DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Ward Patterns Submission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Ward Patterns Submission Rochford District Council September 2014 Rochford District Electoral Review Warding Patterns Submission www.rochford.gov.uk Rochford District Council – Rochford District Electoral Review – Warding Patterns Submission Contents Page Introduction ..................................................................................................... 3 Rochford District Proposed Wards – Tabled Summary ................................... 6 Rochford District Proposed Wards – Mapped ................................................. 7 Rochford District Proposed Wards – Overlayed with Parish Boundaries ........ 8 Appendix 1 – Ward 1 Foulness and the Wakerings ........................................ 9 Appendix 2 – Ward 2(a) Roche South .......................................................... 11 Appendix 3 – Ward 2(b) Roche North ........................................................... 14 Appendix 4 – Ward 3 Rochford Central ........................................................ 17 Appendix 5 – Ward 4 Hawkwell East ............................................................ 19 Appendix 6 – Ward 5 Hawkwell West ........................................................... 22 Appendix 7 – Ward 6 Hockley and Ashingdon .............................................. 25 Appendix 8 – Ward 7 Hockley ....................................................................... 28 Appendix 9 – Ward 8 Hullbridge ................................................................... 30 Appendix 10 – Ward 9 Downhall and Rawreth .............................................. 32 Appendix 11 – Ward 10 Sweyne Park and Grange ....................................... 34 Appendix 12 – Ward 11 Wheatley ................................................................. 36 Appendix 13 – Ward 12 Trinity ...................................................................... 38 Appendix 14 – Ward 13 Lodge...................................................................... 40 2 Rochford District Council – Rochford District Electoral Review – Warding Patterns Submission Introduction Rochford District Background Information The District of Rochford is situated within a peninsula between the Rivers Thames and Crouch, and is bounded to the East by the North Sea. The District has land boundaries with Basildon, Castle Point and Southend-on-Sea Borough Councils. It also has marine boundaries with Maldon and Chelmsford Districts. It is located within south Essex, with linkages to the M25 via the A127 and the A13 and direct rail links to London. The majority of London Southend Airport lies within the District. The Rochford District covers an area of 65 square miles and is home to around 83,000 people. The District is one with an ever-increasing percentage of older residents. It is predominantly rural with three larger urban areas and a number of smaller settlements. The District’s towns and villages are diverse in character reflecting their history, location and size. The character, layout and form of groups of buildings, streets and spaces make a significant contribution to providing a sense of place and adding to the quality of life in town and country. Residents have a strong sense of identity with their own settlement. The District is considered to be reasonably affluent and has, relative, to other areas in the County, few issues affecting it. Council Size On 15 April 2014 Full Council agreed the recommendation from the Working Group to propose to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England (“LGBCE”) that the Council size remains at 39 Councillors. On 22 July 2014, the LGBCE formally confirmed they were minded to recommend this number. Electoral Review Working Group and Wider Council Involvement A Member Working Group was set up by Council on 28 January 2014 with the purpose of making recommendations to Full Council in relation to the electoral review of the District. The group comprises representative Members from all political groups and has met on several occasions in order to make recommendations to Full Council on the issues of Council size, proposed Warding patterns and Ward names. Working Group Members have been fully involved in determining the proposed Warding arrangements in a positive, collaborative fashion and were able to reach consensus in recommending their proposal to Full Council. Save for one Member who has put forward their own proposal to the LGBCE, all Members of Full Council approved the recommendation of the Working Group on 4 September and this forms the basis of the Council’s submission within this document. There has been a generally consensual approach to this task from its inception and the Council is proud of the fact the all groups have put aside political differences to propose Wards which make sense for the electorate and local communities. Members, by virtue of their roles and backgrounds have very good knowledge of the District, particularly the areas they represent. The proposal within this document is very much a reflection of that local knowledge and seeks to create new Wards which provide excellent levels of electoral equality, whilst also maintaining existing community ties. 3 Rochford District Council – Rochford District Electoral Review – Warding Patterns Submission Parishes and Community Identity A Parish is the embodiment a local community. It is for that very reason the Council decided to use Parish Council boundary lines as its main building blocks for proposing new Wards. It is clear from the attached proposal plan that divisions of Parishes have been kept to an absolute minimum. Given the criterion of electoral equality, it was evident that some splits would occur due to electoral numbers being too low or too high by for example using one or more entire Parishes as a building block to create a new Ward. This would have been the case for example if the Parish of Hockley were to be used as a building block for new Ward which alone would have a forecast of 8,042 electors; well in excess of the permitted electoral tolerances. The Council (in collaboration with the LGBCE) has endeavoured to keep Parish/Town Councils and other groups fully engaged with the electoral review process. As well as the LGBCE attending public committee meetings at the start of the process, a Parish focussed meeting was arranged on 5th August 2014 which was attended by the majority of Parishes across the District. Given the District Council’s proposals are predominantly based on Parish boundary lines, it is hoped that this will be acceptable to Parish Councils whose local communities are for the most part being kept entirely intact. Electoral Equality Excellent levels of electoral equality have been achieved for the immediate and longer term. It is only in one proposed Ward where electoral equality has not been achieved for the present electorate, namely Ward 3 Rochford Central. This is because of a major housing development of over 500 dwellings being forecasted to be delivered within six years. As such, it is unavoidable for the present electorate to be over-represented by 20% but is forecast to improve to a level of -2.20% by 2020 and hence the Council is of the view that this is considered acceptable and in line with LGBCE guidance. Save for that isolated example, all other Ward proposals are all well within tolerance and allow considerable room for manoeuvre in the event of population changes which are not quite in accordance with the forecasted figures. Three-Member Wards Approach As the Council operates a system of elections by thirds, it has where practicable proposed Warding arrangements of three Member Wards. This is with the exception of Wards 2(a) Roche South consisting of 1 Member and Ward 2(b) Roche North consisting of two Members. The Working Group and then Full Council determined that for the reasons of effective and convenient local government it would be better to arrange the Wards in this fashion. If the Ward were to be proposed as a single three-Member Ward it would have been by far the biggest Ward in the District and very difficult to represent from a practical point of view. Furthermore, as a three Member Ward it would contain a higher number of distinct Parish Councils/Communities which would potentially lead to increased workloads for those Members. In addition, given the relatively large distances between those communities (as one Ward) there would be little connection between some of those communities, particularly those furthest away from each other. 4 Rochford District Council – Rochford District Electoral Review – Warding Patterns Submission New Ward Names In accordance with LGBCE guidance the proposed Ward names are considered to be distinct and easily identifiable. For example, the split Wards discussed above are named “Roche North” and “Roche South” which is a reflection of geographical features in the areas and very easy to distinguish by the electorate. These names were deliberated upon by the Working Group and Full Council, namely by Council Members who have excellent local knowledge and appreciate the subtleties of prosing apt names for their areas. Post Full Council agreeing the names as shown within the summary table on the following page, a further Member suggestion was put forward in respect of Wards 6 and 7 for the names Hockley East & Ashingdon and Hockley West respectively which the Boundary Commission is asked to note as part of their considerations. 5 Rochford District Council – Rochford District Electoral Review – Warding Patterns Submission Rochford District Proposed Wards – Tabled Summary Ward
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Father of the House Sarah Priddy
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 06399, 17 December 2019 By Richard Kelly Father of the House Sarah Priddy Inside: 1. Seniority of Members 2. History www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 06399, 17 December 2019 2 Contents Summary 3 1. Seniority of Members 4 1.1 Determining seniority 4 Examples 4 1.2 Duties of the Father of the House 5 1.3 Baby of the House 5 2. History 6 2.1 Origin of the term 6 2.2 Early usage 6 2.3 Fathers of the House 7 2.4 Previous qualifications 7 2.5 Possible elections for Father of the House 8 Appendix: Fathers of the House, since 1901 9 3 Father of the House Summary The Father of the House is a title that is by tradition bestowed on the senior Member of the House, which is nowadays held to be the Member who has the longest unbroken service in the Commons. The Father of the House in the current (2019) Parliament is Sir Peter Bottomley, who was first elected to the House in a by-election in 1975. Under Standing Order No 1, as long as the Father of the House is not a Minister, he takes the Chair when the House elects a Speaker. He has no other formal duties. There is evidence of the title having been used in the 18th century. However, the origin of the term is not clear and it is likely that different qualifications were used in the past. The Father of the House is not necessarily the oldest Member.
    [Show full text]
  • Rochford District Council Minutes
    INDEX 1975 January - December r I! IIII ATEIYIgN NOTICES (i) 165 Downhall Road, Rayleigh 450 (ii) 18,36 and 46 Sutton Court Drive, Rochford 606 (iii) 1 and 4 West Cottages,High Street, Canewdon 606 (iv) 30 Sutton Court Drive, Rochford 606 (v) 1 Scotte Hall Parm Cottages, Canewdon 959 (vi) 26 Sutton Court Drive, Roohford 1116 (vii) 3 and 5 Ohuroh 5treet, Rayleigh 1116 (viii) 16 Oakwood Road, Rayleigh 1116 (ix) 2 London Road, Rawretb 1117 (4 White Heather, London Road, Rawreth 1121 Accidents involving Council vehicles S6, 1217 r1218 405 784 801 Annual Local Authority Allotments and Garden Competition 54 Provision of Allotments, Hulibridge 494 Rawreth Shot Allotment Site, Grazing rights 987 ANGLIAN WATER AUTHORITY Capital Schemes 222 Estimates and Charges 223,506 Appointment of Members 295 Technical Schemes 634 Fthnanoial Arrangements 649 Recreational Waterways, Private Bill 786 Collection of General Services Charge 915,1046 Programme of Capital and Minor Works 1170 Unsewered properties l19 Cesspool emptying 223 Antorial Bearings, Grant of Arms 303 Ashingd.on and E.Hawbrell Memorial Hall 203,989 Awarc of Certificates, Royal Society of Health Food Hygiene Course. 507 9N r'!'!1!7'!' 11 '!'•'f BRMIERFON ROKI) - Purchase of 3 acres of land for Community use purposes 664,797,806, 907,1156 BRiTISH RAIL Proposed closure of alternative entrances to Rochford and Hockley rail stations 1016,1181 Broadcasting — Commercial 1086 Budget — 1975 533 BDILDING REGUlATIONS - RThAXATION (i) Meadowside, West Avenue, Hu.llbridge 4 ii) 6 Rookery Close, Rayleigh 5 iii) Southend. Municipal Airport 113 iv) 17 Ferndale Road, Rayleigh 310 v) Ill High Road, Rayleigh 389 vi) 5 Stuart Close, Great Wakaing 471 vii) EEB, London Road, Rayleigh 471 viii) 8 Warwick Road, Rayleigh 471 ix) Southend.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservatives in British Government and the Search for a Social Policy 1918-1923
    71-22,488 HOGAN, Neil William, 1936- THE CONSERVATIVES IN BRITISH GOVERNMENT AND THE SEARCH FOR A SOCIAL POLICY 1918-1923. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1971 History, modern University Microfilms, A XEROX Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED THE CONSERVATIVES IN BRITISH GOVERNMENT AND THE SEARCH FOR A SOCIAL POLICY 1918-1923 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Neil William Hogan, B.S.S., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 1971 Approved by I AdvAdviser iser Department of History PREFACE I would like to acknowledge my thanks to Mr. Geoffrey D.M. Block, M.B.E. and Mrs. Critch of the Conservative Research Centre for the use of Conservative Party material; A.J.P. Taylor of the Beaverbrook Library for his encouragement and helpful suggestions and his efficient and courteous librarian, Mr. Iago. In addition, I wish to thank the staffs of the British Museum, Public Record Office, West Sussex Record Office, and the University of Birmingham Library for their aid. To my adviser, Professor Phillip P. Poirier, a special acknowledgement#for his suggestions and criticisms were always useful and wise. I also want to thank my mother who helped in the typing and most of all my wife, Janet, who typed and proofread the paper and gave so much encouragement in the whole project. VITA July 27, 1936 . Bom, Cleveland, Ohio 1958 .......... B.S.S., John Carroll University Cleveland, Ohio 1959 - 1965 .... U.
    [Show full text]
  • 1973 – Commonwealth Parliamentary Conference
    STAMP HISTORY Commonwealth Parliamentary Conference Date of issue: 12 SEPTEMBER 1973 In early 1970 the Prime Minister, Harold Wilson, confirmed that the United Kingdom Branch of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) would be host to the annual Conference in 1973. This prompted Arthur Bottomly, MP, the Deputy Chairman of the CPA, to write to the Minister of Posts and Telecommunications, John Stonehouse, on 5 February 1970 stating that: ‘The last time that this Conference was held in London was in September, 1961, and to mark the occasion, the Post Office issued two special stamps in denominations of 6d and 1/3. Since then, every Commonwealth host Branch to the Conference has followed the same practice.’ The Managing Director, G H Vieler, replied on 17 February that the proposal had been carefully noted but at present the Post Office was busy with design and production of stamps for 1971. Decisions on the 1973 programme were not likely to be made until early in 1972 but Bottomly was advised that full consideration of his suggestion would be given. On 24 January1972 Sir Bernard Braine, as Deputy Chairman of the CPA, wrote to the Minister of Posts and Telecommunications, Christopher Chataway, saying that it now seemed probable the Queen would open the Conference on Thursday, 13 September 1973 and asked that ‘sympathetic consideration’ be given to ‘the issue of two stamps, one for first class British inland mail, and the other for the minimum Commonwealth air mail’. At the Stamp Advisory Committee (SAC) meeting held on 15 February the members were told that requests had been put forward to include a stamp to mark the CPA Conference in 1973.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation
    ENGLAND’S ANSWER: IDENTITY AND LEGITIMATION IN BRITISH FOREIGN POLICY By STUART STROME A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2014 1 © 2014 Stuart Strome 2 To my grandfather 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my mom, dad, grandparents, and entire family for supporting me through this taxing process. Thank you for being voices of encouragement through can sometimes be a discouraging undertaking. Thank you to the rest of my family for being there when I needed you most. I truly love you all! I would like to thank my professors and colleagues, who provided guidance, direction and invaluable advice during the writing process. They say you don’t get to choose your family yourself, although whoever up there chose it did a wonderful job. I’d like to thank all my colleagues and mentors who provided intellectual inspiration and encouragement. Most specifically, I’d like to thank my dissertation committee, Dan O’Neill, Ido Oren, Aida Hozic, Matthew Jacobs, and above all, my committee chair, Leann Brown. Dr. Brown was incredibly supportive throughout the process, kept me grounded and on track, and provided a shoulder to cry on when needed (which was often!) I’ve never heard of a committee chair that would regularly answer phone calls to field questions, or sometimes just to act as a sounding post with whom to flesh out ideas. You are an inspiration, and I am lucky to have you as a mentor and friend.
    [Show full text]
  • Members 1979-2010
    Members 1979-2010 RESEARCH PAPER 10/33 28 April 2010 This Research Paper provides a complete list of all Members who have served in the House of Commons since the general election of 1979 to the dissolution of Parliament on 12 April 2010. The Paper also provides basic biographical and parliamentary data. The Library and House of Commons Information Office are frequently asked for such information and this Paper is based on the data we collate from published sources to assist us in responding. This Paper replaces an earlier version, Research Paper 09/31. Oonagh Gay Richard Cracknell Jeremy Hardacre Jean Fessey Recent Research Papers 10/22 Crime and Security Bill: Committee Stage Report 03.03.10 10/23 Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Bill [HL] [Bill 79 of 2009-10] 08.03.10 10/24 Local Authorities (Overview and Scrutiny) Bill: Committee Stage Report 08.03.10 10/25 Northern Ireland Assembly Members Bill [HL] [Bill 75 of 2009-10] 09.03.10 10/26 Debt Relief (Developing Countries) Bill: Committee Stage Report 11.03.10 10/27 Unemployment by Constituency, February 2010 17.03.10 10/28 Transport Policy in 2010: a rough guide 19.03.10 10/29 Direct taxes: rates and allowances 2010/11 26.03.10 10/30 Digital Economy Bill [HL] [Bill 89 of 2009-10] 29.03.10 10/31 Economic Indicators, April 2010 06.04.10 10/32 Claimant Count Unemployment in the new (2010) Parliamentary 12.04.10 Constituencies Research Paper 10/33 Contributing Authors: Oonagh Gay, Parliament and Constitution Centre Richard Cracknell, Social and General Statistics Section Jeremy Hardacre, Statistics Resources Unit Jean Fessey, House of Commons Information Office This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual.
    [Show full text]
  • Member Since 1979 191
    RESEARCH PAPER 09/31 Members since 1979 20 APRIL 2009 This Research Paper provides a complete list of all Members who have served in the House of Commons since the general election of 1979, together with basic biographical and parliamentary data. The Library and the House of Commons Information Office are frequently asked for such information and this Paper is based on the data we collate from published sources to assist us in responding. Since this Paper is produced part way through the 2005 Parliament, a subsequent edition will be prepared after its dissolution to create a full record of its MPs. The cut off date for the material in this edition is 31 March 2009. Please note that a new edition of this Research Paper is now available entitled: Members 1979-2010 [RP10/33] Oonagh Gay PARLIAMENT AND CONSTITUTION CENTRE HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers include: 09/16 Saving Gateway Accounts Bill: Committee Stage Report 24.02.09 09/17 Autism Bill [Bill 10 of 2008-09] 25.02.09 09/18 Northern Ireland Bill [Bill 62 of 2008-09] 02.03.09 09/19 Small Business Rate Relief (Automatic Payment) Bill [Bill 13 of 03.03.09 2008-09] 09/20 Economic Indicators, March 2009 04.03.09 09/21 Statutory Redundancy Pay (Amendment) Bill [Bill 12 of 2008-09] 11.03.09 09/22 Industry and Exports (Financial Support) Bill [Bill 70 of 2008-09] 12.03.09 09/23 Welfare Reform Bill: Committee Stage Report 13.03.09 09/24 Royal Marriages and Succession to the Crown (Prevention of 17.03.09 Discrimination) Bill [Bill 29 of 2008-09] 09/25 Fuel Poverty Bill
    [Show full text]
  • Philately in Essex 2019 Volume 3
    AEPS CATALOGUE OF ESSEX PHILATELIC COLLECTIBLES 2019 Volume 3 of PHILATELY IN ESSEX 2019 “The Blue Book” Members' Handbook of the Association of Essex Philatelic Societies (2019 Eighth Edition) (Incorporating Amendments to 1 December 2018) 2 Philately In Essex 2019 Editor: L.C. Stanway FRPSL. Published by Association of Essex Philatelic Societies, 25 Clay Hill Road, Basildon, Essex, SS16 5DD, Great Britain. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. First Edition 1986 For a full publication list, please refer to Volume 1. © AEPS 1986-2019 Philately In Essex 2019 3 PHILATELY IN ESSEX THE HANDBOOK OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ESSEX PHILATELIC SOCIETIES PREFACE TO THE EIGHTH EDITION, VOLUME 3 When Philately in Essex was first published in 1985, CHANGES IN THIS EDITION we sought to produce a single reference volume, but this subsequently became unwieldy as we found more The catalogue has been updated with new entries, about the Association’s past. The move to a digital including 3.8b, 7.5a, 8.14a, 15.5b, 17.6a 17.18aa, format allowed and encouraged us to be more flexible 18.3a, 19.8b, 22.35a, 24.14a, 24.32a, 26.4a, 29.31, in our approach. We therefore extracted the historical 31.7a, 56.2a. Ipswich society issues have been information into separate volumes which can be renumbered as a large number of previously- updated less frequently, when sufficient new unrecorded issues have now been listed. This year information is available to justify a new edition. As this has seen further new discoveries among the early year is the seventy-fifth anniversary of the founding of issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Determination and Self-Governance for Communities Relocated Across International Borders: the Quest for Banaban Independence
    international journal on minority and group rights 24 (2017) 428-466 brill.com/ijgr Self-determination and Self-governance for Communities Relocated across International Borders: The Quest for Banaban Independence Jane McAdam Scientia Professor of Law, Director of the Andrew & Renata Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law, Faculty of Law, University of Sydney, Australia Abstract In 1945, the small Banaban community of Ocean Island (Banaba) in present-day Kiri- bati was relocated to Rabi Island in Fiji. The Balabans were ostensibly moved due to irreversible damage done to Ocean Island during Japanese occupation in the Second World War. However, this was largely a convenient excuse to facilitate the wholesale phosphate mining of the island by the British Phosphate Commission, a consortium of the British, Australian and New Zealand governments. The Banaban relocation pro- vides a rare example of a whole community seeking to re-establish itself in another State. This article charts the Banabans’ bids for independence during the 1960–70s, revealing novel responses to complex questions of self-determination and governance, including legal status, nationality, political representation, and rights to land and re- sources. While their experience cannot be universalised, it is relevant to contemporary deliberations about the possible future relocation of Pacific communities impacted by climate change. * This research was funded by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship. Thank you to Sophie Duxson, Catie Gilchrist and Henry Hawthorne
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion Law Reform in Britain 1964-2003: a Personal Account by David Paintin
    Abortion law reform in Britain 1964-2003: A personAl Account by David paintin Hon FFSRH MB ChB FRCOG Emeritus Reader in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of London Abortion law reform in Britain 1964-2003: A personAl Account by David paintin Hon FFSRH MB ChB FRCOG Emeritus Reader in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of London Published by British Pregnancy Advisory Service (bpas), 20 Timothys Bridge Road, Stratford Enterprise Park, Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire CV37 9BF May 2015 © British Pregnancy Advisory Service 2 contents Acknowledgements 5 Foreword. By Ann Furedi, chief executive, British pregnancy Advisory service 6 chapter 1. Forming an opinion, 1955 – 1963 8 Providing induced abortion in London, 1963 – 1967 10 Becoming a member of the Abortion Reform Association (ALRA) 11 chapter 2. lord silkin’s Medical termination of pregnancy Bills, 1965 – 1966 13 Lord Silkin’s First Bill 13 Planning amendments for the Committee Stage 16 The fall of the Bill and an analysis of its shortcomings 20 Lord Silkin’s Second Bill 21 chapter 3. supporting David steel’s Abortion Bill, 1966 – 1968 25 Preparing for the Committee Stage 29 The December crisis 34 Comments on the amendments tabled for the committee stage of the Abortion Bill 38 The role of ALRA, and the medico-legal advisors 44 Standing Committee F: January to April 1967 47 ALRA accepts the aims of the Steel Bill 48 The Steel Bill in the Lords 51 Final approval by the House of Commons 52 chapter 4. Implementing the Act 53 The Abortion Regulations 1968 53 The recognition of approved
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL BC Chelmsford 20161101 with Index
    BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND PROCEEDINGS AT THE 2018 REVIEW OF PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCIES IN ENGLAND HELD AT CIVIC CENTRE, DUKE STREET, CHELMSFORD, CM1 1JE ON TUESDAY 1 NOVEMBER 2016 DAY TWO Before: Ms Sarah Hamilton, The Assistant Lead Commissioner ______________________________ Transcribed from audio by W B Gurney & Sons LLP 83 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0HW Telephone Number: 0203 585 4721/22 ______________________________ Time Noted: 9.00 am THE LEAD ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER: Good morning, everybody. My name is Sarah Hamilton and I will be chairing today’s public hearing in Chelmsford on Day Two of the Boundary Commission hearing. We were due to start at nine o’clock this morning to hear from members of the public, but at the moment we do not have anyone booked in, so I am going to adjourn until 10.00 am. Thank you. Time noted: 9.00 am After a short break Time noted: 10.00 am THE LEAD ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER: Good morning again, everyone. It is now ten o’clock on Day Two in Chelmsford. As there are no members of the public who wish to speak at this time I am going to adjourn until 11.00 am. Thank you. Time noted: 10.00 am After a short break Time noted: 11.00 am THE LEAD ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER: Good morning again, ladies and gentlemen. For the purposes of people who have just joined the room my name is Sarah Hamilton and I will be chairing this morning’s hearing, which is Day Two in Chelmsford of the Boundary Commission public hearing. We have a member of the public who wishes to speak, Mr Jeater.
    [Show full text]
  • "Father" of the House of Commons, the Inverted Commas Possibly Indicating the Informality of the Description
    Factsheet M3 House of Commons Information Office Members Series The Father of the Revised June 2010 House Contents Introduction 2 This Factsheet has been archived so the Seniority of Members 2 Duties of the Father of the House 2 content and web links may be out of History 3 date. Please visit our About Parliament Origin of the term 3 pages for current information. Early usage 3 Fathers of the House 4 Qualification 4 Elections 5 Appendix A 8 Fathers of the House since 1874 8 The Father of the House is a title that is by Appendix B 9 “Fathers of the House” from 1700 tradition bestowed on the senior Member 9 of the House, which is nowadays held to be Further reading 10 the Member who has the longest unbroken Contact information 10 Feedback form 11 service in the Commons. This Factsheet discusses the duties associated with the post and its history. June 2010 FS No.M3 Ed 3.6 ISSN 0144-4689 © Parliamentary Copyright (House of Commons) 2010 May be reproduced for purposes of private study or research without permission. Reproduction for sale or other commercial purposes not permitted. 2 The Father of the House House of Commons Information Office Factsheet M3 Introduction The title of Father of the House is held by the Member who has the longest unbroken service in the House of Commons. Currently the Father of the House is Sir Peter Tapsell who was first elected in October 1959 and has served continuously since 1966. The term Father of the House is not defined in House of Commons Standing Orders, although Standing Order No 1 uses the same qualification.
    [Show full text]