DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Listing Support Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Listing Support Document United States Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. March Washington, D.C. 20460 2011 Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Support Document for the Revised National Priorities List Final Rule – ACM Smelter & Refinery Support Document for the Revised National Priorities List Final Rule ACM Smelter and Refinery March 2011 Site Assessment and Remedy Decisions Branch Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................v Introduction................................................................................................................................................vi Background of the NPL.........................................................................................................................vi Development of the NPL.......................................................................................................................vii Hazard Ranking System.......................................................................................................................vii Other Mechanisms for Listing ............................................................................................................viii Organization of this Document.............................................................................................................ix Glossary ..................................................................................................................................................ix 1. List of Commenters and Correspondence ........................................................................................1 2. Site Description ...................................................................................................................................3 3. Summary of Comments......................................................................................................................4 3.1 Need for Listing...........................................................................................................................5 3.2 Purpose of NPL ...........................................................................................................................6 3.3 Impacts of Listing .......................................................................................................................7 3.4 Previous NPL Decision (Rationale for Listing) ........................................................................7 3.5 Liability........................................................................................................................................8 3.6 Risk Associated with Site............................................................................................................9 3.7 Permitted Releases and Regulatory Limits.............................................................................12 3.8 Adequacy of Site Description...................................................................................................12 3.9 Extent of Site .............................................................................................................................13 3.10 Comments on HRS....................................................................................................................14 3.11 Scoring Other Pathways...........................................................................................................15 3.12 Consideration of Response Actions / Current Conditions.....................................................16 Sources Identified at Proposal .............................................................................................................17 i ACM Smelter & Refinery NPL Listing Support Document March 2011 3.13 Additional Sources ....................................................................................................................17 Source 4 – Slag Waste ........................................................................................................................18 3.14 Source 1......................................................................................................................................19 3.14.1 Hazardous Substances Associated with Source 1 ...............................................................19 3.14.2 Source 1 Delineation/Inference of Contamination..............................................................21 3.14.3 Sampling Procedures...........................................................................................................23 3.14.4 Other Sampling/Current Conditions ...................................................................................24 3.14.5 Source 1 Hazardous Waste Quantity...................................................................................26 3.14.6 Source 1 Containment.........................................................................................................28 3.15 Source 2......................................................................................................................................29 3.15.1 Source 2 Eligibility and Consideration of Response Activities ..........................................29 3.15.2 Association of Hazardous Substances with Source 2 .........................................................32 3.15.3 Source 2 Hazardous Waste Quantity...................................................................................33 3.15.4 Source 2 Containment.........................................................................................................35 3.16 Other Possible On-site Sources................................................................................................37 Surface Water Scoring at Proposal .....................................................................................................38 3.17 Evaluation of the Surface Water Pathway..............................................................................38 3.18 Description of Pathway.............................................................................................................41 Likelihood of Release............................................................................................................................44 3.19 Likelihood of Release - Observed Release by Direct Observation........................................44 3.19.1 Documentation of Observed Release by Direct Observation..............................................45 3.19.2 Quantity of Slag Dumped into the Missouri River .............................................................46 3.20 Surface Water Likelihood of Release - Observed Release by Chemical Analysis...............48 3.20.1 Surface Water Observed Release - Significant Increase.....................................................51 3.20.1.1 Contamination Levels below Regulatory Limits ..............................................................52 3.20.1.2 Releases in Other Aquatic Media......................................................................................53 3.20.1.3 Bias of Conclusions/Current Conditions...........................................................................54 3.20.1.4 Downstream Contaminant Levels.....................................................................................56 3.20.2 Surface Water Observed Release - Attribution...................................................................58 3.20.2.1 Attribution of Releases to On-Site Sources ......................................................................61 3.20.2.2 Other Possible Off-Site Sources........................................................................................63 3.20.2.3 Permitted Storm Water Discharges...................................................................................65 3.20.3 Surface Water Observed Release - Adequacy of Background............................................65 3.21 Potential to Release ...................................................................................................................66 Surface Water – Drinking Water Threat............................................................................................67 3.22 Surface Water - Drinking Water Threat ................................................................................67 Surface Water – Human Food Chain Threat.....................................................................................68 ii ACM Smelter & Refinery NPL Listing Support Document March 2011 3.23 Surface Water - Human Food Chain Threat Waste Characteristics ...................................69 3.23.1 Toxicity/Persistence/Bioaccumulation................................................................................69 3.23.2 Human Food Chain Threat Waste Quantity........................................................................71 3.23.3 Human Food Chain Threat Waste Characteristics ..............................................................72 3.24 Surface Water - Human Food Chain Threat Targets............................................................73 3.24.1 Targets Subject to Actual Contamination ...........................................................................76 3.24.2 Consideration of Existing Fish Tissue Data........................................................................77
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Helena Interagency Dispatch Center
    Helena Interagency Dispatch Center Cooperating Agencies: USDA Forest Service- Helena National Forest USDI Bureau of Land Management Montana Dept. of Natural Resources & Conservation- Central Lands Office Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Lewis and Clark, Broadwater, Jefferson and Meagher Counties Helena, Montana NEWS RELEASE For Release Immediately Contact:: Amy Teegarden Office: (406) 495-3747 Cell Phone: (406) 439-9135 FIRE RESTRICTIONS TO BEGIN THIS WEEK HELENA, MONT., July 17, 2007- Stage 1 fire restrictions will be implemented this Friday, by the Helena National Forest and members of the Helena Fire Restrictions division. “Thunderstorms coupled with record-breaking heat this week is a recipe for wildfires and local officials are instituting fire restrictions in an effort to reduce new fire starts.” stated Amy Teegarden, spokesperson for the Helena National Forest. Restrictions on smoking and open fires on federal and state lands, as well as on private-forested lands in Lewis and Clark County will take effect Friday, July 20 at 0001. Restrictions will be enforced on lands administered by the Helena National Forest, Bureau of Land Management and Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks in Lewis and Clark, Broadwater and Jefferson Counties. Under the restrictions campfires may be built only in developed recreation sites such as campgrounds and picnic areas. Campfires in rock rings and the use of wood stoves in canvas tents outside of campgrounds and other developed sites are prohibited. The Helena Interagency Dispatch Center provides initial
    [Show full text]
  • 009NAG – September 2012
    SOUTH AFRICA’S LEADING GAMING, COMPUTER & TECHNOLOGY MAGAZINE VOL 15 ISSUE 6 BORDERLANDS 2 COMPETITION Stuff you can’t buy anywhere! PC / PLAYSTATION / XBOX / NINTENDO PREVIEWS Sleeping Dogs Beyond: Two Souls Pikmin 3 Injustice: Gods among Us ENEMY UNKNOWN Is that a plasma rifl e in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me? ULTIMATE GAMING LOUNGE What your lounge should look like Contents Editor Michael “RedTide“ James Regulars [email protected] 10 Ed’s Note Assistant editor 12 Inbox Geoff “GeometriX“ Burrows 16 Bytes Staff writer Dane “Barkskin “ Remendes Opinion 16 I, Gamer Contributing editor Lauren “Guardi3n “ Das Neves 18 The Game Stalkerer 20 The Indie Investigatorgator Technical writer 22 Miktar’s Meanderingsrings Neo “ShockG“ Sibeko 83 Hardwired 98 Game Over Features International correspondent Miktar “Miktar” Dracon 30 TOPTOP 8 HOLYHOLY SH*TSH*T MOMENTS IN GAMING Contributors Previews Throughout gaming’s relatively short history, we’ve Rodain “Nandrew” Joubert 44 Sleeping Dogs been treated to a number of moments that very nearly Walt “Ramjet” Pretorius 46 Injustice: Gods Among Us made our minds explode out the back of our heads. Miklós “Mikit0707 “ Szecsei Find out what those are. Pippa “UnexpectedGirl” Tshabalala 48 Beyond: Two Souls Tarryn “Azimuth “ Van Der Byl 50 Pikmin 3 Adam “Madman” Liebman 52 The Cave 32 THE ULTIMATE GAMING LOUNGE Tired of your boring, traditional lounge fi lled with Art director boring, traditional lounge stuff ? Then read this! Chris “SAVAGE“ Savides Reviews Photography 60 Reviews: Introduction 36 READER U Chris “SAVAGE“ Savides The results of our recent reader survey have been 61 Short Reviews: Dreamstime.com tallied and weighed by humans better at mathematics Fotolia.com Death Rally / Deadlight and number-y stuff than we pretend to be! We’d like 62 The Secret World to share some of the less top-secret results with you.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri River
    Welcome Message from Eileen Ryce Montana's Fish Chief After another long winter in Montana, it is time to get excited about spring. With spring comes new growth and, of course, a new fishing season. These regulation booklets get stuffed into tackle boxes, fly vests, glove boxes and backpacks all around Montana. They not only tell you how to fish legally - they also outline the great fishing opportunities all around the state. From high mountain lakes and reservoirs to large rivers and small streams, there is something for everyone. This year’s regulations have a slightly different layout. I hope you find it easier to use. For the second year in a row, we ran a photo competition for the front cover, and I hope you agree this year’s front cover model shows the joy that anyone can experience by getting out and fishing. For the back cover, we ran a competition for the best kids’ fish drawing. Briah Ard did a fantastic drawing of a Brook Stickleback. It’s great to see youth getting excited about fish. Keep your eye out for the 2020 Fishing Newsletter. As usual, it will be packed with lots of great information from our staff from around the state. Stop into one of the FWP offices to pick up your copy or visit http://fwp.mt.gov/fish/. I hope you have a great fishing season, and if you get the chance, take a kid fishing! Eileen Ryce 2Montana Fish Chief Visit fwp.mt.gov/fish 3 0 There’s a There’s a 0 bucket fuLL bucket fuLL 1 of troUble ofin montana’S troUble waters 1 in montana’S waters 2 2 New watercraft inspection regulations are in effectNew for watercraft2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Slang: Language Mechanisms for Extensible Real-Time Shading Systems
    Slang: language mechanisms for extensible real-time shading systems YONG HE, Carnegie Mellon University KAYVON FATAHALIAN, Stanford University TIM FOLEY, NVIDIA Designers of real-time rendering engines must balance the conicting goals and GPU eciently, and minimizing CPU overhead using the new of maintaining clear, extensible shading systems and achieving high render- parameter binding model oered by the modern Direct3D 12 and ing performance. In response, engine architects have established eective de- Vulkan graphics APIs. sign patterns for authoring shading systems, and developed engine-specic To help navigate the tension between performance and maintain- code synthesis tools, ranging from preprocessor hacking to domain-specic able/extensible code, engine architects have established eective shading languages, to productively implement these patterns. The problem is design patterns for authoring shading systems, and developed code that proprietary tools add signicant complexity to modern engines, lack ad- vanced language features, and create additional challenges for learning and synthesis tools, ranging from preprocessor hacking, to metapro- adoption. We argue that the advantages of engine-specic code generation gramming, to engine-proprietary domain-specic languages (DSLs) tools can be achieved using the underlying GPU shading language directly, [Tatarchuk and Tchou 2017], for implementing these patterns. For provided the shading language is extended with a small number of best- example, the idea of shader components [He et al. 2017] was recently practice principles from modern, well-established programming languages. presented as a pattern for achieving both high rendering perfor- We identify that adding generics with interface constraints, associated types, mance and maintainable code structure when specializing shader and interface/structure extensions to existing C-like GPU shading languages code to coarse-grained features such as a surface material pattern or enables real-time renderer developers to build shading systems that are a tessellation eect.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri-Madison Project
    Hydropower Project Summary MISSOURI AND MADISON RIVERS, MONTANA MISSOURI-MADISON HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (P-2188) Hauser Dam Morony Dam Photos: PPL Montana This summary was produced by the Hydropower Reform Coalition and River Management Society Missouri and Madison Rivers, Montana MISSOURI AND MADISON RIVERS, MONTANA MISSOURI-MADISON HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (P-2188) DESCRIPTION: This hydropower license includes nine developments, of which eight were constructed between 1906 and 1930, and the ninth- the Cochrane dam- began operation in 1958. The projects are spread over 324 river-miles on the Missouri and Madison rivers. The Hebgen and Madison developments are located on the Madison River whereas the other seven- Hauser, Holter, Black Eagle, Rainbow, Cochrane, Ryan, and Morony- are located on the Missouri River. The Madison River flows into the Missouri River near the city of Three Forks, approximately 33 miles northwest of Bozeman. While this summary was being prepared, Northwestern Energy, a company based in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, and serving the Upper Midwest and Northwest, is in the process of acquiring this project. Read more at http://www.northwesternenergy.com/hydroelectric-facilities. A. SUMMARY 1. License application filed: November 25, 1992 2. License issued: September 27, 2000 3. License expiration: August 31, 2040 4. Waterway: Missouri and Madison Rivers 5. Capacity: 326.9 MW 6. Licensee: PPL Montana 7. Counties: Gallatin, Madison, Lewis and Clark, and Cascade Counties 8. Project area: Portions of the project are located on federal lands, including lands within the Gallatin and Helena National Forests 9. Project Website: http://www.pplmontana.com/producing+power/power+plants/PPL+Montana+Hyd ro.htm 10.
    [Show full text]
  • MONTANA 2018 Vacation & Relocation Guide
    HelenaMONTANA 2018 Vacation & Relocation Guide We≥ve got A Publication of the Helena Area Chamber of Commerce and The Convention & Visitors Bureau this! We will search for your new home, while you spend more time at the lake. There’s a level of knowledge our Helena real estate agents offer that goes beyond what’s on the paper – it’s this insight that leaves you confident in your decision to buy or sell. Visit us at bhhsmt.com Look for our new downtown office at: 50 S Park Avenue Helena, MT 59601 406.437.9493 A member of the franchise system BHH Affiliates, LLC. Equal Housing Opportunity. An Assisted Living & Memory Care community providing a Expect more! continuum of care for our friends, family & neighbors. NOW OPEN! 406.502.1001 3207 Colonial Dr, Helena | edgewoodseniorliving.com 2005, 2007, & 2016 People’s Choice Award Winner Sysum HELENA I 406-495-1195 I SYSUMHOME.COM Construction 2018 HELENA GUIDE Contents Landmark & Attractions and Sports & Recreation Map 6 Welcome to Helena, Attractions 8 Fun & Excitement 14 Montana’s capital city. Arts & Entertainment 18 The 2018 Official Guide to Helena brings you the best ideas for enjoying the Queen City - from Shopping 22 exploring and playing to living and working. Dining Guide 24 Sports & Recreation 28 We≥ve got Day Trips 34 A Great Place to Live 38 this! A Great Place to Retire 44 Where to Stay 46 ADVERTISING Kelly Hanson EDITORIAL Cathy Burwell Mike Mergenthaler Alana Cunningham PHOTOS Convention & Visitors Bureau Montana Office of Tourism Cover Photo: Mark LaRowe MAGAZINE DESIGN Allegra Marketing 4 Welcome to the beautiful city of Helena! It is my honor and great privilege to welcome you to the capital city of Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel T. Hauser and Hydroelectric Development on the Missouri River, 1898--1912
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1979 Victim of monopoly| Samuel T. Hauser and hydroelectric development on the Missouri River, 1898--1912 Alan S. Newell The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Newell, Alan S., "Victim of monopoly| Samuel T. Hauser and hydroelectric development on the Missouri River, 1898--1912" (1979). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 4013. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/4013 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976 THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED MANUSCRIPT IN WHICH COPYRIGHT SUB­ SISTS. ANY FURTHER REPRINTING OF ITS CONTENTS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE AUTHOR. MANSFIELD LIBRARY 7' UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA DATE: 1979 A VICTIM OF MONOPOLY: SAMUEL T. HAUSER AND HYDROELECTRIC DEVELOPMENT ON THE MISSOURI RIVER, 1898-1912 By Alan S. Newell B.A., University of Montana, 1970 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1979 Approved by: VuOiAxi Chairman,lairman, Board of Examiners De^n, Graduate SctooI /A- 7*? Date UMI Number: EP36398 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • ACM Smelter Residential Soil Health Consultation
    Health Consultation Exposure to Lead and Arsenic in Surface Soil, Black Eagle Community ANACONDA COPPER MINING COMPANY SMELTER AND REFINERY SITE GREAT FALLS, CASCADE COUNTY, MONTANA EPA FACILITY ID: MTD093291599 SEPTEMBER 15, 2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Community Health Investigations Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Health Consultation: A Note of Explanation A health consultation is a verbal or written response from ATSDR or ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partners to a specific request for information about health risks related to a specific site, a chemical release, or the presence of hazardous material. In order to prevent or mitigate exposures, a consultation may lead to specific actions, such as restricting use of or replacing water supplies; intensifying environmental sampling; restricting site access; or removing the contaminated material. In addition, consultations may recommend additional public health actions, such as conducting health surveillance activities to evaluate exposure or trends in adverse health outcomes; conducting biological indicators of exposure studies to assess exposure; and providing health education for health care providers and community members. This concludes the health consultation process for this site, unless additional information is obtained by ATSDR or ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner which, in the Agency’s opinion, indicates a need to revise or append the conclusions previously issued. You May Contact ATSDR Toll Free at 1-800-CDC-INFO or Visit our Home Page at: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov HEALTH CONSULTATION Exposure to Lead and Arsenic in Surface Soil, Black Eagle Community ANACONDA COPPER MINING COMPANY SMELTER AND REFINERY SITE GREAT FALLS, CASCADE COUNTY, MONTANA EPA FACILITY ID: MTD093291599 Prepared By: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Community Health Investigations Western Branch Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Create an Endless Running Game in Unity
    Zhang Yancan Create an Endless Running Game in Unity Bachelor’s Thesis Information Technology May 2016 DESCRIPTION Date of the bachelor's thesis 2/Dec/2016 Author(s) Degree programme and option Zhang Yancan Information Technology Name of the bachelor's thesis Create an Endless Running Game in Unity The fundamental purpose of the study is to explore how to create a game with Unity3D game engine. Another aim is to get familiar with the basic processes of making a game. By the end of the study, all the research objectives were achieved. In this study, the researcher firstly studied the theoretical frameworks of game engine and mainly focused on the Unity3D game engine. Then the theoretical knowledge was applied into practice. The project conducted during the research is to generate an endless running game, which allows the players getting points by keep moving on the ground and colleting coins that appeared during the game. In addition, the players need to dodge the enemies and pay attention to the gaps emerged on the ground. The outcomes of the study have accomplished the research purposes. The game created is able to function well during the gameplay as the researcher expected. All functions have displayed in game. Subject headings, (keywords) Unity3D, Endless running game, C# Pages Language URN 34 English Remarks, notes on appendices Tutor Bachelor’s thesis assigned by Mikkeli University of Applied Sciences (change Reijo Vuohelainen to a company name, if applicable) CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................ 1 2 THEORETICAL OF BACKGROUND GAME DESIGN .................................. 2 2.1 Game strategy design .................................................................................. 2 2.2 Game balance .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Experiments on Flow and Learning in Games : Creating Services to Support Efficient Serious Games Development
    Experiments on flow and learning in games : creating services to support efficient serious games development Citation for published version (APA): Pranantha Dolar, D. (2015). Experiments on flow and learning in games : creating services to support efficient serious games development. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. https://doi.org/10.6100/IR783192 DOI: 10.6100/IR783192 Document status and date: Published: 01/01/2015 Document Version: Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers) Please check the document version of this publication: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest MONTANA Visitvisit Southwest MONTANA
    visit SouthWest MONTANA visitvisit SouthWest MONTANA 2016 OFFICIAL REGIONAL TRAVEL GUIDE SOUTHWESTMT.COM • 800-879-1159 Powwow (Lisa Wareham) Sawtooth Lake (Chuck Haney) Pronghorn Antelope (Donnie Sexton) Bannack State Park (Donnie Sexton) SouthWest MONTANABetween Yellowstone National Park and Glacier National Park lies a landscape that encapsulates the best of what Montana’s about. Here, breathtaking crags pierce the bluest sky you’ve ever seen. Vast flocks of trumpeter swans splash down on the emerald waters of high mountain lakes. Quiet ghost towns beckon you back into history. Lively communities buzz with the welcoming vibe and creative energy of today’s frontier. Whether your passion is snowboarding or golfing, microbrews or monster trout, you’ll find endless riches in Southwest Montana. You’ll also find gems of places to enjoy a hearty meal or rest your head — from friendly roadside diners to lavish Western resorts. We look forward to sharing this Rexford Yaak Eureka Westby GLACIER Whitetail Babb Sweetgrass Four Flaxville NATIONAL Opheim Buttes Fortine Polebridge Sunburst Turner remarkable place with you. Trego St. Mary PARK Loring Whitewater Peerless Scobey Plentywood Lake Cut Bank Troy Apgar McDonald Browning Chinook Medicine Lake Libby West Glacier Columbia Shelby Falls Coram Rudyard Martin City Chester Froid Whitefish East Glacier Galata Havre Fort Hinsdale Saint Hungry Saco Lustre Horse Park Valier Box Belknap Marie Elder Dodson Vandalia Kalispell Essex Agency Heart Butte Malta Culbertson Kila Dupuyer Wolf Marion Bigfork Flathead River Glasgow Nashua Poplar Heron Big Sandy Point Somers Conrad Bainville Noxon Lakeside Rollins Bynum Brady Proctor Swan Lake Fort Fairview Trout Dayton Virgelle Peck Creek Elmo Fort Benton Loma Thompson Big Arm Choteau Landusky Zortman Sidney Falls Hot Springs Polson Lambert Crane CONTENTS Condon Fairfield Great Haugan Ronan Vaughn Plains Falls Savage De Borgia Charlo Augusta Winifred Bloomfield St.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Fishing Regulations
    MONTANA FISHING REGULATIONS 20March 1, 2018 — F1ebruary 828, 2019 Fly fishing the Missouri River. Photo by Jason Savage For details on how to use these regulations, see page 2 fwp.mt.gov/fishing With your help, we can reduce poaching. MAKE THE CALL: 1-800-TIP-MONT FISH IDENTIFICATION KEY If you don’t know, let it go! CUTTHROAT TROUT are frequently mistaken for Rainbow Trout (see pictures below): 1. Turn the fish over and look under the jaw. Does it have a red or orange stripe? If yes—the fish is a Cutthroat Trout. Carefully release all Cutthroat Trout that cannot be legally harvested (see page 10, releasing fish). BULL TROUT are frequently mistaken for Brook Trout, Lake Trout or Brown Trout (see below): 1. Look for white edges on the front of the lower fins. If yes—it may be a Bull Trout. 2. Check the shape of the tail. Bull Trout have only a slightly forked tail compared to the lake trout’s deeply forked tail. 3. Is the dorsal (top) fin a clear olive color with no black spots or dark wavy lines? If yes—the fish is a Bull Trout. Carefully release Bull Trout (see page 10, releasing fish). MONTANA LAW REQUIRES: n All Bull Trout must be released immediately in Montana unless authorized. See Western District regulations. n Cutthroat Trout must be released immediately in many Montana waters. Check the district standard regulations and exceptions to know where you can harvest Cutthroat Trout. NATIVE FISH Westslope Cutthroat Trout Species of Concern small irregularly shaped black spots, sparse on belly Average Size: 6”–12” cutthroat slash— spots
    [Show full text]