DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological Inventory for Conservation of Great Lakes Islands: 1999 Progress Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Biological Inventory For Conservation of Great Lakes Islands: 1999 Progress Report Prepared by: Michael R. Penskar, Daria A. Hyde, Phyllis J. Higman, John J. Paskus, Reuben R. Goforth, David L. Cuthrell, Dennis A. Albert, Rebecca L. Boehm Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 30444 Lansing, MI 48909-7944 For: Great Lakes National Program Office Environmental Protection Agency GLNPO Grant # 985161-01-0 & Michigan Coastal Management Program Land and Water Management Division, MDEQ Coastal Management Program Grant # 98-309-14 Report Number 2000-11 Submitted June 30, 2000 This document has been converted to an electronic format. There may be some minor formatting changes between the original printed version and the electronic version. There is no difference in content. Cover Photo Identification and Credits: Shoreline photo: North shore of Garden Island, Charlevoix County, August, 1998, by Michael R. Penskar Bird inset: Blackburnian warbler, courtesy Petersen CD Field Guide to North American birds Plant inset: State threatened yellow pitcher-plant (Sarracenia purpurea f. heterophylla), June, 1999, discovered on Marquette Island, Les Cheneaux chain, Mackinac County; by Phyllis J. Higman Executive Summary In 1998, Michigan Natural Features Blanc Island than on the other two islands. A Inventory (MNFI) initiated a multi-year project quantitative assessment of habitat use by to conduct biological inventories for the migratory birds was conducted via selected point conservation of Great Lakes islands. The count censusing stations. During spring fundamental goal of this project is to migration, a greater number of individuals and systematically examine selected Great Lakes bird species were recorded near cobble islands, compile comprehensive information on shorelines bordered by coniferous forest, or near natural features and significant biodiversity an inland lake or wetland. areas, and then convey this information in the With regard to rare bird species, no piping most useful form for landowner education and plovers were observed on Beaver Island at a conservation planning purposes. The first year previously known site near McCauley Point. of the project focused on biological inventories Common loon was recorded at several locations in the Beaver Island archipelago (Beaver and on Beaver Island and at one Bois Blanc Island Garden islands in Charlevoix County) and a site. Red-shouldered hawks responded to taped selective floristic survey of several islands within calls and were observed or otherwise heard at the Garden Peninsula group (Poverty, Summer, several sites on Bois Blanc Island. Additional and Little Summer islands in Delta County). In rare bird observations include bald eagle (Beaver year two, we continued inventories within the and Bois Blanc islands), American bittern (Bois Beaver Island archipelago and also conducted Blanc and Beaver islands), caspian tern (Bois inventory work in northern Lake Huron, focusing Blanc and Beaver islands), common tern (Bois on Bois Blanc Island Blanc Island), osprey (Beaver and Garden (Mackinac County), Marquette and La Salle islands), Northern harrier (Beaver Island), islands within the Les Cheneaux chain Forster’s tern (Beaver Island), common moorhen (Mackinac County), and Drummond Island (Beaver island), and merlin (Beaver and Garden (Chippewa County). In addition, a prototype islands). conservation planning workshop was held on In other animal surveys, no aweme borer Beaver Island for residents and other island moths were found on Beaver Island at McCauley stakeholders. Point, site of the only known observation for this In 1999, animal surveys were conducted on extremely rare taxon in Michigan. New Beaver, Garden, and Bois Blanc islands, populations of the endemic Lake Huron locust focusing on migratory and breeding birds, rare were found at all three sites surveyed on Beaver insects, and selected reptiles. Overall, 133 island; no sites were identified on Bois Blanc different bird species were observed; 108 species Island, where little suitable habitat was found. were observed during spring migration and 109 Suitable habitat for the federal endangered species were observed during summer breeding Hine’s emerald dragonfly was identified on Bois season. Fifty-one species were classified as long- Blanc Island, where it was subsequently learned distance migrants, 55 species were classified as that a researcher had documented new locations short-distance migrants, and 27 species were for this species just prior to the MNFI inventory. classified as resident taxa. Mean bird abundance No Eastern massasauga rattlesnakes were during spring migration was greater on Bois observed during limited meander surveys on Blanc Island when compared to Beaver and Bois Blanc Island, although a resident population Garden islands; species richness was greater on likely remains extant, based on recent Beaver and Bois Blanc islands than on Garden observations of island residents. Island. Mean bird abundance during the summer Aquatic surveys focused on four inland lakes breeding season was greater on Bois Blanc and two streams on Beaver Island, and included Island when compared with Beaver and Garden dedicated surveys to determine the status of the islands; species richness during the summer deepwater pondsnail. No extant locations of the breeding season was slightly higher on Bois pondsnail were observed. SCUBA survey of Fox Great Lakes Islands 1999 – page i Lake concluded that reports of this species there cliff-brake, one of dry non-acid cliff), and one are likely in error, based on the apparent absence previously known occurrence was relocated and of suitable habitat. No rare or sensitive taxa updated (wall-rue). were identified during these brief aquatic As part of this project, all natural features surveys. It was concluded that the aquatic occurrences within the Beaver Island archipelago systems of Beaver Island are notably unique; were digitized for spatial representation within a there is striking ecological diversity among the Geographic Information System (GIS) following lakes for the relatively small geographic area transcription, updating, and data processing for represented. the statewide Biological and Conservation Plant and natural community surveys were Database (BCD). Sites included known conducted on all of the 1999 island study sites. locations on all significant islands within the Numerous new plant and community archipelago, including Beaver, Garden, High, occurrences were documented, and many Hog, Squaw, Whiskey, and Trout islands as previously known occurrences were located and necessary. updated with current status information. For A prototype conservation planning workshop Beaver Island, four new natural community was designed and conducted for Beaver Island. occurrences (one of open bog, two of mesic A community-based approach was selected, in northern forest, one of dry-mesic northern forest) order to allow residents and other important were documented. Fourteen previously known stakeholders to determine what types and levels occurrences of plant species were located and of MNFI data they would like, what form or updated (two of dwarf lake iris, one of forms it might take, and how to use the available Pumpelly’s brome grass, three of Pitcher’s information most effectively. Ultimately, instead thistle, three of Lake Huron tansy, one of ram’s of one conservation planning workshop, MNFI head ladyslipper orchid, two of butterwort, one developed and organized one presentation as part of beauty sedge, and one of Michigan monkey- of an annual meeting and then conducted an flower). On Garden Island, eight new interactive workshop, the latter open to all occurrences were documented (one of northern Beaver Island residents and interested parties. A wet meadow, two of Great Lakes marsh, one of presentation was given during the 1999 annual Houghton’s goldenrod, two of northern fen, and meeting of the Beaver Island Property Owners two of beauty sedge). Five previously Association (BIPOA), the most active group documented occurrences were relocated and within the community. Approximately 100 updated (one of boreal forest, one of butterwort, people attended the annual meeting. The two of Pitcher’s thistle, one of mesic northern interactive workshop, open to all residents and forest). On Hog Island, five new occurrences stakeholders and held in August, was entitled were documented (one of northern fen, one of “Preserving the Natural Resources and forest-dune swale complex, one of Great Lakes Community Character of Beaver Island”. The marsh, one of dwarf lake iris, and one of latter workshop was prepared and conducted hardwood swamp). Two previously known with the assistance of the Land Information and occurrences were relocated and updated (one of Access Association (LIAA). Fundamental Pitcher’s thistle, one of dry-mesic northern findings and recommendations of the workshop forest). On Marquette and La Salle islands in the included developing an arrival guide to inform Les Cheneaux chain, nine new occurrences were new residents and visitors about the unique documented (three of beauty sedge, one of natural and cultural features on Beaver Island northern fen, two of boreal forest, one of dwarf and surrounding area, and how to be good land lake iris, one of yellow pitcher-plant, and one of stewards. It was also suggested that a user- open dunes). Two previously known friendly electronic kiosk be installed, along with occurrences were relocated and updated (one of instructive brochures for dissemination.
Recommended publications
  • University of Cape Town

    University of Cape Town

    The effects of introduced mice on seabirds breeding at sub-Antarctic Islands Ben J. Dilley Thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Town FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology DST/NRF Centre of Excellence Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science University of CapeCape Town of June 2018 University Supervised by Professor Peter G. Ryan The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derivedTown from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes Capeonly. of Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University Declaration This thesis reports original research that I conducted under the auspices of the FitzPatrick Institute, University of Cape Town. All assistance received has been fully acknowledged. This work has not been submitted in any form for a degree at another university. ………………….................. Ben J. Dilley Cape Town, June 2018 i A 10 day-old great shearwater Ardenna gravis chick being attacked by an invasive House mouse Mus musculus in an underground burrow on Gough Island in 2014 (photo Ben Dilley). ii Table of Contents Page Abstract ....................................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................... vi Chapter 1 General introduction: Islands, mice and seabirds ......................................................... 1 Chapter 2 Clustered or dispersed: testing the effect of sampling strategy to census burrow-nesting petrels with varied distributions at sub-Antarctic Marion Island ...... 13 Chapter 3 Modest increases in densities of burrow-nesting petrels following the removal of cats Felis catus from sub-Antarctic Marion Island ...................................
  • (Apidae, Bombus Spp.) by the Invasive Pitcher Plant Sarracenia Purpurea

    (Apidae, Bombus Spp.) by the Invasive Pitcher Plant Sarracenia Purpurea

    Arthropod-Plant Interactions (2017) 11:79–88 DOI 10.1007/s11829-016-9468-2 ORIGINAL PAPER Exploring the predation of UK bumblebees (Apidae, Bombus spp.) by the invasive pitcher plant Sarracenia purpurea: examining the effects of annual variation, seasonal variation, plant density and bumblebee gender 1 2 1 Elizabeth Franklin • Damian Evans • Ann Thornton • 3 1 1 Chris Moody • Iain Green • Anita Diaz Received: 31 July 2015 / Accepted: 14 October 2016 / Published online: 26 November 2016 Ó The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Invasive carnivorous plant species can impact including that the bumblebees may be using S. purpurea as the native invertebrate communities on which they prey. a resource. Further work is required to establish the exact This article explores the predation of native UK bumble- underpinning mechanisms and the relative roles of plant bees (Bombus spp.) by the invasive pitcher plant species and bumblebee behaviour within the relationship. Such Sarracenia purpurea and discusses the potential effect of S. interaction complexity may have consequences for con- purpurea on native bumblebees. Specifically, it evaluates sideration in invasive carnivorous plant management. whether the extent to which bumblebees are captured varies (i) over successive years, (ii) across June and July, Keywords Pitcher plants Á Bumblebees Á Invasive Á (iii) with density of distribution of pitchers or (iv) with Pollinators bumblebee gender. Pitcher contents were examined from an established population of Sarracenia purpurea growing in Dorset, UK. Results show that the total extent to which Introduction bumblebees were captured differed over the years 2012–2014 inclusive.
  • Checklist of Common Native Plants the Diversity of Acadia National Park Is Refl Ected in Its Plant Life; More Than 1,100 Plant Species Are Found Here

    Checklist of Common Native Plants the Diversity of Acadia National Park Is Refl Ected in Its Plant Life; More Than 1,100 Plant Species Are Found Here

    National Park Service Acadia U.S. Department of the Interior Acadia National Park Checklist of Common Native Plants The diversity of Acadia National Park is refl ected in its plant life; more than 1,100 plant species are found here. This checklist groups the park’s most common plants into the communities where they are typically found. The plant’s growth form is indicated by “t” for trees and “s” for shrubs. To identify unfamiliar plants, consult a fi eld guide or visit the Wild Gardens of Acadia at Sieur de Monts Spring, where more than 400 plants are labeled and displayed in their habitats. All plants within Acadia National Park are protected. Please help protect the park’s fragile beauty by leaving plants in the condition that you fi nd them. Deciduous Woods ash, white t Fraxinus americana maple, mountain t Acer spicatum aspen, big-toothed t Populus grandidentata maple, red t Acer rubrum aspen, trembling t Populus tremuloides maple, striped t Acer pensylvanicum aster, large-leaved Aster macrophyllus maple, sugar t Acer saccharum beech, American t Fagus grandifolia mayfl ower, Canada Maianthemum canadense birch, paper t Betula papyrifera oak, red t Quercus rubra birch, yellow t Betula alleghaniesis pine, white t Pinus strobus blueberry, low sweet s Vaccinium angustifolium pyrola, round-leaved Pyrola americana bunchberry Cornus canadensis sarsaparilla, wild Aralia nudicaulis bush-honeysuckle s Diervilla lonicera saxifrage, early Saxifraga virginiensis cherry, pin t Prunus pensylvanica shadbush or serviceberry s,t Amelanchier spp. cherry, choke t Prunus virginiana Solomon’s seal, false Maianthemum racemosum elder, red-berried or s Sambucus racemosa ssp.
  • Jacqueline Marie Dennett

    Jacqueline Marie Dennett

    Search and rescue: detection and mitigation of rare vascular plant species by Jacqueline Marie Dennett A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Conservation Biology Department of Renewable Resources University of Alberta © Jacqueline Marie Dennett, 2018 Abstract Understanding where and when populations occur is the first step to conservation and maintenance of biodiversity. Where human land-use overlaps with populations of conservation concern, population loss may occur, potentially reducing long-term persistence of species, particularly for those that are rare. Understanding the relationship between land-use change and extirpation is therefore essential to guiding conservation, but this can only be achieved through well-designed surveys and monitoring programs. One key aspect of surveys that is often overlooked is the ability to accurately and consistently detect populations, while the success of mitigation practices depends on a clear understanding of what techniques will best ensure the longevity of a given population. In this thesis, I examined factors that affect detection, extirpation of historic populations, and the efficacy of mitigative translocations for rare vascular plants in the oil sands region of Alberta. First, I used two field experiments to better understand and test the effects of scale (1 – 2500 m2), abundance (plant density), and observer experience on detection rates of rare plants in forested systems. Scale and abundance were the most important determinants of detection for plot-based surveys, whereas previous experience of the observer had limited influence. Plants at low abundance often went unrecorded in large plots (>1000 m2), even when they were morphologically distinct or flowering.
  • Summer Birds of the Les Cheneaux Islands

    Summer Birds of the Les Cheneaux Islands

    Summer Birds of Les Cheneaux Islands 21 SUMMER BIRDS OF THE LES CHENEAUX ISLANDS BY J. VAN TYNE About eleven miles northeast of Macinac Island, along the Lake Huron shore of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, lies a group of islands known as the Les Cheneaux Islands. This group of islands is about eleven miles long and about four wide. They are covered with a second growth, consisting largely of cedar, spruce, hemlock and poplar. The immediately acljacent mainland and parts of Marquette Island contain a considerable amount of cleared land, which of course makes for a greater variety of bird life. The following list is compiled from observations made during June, July and August of the years 1917 to 1921 inclusive. In 1918 the first half of September was also spent there. The only previous list of the birds of these islands seems to be a list of the autumn birds by Mr. Walter C. Wood (Wilson Bulletin, June, 1905 ; March, 1907).’ Allowing for the difference to be expected between the summer and fall birds, the status of a number of birds seems to have changed considerably. 1. PIED-BILLED GREBE-POdilfJ?nbUS podiceps. Noted at Steeles Creek August 29, 1918. 2. LooN-Gavia immer. This species was met with occasionally every summer, especially in the more open water. In 1918 an adult was seen accompanied by sev- eral half-grcrwn young. 3. HERRING Gurx.--Larus argemtatus. A very common summer resident. A nesting colony of several hun- dred on Goose Island, the most isolated of the islands was visited July 3, 1918, when most of the young were hatched and out.
  • Flinders Island Tourism Plan

    Flinders Island Tourism Plan

    F L I N D E R S I S L A N D N A T U R E B A S E D T O U R I S M M A R K E T F E A S I B I L I T Y S T U D Y 1 5 J u n e , 2 0 1 0 Tourism and Recreation PO Box 837, Jindabyne NSW 2627 Planning Specialists [email protected] www.planningforpeople.com.au P 02 6456 2722 F 02 6456 2422 M 0402 152 613 CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND .................................................................................. 4 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................. 4 1.2 Approach to project ........................................................................ 4 1.3 Links to Flinders Island Tourism Plan ................................................ 4 2. SITUATION ANALYSIS ....................................................................... 6 2.1 The island ..................................................................................... 6 2.2 The current nature based tourism offer ............................................. 6 2.3 The Current Visitor ......................................................................... 8 2.4 SWOT analysis ............................................................................. 10 2.5 The Major Challenges ................................................................... 12 3. THE TOURISM CONTEXT .................................................................. 13 3.1 Australian tourism trends .............................................................. 13 3.2 Social and environmental trends ...................................................
  • Misery Bay Chapter 2

    Misery Bay Chapter 2

    Existing Conditions The first step in developing a plan to protect the coastal resources of Misery Bay is to establish an accurate representation of existing cultural and environmental features within the study area. This chapter will present a series of maps and associated text to describe key features such as owner type, land uses, vegetation cover types, soils and geology. NEMCOG used information and digital data sets from the Center for Geographic Information, State of Michigan, Michigan Resource Information System, Alpena Township, Alpena County, Natural Resource Conservation Service, and U.S. Geological Survey. Information from the Alpena County Master Plan and Alpena Township Master Plan was used to develop a profile of existing conditions. Field surveys were conducted during 2003. Community Demographics Trends in population and housing characteristics can provide an understanding of growth pressures in a community. Population trends from 1900 and 2000 are summarized in Table 2.1. Population levels have risen and fallen twice in the last 100 years, first in the early part of the century and again in the 1980’s. The 1980 US Census recorded the largest population for Alpena Township and Alpena County at 10,152 and 32,315 respectively. During the 80’s decade, population fell by over five percent and has not climbed back to the 1980 US Census level. Table 2.1 Population Trends Alpena Township and Alpena County, 1900-2000 Alpena Township Alpena County Year Population % Change Population % Change 1900 1,173 --- 18,254 --- 1910 928 -20.9% 19,965 +9.4% 1920 701 -24.5% 17,869 -10.5% 1930 813 +16.0% 18,574 +3.9% 1940 1,675 +106.0% 20,766 +11.8% 1950 2,932 +75.0% 22,189 +6.9% 1960 6,616 +125.6% 28,556 +28.7% 1970 9,001 +36.0% 30,708 +7.5% 1980 10,152 +12.8% 32,315 +5.2% 1990 9,602 -5.4% 30,605 -5.3% 2000 9,788 +1.9% 31,314 +2.3% Source: U.S.
  • Lakefront & Beach Access Study Report Bay City State

    Lakefront & Beach Access Study Report Bay City State

    April 2015 Approved April 27, 2015 Michigan DNR Parks and Recreation Division Final Draft for approval July 8, 2014 Bay County Prepared with the assistance of: www.clearzoning.com Intentionally blank RESOLUTION NO. 04-2015-01 MICHIGAN STATE PARKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (MSPAC) RESOLUTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE “BAY CITY RECREATION AREA LAKEFRONT & BEACH ACCESS STUDY” ADOPTED: WHEREAS, an extensive planning process was initiated in partnership with Bay County government to identify strategies to enhance the beach recreation value to enhance tourism. WHEREAS, the study was jointly funded by DNR Parks and Recreation and Bay County, WHEREAS, the process included public surveys and meetings and other stakeholder opportunities to develop recommendations, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the MSPAC support the recommendations in the plan for the DNR Parks and Recreation Division to use as a guide for future investments to enhance Bay City Recreation Area. Submitted by: Chris Graham, Chair, MSPAC Stewardship Subcommittee Motioned by: Commissioner Mary Pitcher Yeas: -13- Seconded by: Commissioner Mike Foote Nays: - 0- Abstained: -0 Absent: -2- This resolution was adopted by the Michigan State Parks Advisory Committee at their April 9, 2015 meeting as Resolution No. 04-2015-01. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary Chapter 1: Purpose, Vision and Goals Chapter 2: Planning Team Expertise & Assessments 2.1 Meeting Overviews 2.2 Lakeshore Tour Outcomes 2.3 Changing Ecology of Saginaw Bay Chapter 3: Legal Review/Guiding Resources 3.1 Legal Mandates Review
  • A Review of the Abundance and Distribution of Striated Caracaras Phalcoboenus Australis on the Falkland Islands Micky Reeves &Am

    A Review of the Abundance and Distribution of Striated Caracaras Phalcoboenus Australis on the Falkland Islands Micky Reeves &Am

    A review of the abundance and distribution of Striated Caracaras Phalcoboenus australis on the Falkland Islands Aniket Sardana Micky Reeves & Sarah Crofts Falklands Conservation, May 2015 The authors dedicate this report to Mr. Ian Strange and Mr. Robin Woods whose earlier surveys laid much ground work. This work was funded by: Falklands Conservation is a company limited by guarantee in England & Wales #3661322 and Registered Charity #1073859. Registered as an Overseas Company in the Falkland Islands. Roy Smith “These birds, generally known among sealers by the name of “Johnny” rook, partake of the form and nature of the hawk and crow… Their claws are armed with large and strong talons, like those of an eagle; they are exceedingly bold and the most mischievous of all the feathered creation. The sailors who visit these islands, being often much vexed at their predatory tricks, have bestowed different names upon them, characteristic of their nature, as flying monkeys, flying devils….” Charles Bernard 1812‐13 “A tameness or lack of wariness is an example of the loss of defensive adaptations.... an ecological naiveté…these animals aren’t imbeciles. Evolution has merely prepared them for a life in a world that is simpler and more innocent”…. where humans are entirely outside their experience. David Quammen (Island Biography in an age of extinction) 1996 1 ABSTRACT The Falkland Islands are globally important for the Striated Caracaras (Phalcoboenus australis). They reside mainly on the outer islands of the archipelago in strong associated with seabird populations, and where human interference is relatively low. A survey of the breeding population conducted in the austral summers of 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 indicates that the current population is likely to be the highest it has been for perhaps the last 100 years.
  • Biodiversity of Michigan's Great Lakes Islands

    Biodiversity of Michigan's Great Lakes Islands

    FILE COPY DO NOT REMOVE Biodiversity of Michigan’s Great Lakes Islands Knowledge, Threats and Protection Judith D. Soule Conservation Research Biologist April 5, 1993 Report for: Land and Water Management Division (CZM Contract 14C-309-3) Prepared by: Michigan Natural Features Inventory Stevens T. Mason Building P.O. Box 30028 Lansing, MI 48909 (517) 3734552 1993-10 F A report of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. 309-3 BIODWERSITY OF MICHIGAN’S GREAT LAKES ISLANDS Knowledge, Threats and Protection by Judith D. Soule Conservation Research Biologist Prepared by Michigan Natural Features Inventory Fifth floor, Mason Building P.O. Box 30023 Lansing, Michigan 48909 April 5, 1993 for Michigan Department of Natural Resources Land and Water Management Division Coastal Zone Management Program Contract # 14C-309-3 CL] = CD C] t2 CL] C] CL] CD = C = CZJ C] C] C] C] C] C] .TABLE Of CONThNTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iii INTRODUCTION 1 HISTORY AND PHYSICAL RESOURCES 4 Geology and post-glacial history 4 Size, isolation, and climate 6 Human history 7 BIODWERSITY OF THE ISLANDS 8 Rare animals 8 Waterfowl values 8 Other birds and fish 9 Unique plants 10 Shoreline natural communities 10 Threatened, endangered, and exemplary natural features 10 OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH ON MICHIGAN’S GREAT LAKES ISLANDS 13 Island research values 13 Examples of biological research on islands 13 Moose 13 Wolves 14 Deer 14 Colonial nesting waterbirds 14 Island biogeography studies 15 Predator-prey
  • Beaver-Island.Pdf

    Beaver-Island.Pdf

    -J Anishinaabemowin language: George Trudeau Kchi Miigwetch to additional resource language translators: Ron Wakegijig, Wikwemikong Unceded Indian Reserve Eleanore Rivers, Wikwemikong Unceded Indian Reserve Wilfred (Willy) Trudeau, Wikwemikong Unceded Indian Reserve Language of Ojibwe and Odawa dialect found on Manitoulin Island Ontario, Canada. Story excerpts from the Elders of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians Drawings by Mark Russell Maps by Pauline Barber Front Cover by James McCaan English translation of tape by Pauline Barber Interviews performed by Brian Corbiere, Pauline Barber and assistance from Carrie Leaureaux & Sammie McClellan-Dyal Video camera operators: Charles Nestell, Brian Corbiere, Pauline Barber and assistance from Carrie Leaureaux & Sammie McClellan-Dyal This book was made possible by the Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Native Americans, and a match by the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians. The initial grant team consisted of Carrie Leaureaux, Sammie McClellan-Dyal, Brian Corbiere and Eva Petoskey. r Table of CoiA.teiA.ts Acknowledgements i Map of Beaver Island in relation to Lake Michigan Map of Beaver Island 1 Art Lewis 2 Mary Boulton 5 Pat Wabanimkee 7 Ring of stones 9 Cecelia Boomer Drawing of Rabbit snare ,...10 Ernest Gablow 11 Carolyn Ramey 12 Irene Mitchell 14 Jim Mitchell 15 Helen Paul 16 Gindaaswinan—Island words 17 Vowel-Consonant Syllable Chart 18 References 18 r Beaver Island is located about 30 miles from Charlevoix, Michigan, off the coast of Lake Michigan. Beaver Island is about 15 miles long and 6 miles wide. Gull Island, High Island, Trout Island, Whiskey Island, Garden Island and Hog Island surround Beaver Island, but Beaver Island is the largest of this group of islands.
  • Overview of Tasmania's Offshore Islands and Their Role in Nature

    Overview of Tasmania's Offshore Islands and Their Role in Nature

    Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 154, 2020 83 OVERVIEW OF TASMANIA’S OFFSHORE ISLANDS AND THEIR ROLE IN NATURE CONSERVATION by Sally L. Bryant and Stephen Harris (with one text-figure, two tables, eight plates and two appendices) Bryant, S.L. & Harris, S. 2020 (9:xii): Overview of Tasmania’s offshore islands and their role in nature conservation.Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 154: 83–106. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.154.83 ISSN: 0080–4703. Tasmanian Land Conservancy, PO Box 2112, Lower Sandy Bay, Tasmania 7005, Australia (SLB*); Department of Archaeology and Natural History, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601 (SH). *Author for correspondence: Email: [email protected] Since the 1970s, knowledge of Tasmania’s offshore islands has expanded greatly due to an increase in systematic and regional surveys, the continuation of several long-term monitoring programs and the improved delivery of pest management and translocation programs. However, many islands remain data-poor especially for invertebrate fauna, and non-vascular flora, and information sources are dispersed across numerous platforms. While more than 90% of Tasmania’s offshore islands are statutory reserves, many are impacted by a range of disturbances, particularly invasive species with no decision-making framework in place to prioritise their management. This paper synthesises the significant contribution offshore islands make to Tasmania’s land-based natural assets and identifies gaps and deficiencies hampering their protection. A continuing focus on detailed gap-filling surveys aided by partnership restoration programs and collaborative national forums must be strengthened if we are to capitalise on the conservation benefits islands provide in the face of rapidly changing environmental conditions and pressure for future use.