New Imperialism and the Legal Disentanglement of Dichotomies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Imperialism and the Legal Disentanglement of Dichotomies New Imperialism and the Legal Disentanglement of Dichotomies New Imperialism and the Legal Disentanglement of Dichotomies This thesis will, firstly, construct the factual and legal fundaments on which the (research of the) master thesis rests, by defining New Imperialism and analyzing its factual and legal implications in practice. Secondly, it analyzes the legal doctrine with regard to colonialism, more specifically, New Imperialism in the framework of the law of nations in the second half of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century. In this respect, a special focus will be laid on the relation between the colonizing power and the peoples on the newly discovered, conquered and occupied territories. And, thirdly, it (partly) deconstructs the leading and determining dichotomy in international law between the civilized and non-civilized world in the second half of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century. Addressing the strengths and weaknesses of several dichotomies, like naturalism v. positivism, civilization v. non-civilization and territorial sovereignty v. private property of land, will be the central issue throughout the thesis. Master thesis prepared for the „Research Master in Law‟ Supervisor: Prof. Dr. R.C.H. Lesaffer Written by Mieke van der Linden Education: Research Master in Law (two-years-variant) ANR: 223364 E-mail: w.a.m.vdrlinden@uvt.nl Date: 28th of June, 2010 1 New Imperialism and the Legal Disentanglement of Dichotomies Preface The underlying Master Thesis forms part of a broader PhD research project, which is still in a preliminary stage and bears the following title: Dominium and Imperium in the Treaty Practice of the Age of New Imperialism in the Heart of the African Continent (1870-1914): State Responsibility for Grave Historical Injustices. This Thesis is de first Chapter of the PhD Thesis and aims to analyze and construct the factual and theoretical framework of the broader research project. Over recent decades, the moral responsibility for the past actions of the European colonial powers in relation to their former colonies has been subject to a lively debate. The PhD project addresses the question of the State responsibility of former colonial powers under international law. Such a legal responsibility, or liability, would presuppose the commitment of wrongful actions against the international law that was applicable at the time of colonization. In the „Scramble for Africa‟ during the Age of New Imperialism (1870-1914), European States and non-State actors mainly used treaties and contracts to acquire sovereignty or private property – imperium and dominium – over indigenous lands and people. The research project raises the question whether Europeans did or did not systematically breach these treaties and contracts in the context of the acquisition of territory and the expansion of empire, mainly through extending sovereignty rights to the level of private property and the other way round. If this is the case, then this offers a legal basis to invoke the State responsibility of the former colonizing powers in contemporary international law. This question will be considered through three case studies involving three leading European powers: the colonization of Nigeria by Britain, of Equatorial Africa by France and of Cameroon by Germany. In the late 80s and 90s of the twentieth century, the „Durban debate‟ on (State) responsibility for grave historical injustices emerged. It was just then that it was recognized that colonialism caused a lot of distress to native populations and that it had to be prevented in the future. Additionally, regret was expressed for the lasting social and economic inequalities in many parts of the world nowadays, as a consequence of colonization. No word was dedicated to legal responsibility, or reparations. The discussion still persists with many unanswered questions. This research will touch upon these questions, will contribute to the „Durban debate‟ and will even (try to) solve the impasse on colonization and responsibility. The research project will examine and analyze the treaty-making practices between European colonial powers and African rulers to provide legal grounds (breach of contract) to held former colonial powers responsible for violation of the law during the colonization of Africa. Consequently, the main purpose of the research project is to proof that colonization in itself is an illegal act. 2 New Imperialism and the Legal Disentanglement of Dichotomies Further, an understanding and awareness of imperialism is insurmountable in order to overcome and prevent future ethnic and border conflicts in relation to title to territory. Imperialism, in the sense of a civilizing mission, imposes social, economic, legal and cultural ideas and customs on „uncivilized‟. Therefore, imperialism is not an issue of colonization, but is an ongoing movement of international law with many appearances. The underlying research in regard to colonialism is meant to gain understanding of imperialism in general, in order to anticipate on recent and future trends of imperialism. Additionally, it is especially important to analyse treaty negotiations and conclusions in the Age of New Imperialism and to enquire a deep understanding of the positions and stances of both African and European parties. In this, the emphasis has to lie on the mutuality of attitude understanding and equality. Up till now, research was focused on how members of the European international system or order regarded the subjects of the non-European world. However, the question of how the non-European peoples perceived, understood and explained Europeans at the end of the nineteenth century has to be posed. This research has to serve the enhancement of the effectiveness of treaty negotiations and conclusions between Western and African parties or States nowadays by considering „the African perspective‟. It has to be avoided that the same mistakes will be made as were made at the end of the nineteenth century. Mieke van der Linden Tilburg, 28 June 2010 3 New Imperialism and the Legal Disentanglement of Dichotomies Table of Contents Section Subject Page Number Introduction 5 1. Doctrinal perspectives on international law and New Imperialism 10 1.1 International law: civilized versus uncivilized 10 1.2 International law in the nineteenth century: naturalism versus 11 positivism? 1.3 European civilization versus non-European non-civilization 16 2. Title to territory: International law in relation to imperium and 22 dominium 2.1 Acquisition of territory 24 2.2 Cession and treaty making practice 34 2.3 Grotius‟ perspective on dominium and imperium 39 2.4 Imperium, dominium and New Imperialism connected 42 3. Conclusion and remarks for further research 47 Bibliography 54 Appendix 60 4 New Imperialism and the Legal Disentanglement of Dichotomies Introduction ‘There were dreams of El Dorado, of diamond mines and goldfields criss-crossing the Sahara. In Europe these were the drab years of the Great Depression and mounting stocks of unsold Manchester cotton, Lyons silk and Hamburg gin. Perhaps Africa was the answer to the merchants’ prayers. There might be new markets out there in this African garden of Eden, and tropical groves where the golden fruit could be plucked by willing brown hands.’1 (Thomas Pakenham) The world order of the nineteenth century offers a clear break with that of the foregoing centuries and is characterized by a radical and absolute dichotomy. A positivistic perspective on the international (legal) order takes over from the naturalistic view, which has been the mainstream perspective for several centuries. Moreover, this positivistic world order institutes a dichotomy, which can be described as European v. non- European; civilized v. non-civilized; center v. periphery; within the Family of Nations v. outside the Family of Nations; unity v. diversity; toleration mission v. civilization mission; reason v. nature; etc. It is in this divided world where colonialism revives resulting in the Age of New Imperialism (1870-1914). New Imperialism, also called the second European colonization wave, followed the first wave of the fifteenth to the early nineteenth centuries. Africa was one of the main battlefields of this second European colonization wave. In the „Scramble for Africa‟2, at the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century, several European powers collided in their ambitions to seize territory. The main actors in this competition were Great Britain, France and Germany, but also Belgium, Portugal, Italy and to a far lesser extent Spain were involved. The motives behind this colonization were multiple; they involved economic exploitation, protection of European national interests and imposing „superior‟ Western values. During the Age of New Imperialism, European powers added almost 9,000,000 square miles of African land, approximately 20 percent of the whole land mass of the world, to their overseas colonial empires.3 After the Conference of Berlin (1884-1885), the „Scramble for Africa‟ really came up to speed. The factual and practical events and consequences, which the partition of Africa implied, were enormous. Border lines were drawn, territory was divided and whole peoples were disturbed, split up and assimilated to European civilization. Each European power had its own means and strategies to realize its targets and objects on the territory of Africa. Nevertheless, in many cases, the arrival of the Europeans did not start off with conquest and subordination, but with all kinds of interactions with the indigenous people(s) and 1 T. Pakenham, The Scramble for Africa, London: Abacus, 2009, p. xxiv 2 The „Scramble for Africa‟ are the popular terms to describe the partition of Africa. Thomas Pakenham was the first author using these words in his book The Scramble for Africa (1991), T. Pakenham, The Scramble for Africa, London: Abacus, 2009. 3 For a chronological overview of colonization between 1870 and 1912, as composed by Thomas Pakenham in The Scramble for Africa, London: Abacus, 2009, see Appendix to this Master Thesis, p. 60. See also P.K.
Recommended publications
  • An Analysis of the Afar-Somali Conflict in Ethiopia and Djibouti
    Regional Dynamics of Inter-ethnic Conflicts in the Horn of Africa: An Analysis of the Afar-Somali Conflict in Ethiopia and Djibouti DISSERTATION ZUR ERLANGUNG DER GRADES DES DOKTORS DER PHILOSOPHIE DER UNIVERSTÄT HAMBURG VORGELEGT VON YASIN MOHAMMED YASIN from Assab, Ethiopia HAMBURG 2010 ii Regional Dynamics of Inter-ethnic Conflicts in the Horn of Africa: An Analysis of the Afar-Somali Conflict in Ethiopia and Djibouti by Yasin Mohammed Yasin Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree PHILOSOPHIAE DOCTOR (POLITICAL SCIENCE) in the FACULITY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES at the UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG Supervisors Prof. Dr. Cord Jakobeit Prof. Dr. Rainer Tetzlaff HAMBURG 15 December 2010 iii Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like to thank my doctoral fathers Prof. Dr. Cord Jakobeit and Prof. Dr. Rainer Tetzlaff for their critical comments and kindly encouragement that made it possible for me to complete this PhD project. Particularly, Prof. Jakobeit’s invaluable assistance whenever I needed and his academic follow-up enabled me to carry out the work successfully. I therefore ask Prof. Dr. Cord Jakobeit to accept my sincere thanks. I am also grateful to Prof. Dr. Klaus Mummenhoff and the association, Verein zur Förderung äthiopischer Schüler und Studenten e. V., Osnabruck , for the enthusiastic morale and financial support offered to me in my stay in Hamburg as well as during routine travels between Addis and Hamburg. I also owe much to Dr. Wolbert Smidt for his friendly and academic guidance throughout the research and writing of this dissertation. Special thanks are reserved to the Department of Social Sciences at the University of Hamburg and the German Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA) that provided me comfortable environment during my research work in Hamburg.
    [Show full text]
  • The Navigability Concept in the Civil and Common Law: Historical Development, Current Importance, and Some Doctrines That Don't Hold Water
    Florida State University Law Review Volume 3 Issue 4 Article 1 Fall 1975 The Navigability Concept in the Civil and Common Law: Historical Development, Current Importance, and Some Doctrines That Don't Hold Water Glenn J. MacGrady Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr Part of the Admiralty Commons, and the Water Law Commons Recommended Citation Glenn J. MacGrady, The Navigability Concept in the Civil and Common Law: Historical Development, Current Importance, and Some Doctrines That Don't Hold Water, 3 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 511 (1975) . https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol3/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact efarrell@law.fsu.edu. FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW VOLUME 3 FALL 1975 NUMBER 4 THE NAVIGABILITY CONCEPT IN THE CIVIL AND COMMON LAW: HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT, CURRENT IMPORTANCE, AND SOME DOCTRINES THAT DON'T HOLD WATER GLENN J. MACGRADY TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ---------------------------- . ...... ..... ......... 513 II. ROMAN LAW AND THE CIVIL LAW . ........... 515 A. Pre-Roman Legal Conceptions 515 B. Roman Law . .... .. ... 517 1. Rivers ------------------- 519 a. "Public" v. "Private" Rivers --- 519 b. Ownership of a River and Its Submerged Bed..--- 522 c. N avigable R ivers ..........................................- 528 2. Ownership of the Foreshore 530 C. Civil Law Countries: Spain and France--------- ------------- 534 1. Spanish Law----------- 536 2. French Law ----------------------------------------------------------------542 III. ENGLISH COMMON LAw ANTECEDENTS OF AMERICAN DOCTRINE -- --------------- 545 A.
    [Show full text]
  • 8.. Colonialism in the Horn of Africa
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) The state, the crisis of state institutions and refugee migration in the Horn of Africa : the cases of Ethiopia, Sudan and Somalia Degu, W.A. Publication date 2002 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Degu, W. A. (2002). The state, the crisis of state institutions and refugee migration in the Horn of Africa : the cases of Ethiopia, Sudan and Somalia. Thela Thesis. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:30 Sep 2021 8.. COLONIALISM IN THE HORN OF AFRICA 'Perhapss there is no other continent in the world where colonialism showed its face in suchh a cruel and brutal form as it did in Africa. Under colonialism the people of Africa sufferedd immensely.
    [Show full text]
  • DJIBOUTI: Implementing the 10- Point Plan of Action
    DJIBOUTI: Implementing the 10- Point Plan of Action Djibouti has always been a favoured destination for migrants and refugees from countries in the region, notably Ethiopia, Eritrea, and Somalia. The migrant population is estimated to represent 20 per cent of the total population of the country. The Djiboutian population shares strong ethnic links (Somali, Afar) with Somaliland, Ethiopia, Eritrea, and Yemen, which explains the migratory movements between these countries. Djibouti has been described as an oasis of peace in a stormy desert, in a sub region rife with insecurity: the ongoing threat of a border war between Eritrean and Ethiopia, the continuing battle between supporters of the Government in Somalia and the supporters of the opposition Islamists, and the recent turmoil in Kenya. The economic and political stability in the country has attracted thousands of impoverished people in search of better economic prospects. The situation took a new twist over the past two to three years with the increased use of Djibouti as a transit country by smugglers and traffickers en route to the Arab Gulf States and to Europe. The country’s proximity to more prosperous countries in the Arab Gulf and the hope to continue their journey to more developed western countries has therefore equally worked as a pull factor for migrants. During the first months of 2008, a large number of migrants and refugees chose the route by boat to Yemen via Djibouti as an alternative to exposure to reckless smugglers in Bossaso, Somalia. Since January 2008, 2,213 new arrivals from South/Central Somalia have been registered by UNHCR, the peak being in February with 1,100 persons (Jan: 251; Mar: 862).
    [Show full text]
  • Treaty of Paris Imperial Age
    Treaty Of Paris Imperial Age Determinable and prepunctual Shayne oxidises: which Aldis is boughten enough? Self-opened Rick faradised nobly. Free-hearted Conroy still centrifuging: lento and wimpish Merle enrols quite compositely but Indianises her planarians uncooperatively. A bastard and the horse is insulate the 19th century BC Louvre Paris. Treaty of Paris Definition Date & Terms HISTORY. Treaty of Paris 173 US Department cannot State Archive. Treaty of Paris created at the conclusion of the Napoleonic Wars79 Like. The adjacent of Wuhale from 19 between Italy and Ethiopia contained the. AP US History Exam Period 3 Notes 1754-100 Kaplan. The imperial government which imperialism? The treaty of imperialism in keeping with our citizens were particularly those whom they would seem to? Frayer model of imperialism in constantinople, seen as well, to each group in many layers, sent former spanish. For Churchill nothing could match his handwriting as wartime prime minister he later wrote. Commissioner had been in paris saw as imperialism is a treaty of age for. More construction more boys were becoming involved the senior age of Hmong recruits that. The collapse as an alliance with formerly unknown to have. And row in 16 at what age of 17 Berryman moved from Kentucky to Washington DC. Contracting parties or distinction between paris needed peace. Hmong Timeline Minnesota Historical Society. To the Ohio Country moving journey from the French and British imperial rivalries south. Suffragists in an Imperial Age US Expansion and or Woman. Spain of paris: muslim identity was meant to both faced increasing abuse his right or having.
    [Show full text]
  • Spanish American War 8/6/11 1:19 PM Page Iii
    DM - Spanish American War 8/6/11 1:19 PM Page iii Defining Moments The spanish- American War Kevin Hillstrom and Laurie Collier Hillstrom 155 W. Congress, Suite 200 Detroit, MI 48226 DM - Spanish American War 8/6/11 1:19 PM Page v Table of Contents Preface . .ix How to Use This Book . .xiii Research Topics for Defining Moments: The Spanish-American War . .xv NARRATIVE OVERVIEW Prologue . .3 Chapter One: American Expansion in the 1800s . .7 Chapter Two: Spain and Its Colonies . .23 Chapter Three: The Call to Arms: Remember the Maine! . .35 Chapter Four: A “Splendid Little War” in Cuba . .53 Chapter Five: The War in the Philippines . .71 Chapter Six: American Imperialism in the New Century . .85 Chapter Seven: Legacy of the Spanish-American War . .103 BIOGRAPHIES Emilio Aguinaldo (1869-1964) . .121 Filipino Rebel Leader and Politician George Dewey (1837-1917) . .124 American Naval Commander of U.S. forces in the Pacific during the Spanish-American War William Randolph Hearst (1863-1951) . .128 American Newspaper Publisher of the New York Journal and Leading Architect of “Yellow Journalism” v DM - Spanish American War 8/6/11 1:19 PM Page vi Defining Moments: The Spanish-American War Queen Lili’uokalani (1838-1917) . .132 Last Monarch of the Kingdom of Hawaii Antonio Maceo (1845-1896) . .136 Cuban Military Leader in the Ten Years’ War and the Spanish-American War José Martí (1853-1895) . .140 Cuban Revolutionary Leader and Writer William McKinley (1843-1901) . .143 President of the United States during the Spanish-American War Theodore Roosevelt (1858-1919) . .147 Hero of the Spanish-American War and President of the United States, 1901-1909 Valeriano Weyler (1838-1930) .
    [Show full text]
  • Suppose It to Be So
    188 L A W GLOSSARY. by a fine of twenty-five asses, or pounds of brass. But if the injury was more atrocious, as, for instance, if any one deprived another of the use of a limb, (si membrum rapsit, i. e. ruperit,) he was punished by retaliation, \talione,) if the person injured would not accept of any other satisfaction. If he only dislocated or broke a bone, he paid three hundred asses, if the suffer er was a freeman ; and one hundred and fifty, if a slave. Gell. xx. If any one slandered another by defamatory verses, (si quis aliquem publice diffamas- set, eique adversus bonos mores convicium fecissit,�i. e. "if any one defamed another, or cast reproach on him contrary to good manners or morality ;" " affronted him (vel carmen famosum in eum condidisset)�i. e. made an in famous libel upon him," he was beaten with a club, vid. Hor. Sat. ii. which alludes to the law for this species of libel. But these laws gradually fell into disuse, Gell. xx. ; and by the edicts of the Prcetor, an action was granted on account of ail personal injuries and af fronts only, for a fine, which was proportioned according to the dignity of the person, and the nature of the injury. This, however, being found in sufficient to check licentiousness and insolence, Sulla made a new law con cerning injuries, by which, not only a civil action, but also a criminal prose cution, was appointed for certain offences, with the punishment of exile, or working in the mines.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476)
    Impact of Empire 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd i 5-4-2007 8:35:52 Impact of Empire Editorial Board of the series Impact of Empire (= Management Team of the Network Impact of Empire) Lukas de Blois, Angelos Chaniotis Ségolène Demougin, Olivier Hekster, Gerda de Kleijn Luuk de Ligt, Elio Lo Cascio, Michael Peachin John Rich, and Christian Witschel Executive Secretariat of the Series and the Network Lukas de Blois, Olivier Hekster Gerda de Kleijn and John Rich Radboud University of Nijmegen, Erasmusplein 1, P.O. Box 9103, 6500 HD Nijmegen, The Netherlands E-mail addresses: O.Hekster@let.ru.nl and G.deKleijn@let.ru.nl Academic Board of the International Network Impact of Empire geza alföldy – stéphane benoist – anthony birley christer bruun – john drinkwater – werner eck – peter funke andrea giardina – johannes hahn – fik meijer – onno van nijf marie-thérèse raepsaet-charlier – john richardson bert van der spek – richard talbert – willem zwalve VOLUME 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd ii 5-4-2007 8:35:52 The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476) Economic, Social, Political, Religious and Cultural Aspects Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Roman Empire, 200 B.C. – A.D. 476) Capri, March 29 – April 2, 2005 Edited by Lukas de Blois & Elio Lo Cascio With the Aid of Olivier Hekster & Gerda de Kleijn LEIDEN • BOSTON 2007 This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Distortions in the Historical Record Concerning Ager Publicus, Leges Agrariae, and the Gracchi Maria Therese Jeffrey Xavier University, Cincinnati, OH
    Xavier University Exhibit Honors Bachelor of Arts Undergraduate 2011-3 Distortions in the Historical Record Concerning Ager Publicus, Leges Agrariae, and the Gracchi Maria Therese Jeffrey Xavier University, Cincinnati, OH Follow this and additional works at: http://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/hab Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Ancient Philosophy Commons, Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons, Classical Literature and Philology Commons, and the Other Classics Commons Recommended Citation Jeffrey, Maria Therese, "Distortions in the Historical Record Concerning Ager Publicus, Leges Agrariae, and the Gracchi" (2011). Honors Bachelor of Arts. 22. http://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/hab/22 This Capstone/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate at Exhibit. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Bachelor of Arts by an authorized administrator of Exhibit. For more information, please contact exhibit@xavier.edu. Distortions in the Historical Record Concerning Ager Publicus, Leges Agrariae, and the Gracchi Maria Jeffrey Introduction: Scholarship on the Gracchi is largely based on the accounts of Plutarch and Appian, historians who were far removed temporally from the Gracchi themselves. It is not known from which sources Plutarch and Appian derive their accounts, which presents problems for the modern historian aiming to determine historical fact. The ancient sources do not equip the modern historian to make many definitive claims about the Gracchan agrarian reform, much less about the motives of the Gracchi themselves. Looking to tales of earlier agrarian reform through other literary sources as well as exploring the types of land in question and the nature of the agrarian crisis through secondary sources also yields ambiguous results.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Does Canada Have So Many Unresolved Maritime Boundary Disputes? –– Pourquoi Le Canada A-T-Il Autant De Différends Non Résolus Concernant Ses Frontières Maritimes?
    Why Does Canada Have So Many Unresolved Maritime Boundary Disputes? –– Pourquoi le Canada a-t-il autant de différends non résolus concernant ses frontières maritimes? michael byers and andreas Østhagen Abstract Résumé Canada has five unresolved maritime Le Canada a cinq frontières maritimes qui boundaries. This might seem like a high n’ont pas encore été délimitées. Ce nom- number, given that Canada has only three bre peut paraitre élevé étant donné que le neighbours: the United States, Denmark Canada n’a que trois voisins: les États-Unis, (Greenland), and France (St. Pierre and le Danemark (Groënland) et la France (St. Miquelon). This article explores why Pierre et Miquelon). Cet article cherche à Canada has so many unresolved maritime découvrir pourquoi le Canada a tant de boundaries. It does so through a compar- frontières maritimes irrésolues. Pour ce ison with Norway, which has settled all of faire, l’article se penche sur le cas de la its maritime boundaries, most notably in Norvège, qui a réussi à délimiter toutes ses the Barents Sea with Russia. This compar- frontières maritimes, y compris dans la mer ison illuminates some of the factors that de Barents avec la Russie. Cette comparai- motivate or impede maritime boundary son met en relief certains des facteurs qui negotiations. It turns out that the status favorisent ou entravent les négociations of each maritime boundary can only be pour la résolution de différends maritimes explained on the basis of its own unique frontaliers. Il s’avère que le statut des fron- geographic, historic, political, and legal tières maritimes ne peut s’expliquer qu’en context.
    [Show full text]
  • Life of Imperialism: Thailand, Territory and State Transformation
    Life of Imperialism: Thailand, territory and state transformation Abstract: The paper argues that in territorial disputes before international courts between states that were formerly under colonial rule and semicolonialism, respectively, international courts favour the former. I study two cases – semicolonial Siam in Cheek v Siam arbitration (1897) and postcolonial Thailand in the Temple of Preah Vihear case (1962) – in their historical context to prove this. The critique of formalism here operates on two levels. First, in actual disputes the production of colonial stationary – for example, maps, photographs, and communiqué as demonstrable proofs of evidence – benefits states formerly under colonial rule. Second, in the Temple of Preah Vihear case, the ICJ pits, as it were, the French colonial history in Cambodia against Siamese semicolonial past. Arguably, the Cheek v Siam episode demonstrates nineteenth century Siam’s successful attempts to deploy politico- legal strategy to remain politically independent. By contrast, the ICJ in the Temple case defeats Siamese conceptions of shared sovereignty to confirm the continuing hegemony of modern geography and colonial cartography. The Cheek and Temple cases, respectively, among other untribunalized arm- twisting episodes typify Siam’s tryst with both semicolonial and postcolonial international law. Siam offers both epistemological lessons on history, past, and knowledge production and the possibility of prefiguring postcolonial Asian imperialism. Table of Content I. Introduction II. Of historians and Lawyers III. Indochina, Britain and France in the nineteenth century A. The British Burma-Siam Boundary issue: 1824-1846 B. Siam, Cambodia and France: 1821-1909 IV. Unequal Treaties and semicolonial Siam A. Situating Cheek v Siam Arbitration (1897) B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geography and Economic Development of British Central Africa: Discussion Author(S): Lewis Beaumont, Harry Johnston, Wilson Fox, J
    The Geography and Economic Development of British Central Africa: Discussion Author(s): Lewis Beaumont, Harry Johnston, Wilson Fox, J. H. West Sheane, Clement Hill and Alfred Sharpe Source: The Geographical Journal, Vol. 39, No. 1 (Jan., 1912), pp. 17-22 Published by: geographicalj Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1778323 Accessed: 17-04-2016 17:44 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers), Wiley are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Geographical Journal This content downloaded from 134.129.182.74 on Sun, 17 Apr 2016 17:44:26 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms BRITISH CENTRAL AFRICA?DISCITSSION. 17 purely philanthropic in these matters?we do not enter upon such enter- prises with the sole view of benefiting the African: we have our own purposes to serve, but they must be served in such a way as to operate to the advantage of all. I have little hesitation in replying that our occupation has had the best results, and from all points of view. So far as our own interests are concerned we have opened up a promising part of Tropical .Africa.
    [Show full text]