DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 5, Social, Cultural, and Economic Conditions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 5, Social, Cultural, and Economic Conditions Helena and Lewis & Clark National Forests Forest Plan Assessment Chapter 5, Social, Cultural, and Economic Conditions 2015 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 Process and Methods ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Scale ................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Existing Information .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Existing Condition ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 Culture and Lifestyles ............................................................................................................................................ 3 The Social Environment ......................................................................................................................................... 3 West ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 North ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Central ............................................................................................................................................................... 7 East .................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Land Ownership ................................................................................................................................................... 11 West ................................................................................................................................................................. 11 North ............................................................................................................................................................... 12 Central ............................................................................................................................................................. 13 East .................................................................................................................................................................. 13 Land Development, Land Use, and the Wildland Urban Interface ...................................................................... 14 West ................................................................................................................................................................. 16 North ............................................................................................................................................................... 17 Central ............................................................................................................................................................. 18 East .................................................................................................................................................................. 19 Demographic Conditions and Trends .................................................................................................................. 20 West ................................................................................................................................................................. 21 North ............................................................................................................................................................... 23 Central ............................................................................................................................................................. 25 East .................................................................................................................................................................. 26 Economic Conditions and Trends ........................................................................................................................ 28 Commodity Sectors ......................................................................................................................................... 28 Travel and Tourism .......................................................................................................................................... 39 Natural Amenities and the Economy ............................................................................................................... 41 Employment and Income ................................................................................................................................ 49 Wildland Dependency ..................................................................................................................................... 77 Federal Land Payments to States ........................................................................................................................ 80 Helena and Lewis & Clark National Forest’s Contributions to the Plan Area Economy ...................................... 91 Process and Methods ...................................................................................................................................... 91 Resource Program Data Used .......................................................................................................................... 92 Assessing the Economic Contributions of Major Industries in the HLC NFs Plan Area ................................... 93 HLC NFs Contributions to the Plan Area Economy .......................................................................................... 97 Recreation – A Special Case ............................................................................................................................. 99 The Secondary Area of Influence ...................................................................................................................... 100 Missoula, Anaconda-Deer Lodge, Gallatin, Park, Sweet Grass, Golden Valley, Yellowstone Counties......... 100 Climate Change Impacts .................................................................................................................................... 105 Vulnerability of Rural Communities .............................................................................................................. 105 Vulnerability associated with biophysical changes in the ecosystem ........................................................... 108 Environmental Justice ....................................................................................................................................... 110 West ............................................................................................................................................................... 111 North ............................................................................................................................................................. 113 Central ........................................................................................................................................................... 116 East ................................................................................................................................................................ 119 Trends and Drivers ................................................................................................................................................ 121 Information Needs................................................................................................................................................. 121 References ............................................................................................................................................................. 121 Tables Table 5.1 Population in the west area, 2000-2012 ................................................................................................... 5 Table 5.2 Population in the north area, 2000-2012 .................................................................................................. 6 Table 5.3 Population change in the central area, 1990-2012 ................................................................................... 8 Table 5.4 Population in the east area, 2000-2012 .................................................................................................. 10 Table 5.5 Land ownership, HLC NFs primary plan area-west .................................................................................. 12 Table 5.6 Land ownership, HLC NFs primary plan area-north ................................................................................. 12 Table 5.7 Land ownership, HLC NFs primary plan area-central .............................................................................. 13 Table 5.8 Land ownership, HLC NFs primary plan area-east ..................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Missouri River
    Welcome Message from Eileen Ryce Montana's Fish Chief After another long winter in Montana, it is time to get excited about spring. With spring comes new growth and, of course, a new fishing season. These regulation booklets get stuffed into tackle boxes, fly vests, glove boxes and backpacks all around Montana. They not only tell you how to fish legally - they also outline the great fishing opportunities all around the state. From high mountain lakes and reservoirs to large rivers and small streams, there is something for everyone. This year’s regulations have a slightly different layout. I hope you find it easier to use. For the second year in a row, we ran a photo competition for the front cover, and I hope you agree this year’s front cover model shows the joy that anyone can experience by getting out and fishing. For the back cover, we ran a competition for the best kids’ fish drawing. Briah Ard did a fantastic drawing of a Brook Stickleback. It’s great to see youth getting excited about fish. Keep your eye out for the 2020 Fishing Newsletter. As usual, it will be packed with lots of great information from our staff from around the state. Stop into one of the FWP offices to pick up your copy or visit http://fwp.mt.gov/fish/. I hope you have a great fishing season, and if you get the chance, take a kid fishing! Eileen Ryce 2Montana Fish Chief Visit fwp.mt.gov/fish 3 0 There’s a There’s a 0 bucket fuLL bucket fuLL 1 of troUble ofin montana’S troUble waters 1 in montana’S waters 2 2 New watercraft inspection regulations are in effectNew for watercraft2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri-Madison Project
    Hydropower Project Summary MISSOURI AND MADISON RIVERS, MONTANA MISSOURI-MADISON HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (P-2188) Hauser Dam Morony Dam Photos: PPL Montana This summary was produced by the Hydropower Reform Coalition and River Management Society Missouri and Madison Rivers, Montana MISSOURI AND MADISON RIVERS, MONTANA MISSOURI-MADISON HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (P-2188) DESCRIPTION: This hydropower license includes nine developments, of which eight were constructed between 1906 and 1930, and the ninth- the Cochrane dam- began operation in 1958. The projects are spread over 324 river-miles on the Missouri and Madison rivers. The Hebgen and Madison developments are located on the Madison River whereas the other seven- Hauser, Holter, Black Eagle, Rainbow, Cochrane, Ryan, and Morony- are located on the Missouri River. The Madison River flows into the Missouri River near the city of Three Forks, approximately 33 miles northwest of Bozeman. While this summary was being prepared, Northwestern Energy, a company based in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, and serving the Upper Midwest and Northwest, is in the process of acquiring this project. Read more at http://www.northwesternenergy.com/hydroelectric-facilities. A. SUMMARY 1. License application filed: November 25, 1992 2. License issued: September 27, 2000 3. License expiration: August 31, 2040 4. Waterway: Missouri and Madison Rivers 5. Capacity: 326.9 MW 6. Licensee: PPL Montana 7. Counties: Gallatin, Madison, Lewis and Clark, and Cascade Counties 8. Project area: Portions of the project are located on federal lands, including lands within the Gallatin and Helena National Forests 9. Project Website: http://www.pplmontana.com/producing+power/power+plants/PPL+Montana+Hyd ro.htm 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel T. Hauser and Hydroelectric Development on the Missouri River, 1898--1912
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1979 Victim of monopoly| Samuel T. Hauser and hydroelectric development on the Missouri River, 1898--1912 Alan S. Newell The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Newell, Alan S., "Victim of monopoly| Samuel T. Hauser and hydroelectric development on the Missouri River, 1898--1912" (1979). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 4013. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/4013 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976 THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED MANUSCRIPT IN WHICH COPYRIGHT SUB­ SISTS. ANY FURTHER REPRINTING OF ITS CONTENTS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE AUTHOR. MANSFIELD LIBRARY 7' UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA DATE: 1979 A VICTIM OF MONOPOLY: SAMUEL T. HAUSER AND HYDROELECTRIC DEVELOPMENT ON THE MISSOURI RIVER, 1898-1912 By Alan S. Newell B.A., University of Montana, 1970 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1979 Approved by: VuOiAxi Chairman,lairman, Board of Examiners De^n, Graduate SctooI /A- 7*? Date UMI Number: EP36398 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • ACM Smelter Residential Soil Health Consultation
    Health Consultation Exposure to Lead and Arsenic in Surface Soil, Black Eagle Community ANACONDA COPPER MINING COMPANY SMELTER AND REFINERY SITE GREAT FALLS, CASCADE COUNTY, MONTANA EPA FACILITY ID: MTD093291599 SEPTEMBER 15, 2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Community Health Investigations Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Health Consultation: A Note of Explanation A health consultation is a verbal or written response from ATSDR or ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partners to a specific request for information about health risks related to a specific site, a chemical release, or the presence of hazardous material. In order to prevent or mitigate exposures, a consultation may lead to specific actions, such as restricting use of or replacing water supplies; intensifying environmental sampling; restricting site access; or removing the contaminated material. In addition, consultations may recommend additional public health actions, such as conducting health surveillance activities to evaluate exposure or trends in adverse health outcomes; conducting biological indicators of exposure studies to assess exposure; and providing health education for health care providers and community members. This concludes the health consultation process for this site, unless additional information is obtained by ATSDR or ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner which, in the Agency’s opinion, indicates a need to revise or append the conclusions previously issued. You May Contact ATSDR Toll Free at 1-800-CDC-INFO or Visit our Home Page at: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov HEALTH CONSULTATION Exposure to Lead and Arsenic in Surface Soil, Black Eagle Community ANACONDA COPPER MINING COMPANY SMELTER AND REFINERY SITE GREAT FALLS, CASCADE COUNTY, MONTANA EPA FACILITY ID: MTD093291599 Prepared By: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Community Health Investigations Western Branch Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Fishing Regulations
    MONTANA FISHING REGULATIONS 20March 1, 2018 — F1ebruary 828, 2019 Fly fishing the Missouri River. Photo by Jason Savage For details on how to use these regulations, see page 2 fwp.mt.gov/fishing With your help, we can reduce poaching. MAKE THE CALL: 1-800-TIP-MONT FISH IDENTIFICATION KEY If you don’t know, let it go! CUTTHROAT TROUT are frequently mistaken for Rainbow Trout (see pictures below): 1. Turn the fish over and look under the jaw. Does it have a red or orange stripe? If yes—the fish is a Cutthroat Trout. Carefully release all Cutthroat Trout that cannot be legally harvested (see page 10, releasing fish). BULL TROUT are frequently mistaken for Brook Trout, Lake Trout or Brown Trout (see below): 1. Look for white edges on the front of the lower fins. If yes—it may be a Bull Trout. 2. Check the shape of the tail. Bull Trout have only a slightly forked tail compared to the lake trout’s deeply forked tail. 3. Is the dorsal (top) fin a clear olive color with no black spots or dark wavy lines? If yes—the fish is a Bull Trout. Carefully release Bull Trout (see page 10, releasing fish). MONTANA LAW REQUIRES: n All Bull Trout must be released immediately in Montana unless authorized. See Western District regulations. n Cutthroat Trout must be released immediately in many Montana waters. Check the district standard regulations and exceptions to know where you can harvest Cutthroat Trout. NATIVE FISH Westslope Cutthroat Trout Species of Concern small irregularly shaped black spots, sparse on belly Average Size: 6”–12” cutthroat slash— spots
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Walleye in the Missouri River Between Holter Dam and Great Falls, Montana
    An Evaluation of Walleye in the Missouri River between Holter Dam and Great Falls, Montana PPL-Montana MOTAC projects 771-09, 771-10, 759-11, 771-11 and Fisheries Bureau Federal Aid Job Progress Report Federal Aid Project Number F-113-R9, R10, R11, R12 Montana Statewide Fisheries Management Submitted to PPL-Montana 336 Rainbow Dam Great Falls, Mt. 59404 Prepared by Grant Grisak, Brad Tribby and Adam Strainer Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks 4600 Giant Springs Road Great Falls, Mt. 49505 January 2012 1 Table of Contents Introduction…………………………………………………………………………… 5 Study Area……………………………………………………………………………. 5 Creel survey………………………………………………………………… 10 Angling……………………………………………………………………... 10 Fish Abundance………………………………………………………………………. 11 Tagging……………………………………………………………………………….. 15 Radio Telemetry……………………………………………………………………… 17 Early Life History…………………………………………………………………….. 28 Diet…………………………………………………………………………………… 32 Discussion…………………………………………………………………………….. 34 References……………………………………………………………………………. 37 2 List of Tables No. Page 1. Angler use statistics for Missouri River section 9, 1991-2009………………... 8 2. Economic statistics for the Missouri River section 9, 1995-2009……………... 9 3. Angler use statistics for Missouri River section 8, combined angler days with 9 section 9, and economic statistics for section 8 and section 9, 1991- 2009……………………………………………………………………………. 4. Landmarks and associated river miles in the Missouri River between Holter 18 Dam and Black Eagle Dam……………………………………………………. 5. Meristics of radio tagged walleye in Missouri River, total miles traveled and 26 total days radio transmitter was active, 2008-2011……………………………. 6. Locations in the Missouri River and proportional use by radio tagged walleye 27 2008-10. Missouri River, Montana……………………………………………. 7. Young of the year walleye seined at sites in the Missouri River between 30 Cascade and Great Falls……………………………………………………….. 8. Number of fish species sampled by year and total number of sites where 31 found.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7. Active and Discontinued Streamflow-Gaging, Water-Quality, and Crest-Stage Gage Stations in Montana for Water Year 2007
    Table 7. Active and discontinued streamflow-gaging, water-quality, and crest-stage gage stations in Montana for water year 2007. [Active stations in bold print. Abbreviation: P, present (water year 2007). Symbol: --, no data] Period of record (by water year) Discharge or contents Water quality Drainage Daily Periodic area Specific Water Station (square Daily or Annual conduct- tempera- number Station name miles) monthly peak Sediment ance ture Biology Chemistry Sediment Hudson Bay Basin 05010000 Belly River at international boundary 74.8 1947-64 1948-64 -- -- -- -- -- -- 05010500 North Fork Belly River at international boundary 10.1 1947-56 1948-55 -- -- -- -- -- -- 05010700 Mountain View Irrigation District Canal near Mtn. View, Alberta -- 1935-80 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 05011000 Belly River near Mountain View, Alberta 121 1912-78 1912-78 -- -- -- -- -- -- 05011500 Waterton River near international boundary 61.0 1947-64 1948-64 -- -- -- -- -- -- 05012000 Street Creek at international boundary 6.0 1948-56 1948-55, -- -- -- -- -- -- 1964 05012500 Boundary Creek at international boundary 21.0 1948-64 1948-64 -- -- -- -- -- -- 05013000 Waterton River near Waterton Park, Alberta 238 1908-30, 1908-30, -- -- -- -- -- -- 1932-33, 1933, 1948-80 1948-79 05013500 St. Mary Lake near St. Mary 130 1929-61 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 05013600 St. Mary River near St. Mary 130 1961-62 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 05013700 St. Mary River above Swiftcurrent Creek, near Babb 173 1902-15 1902-15 -- -- -- -- -- -- 05013900 Grinnell Creek at Grinnell Glacier, near Many Glacier 1.1 1959-71 1960-63, -- -- -- -- -- -- 2004-P 1965-66, 1968-71, 2005-P 05014000 Grinnell Creek near Many Glacier 3.32 1949-78 1950-78 -- -- -- -- -- -- 05014300 Swiftcurrent Creek ab Swiftcurrent Lake, at Many Glacier 14.5 2003-P 2003-P -- -- -- -- 2001-P -- 05014500 Swiftcurrent Creek at Many Glacier 30.9 1912-P 1913-P -- -- 1967-70 -- -- 1964, 1966 1967-68, 1971 05015000 Canyon Creek near Many Glacier 7.1 1918-37 1919, -- -- -- -- -- -- 1921-27, 1929-31.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Listing Support Document
    United States Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. March Washington, D.C. 20460 2011 Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Support Document for the Revised National Priorities List Final Rule – ACM Smelter & Refinery Support Document for the Revised National Priorities List Final Rule ACM Smelter and Refinery March 2011 Site Assessment and Remedy Decisions Branch Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................v Introduction................................................................................................................................................vi Background of the NPL.........................................................................................................................vi Development of the NPL.......................................................................................................................vii Hazard Ranking System.......................................................................................................................vii Other Mechanisms for Listing ............................................................................................................viii Organization of this Document.............................................................................................................ix
    [Show full text]
  • Download the River's Edge Urban Trail
    Closed GROUP RIDES, HIKES, RUNS Great Falls Bicycle Club organizes rides year around for cyclists of all abilities, from twice weekly WELCOME DIRECTIONS training rides to Wednesday no rider left behind mountain bike rides. For details email [email protected] or visit them online at www.greatfallsbicycleclub.org. To reach the Ryan and Sulphur The River’s Edge Trail is a cooperative Spring Trailheads on the North project of the City of Great Falls, Cascade GrrAnimals Running Club runs Tuesday/Thursday mornings regardless of weather and organizes Shore Trail, drive 5 miles, turn County, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, weekend activities. Information is available at [email protected]. right on Morony Dam Road and Montana Department of Transportation, follow the signs. PPL Montana and a volunteer citizens Blister Sisters and Misters generally runs Monday and Thursday evenings and Saturday mornings. group, Recreational Trails, Inc. Planning, Details: Contact Wendy Lee at 406-868-1854 or [email protected]. design and construction of the trail began The Montana Wilderness Association in 1989 and continues today. River’s Edge US 87 / MT 225 organizes Winter and Summer Wilderness Walks. Trail is free and open to the public during To Fort Benton, Havre Information is available at www.wildmontana.org. daylight hours 365 days a year. Enjoy! Bay Drive Trail Visit the trail website at www.thetrail.org for Recreational Trails, Inc. maintains a list of organized walks, runs, races and events on River’s Edge more information. Trail throughout the year at www.thetrail.org. 18.18 GREAT FALLS I URBAN TRAILS LEGEND Black Eagle Memorial Island GREAT FALLS, MONTANA Streets/Roads I Paved Trails Rainbow Dam Road 29.
    [Show full text]
  • Canyon Ferry Unit History
    Canyon Ferry Project Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program Eric A. Stene Bureau of Reclamation 1994 Table of Contents Canyon Ferry Unit .............................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................2 Project Authorization.....................................................4 Construction History .....................................................5 Post Construction History ................................................18 Settlement of Project ....................................................18 Uses of Project Water ...................................................19 Conclusion............................................................20 About the Author .............................................................20 Bibliography ................................................................21 Manuscripts and Archival Collections.......................................21 Government Documents .................................................21 Books ................................................................21 Articles...............................................................21 Index ......................................................................22 1 Canyon Ferry Unit Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program As the Bureau of Reclamation approached its fiftieth birthday, its leaders envisioned projects on an increasingly grand scale. Reclamation's counterpart from the War Department,
    [Show full text]
  • A PDF Version
    I Great Falls, Montana has the lowest average airfares in Montana, and is Great Falls, Montana is in the Northern and Western hemispheres, located at the Intersection of Interstate HWY 15 and State HWY 200. receiving all four seasons of Spring, Summer, Fall and Winter! Temperatures vary by season as well, with average highs and lows CALGARY ranging. 319 miles \ ~ --~ FAHRENHEIT ~ HIGH IJ~: IF:: IM4:R I~RIM~ v I J~t IJ: 3L IA~; Is7E: Ios:T IN:3v ID 3Et SEATTLE MINNEAPOUS 670miles 967 miles LOW 15 16 23 31 39 46 51 SO 42 33 23 15 SPOKANE 364 miles CELSIUS JAN IFEB IMARI APRI MAY IJUN 'I JULIAUG ISEP IOCTi NOV IDEC HIGH 1.9 3.5 7.7 13.1 18.2 22.9 28.6 27.9 21 .31°14.3 6.3 1.4 LOW I-9.5 -8.7 -5.2 -.8 3.7 7 .8 10.8 10.2 5.6 4 -4.8 -9.5 'Data from US Climate » MONTANA'S Museum Capital SALT LAKE CITY » MONTANA'S Only City on the Missouri River 571 miles DENVER 770mlles » MONTANA'S Lowest Average Airfares » MONTANA'S Best Irish Pub » MONTANA'S Only live Mermaids » MONTANA'S Only City with 5 Falls ~ DELTA UNITED~ ~.,fg allegiant » MONTANA'S Most Visited State Park » MONTANA'S Best Coffee Shop Great Falls is serviced by Alaska Airlines, Delta, United and » NORTH AMERICA'S Largest Buffalo Jump Allegiant Air with direct flights from Salt Lake City, Denver, » NORTH AMERICA'S Largest Lewis & Cl ark Corps of Discovery Exhibit Minneapolis, Chicago (seasonally), Seattle, Phoenix & Las Vegas.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Dam – Hydro Newstm
    8/21/2015 Some Dam – Hydro News TM And Other Stuff i Quote of Note: “Don't worry about avoiding temptation. As you grow older, it will avoid you.” - Winston Churchill Some Dam - Hydro News Newsletter Archive for Back Issues and Search http://npdp.stanford.edu/ Click on Link (Some Dam - Hydro News) Bottom Right - Under Perspectives “Good wine is a necessity of life.” - -Thomas Jefferson Ron’s wine pick of the week: 2012 Odette Petite Sirah "Adaptation" “ No nation was ever drunk when wine was cheap. ” - - Thomas Jefferson Dams: (Dams don’t cause pollution, they just collect the crap others discharge into the river. That’s the problem! Henry Ford had a solution, but Congress wouldn’t adopt it – “Put every bodies discharge point upstream of their intake.” You could write a book on what’s wrong with this idea! They forgot Muddy Run Pumped Storage Project. Can you imagine the Susquehanna River Valley covered with solar panels that provide undependable power and only during sunlight? How do you replace over 2750 MW? How do you fix Peach Bottom Nuclear (1140 MW), and remove Conowingo (572 MW) and Muddy Run (1040 MW) projects with undependable wind and solar power? Comparing the Edwards project to Conowingo is like comparing it to tinker toys. These are scientists????? They sound like they’re looking for work!) Undamming rivers can offer a new source for clean energy Many hydroelectric dams produce modest amounts of power yet do enormous damage to rivers and fish. Why not free our rivers from these ageing structures and build solar farms in the drained reservoirs? John Waldman and Karin Limburg for Yale Environment 360, part of the Guardian Environment Network, 7 August 2015, theguardian.com 1 Copy obtained from the National Performance of Dams Program: http://npdp.stanford.edu Hydroelectric power is often touted as clean energy, but this claim is true only in the narrow sense of not causing air pollution.
    [Show full text]