21. the Epistle of 2Peter—3:7-9

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

21. the Epistle of 2Peter—3:7-9 21. The Epistle of 2Peter—3:7-9 (3/27/19) 2 Peter 3:3-4 (NKJV) 3 knowing this first: that scoffers will come in the last days, walking according to their own lusts, 4 and saying, "Where is the promise of His coming? For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of creation." As we come to chapter 3, Peter begins to wind things down by talking about false prophets in particular and many unbelievers in general that will come in the last days scoffing (mocking) at the idea that Jesus is going to come back to the earth literally, physically and interrupt human history by judging the world and establishing His Kingdom. Their mocking, sarcastic question—“Where is the promise of His coming?” betrays their ignorance of the Word of God which contains 500 prophecies (‘promises’) of Jesus’ Second Coming. The statement—“…all things continue as they were from the beginning of creation" is their way of saying that in all of human history God has never intervened to bring judgment on a world-wide scale. But Peter responds in verses 5-6 by saying that these last days critics and mockers willfully ‘forget’ how God has intervened in time past by bringing a sudden catastrophic judgment upon the whole world known as the Flood. This Peter draws on to say that, just as God intervened in human history in the past to judge the world and cleanse it of corruption—so He will do so again in the future: 2 Peter 3:7 (NKJV) 7 But the heavens and the earth which are now preserved by the same word, are reserved for fire until the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men. 1 But as he said in v.4—the critics of this idea will respond with mocking sarcasm—"Where is the promise of His coming?” In other words, “Where is He? You Christians have been talking about Jesus’ return for 2000 years!” Peter responds to these critics (and to those Christians that became impatient waiting for the Lord’s return)— 2 Peter 3:8 (NKJV) 8 But, beloved, do not forget this one thing, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. Now, let me just say first that verse 8 has been used by those who don’t believe that God created the world in 6 literal days—rather they believe in the ‘day/age’ theory and use 2 Peter 3:8 to prove their point. There are many Christians who don’t believe that God created the universe in six literal days. And so, they try to say that the six “days” of creation in Genesis 1—were actually 6 one million or one billion-year periods of time or ages (hence the name—"day/age theory”). They point out that the word ‘day’ is used elsewhere in Scripture to speak of indeterminate periods of time. For example, “the day of the Lord” is an expression used throughout Scripture to signify—not a literal 24-hour day but an extended period of time where God pours out His judgment upon the earth. And again, to prove their contention with regard to this, they point to 2 Peter 3:8 which says— “With the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.” 2 And so, these day/age theorists argue that the 'days' of creation spoken of in Genesis 1 were actually long periods of time or geological ages not literal days. This they say explains how the earth is actually billions of years old instead of the six to ten thousand years in age the Bible seems to indicate that it is (based on the genealogies). Some believe that during these ages theistic evolution took place. (Explain) Others believe that while evolution was taking place in the animal kingdom—late in the process God made man who didn't evolve from apes but simply was made after millions of years of animal evolution. There are numerous problems with the day/age theory view—not the least of which is that death didn't become a reality in the world until Adam's sin (Romans 5:12) therefore evolution driven by death—biblically couldn't have happened before Adam. But even more to the point, nothing in the text implies that these were ages of time on the order of millions or billions of years in length—in fact the language in these verses demonstrates just the opposite. Yes, it is true that the Hebrew word 'yom' translated day in the O.T. can mean an indeterminate period of time and not a literal day—but it's the exception not the rule. By far when the word 'yom' is used in the O.T. it almost always refers to a 24-hour day—and it always refers to a 24 day without exception when it is coupled with a number or the words 'morning' or 'evening'. In Genesis 1, God uses a number and both the words 'morning' and 'evening' to make sure we understand that He is not speaking figuratively but literally—for example: 3 Genesis 1:5 (NKJV) 5 God called the light Day, and the darkness He called Night. So the evening and the morning were the first day. The very same expression, “the evening and the morning were the second day, third day, fourth day" etc. is used for all six days of creation indicating that these days were all the same—literal 24-hour days. If God had wanted to communicate that these were not literal days but rather extended periods of time—He could have easily done so by using different words and phrases. However, if He wanted to communicate that these were literal 24 hour days (as He no doubt did)—He couldn't have made it any clearer from the language He chose to use! And if there was still any confusion as to whether or not God took six literal days when He created the universe, He confirms it in Exodus 20:11 when He was laying down the Sabbath law and how the people of Israel were to work six days a week and the seventh day they were to rest—he said: “For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day...” Obviously, these were literal days and not one million or one billion-year periods—which would have made for a long work week! Since God made it so clear that the days of creation were literal 24-hour days—why then do so many Christian pastors, professors and lay people embrace the day/age theory? It is because they have been convinced that science has proven that the earth is billions of years old and that evolution is true. And because of it they have to make the Bible (and in particular the creation account in Genesis), compatible with the teachings of modern science so that we Christians don't look like backwards, 4 brainless idiots—it’s a capitulation to the scientific ‘wisdom of man’ at the expense of the Word of God. “Yes, but what about 2 Peter 3:8, doesn’t this verse ‘prove’ the day/age theory?” When people try to use 2 Peter 3:8 "…that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day" as a biblical justification for the day/age theory just let them know that this has nothing to do with the creation account in Genesis 1. In verse 8, Peter no doubt had in mind what Moses said in Psalm 90:4: “For a thousand years in Your sight are like yesterday when it is past, and like a watch in the night.” One author— “Peter was simply using a simile. What to people, including scoffers, may seem like a long time is to the Lord very short. The present Church Age has lasted, in God’s eyes, not quite two days!” Another said— “Peter did not give some prophetic formula, saying that a prophetic day somehow equals a thousand years. He instead communicated a general principle regarding how we see time and how God sees time. When people use this verse as a rigid prophetic key it opens the door for great error.” And so, with that in mind, Peter is responding to the critics that will come scoffing at the promise that Jesus will come and bring judgment upon the world before establishing His Kingdom. He said they will mock at that idea since (in our day) Christians have been talking about Jesus’ return for 2000 years—and still, He hasn’t come! However, he points out that, from God’s perspective, it’s only been a couple of days and His promise of Jesus’ Second Coming—is a sure thing! “Yes, but why has the Lord waited 2000 years and still Jesus hasn’t yet come?”— 5 2 Peter 3:9 (NLT2) 9 The Lord isn’t really being slow about his promise, as some people think. No, he is being patient for your sake. He does not want anyone to be destroyed [in hell], but wants everyone to repent. And so, coming back to verse 7— 2 Peter 3:7 (NKJV) 7 But the heavens and the earth which are now preserved by the same word, are reserved for fire until the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
Recommended publications
  • 2 Peter 202 1 Edition Dr
    Notes on 2 Peter 202 1 Edition Dr. Thomas L. Constable HISTORICAL BACKGROUND This epistle claims that the Apostle Peter wrote it (1:1). It also claims to follow a former letter written by Peter (3:1), which appears to be a reference to 1 Peter, although Peter may have been referring to a letter we no longer have.1 The author's reference to the fact that Jesus had predicted a certain kind of death for him (1:14) ties in with Jesus' statement to Peter recorded in John 21:18. Even so, "most modern scholars do not think that the apostle Peter wrote this letter."2 The earliest external testimony (outside Scripture) to Petrine authorship comes from the third century.3 The writings of the church fathers contain fewer references to the Petrine authorship of 2 Peter than to the authorship of any other New Testament book. It is easy to see why critics who look for reasons to reject the authority of Scripture have targeted this book for attack. Ironically, in this letter, Peter warned his readers of heretics who would depart from the teachings of the apostles and the Old Testament prophets, which became the very thing some of these modern critics do. Not all who reject Petrine authorship are heretics, however. The arguments of some critics have convinced some otherwise conservative scholars who no longer retain belief in the epistle's inspiration. "There is clear evidence from the early centuries of Christianity that the church did not tolerate those who wrote in an apostle's name.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Peter 3:19-22
    Dr. Terren Dames 1 Peter 3:19-22 19. In which also He went and made proclamation to the spirits now in prison, There are four main interpretations that have been proposed for this verse. Luther wrote: “A wonderful text is this, and a more obscure passage perhaps than any other in the New Testament, so that I do not know for a certainty just what Peter means.” First, Augustine, and many throughout church history, understood the text to refer to Christ’s preaching ________________ to those who lived while Noah was building the ark. According to this view, Christ was not __________________ but spoke by means of the Holy Spirit through Noah. The spirits are not __________________but refer to those who were snared in sin during Noah’s day. If this view is correct, any notion of Christ descending into hell is excluded. Second, some have understood Peter as referring to Old Testament ______________ and were liberated by Christ between his death and resurrection. Third, some believe Peter here referred to the descent of Christ’s ______________________ between His death and resurrection to offer people who lived before the Flood a _________ chance for _______________. However, this interpretation has no scriptural support. Most of those who adopt such an interpretation infer from this that God will offer a _______________ to all those _____________, especially to those who never heard the gospel. If salvation was offered to the wicked generation of Noah, surely it will also be extended to all sinners separated from God. (Schreiner). Dr. Terren Dames Fourth, the majority view among scholars today is that the text describes Christ’s ______________________ and ___________ over the ___________.
    [Show full text]
  • Burning up Or Being Renewed?:An Exegetical Study of 2 Peter 3:10-13
    Burning up or Being Renewed?: An Exegetical Study of 2 Peter 3:10- 13 and Revelation 21:1-5 from an Environmental/Ecological Perspective Benjamin Aldous, MA student in Global Issues in Contemporary Mission, Redcliffe College Introduction ‘But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, in which the heavens will pass away with a roar and the elements will be destroyed with intense heat, and the earth and its works will be burned up.’ 2 Peter 3:10 [NASV] The Christian faith is deeply eschatological yet there are myriad convictions held as to what will actually take place at the Parousia. Will the earth be destroyed in a final act of Godly wrath by Yahweh or does He have some other intention? Is heaven beyond Jupiter or will heaven be made here on earth? What seems absolutely clear is that our eschatological perspective will have profound implications on how we live and act now? The objective of this paper therefore is to ask how our biblical interpretations colour our praxis. The question might be asked ‘Would Jesus sign the Kyoto agreement?’ Whilst it has been argued that the American administration’s (under Bush) refusal to sign the Kyoto agreement was essentially political and economic, what scope is there for suggesting it is deeply theological too? The religious right in the US make up a large voting block that simply cannot be ignored and with senators like James Inhofe [1] and fundamentalists like Jerry Falwell [2], a balanced theology of the environment seems some way off. Kuzmic (1999, p151) notes, ‘much of evangelical eschatology is very pessimistic about the world, thus marked by a withdrawal from the world.’ It emphasizes a radical break between the present earth and the awaited ‘new heaven and earth.’ Yet other Christian thinkers argue passionately that serious earth care is in fact a reflection of true worship.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Peter 3:1-18 ~ the Day of the Lord ~ Discussion Questions
    2 Peter 3:1-18 ~ The Day of the Lord ~ Discussion Questions 1. When someone promised you something important and then failed to deliver, how did you feel? (Disappointed, angry, resigned, expected it, something else) 2. With what sort of people do you find it difficult to be patient? 3. Why did Peter say he wrote both of his letters? What did he want the readers of the letter (Christian believers) to recall? (3:1-2) 4. What did Peter say would occur in the last days? (3:3) If people mock you or make fun of you, can that discourage your wholesome thinking? 5. What was the argument against the second return of Christ that the scoffers were using? (3:4) 6. How was most of the world once destroyed and how will it be destroyed in the future? (3:5-7) 7. In 3:8, what did Peter tell his readers not to forget? Is this a new idea? (Psalm 90:2-4) 8. We read many places in the Bible about the Lord’s patience. In this particular instance, why does Peter say he is patient? (3:9) Have you personally benefitted from God’s patience? When? How? 9. “The Day of the Lord” is a huge concept and will be a huge event! What does the Bible say about it? (Joel 1:15, 2:10-11, 2:30-31, Amos 5:18-20, Isaiah 2:11, Malachi 4:1, Hebrews 4:13) 10. What reason did Peter give his readers (and you!) for living holy and godly lives? (3:11-13) 11.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 & 2 Peter and Jude (Macarthur New Testament Commentary)
    Table of Contents 1 Peter 2 Peter & Jude 1 PETER MOODY PUBLISHERS/CHICAGO Contents CHAPTER PAGE Preface vii Introduction to 1 Peter 1 1. The Elements of Election (1 Peter 1:1–2) 13 2. The Believer’s Eternal Inheritance (1 Peter 1:3–5) 29 3. Salvation Joy (1 Peter 1:6–9) 39 4. Salvation’s Greatness (1 Peter 1:10–12) 49 5. The Believer’s Response to Salvation (1 Peter 1:13–17) 61 6. The Wonder of Redemption (1 Peter 1:18–21) 71 7. Supernatural Love (1 Peter 1:22–25) 87 8. Desiring the Word (1 Peter 2:1–3) 95 9. Spiritual Privileges—Part 1:Union with Christ and 103 Access to God (1 Peter 2:4–5) 10. Spiritual Privileges—Part 2:Security in Christ, 119 Affection for Christ,Election by Christ,and Dominion with Christ (1 Peter 2:6–9b) 11. Spiritual Privileges—Part 3:Separation to Christ, 127 Possession by Christ,Illumination in Christ,Compassion from Christ,and Proclamation of Christ (1 Peter 2:9c–10) 12. Godly Living (1 Peter 2:11–12) 135 13. Submission to Civil Authority (1 Peter 2:13–17) 143 14. Submission in the Workplace (1 Peter 2:18–21a) 155 15. The Suffering Jesus (1 Peter 2:21b–25) 165 16. Winning an Unsaved Spouse (1 Peter 3:1–7) 175 17. Living and Loving the Good Life (1 Peter 3:8–12) 185 18. Securities Against a Hostile World (1 Peter 3:13–17) 195 19. The Triumph of Christ’s Suffering (1 Peter 3:18–22) 205 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Commentary Text: 2 Peter 3 Context of the Book / Letter / Gospel: ​Peter
    Commentary Text: 2 Peter 3 Context of the book / letter / Gospel: Peter encourages his readers with the promise of Christ’s ​ Second Coming in the midst of their dealing with false teachers. Main Idea of The Text: The issues that believers face in their present circumstance should not ​ be their focus as they look forward to the hope of the return of Christ. Exegetical Outline of The Text I. Jesus Followers Consider the Timing of Christ’s Second Coming -- vv. 1-10. II. Jesus Followers Live Righteously Because of Christ’s Second Coming -- vv. 11-18. Verse by verse commentary: 1 Dear friends, this is now the second letter I have written to you; in both letters, I want to stir up your sincere understanding by way of reminder. Peter’s reference to a second letter is not a reference to 1 Peter, but rather to a different letter. The audience of 2 Peter is different than the audience of 1 Peter, so the letters are obviously different (Walls and Anders, 140). 2 so that you recall the words previously spoken by the holy prophets and the command of our Lord and Savior given through your apostles. Peter encourages his readers to not neglect the words of the Old Testament. Evidently, the false teachers were encouraging his readers to ignore the words of the prophets. Peter continues to encourage them to remember the words of the apostles as well and not allow the false teachers to trick them into thinking the Second Coming would not occur (Walls and Anders, 140).
    [Show full text]
  • The Second Letter of Peter
    THE SECOND LETTER OF PETER VERSE BY VERSE Featuring The RSVCE Catholic Bible Catholic Commentary Catholic Catechism Insights CATECHISM of the CATHOLIC CHURCH (Second Edition, Revised in accordance with the official Latin text promulgated by Pope John Paul II) 1 Table of Contents 2 Peter 1:1 p. 5 2 Peter 1:2 p. 10 2 Peter 1:3 p. 12 2 Peter 1:4 p. 13 2 Peter 1:5-7 p. 14 2 Peter 1:8-9 p. 15 2 Peter 1:10-11 p. 18 2 Peter 1:12-15 p. 20 2 Peter 1:16-18 p. 21 2 Peter 1:19-21 p. 24 2 Peter 2:1 p. 27 2 Peter 2:2 p. 28 2 Peter 2:3 p. 29 2 Peter 2:4 p. 30 2 Peter 2:5 p. 31 2 Peter 2:6 p. 32 2 Peter 2:7-9 p. 33 2 Peter 2:10-11 p. 35 2 Peter 2:12-13 p. 37 2 Peter 2:14 p. 39 2 Peter 2:15-16 p. 40 2 2 Peter 2:17 p. 42 2 Peter 2:18-19 p. 43 2 Peter 2:20 p. 45 2 Peter 2:21-22 p. 46 2 Peter 3:1-2 p. 48 2 Peter 3:3-4 p. 49 2 Peter 3:5-6 p. 51 2 Peter 3:7 p. 52 2 Peter 3:8-9 p. 53 2 Peter 3:10 p. 54 2 Peter 3:11 p. 55 2 Peter 3:12-13 p. 56 2 Peter 3:14 p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chapters of 2 Peter
    Liberty University Scholars Crossing An Alliterated Outline for the Chapters of the Bible A Guide to the Systematic Study of the Bible 5-2018 The Chapters of 2 Peter Harold Willmington Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/outline_chapters_bible Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Willmington, Harold, "The Chapters of 2 Peter" (2018). An Alliterated Outline for the Chapters of the Bible. 42. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/outline_chapters_bible/42 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the A Guide to the Systematic Study of the Bible at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in An Alliterated Outline for the Chapters of the Bible by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2 Peter SECTION OUTLINE ONE (2 PETER 1) Peter opens his letter by exhorting his readers to grow in the knowledge of God and the Scriptures. I. THE PROCLAMATION OF THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF GOD (1:1-4): Peter writes concerning our Christian faith. A. The preciousness (1:1-2): Great value is attached to our faith. B. The power (1:3): God has given us everything we need for living a holy life. C. The promises (1:4) 1. Protection (1:4a): We will be delivered from the corruption of this world. 2. Participation (1:4b): We will actually share in the Lord's divine nature. II. THE MULTIPLICATION OF THE VIRTUES OF GOD (1:5-11): We are to add these virtues to our faith.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of 2 Peter Pastor Jason Gear – Grace Baptist Church Page 1 2
    2 Peter 1 – Continue to Grow Introduction . The theme of this short letter seems to be summarized in the final two verses of chapter 3 – beware, but grow 2 Peter 3:17-18 Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own stedfastness. But grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and for ever. Amen. Chapter one begins with the greeting from the apostle Peter writing to those who faith in Christ . The outline for chapter one leads us through a progression of starting right, continuing well and finishing strong in the Christian life . He concludes the chapter by reminding us of the importance of having the Word of God as our foundation I. Starting Right with a Foundational Faith A. Faith in a Person 2 Peter 1:1-2 Simon Peter, a servant and an apostle of Jesus Christ, to them that have obtained like precious faith with us through the righteousness of God and our Saviour Jesus Christ: Grace and peace be multiplied unto you through the knowledge of God, and of Jesus our Lord, 1. Like precious (equal) faith refers to the faith that we have in a risen Christ is no different than those who had faith who walked with Christ 2. The Savior (Jesus Christ) was the one who provided salvation 3. Only Jesus can supply righteousness, grace and peace B. Faith in God’s Power 2 Peter 1:3 According as his divine power hath given unto us all things that pertain unto life and godliness, through the knowledge of him that hath called us to glory and virtue: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Peter 3: a Preterist Interpretation
    2 Peter 3: A Preterist Interpretation © Evert van Voorthuizen, February 2020. Email: [email protected]. Bible Versions Unless otherwise indicated, all Scripture quotations are from the ESV® Bible (The Holy Bible, English Standard Version®). Copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved. May not copy or download more than 500 consecutive verses of the ESV Bible or more than one half of any book of the ESV Bible. Scripture quotations marked KJV are taken from the 1611 King James Version. Public Domain. (Note: All underlining of Scripture quotations for emphasis has been added by the author.) According to 2 Peter 3, the “day of judgment” or “day of the Lord” will involve the destruction by fire of the heavens and the earth, and of the “elements” (3:7, 10, 12, KJV). In their place will come “new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells” (3:13). The following should guide our interpretation of this difficult chapter: 1. Writing in the 60s AD, Peter is warning about “last days” Jewish scoffers who will soon arise (3:3).1 These scoffers will recall Jesus’ promise to return — alleging its non-fulfillment since 30+ years had already elapsed (3:4). Jesus indeed promised to return in judgment against that generation to destroy their city and temple.2 To his readers Peter points to the Flood to show that judgment, though delayed, will certainly happen. 2. Peter has just linked the certainty of Jesus’ return with his glory seen in his Transfiguration (2Pet 1:16-18).
    [Show full text]
  • HARMONY of the BOOK of JUDE and 2 PETER Chul Hae Kim*
    HARMONY OF JUDE & 2 PETER 20 HARMONY OF THE BOOK OF JUDE AND 2 PETER Chul Hae Kim* Many parallel passages exist among the sixty-six books in the Bible. There are many ways to approach the relationship of each of these parallel passages. The basic principle that applies to any parallel passages in the Bible is that every book of the Bible relates to each other in a certain way. Some relate in the aspect to the time of writing whether written earlier or later: the prior ones could possibly influence the one written later. Others relate in the aspect of authorship as in the case of the Pauline Epistles and Johannine Epistles. On the other hand, we could get the same “smell” from some books even though authors were different but were influenced by each other. The relationship of some parallel passages could be explained based on certain basic principles without any struggle. All the New Testament books have their origin from Old Testament books. It is not only the New Testament books that quote from the Old Testament; Old Testament Books also quote from other books within the Old Testament. 26 Some passages quote directly from the Old Testament books, but some portions of the New Testament books relate indirectly to the Old Testament. There are many ways of quoting from the Old Testament besides direct quotation. Biblical writers use various kinds of allusions: some related to verbal phrases, others in context (including the canonical context), and the rest in main themes or topics. The study of the relationship between parallel passages is worth taking.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Peter 2:4-16
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2014 2 Peter 2:4-16: The Redaction of the Biblical and Intertestamental References Dependent on Jude 5-11 and Their Overall Significance for the Document Jenny Devivo Loyola University Chicago Recommended Citation Devivo, Jenny, "2 Peter 2:4-16: The Redaction of the Biblical and Intertestamental References Dependent on Jude 5-11 and Their Overall Significance for the Document" (2014). Dissertations. Paper 1079. http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/1079 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2014 Jenny Devivo LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO 2 PETER 2:4-16: THE REDACTION OF THE BIBLICAL AND INTERTESTAMENTAL REFERENCES DEPENDENT ON JUDE 5-11 AND THEIR OVERALL SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE DOCUMENT A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN THEOLOGY BY JENNY DE VIVO CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AUGUST 2014 Copyright by Jenny DeVivo, 2014 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my dissertation director, Dr. Wendy J. Cotter, C.S.J., for her assistance and guidance throughout my whole Ph.D. program. She has always demanded my best and has made me a much stronger scholar. I would also like to thank my readers, Dr. Thomas H. Tobin, S.J.
    [Show full text]