What Is the Function of the Lamb in Revelation 5?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
POINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY What is the function of the lamb in Revelation 5? Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for graduation with Masters of Arts in Religion: Theology Department of Theology and Philosophy By: Billy Jack Blankenship San Diego, California October 2011 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1. AUTHORSHIP, DATING, AND SETTING 6 Apocalypticism and Apocalyptic Genre 6 Revelation: John’s Apocalypse 21 CHAPTER 2. SURVEY OF RECENT SCHOLARSHIP 27 CHAPTER 3. METAPHOR THEORY 43 Metaphor Defined 43 Metaphor in Biblical Thought 46 Lion and Lamb Metaphors 51 CHAPTER 3. THE FUNCTION OF THE LAMB 64 Lamb: A Surprising Character in the Narrative 66 Victory: The way of God vs. the way of the Empire 73 The Lamb: Revelation of God’s Character 81 CONCLUSION 86 BIBLIOGRAPHY 90 Introduction “It is that Lamb, slaughtered for our sins and risen for our salvation, who is in control of the events that sweep and swirl around us, clouding with the dust of history in our vision of that final goal.”1 The book of Revelation is a mysterious text, and the response to the book varies greatly for those in the church and academic institutions. Unfortunately these sacred texts are often misunderstood, abused, or altogether ignored. Many congregations can go years without engaging these texts, foregoing personal or group study, or teaching from the pulpit. On the other hand, some writers and preachers misrepresent the book of Revelation as a text that predicts future events, portrays the violent end of the world, or presents a picture of God’s narrative that undermines the beauty and hope of the text. The work undertaken in this project is an opportunity to engage in the ongoing conversation with scholars, church leaders, and others who study John’s apocalypse. The goal of this project is multileveled. First, it is an exercise in how to thoughtfully engage biblical texts from the first century social setting. One will not be able to understand the meaning of John’s message by simply reading the words on the pages. Misunderstandings often occur in regard to the prophetic nature, violent language, and unclear imagery of the book of Revelation. The process of researching and writing this thesis is a great lesson in how to approach ancient texts found in scripture—taking into account the context, use of metaphor and imagery, and past research. Second, it provides the opportunity to approach the book of Revelation within the context of 1 Paul J. Achtemeier, “Revelation 5:1-14,” Interpretation 40, no. 3 (1986): 288. 1 ministry in the local church. There is often a gap between those in the pews and those in the academic institution—a gap that is seemingly apparent in the study of John’s Apocalypse. One aspiration of this work is that those in the church who are not involved in academic research can engage the beautiful themes of worship and hope in John’s apocalypse. Admittedly, one element of this thesis is to undo some of what has been done by church leaders and teachers in my own past. Therefore, this project allows me the opportunity to converse with and teach these texts to those in the local church who seek the hope offered in the message of the revelation of Jesus Christ (1:1). Thesis Topic and Project Goal The goal of this project is to explore the role of the lamb metaphor in Revelation 5. The function of the lamb is the key to unlock the layers of imagery and meaning of the message in John’s Apocalypse. In brief, the function of the lamb metaphor in Revelation 5 is to reveal the nature of God and the way God achieves victory over evil—most clearly portrayed in the worthiness of the lamb, which is understood to be the sacrificial death and resurrection of Christ. John transformed the messianic expectations of his first century audience by utilizing an unexpected metaphor—the lamb rather than the lion. Through this surprising switch, John transformed the notion of victory (nike). God’s victory over evil does not come through the military force, violence, or exploitation that is characteristic of the emperor and the Roman Empire—characteristics often associated with the power and ferocity of the lion metaphor. Rather, true victory is demonstrated through God’s sacrificial love in Jesus the messiah, a slaughtered lamb. 2 By utilizing the lamb metaphor, John not only transformed the messianic expectations of his audience, he undermined the ideology that defined the Roman Empire—power, coercion, and worship of the emperor. For those under Roman rule during the first century nike occurred through brutal military might and coercion. If John had used the lion metaphor, the narrative would have taken on a different form. God’s victory would be achieved through the same means as that of Rome—power, force, and ferocity. By employing the vulnerable, non-violent lamb, not only did John portray the sacrificial nature of God’s love, he also raised a figure that stood in opposition of the empire. Therefore, the function of the lamb revealed the true nature of God’s love. But it also showed a new way for the followers of the lamb, an alternate way than that of caesar and the dominant empire. Chapter Organization To support the thesis above, my investigation is organized in four chapters. Chapter 1 is a general outline of the cultural setting and context of John’s apocalypse. When did John write, and how did that culture affect his use of language and imagery? After the authorship and dating of the composition are discussed, the central thrust of chapter 1 covers the apocalyptic literary genre, and the form, content, and function of this movement. In this section, I will rely heavily on the scholarship of John J. Collins, Adela Yarbro Collins, and David Aune. In particular, I will reference their works on apocalyptic thought, early Christian apocalypticism, and the issues of genre that shaped John’s apocalypse. Reconstructing historical context has proven to be a difficult undertaking. However, if one is to engage the message of Revelation, the lamb in Revelation 5 in particular, he or she must have a solid understanding of the type of literary devices that 3 were common in ancient Mediterranean literature, the movement of apocalypticism, and the cultural realities that shaped the author’s message, themes, and purpose. The setting and context of first century Rome and early Christian apocalyptic was the literary “air” that John breathed. In order to fully comprehend his use of the lamb in Revelation 5, we must first root the study in that cultural context. Chapter 2 is a survey of recent scholarship on Revelation 5, in particular the lamb metaphor. The sections of chapter 2 are organized by the names of scholars that have contributed to the on-going dialogue and study of Revelation 5—through books, articles, lectures, and/or commentaries. The amount of scholarship and research that has been conducted on this topic is considerable, and much of it is beyond the limits of this study. Therefore, the works referenced in the survey of scholarship reflect the direction of this thesis. While all of the works referred to in this chapter contributed to this thesis, the most notable works that supported this project are Loren L. Johns’s The Lamb Christology of the Apocalypse of John,2 David Aune’s three-volume work on Revelation,3 and Russell S. Morton’s One Upon the Throne and the Lamb: A Tradition Historical/Theological Analysis of Revelation 4-5.4 The survey of recent scholarship lays a foundation to engage in the ongoing dialogue on chapter 5 of John’s apocalypse. Chapter 3 sets the stage for the method utilized in this project to support the overall thesis: a study of metaphor. This chapter is an overview of metaphor theory that helps shape our understanding of John’s use of the lamb metaphor and the rhetorical 2 Loren L. Johns, The Lamb Christology of the Apocalypse of John (Tubigen: Mohr Siebeck, 2003). 3 David Aune, Revelation (3 vols., WBC; Dallas , Texas: Word Books, 1997-98). 4 Russell S. Morton, One Upon the Throne and the Lamb: A Tradition Historical/Theological Analysis of Revelation 4-5 (New York: Peter Lang, 2007), 10. 4 force of the metaphor in Revelation 5. To be clear, this is a study of the metaphor of the lamb, rather than an exegetical study of Revelation 5. This section will outline past and current scholarship on metaphor theory and the use of metaphor in the Bible. While there were no theories of metaphor during the time John composed his apocalypse, metaphors were certainly employed by John and other authors. The key feature of this section is to review the work of scholars such as Max Black, George Lakoff, and Peter Macky. By doing so, I hope to better define metaphor and understand the use of metaphor in the biblical texts, focusing particularly on Peter Macky’s work on metaphor in biblical settings. John’s use of metaphor is extensive, and chapter 3 helps us lay a foundation to study the function of the lamb metaphor. Lastly, chapter 4 is a description of the central argument of the project, the function of the lamb in Revelation 5. The lamb was not a typical metaphor utilized in apocalyptic literature; John’s use of this vulnerable figure was a surprising, if not shocking, change in the narrative. The rhetorical force of John’s message is centered in his use of the lamb metaphor that transformed the way his first century audience understood the nature of God’s victory over evil.