DOCSLIB.ORG

Statistical Transparency of Policing Report Per House Bill 2355 (2017) December 1, 2020 Revised December 8, 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Statistical Transparency of Policing Report Per House Bill 2355 (2017) December 1, 2020 Revised December 8, 2020 Statistical Transparency of Policing Report Per House Bill 2355 (2017) December 1, 2020 Revised December 8, 2020 Oregon Criminal Justice Commission Kenneth Sanchagrin Interim Executive Director The mission of the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission is to improve the legitimacy, efficiency, and effectiveness of state and local criminal justice systems. Authors and Contributors Kelly Officer Siobhan McAlister Michael Weinerman Courtney Rau Katherine Tallan Oregon Criminal Justice Commission Researchers Executive Summary House Bill 2355 (2017) mandated that by 2021, all Oregon law enforcement agencies must submit data regarding officer initiated traffic and pedestrian stops to the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission, so the Commission could analyze the submitted data for evidence of racial or ethnic disparities on an annual basis. To accomplish these ends, the Commission, along with the Oregon State Police and the Oregon Department of Public Safety Standards and Training (DPSST), created the Oregon Statistical Transparency of Policing (STOP) Program. This is the second annual report to the Oregon Legislature by the STOP Program examining data received pursuant to HB 2355. Since the passage of HB 2355, the STOP Program developed a standardized method for data collection as well as data collection software offered free of charge to all state law enforcement agencies. As of this time, the STOP Program has received at least one full year of data from the fifty-one largest law enforcement agencies in the state and analyses using those data are presented in Table E1. this report. In 2021, the STOP Program will report on Descriptive Statistics for all Oregon police departments and sheriffs’ offices, as Aggregate Year 2 Stop Data required by the Bill. Variable Tier 1 Tier 2 Table E1 reports descriptive statistics for the combined Traffic Stop 97.8% 95.6% Tier 1 and Tier 2 data contained in this report, which Race/Ethnicity represents stops made from July 1, 2019 through June Asian/PI 3.4% 2.5% 30, 2020. Across all agencies, the vast majority of the reported data were for traffic stops, although the share of Black 5.6% 3.1% traffic stops made by Tier 2 agencies was slightly lower Latinx 12.9% 11.3% than their larger counterparts. The majority of stops in Middle Eastern 1.4% 0.9% Oregon involved white individuals, which, in and of Native American 0.6% 0.4% itself, is not surprising given the demographic makeup of White 76.2% 81.9% Oregon as a whole. Overall, a little over one-quarter of Gender Tier 1 stops and one-fifth of Tier 2 stops involved Asian/ PI, Black, Latinx, Middle Eastern, or Native American Male 66.9% 64.1% Oregonians. Female 32.7% 35.7% Non-Binary 0.4% 0.1% Once the stop had been initiated, stopped individuals Age either were subject to no further action or merely given a warning in a little over 60 percent of stops. Other Under 21 10.3% 11.6% outcomes, including receiving a citation or being arrested, 21 – 29 24.0% 22.2% varied widely across agencies and are discussed in detail 30 – 39 25.1% 24.5% in the main body of the report. Finally, with regard to 40 – 49 17.1% 17.2% searches, approximately 2.7percent of all stops resulted in 50 and Older 23.5% 24.5% a search of some type. Stop Disposition To examine the traffic and pedestrian stop data acquired None 2.6% 7.5% by the STOP Program for racial/ethnic disparities, STOP Warning 57.1% 57.2% Program researchers utilized three methods. The first method, which is used to examine the initial decision to Citation 37.6% 32.9% stop an individual, was the Veil of Darkness Analysis Juvenile Summons 0.0% 0.0% (VOD). The VOD Analysis takes advantage of natural Arrest 2.7% 2.4% variations in daylight and darkness throughout the year Search Conducted 2.6% 2.8% and is based on the assumption that it is easier for an 1 Tier 1 & 2 Agencies • 2020 Executive Summary officer to discern race/ethnicity during the day when it is light versus the night when it is dark.Accordingly, the VOD Analysis compares stop rates for minority individuals to those for white individuals during the time windows surrounding sunrise and sunset. If, as demonstrated by the statistics that result from the VOD Analysis, minority individuals are more likely to be stopped in the daylight when race/ethnicity is easier to detect, then there would be evidence of a disparity. The second analytical method employed by the STOP Program is the Predicted Disposition Analysis, which examines matched groups using a statistical technique called propensity score analysis to explore whether disparities exist in stop outcomes (i.e., citations, searches, or arrests). If, after matching on all available data points in the stop data (e.g., time of day and day of the week the stop was made, reason for the stop, gender, age), minority individuals are either cited, searched, or arrested more often than similarly situated white individuals, then there would be evidence of a disparity. Finally, the STOP Program utilized the KPT Hit-Rate Analysis, which compares relative rates of successful searches (i.e., those resulting in the seizure of contraband) across racial/ethnic groups. It is based on the assumption that if search decisions by officers are made based on race/ethnicity neutral criteria, then success rates should be similar, if not identical, across different racial/ethnic categories. If, however, search success rates differ and the search success rates for minority individuals are significantly lower than those reported for white individuals, then there would be evidence of a disparity. To determine if disparities identified in this report warrant additional in-depth analysis and/or technical assistance from the Oregon Department of Public Safety Standards and Training (DPSST), STOP Program researchers reviewed the results of each of the three analyses conducted on the STOP Program data. For each individual analysis, an estimated disparity must meet the 95 percent confidence level for it to be statistically significant. Further, following best practices, for a law enforcement agency to be identified as one requiring further analysis as well as DPSST technical assistance, it must be identified as having a statistically significant disparity in two of the three analytical tests performed on the STOP data. Using the above mentioned analyses and thresholds, the STOP Program identified one agency that had statistically significant results across two of the tests performed on the data: the Clackamas County Sheriff’s Office. Specifically, results indicated that the Clackamas County Sheriff’s Office had disparities in the Predicted Disposition Analysis with regard to citation patterns involving Black and Latinx individuals and in the KPT Hit- Rate with regard to searches of Latinx individuals. Thus, it is recommended that the Clackamas County Sheriff’s Office be examined in greater detail by STOP Program researchers and receive technical assistance from DPSST. Tier 1 & 2 Agencies • 2020 2 Table of Contents 1. Background .................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. HB 2355 (2017) .................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Methodological Approach ............................................................................................................................ 3 2.1. Background ......................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2. Oregon STOP Program Analyses ........................................................................................................ 3 2.3. Analytical Sample ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.3.1. Data Elements ................................................................................................................................. 4 2.3.2.Sample ............................................................................................................................................... 6 2.4. Threshold for Statistical Significance ................................................................................................. 9 2.5. Limitations ........................................................................................................................................ 10 3. Characteristics of the Year 2 Stop Data ..................................................................................................... 11 3.1. General Characteristics .................................................................................................................... 11 3.2 COVID-19 Data Trends .................................................................................................................... 16 4. Veil of Darkness Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 21 4.1.Aggregate Veil of Darkness Analysis for All Tier 1 Agencies .......................................................... 21 4.2.Agency-level Veil of Darkness Analysis ........................................................................................... 23 4.3. Results for Stops in the Inter-Twilight Window .............................................................................. 24 5. Predicted Disposition Analysis .................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 181 Parr State Police
    OREGON /; Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 181 '"--. ii ._+ ,m, PARr State Police; Crime Reporting and Records; Police and Parole and Probation Standards and STATE POLIC~ 181.400 ~ ca nmmbe~ d smm poac~ 181.010 Defln/~o~s for ORS 181.010 to 181..580 lSI.O~O Deparmumt M State Police umblishod " lSI.410 181.060 Powers msd du.ttes of dmpmrtm~ and ibs mmbers ISL040 Depm,Umm to mstorw l,slm reim:tn8 m lst~lsw~ys and opm'mtou d vehic/a on lst~w~ power of ~ poamsu~ CRIMZ IUmPORTING persons not members of d~mrmmat " 181.511 181.080 State poUe~ m enforce laws and • tlmm of ageing-- . ISI.~1 C~.~ m ,.po~ dlm~o,imm of ,m,~,~ 181.0~ Bu~u of ~ td~ S~ Court Adm/m/mS~. to in- lSI.O~O ~tsto ~ buresu . ~ ~m~ s~ d m~ lSI.O~O Cm detoc¢ion htbor~o~ms .. m~ ISI.O00 Hmdqum,m~ and patrol s.m.~ons imm/m~Mm o~ cm.~n mma~ lSLI00 Ormmlza~ o+ work ot ~ 181.~a C'h,/m/md ldeB¢lff~as/on int~ avail- I~IAIO msu.ibu~ ol po~ tlu'oa,e~ts~ m 18L120 Slmsdard unihn~ lor m pollee CommLmdoa 18L130 Sm,'v/ee wlthoul ~ ms/tom Crtm/n~ ~ tnt~ avs/l- wm ,-~ by other penom sbk, m ~t d H.,,,---- ~ 181.140 C~jl~leamLak~7 o~ some ~. h/bitod " :.'" ..... " U ISLI60 suppuu and equipmea~ of m,poUee U 1SLAM ~H~smem o~ ~ fme ~ m ISL170 Dsm~e m. lea of property by ~ c~ record i~Morma~ms " member, d~ h'om pa~ U Peoeedu~ when into~ ~ by 18LI~ Sta~ Police Account -' :+" .
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Legislative Administration Committee Confidential Report
    OREGON LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE CONFIDENTIAL REPORT - Investigation of Complaint by Senators Alan Olsen and Dennis Linthicum against Senate President Peter Courtney and Speaker of the House Tina Kotek – Case 33 October 15, 2019 Prepared by: Sarah J. Ryan Jackson Lewis P.C. 200 SW Market St., Ste. 540 Portland, OR 97201 pg. 1 Complainants: Senators Alan Olsen and Dennis Linthicum Respondents: Senate President Peter Courtney and Speaker of the House Tina Kotek I. INTRODUCTION The Oregon Legislative Administration Committee (“LAC”) retained the law firm of Jackson Lewis P.C. (“Investigator”) to investigate complaints asserted by Senators Alan Olsen and Dennis Linthicum (“Complainants”).1 The complaints, including the written complaint by Senator Olsen, attached as Exhibit 1 (Complaint 33), were received by this office on July 8, 2019, and were processed as formal complaints under Legislative Branch Personnel Rule 27 (“Rule 27”).2 The complaint asserts that Senate President Peter Courtney and Speaker of the House Tina Kotek created a hostile workplace by not rebuking Representative Paul Evans, Senator James Manning, and Senator Ginny Burdick for their respective “terrorism” comments. Complaint 33 further alleges that President Courtney violated Rule 27 by purportedly sending law enforcement to arrest 11 Republican Senators who were absent from the Capitol (the “11 Absent Senators” or “11 Republican Senators”). Finally, Complaint 33 alleges that President Courtney and Speaker Kotek failed to take remedial action regarding the terrorism comments, resulting in closure of the state Capitol. This report contains factual findings based upon the information made available in the course of investigating this complaint. Based on my factual findings, this report makes conclusions regarding disputed events, except where otherwise noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Bill 593 Sponsored by Senator FREDERICK (Presession Filed.)
    81st OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2021 Regular Session Senate Bill 593 Sponsored by Senator FREDERICK (Presession filed.) SUMMARY The following summary is not prepared by the sponsors of the measure and is not a part of the body thereof subject to consideration by the Legislative Assembly. It is an editor’s brief statement of the essential features of the measure as introduced. Modifies provisions relating to police officers. 1 A BILL FOR AN ACT 2 Relating to police officers; creating new provisions; and amending ORS 181A.375 and 181A.440. 3 Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: 4 SECTION 1. ORS 181A.440 is amended to read: 5 181A.440. (1) The Department of Public Safety Standards and Training shall include in the 6 minimum training required for basic certification as a police officer or certified reserve officer 7 under ORS 181A.490: 8 [(1)] (a) The law, theory, policies and practices related to vehicle pursuit driving and, as facili- 9 ties and funding permit, vehicle pursuit training exercises; [and] 10 [(2)] (b) At least 24 hours of training in the recognition of mental illnesses utilizing a crisis 11 intervention training model, at least one hour of which must include training on the appropriate use 12 of the medical health database described in ORS 181A.285[.]; 13 (c) At least eight hours of diversity training; and 14 (d) Training on implicit bias. 15 (2) The department shall ensure that all police officers and certified reserve officers re- 16 ceive training in implicit bias each year. 17 SECTION 2.
    [Show full text]
  • State Police Enforcement SCR: 030-01-00-00000
    State Police Enforcement SCR: 030-01-00-00000 Program and Activities The OSP Fish and Wildlife Division is the single enforcement entity designated by law to protect fish and wildlife resources. The primary mission of the OSP Fish and Wildlife Division is to ensure compliance with the laws and regulations that protect and enhance the long-term health and equitable use of Oregon’s fish and wildlife resources and the habitats upon which they depend. In the 2019-21 Agency Request Budget, ODFW is proposing $28.66 million in its State Police Enforcement Appropriation. Across all revenue sources and budget appropriations, Expenditures by Program Area ODFW anticipates spending a total of $30.32 million on enforcement activities with OSP $28.66 Million Fish and Wildlife Division. These additional revenues include $697,697 in Other Fund through Recreational Shellfish Transfers, $106,704 in General Fund for Marine Reserves, State Police and $858,940 in Other Funds through Access and Habitat. 100% The main responsibility of the OSP Fish and Wildlife Division is protection of natural resources by enforcing fish, wildlife and commercial fishing laws. Members of this division also provide rural law enforcement services by enforcing traffic, criminal, boating, all-terrain vehicle, livestock and environmental protection laws, in addition to responding to emergency situations. The Superintendent of State Police and the Director of ODFW formed a partnership through Cooperative Enforcement Planning (CEP) agreements to ensure the OSP Fish and Wildlife Division’s enforcement efforts are directed toward ODFW’s priorities and management goals. Through planning and coordination, specific natural resource and other issues and concerns are identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon State Police
    Oregon State Police POLICY HR 218, 2004 (Federal) permits qualified sworn officers who retired in good standing to carry concealed handguns nationwide when also carrying a valid identification card. RELATED LAWS/REFERENCES Department Manual Chapters 402.2, 500.2, and 500.6, and 800.1; 18 U.S. Code §926B and §926C (HR 218, 2004); Oregon DPSST’s PQC. RULE 1. In order to meet the qualifications of HR 218, retired law enforcement officer enforcement officers must meet the following: A. Be retired in good standing, for reasons other than mental instability, from a public agency as a law enforcement officer. B. Before retirement, the retiree was authorized by law to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of, or the incarceration of any person for any violation of law and had statutory powers of arrest. 1. Before retirement, was regularly employed as a law enforcement officer for an aggregate of 15 years or more; or, 2. Retired from service as a law enforcement officer for a service connected disability after completing any applicable probationary period. C. The retiree has a non-forfeitable right to benefits under the retirement plan of the agency. D. During the most recent 12 month period, the retiree has met, at their own expense, the Oregon Department of Public Safety Standards and Training (DPSST) firearm qualification standards. For retirees residing outside the state of Oregon, at their own expense, must meet the firearm qualifications standards for their state of residence counterpart to DPSST. 1 E. Not be under the influence of alcohol or other intoxicating or hallucinatory drug or substance; and F.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon State Police Capitol Mall Area Command
    WORKPLACE SAFETY OREGON STATE POLICE CAPITOL MALL AREA COMMAND Oregon State Police 900 Court St Rm 60C Salem, Or 97301 (503) 986-1122 Ver. 02.17.16 Goals § Discuss Dealing with Angry or Hostile People § Discuss Building Physical Security § Discuss Types of Threats § Run/Hide/Fight Reality § Because of your position you will come into contact with difficult or hostile people § Prepare yourself mentally for the reality of your position § Not everyone will be happy with you or happy to meet you § Know your abilities and do not exceed them § Don’t put yourself in a situation where you will lose Dealing with an Angry or Hostile Person Dealing with an Angry or Hostile Person § Stay calm, tone of voice § Listen attentively § Maintain eye contact § Be courteous, give thank you’s § Be patient, speech pace § Keep the situation in your control • Set Acceptable Limits (Be respectful but direct) • Recognize you may not have the authority to “fix their problems” § Do Not be afraid to seek help Dealing with an Angry or Hostile Person § Yelling § § Profanity Tense muscles § § Arguing Red Face § § Crying Fidgeting § § Statements Short Attention Span § § Threats Pacing Communication § Throwing Things Around § §93% Non-Verbal Rapid or suppressed breathing § Glaring § 7% Verbal § Body posture Dealing with § Hand pointing/snapping People in § Avoiding eye contact Mental Crisis § Facial expressions Dealing with an Angry or Hostile Person Active Listening Skills Minimal Encouragers • “Okay” / “I see” / “Um hum” Paraphrasing • Repeating back what you heard Emotion
    [Show full text]
  • The Board of Trustees of Oregon State University
    The Board of Trustees of Oregon State University Regular Meeting of the Board of Trustees April 3, 2020 Telephonic Meeting MINUTES Trustees Present: Mike Bailey, Patty Bedient, Rani Borkar (chair), Julia Brim-Edwards, Darry Callahan, Michele Longo Eder, Lamar Hurd, Khawater Hussein, Paul Kelly, Julie Manning, Preston Pulliams, Ed Ray (ex officio), Kirk Schueler (vice chair), Stephanie Smith, and Mike Thorne University Staff Present: Charlene Alexander, Jennifer Almquist, Randy Bell, Sherm Bloomer, Susan Capalbo, Steve Clark, Jim Coakley, Debbie Colbert, Toni Doolen, Katie Fast, Ed Feser, Becca Gose, Mike Green, Dan Larson, Nell O’Malley, Paul Odenthal, Heidi Sann, Lauren Skousen, Patti Snopkowski, and Irem Tumer 1. Call to Order/Roll/Declaration of a Quorum Board Chair Rani Borkar called the meeting to order at 10:06 a.m., asked the board secretary to call the call, and noted a quorum. Borkar then made a land acknowledgement statement. 2. Written Reports Submitted to Committees Borkar introduced the written reports submitted to committees, noting that they were originally scheduled for discussion at the April committee meetings. She said discussion of these items would be scheduled at a future meeting at the discretion of the respective committee chairs. 3. Consent Agenda a. Minutes of the January 24, 2020 Board Meeting b. Minutes of the January 24, 2020 Executive Session c. 2021 and 2022 Board Calendars A motion was made and seconded to approve the items on the consent agenda. The motion carried. 4. Public Comments The following individuals provided public comments: Josiah Blaisdell: spoke about graduate student fees. Graham Trainor: spoke about the importance of supporting students, staff, and faculty during the pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Release OSSA Award
    KLAMATH COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE Sheriff Chris Kaber 3300 Vandenberg Rd Klamath Falls, OR 97603 (541) 883-5130 [email protected] Media Release Date: December 18, 2020 Re: Oregon State Sheriff’s Association Award – Award of Valor Contact: Brandon Fowler – PIO / Emergency Manager [email protected] On December 16, 2020 Klamath County Sheriff Chris Kaber & Klamath County Commissioner Derrick DeGroot presented Oregon State Sheriff’s Association Award of Valor to Klamath County Sheriff’s Office Deputies, Deputy Shasta Petersen, Deputy Maria Gray, Deputy Levi Justman, and Deputy Jimmy Leach. On Friday, April 10, 2020 at approximately 4:15 PM Klamath County 911 Communications District received a report of a disturbance in the 1700 block of Fargo Street. The reporting party advised that when the suspect arrived at a residence on Fargo Street he was intoxicated. The suspect was believed to have taken his 6-year-old child with him and he had a semi-automatic rifle in the front seat of the vehicle. Oregon State Police Sergeant Austin Hopson located the suspects vehicle as it traveled northbound on Crater Lake Parkway. A short time later officers began to pursue the suspect who attempted to elude them. While officers pursued, KCSO Deputy Levi Justman was able to position himself to deploy a spike strip. Shortly after, OSP Trooper Justin Henrick performed a Tactical Vehicle Intervention maneuver on the suspect vehicle and it stopped on Wocus Road. The suspect exited the vehicle and immediately began firing at officers on scene. The vehicles of Trooper Henrick, Deputy Petersen and Deputy Gray, along with OSP Trooper Kameron Gordon all sustained damage from gunfire.
    [Show full text]
  • Request for OSP Or OSFM Public Record
    REQUEST FOR OREGON STATE POLICE AND OREGON STATE FIRE MARSHAL RECORDS Provide all information available. If there are fees associated with your request you will receive a fee letter with information on how to submit payment. Mail, fax or email to: Oregon State Police Attn: Central Records Section 3565 Trelstad Ave. SE Salem, OR 97317 Fax: (503) 378-6300 Email: [email protected] Questions? Call (503) 378-3725 extension 44444 or email [email protected] Please select the option that best describes which requester type you represent: Private Citizen or Business Attorney Insurance Government Agency Law Enforcement Media Other Requester Information: (please enter your contact information) Name of Requester/Firm/Company: Telephone Number: Mailing Address: Contact Person: City: State/Zip: Contact Person e-mail address: (optional) Reason for Request: (required) Date Needed by: Requested Records: (please describe in detail the records you are requesting) Incident Information: (use this section to request records related to an incident OSP investigated or a citation issued by OSP) Case # or Citation #: (if known) Officer: (if known) Date of Incident: Time: AM PM Location of Incident/Street Address: City: County: Type of Incident/Crime/Description of events: Persons Involved (full and complete name known) – list additional known persons in comments section Name DOB Name DOB Vehicle Information: Make/Model/Year/Color/Style/etc. License Plate #: State: Comments: Please allow up to 30 days for your request to be processed. All reports requested are subject to release per state and federal public record statutes. Records may contain exempt and non-exempt materials and are subject to redaction.
    [Show full text]
  • AFSCME Oregon State Police Support Unit 19-21
    between DAS THE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES on behalf of OREGON STATE DEPARTMENT OF POLICE and AFSCME LOCAL 896 / COUNCIL 75, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY, AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES (AFL-CIO) TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE 1 – RECOGNITION……................................................................................................................................................ 4 ARTICLE 2 - ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS ......................................................................................................................... 5 ARTICLE 3 - MANAGEMENT'S RIGHTS .................................................................................................................................... 6 ARTICLE 4 - UNION RIGHTS, SECURITY, AND STEWARDS ................................................................................................. 7 ARTICLE 5 - EMPLOYEE RIGHTS ............................................................................................................................................. 12 ARTICLE 6 - EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION ...................................................... 12 ARTICLE 7 - PERSONNEL RECORDS ....................................................................................................................................... 13 ARTICLE 8 - FILLING of VACANCIES ...................................................................................................................................... 14 ARTICLE 9 - POSITION DESCRIPTIONS .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Deadly Physical Force Plan
    DEADLY PHYSICAL FORCE PLAN Deschutes County Use of Deadly Physical Force Planning Authority Preamble The use of deadly physical force by law enforcement personnel is a matter of critical concern both to the public and to the law enforcement community. The purpose of this Plan is not to set the standards for the use of such force, or to be a substitute for agency policy regarding use of force, but rather to provide a framework for a consistent response to an officer's use of deadly physical force that treats the law enforcement officer fairly, and promotes public confidence in the criminal justice system. Section 1: Administration (1) In the event that a member of the planning authority is unable to continue to serve, a replacement shall be appointed as provided in Section 2(1) of Senate Bill 111, Oregon Laws 2007. (2) There shall be six voting members of the Planning Authority. The approval of the Plan, elements or revisions thereof, shall be by majority vote. (3) The presence of 2/3 of the voting members shall be required in order to hold any vote. (4) Any meeting of a quorum of the voting members of the Planning Authority is subject to Oregon's open meeting law. Section 2: Applicability of the Plan (1) This plan shall be applicable, as set forth herein, to any use of deadly physical force, that results in a death of a person, by a police officer acting in the course of and in furtherance of his/her official duties, occurring within Deschutes County.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon State Police on February 25, 1931 and the House Approved It on March 1, EXPLOSIVE DISPOSAL
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. -----~ -~-- ~---- --~------~--------- OREGON This microfiche was produced from documents received for inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCtJRS cannot exercise control over the physical condition of the documents submitted, the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution chart on this frame may be used to evaluate tn(l document quality. STATE POLICE 2 8 I. 0 ~ 11/// . 11111 2.5 July 1980 June 1981 ~IJ,g i~,u 22• !lJ ~ w D4l II~ t ANNUAL REPORT 6 111111.25 111111.4 tllll1. ! i I • t MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART l NATIONAL BUREAU Of STANDARDS-1963-A \1 ,I ! 1 '< I I I i Microfilming procedures used to create this fiche comply with the standards set forth in 41CFR 101-11.504. II Points of view or opinions stated in this document are I those of the author(s) and do not represent the official .... "" I position or policies of the U. S. Department of Justice. ;' 1 I I I I . 71(29/82 National Institute of Justice Honorable Victor Atiyeh, Governor . ~ \ United States Department of Justicle John C. Williams, Superintendent Washington, D. C. 20531 , , . .; 0 ~ ........' ...... -.~'.-::=-.h:::~-=:t:::;~.~:::;\ ( '\ '\ ,'. ' Department ot State Police VICTOR ATIVEH 00\'ERN0fl PUBLIC SERVICE BUILDING, SALEM, OREGON 97310 .• r i The Honorable Victor Atiyeh Governor of Oregon U.S. Department of Justice 254 Capitol Building National Institute of Justice II" Salem, Oregon 97310 This document has been reproduced exactly .as receive? from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stat?d in this document are those of the authors and do.
    [Show full text]