DOCSLIB.ORG

Aquatic Assessment in River Tana

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aquatic Assessment in River Tana Aquatic assessment in river Tana Water chemistry, invertebrates and fish in 6 tributaries Report 3 – 2019 Naturtjenester i Nord Holtveien 66 9016 Tromsø Org 983 342 663 Tlf 41423272 www.ninord.no Project Aquatic assessment in river Tana Project lead Contact Rune Muladal [Kontaktperson] ISBN Year Pages Contract no. 978-82-93524-01-4 2019 25 Lapland ELY-centre Publisher Finance Lapland Centre for Economic Development, Transport Naturtjenester i Nord and the Environment (Lapland ELY-centre) Referanse Muladal, R, og Huru, H. 2019 Aquatic assessment in the river Tana. Fish, invertebrate and water analyses in 6 tributaries in 2018 Rapport-3. Naturtjenester i Nord, 30 pages. Summary We have carried out surveys in 6 tributaries to river Tana. The result provides a snapshot of the water chemistry, and only hints for the overall water chemistry throughout the year. According to the classification guides Vuottasjohka, Tsulleveäijohka, Keädgejohka, Vuobmaveäijohka and Kuktsejohka can be classified as river type R206 (calcareous, humid) and Gossjohka as river type R207 (moderately calcareous, humid). The invertebrate fauna in six sites was investigated. The density of bottom animals varied widely with 24 to 257 individuals per sample, but despite the variation in density, the overall ecological condition was not effected. Gossjohka had the lowest bottom animal densities, but when Norwegian and Finnish samples were merged, the condition became very good. Electrofishing was carried out in 4 tributaries of a total of 1850 m2 distributed over 11 stations. The catch was dominated by salmon and trout juveniles .A total of 7 species were registered and the highest densities of salmon were in Gossjohka. Project leader Quality control Rune Muladal Helge Huru 2 1. Preface Naturtjenester i Nord (NINORD) were commissioned by Lapland Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment (Lapland ELY-centre) to conduct aquatic survey in 6 tributaries of Tana river system. Responsible for the surveys (planning, sampling and reporting) have been Rune Muladal who, together with Grzegorz Wierbinski, also carried out the field work (NINORD). Analysis of invertebrates have been carried out by Helge Huru (NINORD) and Gaute Kjærstad (NTNU). Contact person at the client has been Jukka Ylikörkkö, who has also contributed with relevant information according sampling and infrastruture. We thank ELY for the cooperation and the assignment of the project. Tromsø, Mars 2019 3 2. Content 1. Preface ..................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Content ..................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 4. Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 6 4.1. Water quality sampling and analysis ................................................................................... 6 4.2. Macroinvertebrate sampling and analysis .......................................................................... 7 4.3. Electrofishing ...................................................................................................................... 7 4.4. Indexing ............................................................................................................................... 8 4.5. Survey locations .................................................................................................................. 9 5. Results .................................................................................................................................... 10 5.1. Water chemistry ................................................................................................................ 10 Invertebrate – ecological status .................................................................................................. 10 5.2. Fish .................................................................................................................................... 13 5.2.1. Vuottašjohka (234-590-R) ................................................................................................ 13 5.2.2. Goššjohka (234-83-R) ...................................................................................................... 14 5.2.3. Vuobmeveäjohka and Kuktsejohka .................................................................................. 14 6. References ............................................................................................................................. 15 6.1. Appendix 1 Sampling stations ........................................................................................... 16 6.1.1. Vuobmaveäijohka (Anarjohka) ......................................................................................... 16 6.1.2. Tsulloveäijohka (Tana) ..................................................................................................... 17 6.1.3. Keädgejohka (Tana) ......................................................................................................... 18 6.1.4. Kuktsejohka (Utsjohki) ..................................................................................................... 19 6.1.5. Vuottasjohka .................................................................................................................... 20 6.1.6. Gossjohka ........................................................................................................................ 21 6.2. Appendix 2. Invertebrate ................................................................................................... 22 4 3. Introduction The River Teno (Tana in Norwegian) is located in northern Norway and northern Finland and it runs via Tanafjord into the Barents Sea. The river system (drainage area 16386 km2) is one of the most important Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., rivers in the world with annual in-river catches of 60-250 t and more than 1200 km of rivers accessible to migrating adult salmon. The river Tana system supports at least 20 genetically differentiated salmon populations in the main stem and in its tributaries (Vähä et al., 2007, 2008). Naturtjenester I Nord was commissioned to carry out surveys in 6 tributaries to Tana in autumn 2018. The rivers Vuottasjohka / Iesjohka and Gossjohka / Anarjohka (Norway) and Tsulleveäijohka / Tana, Keädgejohka / Tana, Vuobmaveäijohka / Inarijohki and Kuktsejohka / Utsjoki (Finland) has been assessed for water chemistry, invertebreates and juvenile atlantic salmon. The survey is a part of Joint Environmental Management of the River Tana Interreg project, which is coordinated by Lapland ELY- centre in cooperation with the County Governor of Finnmark and the Tana municipalities. Due to challenging situation with high water flow no registrations were carried out in Bavvtajohka. The purpose in this project is to fill data gaps in the regional aquatic monitoring, map suitable long- term monitoring stations and to compare different national benthic sampling methods. The survey include three parts: 1. Macroinvertebrate sampling and analysis 2. Electrofishing 3. Water quality sampling and analysis 5 4. Methodology The fieldwork was done 23-25th September under descending water levels after a period of rain. According to the water framework directive, the results from water chemistry or fish communities measured after only one collection are not sufficient to assess the ecological status of the quality elements of chemistry and fish. On the other hand, the methodology satisfies the assessment of ecological status based on the quality element “bottom fauna” (invertebrates). To measure the deviation from the reference state, the ratio of observed values to water-type-specific reference values for the relevant parameter or index is calculated. This ratio is called ecological quality ratio (EQR), and normalized EQR (n-EQR) varies from 0 to 1, where 1 is best (reference state). The class limits are given in the norwegian supervisor (Veileder 02: 2018)1. 4.1. Water quality sampling and analysis Water in each station is sampled one time during the biological survey at an undisturbed site. Samples are collected from depth about 25 cm in appropriate containers and cooled before analyzes. The samples are processed in the laboratory (Eurofins) (see table 1). Table 1. Parameters analysed from water samples in the project. 1 http://www.vannportalen.no/globalassets/nasjonalt/dokumenter/veiledere-direktoratsgruppa/Klassifisering-av-miljotilstand-i- vann-02-2018.pdf 6 4.2. Macroinvertebrate sampling and analysis Sampling is conducted according to national standards A and B, were given in the tender background and explained in principle below. The subscriber provides field sheets to be filled at site. At stations 1 and 4 both methods are applied. From these sides the total number of samples includes the 4x30 second samples by method A) and the 3-minute sample by the method B). The identification of invertebrate fauna are given in the taxa resolution applied . Reporting includes summary of the findings using relevant indices and expertise, comparison of the two method's results from stations 1 and 4, the raw data in taxa densities per sample and copies of the field sheets (attachement to this report).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Endring Av Tillatelse Til Landing Med Helikopter I Øvre Anarjohka Nasjonalpark
    FYLKESMANNEN I FINNMARK FINNMÁRKKU FYLKKAMÁNNI Miljøvernavdelingen Birasgáhttenossodat Bongo / Hætta / Sokki siida v/ Mikkel Per Bongo Stornes 9520 KAUTOKEINO Deres ref Deres dato Vår ref Vår dato Sak 2016/2326 10.06.2016 Ark 432.3 Saksbehandler/direkte telefon: Jan Erik Knutsen - 78 95 03 14 Endring av tillatelse til landing med helikopter i Øvre Anarjohka nasjonalpark Vi viser til brev datert 25. mai 2016, vårt saksnummer 2016/2326, hvor Bongo/Hætta/Sokki siida v/Mikkel Per Bongo ble innvilget tillatelse til to landinger med helikopter i Øvre Anarjohka nasjonalpark. Tillatelsen ble avgrenset til tidsrommet 23. mai – 10. juni 2016. Søker kontaktet Fylkesmannen på telefon den 8. juni, hvor han informerte om at de ikke fikk gjennomført flyvningene før 10. juni på grunn av at det ikke har vært mulig å få tak i helikopter. De tar imidlertid sikte på å få gjennomført det i løpet av uke 24. Fylkesmannen viser til vurderingene som fremgår av vedlagte vedtak av 25. mai 2016. Formålet og forutsetningene for tillatelsen er fortsatt de samme. I og med at tillatelsen ikke er benyttet vurderer Fylkesmannen at endring av dato kun utgjør en mindre endring av gjeldende tillatelse. Fylkesmannen vedtar på den bakgrunn å endre tillatelsen slik at den er gyldig til og med 30. juni 2016. Vedtaket gjøres med hjemmel i naturmangfoldloven § 48 første ledd første alternativ. For øvrig gjelder de vilkår og forutsetninger som fremgår i brev av 25. mai 2016. Vedtaket kan påklages til Miljødirektoratet innen 3 uker, jamfør forvaltningsloven §§ 28 og 29. Klagen skal være skriftlig og begrunnet og sendes via Fylkesmannen i Finnmark, jamfør forvaltningsloven § 32.
    [Show full text]
  • The Horseshoe of Fennoscandia, Norway, Rein Midteng
    The Horseshoe of Fennoscandia-A corridor for the long term survival of old-growth forest dependent species in Norway, Sweden and Finland. Rein Midteng, Asplan Viak. Norway. [email protected] 1.What is the Horseshoe of Fennoskandia? 2. What is its ecologial function? 3. Which subparts does it consist of? 4.Transboundary zones 5. How continuous and broad is the Horseshoe? 6. Key regions and areas in need of protection 7. Futher emphazis Un-protected old-growth forest in Pasvik 1.What is the Horseshoe of Fennoskandia? • Its a more or less continously corridor of old-growth forests from southern Finland/southeast Karealia to southern Norway/Sweden. • It consists of four subparts that are connected as a whole. These four subparts are although presented individually. In addition, it exists so called transboundary zones, which are “green” corridors with mostly continuously old-growth forests that stretch out from the Horseshoe. • Old-growth forests dominate the Horseshoe while in the rest of Fennoscandia culture forests dominate. • It consist of both protected and unprotected old-growth forests. • It includes a great variation of vegetationzones and foresttypes. • It is of major importance in the implementation of the Nagaya goals • It is of major importance for the preservation of old-growth forest species in Norway, Sweden, Finland and probably also in some parts of Russia. 2. What is its (ecologial) function? • It is a migrationzone east-west (since the last ice age), and the Fennoscandinavian countries share therefore to a large extent the same flora and fauna as Russia (low level of endemism). • It provides an exchange of species, individuals and genes to and forth in the Horseshoe.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Structure and Gene Flow in a Continuously Distributed Large Terrestrial Carnivore - the Brown Bear (Ursus Arctos) in Northern Europe
    Norwegian University of Life Sciences Faculty of Environmental Science and Technology Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management Philosophiae Doctor (PhD) Thesis 2015:72 Genetic structure and gene flow in a continuously distributed large terrestrial carnivore - the brown bear (Ursus arctos) in Northern Europe Genetisk struktur og genflyt i et kontinuerlig distribuert stort rovdyr - den nordeuropeiske brunbjørn (Ursus arctos) Julia Schregel Genetic structure and gene flow in a continuously distributed large terrestrial carnivore - the brown bear (Ursus arctos) in Northern Europe Genetisk struktur og genflyt i et kontinuerlig distribuert stort rovdyr - den nordeuropeiske brunbjørn (Ursus arctos) Philosophiae Doctor (PhD) Thesis Julia Schregel Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management Faculty of Environmental Science and Technology Norwegian University of Life Sciences Ås 2015 Thesis number 2015:72 ISSN 1894-6402 ISBN 978-82-575-1309-2 PhD supervisors Dr Snorre B. Hagen1 Dr Hans Geir Eiken1 Professor Jon E. Swenson2 1Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy (NIBIO), Section of Biotechnology and Molecular Genetics, Frederik A. Dahls vei 20, N-1430 Ås, Norway 2NMBU, Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management P.O.Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway PhD evaluation committee Professor Ettore Randi University of Bologna Instituto Superiore per la protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (ISPRA) Via Cà Fornacetta 9 I-40064 Ozzano dell'Emilia (BO), Italy Dr Øystein Flagstad Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) P.O.Box 5685 Sluppen N-7485 Trondheim, Norway Committee coordinator Dr Katrine Eldegard NMBU, Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management P.O.Box 5003N-1432 Ås, Norway ii Table of contents Summary ................................................................................................................................... v Sammendrag ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the River Tana Salmon Populations
    STATUS OF THE RIVER TANA SALMON POPULATIONS REPORT 1-2012 OF THE WORKING GROUP ON SALMON MONITORING AND RESEARCH IN THE TANA RIVER SYSTEM Contents 1 Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2 The group mandate and presentation of members ..................................................................... 10 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 11 4 The River Tana, the Tana salmon, salmon fisheries and management ........................................ 12 4.1 The Tana and its salmon ....................................................................................................... 12 4.2 Tana salmon fisheries ........................................................................................................... 17 4.3 Management of the Tana salmon fishing ............................................................................. 28 5 Local/traditional knowledge and local contact ............................................................................. 29 5.1 How the Group will approach these issues........................................................................... 29 5.2 Current locally raised issues .................................................................................................. 31 5.2.1 Predation ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tillatelse Til Felling Av Jerv I Øvre Anarjohka Nasjonalpark
    Miljødirektoratet Postboks 5672 Torgarden 7485 TRONDHEIM Deres ref Vår ref Dato 15/412-10 22. mars 2019 Tillatelse til felling av jerv i Øvre Anarjohka nasjonalpark - vinteren 2019 Klima- og miljødepartementet vedtar med hjemmel i verneforskriften for Øvre Anarjohka nasjonalpark at det kan felles inntil to jerv innenfor nasjonalparken. Beslutningen er begrunnet i skadesituasjonen for tamrein i området, bestandsstatusen til jerv og den effekten et uttak samlet sett vil ha på jervebestanden. Beslutningen gjelder i tidsrommet f.o.m. 21. mars t.o.m. 15. mai. Beslutningen gjelder kun innenfor nasjonalparkens grenser og erstatter ikke nødvendige tillatelser etter andre lover og forskrifter. Bakgrunn Miljødirektoratet ønsker å fatte beslutning om ekstraordinært uttak av inntil to jerv innenfor Øvre Anarjohka nasjonalpark i Finnmark fylke, med hjemmel i naturmangfoldloven § 18 tredje ledd, jf. første ledd b og § 77, jf. rovviltforskriften § 13, jf. §§ 1 og 3. Bakgrunnen er potensialet for tap av tamrein til jerv. Direktoratet opplyser at det så langt i 2019 ikke er funnet/registrert mange kadaver av rein innenfor nasjonalparken, men tidligere år viser et relativt høyt antall kadaverfunn, verifisert tapt til jerv. Vinteren 2017/2018 (november til og med mars) ble det funnet 49 kadaver verifisert tapt til jerv og 3 kadaverfunn med usikker vurdering. Kadaverleting er generelt vanskelig i disse vinterbeiteområdene hvor reinflokkene går tett og gjetere kjører rundt reinflokkene for å holde de adskilt fra hverandre. Gjetere unngår i størst mulig grad å kjøre inn i reinflokkene fordi de da lager spor som reinen kan følge og dette kan forårsake sammenblanding. Funn av reinkadaver er derfor helst i ytterkanten av flokken, da gjetere i liten grad følger jervesporene inn i reinflokkene.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Salmon Monitoring and Research in the Tana River System
    Norwegian‐Finnish working group on monitoring and research in Tana Atlantic salmon monitoring and research in the Tana river system Outlining a monitoring and research program for the River Tana within the framework of the precautionary approach Morten Johansen, Jaakko Erkinaro, Eero Niemelä, Tor G. Heggberget, Martin A. Svenning, Sturla Brørs 2008 Atlantic salmon monitoring and research in the Tana river system Preface This report concludes the work of a working group put down to draft a monitoring and research program for the Atlantic salmon resource in River Tana, within the framework of the precautionary approach given by The North Atlantic Salmon Concervation Organization (NASCO). The mandate of The Tana Working Group (TWG) was outlined through joint meetings and co‐operation between The Directorate for Nature Management (DN) and The Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute (FGFRI/RKTL). The report is the responsibility of the Tana Working Group, and is based on both published and unpublished reports and data. In this report the working group suggests to establish a permanent Norwegian‐Finnish monitoring and research group for the Tana river system. At present such a group is under formation. The tasks of the group will be to give annual reports on Atlantic salmon stock status including trends in stock development, evaluate stock status according to NASCO's guidelines to the precautionary approach, identify knowledge gaps related these aspects. The group also can be asked to answer questions posed by the authorities concerning salmon management in Tana River system. Furthermore, tasks of a permanent group task list may be developed in the course of establishing.
    [Show full text]
  • 4569 72Dpi.Pdf (943.5Kb)
    O - 8 8 1 9 2 OVERVÅKING AV TANAVASSDRAGET Årsrapport for 2001 Saksbehandler: Tor S. Traaen, NIVA. Medarbeidere: Harald Muladal, Fylkesmannen i Finnmark. Pekka Räinä, Annukka Puro, Outi Mähönen, Markku Örn, Lapplands Miljøsenter. NIVA - 4569-2002 Forord Den finsk-norske overvåkingen av Tanavassdraget startet i 1988 som følge av vedtak i den Finsk-Norske Grensevassdrags kommisjonen. Undersøkelsene er administrert av Fylkesmannen i Finnmark og Lapplands Miljøsenter. Fra finsk side ble prosjektet administrert av seksjonssjef Pekka Räinä, mens Marjaleena Nenonen har deltatt i planleggingen av undersøkelsen. Vassdragsforvalter Kjell Moen administrete prosjektet fra norsk side inntil sin altfor tidlige bortgang. Ny prosjektadministrator er vassdragsforvalter Harald Muladal, som også har revidert rapportens innledning. Denne rapporten omhandler resultatene fra undersøkelsene i 2001. Det meste av vannprøvetakingen er utført av Fylkesmannen i Finnmark og Statsskog, Finnmark. De vannkjemiske og bakteriologiske analysene er utført ved Lapplands Miljøsenter i Rovaniemi. Tor S. Traaen, Oslo Oslo, august 2002 NIVA - 4569-2002 Innhold Sammendrag 5 Summary 6 1. INNLEDNING 7 1.1 Beskrivelse av Tanavassdraget 7 1.2 Stasjonsvalg og analyseprogram 9 2. VANNKJEMI 11 2.1 Generell vannkjemi 11 2.2 Næringssalter og organisk stoff 13 2.3 Metaller 16 3. HYGIENISK VANNKVALITET 17 4. LITTERATUR 20 Vedlegg A. Vannkjemiske tabeller. 21 NIVA - 4569-2002 Sammendrag Den vannkjemiske overvåkingen i Tanavassdraget 1988-1993 omfattet vannkjemiske og bakteriologiske analyser på 7 stasjoner i hovedvassdraget og 10 stasjoner i sidevassdrag. De fleste stasjonene ble prøvetatt 4 ganger i året. På grunn av de store variasjonene i vannkjemiske parametre gjennom året i Tanaelva, ble prøvetakingen fra 1994 utvidet fra 4 ganger pr.
    [Show full text]
  • POSSIBLE GIFT of INDIGENOUS EPISTEMES By
    TOWARD THE HOSPITALITY OF THE ACADEMY: THE (IM)POSSIBLE GIFT OF INDIGENOUS EPISTEMES by RAUNA JOHANNA KUOKKANEN M.A., The University of Oulu, Finland, 1997 M.A., The University of British Columbia, 2001 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (The Centre for Study of Curriculum and Instruction) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA July 2004 © Rauna Johanna Kuokkanen, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract iii Acknowledgements SV INTRODUCTION 1 The Concept of Indigenous Peoples 10 Structure of the Thesis 17 PARTI i. DEATNU - THE RIVER 21 ii. GIFT 52 Classic Gift Theories 55 The Logic of the Gift in Reciprocity with the Land 61 The Sami Perception of the World 62 Forms of Reciprocity 67 Scholarly 'Give Back' 73 Gift as a Threat 78 PART II CHAPTER ONE: CRITIQUES OF THE ACADEMY 81 'University in Crisis' 89 Feminist Critiques 92 Critiques of Anthropology 99 Indigenous Criticisms 103 Racism in the Academy 108 CHAPTER TWO: CULTURAL CONFLICTS AND EPISTEMIC IGNORANCE 113 Critiques of 'Culture' 120 The Concept of Episteme 123 Indigenous Epistemes 126 Epistemic Ignorance and Indigenous People 132 Passive Ignorance 136 Active Ignorance 140 CHAPTER THREE: THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF THE GIFT 146 The Problem of 'Speaking' 150 Native Informant 159 Gift as the Impossible 162 The Question of Recognition 167 CHAPTER FOUR: 'LEARNING TO LEARN' 174 Knowing the 'Other' 177 Problem of 'Indianism' 180 Indigenous Studies
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Conservation Goals for the Critically Endangered Arctic Fox in Scandinavia
    CAFF 2018, 9-12 October 2018, Rovaniemi, Finland Status and conservation goals for the critically endangered Arctic fox in Scandinavia. When is the mission completed? Nina E. Eide1, Anders Angerbjörn2, Stefan Blumenthrat1, Arild Landa1, Bodil Elmhagen2, Karin Noren2, Heikki Henttonen3, Toumo Ollila4, Øystein Flagstad1 www.nina.no Why critically endangered, despite 80 yrs protection? Foto: Henrik Eira Foto: www.nina.no I – small population + - - + II www.nina.no– lack of lemmings III – more red fox CR Critically endangered national & regional red lists www.nina.no Conservation measures starts 1998..2005..2011..running Foto: Henrik Eira Foto: www.nina.no Supplemental feeding Foto: © Kristian Sivertsen, Statskog Fjelltjenesten www.nina.no Supplemental feeding 30.000 kg dry dogpellet/yr www.nina.no Red fox culling N= 4750 www.nina.no Captive breeding and release (2005 ->) www.nina.no Captive breeding and release 2006- 1 litter, 6 cubs 2007 – 4 litters , 20 cubs 2008 – 7 litters, 32 cubs 2009 – 6 litters, 39 cubs 2010 – 9 litters, 71 cubs 2011 - 7 litters, 42 cubs 2012 – 6 litters, 27 cubs 2013 – 6 litters, 41 cubs 2014 – 6 litters, 24 cubs 2015 - 7 litters, 31 cubs 2016 – 5 litters, 17 cubs 2017 – 7 litters, 51 cubs 2018 – 7 litters, 48 cubs Totally > 453 valper www.nina.no Captive breeding and release N=368 released (48 to be released in 2019) Foto: Morgan Frelsøy, OPP www.nina.no Captive breeding and release Supported by: artificial den sites www.nina.no Captive breeding and release Supported by: feeding stations www.nina.no 1998 2015 50 SEFALO SEFALO+ Felles Fjellrev 40 Finland 30 0-5 0-5 20 10 0 100 80 Sweden 60 20-40 100-135 40 20 0 60 Number of arctic fox litters arctic of fox Number Norway Captive breeding 40 Arctic fox Finnmark 20 15-40 100-125 0 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 (Angerbjörnwww.nina.no et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest for All Forever
    FSC National Risk Assessment For Norway DEVELOPED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURE FSC-PRO-60-002 V3-0 Version V1-0 Code FSC-NRA-NO V1-0 National approval National decision body: The Norwegian FSC NRA - Working Group / Steinar Asakskogen Date: 31 January 2018 International approval FSC International Center: Performance and Standards Unit Date: 27 August 2018 International contact Name: Anand Punja – European Regional Director FSC International Email address: [email protected] Period of validity Date of approval: 27 August 2018 Valid until: (date of approval + 5 years) Body responsible for NRA The Norwegian FSC NRA - Working group maintenance FSC-NRA-NO V1-0 NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR NORWAY 2018 – 1 of 222 – Contents Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for Norway ........................................................ 3 Background information .............................................................................................................. 5 List of experts involved in the risk assessment ......................................................................... 13 National Risk Assessment maintenance ................................................................................... 14 Complaints and disputes regarding the approved National Risk Assessment ........................... 14 List of key stakeholders for consultation ................................................................................... 15 Risk assessments ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Modellering Av Isdammer I Karasjohka
    Modellering av isdammer i Karasjohka Norges vassdrags- og energidirektorat 2001 Rapport nr 14 /2001 Modellering av is dammer i Karasjohka Utgitt av: Norges vassdrags- og energidirektorat Forfatter: Øyvind Lier Trykk: NVEs hustrykkeri Opplag: 30 Forsidefoto: Sagat ISSN: 1501-2832 ISBN 82-410-0447-8 Sammendrag: Det er foretatt en modellering av fremtidige isdammer nedstrøms Karasjok. Emneord: Isdam, isoppstuvning, flomsone, flom, flomanalyse, flomareal, vannlinjeberegning, Karasjohka, Karasjok kommune, Tana. Norges vassdrags- og energidirektorat Middelthuns gate 29 Postboks 5091 Majorstua 0301 OSLO Telefon: 22959595 Telefaks: 22959000 Internett: www.nve.no 2 Forord I forbindelse med flomsonekartprosjektet ble det besluttet å lage en modell av isdammer for Karasjohka ved Karasjok tettsted. Historisk sett har det vært flere tilfeller hvor isdammer har gitt betydelige oversvømmelser i Karasjok. En slik ismodell vil gi en indikasjon på hvor lang tid det vil ta før effektene av oppdemningen når bebyggelsen, samt hvor høy vannstanden vil kunne bli ved en isdam nedstrøms Karasjok tettsted. Narvik, juni 200 l Are Mobæk avdelingsdirektør Øyvind Lier avdelingsingeniør 3 Sammendrag I forbindelse med flomsonekartprosjektet er det foretatt en modellering av isdammer i Karasjohka ved Karasjok tettsted. Isdammer har historisk voldt større skader enn ordinære flommer og denne analysen vil gi en innsikt i hva som kan skje dersom større isdemninger får etablere seg nedstrøms Karasjok. En isdam i dette området vil etter all sannsynlighet oppstå igjen. Flomskadene kan bli betydelige og er avhengig av dammens plassering. For å forhindre fremtidige flomskader bør kommunen ikke tillate bygging i områder som har blitt oversvømt ved tidligere isdammer. Modellen viser at en isdam kan oversvØmme deler av Karasjok forholdsvis raskt.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological State of the River Tenojoki –
    Regional Environmental Publications Regional Environmental Publications 417 417 Ecological State of the River Tenojoki – Communities Macrozoobenthos and Fish – Periphyton, Ecological State of the River Tenojoki Sari Sivonen (ed.) Periphyton, Macrozoobenthos and Fish Communities The transboundary River Tenojoki running between Finland and Norway is a sub-arctic, oligotrophic river. The river is one of the biggest and the most Ecological State of the River Tenojoki – productive Atlantic salmon rivers in the world that is still in its natural state. The brooks, tributaries and main channel of the River Tenojoki form a river Periphyton, Macrozoobenthos and Fish Communities reach in excess of 1 000 km long that is a suitable habitat for salmon and has potential areas for spawning. This publication includes four articles, which describe and assess the ecological state of the River Tenojoki. The article on periphyton survey was written by Juha Miettinen (University of Joensuu) and the articles concerning macro- zoobenthos, fish communities and effects of culvert restorations on juvenile Atlantic salmon were written by Heikki Erkinaro and Jaakko Erkinaro (Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute). These articles were drawn up as a part of an Interreg III A North project named ”Preservation of the River Tenojoki as a salmon river in its natural state – environmental work, ecological condition and monitoring”. The project was carried out during years 2002–2006 by the Lapland Regional Environment Centre and Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate. The publication is also available in the Internet: http://www.environment.fi/publications ISBN 11-2156-4 ISBN 11-2157-2 (PDF) ISSN 1238-8610 Fos sale at: Lapland Regional Environment Centre P.O.
    [Show full text]