Internal Medicine Research Administration: November 22, 2017 Update

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Internal Medicine Research Administration: November 22, 2017 Update Internal Medicine Research Administration: November 22, 2017 Update UU Research Reproducibility Grand Rounds Tuesdays 12-1PM thru April 24, 2018 – Partial schedule below Garden Level, Synapse Bays Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library This series includes weekly discussions to raise awareness about reproducibility issues, showcase Utah researchers’ work, and to create an open forum for discussion. In addition, an immersive workshop and conference is scheduled for June 2018. For more information and a complete schedule, visit the Grand Rounds: Research Reproducibility site. Schedule: November 28th – January 30th, 12:00-1:00, Eccles Health Sciences Library Nov 28 Erin Rothwell Reproducibility and Qualitative Research Dec 5 Ram Gouripeddi Reproducible Informatics for Reproducible Research Dec 12 Tom Greene Error Terms Jan 9 Bryan W Jones Peer Reviewing Images Jan 16 Mallory Kidwell Incentives to Embrace Change: Initiatives to Promote Research Reproducibility Jan 23 Willard Dere CCTS Jan 30 Rob Singleton University-wide Performance Metrics for Clinical Trials FDA Inspections: What you Need to Know if the FDA Contacts you From IM Clinical Research Compliance (SOP REG-01) The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducts inspections of clinical trials to ensure the rights, safety and welfare of subjects are protected, and to determine the accuracy of clinical trial data. Routine Inspections are most common, and are triggered by a New Drug Application submission by a study sponsor; generally, clinical sites with the highest enrollment are selected for inspection. For Cause Inspections are infrequent and generally arise when the FDA receives reports of deviations, subject safety, misconduct, etc. Inspection Notification and Preparation The FDA will notify the Principal Investigator (PI) of an inspection. The PI should in turn notify the sponsor, department leadership, Internal Medicine Associate Director for Clinical Research Compliance (Scott Low), and the Office of General Counsel. With assistance from study coordinators and the IM Associate Director for Clinical Research Compliance, the PI should review study documentation and records in preparation for the inspection, including screening/enrollment logs, delegation logs, training records, informed consent forms, patient research charts, case report forms and the regulatory binder. The study records should be reviewed for completeness and accuracy; any issues or deficiencies discovered during the review should be addressed and corrected as appropriate. Conduct of the Inspection FDA inspectors will present their ID/credentials and Notice of Inspection (form FDA-482) upon arrival. The inspection is primarily conducted through: questioning investigators and staff about clinical research practices and procedures, conducting a physical inspection of site facilities, and a thorough review of study documentation. Whenever possible, the PI should request a daily meeting to determine if there are outstanding issues, questions or concerns that can be addressed while the inspectors are on-site. At the conclusion of the inspection, any formal observations or findings will be provided to the PI on the Inspectional Observations form (FDA-483). The PI should ask the investigators what specific responses, actions or changes will adequately address the cited Inspectional Observations. Post-FDA Inspection The PI will work with the Office of General Counsel, the IM Associate Director for Clinical Research Compliance and other personnel as needed to draft an official written response to the Inspectional Observations. Written responses should include a root cause analysis of the observation and a measured corrective and preventative action plan (CAPA), such that further occurrences of the issue will not take place. Realistic timelines and evaluation metrics should be included for implementation and assessment of all corrective actions. The FDA inspection may be followed by an official letter (Informational Letter or Warning Letter) issued by the FDA Office of Scientific Investigations. Any outstanding problems or issues in such a letter should be promptly assessed and addressed, and a response provided to the FDA within the scope and time frame required in the official letter. Further information, guidance and examples can be found in this Internal Medicine Research Administration SOP, which is located on the Pulse web site: https://pulse.utah.edu/site/internal-medicine/Documents/Forms/ResearchAdmin.aspx Questions: Scott J. Low, MBA; IM Associate Director for Research Compliance; [email protected] From the AAMC 11/10/17 PNAS Opinion: The Next Generation Researchers Initiative at NIH A PNAS article by NIH Deputy Director Mike Lauer, PhD, Principal Deputy Director Lawrence Tabak, DDS, PhD, and Director Francis Collins, MD, PhD, discusses the NIH's Next Generation Researchers Initiative, which aims to redistribute funding to reverse trends in the current hypercompetitive environment that lead to an aging biomedical workforce. To do this, the NIH plans to fund 200 more early-career and 200 more mid-career scientists in FY 2017 than were funded in FY 2016. This policy will result in funding for 2,000 additional early- and mid-career scientists who would have otherwise been just under the payline for research project grants. The NIH has also established a Working Group of the Advisory Committee to the NIH Director to explore new productivity measures for more equitable funding distribution. In the near term, money may be redistributed from "recent Congressional budget increases, from lower allocations to institute-initiated research programs, from selected decisions to reduce increments in funding for investigators who are already well funded, and from greater allocations to certain targeted programs." NIH FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES For all active NIH funding opportunity announcements (FOAs), please visit: NIH Funding Opportunities. ARCHIVED RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION UPDATES Past and present updates are published online here for quick reference. IM RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION CONTACTS Chris LaSalle Director [email protected] 585-2734 Scott Low Associate Director, [email protected] 585-1380 Clinical Research Compliance Jennifer Hammond Research Manager [email protected] 581-6526 Ashley Kapron Special Projects Manager [email protected] 585-2084 Kris Larrabee Grants and Contracts Manager [email protected] 585-7655 Jessica Little Research Manager [email protected] 581-3694 Heather Parkin Senior Grants and Contracts Officer [email protected] 585-7090 Mary Jane Tinnes Clinical Research Coordinator [email protected] 585-2254 Sally Bradstreet Clinical Research Coordinator [email protected] 581-4684 .
Recommended publications
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in a Black
    L OPEN ACCESS Freely available online al of euk rn em u i o a J Journal of Leukemia ISSN: 2329-6917 Case Report Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in A Black African Man: A Cameroonian Case Report Raspail Carrel Founou1*, Julius Nwobegahay2, Regine Gandji3, Cedrice Tsayem4, Sandra Yopa5, Martin Kuete6 and Luria Leslie Founou7 1Department of Clinical Microbiology, Centre of Expertise and Biological Diagnostic of Cameroon (CEDBCAM), Yaounde, Cameroon; 2Military Health Research Centre (CRESAR), Yaounde, Cameroon; 3Department of Biological Sciences, Higher Institute of Medical Technology, Yaoundé, Cameroon; 4Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Centre of Expertise and Biological Diagnostic of Cameroon (CEDBCAM), Yaounde, Cameroon; 5Department of Emergency, District Hospital of Biyem-Assi, Yaounde, Cameroon; 6Department of Biomedical and Applied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Université des Montagnes, Bangante, Cameroon; 7Department of Food Safety and Environmental Microbiology, Centre of Expertise and Biological Diagnostic of Cameroon (CEDBCAM), Yaounde, Cameroo ABSTRACT Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is an acquired monoclonal disorder characterized by a gradual accumulation of functionally incompetent lymphocytes. It generally presents a clonal B cells arrested in the B-cell differentiation pathway that resemble morphologically to mature lymphocytes in the peripheral blood. There is a scarcity of CLL data among sub-Saharan African countries such as Cameroon. We herein report a case of CLL that remained stable over a period of seven years in a 54 years old Black African man. The patient had no history of exposure to toxic chemicals or ionizing radiation and presented with several complaints and clinical symptoms. Clinical and laboratory investigations indicated a CLL in stage B of the Binet staging system.
    [Show full text]
  • Generating Real-World Evidence by Strengthening Real-World Data Sources
    Generating Real-World Evidence by Strengthening Real-World Data Sources Using “real-world evidence” to bring new “Every day, health care professionals are updating patients’ treatments to patients as part of the 21st electronic health records with data on clinical outcomes Century Cures Act (the “Cures Act”) is a key resulting from medical interventions used in routine clinical priority for the Department of Health and practice. As our experience with new medical products Human Services (HHS). Specifically, the Cures expands, our knowledge about how to best maximize their Act places focus on the use of real-world data benefits and minimize potential risks sharpens with each data to support regulatory decision-making, including point we gather. Every clinical use of a product produces data the approval of new indications for existing that can help better inform us about its safety and efficacy.” drugs in order to make drug development faster jacqueline corrigan-curay, md, jd and more efficient. As such, the Cures Act director of the office of medical policy in fda’s center for drug evaluation and research has tasked the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to develop a framework and guidance for evaluating real-world evidence in the context of drug regulation.1 Under the FDA’s framework, real-world evidence (RWE) is generated by different study designs or analyses, including but not limited to, randomized trials like large simple trials, pragmatic trials, and observational studies. RWE is the clinical evidence about the use, potential benefits, and potential risks of a medical product based on an analysis of real-world data (RWD).
    [Show full text]
  • Autopsy Case Report and Review of the Literature Karyna C
    Fatal Neonatal Echovirus 6 Infection: Autopsy Case Report and Review of the Literature Karyna C. Ventura, M.D., Hal Hawkins, M.D., Ph.D., Michael B. Smith, M.D., David H. Walker, M.D. Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas CASE REPORT A full-term, healthy male neonate was delivered by caesarian section to a 26-year-old primigravida A full-term boy appropriate for his gestational age woman who had a history of fever and upper respi- was born via caesarian section to a 26-year-old G1P0 ratory tract infection. On the fourth day of life, the Latin American woman who had a medical history of a well-controlled seizure disorder for which she was neonate developed a sepsis-like syndrome, acute receiving carbamazepine. She had received regular respiratory and renal failure, and disseminated in- prenatal care, with negative prenatal serologic tests travascular coagulopathy. He died 13 days after for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, birth. Postmortem examination revealed jaundice, and syphilis. Two weeks before delivery, she experi- anasarca, massive hepatic necrosis, adrenal hemor- enced fever and an upper respiratory tract infection. rhagic necrosis, renal medullary hemorrhage, hem- At birth, the infant weighed 3838 g and had an Apgar orrhagic noninflammatory pneumonia, and severe score of 9. The neonate was put under an oxygen encephalomalacia. Echovirus type 6 was isolated hood, then was later slowly weaned from it. On his from blood, liver, and lungs. Although uncommon, fourth day of life, the neonate developed fever echovirus type 6 infection may produce a spectrum (38.6°C) and was observed to have decreased activity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Case Reports in Systematic Reviews from Rare Diseases
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article The Value of Case Reports in Systematic Reviews from Rare Diseases. The Example of Enzyme Replacement Therapy (ERT) in Patients with Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II (MPS-II) Miguel Sampayo-Cordero 1,2,*, Bernat Miguel-Huguet 3, Andrea Malfettone 1,2, José Manuel Pérez-García 1,2,4, Antonio Llombart-Cussac 1,2,5, Javier Cortés 1,2,4,6, Almudena Pardo 7 and Jordi Pérez-López 8 1 Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MedSIR), Ridgewood, NJ 07450, USA; [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (J.M.P.-G.); [email protected] (A.L.-C.); [email protected] (J.C.) 2 Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MedSIR), 08018 Barcelona, Spain 3 Department of Surgery, Hospital de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; [email protected] 4 Institute of Breast Cancer, Quiron Group, 08023 Barcelona, Spain 5 Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Universidad Católica de Valencia “San Vicente Mártir”, 46015 Valencia, Spain 6 Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), 08035 Barcelona, Spain 7 Albiotech Consultores y Redacción Científica S.L., 28035 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] 8 Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Vall d’Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 3 August 2020; Accepted: 7 September 2020; Published: 10 September 2020 Abstract: Background: Case reports are usually excluded from systematic reviews. Patients with rare diseases are more dependent on novel individualized strategies than patients with common diseases. We reviewed and summarized the novelties reported by case reports in mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS-II) patients treated with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT).
    [Show full text]
  • Repeatability Case Study of the 3D Printer in the School of Engineering and Applied Science Lab Naif Faleh S
    Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Masters Theses & Specialist Projects Graduate School Spring 2018 Repeatability Case Study of the 3D Printer in the School of Engineering and Applied Science Lab Naif Faleh S. Albaiji Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses Part of the Ergonomics Commons, Industrial Engineering Commons, Operational Research Commons, and the Other Operations Research, Systems Engineering and Industrial Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Albaiji, Naif Faleh S., "Repeatability Case Study of the 3D Printer in the School of Engineering and Applied Science Lab" (2018). Masters Theses & Specialist Projects. Paper 2359. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/2359 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses & Specialist Projects by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REPEATABILITY CASE STUDY OF THE 3D PRINTER IN THE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND APPLIED SCIENCES LAB A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the School of Engineering and Applied Science Western Kentucky University Bowling Green, Kentucky In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science By Naif Albaiji May 2018 I dedicate this thesis to my family, especially my mother, Laila Altaie, my father, Faleh, and my brother, Fawaz Albaiji. They have supported me since day one to ensure that I find my way to success. I also dedicate this work to the School of Engineering and Applied Science, my thesis committee, and my professors who have guided me. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank several people who inspired and helped me throughout my journey with this study and degree: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • EPI Case Study 1 Incidence, Prevalence, and Disease
    EPIDEMIOLOGY CASE STUDY 1: Incidence, Prevalence, and Disease Surveillance; Historical Trends in the Epidemiology of M. tuberculosis STUDENT VERSION 1.0 EPI Case Study 1: Incidence, Prevalence, and Disease Surveillance; Historical Trends in the Epidemiology of M. tuberculosis Estimated Time to Complete Exercise: 30 minutes LEARNING OBJECTIVES At the completion of this Case Study, participants should be able to: ¾ Explain why denominators are necessary when comparing changes in morbidity and mortality over time ¾ Distinguish between incidence rates and prevalence ratios ¾ Calculate and interpret cause-specific morbidity and mortality rates ¾ Describe how changes in mortality or morbidity could be due to an artifact rather than a real change ASPH EPIDEMIOLOGY COMPETENCIES ADDRESSED C. 3. Describe a public health problem in terms of magnitude, person, place, and time C. 6. Apply the basic terminology and definitions of epidemiology C. 7. Calculate basic epidemiology measures C. 9. Draw appropriate inference from epidemiologic data C. 10. Evaluate the strengths and limitations of epidemiologic reports ASPH INTERDISCIPLINARY/CROSS-CUTTING COMPETENCIES ADDRESSED F.1. [Communication and Informatics] Describe how the public health information infrastructure is used to collect, process, maintain, and disseminate data J.1. [Professionalism] Discuss sentinel events in the history and development of the public health profession and their relevance for practice in the field L.2. [Systems Thinking] Identify unintended consequences produced by changes made to a public health system This material was developed by the staff at the Global Tuberculosis Institute (GTBI), one of four Regional Training and Medical Consultation Centers funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It is published for learning purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproducibility of Mobile Auto Refractor Measurements in a Colombian Children Population
    CE Credit Case Report Reproducibility of Mobile Auto Refractor Measurements in a Colombian Children Population Diana Cristina Palencia Flórez, OD; María Alejandra Calderón Vera, OD; Diana Carolina Navarro Caicedo, OD; Yury Paola Muñoz Chávez, OD; Yerli Katherine García Hernández, OD Summary presented in the mentioned variables, reason for which it is Purpose: To Evaluate the inter-observer reproducibility of fundamental to make periodic evaluations, with the purpose of a mobile pediatric auto refractor in an infant Colombian identifying in a timely manner the appearance of ametropias population. Methodology: Quantitative longitudinal prospective that interfere in the process of emmetropization and generate study. Variables of age, sex, ocular history and refractive defect risk of amblyopia. were measured. The sample size was estimated assuming as values of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The In addition to the decreased irreversible visual acuity, descriptive statistical analysis of the variables was performed amblyopia is characterized by the effects on the quality of life and the ICC was calculated to evaluate the reproducibility of and the normal development of children, its prevalence varies the data taken independently by two examiners. Results: 138 between 1.39%1 to 5%2. According to several studies, refractive participants were included, median age was 42 months. 51% assessment at an early age and the identification of risk of the sample were females and hypermetropic astigmatism factors associated with amblyopia in a timely manner, followed was the prevalent refractive defect with a 67.39% occurrence. by appropriate treatment, constitute an effective strategy The ICC for sphere, cylinder and axis, showed an almost perfect to reduce the frequency and severity of visual impairment in degree of agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework to Assess Empirical Reproducibility in Biomedical Research Leslie D
    McIntosh et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology (2017) 17:143 DOI 10.1186/s12874-017-0377-6 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Repeat: a framework to assess empirical reproducibility in biomedical research Leslie D. McIntosh1, Anthony Juehne1*, Cynthia R. H. Vitale2, Xiaoyan Liu1, Rosalia Alcoser1, J. Christian Lukas1 and Bradley Evanoff3 Abstract Background: The reproducibility of research is essential to rigorous science, yet significant concerns of the reliability and verifiability of biomedical research have been recently highlighted. Ongoing efforts across several domains of science and policy are working to clarify the fundamental characteristics of reproducibility and to enhance the transparency and accessibility of research. Methods: The aim of the proceeding work is to develop an assessment tool operationalizing key concepts of research transparency in the biomedical domain, specifically for secondary biomedical data research using electronic health record data. The tool (RepeAT) was developed through a multi-phase process that involved coding and extracting recommendations and practices for improving reproducibility from publications and reports across the biomedical and statistical sciences, field testing the instrument, and refining variables. Results: RepeAT includes 119 unique variables grouped into five categories (research design and aim, database and data collection methods, data mining and data cleaning, data analysis, data sharing and documentation). Preliminary results in manually processing 40 scientific manuscripts indicate components of the proposed framework with strong inter-rater reliability, as well as directions for further research and refinement of RepeAT. Conclusions: The use of RepeAT may allow the biomedical community to have a better understanding of the current practices of research transparency and accessibility among principal investigators.
    [Show full text]
  • Augments Metabolism and Virulence Expression Factors in Acinetobacter Baumannii
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Cerebrospinal fuid (CSF) augments metabolism and virulence expression factors in Acinetobacter baumannii Jasmine Martinez1, Chelsea Razo‑Gutierrez1, Casin Le1, Robert Courville1, Camila Pimentel1, Christine Liu1, Sammie E. Fung1, Marisel R. Tuttobene1, Kimberly Phan1, Alejandro J. Vila2,3, Parvin Shahrestani1, Veronica Jimenez1, Marcelo E. Tolmasky1, Scott A. Becka4, Krisztina M. Papp‑Wallace4,5,6, Robert A. Bonomo4,5,6, Alfonso Soler‑Bistue7, Rodrigo Sieira8 & Maria Soledad Ramirez1* In a recent report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), multidrug resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii is a pathogen described as an “urgent threat.” Infection with this bacterium manifests as diferent diseases such as community and nosocomial pneumonia, bloodstream infections, endocarditis, infections of the urinary tract, wound infections, burn infections, skin and soft tissue infections, and meningitis. In particular, nosocomial meningitis, an unwelcome complication of neurosurgery caused by extensively‑drug resistant (XDR) A. baumannii, is extremely challenging to manage. Therefore, understanding how A. baumannii adapts to diferent host environments, such as cerebrospinal fuid (CSF) that may trigger changes in expression of virulence factors that are associated with the successful establishment and progress of this infection is necessary. The present in‑vitro work describes, the genetic changes that occur during A. baumannii infltration into CSF and displays A. baumannii’s expansive versatility to persist in a nutrient limited environment while enhancing several virulence factors to survive and persist. While a hypervirulent A. baumannii strain did not show changes in its transcriptome when incubated in the presence of CSF, a low‑virulence isolate showed signifcant diferences in gene expression and phenotypic traits.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence Based-Medicine: a Case Study of Vaccines and Autism Leah Liu Johnny Kung Alison Taylor Overview of Today’S Lecture
    Evidence Based-Medicine: A Case Study of Vaccines and Autism Leah Liu Johnny Kung Alison Taylor Overview of Today’s Lecture • Leah: Introduction to Evidence-based medicine • Johnny: Vaccines and Public Health • Alison: Autism and Vaccines Case Study Where do you obtain medical advice? The mice got I got better! better! Friend: Patient Testimonial Scientist: Laboratory Data My previous Best evidence: large study patient got better! with lots of people. 1,000 of us got better compared to a control! Doctor: Case Report http://www.openclipart.org/people/metalmarious/stethoscope.svg http://www.openclipart.org/detail/1761 What is evidence-based medicine (EBM)? • “the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about individual patients.” David Sackett, 1996. Patient rights Clinical Social context experienc e Scientific Peer method Review Hypothesis Testing Sackett DL, et al. BMJ 1996; 312 : 71, http://www.openclipart.org/people/papapishu/papapishu_Doctor_examining_a_patient.svg Evidence Based Medicine Throughout History • Bloodletting: withdrawing blood to treat disease, common for 2,000 years until 1800s Pierre Louis’ Bloodletting data, 1850 Died Total Mortality (%) Bled early 18 41 44% Bled late 9 36 25% Overall 27 77 35% http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blood_letting.jpg Doherty, S. Emergency Medicine Australasia. 2005. 17, 314–32 Evidence Based Medicine Throughout History • Scurvy: vitamin C deficiency characterized by bleeding gums, loss of teeth, spotty skin • Anecdotal evidence since 1500s for use of lemons and limes to treat scurvy James Lind’s Randomized Controlled Trial, 1747 Addition to Diet Observed Effect Quart of cider Minor improvement Unspecified elixir No change Sea water No change Garlic, mustard, horseradish No change Vinegar No change 2 oranges and 1 lemon Major improvement! http://www.openclipart.org/people/mystica/mystica_Pirate-ship.svg Doherty, S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evidence-Based Case Report: a Resource Pack for Chiropractors
    Clinical Chiropractic (2003) 6, 73—84 RESOURCE DOCUMENT The evidence-based case report: a resource pack for chiropractors Amanda R. Jones-Harris* Active Chiropractic Clinic, The Orchard Surgery, Baldock Road, Buntingford, Hertfordshire SG9 9DL, UK Received 3 February 2003; accepted 27 February 2003 Introduction a disparity develops between diagnostic skills and clinical judgement that increases with experience What is evidence-based medicine? and dating of academic knowledge resulting in a decline in clinical performance over time. EBM was Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is described as developed to help bridge this gap between research ‘‘...the conscientious, explicit and judicious use and practice. Recent advances in database search- of current best evidence in making decisions about ing and secondary sources of evidence, as well as the care of individual patients. The practice of improved access to them, have made the practice evidence-based medicine requires the integration of EBM a more viable option.2 of individual clinical expertise with the best avail- able external clinical evidence from systematic research.’’1 More recently, this definition has been Limitations of evidence-based medicine updated to incorporate patient values in the deci- sion process.2,3 These key elements of evidence- Three limitations are universal to medicine and based clinical decisions are depicted in Fig. 1. The science: the shortage of coherent, consistent evi- overall aim of EBM is to provide the best possible dence; the difficulty of applying evidence to indi- care for the individual patient. vidual patients and external barriers to the practice The integration of best research evidence, clin- of high quality medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Report Form “Anti-Influenza Therapy in Hospitalized Patients With
    Case Report Form “Anti-Influenza Therapy in Hospitalized patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia” January 2012 Principal Investigator: _________________ Hospital: ____________________ Subject Name: ___________________________________________ Medical Record Number: _____________________ Case # _______ January 2012 Page 1 of 19 DEMOGRAPHICS Sex: Age: ______________ Weight: __________ Height: ___________ Data collection form done: Ο Prospective Ο Retrospective Date of Arrival to Hospital: ______________ Time of Arrival to Hospital: ______________ Was the patient admitted to an intensive care unit on admission to the hospital? Ο Yes Ο No Did the patient need ventilatory support? Ο Invasive mechanical ventilation Ο Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (e.g. CPAP/Bilevel) Ο No Did the patient need blood pressure support? Ο Fluid resuscitation Ο Vasopressors Ο No Was the patient transferred to an intensive care unit during the hospitalization? Ο Yes Date: ___________ Ο No Date of Discharge from the ICU: ______________ Date of Discharge from the hospital: ______________ Abstractor: _________________________ • If you have any questions regarding data collection please e-mail your question to Paula Peyrani, MD at [email protected] Case # _______ January 2012 Page 2 of 19 1. DIAGNOSIS OF CAP Chest X-ray/CT scan within 24 hours of admission (CT scan overrides CXR findings) Date of x-ray ______________ Time of x-ray ______________ • New pulmonary infiltrate RUL RML RLL LUL LLL Unspecified location Cavitation Interstitial Bilateral Infiltrate Normal • Pleural effusion Ο None Ο Right Ο Left Ο Bilateral Date of CT scan ______________ Time of CT scan ______________ Ο Not done • New pulmonary infiltrate RUL RML RLL LUL LLL Unspecified location Cavitation Interstitial Bilateral Infiltrate Normal • Pleural effusion Ο None Ο Right Ο Left Ο Bilateral Criteria for diagnosis of CAP*: A.
    [Show full text]