Genera of Phytopathogenic Fungi: GOPHY 1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Accepted Manuscript Genera of phytopathogenic fungi: GOPHY 1 Y. Marin-Felix, J.Z. Groenewald, L. Cai, Q. Chen, S. Marincowitz, I. Barnes, K. Bensch, U. Braun, E. Camporesi, U. Damm, Z.W. de Beer, A. Dissanayake, J. Edwards, A. Giraldo, M. Hernández-Restrepo, K.D. Hyde, R.S. Jayawardena, L. Lombard, J. Luangsa-ard, A.R. McTaggart, A.Y. Rossman, M. Sandoval-Denis, M. Shen, R.G. Shivas, Y.P. Tan, E.J. van der Linde, M.J. Wingfield, A.R. Wood, J.Q. Zhang, Y. Zhang, P.W. Crous PII: S0166-0616(17)30020-9 DOI: 10.1016/j.simyco.2017.04.002 Reference: SIMYCO 47 To appear in: Studies in Mycology Please cite this article as: Marin-Felix Y, Groenewald JZ, Cai L, Chen Q, Marincowitz S, Barnes I, Bensch K, Braun U, Camporesi E, Damm U, de Beer ZW, Dissanayake A, Edwards J, Giraldo A, Hernández-Restrepo M, Hyde KD, Jayawardena RS, Lombard L, Luangsa-ard J, McTaggart AR, Rossman AY, Sandoval-Denis M, Shen M, Shivas RG, Tan YP, van der Linde EJ, Wingfield MJ, Wood AR, Zhang JQ, Zhang Y, Crous PW, Genera of phytopathogenic fungi: GOPHY 1, Studies in Mycology (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2017.04.002. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Genera of phytopathogenic fungi: GOPHY 1 Y. Marin-Felix 1,2 , J.Z. Groenewald 1, L. Cai 3, Q. Chen 3, S. Marincowitz 2, I. Barnes 4, K. Bensch 1,5, U. Braun 6, E. Camporesi 7,8,9 , U. Damm 10 , Z.W. de Beer 2, A. Dissanayake 11,12 , J. Edwards 13 , A. Giraldo 1,2 , M. Hernández-Restrepo 1,2 , K.D. Hyde 11,14 , R.S. Jayawardena 11,12 , L. Lombard 1, J. Luangsa-ard 15 , A.R. McTaggart 16 , A.Y. Rossman 17 , M. Sandoval-Denis 1,18 , M. Shen 19 , R.G. Shivas 20 , Y.P. Tan 21,22 , E.J. van der Linde 23 , M.J. Wingfield 2, A.R. Wood 24 , J.Q. Zhang 19 , Y. Zhang 19 , P.W. Crous 1,2 1Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, P.O. Box 85167, 3508 AD Utrecht, The Netherlands; 2Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; 3State Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; 4Department of Genetics, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; 5Botanische Staatssammlung München, Menzinger Straße 67, D-80638 München, Germany; 6Martin-Luther-Universität, Institut für Biologie, Bereich Geobotanik und Botanischer Garten, Herbarium, Neuwerk 21, D-06099 Halle (Saale), Germany; 7A.M.B. Gruppo Micologico Forlivese “Antonio Cicognani”, Via Roma 18, Forlì, Italy; 8A.M.B. Circolo Micologico “Giovanni Carini”, C.P. 314, Brescia, Italy; 9Società per gli Studi Naturalistici della Romagna, C.P. 144, Bagnacavallo (RA), Italy; 10 Senckenberg Museum of Natural History Görlitz, PF 300 154, 02806 Görlitz, Germany; 11 Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand; 12 Institute of Plant and Environment Protection, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, PR China; 13 AgriBio Centre for AgriBiosciences, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, 5 Ring Road, LaTrobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia; 14 School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand; 15 Microbe Interaction and Ecology Laboratory, Biodiversity and Biotechnological Resource Research Unit (BBR), BIOTEC, NSTDA 113 Thailand Science Park Phahonyothin Rd., Khlong Nueng, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand; 16 Department of Plant and Soil Science, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; 17 Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; 18 Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Department of Plant Sciences, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa; 19 Institute of Microbiology, P.O. Box 61, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, PR China; 20 Centre for Crop Health, Institute for Agriculture and the Environment, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba 4350, Queensland, Australia; 21 Department of Agriculture & Fisheries, Biosecurity Queensland, Ecosciences Precinct, Dutton Park, QLD 4102, Australia; 22 Microbiology, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands; 23 ARC - Plant Protection Research Institute, Biosystematics Division - Mycology, P. Bag X134, Queenswood 0121, South Africa; 24 ARC - Plant Protection Research Institute, P. Bag X5017, Stellenbosch 7599, South Africa. *Correspondence: Y. Marin-Felix, [email protected], and P.W. Crous, [email protected] Abstract: Genera of Phytopathogenic Fungi (GOPHY) is introduced as a new series of publications in order to provide a stable platform for the taxonomy of phytopathogenic fungi. This first paper focuses on 21 genera of phytopathogenic fungi: Bipolaris, Boeremia, Calonectria, Ceratocystis, Cladosporium, Colletotrichum, Coniella, Curvularia, Monilinia, Neofabraea, Neofusicoccum, Pilidium, Pleiochaeta, Plenodomus, Protostegia, Pseudopyricularia, Puccinia, Saccharata, Thyrostroma, Venturia and Wilsonomyces . For each genus, a morphological description and information about its pathology, distribution, hosts and disease symptoms are provided. In addition, this information is linked to primary and secondary DNA barcodes of the presently accepted species, and relevant literature. Moreover, several novelties are introduced, i.e. new genera, species and combinations,MANUSCRIPT and neo-, lecto- and epitypes designated to provide a stable taxonomy. This first paper includes one new genus, 26 new species, nine new combinations, and four typifications of older names. Key words: DNA barcodes, fungal systematics, phytopathogenic fungi, plant pathology, taxonomy, typifications. Taxonomic novelties: New genus: Verkleyomyces Y. Marín & Crous; New species : Bipolaris saccharicola Y. Marín & Crous, Bi. variabilis Y. Marín & Crous, Boeremia trachelospermi Q. Chen & L. Cai, Calonectria ecuadorensis L. Lombard & Crous, Ca. longiramosa L. Lombard & Crous, Ca. nemoralis L. Lombard & Crous, Ca. octoramosa L. Lombard & Crous, Ca. parvispora L. Lombard & Crous, Ca. tucuruiensis L. Lombard & Crous, Cladosporium chasmanthicola Bensch, U. Braun & Crous, Cl. kenpeggii Bensch, U. Braun & Crous, Cl. welwitschiicola Bensch, U. Braun & Crous, Colletotrichum sydowii Damm, Curvularia pisi Y. Marín & Crous, Cu. soli Y. Marín & Crous, Neofusicoccum italicum Dissanayake & K.D. Hyde, Nm. pistaciicola Crous, Nm. pruni Crous, Pilidium septatum Giraldo & Crous, Pleiochaeta carotae Hern.-Rest., van der Linde & Crous, Plenodomus deqinensis Q. Chen & L. Cai, Protostegia eucleicola Crous, Saccharata leucospermi Crous, S. protearum Crous, Thyrostroma franseriae Crous, Venturia phaeosepta Y. Zhang ter & J.Q. Zhang; New combinations: Coniella hibisci (B. Sutton) Crous, Monilinia mumeicola (Y. Harada, Y. Sasaki & T. Sano) Sandoval-Denis & Crous, M. yunnanensis (M.J. Hu & C.X. Luo) Sandoval-Denis & Crous, Pseudopyricularia bothriochloae (Crous & Cheew.) Y. Marín & Crous, Puccinia dianellae (Dietel) McTaggart & R.G. Shivas, Pu. geitonoplesii (McAlpine) McTaggart & R.G. Shivas, Pu. merrilliana (Syd. & P. Syd.) McTaggart & R.G. Shivas, Pu. rhagodiae (Cooke & Massee) McTaggart & R.G. Shivas, Verkleyomyces illicii Y. Marín & Crous; Typification: Epitypification: Ceratophorum setosum Kirchn. , Coniella musaiaensis var. hibisci B. Sutton, Helminthosporium carpophilum Lév.; Lectotypification: Ceratophorum setosum Kirchn. Available online xxx INTRODUCTION ACCEPTED Since the advent of molecular DNA techniques, many species of phytopathogenic fungi have been shown to represent species complexes or to be included in genera that are poly- or paraphyletic (Crous et al . 2015b). Resolving these generic and species concepts is thus of the utmost importance for plant health and global trade in food and fibre (Crous et al . 2015b, 2016a). The present project focused on genera of fungi that have members causing plant diseases (phytopathogenic), links to a larger initiative called the “The Genera of Fungi project” based on Clements & Shear (1931) (www.GeneraOfFungi.org, Crous et al . 2014a, 2015a, Giraldo et al. 2017), which aims to revise the generic names of all currently accepted fungi (Kirk et al . 2013). ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Of the approximately 18 000 fungal genera that have thus far been described, only around 8 000 are in current use. However, the majority of these were described before the DNA era. To validate the application of these names, their type species need to be recollected and designated as epi- or neotypes with a MycoBank Typification (MBT) number to ensure traceability of the nomenclatural act (Robert et al . 2013). Furthermore, to move to a single nomenclature for fungi (Wingfield et al. 2012, Crous et al. 2015b), their sexual-asexual links also need to be confirmed. The present initiative forms part of the activities of the International Subcommission for the Taxonomy of Phytopathogenic Fungi [Pedro Crous and Amy Rossman