Risk Management & Trading Conference

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Risk Management & Trading Conference RiskMathics, aware that the most important factors to develop and consolidate the Financial WHO SHOULD ATTEND? Markets are training and promoting a high level financial culture, will host for the third time in The Risk Management & Trading Conference is aim at Practitioners directly or indirectly involved Mexico: “The Risk Management & Trading Conference”, which will have the participation of in areas of trading, risk management, regulation, technology, and research & development of leading authorities who have key roles in the global financial industry. Stock Exchanges, Brokers, Brokerage Houses, Banks, Institutional Investors (Pension Funds, OBJECTIVES Mutual Funds, Insurance Companies, etc.), Hedge Funds, and Independent Investors. One of the primary objectives of this Conference is to provide through Workshops, Presentations It will be of particular relevance to: and Round Table Discussions the latest advances in Risk Management, Trading, Technology • Chief Executive Officers of financial institutions and intermediaries and Market Regulation, and to transmit all this knowledge by local and international authorities • Traders in the field. • Risk Managers Some other objectives of this Conference are to explain and show in detail the current • Consultants situation and where the Global Financial Industry is heading, advances in Pricing, and how • Regulators intermediaries and direct or indirect participants of markets need to be prepared to remain • Technology managers and staff competitive in spite of the new challenges and paradigms that are present nowadays. • Analysts, Developers and Vendors of Front Office Trading Software • Quants • Scholars/Academics • In general, any Practitioner involved in Trading, Risk and/or Finance RISK MANAGEMENT WORKSHOPS FINANCIAL CORRELATIONS – MODELS, TRADING, AND RISK-MANAGEMENT INCLUDES RISK AGGREGATION RISK APPETITE COUNTERPARTY CREDIT RISK & LIQUIDITY RISK THE BASEL III Correlation RISK & CVA REGULATION FRAMEWORK Gunter Meissner Carlos Vallebueno John Gustavo Fuertes Jon Gregory John Hull Suresh Sankaran President of Derivatives Software Tesorero PriceWaterhouse Soldevilla Solum Financial Managing Director & CEO Cassandra Capital Corporativo Toronto University Coopers GE Capital Partners LLP Kamakura Corporation Management Banamex-CITI SYSTEMIC AND SOVEREIGN RISK CURRENT CONDITIONS AND CORPORATE CREDIT SCORING OUTLOOK FOR GLOBAL MARKET RISK OPERATIONAL RISK MODELS AND PREDICTING CORPORATE AND SOVEREIGN SOLVENCY CORPORATE CRISIS CREDIT MARKETS Edward Altman Marcelo G. Cruz José Diego Jordi Santiago Stern School of Rafael García Gerardo Zamudio Global Head Alarcón Payés Carrillo Business New York Asset Manager Morgan Serfiex QRR Serfiex Serfiex Stanley University (NYU) TRADING AND QUANTITATIVE FINANCE WORKSHOPS TRADING Quantitative DISPERSION FIXED INCOME: LOW-FREQUENCY MODELS FOR STATISTICAL STRATEGIES AND COMPUTATIONAL FINANCE FOR TRADING & TRADERS IN A ARBITRAGING, ARBITRAGE RELATIVE VALUE QUANTS ARBITRAGING HIGH- FREQUENCY HEDGING, TRADING VOLATILTY FOR OPTIONS AND THE YIELD WORLD: A TRADING & RISK SWAPS CURVE Survival GUIDE MANAGEMENT Marco Avellaneda Rohan Rao José Alatorre Marco Avellaneda Emanuel Derman Izzy Nelken Emanuel Derman Marcos López De Prado Estructuración Courant Institute of Courant Institute of Columbia Georgia Institute Columbia University Mathematical Sciences, Mathematical Sciences, NYU Oscar Sierra Presidente y Fundador Senior Managing Director Paul Wilmott de Commodities and Senior Partner, Finance University-Former of Technology Super Computer Guggenheim Partners Americas Former Goldman NYU and Senior Partner, Goldman Sachs Consulting Barclays Capital Sachs Finance Concepts LLC Concepts LLC (Georgia Tech) NY ASSET AND TREASURY MANAGEMENT WORKSHOPS HEDGE FUNDS RISK MANAGEMENT (MANAGING AND TREASURY MANAGEMENT INVESTING IN A HEDGE FUND) Luis Seco Marcos López De Prado Suresh Sankaran Sigma Analysis & Senior Managing Director Managing Director Kamakura Management Ltd Guggenheim Partners Corporation REGULATION DODD FRANK - EMIR: THE CHALLENGES OF SWAP DEALERS, CENTRAL GIPS® GLOBAL BASEL III. DEVELOPMENT COUNTERPARTIES, EXECUTION FACILITIES, TRADE REPOSITORIES AND INVESTMENT IFRS 9 (International FINANCIAL AND IMPLEMENTATION PERFORMANCE REPORTING Standard ) END USERS TRADING SWAPS INTERNATIONALLY Standards Heleodoro Abraham Ron Filler Gary DeWaal Elizabeth Ritter Antonio Carlos Orta Erick Morales Nicolás Olea Ruiz Izquierdo Chief of Staff and Senior Villarreal CNBV New York Law President Gary DeWaal and Counsel at Commodity Futures KPMG KPMG Banorte-IXE Scotiabank School Associates LLC Trading Commission (CFTC) KPMG panel SEMINAR WORKSHOP WORKSHOP CONFERENCE AGENDA DAY 1 WEDNESDAY, JUNE 18TH, 2014 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM Registration Conference Breakfast: John Hull 8:00 AM - 9:30 AM THE FUTURE OF DERIVATIVES TRADING (Plenary Hall) ROOM 1 ROOM 2 ROOM 3 ROOM 4 ROOM 5 ROOM 6 ROOM 7 Plenary Hall WORKSHOP WORKSHOP WORKSHOP WORKSHOP WORKSHOP CREDIT RISK, COUNTERPARTY TREASURY COMPUTATIONAL TRADING RISK MARKET RISK & CVA MANAGEMENT FINANCE FOR VOLATILITY APPETITE RISK AND 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM Jon Gregory QUANTS REGULATION Solum Financial Suresh Sankaran José Alatorre Gustavo Fuertes John Hull Partners LLP Managing Director Oscar Sierra Estructuración de PricewaterhouseCoopers (Part I) Kamakura Corporation (Part I) Commodities Américas (PWC) Toronto University (Part I) Barclays Capital NY (Part I) (Part I) (Part I) 12:00 PM - 12:30 PM BREAK CREDIT RISK, WORKSHOP TREASURY COMPUTATIONAL TRADING RISK MARKET 12:30 PM - 2:30 PM COUNTERPARTY MANAGEMENT FINANCE FOR VOLATILITY APPETITE RISK AND RISK & CVA (Continue Part I) QUANTS (Continue Part I) (Continue Part I) REGULATION (Continue Part I) (Continue Part I) (Continue Part I) 2:30 PM - 4:00 PM FREE LUNCH WORKSHOP TREASURY COMPUTATIONAL TRADING WORKSHOP RISK WORKSHOP CREDIT RISK, COUNTERPARTY MANAGEMENT FINANCE FOR VOLATILITY FIXED INCOME: APPETITE REGULACIÓN: MARKET RISK & CVA (Continue Part I) QUANTS (Continue Part I) TRADING & (Continue Part I) DODD FRANK Y EMIR: RISK AND 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM (Continue Part I) (Continue Part I) ARBITRAGING THE CHALLENGES REGULATION THE YIELD OF SWAP DEALERS, (Continue Part I) CURVE CENTRAL COUNTERPARTIES, Izzy Nelken EXECUTION FACILITIES, Presidente y Fundador TRADE REPOSITORIES Super Computer Consulting AND END USERS (Part I) TRADING SWAPS INTERNATIONALLY Gary DeWaal 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM Presidente Gary DeWaal and Associates LLC Ron Filler New York Law School Elizabeth Ritter Chief of Staff and Senior Counsel at Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) WORKSHOP WORKSHOP WORKSHOP WORKSHOP (Part I) SolvencY BASEL III. GLOBAL 6:00 PM - 7:00 PM OPERATIONAL DEVELOPMENT RISK José Diego Alarcón INVESTMENT SERFIEX AND PERFORMANCE (Part I) IMPLEMENTATION Santiago Carrillo Standards ® QRR Carlos Orta (GIPS ) (Part I) Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores Erick Morales (CNBV) (Part I) KPMG 7:00 PM - 8:00 PM (Part I) 8:00 PM - 8:15 PM BREAK BASEL III. GLOBAL SCHEDULE: 8:15 PM - 9:00 PM OPERATIONAL SOLVENCY FIXED INCOME: PANEL: REGulatory RISK (Continue Parte I) DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT TRADING & AND STRUCTURE (Continue Parte I) AND PERFORMANCE ARBITRAGING IMPLEMENTATION Standards MARKET TRENDS 8:15 PM - 10:00 PM ® THE YIELD (Continue Parte I) (GIPS ) CURVE IN THE GLOBAL (Continue Parte I) (Continue Parte I) MARKETS Ron Filler, Gary DeWaal, John Hull, Sandy Frucher and Elizabeth Ritter AGENDA DAY 2 Thursday, JUNE 19TH, 2014 Conference Breakfast: Edward Altman 8:00 AM - 9:30 AM SYSTEMIC AND SOVEREIGN RISK (Plenary Hall) ROOM 1 ROOM 2 ROOM 3 ROOM 4 ROOM 5 ROOM 6 ROOM 7 ROOM 8 ROOM 9 ROOM 10 Plenary Hall WORKSHOP WORKSHOP WORKSHOP WORKSHOP WORKSHOP WORKSHOP WORKSHOP TRADING WORKSHOP WORKSHOP WORKSHOP IFRS 9 OPERATIONAL TREASURY COMPUTATIONAL TRADING DISPERSION MARKET Quantitative RISK CURRENT STRATEGIES FINANCIAL CONDITIONS RISK MANAGEMENT FINANCE FOR VOLATILITY RISK MODELS FOR APPETITE SECURITIES 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM QUANTS AND RELATIVE AND OUTLOOK VALUE FOR ARBITRAGING, (International FOR GLOBAL Santiago Suresh José Alatorre OPTIONS AND Gerardo Zamudio HEDGING, Gustavo Fuertes FINANCIAL CORPORATE Carrillo Sankaran Oscar Sierra (Part II) SWAPS Fund Manager TRADING & RISK PricewaterhouseCoopers Solum Financial (PWC) REPORTING AND SOVEREIGN (Part II) (Part II) (Part II) MANAGEMENT Partners LLP (Part II) Standard ) CREDIT Marco Avellaneda (Part I) MARKETS Courant Institute of Paul Wilmott Edward Altman Mathematical Nicolás Olea (Parte I) Sciences, NYU Antonio Villarreal NYU 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM and Senior Partner, Finance KPMG Concepts LLC (Continue Part I) 12:00 PM - 12:30 PM BREAK TREASURY COMPUTATIONAL TRADING Quantitative IFRS 9 CURRENT OPERATIONAL TRADING DISPERSION MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT FINANCE FOR RISK MODELS FOR APPETITE Instrumentos CONDITIONS RISK QUANTS VOLATILITY STRATEGIES ARBITRAGING, FINANCIEROS AND OUTLOOK AND RELATIVE (Continue Part I) (Continue Part II) FOR GLOBAL (Continue Part II) (Continue Part II) (Continue Part II) HEDGING, (International (Continue Part II) CORPORATE AND 12:30 PM - 2:30 PM VALUE FOR TRADING & RISK OPTIONS AND FINANCIAL SOVEREIGN CREDIT SWAPS MANAGEMENT REPORTING MARKETS (Continue Part I) (Continue) Standard) (Continue) 2:30 PM - 4:00 PM FREE LUNCH TRADING WORKSHOP OPERATIONAL TREASURY COMPUTATIONAL TRADING FIXED DISPERSION MARKET WORKSHOP WORKSHOP FINANCE FOR BASEL III. COUNTERPARTY RISK MANAGEMENT VOLATILITY INCOME: STRATEGIES RISK DEVELOPMENT REGULACIÓN: QUANTS (Continue Part II) TRADING & AND RELATIVE (Continue Part I) AND DODD FRANK RISK & CVA 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM (Continue
Recommended publications
  • Basel Violations, Volatility Model Variants and Value at Risk: Optimization of Performance Deviations in Banks
    Economics and Business Letters 10(3), 240-248, 2021 Basel violations, volatility model variants and value at risk: Optimization of performance deviations in banks Shahid Anjum1,* • Naveeda Qaseem2 1Universiti Teknologi Brunei, Brunei Darussalam 2University of Westminster, United Kingdom Received: 26 October 2020 Revised: 12 February 2021 Accepted: 14 February 2021 Abstract Basel penalties originate from VaR violations, based on the type of variance models and the estimation of VaR thresholds employed by the bank, which leads to excess regulatory capital charge held and can affect banks’ risk taking ability and thus its profitability. Different approaches are used to evaluate the performance of variance models and forecasts of the VaR thresholds i.e. hypothesis tests, back-testing procedures and Basel Accord regulatory calculations for penalty zones. A multi-criteria performance measure named as analytical hierarchy process has been introduced in this study. The approach helps in evaluating and selection of the optimal internal model based on performance evaluation techniques objectively which, in turn, may help in the selection of best volatility internal model for reduction in the VaR violations and thus leaving more capital in the hands of the banks for profitable ventures. Keywords: volatility models; value at risk estimation and performance measures; multivariate techniques; multi-criteria decision making JEL Classification Codes: G21, K23, M16, N20, O16 1. Introduction Volatility is the focus of market risk measurement, management and reporting exercises. Measuring the variance or volatility of the market portfolio is at the heart of measuring VaR threshold for the capital charge of market risk (Bhandari; 2010; Dardac et el.; 2011 & Mehta et el.; 2012) and thus banks’ compliance with Basel regulations (Anjum; 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Barings Bank Disaster Man Family of Merchants and Bankers
    VOICES ON... Korn Ferry Briefings The Voice of Leadership HISTORY Baring, a British-born member of the famed Ger- January 17, 1995, the devastating earthquake in Barings Bank Disaster man family of merchants and bankers. Barings Kobe sent the Nikkei tumbling, and Leeson’s losses was England’s oldest merchant bank; it financed reached £827 million, more than the entire capital the Napoleonic Wars and the Louisiana Purchase, and reserve funds of the bank. A young rogue trader brings down a 232-year-old bank. and helped finance the United States government Leeson and his wife fled Singapore, trying to “I’m sorry,” he says. during the War of 1812. At its peak, it was a global get back to London, and made it as far as Frankfurt financial institution with a powerful influence on airport, where he was arrested. He fought extradi- the world’s economy. tion back to Singapore for nine months but was BY GLENN RIFKIN Leeson, who grew up in the middle-class eventually returned, tried, and found guilty. He was London suburb of Watford, began his career in sentenced to six years in prison and served more the mid-1980s as a clerk with Coutts, the royal than four years. His wife divorced him, and he was bank, followed by a succession of jobs at other diagnosed with colon cancer while in prison, which banks, before landing at Barings. Ambitious and got him released early. He survived treatment and aggressive, he was quickly promoted settled in Galway, Ireland. In the past to the trading floor, and in 1992 he was “WE WERE 24 years, Leeson remarried and had two appointed manager of a new operation sons.
    [Show full text]
  • Algorithmic Approach to Options Trading
    International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 08 Issue: 05 | May 2021 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 Algorithmic Approach to Options Trading Shubham Horambe1, Ketan Khanolkar1, Dhairya Dixit1, Huzaifa Shaikh1, Prof. Manasi U. Kulkarni2 1B. Tech Student, Dept of Computer Engineering and IT, VJTI College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India 2 Assistant Professor, Dept of Computer Engineering and IT, VJTI College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India ----------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - Majority of the traders lose money whilst trading sitting in front of the screen for hours. Due to this continuous in options owing to market speculation, emotional trading and monitoring requirement, the performance of Manual Trading lack of risk management. The purpose of this research paper is is limited to the amount of time of the day the trader can to introduce an automated way of trading in options in order dedicate to trading. Other than this, Manual Trading also to tackle these problems. To achieve this, we have adopted suffers from time delays, which is the ability to execute some basic option strategies namely Covered Call, Protective trades in a small-time window. Also, for predicting Put and Covered Strangle. These strategies have been tested unprecedented non-random changes that take place in trade over a period of 5 years (2015-2019) for a set of stocks in the prices, a trader must delve into and analyze more and more U.S options market. information which is more powerful than information available on open-sources like news platforms. This is very Key Words: Options, Algorithmic Trading, Call Option, Put difficult to do for humans, as unlike computers, we can Option.
    [Show full text]
  • Société Générale and Barings
    Volume 17, Number 7 Printed ISSN: 1078-4950 PDF ISSN: 1532-5822 JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY FOR CASE STUDIES Editors Inge Nickerson, Barry University Charles Rarick, Purdue University, Calumet The Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies is owned and published by the DreamCatchers Group, LLC. Editorial content is under the control of the Allied Academies, Inc., a non-profit association of scholars, whose purpose is to support and encourage research and the sharing and exchange of ideas and insights throughout the world. Page ii Authors execute a publication permission agreement and assume all liabilities. Neither the DreamCatchers Group nor Allied Academies is responsible for the content of the individual manuscripts. Any omissions or errors are the sole responsibility of the authors. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of manuscripts for publication from among those submitted for consideration. The Publishers accept final manuscripts in digital form and make adjustments solely for the purposes of pagination and organization. The Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies is owned and published by the DreamCatchers Group, LLC, PO Box 1708, Arden, NC 28704, USA. Those interested in communicating with the Journal, should contact the Executive Director of the Allied Academies at [email protected]. Copyright 2011 by the DreamCatchers Group, LLC, Arden NC, USA Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies, Volume 17, Number 7, 2011 Page iii EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS Irfan Ahmed Devi Akella Sam Houston State University Albany State University Huntsville, Texas Albany, Georgia Charlotte Allen Thomas T. Amlie Stephen F. Austin State University SUNY Institute of Technology Nacogdoches, Texas Utica, New York Ismet Anitsal Kavous Ardalan Tennessee Tech University Marist College Cookeville, Tennessee Poughkeepsie, New York Joe Ballenger Lisa Berardino Stephen F.
    [Show full text]
  • THE COLLAPSE of BARINGS BANK and LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC: an ABRIDGED VERSION Juabin Matey, Bcom, UCC, Ghana. Mgoodluck369
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 8 October 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202007.0006.v3 THE COLLAPSE OF BARINGS BANK AND LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC: AN ABRIDGED VERSION Juabin Matey, Bcom, UCC, Ghana. [email protected] James Dianuton Bawa, MSc (Student) Industrial Finance and Investment, KNUST, Ghana. [email protected] ABSTRACT Bank crisis is mostly traced to a decrease in the value of bank assets. This occurs in one or a combination of the following incidences; when loans turn bad and cease to perform (credit risk), when there are excess withdrawals over available funds (liquidity risk) and rising interest rates (interest rate risk). Bad credit management, market inefficiencies and operational risk are among a host others that trigger panic withdrawals when customers suspect a loss of investment. This brief article makes a contribution on why Barings Bank and Lehman Brothers failed and lessons thereafter. The failure of Barings Bank and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc was as a result of an array of factors spanning from lack of oversight role in relation to employee conduct the course performing assigned duties to management’s involvement in dubious accounting practices, unethical business practices, over indulging in risky and unsecured derivative trade. To guide against similar unfortunate bank collapse in the near future, there should be an enhanced communication among international regulators and authorities that exercise oversight responsibilities on the security market. National bankruptcy laws should be invoked to forestall liquidity crisis so as to prevent freezing of margins and positions of solvent customers. © 2020 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license.
    [Show full text]
  • Point-In-Time Versus Through-The-Cycle Ratings 1
    Point-in-Time versus Through-the-Cycle Ratings 1 Authors: Scott D. Aguais, Lawrence R. Forest, Jr., Elaine Y. L. Wong, Diana Diaz-Ledezma 2 1 The authors would like to acknowledge the many Basel and credit risk related discussions they have had with various members of the Barclays Risk Management Team over the last year. The authors also want to thank, Tim Thompson, Julian Shaw and Brian Ranson for helpful comments. Moodys|KMV also deserves thanks for providing an historical data set of five-year KMV EDF term structures for all of their counterparties. Finally, we thank Zoran Stanisavljevic, for his un-ending credit data management support for our credit research and modelling efforts. All errors remain the responsibility of the authors. The views and opinions expressed in this chapter are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Barclays Bank PLC. 2 Scott Aguais is Director and Head of Credit Risk Methodology. Lawrence Forest and Elaine Wong are Associate Directors, and Diana Diaz-Ledezma is a Manager, all on the Credit Risk Methodology Team. All four work at Barclays Capital, the Investment Banking unit of Barclays. Draft – For Discussion Purposes Only I. Introduction: To qualify for the advanced internal ratings-based (AIRB) status under the Basel II Capital Accord, “internationally active banks” (“banks”) must document the validity not only of their probability of default (PD) estimates but also of the Loss Given Default (LGD) and Exposure at Default (EAD) measures that they plan to use as alternatives to the foundation internal ratings-based (FIRB) assumptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Considering Stricter Regulation of the International Over-The-Counter Derivatives Market
    PRUDENCE OR PARANOIA: CONSIDERING STRICTER REGULATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL OVER-THE-COUNTER DERIVATIVES MARKET I. INTRODUCTION Recent reports of companies and municipalities losing millions of dollars from investments in over-the-counter (OTC) financial derivatives' have prompted foreboding headlines about derivatives,2 encouraged increased scrutiny of their use,3 and polarized opinions toward these misunderstood financial instruments.4 While OTC and 1. In April 1994, Procter & Gamble announced a $157 million derivatives loss which was taken as a pre-tax charge. Paulette Thomas, Procter& Gamble Sues Bankers Trust Because of Huge Losses on Derivatives, WALL ST. J., Oct. 28, 1994, at A6. Metallgesellschaft, Germany's fourteenth largest industrial corporation, lost $1.45 billion speculating in oil-based derivatives. Michael R. Sesit, Bulls on MetallgeselischaftSay German Firm, Hurt by TradingLosses, Could Stage Rebound, WALL ST. J., July 25, 1994, at C2. In December 1994, Orange County, California declared bankruptcy after losing approximately $1.5 billion from derivatives products. Bitter FruitOrange County, Mired In Investment Mess, Filesfor Bankruptcy, WALL ST. J., Dec. 7, 1994, at Al. Barings, a venerable British bank, was recently sunk by a "rogue trader" who lost about $900 million using derivatives instruments. The Bank that Disappeared,ECONOMIST, Mar. 4, 1995, at 11. 2. See, e.g., Jane Bryant Quinn, Just When You Thought It Was Safe... ; Derivatives Present a New Risk, Even If You Think You're Not Involved, CHI. TRB., Apr. 25,1994, at Cl; Ruth Simon, Don't Get Socked by These #?@1* Derivatives, MONEY, Aug. 1994, at 26; Jim Gallagher, It's a Bet" No Getting Around Derivatives' High Risk, ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Created the Financial Crisis and How Do We Prevent the Next One?
    More Years of Economic Stress . Current crisis is caused by the collapse of the biggest credit bubble in modern US history . Growth will restart when the credit system is reasonably repaired . Growth will restart more slowly than after past recessions 1 We Borrowed More Than Ever Before 225 Total Domestic Nonfinancial Debt as a % of GDP 225 210 210 195 195 180 180 165 165 60-Year Mean = 155.4% 150 150 135 135 (E500) 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Source: Ned Davis Research, 1/14/09 2 1 We Cleverly Packaged All this Debt into Leveraged Structures Loans Pools Sliced and Waterfall Repackaged of Tranches CDO CDO2 AAA AA CLO Synthetic CDO A BB B With a balance sheet With an added Assets Liabilities balance sheet Debt Loans Investor Equity 3 Then Margin Calls Collapsed the Value of Securities, Their Holders and Their Originators Margin Calls Sale of Good Losses Assets on Mortgages Collapse of Banks, Funds More Margin Calls Falling Prices of Assets Lower Meltdown Prices of CITI Assets BEAR STEARNS More Margin Calls LEHMAN More Asset MERRILL Sales AIG 4 2 Bereft of Capital, Banks Tightened Lending and Pushed the Economy into Deep Recession Banks’ Willingness to Lend to Consumers Percentage Tightening Standards on (% more willing minus % less willing) Loans to Large and Medium Sized Firms Percentage Tightening Standards on Percentage Tightening Standards on Loans to Small Firms Commercial Real Estate Loans Source: Federal Reserve through Q4, 2008; Hoisington Investment Management Company, January 2009 5 Securitization
    [Show full text]
  • Front Office Middle Office Back Office
    HEDGE FUND TECHNOLOGY Front Office Page 2 Research and Analysis Page 4 Trade Execution and Management Page 8 Portfolio Management Middle Office Page 11 Data Management Page 13 Risk Management Page 15 Cash and Collateral Management Page 16 Securities Pricing and NAV Calculation Page 17 Investor Relations Page 18 Trade Reconciliation and Processing Back Office Page 19 Accounting Page 21 Compliance and Reporting Page 24 Administration Page 25 IT Security and Support HEDGE FUND ALERT: 5 Marine View Plaza, Suite 400, Hoboken NJ 07030. 201-659-1700 To start your FREE trial subscription, return to HFAlert.com and click on “Free Trial”. Or call 201-659-1700. You can also complete the Free Trial Coupon on the last page of this newsletter and fax it to 201-659-4141. Hedge Fund 2 ALERT HEDGE FUND TECHNOLOGY FRONT OFFICE: Research and Analysis FRONT OFFICE: Research and Analysis Vendor Product The Skinny AIM Software GAIN Corporate Actions DM Tracks various corporate events for companies in an investment portfolio, enabling aimsoftware.com the manager to react promptly to announcements. Austrian vendor founded in 1999. Arialytics Aria Aims to reduce the time it takes to identify, design and review trading algorithms. arialytics.com Created with new and emerging managers in mind. Allows users to quickly analyze big-data sets to identify patterns and predictors. Machine-learning component tweaks models in response to real-time activity. Rye, N.Y., vendor founded in 2010 by David Marra, previously a principal at Boston Consulting. Dataminr Dataminr Continually monitors and analyzes publicly available Twitter feeds for information dataminr.com about companies and investments.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Risk of Cdos and CDO Arbitrage
    Systematic risk of CDOs and CDO arbitrage Alfred Hamerle (University of Regensburg) Thilo Liebig (Deutsche Bundesbank) Hans-Jochen Schropp (University of Regensburg) Discussion Paper Series 2: Banking and Financial Studies No 13/2009 Discussion Papers represent the authors’ personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Deutsche Bundesbank or its staff. Editorial Board: Heinz Herrmann Thilo Liebig Karl-Heinz Tödter Deutsche Bundesbank, Wilhelm-Epstein-Strasse 14, 60431 Frankfurt am Main, Postfach 10 06 02, 60006 Frankfurt am Main Tel +49 69 9566-0 Telex within Germany 41227, telex from abroad 414431 Please address all orders in writing to: Deutsche Bundesbank, Press and Public Relations Division, at the above address or via fax +49 69 9566-3077 Internet http://www.bundesbank.de Reproduction permitted only if source is stated. ISBN 978-3–86558–570–7 (Printversion) ISBN 978-3–86558–571–4 (Internetversion) Abstract “Arbitrage CDOs” have recorded an explosive growth during the years before the outbreak of the financial crisis. In the present paper we discuss potential sources of such arbitrage opportunities, in particular arbitrage gains due to mispricing. For this purpose we examine the risk profiles of Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) in some detail. The analyses reveal significant differences in the risk profile between CDO tranches and corporate bonds, in particular concerning the considerably increased sensitivity to systematic risks. This has far- reaching consequences for risk management, pricing and regulatory capital requirements. A simple analytical valuation model based on the CAPM and the single-factor Merton model is used in order to keep the model framework simple.
    [Show full text]
  • A Note on Sources
    A Note on Sources Transactional data It took considerable research to put together the tables for this book. The volume of information to be captured has of course exploded in recent years, with 2007 taking the record for the most private equity related transactions. But the most difficult tables to research were those in earlier years. During the period 1984–1995 the biggest challenge was that many of today’s current M&A news services were not active, including merger market and initiative Europe’s Deutsche Unquote. For more recent years, reliance on these two sources would provide approximately 80% coverage of the transactions. The next challenge is that a number of the early players in the 1984–1995 period are no longer in operation, and consequently have no internet pages or latter- day coverage. Consequently, for the early years we have had to give greater reliance on information from interviews which may not be as complete as for later years. Confirmation of information gained in inter- views has been mainly achieved (where possible) through consulting the “history” sections of the internet pages of the companies involved. For the more recent years we were greatly assisted by having access to Bain & Company’s collection of the buyout data for the period 1996–2003, and L.E.K. Consulting’s data for period 2002–2009. An additional useful source for the period 1998–2003 were the tables from Nico Reimers’ “Private Equity für Familienunternehmen”. We have included in our tables transactions closed in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Various terms are used to define this region, most notably “German-speaking region” or “DACH” (based upon car licence plate abbreviations for the three countries).
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Leong Finance Chooses Kamakura's Suite of Solutions For
    Press Contacts: 2222 Kalakaua Avenue, 14th Floor Martin Zorn Honolulu, Hawaii 96815, USA President and COO Telephone 808 791 9888 1-808-791-9888, extension 8700 Fax 808 791 9898 [email protected] www.kamakuraco.com www.kamakuraco.com www.kris-online.com For Immediate Release Hong Leong Finance Singapore Chooses Kamakura’s Suite of Solutions for Asset and Liabilities Management, Funds Transfer Pricing, and Liquidity Management SINGAPORE, Nov 14, 2017 - Hong Leong Finance has signed an agreement to use Kamakura Corporation’s set of solutions for its balance sheet management, funds transfer pricing, and liquidity management processes. The Singapore-listed finance company, part of the Hong Leong Group Singapore, made its decision after doing a comprehensive upgrade exercise involving its risk management processes. “Hong Leong Finance was clear in its risk vision, and wanted to incorporate an integrated framework for balance sheet management, funds transfer pricing and liquidity management initiatives,” said Dr. Clement Ooi, Kamakura’s EVP and Managing Director of Asia-Pacific Operations. “They wanted to load the data once, and reconcile the data once. Kamakura Corporation’s solution fit the bill perfectly, providing the company with an accurate assessment of transaction cashflows that can then be used for gap, duration, and mismatch management, as well providing a crystal-clear understanding of the margins associated with transactions. The company now has an integrated, holistic computation engine—the platform upon which it will build its integrated risk framework. The company will be one of the first to generate both historical and forward-looking views of its balance sheet and gain a transaction-level understanding of profit margins.
    [Show full text]