Unisa-Abstract-Of-Le

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Unisa-Abstract-Of-Le Not out of Greece Decolonisation by challenging the false history of science C. K. Raju A tentative outline of 5 lectures Lecture 1: The stock model of the history of science Terminology: I begin by clarifying that “West” and “White” both refer to a state of the mind,1 and not to a direction in space or the color of the skin. Many black thinkers such as Fanon2 have struggled to understand what “white” means given that many people with black skins start thinking like whites. The concept of the West is a cultural concept used by historians such as Spengler3 and Toynbee4 to understand history. It is also a strategic concept used by modern-day military strategists, such as Huntington,5 as I have discussed.6 Stock model of history of science: The “stock model” of the history of science glorifies whites: all science is attributed to early Greeks and then to Europeans after the renaissance. Though the Greeks are mostly from Alexandria in Africa, they are invariably portrayed as white. As a recent article claimed, much mathematics is the work of dead white men. Examples of this “stock model” from Wikipedia accounts glorifying figures such as Euclid, Archimedes, Claudius Ptolemy. Copernicus, Newton, as the creators of mathematics, astronomy, and science. Examining the sources: Primary, secondary, and tertiary source. Wikipedia as an unreliable tertiary source. Some other accounts from secondary sources Egypt,7 China,8 Arabia9, India,10 and the non- West11 generally. Pyramids and calendars in South America. What resources are required to get back to to primary sources? 1 “the most potent weapon in the hands of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed”, Steve Biko, I write what I like, ed. Aelred Stubbs C. R., African Writers Series, 1997 (also Heinemann, Oxford, 1987), p. 62. 2 Frantz Fanon, Black skins, white masks, trans. C. L. Markmann, foreword Homi K. Bhabha and Ziauddin Sardar, Plut Press, 2008. 3 Oswald Spengler, The Decline of the West, vol. I, Form and Actuality, trans. C. F. Atkinson, George Allen & Unwin, London, 1926. 4 Arnold J. Toynbee, A Study of History, abridgement in 2 vols. by D.C. Somervell, Oxford University Press, 1957. 5 Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, Viking, New Delhi, 1997. 6 C. K. Raju, The Eleven Pictures of Time, Sage, 2003, chp. 3 and the term “West” in the glossary. 7 M. Clagett, Ancient Egyptian science: A source book. 3 Vols, especially vol. 3 Ancient Egyptian mathematics. American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, 1999. 8 Joseph Needham, The Shorter Science and Civilisation in China, esp. vol. 2, abridged by Colin A. Ronan, Cambridge Univ. press, 1981. 9 Salim T.S. Al-Hassani ed. 1001 Inventions: Muslim Heritage in Our World (2nd ed.). Foundation for Science Technology and Civilization, London, 2011. 10 C. K. Raju, Cultural Foundations of Mathematics, Pearson Longman, Delhi, 2007. Also, Is Science Western in Origin? Multiversity Penang, Daanish Books Delhi 2009. Reprint Other India Bookstore, 2014. 11 Helaine Selin ed., Encyclopedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in NonWestern Cultures. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordecht, 1997, Springer 2008, Springer (online) 2014. Lecture 2: Political consequences of the stock model Relation to racism. The first moral justification for slavery was the Biblical “curse of Kam”, and this justification was being mentioned in books12 published shortly before the American Civil War, and the declaration of emancipation. However, after the organized slave trade, many blacks turned Christian, and given also the rise of science, moral justification based on “science” came to be preferred. Since the Greeks were portrayed as white, this history of science was used to project black/brown/yellow people as inferior, and morally justify slavery. Common examples of Western academic consensus in support of racism: Kant, Hume, Mill etc. Relation to colonialism: This stock history of science was used by Macaulay to declare that all or most science is Western. On this ground, Macaulay in 1835 declared the West as “immeasurably superior” in science13 and imposed Western education on the colonised arguing that the colonised needed it for the sake of science. Who needed colonial education: the colonised or the coloniser? The colonised were gullible and believed that the colonisers were actually working for the benefit of the colonised, and not their own benefit. In fact, it was the colonisers who were militarily insecure and afraid of revolts. Colonial education was imposed because the colonisers needed it as a way to curb revolts. The same Macaulay in an 1848 speech to British parliament14 argued at length that education for the British poor was the best means to exorcise the spectre of revolution that then haunted Europe. The first Western universities were set up in India shortly after the Indian revolt of 1857. How does colonial indoctrination capture the mind? Evidently, Macaulay understood that Western education creates a slave mentality, and makes the ruled submissive to the rulers. Why does Western education enslave the mind? If we examine its history, we find that Western education was a church monopoly until 1870, when the first bill for secular school education was introduced in Britain. Until that date the church controlled Western education, not only that provided by countless missionary schools, but ALL Western universities (such as Oxford and Cambridge) which were founded by the church, remained under church control. The church, too, invested in that education for its own benefit, not the benefit of the educated. Church education was designed to produce missionaries in the service of the church. The job of a missionary is to sell church dogmas which may be contrary to commonsense, like virgin birth, and remain firm in his belief in the teeth of opposition. Accordingly, the missionary mindset due to church education created a person who (a) trusts authority above commonsense, and uses that to cling to church dogmas, and (b) is deeply prejudiced against all critics, and denounces them without ever engaging with the critique. Given the church state alliance, colonial education was a slight variant: it taught trust in Western authority, not church authoirity. Hence, as a consequence of colonial indoctrination, the colonially educated learn to trust the West and are deeply prejudice against the non-West. They develop an inferiority complex in relation to the West, and can be observed to blindly mimic the West, and accept all things Western, carrying this mimicry to an absurd extent. 12 Josiah Priest, Bible Defence of Slavery...and A Plan of National Colonization Adequate to the Entire Removal of Free Blacks, by Rev. W. S. Brown, Louiseville, Kentucky, William Bush, 1851. 13 T. B. Macaulay, Minute on Education, 1835. The Minute may be found online on many sites, such as http://www.languageinindia.com/april2003/macaulay.html. 14 T. B. Macaulay, Speech to the House of Commons, 18 April 1847. Miscellaneous Writings and Speeches of Lord Macaulay, vol. IV, Speeches of Lord Macaulay, http://www.gutenberg.org/files/2170/2170-h/2170-h.htm#2H_4_0031. Lecture 3: Resistance to colonialism To challenge the racist and colonial claims of “superiority”, it is important to contest this stock history of science. Resistance to false history. Resistance to racism let to some earlier critiques of the stock history of science. The counter-claims that black Egyptian achievements were appropriated to the white Greeks. A brief account of George James,15 Cheikh Anta Diop,16 Martin Bernal,17 etc. Summary of responses to these critiques: Mary Lefkowitz18 et al. The new critique 1: The above critiques are inadequate since they they do not connect to the history of science (the reason cited for colonial education), and Greek glorification persists in the history of science. Further, both critics and supporters have totally failed to take into account the origins of racist and colonial history in earlier false history fabricated by the church, and also the imperial concerns to maintain those fabrications today. Thus, ever since its marriage to the state, in the 4th c., the church used false history to “prove” its superiority. The first church historian Eusebius wrote an extravagant hagiography of Constantine. The next church historian, Orosius, unabashedly used false history to denigrate “pagans”. This Christian triumphalist model of history as a means of glorifying supporters, and denigrating opponents became the model of history down to Toynbee and Fukuyama. During the Crusades this history went ballistic, and was applied against Muslims. At that time, numerous texts were translated from Arabic into Latin. This translation was made theologically correct by advancing the fantastic conjecture that all secular knowledge in Arabic texts was the work of early Greeks. Where was the knowledge hiding all those centuries? A story of the “dark ages” was invented to “explain” that this knowledge was lost to Christian Europe, but was retained in the safe custody of Muslims, and hence was a rightful Christian inheritance. This history was boosted during the Inquisition, when knowledge was imported from all parts of the world, including India, and China, but its non-Christian origins were denied for fear of persecution. Examples are Copernicus and his heliocentric model (due to Ibn Shatir), Mercator and his chart (copied from Chinese star maps, using Indian trigonometric values), Newton and the calculus (imported from India). Another term “renaissance” was invented to explain the sudden spurt in purported European creativity. The new critique 2: Racist historians did not begin ab initio but appropriated this long legacy of false history by a simple trick: an easy change of categories. The purported early Greek authors instead of being regarded as “friends of Christians” were regarded as whites! (Though it remains a mystery how the color of the author's skin can be deduced from a text!) That is, claims of Greek achievements in science, a fiction of Crusading history against Muslims, was repackaged and reused by racist historians against blacks.
Recommended publications
  • Unit-I-What Is Multiculturalism?- Bhikhu Parekh
    Core-XI- Diasporic Writngs (18MEN33C) Unit-I-What is Multiculturalism?- Bhikhu Parekh • A Brief introduction to the author Bhikhu Parekh. • Bhikhu Parekh is a Professor of Political theory at the University of Hull from 1982-2001 • Professor of Political Philosophy at the University of Westminster from 2001-2009 • President of the Academy of Social Sciences from 2003-2008. • Served as a Labour Party Member of the House of Lords. What is Multiculturalism? • Definition: • Multiculturalism is a movement, particularly those of minority groups with different cultures, races and ethnicities demanding special acknowledgement within a dominant political culture. • The early 1970s marked the emergence of multicultural movement first in Canada, Australia. • Later,it spread to USA, UK and Germany Multiculturalism –What it means and stand for, according to Bhikhu Parekh • All human beings are culturally embedded in the sense that they grow up and live within a culturally structured world and organise their lives and social relations in terms of a culturally derived system of meaning and significance. • Different cultures represent different systems of meaning and visions of the good life. • A culturally self contained life is virtually impossible for most human beings in the modern, mobile and interdependent world. No culture is wholly worthless, that it deserves at least some respect because of what it means to its members and the creative energy it displays, that no culture is perfect and has a right to impose itself on others, and that cultures are best changed from within. • Every culture is internally plural and reflects a continuing conversation between its different traditions and strands of thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Discourses in Southeast Asia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UKM Journal Article Repository Alternative Discourses in SoutheastSari Asia 19 (2001) 49 - 67 49 Alternative Discourses in Southeast Asia SYED FARID ALATAS ABSTRAK Makalah ini memperhatikan soal wacana-wacana pengganti dalam ilmu- ilmu kemasyarakatan. Wacana pengganti adalah karya yang mencuba menghapuskan gagasan-gagasan yang kuat tertanam dalam ilmu-ilmu kemasyarakatan, sebahagiannya akibat daripada penjajahan dan Eropa- sentrisme yang berterusan. Dalam konteks Asia Tenggara dan sebahagian besar daripada dunia bukan-Barat, wacana-wacana pengganti bermaksud juga ilmu kemasyarakatan anti Eropasentrik. Rencana ini membincangkan kemunculan wacana-wacana pengganti di Asia Tenggara, takrif wacana pengganti dan masa depan wacana di rantau ini. Kata kunci: wacana alternatif, Eurocentrisma, Orientalisma, membentuk semula ABSTRACT This article brings into focus the question of alternative discourses in the social sciences. Alternative discourses are works that attempt to debunk ideas that have become entrenched in the social sciences, partly as a result of colo- nialism and the continuing Eurocentrism in the social sciences. In the context of Southeast Asia as well as much of the non-Western world, alternative dis- courses in the social sciences could also be referred to collectively as counter- Eurocentric social science. This paper discusses the emergence of alternative discourses in Southeast Asia, the defintion of alternative discourse, and the future of these discourses in our region. Keywords: alternative discourse, Eurocentrism, Orientralism, reconstruction INTRODUCTION This essay brings into focus the question of alternative discourses in the social sciences. Alternative discourses are works that attempt to debunk ideas that have become entrenched in the social sciences, partly as a result of colonialism and the continuing Eurocentrism in the social sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • International Meeting on Interculturality
    Interculturael. Balance and perspectives International meeting on interculturality. november 2001 Transversal lines of the debates Yolanda Onghena (+34) 93 302 6495 - Fax. (+34) 93 302 6495 - [email protected] (+34) 93 302 6495 - Fax. [email protected] - Calle Elisabets, 12 08001 Barcelona, España Tel. Fundación CIDOB TRANSVERSAL LINES OF THE DEBATES PRESENTATION DYNAMICS • TRANSFORMATION • COMMUNICATION • DIALOGUE • LANGUAGE • STRATEGIES USES • RECIPROCITY • LIVING TOGETHER • ENCOUNTER • RECOGNITION • RELATIONSHIP CONTEXTS • GLOBAL/LOCAL • POLITICAL • PLURALISMS • CENTRALISMS • DIVERSITY • LIMITS • TRANSVERSAL LINES OF THE DEBATES Yolanda Onghena Head of Intercultural Unit CIDOB Foundation Presentation As a supplement to the report, we have chosen to include portions of the debates, which, through the actual words of the participants, provide a synthesis of the meeting. We have decided to divide up the comments into three areas: dynamics, uses, and contexts. While there is something artificial about dividing up constantly overlapping approaches in this manner, we did think it might be useful for the reader if we created what we might call focal points. This is not a complete transcription but rather a selection of presentations touching on the topics most discussed, even at times from opposing positions. The first group, dynamics, contains comments about transformation, communication, dialogue, language, and strategy. The second group is an attempt to reach a definition of interculturality through thinking about its uses: reciprocity, living-together, meeting, recognition, and relationship. This reflection would be incomplete if consideration were not given to different contexts: global and local contexts, the political context, centralisms, diversity and the limits of interculturality. We hope, in this way, to draw the reader into the debate and allow him/her to carry on with the reflections begun here.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociology of Science
    ELK ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF Social Science ISSN 2349-9392 (Online); DOI: 10.16962/EAPJSS/issn. 2454-2997/2015; Volume 7 Issue 1 (2020) www.elkjournals.com Unleashing the potential of the ‘Sociology of Science’: Capitalizing on the power of science to usher in social, cultural and intellectual revolutions across the world, and lay the foundations of twenty-first century pedagogy Sujay Rao M Institute for the study of the Globalization of Science Email ID – [email protected] Abstract This paper reviews the definitions of science put forward by different scholars, its myriad functions, its social duties and responsibilities, and the role played by science communication to the masses. It discusses the historical role played by science in ushering in social and intellectual revolutions particularly in the context of Europe and other developed societies, and the need to replicate them elsewhere. It also discusses the scope and the nature of work carried out in the fields of sociology of science as well as its limitations arising from its Eurocentrism and an ivory-tower approach. It also discusses how the ‘Sociology of science’ can be used to help the rapid intellectual and economic development of developing countries and tradition-bound societies by analysing differences between developed countries and developing countries as well as differences within developing countries, and can play a role in changing the lives of millions of people across the world. We believe the ‘sociology of Science’ encompassing fields such as historiography and sociology will go a long way in ensuring that the benefits of a scientific temper are properly communicated to millions of people across cultures, and that these can counter superstition, blind faith as well as traditional interpretations of various phenomena, besides aiding economic development.
    [Show full text]
  • Oriental Globalization: Past and Present Jan Nederveen Pieterse the Critique of Eurocentrism Has Gone Through Several Rounds. Th
    Oriental Globalization: Past and Present Jan Nederveen Pieterse The critique of Eurocentrism has gone through several rounds. The first round was primarily a critique of Orientalism. Edward Said and Martin Bernal, among others, focused on cultural bias and racism in Eurocentric history. Others addressed Eurocentric biases in development thinking (Samir Amin, Paul Bairoch, Stavrianos) and historiography (Eric Wolf, James Blaut, Jack Goody). In the second round, history from the viewpoint of the global South such as Subaltern Studies in India and revisionist history of Africa contributed different perspectives. In addition, global history generated critical historical studies that document the significance of in particular Asia and the Middle East in the making of the global economy and world society. Janet Abu-Lughod focused on the Middle East, Marshall Hodgson on the world of Islam, K. N. Chauduri on South Asia, Andre Gunder Frank on East and South Asia, Kenneth Pomeranz, Robert Temple and Bin Wong on China, Eric Jones on Japan, and Anthony Reid on Southeast Asia along with many other studies. This body of work not merely critiques but overturns conventional Eurocentric perspectives and implies a profound rethinking of world history that holds major implications for social science and development studies. These studies break the mold of Eurocentric globalization that dominates the globalization literature. Eurocentric globalization is geographically centered on the West and preoccupied with recent history: post-war (in most economics, political science, international relations and cultural studies), post-1800 (most sociology), or post-1500 (Marxist political economy and world system theory).1 In history curricula the latter periods figure as the `modern’ and `early modern eras’.
    [Show full text]
  • International Symposium on the Origin of Indian
    International Symposium on The Origin of Indian Civilization Center for Indic Studies, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (UMass Dartmouth, North Dartmouth, MA July 8-9, 2011 DIALECTICS OF POWER AND CIVILIZATION Knowledge Centered Indian Civilization Professor R.P.Singh, Chairperson, Centre For Philosophy, School of Social Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi-110067 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] I am sceptical of all attempts to present any civilization as one whose origin lies within itself, as self-generating and sui generis, for I feel persuaded that all civilizations are born out of interaction with and absorb the influences of others and are shaped by power with its forces like economic, technological, political, linguistic, etc. There is thematic continuity at the very basis of Afrocentrism, Eurocentrism, Indocentrism, Sinocentrism and other kinds of centrisms, all of which relate the history of the civilization concerned from that of others and can not credit its achievements to its own genius. Civilization, civitas, means city or city-state, urbanized, with citizens, institutions- educational, economic, scientific, technological, etc. Civilized vs barbarians "those who babble", i.e. those who speak unintelligible languages. or primitive. "Not only the individual advances from infancy to manhood, but the species itself from rudeness to civilisation.” (A. Ferguson, An Essay on the History of Civil Society). There are dual opinions within society: one regarding civilization as purely material and another
    [Show full text]
  • Europe and Asia Beyond East and West
    Europe and Asia Beyond East and West This is a timely volume that explores Europe in its relation to Asia in a way that moves beyond simplistic notions of West and East. Rejecting the idea of a clash of civilizations, the contributions highlight the interlinked nature of Europe and Asia and attempt to identify cosmopolitan moments of openness. From both a historical and a contemporary perspective, it is shown that both Europe and Asia are not based on fixed cultural or geographical foundations. The East is also in the West. Rather than look at Europe and Asia in terms of separate worlds, they can be seen in terms of cultural struggles common to both. A general theme is that the idea of the West as an ideological, cultural and geopolitical construct is becoming increasingly questionable when applied to the current situation, which is one in which West and East are mutually linked. The articulation of a new European identity that includes a recognition of the non-European is now one of the major chances for Europe to define its identity in the world. Chapters are thematically organized under four headings: • A post-Western world • Asia in Europe: Encounters in History • Between Europe and Asia • Otherness in Europe and Asia This major new title will be of great value to students and researchers in the fields of Sociology, European Politics and History, and Cultural Theory. Gerard Delanty is Professor of Sociology, University of Liverpool. His recent books include (with Chris Rumford) Rethinking Europe: Social Theory and the Implications of Europeanization (Routledge, 2005); Community (Routledge, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Translating Wisdom: Hindu-Muslim Intellectual Interactions in Early Modern South Asia
    Religion | AsiAn studies NAIR TRANSLATING WISDOM During the height of Muslim power in Mughal South Asia, Hindu and Muslim schol- ars worked collaboratively to translate a large body of Hindu Sanskrit texts into the Persian language. Translating Wisdom reconstructs the intellectual processes that underlay these translations. Using as a case study the 1597 Persian rendition of the Yoga-Vāsis.t.ha—an influential and popular Sanskrit philosophical tale—Shan- kar Nair illustrates how these early modern scholars drew upon their respective tra- ditions to forge a common vocabulary through which to understand one another. These scholars thus achieved, Nair argues, a nuanced cultural exchange significant not only to South Asia’s past but also its present. “An erudite and valuable contribution. Nair’s deep linguistic and philosophical exper- tise illuminates the writings of three important if overlooked seventeenth-century thinkers.” Supriya Gandhi, author of The Emperor Who Never Was: Dara Shukoh in Mughal India “Nair exhibits a breathtaking command of languages, textual traditions, and intellec- tual cultures in this pioneering study of the crisscrossing of Sanskrit, Persian, and Arabic cultural jet streams in sixteenth-century India.” Jonardon Ganeri, author of The Lost Age of Reason: Philosophy in Early Modern India 1450–1700 “Shankar Nair examines a pivotal work of Mughal translation and shows how it chan- nels huge vortexes of Islamic and Hindu intellectual culture. A masterwork.” John Stratton Hawley, author of A Storm of Songs: India and the Idea of the Bhakti Movement in Early Modern South Asia in Early Modern Interactions Intellectual Hindu-Muslim “A welcome addition to the history of Hindu and Islamic interactions in early modern India, highlighting the subtleties of translation and the painstaking creation of a vo- cabulary important for both religions.” Francis X.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indo-Aryan Controversy: Evidence and Inference in Indian
    THE INDO-ARYAN CONTROVERSY For the first time in a single volume, this book presents the various arguments in the Indo-Aryan controversy by some of the principal scholars in this field of study. Its essays provide a template for the basic issues involved in the debates by addressing four major areas. First, archaeologists consider some of the recent findings and interpretations of the archaeological record, focusing particularly on the issue of the relationship between the Indus Valley archaeological complex and the culture of the Indo-Aryans as expressed in the Vedic texts. These chapters consider whether there was more continuity between the two civilizations than has been assumed in earlier works, and evaluate whether there is enough evidence to establish a definitive scholarly consensus as to whether or not the Indus civilization was actually Indo-Aryan. Second, scholars take on some of the linguistic issues in the debate, particularly the relationship between Indo-Aryan and its parent language Indo-European, as well as the linguistic borrowings between languages and language families. The discussion here rests on whether the traditional rules of linguistic derivation for Indo-European languages allow for the possibility that the origins of the Indo-Aryan languages developed in India itself. Additionally, authors debate whether contact between Indo-Aryan and non-Indo-Aryan languages (such as Dravidian or Munda) is the result of Indo-Aryan as a language intruding into the subcontinent, or whether other types of mutual interactions between those languages can account for such contacts. Third, philological scholars sieve through the Vedic texts to find clues that might situate the Vedic Aryans in space and time by correlating them with the archaeological record.
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization of Economy and Society
    O TTO- VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITÄT M AGDEBURG Fakultät für Geistes-, Sozial- und Erziehungswissenschaften Institut für Soziologie Heiko Schrader (Magdeburg) Globalisation, Fragmentation, and Modernity A r b e i t s b e r i c h t Nr. 18 Internet-Fassung April, 2003 ISSN-1615-8229 Zur Reihe der Arbeitsberichte Die „Arbeitsberichte“ des Instituts für Soziologie versammeln theoretische und empiri- sche Beiträge, die im Rahmen von Forschungsprojekten und Qualifikationsvorhaben entstanden sind. Präsentiert werden Überlegungen sowohl zu einschlägigen soziologi- schen Bereichen als auch aus angrenzenden Fachgebieten. Die Reihe verfolgt drei Absichten: Erstens soll die Möglichkeit der unverzüglichen Vorabveröffentlichung von theoretischen Beiträgen, empirischen Forschungsarbeiten, Reviews und Überblicksarbeiten geschaffen werden, die für eine Publikation in Zeit- schriften oder Herausgeberzwecken gedacht sind, dort aber erst mit zeitlicher Verzöge- rung erscheinen können. Zweitens soll ein Informations- und Diskussionsforum für jene Arbeiten geschaffen werden, die sich für eine Publikation in einer Zeitschrift oder Edi- tion weniger eignen, z. B. Forschungsberichte und –dokumentationen, Thesen- und Dis- kussionspapiere sowie hochwertige Arbeiten von Studierenden, die in forschungsorien- tierten Vertiefungen oder im Rahmen von Beobachtungs- und Empiriepraktika entstan- den. Drittens soll diese Reihe die Vielfältigkeit der Arbeit am Institut für Soziologie dokumentieren. Impressum: M AGDEBURG: OTTO- VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITÄT Herausgeber: Die Lehrstühle
    [Show full text]