DOCSLIB.ORG

Mid-Project Presentation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ComprehensiveComprehensive LakeLake InventoryInventory forfor thethe PleasantPleasant LakeLake ProtectiveProtective AssociationAssociation Mid-Project Presentation Colby-Sawyer College Institute for Community and Environment 20052005--20062006 CESCES ThirdThird YearYear ProjectProject TeamTeam Matt Urban Steve Hash Carly Rademaker Loey Kenna AgendaAgenda 6 Class Activities 6 What are Watersheds? 6 The Inventory Explained 6 A Typical Inventory Question 6 What is GIS? 6 Impervious Surface Experiment 6 Plans for the Future 6 Questions and Comments ClassClass ActivitiesActivities GettingGetting FamiliarFamiliar withwith thethe CommunityCommunity 6 Elkins Meeting 6 Getting to know the people of Elkins. Understanding their concerns and desires. 6 Hikes 6 Exploring the watershed, establishing a sense for our surroundings. 6 Kayaking 6 Having a look at the lake from a different perspective. Viewing the perimeter and inlets. ClassClass ActivitiesActivities LearningLearning aboutabout thethe SurroundingSurrounding EnvironmentEnvironment 6 Flora and Fauna 6 Identification of species within the watershed Example: 6 Red maple (Acer rubrum) 6 Black bear 6 Macro Invertebrates 6 Stream ecology- species collection process Example: 6 Stoneflies 6 Mayflies ClassClass ActivitiesActivities DataData CollectionCollection 6 Flow Measurement 6 Measured flow and conductivity at each inlet 6 Tidbits 6 Measuring the waters temperature at different depths and graphing the results. Observing the Lake’s turnover. 6 Tidbits were left in the water recording every five minutes for roughly 3 months. Tidbit Chart Tidbit Chart Temperature (C) 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 5 7 9 Date 9/14/2005 9/15/2005 9/15/2005 9/16/2005 9/17/2005 9/18/2005 9/18/2005 9/19/2005 9/20/2005 9/21/2005 9/21/2005 9/22/2005 9/23/2005 Date 9/24/2005 9/24/2005 9/25/2005 9/26/2005 9/27/2005 9/27/2005 9/28/2005 9/29/2005 9/30/2005 9/30/2005 10/1/2005 10/2/2005 10/3/2005 10/3/2005 Temperature (*C) (8 m) Temperature (*C) (2.5 m) Temperature (*C) (1 m) ClassClass ActivitiesActivities ExpandingExpanding ourour KnowledgeKnowledge 6 Hydrology 6 Michael Simpson from Antioch New England Graduate School gave a lecture and guided tour of nearby watershed of Lake Sunapee. 6 Providing insight to how the water flows within a watershed. 6 Impervious Surface Literature Reviews 6 Methodology 6 Storm-water management 6 Types of impervious surfaces 6 Impacts on wildlife WhatWhat isis aa Watershed?Watershed? Area of land which is not separated by political boundaries that contributes runoff into a common body of water Major Basin ­ Androscoggin River Pleasant Lake Watershed Upper Connecticut River Within The Upper Blackwater River Watershed Saco River Merrimack River Lower Connecticut River Sub-watershed Merrimack River ­ Sawyer Brook-Stocker Brook Eastman Frazier Brook Little Lake Sunapee Pleasant Lake Sunapee Lake Lake Sunapee Upper Blackwater River Lane River Upper Connecticut River ­ Wilmot Springfield New London WhyWhy isis WatershedWatershed ManagementManagement Important?Important? 6 Benefits the Community 6 Aesthetics 6 Historical preservation 6 Economics 6 Best practice development 6 Improves Environmental Health 6 Water quality 6 Biodiversity WatershedWatershed HistoryHistory 6 Shift in Thinking 6 Natural verses political boundaries 6 Importance of environmental issues 6 Citizen education and action 6 Land use and connectivity 6 Pleasant Lake Protective Association (1969) 6 Our partner in completing the Inventory TheThe InventoryInventory ExplainedExplained 6 Major Goals 6 Establishes baseline information 6 Provides standardized methods 6 Creates starting point for future management plans CategoriesCategories 6 The Inventory has three main categories... 6 Recreational Value 6 Water clarity, restrictions, shoreline features 6 Unique or Outstanding Value 6 Unique/scenic features, habitat, open space 6 Susceptibility to Impairment 6 Shallow depth, exotic species, excessive recreation AttributesAttributes 6 …and ten attributes: 6 Recreational 6 Geographical, Spatial, Characteristics and Demographic 6 Restrictions or Information Prohibited Uses 6 Physical Waterbody 6 Unique Characteristics Characteristics 6 Shoreland Characteristics 6 Water Quality Characteristics 6 Watershed Characteristics 6 Biological/Ecological 6 Visual/Aesthetic Characteristics Characteristics ScoringScoring 6 Recreational Value 6 Ranked 1 – 5, with 1 being the lowest level of recreational value and 5 the highest 6 Unique or Outstanding Value 6 Ranked 1 – 5, with 1 being the least unique or outstanding value and 5 the most. 6 Susceptibility to Impairment 6 Ranked 1 – 5, with 1 being the lowest level of susceptibility and 5 being the highest. AA TypicalTypical InventoryInventory QuestionQuestion ATTRIBUTE 2. PHYSICAL WATERBODY CHARACTERISTICS Question A. Surface water area. Directions – The New Hampshire Lakes and Ponds Inventory provides the best and most comprehensive source of information to answer this and many of the other questions for this section. The user(s) should contact NH DES Watershed Management Bureau to obtain a copy that has the most recent information for the waterbody. Rationale – Surface water area is an important consideration when developing a management plan, as larger waterbodies will often require more complex strategies and innovative solutions for long-term protection or restoration of its natural resources. Also, it is important recognize the waterbody’s relative size as compared to other New Hampshire lakes and ponds. AA TypicalTypical InventoryInventory QuestionQuestion Evaluation Comments, Actual Evaluation Criteria Rec. Out. Sus. Question Values or Computations A) Surface 1) 10 – 50 acres 1 water area 2) 51 – 100 acres 2 (acres 3) 101 – 250 acres 3 excluding wetlands) Source of information 4) 251 – 1,000 acres 4 and date of survey: 5) > 1,000 acres 5 6 One question may have fall into two evaluation categories Evaluation Comments, Actual Evaluation Criteria Rec. Out. Sus. Question Values or Computations A) Total 1) < 100,000 people 1 1 resident 2) 100,000 – 250,000 2 2 population 3) 250,000 – 500,000 3 3 w/in 30 mile radius Source of information 4) 500,000 – 1,000,000 4 4 and date of survey: 5) > 1,000,000 people 5 5 TheThe WriteWrite -- UpUp Process Followed: Consulted the New Hampshire Lakes and Ponds Inventory Lake Trophic Data for Pleasant Lake. Finding and Analysis: The surface area of Pleasant Lake is 605.90 acres. Evaluation Criteria: Score: 1.) 10 – 50 acres 1 2.) 51 – 100 acres 2 3.) 101 – 250 acres 3 4.) 251 – 1,000 acres 4 5.) >1,000 acres 5 Sources: New Hampshire Lakes and Ponds Inventory, Pleasant Lake. Lake Trophic Data. Department of Environmental Services, 1997. Assessment of Question: This question is adequate as stated. MapMap ExampleExample WaterbodyWaterbody Location Location in State Attribute 1: Question A ­ 6 Some questions may require a map which will appear immediately after the write-up in the inventory Miles 024 Legend Pleasant Lake New London Boundary Digital data in NH GRANIT represent the efforts of the contributing agencies to record information from the cited source materials. Complex Systems Research Center (CSRC), under contract to the Office of State Planning (OSP), and in consultation with cooperating agencies, maintains a continuing program to identify and correct errorsi in these data. Neither OSP nor CSRC make any claim as to the validity or to any implied uses of these data. WhatWhat isis GIS?GIS? 6 GIS = Geographic Information System 6 A system for 6 Capturing 6 Managing 6 Manipulating 6 Displaying 6 and Analyzing…Spatial Data 6 Data is input in layers, which can be overlaid or joined GISGIS 6 We are using GIS to address many questions in the inventory: 6 Shoreland/Watershed development and land use. 6 Shoreland/Watershed ownership. 6 Protected lands within shoreland/watershed. 6 Shoreland/Watershed topography (slope). 6 Shoreland/Watershed geology and soils. 6 Percents of impervious surface with the shoreland/watershed. GISGIS 6 We are using GIS to address many questions in the inventory: 6 Shoreland/Watershed development and land use. 6 Shoreland/Watershed ownership. 6 Protected lands within shoreland/watershed. 6 Shoreland/Watershed topography (slope). 6 Shoreland/Watershed geology and soils. 6 Percents of impervious surface with the shoreland/watershed. Pleasant Lake Pleasant Lake 250 ft. Buffer Pleasant Lake 250 ft. Buffer Buildings Pleasant Lake 250 ft. Buffer Buldings ImperviousImpervious SurfacesSurfaces 6 Defined: 6 “Any material that prevents the infiltration of water into the soil” (Arnold & Gibbons 243) 6 Parking lots, lawns, roofs, roads, etc… 6 Associated problems 6 Non-point source polluter 6 Potential to increase turbidity, conductivity, pH 6 Decline in infiltration/percolation 6 Impact wildlife ThresholdThreshold ofof DegradationDegradation % Impervious Surface Waterbody Status Less than 10 percent Protected 10-30 percent Initial degradation/Impacted Greater than 30 percent Heavily degraded Brabec, Elizabeth, Stacey Schulte, and Paul L. Richards. "Impervious Surfaces and Water Quality: A Review of Current Literature and Its implications for Watershed Planning." Journal of Planning Literature May 2002 OurOur ExperimentExperiment 6 Percent imperviousness 6 The role of slope on an impervious surface 6 Data collection 6 Materials/Methodologies PlansPlans forfor NextNext SemesterSemester 6 Finalizing the Inventory 6 Impervious Surface experiment and analysis 6 Rate of development 6 Bringing Together all the Information 6 Final assessment of Pleasant Lake Watershed 6 Communicating Findings 6 Final presentation in May 6 Published project portfolio Questions? The Third Year Project Team would like to thank the members of the Pleasant Lake Protective Association for their help and input. Special thanks to Kittie Wilson for all of her assistance with our project..
Recommended publications
  • “Whose Woods These Arei Think I Know”

    “Whose Woods These Arei Think I Know”

    THE AUSBON SARGENT LAND PRESERVATION TRUST THEHelping AUSBON to Preserve SARGENT the Rural Landscape LAND of the PRESERVATION Mt. Kearsarge/Lake Sunapee TRUST Region Andover, Bradford, Danbury, Goshen, Grantham, New London, Newbury, Springfield, Sunapee, Sutton, Warner & Wilmot Helping to Preserve the Rural Landscape of the Mt. Kearsarge/Ragged/Lake Sunapee Region Andover, Bradford, Danbury, Goshen, Grantham, New London, Newbury, Springfield, Sunapee, Sutton, Warner & Wilmot WinterWinter 2018 2013 Photo by Grounds staff Conservation PARTNERSHIPS The Battles Farm Conservation Alliance Stewardship • Saving Land for Tomorrow “Whose woods these are I think I know” From the Executive Director: CONGRATULATIONS, DEBBIE Ausbon Sargent is pleased to announce that Debbie Stanley During my 30 years at Ausbon Sargent, was voted as the 2018 – 2021 Terrafirma Members Committee one of the biggest changes I’ve witnessed is the representative for the Northern New England region (Maine, increase in the number of people discovering New Hampshire, Vermont). the outdoors. For many years, whenever I went to Clark Lookout, it was rare if I’d see anyone Terrafirma is a tax-exempt conservation defense liability enjoying this local gem. Now I just smile as I see families hiking up insurance service. Its mission is to protect the permanence the ½-mile trail to be rewarded with a fabulous view of Lake Sunapee of land conservation by funding the legal costs of defending and beyond. conservation easements and preserve properties from violations or legal challenges. Although Ausbon Sargent has Each town has wonderful conservation properties to explore. an Enforcement Fund that supports the legal defense of our Consider visiting the Bradford Bog, Sunapee’s Webb Forest Preserve, conservation properties, we also feel that insurance provides the King Hill Reservation and many more special places.
  • Official List of Public Waters

    Official List of Public Waters

    Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area).
  • Discovery Meeting Contoocook Watershed December 12, 2018 Hopkinton, NH 10:00 AM – 12:00 Noon Peterborough, NH 2:00 PM – 4:00 PM Meeting Agenda

    Discovery Meeting Contoocook Watershed December 12, 2018 Hopkinton, NH 10:00 AM – 12:00 Noon Peterborough, NH 2:00 PM – 4:00 PM Meeting Agenda

    Discovery Meeting Contoocook Watershed December 12, 2018 Hopkinton, NH 10:00 AM – 12:00 Noon Peterborough, NH 2:00 PM – 4:00 PM Meeting Agenda ▸ Welcome and Introductions • Risk MAP Project Team • Community officials and State partners • Other Federal Agencies partner representatives • Associations • Others ▸ Brief Overview of Risk MAP & Discovery ▸ Watershed Snapshot & Prioritization ▸ Looking Forward – Engineering Analysis ▸ Regulatory and Non-Regulatory Products ▸ Breakout Session and Interactive Discussions 1 Overview Risk MAP & Discovery 2 What is Risk MAP? . Five year effort to modernize maps . Collaborative approach . Result: digital flood data and digital maps . Goals: quality data, public awareness, action for 92% of population that reduces risk . Improved flood data quality . Watershed-oriented . Limited up-front coordination . Focus on up-front coordination . Scoping not mandatory . Discovery is mandatory 3 Modernization in the Contoocook Watershed Modernized Counties (Cheshire, NH, Hillsborough, NH, Merrimack, NH, Sullivan, NH) 4 Modernization in the Contoocook Watershed Modernized Counties5 (Cheshire, NH, Hillsborough, NH, Merrimack, NH, Sullivan, NH) What is the value of Risk MAP? Through collaboration with State, Local, and Tribal entities, Risk Mapping and Planning (Risk MAP) will deliver quality data that increases public awareness and leads to action that reduces risk to life and property 6 Discovery Discovery is the process of data mining, collection, and analysis with the goal of conducting a comprehensive watershed study and initiating communication and mitigation planning discussions with the communities in the watershed When . After an area/watershed has been prioritized . Before a Risk MAP project scope is finalized Why . Increases visibility of flood risk information, . Increases education and involvement of communities Potential Next Steps .
  • Spring 2015 Vol. 34 No. 1

    Spring 2015 Vol. 34 No. 1

    New Hampshire Bird Records Spring 2015 Vol. 34, No. 1 IN HONOR OF David Donsker his issue of New Hampshire TBird Records with its color NEW HAMPSHIRE BIRD RECORDS cover is sponsored by friends of VOLUME 34, NUMBER 1 David Donsker in honor of his SPRING 2015 well-deserved receipt of the 2015 MANAGING EDITOR Goodhue-Elkins Award (see page Rebecca Suomala 2) and his many contributions 603-224-9909 X309, [email protected] to New Hampshire Bird Records. Congratulations, David! TEXT EDITOR Dan Hubbard David Donsker birding in Monaco. Photo by Terri Donsker. SEASON EDITORS Eric Masterson, Spring Tony Vazzano, Summer Lauren Kras/Ben Griffith, Fall Pamela Hunt, Winter In This Issue LAYOUT From the Editor ........................................................................................................................1 Kathy McBride Photo Quiz ...............................................................................................................................1 ASSISTANTS 2015 Goodhue-Elkins Award – David Donsker ........................................................................2 Jeannine Ayer, Zeke Cornell, David Deifik, Spring Season: March 1 through May 31, 2015 ........................................................................3 Kathryn Frieden, Elizabeth Levy, by Eric Masterson Susan MacLeod, Marie Nickerson, Field Trip Reports Carol Plato, Tony Vazzano, Phyllis Yaffie Dancing Woodcocks by Brynlee Kimball .........................................................................26 FIELD NOTES Connecticut River
  • Guide to NH Timber Harvesting Laws

    Guide to NH Timber Harvesting Laws

    Guide to New Hampshire Timber Harvesting Laws ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This publication is an updated and revised edition prepared by: Sarah Smith, Extension Professor/Specialist, Forest Industry, UNH Cooperative Extension Debra Anderson, Administrative Assistant, UNH Cooperative Extension We wish to thank the following for their review of this publication: Dennis Thorell, NH Department of Revenue Administration JB Cullen, NH Division of Forests and Lands Karen P. Bennett, UNH Cooperative Extension Bryan Nowell, NH Division of Forests and Lands Hunter Carbee, NH Timberland Owners Association, NH Timber Harvesting Council Sandy Crystal, Vanessa Burns, and Linda Magoon, NH Dept. of Environmental Services University of New Hampshire Cooperative Extension 131 Main Street, Nesmith Hall Durham, New Hampshire 03824 http://ceinfo.unh.edu NH Division of Forests and Lands PO Box 1856, 172 Pembroke Rd. Concord, NH 03302-1856 http://www.dred.state.nh.us/forlands New Hampshire Timberland Owners Association 54 Portsmouth Street Concord, New Hampshire 03301 www.nhtoa.org UNH Cooperative Extension programs and policies are consistent with pertinent Federal and State laws and regulations on non-discrimination regarding race, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, age, handicap or veteran’s status. College of Life Sciences and Agriculture, County Governments, NH Department of Resources and Economic Development, NH Fish and Game, USDA and US Fish and Wildlife Service cooperating. Funding was provided by: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Economic Action Program Cover photo: Claude Marquis, Kel-Log Inc., works on the ice-damaged Gorham Town Forest August 2004 Table of Contents New Hampshire’s Working Forest ......................................................................................2 Introduction to Forestry Laws ............................................................................................4 Current Use Law .................................................................................................................
  • Lake Level Management a Balancing Act Nh Lakes

    Lake Level Management a Balancing Act Nh Lakes

    LAKE LEVEL MANAGEMENT A BALANCING ACT NH LAKES June 16, 2021 James W. Gallagher, Jr., P.E Chief Engineer Dam Bureau 271-1961 [email protected] State Dams Hazard Classification AGENCY TOTALS HIGH SIG. LOW NM DES 40 25 40 6 111 NHFG 4 6 43 47 100 DNCR 2 3 9 17 31 DOT 1 4 4 18 27 UNH 1 1 0 3 5 Glencliff 0 0 0 2 2 Veterans Home 0 0 0 2 2 TOTAL 48 39 96 95 278 Recreational Resources Ossipee Lake Squam Lake Newfound Lake Lake Winnipesaukee Winnisquam Lake Lake Sunapeee Emergency Action Plans Inundation Mapping Population At Risk Downstream of State Owned High and Significant Hazard Dams More than 4,000 houses More than 130 State Road Crossings More than 800 Town Road Crossings Dam Operations Emergency Operations Remote Dam Operations DEPTH (in feet) LAKE RIVER TOWN START DATE FROM FULL Angle Pond Bartlett Brook Sandown Oct. 13 2’ Akers Pond Greenough Brook Errol Oct. 13 1’ Ayers Lake Tributary to Isinglass River Barrington Oct. 20 3’ Ballard Pond Taylor Brook Derry Oct. 13 2’ Barnstead Parade Suncook River Barnstead Oct. 13 1.5’ Bow Lake Isinglass River Strafford Oct. 13 4’ Buck Street Suncook River East Pembroke Oct. 13 6’ Bunker Pond Lamprey River Epping Oct. 13 2’ Burns Lake Tributary to Johns River Whitefield Oct. 13 1.5’ Chesham Pond Minnewawa Brook Harrisville Oct. 13 2’ Crystal Lake Crystal Lake Brook Enfield Oct. 13 4’ Crystal Lake Suncook River Gilmanton Oct. 13 3’ Deering Reservoir1 Piscataquog River Deering Oct.
  • Nomination of the Warner River.Pdf

    Nomination of the Warner River.Pdf

    Nomination of the Warner River to the New Hampshire Rivers Management and Protection Program Autumn at the Headwaters: Confluence of the West Branch and Andrew Brook, Bradford. Photo Credit: Scott MacLean Submitted by the Warner River Nomination Committee With assistance from the Central New Hampshire Regional Planning Commission Warner River Nomination Page 1 Table of Contents I. NOMINATION INFORMATION .......................................................................................................................... 4 II. SUMMARY: RESOURCES OF STATEWIDE OR LOCAL SIGNIFICANCE .............................................. 4 III. COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC SUPPORT ......................................................................................................... 9 IV. OTHER SUPPORTING INFORMATION ....................................................................................................... 11 V. RIVER CLASSIFICATIONS .............................................................................................................................. 12 1. RIVER SEGMENT CRITERIA .................................................................................................................................. 13 2. RIVER SEGMENTS ................................................................................................................................................ 14 VI. MAPS ..................................................................................................................................................................
  • Draft Warner River Corridor Management Plan

    Draft Warner River Corridor Management Plan

    | Version Date 12-16-20, CNHRPC | Warner River Corridor Management Plan March 2020 Winter comes to the Warner River, near Morse Loop in Warner. Photo Credit: Ken Milender of Warner New Hampshire Rivers Management and Protection Program Department of Environmental Services Watershed Management Bureau R-WD-20-25 Warner River Corridor Management Plan Prepared by Warner River Local Advisory Committee (WRLAC) with assistance from the Central New Hampshire Regional Planning Commission (CNHRPC) New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division – Watershed Management Bureau 29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95 | Concord, NH 03302-0095 | (603) 271-3449 Robert R. Scott Commissioner Clark Freise Assistant Commissioner Eugene Forbes, P.E. Water Division Director Tracie Sales Rivers and Lakes Programs Manager https://www.des.nh.gov/ Warner River Corridor Management Plan 2020 Acknowledgments The Warner River Local Advisory Committee (WRLAC) prepared this Warner River Corridor Management Plan with assistance from the Central New Hampshire Regional Planning Commission and the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NHDES) Rivers Management and Protection Program (RMMP). The draft of this Plan was completed in March 2020. Members of the Warner River Local Advisory Committee are: • Bradford: Bruce Edwards, Scott MacLean. • Hopkinton: Dave White, Mike Norris, Linden Rayton. • Sutton: Bob Wright, Pete Savickas, Andy Jeffrey. • Warner: Laura Russell, Chris Spannweitz, Ken Milender. • Webster: Susan Roman, Dan Moran. Special acknowledgements
  • Town of Warner, NH Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2019

    Town of Warner, NH Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2019

    2018 Jan- Flooding and Ice Jam of Bagley Field (Photo by Apryl Blood) 2018 May- EF-1 Tornado Damage on Couchtown Road (Photo from Concord Monitor, May 16) Adopted by the Warner Board of Selectmen June 11, 2019 NHHSEM/FEMA Approved June 25, 2019 Selectmen Adopted June 11, 2019 NHHSEM/FEMA Approved June 25, 2019 Town of Warner 5 East Main Street Warner, NH 03278 Phone: (603) 456-2298 www.warner.nh.us Central NH Regional Planning Commission (CNHRPC) 28 Commercial Street, Suite 3 Concord, NH 03301 Phone: (603) 226-6020 www.cnhrpc.org NH Department of Safety (NHDOS) NH Homeland Security and Emergency Management (NHHSEM) 33 Hazen Drive Concord, NH 03305 (Mailing Address) Incident Planning and Operations Center (IPOC) 110 Smokey Bear Blvd Concord, NH 03301 (Physical Address) Phone: (800) 852-3792 or (603) 271-2231 www.nh.gov/safety/divisions/hsem https://apps.nh.gov/blogs/hsem US Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 99 High Street, Sixth Floor Boston, Massachusetts 02110 Phone: (617) 223-9540 www.fema.gov From: Hazard Mitigation Planning To: Stephanie Alexander; "[email protected]"; "[email protected]"; "[email protected]" Cc: Chase, Julia; Monastiero, Alexxandre Subject: Warner, NH - Approvable Pending Adoption Date: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 1:08:43 PM Good afternoon! The Department of Safety, Division of Homeland Security & Emergency Management (HSEM) has completed its review of the Warner, NH Hazard Mitigation Plan and found it approvable pending adoption. Congratulations on a job well done! With this approval, the jurisdiction meets the local mitigation planning requirements under 44 CFR 201 pending HSEM’s receipt of electronic copies of the adoption documentation and the final plan.
  • Notes from Fish Community Assessments and a Plan to Protect Wild Brook Trout Populations and Their Habitats Within the Warner River Watershed

    Notes from Fish Community Assessments and a Plan to Protect Wild Brook Trout Populations and Their Habitats Within the Warner River Watershed

    Notes from Fish Community Assessments and a Plan to Protect Wild Brook Trout Populations and their Habitats within the Warner River Watershed New Hampshire Fish and Game Department Basil W. Woods, Jr. Trout Unlimited Chapter Forward This document summarizes the ongoing efforts, results, and recommendations to protect wild brook trout populations within the Warner River Watershed. This summary would not be possible without the countless hours of time donated by volunteers from the town of Warner and the Basil W. Woods, Jr. Chapter of Trout Unlimited. The New Hampshire Fish and Game Department is extremely appreciative of the time spent and interest shown by these dedicated supporters. Because a localized collection of conscientious supporters continue to be active participants with these efforts, the information provided in the document is expected to have a high level of significance. It is important to note that this report should not be considered complete. As more data is collected, more opportunities to restore and protect wild brook trout habitat will become available. This will remain a working document, being updated and added to as needed. Introduction The many streams that comprise the Lower Warner River Watershed (2012) and the Lane River Watershed (2013) were surveyed by the New Hampshire Fish and Game Department, Basil W. Woods Jr. Trout Unlimited Chapter, Warner Conservation Commission and others interested with aquatic ecosystems in the area. These watersheds are two of the four watersheds that comprise the overall Warner River Watershed. These surveys were part of a statewide effort to quantify the presence of self-sustaining brook trout ( Salvelinus fontinalis ) populations at the 12 digit hydrologic unit watershed code level (HUC12) and to gather preliminary information on their habitat while providing information on the region’s general fish community.
  • Trout-Stocking-Summary-2020.Pdf

    Trout-Stocking-Summary-2020.Pdf

    NH FISH AND GAME DEPARTMENT - INLAND FISHERIES DIVISION FRESHWATER STOCKING SUMMARY BY WATERBODY: 1/1/2020-12/31/2020 WATERBODY TOWN SPECIES SIZE NUMBER ACADEMY BROOK LOUDON EBT 1+YR 350 AIRPORT POND WHITEFIELD EBT 1+YR 1,200 WHITEFIELD EBT 2+YR 210 AKERS POND ERROL RT 1+YR 4,000 ERROL RT 2+YR 500 AMMONOOSUC RIVER BATH BT 1+YR 3,794 BATH EBT 1+YR 1,000 BATH EBT 2+YR 184 BATH RT 1+YR 1,230 BETHLEHEM BT 1+YR 1,108 BETHLEHEM EBT 1+YR 1,600 BETHLEHEM RT 1+YR 1,000 CARROLL EBT 1+YR 7,625 CARROLL EBT 2+YR 397 CARROLL RT 1+YR 9,185 LISBON BT 1+YR 2,500 LISBON EBT 1+YR 200 LISBON RT 1+YR 1,500 LITTLETON BT 1+YR 300 LITTLETON EBT 1+YR 400 LITTLETON RT 1+YR 500 AMMONOOSUC RIVER, UPPER BERLIN BT 1+YR 200 BERLIN EBT 1+YR 2,000 MILAN BT 1+YR 800 MILAN EBT 1+YR 500 NORTHUMBERLAND BT 1+YR 800 NORTHUMBERLAND EBT 1+YR 400 STARK BT 1+YR 1,724 STARK EBT 1+YR 2,600 AMMONOOSUC RIVER, WILD BATH EBT 1+YR 1,700 BATH EBT 2+YR 30 ANDREW BROOK NEWBURY EBT 1+YR 200 ANDROSCOGGIN RIVER BERLIN BT 1+YR 2,000 BERLIN EBT 1+YR 8,654 BERLIN EBT 2+YR 500 BERLIN RT 1+YR 2,500 CAMBRIDGE BT 1+YR 1,000 CAMBRIDGE EBT 1+YR 4,254 CAMBRIDGE EBT 2+YR 200 CAMBRIDGE RT 1+YR 1,500 WATERBODY TOWN SPECIES SIZE NUMBER ANDROSCOGGIN RIVER DUMMER BT 1+YR 1,000 DUMMER EBT 1+YR 4,254 DUMMER EBT 2+YR 1,185 DUMMER RT 1+YR 2,000 ERROL BT 1+YR 1,184 ERROL EBT 1+YR 5,254 ERROL EBT 2+YR 300 ERROL EBT 3+YR 200 ERROL RT 1+YR 6,500 MILAN BT 1+YR 3,023 MILAN EBT 1+YR 5,054 MILAN EBT 2+YR 500 MILAN RT 1+YR 2,500 ARCHERY POND ALLENSTOWN EBT 1+YR 1,600 ALLENSTOWN EBT 2+YR 50 ALLENSTOWN RT 1+YR 250 ARMINGTON
  • Surficial Geology of the Bradford, NH 7.5-Minute Quadrangle

    Surficial Geology of the Bradford, NH 7.5-Minute Quadrangle

    Surficial Geology of the Bradford, NH 7.5-minute Quadrangle Gregory A. Barker and Joshua A. Keeley New Hampshire Geological Survey Surficial geology mapped during the 2017-2018 field season Geologic History New Hampshire has been subject to multiple ice ages, but only evidence of the most recent one, the Wisconsin Glaciation and the Laurentide ice sheet, is well preserved in the glacial sediments and landforms that were left behind as the ice melted. The Laurentide Glacier generally advanced into the area from the northwest to the southeast. The ice was at least 2000 meters thick through much of the region, covering even the highest summits (Bierman et al. 2015), and the weight of the ice and its slow but constant motion led to significant erosion of the pre-glacial landscape. Stoss and lee topography is common in many glaciated landscapes, where the leading, up-ice (stoss) side of a hill has a gentler slope while the down-ice side (lee) is much steeper resulting from plucking or erosion by the ice. Photograph 1 shows a bedrock striation or a gouge across the bedrock surface, an indicator that the ice sheet passed over this area of New Hampshire. Beginning around 14,500 years ago, the area began to become ice free as the glacier both retreated and thinned (Hodgson and Licciardi 2016) exposing the summit of nearby Mt. Cardigan to solar radiation. The high summit of Mount Kearsarge likely caused ice to stagnate and downwaste against its northwestern edge. In this scenario, ice front positions were controlled by pre-existing bedrock controls and not by climatic conditions (Caldwell 1978).