Report of an Aboriginal Heritage Survey of Lots Associated with the Glen Iris - Moorlands Structure Plan, Bunbury, Western Australia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
REPORT OF AN ABORIGINAL HERITAGE SURVEY OF LOTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE GLEN IRIS - MOORLANDS STRUCTURE PLAN, BUNBURY, WESTERN AUSTRALIA A report prepared for MPM Development Consultants upon behalf of CM Piacentini By Mr Brad Goode Consulting Anthropologist 79 Naturaliste Terrace DUNSBOROUGH WA 6281 [email protected] Mrs Jacqueline Harris Consulting Archaeologist 26 Camelia Street NORTH PERTH WA 6006 [email protected] Report submitted February 2013 to: Mr Craig Pippin Senior Engineer MPM Development Consultants PO Box 2035 107 Beach Road BUNBURY WA 6231 The Registrar Department of Indigenous Affairs PO Box 3153 151 Royal Street EAST PERTH WA 6892 REPORT OF AN ABORIGINAL HERITAGE SURVEY OF LOTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE GLEN IRIS – MOORLANDS STRUCTURE PLAN, BUNBURY, WESTERN AUSTRALIA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank the following organisations and individuals who helped with the management of this Aboriginal heritage survey. • Ms Shelley Coutts – MPM Development Consultants (Project Manager and Director) • Mr Craig Pippin – MPM Development Consultants (Senior Engineer) • Mr Sean O’Hara – South West Aboriginal Land & Sea Council (Senior Heritage Officer) • Mr Simon Keenan – Department of Indigenous Affairs (Senior Heritage Officer) • Dr Moya Smith – Western Australian Museum (Anthropologist) • Ms Mel Lamanna – Brad Goode & Associates Pty Ltd (Assistant) • Ms Lisa Butcher– Brad Goode & Associates Pty Ltd (Assistant) Gnaala Karla Booja WC98/58 Native Title Claim group representatives Ethnographic survey informants: • Mr Greg Winmar • Mr Les Wallam • Ms Dawn Alone • Mr Joe Northover • Ms Annette Garlett • Ms Sandra Nebro • Ms Barbara Corbett- Councillor-Stamner (Barbara Corbett) DISCLAIMER All of the information contained in this report is believed to be correct and accurate at the time it was recorded. The author does not take responsibility or accept any liability for errors or omissions contained in the report based upon information supplied by others. *Note: This report, in terms of its assessment under section 5 of the Western Australian Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972, should be read in conjunction with the archaeological report by Harris (2013). COPYRIGHT This report and the information contained herein, is subject to Copyright and may not be copied in whole or part without the written consent of the copyright holders, being Brad Goode and Associates Pty Ltd, MPM Development Consultants, CM Piacentini and Gnaala Karla Booja WC98/58 Native Title Claim group members who contributed to the survey. GLOSSARY OF TERMS The Proponent – CM Piacentini The Consultant – Brad Goode & Associates Pty Ltd AHA – Western Australian Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 AHR – Aboriginal Heritage Regulations 1974 DIA – Department of Indigenous Affairs ACMC – Aboriginal Cultural Material Committee SWALSC – South West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council GKB – Gnaala Karla Booja CHMP – Cultural Heritage Management Plan WAM – Western Australian Museum POS – Public Open Space 1 REPORT OF AN ABORIGINAL HERITAGE SURVEY OF LOTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE GLEN IRIS – MOORLANDS STRUCTURE PLAN, BUNBURY, WESTERN AUSTRALIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CM Piacentini (‘the proponent’) is proposing to develop a residential subdivision upon Lots 317, 316, 315, 310, 314, 202, 312, 32, 61, and 62 at Glen Iris in Bunbury. The agents for the proponent, MPM Development Consultants, have commissioned Brad Goode and Associates to conduct a ‘Site Identification’ Aboriginal heritage survey, in order to determine whether any sites or places of significance, as defined by section 5 of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 would be affected. The subject lots are bounded by the Preston River to the west, Moorlands and Jeffrey Roads to the northeast, Vittoria Road to the east and the Preston River and Kaeshagen Street to the south. The total survey area is 48.2 hectares. As a result of archival research there are no previously recorded ethnographic Aboriginal heritage sites or places located within the development area. One archaeological site and one archaeological other heritage place was identified to be located within the development area. The DIA extent for Other Heritage Place ID 4917 Bunbury 06 (Artefact) affects – Lot 310. The DIA extent of Site ID 5449 Moorland Bunbury (Burial) extent affects – Lots 202, 310, 315, 314, 313, and 312 (see Harris (2013) for details). Archival research has also determined that DIA site ID 19795 Preston River will be potentially affected by any obligations that the proponent may have in managing the section of ‘Regional Open Space’ (Lot 313) that separates the development area from the Preston River. Ground disturbing activities associated with this management may require consent under the AHA. As a result of consultations with the seven nominated representatives of GKB native title claim group and in relation to these archaeological sites, the Nyungar community have defined that these places represent a highly significant cultural landscape that marks their ancestors’ connection to the area, and their social historical associations with community and kin. In particular the large Marri tree located on the south-eastern side of the Other Heritage Place ID 4917 Bunbury 06 has become the cultural symbol that now signifies and connects the contemporary Nyungar community to this landscape. In terms of the development proposal and its affect upon the defined cultural values it is highly likely that the whole of the dune containing archaeological material and the former burial will undergo extensive modification, even if it is preserved as a park within the 10% requirement for ‘Public Open Space.’ In terms of mitigation the Nyungar community request that the sub-surface archaeological potential be investigated. This would assist interpretation of the social and scientific values that would otherwise be lost to the community from the sites destruction. Post development a further mitigative strategy would be for the proponent to commission detailed historic and oral historic research as a basis for interpretation. This would assist the Nyungar community to understand the prehistoric to historic context of their ancestors’ lives in the area and the contribution made to the regions development. In terms of the development proposal the Nyungar community would obviously wish the site and place to be preserved, however should the development proceed and should the site and place be destroyed, the final planning should be done in close consultation with the Gnaala Karla Booja working party at SWALSC. 2 REPORT OF AN ABORIGINAL HERITAGE SURVEY OF LOTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE GLEN IRIS – MOORLANDS STRUCTURE PLAN, BUNBURY, WESTERN AUSTRALIA As a result of the above survey the following recommendations can be made: Should the proponent wish to proceed with planning to urbanise the above lots (where Aboriginal heritage sites and places exist) it is recommended that further planning is done in close consultation with members of the GKB native title claim group in order to minimise the effects to ethnographic and archaeological cultural heritage values. Further consultation will be required in order that the GKB native title claim group members can assess how the final plans will affect these values prior to supporting a section 18 application under the AHA. At present the GKB native title group are not in support of the proponent seeking such consent. It is recommended that once a consensus upon management of these values is reached that the proponent will be required to make application under section 18 of the Western Australian Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 for consent to use the land that may contain an Aboriginal Site, Site ID 5449 (Burial) and Other Heritage Place ID 4917 Bunbury 06 (Artefact). Should consent be given the following management requests should be given due consideration by the ACMC as conditions: • That the proponent protects the Marri tree and as much of the dune that contains artefacts around the tree as possible as within POS. • That the skeletal remains salvaged are to be returned to this site and reburied near the tree with an appropriate ceremony. • That the wetlands on Lots 317, 316, 315 and 32 are protected and revegetated with indigenous species. • That all excavations and ground clearing work located within the DIA extent of the sites and places are subjected to archaeological monitoring, recording and salvage, with all material salvaged returned to the POS around the tree. • That the POS is landscaped into a memorial park with a Nyungar theme and historical interpretative signage is provided that outlines the significance of the area to the GKB native title claim group. 3 REPORT OF AN ABORIGINAL HERITAGE SURVEY OF LOTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE GLEN IRIS – MOORLANDS STRUCTURE PLAN, BUNBURY, WESTERN AUSTRALIA CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................ 1 GLOSSARY OF TERMS ........................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 2 CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................. 4 ISSUE ........................................................................................................................................... 6 REPORT OBJECTIVES ...........................................................................................................