Taiwan Policy Under the Biden Administration Biden and the Future of US-Taiwan Relations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Taiwan Policy Under the Biden Administration Biden and the Future of US-Taiwan Relations Global Taiwan Brief Vol. 5, Issue 22 Global Taiwan Brief Vol 5. Issue1 22 Taiwan Policy Under the Biden Administration Russell Hsiao Biden and the Future of US-Taiwan Relations: A Shared Vision for a Democratic Future J. Michael Cole Taiwanese Perspectives on the Next US Administration’s Taiwan and Cross-Strait Policies Hsin-Huang Michael Hsiao and Alan H. Yang Next President’s Priorities for the Partnership with Taiwan Shirley Kan Taiwan Policy under Biden: The First Six Months, The First Year, and Beyond Michael Mazza The Future of US-Taiwan Economic Relations: Lessons from the Past Riley Walters Taiwan Policy Under the Biden Administration The Global Taiwan Brief is a By: Russell Hsiao bi-weekly publication released every other Wednesday and pro- Russell Hsiao is the executive director of the Global Taiwan Institute (GTI) and editor-in-chief of the vides insight into the latest news on Taiwan. Global Taiwan Brief. All the major US media networks now forecast that former Vice President Joseph Biden— Editor-in-Chief Russell Hsiao the presidential nominee of the Democratic Party—has won the 2020 presidential election Staff Editor and will become the 46th president of the United States. In a full-blown dash out of the Katherine Schultz gate in preparation for assuming the highest political office, President-elect Biden has al- Copy Editor ready taken the step of forming his agency review teams, including for defense and foreign Marshall Reid policy. As the president-elect and his transition team take a fine-tooth comb to review the The views and opinions expressed agencies—as well as policies of the current administration—one area they will certainly in these articles are those of the look at is Taiwan policy. In part because of the high-profile and openly confrontational tack authors and do not necessarily re- taken by the Trump administration in its approach to China policy, Taiwan has been in the flect the official policy or position headlines almost constantly over recent years. In turn, this has created a misperception of the Global Taiwan Institute. that adjustments in US policy towards Taiwan were driven primarily by policy towards To view web sources cited in the China. It is of course the prerogative of any incoming administration to review the policy published papers (underlined and practices of its predecessor. In this special issue of the Global Taiwan Brief, we asked in printed text), visit https:// several of our research fellows and advisors to weigh in on what they think will be—and globaltaiwan.org/2020/11/vol-5- what they think should be—the priorities for the incoming Biden administration. issue-22/. But before diving into the expert assessments of what we might have to look forward to Global Taiwan Institute over the next four years under the Biden-Harris White House, it is worthwhile to take a 1836 Jefferson Place NW, look at how we got to where we are today. Washington DC 20036 [email protected] Despite expectations—and perhaps overstated concerns—of a fundamental change in US Taiwan policy, four years of the Trump administration did not alter the legal framework To subscribe, visit https://global- taiwan.org/subscribe/. and policies that form the basis of US policy towards Taiwan—which remains firmly root- ed in the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) and the Six Assurances. The US “One-China Policy” © 2020 · Global Taiwan Institute remains intact—although it has arguably been stretched. Indeed, its elasticity has always Global Taiwan Brief Vol. 5, Issue 22 2 been a durable feature of the US-Taiwan-China rela- 1. A phone call between the President-elect Trump tionship and a function of Beijing’s actions. and Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). As President Ronald Reagan made clear in a 1982 2. Regularizing the arms sales process to Taiwan. memo that has been recently declassified, the US 3. Routinizing and publicizing naval transits through commitment to Taiwan’s self-defense is “conditioned the Taiwan Strait. absolutely upon the continued commitment of China to the peaceful solution of the Taiwan-PRC differenc- 4. Resuming cabinet-level visits and interactions by es.” As China’s actions have grown increasingly aggres- senior officials such as the US national security ad- sive vis-à-vis Taiwan and the world, especially in recent viser and the secretary-general of Taiwan’s Nation- years, the United States has had to take a hard look at al Security Council. updating its policies and practices to better reflect ob- jective reality. Justifying the adjustment in the admin- 5. President Trump’s signing of two landmark Tai- istration’s approach to Taiwan policy over the past four wan-related bills. years, Assistant Secretary of State for East Asia and 6. Permitting the president of Taiwan high-profile Pacific Affairs David Stillwell noted in a major Taiwan visit-like transits through the United States. policy speech in late August 2020: 7. Declassification of internal policy documents “What we are doing […] is making some import- that guide US policy towards Taiwan, such as Pres- ant updates to our engagement with Taiwan ident Reagan’s memos on the Six Assurances and to better reflect these policies and respond to arms sales to Taiwan. changing circumstances. The adjustments are significant, but still well within the boundaries of 8. High-level public support for expanding Taiwan’s our “One-China Policy.” […] We feel compelled to international space, as demonstrated by the cam- make these adjustments for two reasons. First, paign to include the island in the WHO. because of the increasing threat posed by Bei- 9. Elevating the Global Cooperation and Training jing to peace and stability in the region, which Framework (GCTF) to include new official partners is a vital interest of the United States. […] The and hosting the forum in different regions of the second reason we have been focusing on our world. engagement with Taiwan is simply to reflect the growing and deepening ties of friendship, trade, 10. Launching the New Economic Prosperity Dia- and productivity between the United States and logue. Taiwan.” These actions all objectively reflect the upward trajec- Also instructive of just how views of Taiwan are chang- tory in US-Taiwan relations during the Trump adminis- ing in the United States, it is noteworthy that the de tration. While agency certainly matters for how policy facto US ambassador to Taiwan and long-time diplo- is conducted, there are structural components of the mat, AIT Director Brent Christensen, pointed out at US-Taiwan relationships that have a bearing on how GTI’s 2020 annual symposium: “I believe the US-Tai- policy will be conducted. This is especially true in the wan partnership underwent a subtle but powerful case of Taiwan policy given the centrality of the TRA—a shift this year. This is the first time in my memory that domestic law that establishes the legal framework for influential voices […] began to discuss the US-Taiwan the unofficial relations with Taiwan. That US-Taiwan partnership more on its own merits than solely in the relations have withstood and even thrived under pre- US-China context.” So what are some of the visible carious conditions since the change in diplomatic rec- manifestations of these adjustments in the Trump ad- ognition—despite expectations of the contrary—is a ministration’s upgraded engagement with Taiwan and strong testament to the robust, flexible legal and policy the content of US Taiwan policy in general? framework provided by the TRA and the Six Assuranc- es. These measures mandate reciprocal American and Taiwanese obligations and commitments that have Global Taiwan Brief Vol. 5, Issue 22 3 helped to preserve peace and stability in the Taiwan marred the Trump administration’s broader policies, Strait for the past 40 years. Taiwan policy has been one of its clear bright spots. As such, it behooves the incoming administration to con- While any potential political transition injects a degree tinue to expand on these policies, working to demon- of uncertainty into policy, it is important to remember strate that the US approach to Taipei and Beijing is bi- that the pro-Taiwan legislation signed into law over the partisan and enduring, and that the US commitment past four years—including the Taiwan Travel Act, TAI- to Taiwan’s democracy does not change with elections. PEI Act, Asia Reassurance Initiative Act, and the various National Defense Authorization Acts—was passed with An old idiom applies: Don’t throw the baby out with overwhelming bipartisan support in the US Congress, the bathwater. some even with unanimous consent. These accom- The main point: As the incoming Biden administration plishments are remarkable political feats for a deeply reviews the policies and practices of the departing ad- divided Congress and should provide reassurance that ministration, one area it will certainly look at is Taiwan Taiwan policy continues to enjoy robust bipartisan sup- policy. It behooves the incoming administration to port in the United States. Moreover, that the president demonstrate that the US approach to Taipei and Bei- signed these bills into law—giving them the full politi- jing is bipartisan and enduring by continuing the pos- cal force of the US government—is a rare and powerful itive elements of the Trump administration’s Taiwan demonstration of unity in US policy. policy. Perhaps more importantly, these pieces of legislation *** help to broaden and deepen the foundation of US-Tai- wan relations by reinforcing key commitments in the Biden and the Future of US-Taiwan Rela- Taiwan Relations Act and Six Assurances and even ex- panding them in certain ways. More specifically, they tions: A Shared Vision for a Democratic extend the policy role and oversight function exerted Future by Congress as a co-equal branch of government, en- suring that American interests and values as defined By: J.
Recommended publications
  • Response to Pacnet #8, “Taiwan Travel Act: Bad Idea? ”
    NUMBER 8R PACIFIC FORUM CSIS · HONOLULU, HI FEB. 1, 2018 RESPONSE TO PACNET #8, “TAIWAN TRAVEL ACT: BAD IDEA? ” BY DENNIS V. HICKEY, JOSEPH BOSCO, LARRY OSBORN, AND ZHIQUN ZHU Once again, Hickey asserts that since the NDAA did not Dennis V. Hickey ([email protected]) is “mandate” the port calls or even “require the Pentagon to distinguished professor and director of the Graduate study the matter,” it was a futile gesture and like the TTA, Program in Global Studies at Missouri State University. simply “feel good” legislation. He claims “This wasn’t the first time lawmakers pulled this trick,” noting that the Joseph Bosco ([email protected]) is a consultant and Foreign Relations Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2003 former China country director at the US Department of called on President George W. Bush to study the Defense. feasibility of “expanding US-Taiwan military ties.” Hickey reports that “an angry Bush signed the bill Larry Osborn ([email protected]) is a (permitting the foreign policy establishment to function), retired US Navy captain and senior vice president of the but declared that there was no change to America’s ‘one Navy League of the United States, Honolulu Council. China’ policy.” Zhiqun Zhu ([email protected]) is professor of Then Hickey steps into a self-contradiction that political science and international relations at Bucknell substantially undercuts his argument. He notes with University. apparent approval that Bush lambasted Congress because he believed the language “impermissibly interferes with Joseph Bosco replies: the President’s constitutional authority to conduct the nation’s foreign affairs” – and that was just for a study of In PacNet #8, “Taiwan Travel Act: Bad Idea?” Professor the issue.
    [Show full text]
  • US-Taiwan Relations Remain Robust: Burghardt,” Taipei Times, July 14, 2012, Front Page
    University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 1-1-2013 U.S.-Taiwan Relations: A Study on the Taiwan Relations Act Jacqueline Anne Vitello University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Vitello, Jacqueline Anne, "U.S.-Taiwan Relations: A Study on the Taiwan Relations Act" (2013). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 947. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/947 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. U.S. Taiwan Relations: A Study on the Taiwan Relations Act __________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Josef Korbel School of International Studies University of Denver __________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts __________ by Jacqueline A. Vitello June 2013 Advisor: Dr. Suisheng Zhao Author: Jacqueline A. Vitello Title: U.S-Taiwan Relations: A Study on the Taiwan Relations Act Advisor: Dr. Suisheng Zhao Degree Date: June 2013 Abstract The relationship between the United States and Taiwan is of great importance to both parties. Taiwan offers certain strategic opportunities for the promotion of American national security interests, and the U.S. accordingly provides Taiwan with support of both a defensive and diplomatic nature. The official U.S. policies regarding relations with Taiwan are enumerated in the Taiwan Relations Act (United States Code Title 22 Chapter 48 Sections 3301 – 3316).
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing on the Taiwan Relations Act House International Relations Committee April 21, 2004 by Richard Bush the Brookings Institution
    Hearing on The Taiwan Relations Act House International Relations Committee April 21, 2004 By Richard Bush The Brookings Institution Key Points In passing the Taiwan Relations Act twenty-five years ago, Congress helped fortify a Taiwan that was reeling from the shock of de-recognition and the end of the mutual defense treaty. In the subsequent quarter decade, the TRA has grown in importance as an element of U.S. policy, and as a symbol of American resolve. The TRA has been effective because it has always been reinforced by a strong and continuing political commitment by the Congress and the American public. It is law and political commitment combined that have helped keep Taiwan secure and free and will do so in the future. The recent election in Taiwan offered a clear choice to Taiwan voters between the pan-Blue camp, which favors a more conciliatory policy towards China and the pan- Green camp, which emphasized Taiwan identity and reform of the political order. China views President Chen with deep suspicion and believes that his political agenda is tantamount to the permanent separation of Taiwan from China, and therefore a fundamental challenge to Chinese interests. That perception may well be incorrect. Ensuring that Beijing does not over-react will require careful management on all sides. The TRA has been an admirably flexible and effective instrument of U.S. policy and mechanism for the conduct of U.S.-Taiwan relations. It will remain so if the U.S. political commitment to the island remains strong, and fosters a policy consensus between the Congress and the executive branch.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia Trends 3 Article 1
    TRENDS THE U.S. AND THE INDO-PACIFIC UNDER TRUMP 1 Signals, Symbols and Sales: Recent Trends in U.S. Policy towards Taiwan1 | MAEVE WHELAN-WUEST Since 1979, when Washington switched its official recognition of China from the Republic of China (ROC) government in Taipei to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in Beijing, U.S. policy has remained steadfast in its strategic interest in cross-strait stability. Each incoming president has had to carefully balance American support for Taiwan with the United States’ changing and increasingly more intertwined relationship with China. In 2016, American and Taiwanese voters elected new presidents, both of whom campaigned to pursue more domestic-oriented policy agendas. Even before these elections, through which opposition parties entered the executive office and gained a sizable majority in the respective legislatures, 2017 was set to be a critical year for U.S.-Taiwan relations. With two new administrations in Washington and Taipei, Beijing’s calculations were surely going to alter and would undoubtedly test the position of the U.S. towards Taiwan. Nevertheless, a volatile start to the policies of both China and Taiwan under President Trump has meant that several distinct avenues have become the primary mechanisms through which the United States implements and signals its policy objectives, more so than under the Obama administration. 1 I would like to thank Richard C. Bush and Ryan L. Hass for their invaluable and constructive comments on the initial draft of this paper. ASIA TRENDS | SPRING 2018 21 These avenues are: diplomatic measures, Following the phone call, Donald Trump, defense reassurances, and legislative during a handful of interviews, questioned messaging.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H5757
    July 14, 2004 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H5757 the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. People’s Republic of China in areas adjacent (7) the United States Government should SMITH) that the House suspend the to the Taiwan Strait is a threat to the peace not discourage current officials of the Tai- rules and concur in the Senate concur- and security of the Western Pacific area; wan Government from visiting the United rent resolution, S. Con. Res. 114. Whereas section 3 of the Taiwan Relations States on the basis that doing so would vio- Act (22 U.S.C. 3302) requires that the United late the ‘‘one China policy’’. The question was taken. States Government will make available de- The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- The SPEAKER pro tempore. In the fense articles and defense services in such opinion of the Chair, two-thirds of quantity as may be necessary to enable Tai- ant to the rule, the gentleman from those present have voted in the affirm- wan to maintain a sufficient self-defense ca- New Jersey (Mr. SMITH) and the gen- ative. pability; tleman from California (Mr. LANTOS) Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, on that I Whereas the Taiwan Relations Act requires each will control 20 minutes. demand the yeas and nays. the United States to maintain the capacity Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, is either The yeas and nays were ordered. to resist any resort to force or other forms of gentleman opposed to the bill? The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- coercion that would jeopardize the security, Mr. LANTOS. No, Mr. Speaker. I am ant to clause 8 of rule XX and the or the social or economic system, of the peo- ple of Taiwan; strongly in support of this legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Draft, Not for Citation Historical Perspectives on the Taiwan
    Historical Perspectives on the Taiwan Relations Act Steven Phillips, Towson University AACS, October 2014, Washington, DC Draft: Not for citation or quotation. There exist several ways to understand or explain the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act (TRA). First, the TRA represented a turning point in the history of United States relations with Taiwan. The first half of this story runs from the early Cold War to the late 1970s, when President Jimmy Carter completed the process of rapprochement begun by Richard Nixon. Taiwan’s “consolation prize” for the switch in diplomatic recognition to the People’s Republic was the ambiguous commitment of the TRA. This narrative continues to the present as the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan struggles to maintain its international space and ties to Washington. Second is the story of the troubled presidency of Jimmy Carter, where domestic economic woes, foreign crises, and a sense of malaise led to the land-slide victory of Ronald Reagan and the rebirth of the Conservative movement in the United States. The TRA is one of many signs of growing discontent with Carter. Third is the long history of conflict between Congress and the President over foreign policy. The trends of the Nixon/Ford era combined with President Jimmy Carter’s weakness and a series of foreign policy crises to further embolden Congress. As one observer noted, “A careful analysis of the Taiwan Relations Act leaves no doubt that is does serve—in some respects, admirably—as an illuminating case study of congressional activism in foreign affairs.”1 He attributes this to a reaction to the growth of presidential power throughout the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Signals, Threats, and Deterrence: Alive and Well in the Taiwan Strait
    Catholic University Law Review Volume 47 Issue 1 Fall 1997 Article 4 1997 Signals, Threats, and Deterrence: Alive and Well in the Taiwan Strait Glenn R. Butterton Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation Glenn R. Butterton, Signals, Threats, and Deterrence: Alive and Well in the Taiwan Strait, 47 Cath. U. L. Rev. 51 (1998). Available at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol47/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Catholic University Law Review by an authorized editor of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SIGNALS, THREATS, AND DETERRENCE: ALIVE AND WELL IN THE TAIWAN STRAIT Glenn R. Butterton* Taiwan held its first democratic presidential elections in March 1996, which motivated mainland China to stage large scale con- temporaneous war games in the Taiwan Straitand aim unusually belligerent rhetoric at Taipei. The United States responded by deploying substantial naval forces in the area. After examining this confrontation between China, Taiwan, and the United States in terms of the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act, internationallaw, and non-nuclear deterrence theory, the author presents a novel analy- sis of indirect deterrence communication between the United States and China. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ....................................................................................52 II. R oots of D eterrence ......................................................................56
    [Show full text]
  • The Taiwan Issue and the Normalization of US-China Relations Richard Bush, Brookings Institution Shelley Rigger, Davidson Colleg
    The Taiwan Issue and the Normalization of US-China Relations Richard Bush, Brookings Institution Shelley Rigger, Davidson College The Taiwan Issue in US-China Normalization After 1949, there were many obstacles to normalization of relations between the United States and the new People’s Republic of China (PRC), but Taiwan was no doubt a key obstacle. The Kuomintang-led Republic of China (ROC) government and armies had retreated there. Washington maintained diplomatic relations with the ROC government and, in 1954-55, acceded to Chiang Kai-shek’s entreaties for a mutual defense treaty. After June 1950 with the outbreak of the Korean conflict, the United States took the position that the status of the island of Taiwan— whether it was part of the sovereign territory of China—was “yet to be determined.” More broadly, PRC leaders regarded the United States as a threat to their regime, particularly because of its support for the ROC, and American leaders viewed China as a threat to peace and stability in East Asia and to Taiwan, which they saw as an ally in the containment of Asian communism in general and China in particular. It was from Taiwan’s Ching Chuan Kang (CCK) airbase, for example, that U.S. B-52s flew bombing missions over North Vietnam. By the late 1960s, PRC and U.S. leaders recognized the strategic situation in Asia had changed, and that the geopolitical interests of the two countries were not in fundamental conflict. Jimmy Carter and Deng Xiaoping not only reaffirmed that assessment but also recognized a basis for economic cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening U.S.-Taiwan Defense Relations
    energ securit STRENGTHENING U.S.-TAIWAN rogra DEFENSE RELATIONS POLITICAL AND SECURITY AFFAIRS Foreword by Admiral Jonathan W. Greenert he U.S.-Taiwan relationship is under the spotlight at a critical time. Concerns are rising over China’s global campaign to undermine Taiwan’s legitimacy. A freeze has occurred in official cross-strait exchanges since the Tsai Ing-wen administration took office, the U.S.-China trade relationship is increasingly tense, and the Trump administration has shown a growing interest in Tthe Indo-Pacific region. Washington is certainly aware of Chinese assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific. The rapid pace of People’s Liberation Army (PLA) modernization has positioned China to carry out its active defense strategy in the western Pacific, South China Sea, and Indian Ocean within a few years. Despite the continuous presence of these strategic and military challenges, Washington still lacks a consensus on how to strike a balance between the merits of fostering defense relations with Taipei and the costs of retaliation from Beijing. During the Obama administration, the United States’ and Taiwan’s diverging views on defense policy and cooperation posed obstacles to bilateral security ties. Due to rapid Chinese military modernization and then president Ma Ying-jeou’s prioritization of relations with China, the United States developed an “asymmetrical defense” framework for its arms sales policy. This framework essentially meant that Taiwan had to rely on its geography and focus on anti-landing operations to counter a PLA amphibious invasion scenario. The United States expected Taiwan to invest most heavily in land-based mobile antiship cruise missiles, sea mines, and multiple-launch rocket systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (Taipei) Act of 2019
    PUBLIC LAW 116–135—MAR. 26, 2020 TAIWAN ALLIES INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION AND ENHANCEMENT INITIATIVE (TAIPEI) ACT OF 2019 VerDate Sep 11 2014 13:43 Mar 30, 2020 Jkt 099139 PO 00135 Frm 00001 Fmt 6579 Sfmt 6579 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL135.116 PUBL135 dkrause on LAP5T8D0R2PROD with PUBLAWS 134 STAT. 278 PUBLIC LAW 116–135—MAR. 26, 2020 Public Law 116–135 116th Congress An Act Mar. 26, 2020 To express United States support for Taiwan’s diplomatic alliances around the [S. 1678] world. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of Taiwan Allies the United States of America in Congress assembled, International Protection and SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. Enhancement Initiative This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taiwan Allies International (TAIPEI) Act Protection and Enhancement Initiative (TAIPEI) Act of 2019’’. of 2019. SEC. 2. DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS WITH TAIWAN. (a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following findings: (1) The Taiwan Relations Act of 1979 (Public Law 96– 8) states that it is the policy of the United States ‘‘to preserve and promote extensive, close, and friendly commercial, cultural, and other relations between the people of the United States and the people on Taiwan’’. (2) The Taiwan Relations Act of 1979 states that it is the policy of the United States ‘‘to maintain the capacity of the United States to resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion that would jeopardize the security, or the social or economic system, of the people on Taiwan’’. (3) Taiwan is a free, democratic, and prosperous nation of 23,000,000 people and an important contributor to peace and stability around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of the Taiwan Relations Act
    UNITEDSTATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE WASHImN, D.C. 20548 FORRELEASE ON DELIVEW Expected at 2:00 p.m. Tuesday, June 17, 1980 STATEMENTOF J.KENNETHFASICK DIRECTOR I IIllll I 112631 INTERNATIONALDIVISION BEFORETHE SUBCOMMITTEEON ASIAN ANDPACIFIC AFFAIRS HOUSECOMMITTEE ON FORGIGNAFFAIRS ON -*., 8” <”” IMPLEMENTATIONOF THE TAIWANRELATIONS ACT i, t %I,*I.i Mr. Chairman and Membersof the Subcommittee: We appreciate the opportunity to testify today on our review of the Implementation of the Taiwan Relations Act. This review was under- taken at the request of the Chairman, Subcommittee on East Asian and Pacific Affairs, Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. Although the Act has only been in effect about a year, enough experience has been gained for an assessment of successes and problems. In our review we looked at how the Taiwan Relations Act is being implemented. We focused on the operations of&&e ---~~.~~.-ll,"-ll.-_--"l.~".,""American Institute,"",, in Taiwan (AIT); the status of treaties and agreements; how Taiwan's military .".l"~,, """"',,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,, ,,".," ,,,, equipment needs will be determined: and how foreign military sales (FMS) to Taiwan are handled. In summary, we found that the Taiwan Relations Act is working. Although the form of U.S. relations with the peo- ple of Taiwan has changed, the substance has remained basi- cally the same. After an uneasy start, including a brief interruption in some aspects of relations, the mechanism for unofficial contacts is functioning fairly smoothly. BACKGROUNDON THE TAIWAN RELATIONS ACT After years of negotiations, the President announced on December 15, 1978, that the United States and the People's Republic of China (PRC) had agreed to establish full diploma- tic relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from the Taiwan Relations Act by Jaw-Ling Joanne Chang
    Lessons from the Taiwan Relations Act by Jaw-ling Joanne Chang wenty years ago the United States severed its diplomatic relations with the Republic of China (ROC).1 The Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) was Tthen enacted in 1979 to preserve and promote commercial, cultural, and other relations between the United States and Taiwan, and has been instrumental in maintaining peace, security, and stability in the Taiwan Strait. Joseph S. Nye, Jr., former assistant secretary for international security affairs in the U.S. Department of Defense, observed that the rise and fall of great powers has historically been accompanied by severe instability in international state systems.2 The power structure in East Asia today is marked by just such a rise and fall of great powers. The Soviet Union has collapsed, North Korea is dangerously volatile, Japan’s role is evolving, and China’s power is rapidly rising. Moreover, the Taiwan Strait crises of 1995–96 dem- onstrate that peace and stability in the region can no longer be taken for granted. According to a Pentagon report, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) now has 150–200 ballistic missiles aimed at Taiwan, and the island has a dangerously limited capacity to defend against missile attacks and threats.3 On July 9, 1999, President Lee Teng-hui told a German radio inter- viewer that the cross-strait relationship is a “special state-to-state relation- ship,” in sharp contrast to Beijing’s long-standing position that Taiwan is a renegade province of China and its government merely a local one. Since July 9, the PRC has mounted a publicity barrage against President Lee and used the Hong Kong media to conduct psychological warfare against Taiwan.
    [Show full text]