DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploring the Construction of the Sexually Dimorphic Body

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1-1-2011 Gendering the Body: Exploring the Construction of the Sexually Dimorphic Body Sarah Kaye Lewis Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Lewis, Sarah Kaye, "Gendering the Body: Exploring the Construction of the Sexually Dimorphic Body" (2011). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 152. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.152 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Gendering the Body: Exploring the Construction of the Sexually Dimorphic Body by Sarah Kaye Lewis A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Sociology Thesis Committee: Grant Farr, Chair Ann Mussey Martha Balshem Portland State University ©2011 ABSTRACT Gender is a pervasive and regulating social institution that is operationalized in mainstream Western culture as a natural extension of the ontological difference perceived to exist between the binarily sexed bodies of male and female. Feminist theory has widely established, however, that gender is done - i.e., gender is not a naturally occurring phenomenon, but is an ongoing construction engaged and replicated by individual actors and which, while compulsory, is nevertheless optional. Within this canon is a small number of feminist theorists, notably Judith Lorber, Judith Bulter, and Nancy Tuana, who argue that the constructive manifestations of gender performativity (that is, do ing of gender) are not limited to the social sphere. They argue the role of gender in the production of the material body, asserting that doing gender has a constructive role in physical embodiment: what we do influences, and in fact creates, what our bodies are . This study engages the feminist theory on the production of the body through a qualitative exploration of the lived experience of gendered bodily change, as described in the first-hand narratives of trans-identified individuals. I predict that the analysis of the narratives in the sample will show that in comparison to cisgender individuals, trans individuals possess a heightened awareness of the performative nature of gender, and that trans individuals consciously engage performativity in order to conform to the normative expectations associated with the desired gender role. I further predict that trans S. K. Lewis - Gendering the Body / Abstract i individuals experience sexually dimorphic bodily change to be a direct result of changes to their gender identity. The interview analysis findings provide mixed support for the first hypothesis, demonstrating that while trans individuals in the sample do demonstrate a heightened awareness of the ways in which gender is performed, the respondents' insights came largely from their experiences in their compulsorily cisgender, pre-transition lives, rather than their current gender embodiments. The concept of performativity and its perceived implication of artificiality clashed with the respondents' sense of their gendered actions as an expression of an authentic self, and my analysis thus addresses performativity as a necessarily polemic concept located between the subjectivity of the individual narratives and the theoretical position that gender is done . The findings provide a substantial level of support for the second hypothesis that trans individuals understand experienced bodily change to be a direct result of changes in gender identity. This study's exploration of trans experiences of lived bodily change contributes a narrative perspective to the ongoing discussion in feminist theory which surrounds the role of gender in the production of the material body. S. K. Lewis - Gendering the Body / Abstract ii for Max S. K. Lewis - Gendering the Body / Dedication iii Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................ i Dedication .......................................................................................................... ................iii List of Tables ......................................................................................................................v Glossary .............................................................................................................................vi Chapter One Introduction ........................................................................................................................1 Chapter Two Part I: Theoretical Review ................................................................................................12 Part II: Literature Review .................................................................................................26 Chapter Three Methodology .....................................................................................................................56 Chapter Four Findings ............................................................................................................................74 Chapter Five Part I: Discussion ............................................................................................................118 Part II: Conclusion ..........................................................................................................137 Reference List .................................................................................................................144 Appendices A. Interview Guide ..............................................................................................149 B. Call For Participants .......................................................................................154 C. Intermediary Script and Cover Letter .............................................................155 D. Questionnaire .................................................................................................157 E. Cover Letter of Informed Consent .................................................................161 S. K. Lewis - Gendering the Body / Table of Contents iv List of Tables Table 1: Selected Characteristics of the Sample ..............................................................78 S. K. Lewis - Gendering the Body / List of Tables v GLOSSARY Cisgender: This term refers to individuals whose sex category is cohesively aligned with their gender identity (i.e., male/man, female/woman). Cis is a Latin prefix meaning “on this side” or “on the same side.” In their article "Doing Gender, Doing Heteronormativity: 'Gender Normals,' Transgender People, and the Social Maintenance of Heterosexuality," Kristen Schilt and Laurel Westbrook defined cisgender as a label for "individuals who have a match between the gender they were assigned at birth, their bodies, and their personal identity" (2009: 440). The term "cisgender" is also used to discussed the larger concept: just as "gender" can refer to both individual identity and a general social phenomenon, cisgender is at times used to collectively discuss those who consider their sex and gender to be cohesive. Transgender : This term refers to individuals whose gender identity is not cohesive with sex category as assessed at birth. They do not identify with the gender traditionally ascribed to their sex category, and instead identify with the gender. In the theoretical context, the term "transgender" is used to refer to the larger phenomenon of gender transgression, specifically as it relates to moving from one socially-accepted gender role to the other. Sex : This term refers to biological sex, which can include consideration of anatomical genitalia, chromosomal karyotype, and/or endrocrinological/ hormonal typing. Culturally, "sex" is understood to be limited to an exclusive male-female dichotomy. However, this narrow conception neglects the true spectrum of human diversity and the prevalence (and, indeed, the existence of) intersexuality. Though presumed to be a naturally occurring "fact," sex is also a phenomenon subject to social interaction. As Candace West and Don Zimmerman (1987) write, "Sex is a determination made through the application of socially agreed upon biological criteria for classifying persons as females or males" (127). Herein, "sex" will be used to refer both to biological sex and to socially- assigned sex categories in cases of intersexuality and/or "ambiguous" genitalia. S. K. Lewis - Gendering the Body / Glossary vi Gender : Gender is a social phenomenon not empirically related to sex. To again quote West and Zimmerman (1987), gender "is the activity of managing situated conduct in light of normative conceptions of attitudes and activities appropriate for one's sex category" (127). Culturally, gender is understood to be limited to an exclusive male-female dichotomy, though many other gender identities exist. Herein, "gender" will be used to refer to the full spectrum of gender identities, including but not limited to male, female, trans, transgender, transsexual, androgyny, and genderqueer. Sexual Dimorphism : In this study, the term sexual dimorphism refers not to genital binary (i.e., male/female), but rather to the non-genital physical differential that is observed between the sexes of the same species. S.
Recommended publications
  • Fall 2007  Volume Xxiiii No

    Fall 2007  Volume Xxiiii No

    FALL 2007 VOLUME XXIIII NO. 3 NNeettwwoorrkknewsnews The Newsletter of Sociologists for Women in Society SSWWSS MMeeeettiinnggss iinn NNYYCC AAuugguusstt 1111--1133 22000077 FFrroomm tthhee BBiigg UUnneeaassyy ttoo tthhee BBiigg AAppppllee By: Manisha Desai The meeting in New York was organized to continue the SWS President focus of the winter meetings on Solidarities Across Borders. I was really pleased with the attendance at our sessions. rom New Orleans to New York was both a dramatic There was standing room only at Doing Gender: 20 Years shift and yet a continuation of the story of the Later which honored Candace West and Don Zimmerman's contemporaryFF crisis of the US state, in particular the increas- classic article in Gender and Society. Similarly the panel, ing privatization and corruption of the state’s security and Straight Up No Chaser: Challenges Women of Color Face in reconstruction roles. While the attack in New York, six the Academy, and Evelyn Nakano Glenn's SWS Feminist years ago, marked the beginning of this crisis, New Orleans Lecture, Yearning for Whiteness: The New Global represented the depth of this crisis. The SWS meeting in Marketing of Skin Whitening Products, were well attended New Orleans showcased how every day men and women in and led to animated discussions. I also took advantage of our New Orleans were building solidarities across borders to location in New York City and organized jointly, with ASA rebuild even as the state had abdicated its responsibilities. and Women Make Movies, a day-long women's film The US model of privatization of state roles was also evident festival.
  • SWS Network News

    SWS Network News

    Network News I N S I D E T H I S ISSUE: VOLUME XXIX, ISSUE 4 DECEMBER 2012 Looking 3 Ahead to 2013 Upcoming Winter Meeting in Tamaya! Thanks for an 3 Amazing When Denise Segura persuaded some dates and times to keep in politics of gender and sexualities in Year! me to run for SWS President, I did mind. contemporary African con- Gender Equal- 5 not wholly appreciate the joys of texts. Our plenary speaker, Marga- working with a feminist group. ity: Utopian & We will have an opening recep- ret Abraham, will be talking about We went through some major Realistic changes this year; Pat has de- tion, 5-7 p.m., on Thursday, the social justice.. And, yes, Cecelia 7th of February, 2013. The or- Ridgeway, ASA President, will be From the Ex- 6 scribed these in her column. It ganized sessions, plenaries, and joining us for the Sunday plenary. ecutive Office has been a truly amazing opportu- nity to work on SWS matters this business meetings are scheduled THANKS to Kate Berheide for mak- year. Election 8 for Friday, Saturday, Sunday; the ing this possible. I have been enjoying the privilege meeting ends at 11.45 on Sunday Results of being an SWS-er at every turn (Feb 10th). this year. Each time I asked peo- “Critique Me” 9 ple for help, they stepped up and took on responsibilities cheerfully, View of Hyatt Local chapters 10 in the midst of ever-increasing Regency Tamaya work loads, stress and anxiety Resort & Spa about elections, challenges in the Award calls 12 midst of Sandy.
  • KATHLEEN GERSON Professor of Sociology

    KATHLEEN GERSON Professor of Sociology

    KATHLEEN GERSON Professor of Sociology Collegiate Professor of Arts and Science New York University May, 2020 CONTACT INFORMATION [email protected] http://sociology.fas.nyu.edu/object/kathleengerson www.KathleenGerson.com @KathleenGerson https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathleen_Gerson EDUCATION Ph.D. Department of Sociology, University of California at Berkeley, 1981 M.A. Department of Sociology, University of California at Berkeley, 1974 B.A. Stanford University, 1969 (Magna Cum Laude, Phi Beta Kappa) ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2010-present Collegiate Professor of Arts and Science, New York University 1995-present Professor of Sociology, New York University 2000-2003 Chair, Department of Sociology, New York University 1990-1996 Director of Undergraduate Studies in Sociology, New York University 1988-94 Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, New York University 1980-87 Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, New York University 1979 Instructor, Program on Urban Studies, Stanford University 1975-77 Research Specialist, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, U.C. Berkeley Katheen Gerson Page 2 ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS (cont.) 1972-76 Research Assistant, Institute of Industrial Relations 1972-1976 Survey Research Center, U.C. Berkeley VISITING POSITIONS 2011-2012 Fellow, Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University 1995 Visiting Research Scholar, Center for the Study of Status Passages and Risks in the Life Course, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany 1987-88 Visiting Scholar, Russell Sage Foundation,
  • Toward a World Beyond Gender: a Utopian Vision Barbara J. Risman

    Toward a World Beyond Gender: a Utopian Vision Barbara J. Risman

    Toward a World Beyond Gender: A Utopian Vision Barbara J. Risman University of Illinois at Chicago Judith Lorber Brooklyn College and Graduate Center, City University of New York Jessica Holden Sherwood University of Rhode Island Prepared for the 2012 American Sociological Society Meetings. We thank Erik Olin Wright for inviting our participation in a presidential plenary about utopian visions for society. We thank Rachel Allison, Amy Brainer, Pallavi Banerjee and Georgiann Davis for their comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. 1 2 Any utopian essay, even one based on social science expertise, is necessarily and explicitly a value-laden normative project. As invited participants of the American Sociological Association‘s 2012 ―Envisioning Real Utopias‖ project, we fully embrace this kind of ―emancipatory social science‖ (Wright 2010). As avowedly feminist scholars, we are part of an intellectual community birthed by a social movement. We have always stayed close to our feminist roots, with an explicit goal to do work that helps transform the world toward one in which gender inequality does not exist (Lorber 1994, 2005, Risman 1998, 2004). Following Wright‘s distinction between social and political justice (Wright 2010), feminists of all stripes would probably agree that whatever one‘s sexual identity and gender practices, everyone should have the (social) freedom to choose their own paths as separate persons and the (political) freedom to join collectively with others to affect their broader community. We will proceed presuming
  • Revisioning Gender. Myra Marx Ferree, Judith Lorber and Beth B. Hess (Eds.)

    Revisioning Gender. Myra Marx Ferree, Judith Lorber and Beth B. Hess (Eds.)

    The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare Volume 27 Issue 1 March - Special Issue on the Changing Article 16 American Mosaic March 2000 Revisioning Gender. Myra Marx Ferree, Judith Lorber and Beth B. Hess (Eds.). Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw Part of the Gender and Sexuality Commons, and the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation (2000) "Revisioning Gender. Myra Marx Ferree, Judith Lorber and Beth B. Hess (Eds.).," The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare: Vol. 27 : Iss. 1 , Article 16. Available at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol27/iss1/16 This Book Note is brought to you by the Western Michigan University School of Social Work. For more information, please contact wmu- [email protected]. 190 Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare in a significant reversal in current thinking about economic de- velopment and equality. Nevertheless, Bowles and Gintis may have initiated a debate that could have far reaching repercussions. Their clear explication of how a grossly unequal society harms the well-being of ordinary people may be persuasive in fostering an egalitarian agenda that is electorally palatable. Myra Marx Ferree, Judith Lorber and Beth B. Hess (Eds.), Revi- sioning Gender. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1999. $72.00 hardcover, $34.95 papercover. Feminist scholarship in sociology has expanded rapidly over the last twenty or so years. This expansion has moved steadily along a trajectory of shifting gender analysis from the margins of sociological interest to its very center. Today feminist scholars insist that gender be viewed as a central element in all sociological research. Since gender is a central element of social life, the gender lens must be applied to all sociological questions.
  • Toward Gender Equality: the Promise of Paradoxes of Gender to Promote Structural Change

    Toward Gender Equality: the Promise of Paradoxes of Gender to Promote Structural Change

    William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice Volume 1 (1994) Issue 1 William & Mary Journal of Women and Article 6 the Law October 1994 Toward Gender Equality: The Promise of Paradoxes of Gender to Promote Structural Change Andrea Giampetro-Meyer Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl Part of the Jurisprudence Commons, and the Law and Gender Commons Repository Citation Andrea Giampetro-Meyer, Toward Gender Equality: The Promise of Paradoxes of Gender to Promote Structural Change, 1 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 131 (1994), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl/vol1/iss1/6 Copyright c 1994 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl BOOK REVIEW TOWARD GENDER EQUALITY: THE PROMISE OF PARADOXES OF GENDER TO PROMOTE STRUCTURAL CHANGE PARADOXES OF GENDER, by Judith Lorber,* New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1994. Reviewed by Andrea Giampetro-Meyer** and Amy Fiordalisi*** One of the joys of reading is that studying the words of thoughtful, knowledgeable writers helps readers rethink the way they look at the world. Those of us who read, reason, and practice in the field of law sometimes need to experience the jolt one can feel by reading literature outside the field of law. Judith Lorber presents ideas in Paradoxes of Gender' that trigger a significant jolt. In this book, sociologist Lorber urges the reader to see the world in a new way. In particular, she asks the reader to view gender as a social institution.
  • Introducing Women's and Gender Studies: a Collection of Teaching

    Introducing Women's and Gender Studies: a Collection of Teaching

    Introducing Women’s and Gender Studies: A Teaching Resources Collection 1 Introducing Women’s and Gender Studies: A Collection of Teaching Resources Edited by Elizabeth M. Curtis Fall 2007 Introducing Women’s and Gender Studies: A Teaching Resources Collection 2 Copyright National Women's Studies Association 2007 Introducing Women’s and Gender Studies: A Teaching Resources Collection 3 Table of Contents Introduction……………………..………………………………………………………..6 Lessons for Pre-K-12 Students……………………………...…………………….9 “I am the Hero of My Life Story” Art Project Kesa Kivel………………………………………………………….……..10 Undergraduate Introductory Women’s and Gender Studies Courses…….…15 Lecture Courses Introduction to Women’s Studies Jennifer Cognard-Black………………………………………………………….……..16 Introduction to Women’s Studies Maria Bevacqua……………………………………………………………………………23 Introduction to Women’s Studies Vivian May……………………………………………………………………………………34 Introduction to Women’s Studies Jeanette E. Riley……………………………………………………………………………...47 Perspectives on Women’s Studies Ann Burnett……………………………………………………………………………..55 Seminar Courses Introduction to Women’s Studies Lynda McBride………………………..62 Introduction to Women’s Studies Jocelyn Stitt…………………………….75 Introduction to Women’s Studies Srimati Basu……………………………………………………………...…………………86 Introduction to Women’s Studies Susanne Beechey……………………………………...…………………………………..92 Introduction to Women’s Studies Risa C. Whitson……………………105 Women: Images and Ideas Angela J. LaGrotteria…………………………………………………………………………118 The Dynamics of Race, Sex, and Class Rama Lohani Chase…………………………………………………………………………128
  • What Is Gender? Author(S): Ivy Kennelly, Sabine N

    What Is Gender? Author(S): Ivy Kennelly, Sabine N

    What Is Gender? Author(s): Ivy Kennelly, Sabine N. Merz, Judith Lorber Source: American Sociological Review, Vol. 66, No. 4 (Aug., 2001), pp. 598-605 Published by: American Sociological Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3088925 Accessed: 26/03/2009 15:05 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=asa. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Sociological Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Sociological Review. http://www.jstor.org 598 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW Sex of Things: Gender and Consumption in Commenton Udry, ASR, June 2000 Historical Perspective, edited by V.
  • Believing Is Seeing: Biology As Ideology Author(S): Judith Lorber Source: Gender and Society, Vol

    Believing Is Seeing: Biology As Ideology Author(S): Judith Lorber Source: Gender and Society, Vol

    Believing is Seeing: Biology as Ideology Author(s): Judith Lorber Source: Gender and Society, Vol. 7, No. 4 (Dec., 1993), pp. 568-581 Published by: Sage Publications, Inc. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/189514 Accessed: 10/01/2009 17:24 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=sage. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Sage Publications, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Gender and Society. http://www.jstor.org 1992 Cheryl Miller Lecture BELIEVING IS SEEING: Biology as Ideology JUDITH LORBER BrooklynCollege and GraduateSchool City Universityof New York Westernideology takes biology as the cause, and behaviorand social statusesas the effects, and then proceeds to construct biological dichotomies to justify the "naturalness"of gendered behavior and gendered social statuses.
  • 1 SOCIOLOGY 6019H1F GENDER RELATIONS Gender Differences, Divisions and Inequalities Instructor

    1 SOCIOLOGY 6019H1F GENDER RELATIONS Gender Differences, Divisions and Inequalities Instructor

    SOCIOLOGY 6019H1F GENDER RELATIONS Gender Differences, Divisions and Inequalities Instructor: Bonnie Fox Time: Tues.,Thurs. 1:00-3:00 Office: Room 382, 725 Spadina Ave. Location: rm. 240 Office hours: Tues. 12:30 & 3:00-4:00 Email address: [email protected] Phone number: 416 978-4213 Summer 2018 Sociology of gender is an immense field, featuring very fluid boundaries with other disciplines. It has developed in leaps and bounds over the five decades since the start of the Women’s Liberation Movement. Scholars’ initial concern was understanding women’s unequal social position – conceptualized in terms of “sex roles” in sociology or power/oppression due to either “patriarchy” or patriarchal capitalism by feminist theorists. While concern about inequality persists, the issues, questions, methods and theoretical approaches have multiplied over time, and the understanding of gender inequality has deepened. As a concept, gender has many meanings. But it is now conceptualized less as a characteristic of individuals and more in terms of historically specific and socially constructed social relations, social practices, subject positions, systems of meaning, or a structural division (and even as a social structure itself). Moreover, the influence of postmodernism/post-structuralism has meant that materialist perspectives have become less popular and cultural analyses more popular; and post-structural critiques have moved scholars’ attention from social structure (or social organization) to individual agency. To an extent, attention has shifted from questions about the nature and sources of gender inequality to questions about meaning and identity. At the same time, questions about inequality have also become more complicated, as gender is increasingly understood to be entangled with social class and race, as well as sexuality.
  • Chinese People's Perceptions of Gender Inequality

    Chinese People's Perceptions of Gender Inequality

    Lund University Department of Political Science Bachelor’s Thesis in Development Studies Tutor: Daniel Gustafsson Chinese People’s Perceptions of Gender Inequality Rui Hao Abstract Purpose – The aim of the study is to examine young urban Chinese people’s perceptions of gender inequality, including their awareness, beliefs, values, understanding, and their perceptions of the reality. The main fields investigated by the research are: family (childcare, housework, financial responsibility and women’s unpaid work); work (sex segregation in the workplace, low-paid work, women’s service occupations and gender wage gap,); political participation and representation; legal rights and measures; reproductive and sexual autonomy; gender awareness; and understanding of feminism. Theory – Individualistic, cultural, and social explanations of gender inequality constitute the theoretical framework for the analysis. The construction of the questionnaire/interview questions is based on feminist theories including liberal feminism, Marxist feminism, and socialist feminism. Method – A mixed method approach is employed for the research. Both quantitative and qualitative data are obtained in the field by means of questionnaire and interview. The sample is made up of 118 young Chinese people living in the city of Harbin, including 49 men and 69 women. Limitations – Areas such as women’s health, sexual violence and abuse, and education are not included in the study. The sample has certain bias due to contextual constraints, limiting the validity for generalization.
  • Sociology Mainstreaming Gender

    Sociology Mainstreaming Gender

    Sociology ­ Mainstreaming Gender Sociology of Gender courses most often start by exploring the social ‘constructedness’ of sex and gender. They look at the way in which sex and gender are social phenomena that change over time and vary across cultures. Feminists have challenged the idea that sex and gender are fixed biological realities and argue that gender is a major organizing aspect of society. Gender arises out of our everyday interactions and is shaped by larger institutions such as education, work, and the family. Gender inequalities revealed through social patterns are examined as well as the way in which a hierarchical gender system is both reproduced and challenged through the link between social structure and interpersonal experiences. Other topics include: race and class, the body, sexuality, education, work, and transgenderism. Wharton, Amy S. 2005. The Sociology of Gender: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Topic ­ Conceptualizing Gender Scholars have conceptualized gender as a social construction, as a performance and as a social institution. Social Construction Feminists have argued that gender is socially constructed and reproduced in everyday life. We learn gender from early childhood. Brennan, Teresa. 1989. Between Feminism and Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge. Burke, Caroline, Naomi Schor, and Margaret Whitford (eds.). 1994. Engaging With Irigaray: Feminist Philosophy and Modern European Thought. New York: Columbia University Press. Chodorow, Nancy. 1999. The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley: University of California Press. Connell, Raewyn. 2005. Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press. Chapter 1. Connell, Raewyn. 2009. Gender: In World Perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press. Chapters 1 and 2.