,195.00 130,044.00 155,639.00 Grand Total 14,000.00 400.00 11,195.00 130,044.00 155,639.00 Atlas Sand & Gravel - _N/A 90,000.00 90,000.00 Chipman Landfill Whitman 10,100.00 18,200.00 161.00 28,461.00 Grand Total 10,100.00 18,200.00 90,161.00 118,461.00 BP Cherry Point Refinery Whatcom 60.00 194.00 6,473.00 6,727.00 Inert Landfill Grand Total 60.00 194.00 6,473.00 6,727.00 Busy Bee Landfill Spokane 1.00 50.00 15.00 1.00 300.00 0.50 100.00 467.50 Grand Total 1.00 50.00 15.00 1.00 300.00 0.50 100.00 467.50 Cemex Inert Waste Landfill, King 67,426.00 67,426.00 Everett Skagit 4.00 4.00 Snohomish 16,302.00 13,644.00 13,235.00 90,783.00 133,964.00 Grand Total 16,302.00 81,074.00 13,235.00 90,783.00 201,394.00 Central Pre-Mix Concrete Co. Spokane 19,000.00 19,000.00 38,000.00 - Crestline Grand Total 19,000.00 19,000.00 38,000.00 City of Kennewick Inert Benton 160.00 70.00 284.00 920.00 1,434.00 Landfill Grand Total 160.00 70.00 284.00 920.00 1,434.00 Clark Inert Landfill Whitman 5.00 25.00 30.00 Grand Total 5.00 25.00 30.00 D & N Enterprises Asotin 10.00 8.00 20.00 26.00 64.00 Grand Total 10.00 8.00 20.00 26.00 64.00 Dickson S 50th & Tyler Pierce 25.00 25.00 Grand Total 25.00 25.00 Douglas County Lux Pit Douglas 225.00 675.00 900.00 Grand Total 225.00 675.00 900.00 Everett Water Filtration Snohomish 0.00 0.00 Plant Grand Total 0.00 0.00 Filion Inert Demo Site Chelan 400.00 60.00 1,980.00 570.00 3,010.00 Grand Total 400.00 60.00 1,980.00 570.00 3,010.00 Hoquiam Demolition Grays Harbor 25.00 6.25 306.25 1,483.75 1,821.25 Grand Total 25.00 6.25 306.25 1,483.75 1,821.25 Inland Asphalt Landfill Spokane 11,250.00 11,250.00 22,500.00 Grand Total 11,250.00 11,250.00 22,500.00 McChord Inert Waste Pierce 37.00 10.00 47.00 Landfill Grand Total 37.00 10.00 47.00 Naval Magazine Indian Jefferson 37.70 16.80 54.50 Island Inert Waste Landfill Grand Total 37.70 16.80 54.50 Port Townsend Paper Inert Jefferson 6,320.30 798.70 7,119.00 Waste Landfill Grand Total 6,320.30 798.70 7,119.00 Prosser Inert Waste Landfill Benton 50.00 12.50 50.00 40.00 152.50 Grand Total 50.00 12.50 50.00 40.00 152.50 Spokane Rock Products - Spokane 2,914.00 12,666.00 15,580.00 Airway Pit Grand Total 2,914.00 12,666.00 15,580.00 Sumach Pit Walla Walla 625.00 1,875.00 1,250.00 3,750.00 Grand Total 625.00 1,875.00 1,250.00 3,750.00 Waller Road Inert Landfill King 10,730.00 10,730.00 Pierce 4,232.00 1,711.00 94,432.00 100,375.00 Grand Total 4,232.00 1,711.00 105,162.00 111,105.00 Wells Avenue Inert Waste Douglas 2,568.00 2,500.00 5,068.00 Landfill Grand Total 2,568.00 2,500.00 5,068.00 Grand Total 1.00 6,320.30 77,753.70 549.25 1.00 81,074.00 97,067.55 1,711.50 798.70 25.00 0.00 231,141.75 195,945.00 960.00 693,348.75 Ash (other Asphaltic Vactor/Str Contamina Soils than special Materials Brick and Ceramic Cured Industrial Inert Soil, rock, eet Grand Aluminum ted Soils Glass Other (uncontami incinerator (excluding Masonry Materials Concrete Waste Waste gravel Sweeping Total (other) nated) ash) roofing) Wastes Limited Purpose Landfill Ash (other 2009 Construction Petroleum Special than Industrial Recycling Sewage Tires Wood Asbestos & Demolition Inert Waste Lime Contaminated Waste Yard Debris Grand Total special Waste residuals Sludge (disposed) Waste Debris Soils (permitted) incinerator Anderson Limited Purpose Kittitas 3,190.00 3,190.00 Landfill Yakima 60,695.00 1,164.35 2,152.20 64,011.55 Grand Total 63,885.00 1,164.35 2,152.20 67,201.55 Avista Ash Landfill Stevens 15,324.40 15,324.40 Grand Total 15,324.40 15,324.40 Carothers Road Solid Waste Whitman 46.03 336.01 382.04 Site Grand Total 46.03 336.01 382.04 Caton Limited Purpose Chelan 494.00 494.00 Landfill, LLC King 35,340.00 35,340.00 Kittitas 932.00 932.00 Pierce 1,040.00 1,040.00 Snohomish 4,546.00 4,546.00 Yakima 11,604.00 2,306.25 70.00 1,755.60 6.25 15,742.10 Grand Total 53,956.00 2,306.25 70.00 1,755.60 6.25 58,094.10 Graham Road Recycling & _N/A 157.13 3,005.62 19.68 2,091.43 744.10 11.25 6,029.21 Disp Adams 162.02 9.48 39.30 210.80 Asotin 0.15 0.15 Benton 5.97 1.34 7.31 Chelan 18.23 1.50 19.73 Cowlitz 2.55 2.55 Douglas 4.50 5.75 10.25 Ferry 3.90 1.75 5.65 Franklin 7.88 3.10 10.98 Grant 12.35 7.50 95.68 6.76 122.29 Grays Harbor 0.15 0.15 King 15.38 66.20 0.02 81.60 Kittitas 1.58 1.58 Klickitat 1.97 1.97 Lewis 0.53 0.53 Lincoln 24.53 39.11 30.40 5.84 7.13 107.01 Okanogan 3.98 3.98 Pend Oreille 16.05 3.50 25.70 13.98 59.23 Pierce 3.98 32.63 36.61 Snohomish 2.70 3.45 6.15 Spokane 1,742.13 60,033.11 20,910.11 30,742.41 15,630.32 115.80 3,566.25 132,740.13 Stevens 11.10 10.88 23.52 4.25 49.75 Walla Walla 7.35 3.00 10.35 Whitman 58.95 125.45 2,672.38 0.75 2,857.53 Yakima 1.50 0.68 2.18 Grand Total 2,266.56 63,350.95 20,983.71 35,630.70 16,438.73 121.64 3,585.38 142,377.67 Kittitas County Limited Kittitas 10,043.00 10,043.00 Purpose Landfill Grand Total 10,043.00 10,043.00 Lady Island Landfill Clark 4,030.00 3,366.00 7,396.00 Grand Total 4,030.00 3,366.00 7,396.00 Lawson Limited Purpose Clallam 9,232.00 9,232.00 Landfill Grand Total 9,232.00 9,232.00 Shell Puget Sound Refinery Skagit 460.00 460.00 Grand Total 460.00 460.00 Stafford Creek Woodwaste Grays Harbor 27,172.50 742.50 27,915.00 Landfill Grand Total 27,172.50 742.50 27,915.00 Tesoro Refining & Marketing Skagit 553.00 553.00 Company Grand Total 553.00 553.00 TransAlta Centralia Mining Lewis 51,079.70 132.00 51,211.70 LLC Grand Total 51,079.70 132.00 51,211.70 Weyerhaeuser Regional _N/A 1,271.00 6.00 2,719.00 132.00 504.00 4,632.00 Landfill Clark 172.00 172.00 Cowlitz 53,561.00 7,814.00 99,095.00 6,422.00 166,892.00 Grays Harbor 45.00 1.00 1,049.00 1,095.00 King 14,778.00 14,778.00 Kitsap 1,941.00 1,941.00 Lewis 27.00 30.00 57.00 Pierce 19.00 9,033.00 9,052.00 Skagit 1,717.00 1,717.00 Thurston 251.00 32,011.00 32,262.00 Wahkiakum 1,653.00 1,653.00 Grand Total 54,877.00 11,696.00 103,719.00 39,644.00 24,315.00 234,251.00 Yakima Training Center Yakima 48.00 70.00 15.00 133.00 Landfill Grand Total 48.00 70.00 15.00 133.00 Grand Total 2,312.59 121,329.10 230,509.46 113,636.00 27,334.96 1,234.35 75,274.70 24,315.00 460.00 16,438.73 121.64 11,601.68 6.25 624,574.46 Ash (other than Construction Petroleum Special Industrial Recycling Sewage Tires Wood Asbestos special & Demolition Inert Waste Lime Contaminated Waste Yard Debris Grand Total Waste residuals Sludge (disposed) Waste incinerator Debris Soils (permitted) ash) MSW Landfill Ash (other Constructi 2009 Contamina Food Landclear Municipal/ Petroleum than special on & Industrial Inert Medical Sewage Tires Wood Yard Asbestos Auto fluff ted Soils Processing Glass ing Commercial Other Contamin Grand Total incinerator Demolition Waste Waste Waste Sludge (disposed) Waste Debris (other) Waste Debris Solid Waste ated Soils ash) Debris Asotin County Regional _N/A 27,881.35 27,881.35 Landfill Asotin 18,130.45 18,130.45 Garfield 1,277.82 1,277.82 Grand Total 47,289.62 47,289.62 Cedar Hills Regional Landfill King 5.00 393.00 1.00 859,226.00 7,852.00 5.00 867,482.00 Grand Total 5.00 393.00 1.00 859,226.00 7,852.00 5.00 867,482.00 Cheyne Road Landfill Yakima 71,104.00 71,104.00 Grand Total 71,104.00 71,104.00 Cowlitz County Landfill Cowlitz 2.00 5,988.00 2,915.00 85,717.00 94,622.00 Wahkiakum 1,543.00 1,543.00 Grand Total 2.00 5,988.00 2,915.00 87,260.00 96,165.00 Delano Transfer Station Grant 200.00 200.00 Grand Total 200.00 200.00 Ephrata Landfill Grant 73.80 90,443.11 90,516.91 Grand Total 73.80 90,443.11 90,516.91 Greater Wenatchee Regional _N/A 786.45 786.45 Landfill & Recycling Center Chelan 91,050.01 91,050.01 Douglas 491.79 6,892.75 4,401.93 10,760.13 2,342.57 347.41 73.61 0.91 25,311.10 King 4,703.28 4,703.28 Kittitas 30,845.56 30,845.56 Klickitat 834.80 834.80 Okanogan 196.43 196.43 Skagit 21,850.16 21,850.16 Snohomish 4,932.60 4,932.60 Stevens 80.18 80.18 Whitman 121.36 121.36 Yakima 363.56 363.56 Grand Total 491.79 6,892.75 4,401.93 132,655.70 7,638.73 28,798.71 73.61 122.27 181,075.49 Horn Rapids Sanitary Landfill Benton 18,594.00 709.00 1,541.00 31,195.00 24.00 4.00 421.00 52,488.00 Franklin 15.00 5.00 20.00 Grand Total 18,609.00 709.00 1,541.00 31,200.00 24.00 4.00 421.00 52,508.00 LRI Landfill Pierce 736.00 161,090.00 33,136.00 232,623.00 2,841.00 565,708.00 4,723.00 1,000,857.00 Grand Total 736.00 161,090.00 33,136.00 232,623.00 2,841.00 565,708.00 4,723.00 1,000,857.00 North Stevens County _N/A 114.94 114.94 Landfill Ferry 662.97 662.97 Stevens 1,095.55 1,401.41 646.21 204.49 25,661.03 28.81 29,037.50 Grand Total 1,095.55 1,401.41 646.21 204.49 26,438.94 28.81 29,815.41 Northside Landfill Spokane 2,008.33 4.42 4,927.01 6,939.76 Grand Total 2,008.33 4.42 4,927.01 6,939.76 Okanogan Central Landfill Douglas 4,869.57 4,869.57
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Municipal Waste Compliance Promotion Exercise 2014-5
    Municipal Waste Compliance Promotion Exercise 2014-5 Executive Summary mmmll Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 ISBN 978-92-79-60069-2 doi:10.2779/609002 © European Union, 2016 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Municipal Waste Compliance Promotion Exercise 2014-5 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................. 2 Abstract .......................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary.......................................................................................... 4 Background .................................................................................................. 4 Introduction to the project .............................................................................. 4 Method .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Technologies: Waste to Energy Facilities
    WASTE TECHNOLOGIES: WASTE TO ENERGY FACILITIES A Report for the Strategic Waste Infrastructure Planning (SWIP) Working Group Complied by WSP Environmental Ltd for the Government of Western Australia, Department of Environment and Conservation May 2013 Quality Management Issue/revision Issue 1 Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks Date May 2013 Prepared by Kevin Whiting, Steven Wood and Mick Fanning Signature Checked by Matthew Venn Signature Authorised by Kevin Whiting Signature Project number 00038022 Report number File reference Project number: 00038022 Dated: May 2013 2 Revised: Waste Technologies: Waste to Energy Facilities A Report for the Strategic Waste Infrastructure Planning (SWIP) Working Group, commissioned by the Government of Western Australia, Department of Environment and Conservation. May 2013 Client Waste Management Branch Department of Environment and Conservation Level 4 The Atrium, 168 St George’s Terrace, PERTH, WA 6000 Locked Bag 104 Bentley DC WA 6983 Consultants Kevin Whiting Head of Energy-from-Waste & Biomass Tel: +44 207 7314 4647 [email protected] Mick Fanning Associate Consultant Tel: +44 207 7314 5883 [email protected] Steven Wood Principal Consultant Tel: +44 121 3524768 [email protected] Registered Address WSP Environmental Limited 01152332 WSP House, 70 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1AF 3 Table of Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................. 6 1.1 Objectives ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Landfill Disposal Summary Energy Recovery/Incineration
    Landfill Disposal Summary Energy Recovery/Incineration Municipal/Commercial Solid pharmaceuticals Sewage Sludge Wood Waste Grand Total Waste Inland Empire Paper Co Spokane 17911 17911 Grand Total 17911 17911 Ponderay Newsprint Co _N/A 5413 5413 Pend Oreille 27200 3787 30987 Grand Total 27200 9200 36400 Spokane Regional Waste to _N/A 1162.42 1162.42 Energy Facility Lincoln 40.75 40.75 Pend Oreille 3.8 3.8 Spokane 242101.56 11.45 242113.01 Stevens 178.61 178.61 Whitman 22.16 22.16 Grand Total 243509.3 11.45 243520.75 Grand Total 243509.3 11.45 27200 27111 297831.75 Landfill Disposal Summary Inert Waste Landfill Ash (other than special Asphaltic Materials Vactor/Street Sweeping Waste mtg inert criteria per Aluminum Brick and Masonry Ceramic Materials Concrete Cured Concrete Glass Industrial Waste Soil, rock, gravel Soils (uncontaminated) Grand Total incinerator ash) (excluding roofing) Wastes WAC 173-350-990 (3) AAA MONROE ROCK CORP King 400000 400000 Snohomish 12000 22860 123795 158655 Grand Total 12000 22860 523795 558655 BP Cherry Point Refinery Whatcom 55 263 16260 16578 Inert Landfill Grand Total 55 263 16260 16578 Busy Bee Landfill Spokane 1 200 25 1 800 1 200 1228 Grand Total 1 200 25 1 800 1 200 1228 Cemex Inert Waste Landfill, King 75540.52 75540.52 Everett Snohomish 14616.07 5385.25 16153.86 72817.55 108972.73 Grand Total 14616.07 5385.25 16153.86 148358.07 184513.25 Central Pre-Mix Crestline Spokane 67700 67700 Grand Total 67700 67700 Central Pre-Mix Recycling Spokane 5000 5000 8th & Carnahan Grand Total 5000 5000 City of Kennewick
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Waste to Energy and Liquid Fuel Plants: Key to Sustainable Solid Waste Management
    Integrated Waste to Energy and Liquid Fuel Plants: Key to Sustainable Solid Waste Management Bary Wilson, Ph.D. Barry Liss, Ph.D., P.E Brandon Wilson, Ph.D., P.E May 2019 EnviroPower Renewable, Inc. 7301A Palmetto Parkway Rd. Suite 206B Boca Raton, FL 33433 www.eprenewable.com EPR Doc. 05212019 © 2019 EPR All Rights Reserved 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Plastics................................................................................................................................................... 5 Plastics Recycling................................................................................................................................... 6 Diesel Fuels ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Premium Diesel ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Biodiesel and Renewable Diesel ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Composting.Pdf
    CCET guideline series on intermediate municipal solid waste treatment technologies Composting Prevention Product (Non-Waste) Preparing for re-use Recycling Recovery Disposal Technological Waste aspects Financial aspects Governance capability Institutional aspects Public awareness & cooperation of residents Social conditions United Nations Avenue, Gigiri National Institute for Environmental Studies IGES Centre Collaborating with UNEP PO Box 30552, 00100 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, on Environmental Technologies (CCET) Nairobi, Kenya Ibaraki 305-8506, 2108-11 Kamiyamaguchi, Hayama, Tel: +254 (0)20 762 1234 Japan Kanagawa 240-0115, Email: [email protected] www.nies.go.jp/index-e.html Japan www.unep.org Tel: +81-46-855-3840 www.ccet.jp Economy Division International Environmental Technology Centre 2-110 Ryokuchi koen, Tsurumi-ku, Osaka 538-0036, Japan Tel: +81 6 6915 4581 Email: [email protected] www.unep.org/ietc August 2020 CCET guideline series on intermediate municipal solid waste treatment technologies: Composting Authors Copyright Kosuke Kawai (National Institute for Environmental © United Nations Environment Programme, 2020 Studies, NIES), Chen Liu (Institute for Global This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part Environmental Strategies, IGES), and Premakumara and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes Jagath Dickella Gamaralalage (IGES) without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. Project Coordination of CCET Guideline series The United Nations Environment Programme would Kazunobu Onogawa (IGES), Yasuhiko Hotta (IGES), appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses Keith Alverson (UNEP IETC), Shunichi Honda (UNEP this publication as a source. IETC), Misato Dilley (UNEP IETC) No use of this publication may be made for resale or for Peer Reviewers any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior Members of the Japan Society of Material Cycles and permission in writing the United Nations Environment Waste Management (JSMCWM): Kiyohiko Nakasaki Programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Inert Landfill Operations Inert Waste Definition
    Inert Landfill Operations Inert Waste Definition North Dakota Administrative Code 33-20-01.1-03 (26) defines inert waste as: “Inert waste” means nonputrescible solid waste which will not generally contaminate water or form a contaminated leachate. Inert waste does not serve as food for vectors. Inert waste includes, but is not limited to: construction and demolition material such as metal, wood, bricks, masonry and cement concrete; asphalt concrete; metal; tree branches; bottom ash from coal fired boilers; and waste coal fines from air pollution control equipment. Acceptable Wastes for Disposal? Yes (although concrete could No (aerosol cans, chemical be recycled) containers and electronics are not inert) Acceptable Wastes for Disposal? No (household waste could attract No (could attract vectors, vectors, create leachate putrescible) and/or be putrescible) Waste Collected for Non-Disposal Management • Major Appliances: – Freezers, Refrigerators, Ovens, Water Heaters, etc. – May require Freon removal with licensed equipment or removal of residual liquids – Aka “White Goods” • Scrap Metal Waste Collected for Non-Disposal Management • Grass and Leaves: – Manage by Composting – Separate from Burn Pile and Disposal Area – Soil Amendment for Cover or for Contractor/Resident Landscaping Projects – Run-off Management Waste Collected for Non-Disposal Management • Electronics*: No! – Challenging waste to recycle: • Storage • Outlet • May Contain Heavy Metals and Other Toxic Substances – Aka “E-Waste” or “Brown Goods” – Recycling Facilities and MSW
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix H Acronyms and Definitions
    Solid Waste Management Plan Appendix H Acronyms and Definitions APPENDIX H Solid Waste Management Plan Acronyms ACM Asbestos Containing Materials C&D Construction and Demolition CDL Construction, Demolition, Landclearing and Inert Waste CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations CY Cubic Yard Ecology Washington State Department of Ecology EDC (Spokane) Economic Development Council EPA (U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency EPP Environmentally Preferable Purchasing EPR Extended Producer Responsibility HDPE High-Density Polyethylene HHW Household Hazardous Waste HWMA (Washington) Hazardous Waste Management Act LDPE Low-Density Polyethylene LQG Large Quantity Generators MFS Minimum Functional Standards for Solid Waste Handling MQG Medium Quantity Generators MRF Material Recovery Facility MRW Moderate Risk Waste MRW Plan Moderate Risk Waste Management Plan MSW Municipal Solid Waste MTCA Model Toxics Control Act NESHAP National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants NOC Notice of Construction NPL National Priorities List NSLF Northside Landfill NWPSC Northwest Product Stewardship Council OFM Office of Financial Management (State of Washington) ONP Old Newsprint PAYT Pay As You Throw PETE Polyethylene Terephthalate PS Polystyrene PSI Product Stewardship Institute PVC Polyvinyl Chloride H - 1 Solid Waste Management Plan RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RCW Revised Code of Washington RDC Regional Disposal Company RPWRF Riverside Park Water Reclamation Facility
    [Show full text]
  • 01-74-19 Construction Waste Management
    California Polytechnic State University April 15, 2020 [Project Name – MJ00##] SECTION 01 74 19 - CONSTRUCTION WASTE MANAGEMENT PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 1 Specification Sections, apply to this Section. 1.2 SUMMARY A. Section includes requirements and procedures for ensuring optimal diversion of construction and demolition (C&D) waste materials generated by the Work from landfill disposal within the limits of the Construction Schedule and Contract Sum. 1. California State law (Public Resources Code sections 40000 et seq.) requires the California State University to develop source reduction, re-use, recycling, and composting programs to divert 75% of all solid waste from landfill disposal by 2020. Construction waste materials generated by the Work are targeted to achieve and maintain these diversion rates. 2. The Work of this Contract requires that a minimum of 75% by weight of the construction and demolition materials generated in the Work is diverted from landfill disposal through a combination of re-use and recycling activities. 3. For LEED® projects, requirements for submittal of LEED documentation in compliance with the Materials and Resources category, Construction and Demolition Waste Management credit. 4. Requirements for submittal of Contractor’s Construction Waste and Recycling Plan prior to the commencement of the Work. 5. Contractor’s quantitative reports for construction waste materials as a condition of approval of the third progress payment. 1.3 DEFINITIONS A. Class III Landfill: A landfill that accepts non-hazardous resources such as household, commercial, and industrial waste, resulting from construction, remodeling, repair, and demolition operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste to Energy in the Age of the Circular Economy Best Practice Handbook
    WASTE TO ENERGY IN THE AGE OF THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY BEST PRACTICE HANDBOOK NOVEMBER 2020 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK WASTE TO ENERGY IN THE AGE OF THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY BEST PRACTICE HANDBOOK NOVEMBER 2020 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2020 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 8632 4444; Fax +63 2 8636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2020. ISBN: 978-92-9262-480-4 (print); 978-92-9262-481-1 (electronic); 978-92-9262-482-8 (ebook) Publication Stock No. TIM200330-2 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/TIM200330-2 The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Slag from the Combustion of Solid Municipal Waste As a Partial Replacement of Cement in Mortar and Concrete
    materials Article Use of Slag from the Combustion of Solid Municipal Waste as A Partial Replacement of Cement in Mortar and Concrete Monika Czop 1,* and Beata Ła´zniewska-Piekarczyk 2 1 Department of Technologies and Installations for Waste Management, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, The Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 18, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland 2 Department of Building Engineering and Building Physics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, The Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 5, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +483-2237-2104 Received: 10 March 2020; Accepted: 30 March 2020; Published: 31 March 2020 Abstract: In Europe, the use of wastes in the cement and construction industry follows the assumptions of sustainability and the idea of circular economy. At present, it is observed that cement plants introduce wastes to the cement in the form of so-called mineral additives. The most often used mineral additives are: fly ash with silica fume, granulated blast furnace slag and silica fume. The use of mineral additives in the cement is related to the fact that the use of the most expensive component of cement—Portland cement clinker—is limited. The purpose of the article is a preliminary evaluation of the suitability of slag from the municipal solid waste incineration plant for its use as a replacement of cement. In this article, slag from the municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) replaces cement in the quantity of 30%, and presents the content of oxides and elements of slag from the MSWI. The obtained results are compared to the requirements that the crushed and granulated blast furnace slag need to meet to be suitable for use as an additive of type II to the concrete.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 29 Waste Ordinance
    PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 29 WASTE ORDINANCE Article I. § 29.1. Definitions Article II. § 29.2. Purpose Article III. § 29.3. Solid Waste Disposal Prohibited § 29.3.1. Solid Waste Disposal Approval Requirements § 29.3.2. Public Participation § 29.3.3. Acting upon Request for Approval § 29.3.4. Finding Required for Approval § 29.3.5. Record for Request Shall be Kept § 29.4. Approval Prohibited § 29.5. Revocation of Approval § 29.6. Noncompliance and Penalties § 29.7. Must Meet All Other Rules and Regulations § 29.8. Adjudication in Part § 29.9. Application CHAPTER 29 WASTE ORDINANCE Article I. SEC. 29.1. DEFINITIONS. 1. “Aquifer” means a geologic formation, group of formations, or a portion of a formation capable of yielding usable quantities of ground water to wells or springs. 2 “Ash” means waste material produced from an incineration process or any combustion. Ash types include: fly ash, bottom ash, and incinerator residue. 3. “Board” means the Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors. 4. “Bottom Ash” means ash or slag remaining in an incinerator or boiler unit after combustion. 5. “By Product Material” means a material that is not one of the primary products of a production process and is not solely or separately produced by the production process. By- product does not include a co-product that is produced for the general public's use and is ordinarily used in the form that is produced by the process. 6. “Commercial Chemical Product” means a chemical substance which is manufactured or formulated for commercial, agricultural or manufacturing use. This term includes a manufacturing chemical intermediate, off-specification chemical product, which, if it met specification, would have been a chemical product or intermediate.
    [Show full text]
  • ENERGY POTENTIAL of SOLID WASTE GENERATED at a TERTIARY INSTITUTION: ESTIMATIONS and CHALLENGES Adelere E
    ENERGY POTENTIAL OF SOLID WASTE GENERATED AT A TERTIARY INSTITUTION: ESTIMATIONS AND CHALLENGES Adelere E. Adeniran 1, AbdulGaniyu O. Adelopo 2,*, Adetinuke T. Aina 2, Afolasade T. Nubi 2 and Oluwatobi O. Apena 3 1 Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Lagos, Nigeria 2 Works & Physical Planning Department, University of Lagos, Nigeria 3 Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Lagos, Nigeria Article Info: ABSTRACT Received: Waste to energy (WtE) refers to any treatment process that creates energy in the 10 April 2019 Revised: form of electricity or heat from a waste source. This research reviews the potential 10 June 2019 uses of municipal solid waste generated at the University of Lagos, Akoka campus Accepted: as a sustainable energy source for the tertiary institution. Waste characterization 02 July 2019 study of the residual waste at the University’s sorting centre was conducted to de- Available online: termine the amount, composition and physical properties of the waste. A novel com- 01 August 2019 positional trending ratio (CTR) was used to evaluate the possible calorific variation Keywords: in samples using ASTMD3286-77 method. A validation of the experimental results Waste to energy was carried out using energy estimation model described by Smith and Scott (2005) Residual waste Calorific value and World Bank (1999). The major components of the residual waste were mainly Moisture content polythene materials (24%), inert (30%), organic waste (15%), and paper (15%). The Municipal solid waste average calorific value of 17.23 MJ/kg and moisture content of 41.3% could poten- tially generate 34, 787 kWh daily (about 48.32% of the 72,000 kWh energy demand of the University).
    [Show full text]