"An Insect View of Its Plain": Nature and Insects in Thoreau, Dickinson, and Muir Rosemary S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Spring 2009 "An Insect View of its Plain": Nature and Insects in Thoreau, Dickinson, and Muir Rosemary S. McTier Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation McTier, R. (2009). "An Insect View of its Plain": Nature and Insects in Thoreau, Dickinson, and Muir (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/916 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “AN INSECT VIEW OF ITS PLAIN”: NATURE AND INSECTS IN THOREAU, DICKINSON, AND MUIR A Dissertation Submitted to the McAnulty College and Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Rosemary Scanlon McTier May 2009 Copyright by Rosemary Scanlon McTier 2009 “AN INSECT VIEW OF ITS PLAIN”: NATURE AND INSECTS IN THOREAU, DICKINSON, AND MUIR By Rosemary Scanlon McTier Approved March 10, 2009 ________________________________ ________________________________ Frederick Newberry Elaine Frantz Parsons Professor of English Assistant Professor of History Dissertation Director Committee Member ________________________________ ________________________________ John Dolis Linda Kinnahan Professor of English and American Studies Professor of English Penn State, Scranton Committee Member Committee Member ________________________________ ________________________________ Albert C. Labriola Magali Cornier Michael Dean, McAnulty College and Graduate Chair, Department of English School of Liberal Arts Professor of English Professor of English iii ABSTRACT “AN INSECT VIEW OF ITS PLAIN”: NATURE AND INSECTS IN THOREAU, DICKINSON, AND MUIR By Rosemary Scanlon McTier May 2009 Dissertation Supervised by Frederick Newberry, Professor of English The simultaneous emergence of ecocriticism and cultural entomology has created a critical need for a discussion of the appearance and function of insects as they appear in literature. While nineteenth-century nature writing is frequently examined by ecocritics, very few have chosen to explore how critical writers such as Henry David Thoreau, Emily Dickinson, and John Muir incorporate insects into their work. This study explores three interrelated issues connected to encounters with and explorations of the microscopic and unacknowledged position of insects in nature: first, how insects factor into their growing knowledge about nature and ecology; second, how nature serves as a conduit to or inspiration for spirituality, revealing in its intricate processes the messages of the divine; and third, how insects are important not only for their critical ecological function but also for their symbolic value in suggesting the possibility of a renewed connection and relationship with the natural world and God, either through an awareness of iv ecological integration, an acknowledgement that all life participates in a joyous celebration of creation and has a right to exist, or a metamorphic process that unites the physical and spiritual in an attempt to transcend earthly experience. The introduction of this dissertation discusses how the evolution of ecocriticism establishes the legitimacy and importance of an insect’s “point of view.” Chapter one provides a partial “cultural portrait” of insects in the nineteenth century, examining insects in science, agriculture, folklore, fashion, religion, and literature. Chapter two focuses on Thoreau’s interpretation of the song of the crickets as a universal choir which nature continually invites humanity to join, on his interest in the reflective eyes of the water-skaters of Walden and their ability to exist between the margins of heaven and earth, and on his fascination with the process of metamorphosis in relation to both insects and human potential. Chapter three explores Dickinson’s vision of nature as an interdependent society of insects, animals, and plants, each having an important and unique purpose to fulfill, and her complex attitude toward cocoons and metamorphosis, especially in relation to her fear of death and uncertainly about salvation. Chapter four establishes Muir as a true “lover of nature” who views insects and all other “citizens” of creation as his “brothers,” equal members in a creation designed and lovingly maintained by God. Muir is especially interested in bees, attempting to adopt their point of view when he describes the flowers of California and idealizing apiculture as a form of agriculture in harmony with the needs of both nature and humanity. v DEDICATION For Pam, Dave, and Shea, who continue to live in joy. May they always find Leah in the rainbows. And for Grandma Rose, who never lost hope. vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation has been years in the making, and more people have extended their support and knowledge than I can possibly begin to recognize here. First, I am eternally grateful to the Director of my dissertation, Professor Frederick Newberry, who exhibited endless patience and compassion and offered priceless and much appreciated encouragement and advice. I must also extend my gratitude to the members of my Dissertation Committee, Professor John Dolis, Professor Elaine Parsons, and Professor Linda Kinnahan, for their time and assistance in helping me clarify my ideas and overall presentation and to Albert Labriola and Magali Michael for believing in me and my project. Tammy Horn very kindly allowed me to peruse the notes for her forthcoming book, and I am thankful for her thoughtfulness, encouragement, and input. I would also like to thank my grandmother, Rosemary Arrisher, my mother, JoAnn Scanlon, my aunt, Diane McLaughlin, my spouse, James Lindstrom, and most of all my daughter, Moiya, for their support and confidence. I will always appreciate the help of the staff at Eberly Library for their swift attention to my many requests and queries, and I will never forget the kindness and encouragement of my colleagues and friends, Dr. Jamie Dessart, Dr. Marilyn Roberts, Dr. Jenny Jellison, Charles Beiter, Jennifer Foradori, Elizabeth Williamson, Regina Davis, Beth Merry, Jill Sunday, Susan Biddle, Jan Teagarden, Pam Abbe, Ella Belling, Lance Smith, Phillip Coss, Heather Cummings, Donna Carcella, Carol Salai, Jet’aime Gantt McTier, Aaron Youngblood, Cass Eaton, Vern Toland, Annabel Moats, and Drew Nicksich. I am most especially indebted to Dr. Nicole Andel, vii who offered invaluable advice and assistance and, above all else, kept me (somewhat) sane. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract . iv Dedication . vi Acknowledgment . vii Textual Abbreviations . xi Numeration of Emily Dickinson’s Poems . .xiii Introduction: Henry David Thoreau, Emily Dickinson, and John Muir: Interpreting the Language of Nature . .1 Chapter I: Insects and the Nineteenth Century . 26 Cultural Entomology and the Nineteenth Century . 26 The Growth of American Entomology . 33 American Apiculture . 39 Insect Infestations . 43 Insects in Folklore . 48 Insects in Fashion and Egyptology . 51 Insects in the Bible . 54 Insects in Literature . 60 Chapter II: “With Microscopic Eye”: Thoreau’s Insect Perspective . 68 “Bear[ing] the Closest Inspection”: Thoreau’s Scientist-Saunterer . 68 “The Interjections of God”: Crickets in “Natural History of Massachusetts” and the Journal . 82 “Myriad Eyes Suitably Placed”: The Water-skaters of Walden . .90 ix “What Will Be Hatched Within Me?”: Walden and Metamorphosis . .103 Chapter III: “A Minor Nation”: Emily Dickinson and the Insects’ Society . .117 “Whatsoever Insect pass -”: Dickinson’s Entomological Poetry . 117 “They make me regret I am not a Bee -”: Dickinson and Nature’s People . 135 “From Cocoon forth a Butterfly”: Dickinson and Metamorphosis . .160 Chapter IV: John Muir: Translating “Nature’s Book” . .175 “Made of the Same Dust as We”: Nature’s Equality . .175 “To See Better What the Sun Sees”: Muir’s Divine Vision . .181 “In the Eyes of a Bee”: The “Bee-garden” of California . 206 Conclusion: The Entomological Intersections of Thoreau, Dickinson, and Muir . 209 Endnotes . 224 Works Cited . 245 x TEXTUAL ABBREVIATIONS E Ralph Waldo Emerson, “Nature,” in Essays and Lectures: Nature: Addresses and Lectures/ Essays: First and Second Series/ Representative Men/ English Traits/ The Conduct of Life. New York: Library of America, 1983. B John Muir, The Story of My Boyhood and Youth, in John Muir: Nature Writings, ed. William Cronon. New York: Library of America, 1997. F John Muir, My First Summer in the Sierra, in John Muir: Nature Writings, ed. William Cronon. New York: Library of America, 1997. G John Muir, A Thousand Mile Walk to the Gulf. 1916. Ed. William Frederic Bade. New York: Mariner Books, 1998. JM John Muir, John of the Mountains: The Unpublished Journals of John Muir, ed. Linnie Marsh Wolfe. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1979. MC John Muir, The Mountains of California, in John Muir: Nature Writings, ed. William Cronon. New York: Library of America, 1997. NP John Muir, Our National Parks. 1901. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books, 1991. WW John Muir, “Wild Wool,” in John Muir: Nature Writings, ed. William Cronon. New York: Library of America, 1997. NH Henry David Thoreau, “Natural History of Massachusetts,” in “A Natural History of Massachusetts,” “Wild Apples” and Other
Recommended publications
  • Rainfall and Parasitic Wasp (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea
    Agricultural and Forest Entomology (2000) 2, 39±47 Rainfall and parasitic wasp (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) activity in successional forest stages at Barro Colorado Nature Monument, Panama, and La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica B. A. Shapiro1 and J. Pickering Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2602, U.S.A. Abstract 1 In 1997, we ran two Malaise insect traps in each of four stands of wet forest in Costa Rica (two old-growth and two 20-year-old stands) and four stands of moist forest in Panama (old-growth, 20, 40 and 120-year-old stands). 2 Wet forest traps caught 2.32 times as many ichneumonoids as moist forest traps. The average catch per old-growth trap was 1.89 times greater than the average catch per second-growth trap. 3 Parasitoids of lepidopteran larvae were caught in higher proportions in the wet forest, while pupal parasitoids were relatively more active in the moist forest. 4 We hypothesize that moisture availability is of key importance in determining parasitoid activity, community composition and trophic interactions. Keywords Barro Colorado Nature Monument, Ichneumonoidea, La Selva, parasitoids, precipitation, tropical moist forest, tropical wet forest. istics of each parasitoid species and abiotic factors. Seasonal Introduction patterns of insect activity are often correlated with temperature, One of the largest groups of parasitic Hymenoptera is the as processes such as development and diapause are often superfamily Ichneumonoidea, which consists of two families intimately associated with temperature change (Wolda, 1988). (the Ichneumonidae and the Braconidae), 64 subfamilies and an Fink & VoÈlkl (1995) gave several examples of small insects for estimated 100 000 species world-wide (Gauld & Bolton, 1988; which low humidity and high temperature have detrimental Wahl & Sharkey, 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Alien Dominance of the Parasitoid Wasp Community Along an Elevation Gradient on Hawai’I Island
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- Published Research US Geological Survey 2008 Alien dominance of the parasitoid wasp community along an elevation gradient on Hawai’i Island Robert W. Peck U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] Paul C. Banko U.S. Geological Survey Marla Schwarzfeld U.S. Geological Survey Melody Euaparadorn U.S. Geological Survey Kevin W. Brinck U.S. Geological Survey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Peck, Robert W.; Banko, Paul C.; Schwarzfeld, Marla; Euaparadorn, Melody; and Brinck, Kevin W., "Alien dominance of the parasitoid wasp community along an elevation gradient on Hawai’i Island" (2008). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 652. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/652 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- Published Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Biol Invasions (2008) 10:1441–1455 DOI 10.1007/s10530-008-9218-1 ORIGINAL PAPER Alien dominance of the parasitoid wasp community along an elevation gradient on Hawai’i Island Robert W. Peck Æ Paul C. Banko Æ Marla Schwarzfeld Æ Melody Euaparadorn Æ Kevin W. Brinck Received: 7 December 2007 / Accepted: 21 January 2008 / Published online: 6 February 2008 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008 Abstract Through intentional and accidental increased with increasing elevation, with all three introduction, more than 100 species of alien Ichneu- elevations differing significantly from each other. monidae and Braconidae (Hymenoptera) have Nine species purposely introduced to control pest become established in the Hawaiian Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects Parasitoids: Natural Enemies of Helicoverpa
    Queensland the Smart State insects Parasitoids: Natural enemies of helicoverpa Introduction Helicoverpa caterpillars (often called heliothis) are serious pests of many crops in Australia. A range of parasitoid and predatory insects attack helicoverpa. Identifying and conserving these beneficial insects is fundamental to implementing pest management with a reduced reliance on chemical insecticides. This brochure describes the most important parasitoids of helicoverpa in Australian broadacre crops. Parasitoids versus parasites: What’s the difference? Parasitoids kill their hosts; parasites (such Figure 1. Netelia producta is one of the as lice and fleas) do not. All the insects most commonly encountered parasitoids in this brochure are parasitoids. Despite of helicoverpa. Females lay their eggs onto this difference, the terms parasitoid and caterpillars, and the hatching wasp larva parasite are often used interchangeably, if feeds on its host, eventually killing it. inaccurately. Parasitoids such as Netelia can be important biological control agents of helicoverpa in crops. (Photo: K. Power) All comments about parasitoid abundance in this publication are based on field observations in southern Queensland farming systems. These patterns may not occur in all parts of Australia. About parasitoids What is a parasitoid? How do parasitoids find their A parasitoid is an insect that kills (parasitises) hosts? its host — usually another insect — in Many adult parasitoids find their host by order to complete its lifecycle. In Australia, smell. They can detect the direct odour of helicoverpa are parasitised by many species the host itself, or odours associated with host of wasps and flies. All helicoverpa immature activity, such as plant damage or caterpillar stages are parasitised (that is, egg, caterpillar frass (dung).
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera (Stinging Wasps)
    Return to insect order home Page 1 of 3 Visit us on the Web: www.gardeninghelp.org Insect Order ID: Hymenoptera (Stinging Wasps) Life Cycle–Complete metamorphosis: Queens or solitary adults lay eggs. Larvae eat, grow and molt. This stage is repeated a varying number of times, depending on species, until hormonal changes cause the larvae to pupate. Inside a cell (in nests) or a pupal case (solitary), they change in form and color and develop wings. The adults look completely different from the larvae. Solitary wasps: Social wasps: Adults–Stinging wasps have hard bodies and most have membranous wings (some are wingless). The forewing is larger than the hindwing and the two are hooked together as are all Hymenoptera, hence the name "married wings," but this is difficult to see. Some species fold their wings lengthwise, making their wings look long and narrow. The head is oblong and clearly separated from the thorax, and the eyes are compound eyes, but not multifaceted. All have a cinched-in waist (wasp waist). Eggs are laid from the base of the ovipositor, while the ovipositor itself, in most species, has evolved into a stinger. Thus only females have stingers. (Click images to enlarge or orange text for more information.) Oblong head Compound eyes Folded wings but not multifaceted appear Cinched in waist long & narrow Return to insect order home Page 2 of 3 Eggs–Colonies of social wasps have at least one queen that lays both fertilized and unfertilized eggs. Most are fertilized and all fertilized eggs are female. Most of these become workers; a few become queens.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin Bee Identification Guide
    WisconsinWisconsin BeeBee IdentificationIdentification GuideGuide Developed by Patrick Liesch, Christy Stewart, and Christine Wen Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) The honey bee is perhaps our best-known pollinator. Honey bees are not native to North America and were brought over with early settlers. Honey bees are mid-sized bees (~ ½ inch long) and have brownish bodies with bands of pale hairs on the abdomen. Honey bees are unique with their social behavior, living together year-round as a colony consisting of thousands of individuals. Honey bees forage on a wide variety of plants and their colonies can be useful in agricultural settings for their pollination services. Honey bees are our only bee that produces honey, which they use as a food source for the colony during the winter months. In many cases, the honey bees you encounter may be from a local beekeeper’s hive. Occasionally, wild honey bee colonies can become established in cavities in hollow trees and similar settings. Photo by Christy Stewart Bumble bees (Bombus sp.) Bumble bees are some of our most recognizable bees. They are amongst our largest bees and can be close to 1 inch long, although many species are between ½ inch and ¾ inch long. There are ~20 species of bumble bees in Wisconsin and most have a robust, fuzzy appearance. Bumble bees tend to be very hairy and have black bodies with patches of yellow or orange depending on the species. Bumble bees are a type of social bee Bombus rufocinctus and live in small colonies consisting of dozens to a few hundred workers. Photo by Christy Stewart Their nests tend to be constructed in preexisting underground cavities, such as former chipmunk or rabbit burrows.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control of Insect Pests in Wheat
    E-310 BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INSECT PESTS IN WHEAT Allen Knutson, Extension entomologist; Emory P. Boring, III Extension entomologist; G. J. Michels Jr. Associate professor of Entomology, Texas AgriLife Extension Service; and Frank Gilstrap Professor, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University. All insects have natural enemies which, in addition to weather and food supply, limit their populations. This process, unaided and often unrecognized by man, is termed natural control. It is important to recognize the impact of natural control factors and, where possible, encourage their action. Biological control is the use of natural enemies to control insect pests. The ancient Chinese distributed nests of predatory ants among citrus trees to control caterpillars and borers. Today, biological control is an increasingly important component of integrated pest management (IPM) programs for agriculture as well as for urban environments. Biological control does not present the human health and environmental concerns associated with chemical pesticide use. Nor is there much chance pests will develop resistance to natural enemies, as commonly occurs with insecticides. However, there should be different expectations for biological control than for chemical control. Natural enemies are living organisms with specific environmental requirements and behaviors. While insecticides often produce rapid, uniform control of insect pests, weeks, months or even years may be required before natural enemies effectively control pests. As biological control takes effect and pests become scarce, their natural enemies may leave the area. Adverse weather conditions or changes in crop production practices also can reduce populations of natural enemies. In both cases, pest outbreaks may recur. Using biological control effectively requires a good understanding of the biology of the pest and its natural enemies, as well as the ability to identify their life stages in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Key to the Subfamilies of Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera)
    Identification key to the subfamilies of Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) Gavin Broad Dept. of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK Notes on the key, February 2011 This key to ichneumonid subfamilies should be regarded as a test version and feedback will be much appreciated (emails to [email protected]). Many of the illustrations are provisional and more characters need to be illustrated, which is a work in progress. Many of the scanning electron micrographs were taken by Sondra Ward for Ian Gauld’s series of volumes on the Ichneumonidae of Costa Rica. Many of the line drawings are by Mike Fitton. I am grateful to Pelle Magnusson for the photographs of Brachycyrtus ornatus and for his suggestion as to where to include this subfamily in the key. Other illustrations are my own work. Morphological terminology mostly follows Fitton et al. (1988). A comprehensively illustrated list of morphological terms employed here is in development. In lateral views, the anterior (head) end of the wasp is to the left and in dorsal or ventral images, the anterior (head) end is uppermost. There are a few exceptions (indicated in figure legends) and these will rectified soon. Identifying ichneumonids Identifying ichneumonids can be a daunting process, with about 2,400 species in Britain and Ireland. These are currently classified into 32 subfamilies (there are a few more extralimitally). Rather few of these subfamilies are reconisable on the basis of simple morphological character states, rather, they tend to be reconisable on combinations of characters that occur convergently and in different permutations across various groups of ichneumonids.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 3 Life Cycles of Insects
    Praying Mantis 3A-1 Hi, boys and girls. It’s time to meet one of the most fascinating insects on the planet. That’s me. I’m a praying mantis, named for the way I hold my two front legs together as though I am praying. I might look like I am praying, but my incredibly fast front legs are designed to grab my food in the blink of an eye! Praying Mantis 3A-1 I’m here to talk to you about the life stages of insects—how insects develop from birth to adult. Many insects undergo a complete change in shape and appearance. I’m sure that you are already familiar with how a caterpillar changes into a butterfly. The name of the process in which a caterpillar changes, or morphs, into a butterfly is called metamorphosis. Life Cycle of a Butterfly 3A-2 Insects like the butterfly pass through four stages in their life cycles: egg, larva [LAR-vah], pupa, and adult. Each stage looks completely different from the next. The young never resemble, or look like, their parents and almost always eat something entirely different. Life Cycle of a Butterfly 3A-2 The female insect lays her eggs on a host plant. When the eggs hatch, the larvae [LAR-vee] that emerge look like worms. Different names are given to different insects in this worm- like stage, and for the butterfly, the larva state is called a caterpillar. Insect larvae: maggot, grub and caterpillar3A-3 Fly larvae are called maggots; beetle larvae are called grubs; and the larvae of butterflies and moths, as you just heard, are called caterpillars.
    [Show full text]
  • Wax, Wings, and Swarms: Insects and Their Products As Art Media
    Wax, Wings, and Swarms: Insects and their Products as Art Media Barrett Anthony Klein Pupating Lab Biology Department, University of Wisconsin—La Crosse, La Crosse, WI 54601 email: [email protected] When citing this paper, please use the following: Klein BA. Submitted. Wax, Wings, and Swarms: Insects and their Products as Art Media. Annu. Rev. Entom. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-020821-060803 Keywords art, cochineal, cultural entomology, ethnoentomology, insect media art, silk 1 Abstract Every facet of human culture is in some way affected by our abundant, diverse insect neighbors. Our relationship with insects has been on display throughout the history of art, sometimes explicitly, but frequently in inconspicuous ways. This is because artists can depict insects overtly, but they can also allude to insects conceptually, or use insect products in a purely utilitarian manner. Insects themselves can serve as art media, and artists have explored or exploited insects for their products (silk, wax, honey, propolis, carmine, shellac, nest paper), body parts (e.g., wings), and whole bodies (dead, alive, individually, or as collectives). This review surveys insects and their products used as media in the visual arts, and considers the untapped potential for artistic exploration of media derived from insects. The history, value, and ethics of “insect media art” are topics relevant at a time when the natural world is at unprecedented risk. INTRODUCTION The value of studying cultural entomology and insect art No review of human culture would be complete without art, and no review of art would be complete without the inclusion of insects. Cultural entomology, a field of study formalized in 1980 (43), and ambitiously reviewed 35 years ago by Charles Hogue (44), clearly illustrates that artists have an inordinate fondness for insects.
    [Show full text]
  • Statecraft and Insect Oeconomies in the Global French Enlightenment (1670-1815)
    Statecraft and Insect Oeconomies in the Global French Enlightenment (1670-1815) Pierre-Etienne Stockland Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2018 © 2017 Etienne Stockland All rights reserved ABSTRACT Statecraft and Insect Oeconomies in the Global French Enlightenment (1670-1815) Pierre-Etienne Stockland Naturalists, state administrators and farmers in France and its colonies developed a myriad set of techniques over the course of the long eighteenth century to manage the circulation of useful and harmful insects. The development of normative protocols for classifying, depicting and observing insects provided a set of common tools and techniques for identifying and tracking useful and harmful insects across great distances. Administrative techniques for containing the movement of harmful insects such as quarantine, grain processing and fumigation developed at the intersection of science and statecraft, through the collaborative efforts of diplomats, state administrators, naturalists and chemical practitioners. The introduction of insectivorous animals into French colonies besieged by harmful insects was envisioned as strategy for restoring providential balance within environments suffering from human-induced disequilibria. Naturalists, administrators, and agricultural improvers also collaborated in projects to maximize the production of useful substances secreted by insects, namely silk, dyes and medicines. A study of
    [Show full text]
  • Grasshopper Life Cycle Overwinter As Nymphs
    Twostriped grasshopper Redlegged grasshopper Clearwinged grasshopper Striped grasshopper Differential grasshopper Takes bran bait well. Pest of crops, trees, shrubs, and range. Peak hatch Takes bran bait well. Pest of crops and forage. Peak hatch range: Takes bran bait well. Pest of crops and forage. Peak hatch range: Does not take bran bait. Pest of range grasses. Peak hatch range: Takes bran bait well. Pest of crops, trees, and shrubs. Peak hatch range: range: May 15 – June 15. Female body length: June 21 – July 1. Female body length: May 15 – June 15. Female body length: May 15 – June 15. Female body length: June 21 – July 1. Female body length: 1. Hatching usually occurs mid-May to late June. A few species hatch in the summer and Grasshopper Life Cycle overwinter as nymphs. Western grasshoppers produce only one generation per year 2. Grasshoppers have to shed their hard exoskeleton to grow bigger through each nymphal phase (instar) to adulthood. They often hang upside down on grass stems to molt. It takes five to seven days to complete First and second instar nymphs (or an instar. hoppers) are usually less than 3/8” Migratory grasshopper long and no wing pads are visible. 3. Most species have five nymphal instars. Spottedwinged grasshopper Takes bran bait well. Pest of crops, range, and trees. Peak hatch range: Does not take bran bait. Pest of range grasses. Peak hatch range: May 15 – June 15. Female body length: 4. The last molt results in an adult with functional May 15 – June 15. Female body length: Third and fourth instars are usually wings that allow low, evasive flights.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)
    WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties.
    [Show full text]