Suicidal Ideation and Behavior

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Annals of Internal Medicine CLINICAL GUIDELINE Assessment and Management of Patients at Risk for Suicide: Synopsis of the 2019 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guidelines James Sall, PhD, FNP-BC; Lisa Brenner, PhD, ABPP; Amy M. Millikan Bell, MD, MPH; and Michael J. Colston, MD Description: In May 2019, the U.S. Department of Veterans Af- Recommendations: This synopsis, which includes 3 clinical fairs (VA) and U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) approved an practice algorithms, summarizes the key recommendations of update to the 2013 joint clinical practice guideline for assessing the guideline related to screening and evaluation, risk man- and managing patients who are at risk for suicide. This guideline agement and treatment, and other management methods. provides health care providers with a framework by which to screen Risk management and treatment recommendations address for, evaluate, treat, and manage the individual needs and prefer- both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic approaches for ences of VA and DoD patients who may be at risk for suicide. patients with suicidal ideation and behavior. Other manage- ment methods address lethal means safety (such as restricting Methods: In January 2018, the VA/DoD Evidence-Based Prac- access to firearms, poisons, and medications and installing tice Work Group convened to develop a joint VA/DoD guideline barriers to prevent jumping from lethal heights) and popula- including clinical stakeholders and conforming to the National tion health strategies. Academy of Medicine's tenets for trustworthy clinical practice guidelines. The guideline panel drafted key questions, systemat- ically searched and evaluated the literature through April 2018, created algorithms, and advanced 22 recommendations in ac- Ann Intern Med. 2019;171:343-353. doi:10.7326/M19-0687 Annals.org cordance with the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations As- For author affiliations, see end of text. sessment, Development and Evaluation) system. This article was published at Annals.org on 27 August 2019. uicide is a public health problem, with worsening GUIDELINE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS Strends in recent decades. Nationwide, suicide rates The recommendations were developed according increased 25% from 1999 to 2016 (1). All states report- to a process established by the Evidence-Based Practice ing to the National Violent Death Reporting System, ex- Work Group that adheres to the standards described for cept Nevada, indicated an increase in suicide rates dur- trustworthy guidelines published by the Institute of Med- ing this period, ranging from 6% to 58% (2). During that icine in 2011 (6–8). Members of the guideline project same time, the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) team completed conflict-of-interest disclosures for rela- active component suicide rate increased from 10.7 tionships in the previous 2 years. Web-based surveillance to 21.5 suicide-related deaths per 100 000 service (for example, by ProPublica) also was used to screen for members (3). potential conflicts of interest among project team mem- Suicide rates have been particularly high among bers. The Evidence-Based Practice Work Group selected army personnel, the service members who engaged in 3 guideline panel cochairs—1 from the VA and 2 from the DoD. The cochairs selected a multidisciplinary panel the most ground combat during the recent conflicts in of practicing clinician stakeholders, including primary Iraq and Afghanistan. In 2016, suicide occurred in 26.7, care physicians, psychologists, psychiatrists, pharma- 31.6, and 20.6 per 100 000 U.S. Army, Army National cists, nurse practitioners, social workers, and nurses, to Guard, and Army Reserve members, respectively. Ac- develop the guideline. cording to DoD Suicide Event Report data, 127 army The Evidence-Based Practice Work Group con- soldiers and 150 national guard or reserve members tracted with the Lewin Group, a third party with exper- took their own lives in 2016 (3). Among these suicides, tise in developing clinical practice guidelines, to facili- personally owned firearms were the most common tate meetings and to help draft key questions using the method used (58.9% of all suicide deaths) (4). PICOTS (population, intervention, comparator, out- Each day, 20 veterans die by suicide (4). Compared comes, timing of outcomes measurement, and setting) with age- and sex-matched civilian cohorts, veterans format. The guideline panel developed 12 key ques- have a 21% higher suicide rate (5). Differences also ex- ist between veterans who do and those who do not use Veterans Health Administration (VHA) services: An 8% See also: increase in suicides was observed among veterans who used VHA services versus 35.5% among those who did Related article ............................334 not. Of note, rates among female veterans who do not Editorial comments ....................372, 374 use VHA services have increased by 81.6%; however, Web-Only rates among female veterans who do use VHA services CME/MOC activity decreased by 2.6% (5). Annals.org Annals of Internal Medicine • Vol. 171 No. 5 • 3 September 2019 343 Downloaded from https://annals.org by VA Central Office of Acquisition Operations user on 09/03/2019 CLINICAL GUIDELINE Assessment and Management of Patients at Risk for Suicide Figure 1. Algorithm A: Identification of risk for suicide. 123 Person presents with Person identified to be at Person presents in context warning signs (may have high risk for suicide via of routine suicide risk suicidal ideation or recent predictive analytics screening self-directed violence) 4 Screen for current suicide risk: Ask the person direct questions about recent thoughts of suicide 6 5 Continue routine Are the screening No management of care and results positive?* presenting concerns Build protective factors Yes 8 If local procedures exist 7 for either completing Are safety concerns secondary suicide risk such that immediate No screening or conducting management is a comprehensive suicide required? risk evaluation, follow those procedures Yes 910Continue to Continue to Algorithm C, Algorithm B Step 19 (Figure 2) (Figure 3) * Continue to Step 7 if screening results are negative but additional evidence (e.g., collateral) suggests the need for continued screening or evaluation. tions to guide the evidence review. ECRI Institute per- tors as part of a comprehensive evaluation of suicide formed a systematic search of the peer-reviewed liter- risk. It also found support for cognitive behavioral ther- ature beginning with the end date of the literature apy (CBT)–based interventions focused on suicide pre- review from the previous version of the guideline— vention for patients with a recent history of self-directed November 2011—through April 2018. The search iden- violence, to reduce future incidents of self-directed vi- tified 70 studies relevant to the key questions, including olence. Despite a preponderance on the national sui- randomized trials, systematic reviews, and meta- cide prevention stage of strategies for community- analyses of fair or better quality. The search methods based intervention, evidence for the benefits of such and results are detailed in the full guideline (available interventions is lacking. The full guideline report pro- at www.healthquality.va.gov). All members of the vides complete recommendations, rationale, and sup- guideline panel participated in the evidence review porting evidence (www.healthquality.va.gov). and development of the recommendations in accor- dance with the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Screening and Evaluation Assessment, Development and Evaluation) method Within clinical settings, suicide prevention includes (9–11). screening for and evaluation of suicide risk. In screen- ing patients for such risk, the question often arises as to RECOMMENDATIONS whether screening itself might cause patients to think The guideline's goal is to reduce the incidence of about suicide, subsequently increasing their risk. Al- suicide through screening for and evaluation of suicidal though we found no studies that identified risks or risk, as well as to provide quality care to patients iden- harms associated with screening patients for suicide, tified as having an elevated risk. The guideline panel screening is not problem-free. Current screening tools developed 3 algorithms to highlight current best prac- tend to have an unacceptably high false-positive pre- tices (Figures 1 to 3) and formulated 22 evidence- diction rate (that is, many persons determined to be “at based recommendations organized into 3 categories risk” never have clinically significant suicidal thoughts (Appendix Table, available at Annals.org). In general, or behavior) and a low degree of accuracy for identify- the panel found strong support for assessing risk fac- ing true cases (that is, a substantial portion of persons 344 Annals of Internal Medicine • Vol. 171 No. 5 • 3 September 2019 Annals.org Downloaded from https://annals.org by VA Central Office of Acquisition Operations user on 09/03/2019 Assessment and Management of Patients at Risk for Suicide CLINICAL GUIDELINE who die by suicide are not identified by the screening analysis of ketamine trials, 55% of patients who re- tools) (15, 16). ceived ketamine reported no suicidal ideation after 24 Several studies identified in the search support the hours and 60% reported that they were no longer hav- use of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) item 9 as ing suicidal ideations at 7 days (20). a universal screening instrument to identify suicide risk Lithium may reduce the risk for suicide in patients (16, 17). Louzon and colleagues (16) evaluated 447 245 with unipolar depression or bipolar disorder. Several patients who received PHQ-9 assessments across VHA cohort studies and systematic reviews found that lith- care settings and found that higher levels of suicidal ium maintenance therapy was associated with fewer ideation, as identified by responses to item 9, were as- suicidal behaviors and deaths (12–29). Clozapine may sociated with an increased risk for death by suicide. reduce suicidal behaviors in patients with schizophre- Likewise, Simon and colleagues (17) examined the re- nia or schizoaffective disorder (30, 31).
Recommended publications
  • Bullying and Suicide, the 2X Development of Bullying Prevention More Likely to Attempt Suicide and Intervention Programs Is Vital (Hinduja & Patchin, 2010)
    FACT SHEET 3 BULLYING What is it? Bullying Bullying is related to negative psychological, emotional and and suicide behavioural outcomes. These outcomes can eventually make youth feel as though they can no longer cope (Wade & Beran, 2011). Bullying is linked to several precursors to thoughts of suicide (Hinduja & Patchin, 2010): • depression and hopelessness; • low self-esteem; • loneliness and isolation; • anger and frustration; Bullying is a conscious, willful, deliberate, • humiliation; repeated and hostile activity marked by • embarrassment; or • trauma. an imbalance of power, intent to harm and/or threat of aggression.” % (Alberta Human Services, 2015) 85 of bullying takes place in front of Types of bullying other people (Craig & Pepler, 1997). VERBAL BULLYING CYBERBULLYING When bullying is accompanied • sarcasm; • Using electronic communication by other risk factors, it often causes • threats; (e.g., internet, social media suicidal ideation (Hinduja & Patchin, • negative, insulting, or text messaging) to: 2010; Olson, 2012; Holt et al., 2015). Risk or humiliating comments; or » intimidate; factors for suicidal ideation include: • unwanted sexual comments. » put-down; • bullying; » spread rumours; • sexual abuse; SOCIAL BULLYING » make fun of someone; or • physical abuse; • spreading rumours or damaging » disseminate private or • drug abuse; or someone’s reputation; embarrassing information • depression. • excluding others from a group; or images of a person without • humiliating others with Both bullying victims and those their permission (Alberta public gestures or graffiti; or who perpetuate bullying are at a higher Human Services, 2015). • damaging someone’s friendships. risk for suicide. Kids who are involved as both victims and perpetrators of PHYSICAL BULLYING Cyber bullying victims are bullying are at the highest risk for • intentional physical aggression suicide (Holt et al, 2015, Suicide towards another person; Prevention Resource Center, n.d).
    [Show full text]
  • History of Suicide
    History of suicide In general, the pagan world, both Roman and Greek, had a relaxed attitude towards the concept of suicide, a practice that was only outlawed with the advent of the Christians, who condemned it at the Council of Arles in 452 as the work of the Devil. In the Middle Ages, the Church had drawn-out discussions on the edge where the search for martyrdom was suicidal, as in the case of some of the martyrs of Córdoba. Despite these disputes and occasional official rulings, Catholic doctrine was not entirely settled on the subject of suicide until the later 17th century. There are some precursors of later Christian hostility in ancient Greek thinkers. Pythagoras, for example, was against the act, though more on mathematical than moral grounds, believing that there was only a finite number of souls for use in the world, and that the sudden and unexpected departure of one upset a delicate balance. Aristotle also condemned suicide, though for quite different, far more practical reasons, in that it robbed the community of the services of one of its members. A reading of Phaedo suggests that Plato was also against the practice, inasmuch as he allows Socrates to defend the teachings of the Orphics, who believed that the human body was the property of the gods, and thus self-harm was a direct offense against divine law. The death of Seneca (1684), painting by Luca Giordano, depicting the suicide of Seneca the Younger in Ancient Rome. In Rome, suicide was never a general offense in law, though the whole approach to the question was essentially pragmatic.
    [Show full text]
  • Workplace Bullying and the Association with Suicidal Ideation/Thoughts and Behaviour: a Systematic Review
    Workplace bullying and the association with suicidal ideation/thoughts and behaviour: A systematic review Liana S Leach (PhD)1, Carmel Poyser (MPhil)2, Peter Butterworth (PhD)3,4 1 Centre for Research on Ageing, Health and Wellbeing, Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, 2601, ACT, Australia 2 National Institute for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, 2601, ACT, Australia 3 Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Victoria, Australia 4 Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Victoria, Australia Keywords: workplace bullying, mobbing, suicide, suicidal ideation Running title: Workplace bullying and suicide WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Research (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses) has established a prospective association between workplace bullying and increased risk of ill mental health. However, far less is known about the association between workplace bullying and suicidal thoughts and behaviour. This systematic review finds there is a lack of high quality epidemiological research identifying if and how workplace bullying uniquely contributes to increased risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviour – this is a substantial gap in the literature. Additional solid evidence identifying suicidal thoughts and behaviours as an outcome, would strengthen the case for prioritising workplace and public health policies and legislation against workplace bullying. *Corresponding Author: Liana Leach. Centre for Research on Ageing, Health and Wellbeing, Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, Tel: +61 2 61259725, Fax: +61 2 61250733, Email: [email protected] Funding and Acknowledgements: This work was supported by Australian Research Council (ARC) Future Fellowship #FT13101444, National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Early Career Fellowship #1035803.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mediating Role of Attachment and Mentalising in the Relationship Between Childhood Trauma, Self-Harm and Suicidality
    The mediating role of attachment and mentalising in the relationship between childhood trauma, self-harm and suicidality Maria Stagakia*, Tobias Nolteb,c, Janet Feigenbaumd, Brooks King-Casase, Terry Lohrenze, Peter Fonagyc,d, Personality and Mood Disorder Research Consortium, P. Read Montagueb,e,f,g a Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom b Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom c Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, United Kingdom d Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom e Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Virginia Tech, Department of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA f Department of Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA g Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA *Corresponding author: Present address: Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, Bloomsbury, WC1H 0AP, London, United Kingdom E-mail address: [email protected] Abstract Although the relationship between childhood trauma, self-harm and suicidality is well- established, less is known about the mediating mechanisms explaining it. Based on a developmental mentalisation-based theoretical framework, childhood adversity compromises mentalising ability and attachment security, which in turn increase vulnerability to later stressors in adulthood. This study aimed, thus, to investigate the role of attachment and mentalising as potential mechanisms in this relationship. In a cross-sectional design, 907 adults from clinical and community settings completed self-report questionnaires on retrospectively rated childhood trauma, and current attachment to the romantic partner, mentalising, self-harm, suicidal ideation and attempt.
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing Suicide: a Global Imperative
    PreventingPreventing suicidesuicide A globalglobal imperativeimperative PreventingPreventing suicidesuicide A globalglobal imperativeimperative WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Preventing suicide: a global imperative. 1.Suicide, Attempted. 2.Suicide - prevention and control. 3.Suicidal Ideation. 4.National Health Programs. I.World Health Organization. ISBN 978 92 4 156477 9 (NLM classification: HV 6545) © World Health Organization 2014 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization are The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ available on the WHO website (www.who.int) or can be purchased products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications –whether for sale or for non-commercial distribution– should be All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health addressed to WHO Press through the WHO website Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. (www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.html). However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility The designations employed and the presentation of the material in for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning arising from its use.
    [Show full text]
  • Passive Suicidal Ideation: a Clinically Relevant
    PASSIVE SUICIDAL IDEATION: A CLINICALLY RELEVANT RISK FACTOR FOR SUICIDE by CHRISTINE N. MORAN Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Arts Master’s Thesis Advisor: Dr. James C. Overholser Department of Psychological Sciences CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY August, 2013 2 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/dissertation of ______Christine N. Moran________________________________________________ candidate for the ______Master of Arts_______________ degree*. (signed)_______James C. Overholser, Ph.D._________________________________ (chair of committee) ________Norah Feeny, Ph.D._______________________________________ ________Julie Exline, Ph.D.________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ (date)_____6/7/2013_____________________________ *We also hereby certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary materials contained therein. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………… 6 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………….. 7 METHOD………………………………………………………………………………. 21 RESULTS……………………………………….……………………………………… 34 DISCUSSION…………………………………………………………………………... 47 TABLES………………………………………………………………………………... 60 APPENDICES………………………………………………………………….………. 71 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………………. 92 4 List of Tables Table 1: Demographic Variables among Non-Ideators,
    [Show full text]
  • The Right to Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia
    THE RIGHT TO ASSISTED SUICIDE AND EUTHANASIA NEIL M. GORSUCH* I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................ 600 I. THE COURTS ............................................................. 606 A. The Washington Due Process Litigation............ 606 1. The Trial Court ...................... 606 2. The Ninth Circuit Panel Decision ............. 608 3. The En Banc Court ...................................... 609 B. The New York Equal ProtectionLitigation ........ 611 1. The Trial Court ........................................... 611 2. The Second Circuit ..................................... 612 C. The Supreme Court............................................. 613 1. The Majority Opinion ................................. 614 2. The Concurrences ....................................... 616 D. The Consequences ofGlucksberg and Quill .... 619 III. ARGUMENTS FROM HISTORY ................................... 620 A. Which History?................................................... 620 B. The Ancients ....................................................... 623 C. Early Christian Thinkers .................................... 627 D. English Common Law ......................................... 630 E. ColonialAmerican Experience........................... 631 F. The Modern Consensus: Suicide ........................ 633 G. The Modern Consensus: Assisting Suicide and Euthanasia.......................................................... 636 IV. ARGUMENTS FROM FAIRNESS .................................. 641 A . Causation...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Guidelines: Responding to Grief, Trauma, and Distress After a Suicide
    Responding to Grief, Trauma, and Distress After a Suicide: U.S. National Guidelines Survivors of Suicide Loss Task Force April 2015 Blank page Responding to Grief, Trauma, and Distress After a Suicide: U.S. National Guidelines Table of Contents Front Matter Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................... i Task Force Co-Leads, Members .................................................................................................................. ii Reviewers .................................................................................................................................................... ii Preface ....................................................................................................................................................... iii National Guidelines Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Terminology: “Postvention” and “Loss Survivor” ....................................................................................... 4 Development and Purpose of the Guidelines ............................................................................................. 6 Audience of the Guidelines ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Study of Jail Suicide: 20 Years Later Foreword
    U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Corrections U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Corrections 320 First Street, NW Washington, DC 20534 Morris L. Thigpen Director Thomas J. Beauclair Deputy Director Virginia A. Hutchinson Chief, Jails Division Fran Zandi Program Manager National Institute of Corrections www.nicic.gov Lindsay M. Hayes, Project Director National Center on Institutions and Alternatives April 2010 NIC Accession Number 024308 This document was prepared under cooperative agreement number 06J47GJM0 from the National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Contents Foreword .......................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgments ..............................................................................................ix Executive Summary ............................................................................................xi Chapter 1. Introduction ...................................................................................... 1 Prior Jail Suicide Research .................................................................................... 2 A Word About Suicide Victim Profiles .................................................................... 3 Death in Custody Reporting Act of 2000...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 26 SUICIDE and HOMICIDE RISK MANAGEMENT: RATIONALE and SUGGESTIONS for the USE of UNIT WATCH in GARRISON and DEPLOYED SETTINGS
    Suicide and Homicide Risk Management Chapter 26 SUICIDE AND HOMICIDE RISK MANAGEMENT: RATIONALE AND SUGGESTIONS FOR THE USE OF UNIT WATCH IN GARRISON AND DEPLOYED SETTINGS † ‡ SAMUEL E. PAYNE, MD*; JEFFREY V. HILL, MD ; AND DAVID E. JOHNSON, MD INTRODUCTION RATIONALE FOR UNIT WATCH SUICIDE RISK ASSESSMENT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR UNIT WATCH PROCEDURES In Garrison Deployed Settings MEDICOLEGAL ISSUES SUMMARY *Colonel, Medical Corps, US Army; Chief, Outpatient Behavioral Health Services, Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Building 300, Room 13A-15, 300 South Hospital Road Fort Gordon, Georgia 30905 †Lieutenant Colonel, Medical Corps, US Army; Chief, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Landstuhl, Germany, CMR 402 Box 1356, APO AE, 09180; formerly, Chief, Outpatient Psychiatry, Landstuhl Regional Medical Center ‡Major, Medical Corps, US Army; Chief, Behavioral Health, US Army MEDDAC Bavaria, IMEU-SFT-DHR, ATTN: OMDC Schweinfurt, Unit 25850, APO AE 09033 An earlier version of this chapter was originally published as: Payne SE, Hill JV, Johnson DE. The use of unit watch or command interest profile in the management of suicide and homicide risk: rationale and guidelines for the military mental health professional. Mil Med. 2008;173:25–35. 423 Combat and Operational Behavioral Health INTRODUCTION Unit watch procedures are routinely used in both This chapter provides both a rationale and a set of garrison and operational settings as a tool to enhance suggestions for the use of unit watch based on funda- the safety of unit personnel when a soldier presents mental military psychiatric principles, review of the with suicidal or homicidal thoughts. To date, no spe- relevant literature, and anecdotal experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Risk & Protective Factors for Suicide
    Understanding Risk and Protective Factors for Suicide: A Primer for Preventing Suicide Risk and protective factors play a critical role in suicide prevention. For clinicians, identifying risk and protective factors provides critical information to assess and manage suicide risk in individuals. For communities and prevention programs, identifying risk and protective factors provides direction about what to change or promote. Many lists of risk factors are available throughout the field of suicide prevention. This paper provides a brief overview of the importance of risk and protective factors as they relate to suicide and offers guidance about how communities can best use them to decrease suicide risk. Contents: What are risk and protective factors? Risk factors are not warning signs. What are major risk and protective factors for suicide? Why are risk and protective factors important? Using risk and protective factors in the strategic planning process Key points about risk and protective factors for suicide prevention Additional resources Further reading References What are risk and protective factors? Risk factors are characteristics that make it more likely that individuals will consider, attempt, or die by suicide. Protective factors are characteristics that make it less likely that individuals will consider, attempt, or die by suicide. Risk and protective factors are found at various levels: individual (e.g., genetic predispositions, mental disorders, personality traits), family (e.g., cohesion, dysfunction), and community (e.g., availability of mental health services). They may be fixed (those things that cannot be changed, such as a family history of suicide) or modifiable (those things that can be changed, such as depression).
    [Show full text]
  • Suicide Risk Assessment Guide a Resource for Health Care Organizations
    Suicide Risk Assessment Guide A Resource for Health Care Organizations Disclaimer The Suicide Risk Assessment Guide: A Resource for Health Care Organizations, was prepared by the Ontario Hospital Association (OHA) in partnership with the Canadian Patient Safety Institute (CPSI) as a general guide to help health care organizations with understanding and standardizing the practice of high- quality suicide risk assessment. The research findings, tools and other materials in this resource guide are for general information only and should be utilized by each health care organization in a manner that is tailored to its circumstances. This resource reflects the interpretations and recommendations regarded as valid at the time of publication based on available research, and is not intended as, nor should it be construed as, clinical or professional advice or opinion. Health care organizations and individuals concerned about the applicability of the materials are advised to seek legal or professional counsel. Neither the OHA nor CPSI will be held responsible or liable for any harm, damage, or other losses resulting from reliance on, or the use or misuse of the general information contained in this resource guide. ISBN # 978-0-88621-335-0 Publication Number: #332 Suicide Risk Assessment Guide: A Resource for Health Care Organizations Sponsored By: The Ontario Hospital Association & The Canadian Patient Safety Institute Prepared By: Christopher Perlman, Ph.D. Research Project Lead Homewood Research Institute & Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Waterloo Regional Campus Eva Neufeld, M.A. (Ph.D. Candidate) Research Associate Homewood Research Institute & the Department of Health Studies and Gerontology, University of Waterloo Lynn Martin, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]