CASE NO: A-19-796755-B Department 11

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CASE NO: A-19-796755-B Department 11 Electronically Filed 6/17/2019 7:57 AM Steven D. Grierson CLERK OF THE COURT 1 COMPB 2 AARON D. FORD, ESQ. ROBERT T. EGLET, ESQ. Attorney General Nevada Bar No. 3402 3 ERNEST FIGUEROA, ESQ. ROBERT M. ADAMS, ESQ. Consumer Advocate Nevada Bar No.CASE 6551 NO: A-19-796755-B 4 MARK J. KRUEGER, ESQ. ARTEMUS W. HAM, ESQ. Department 11 Nevada Bar No. 7410 Nevada Bar No. 7001 5 Chief Deputy Attorney General ERICA D. ENSTMINGER, ESQ. State of Nevada, Office of the Attorney Nevada Bar No. 7432 6 General, Bureau of Consumer Protection CASSANDRA S.M. CUMMINGS, ESQ. 100 North Carson Street Nevada Bar No. 11944 7 Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717 RICHARD K. HY, ESQ. (702) 684-1100; Fax (702) 684-1108 Nevada Bar No. 12406 8 [email protected] EGLET ADAMS 400 S. Seventh St., Suite 400 9 MIKE PAPANTONIO, ESQ. Las Vegas, NV 89101 TROY RAFFERTY, ESQ. (702) 450-5400; Fax: (702) 450-5451 10 PETER MOUGEY, ESQ. [email protected] LAURA DUNNING, ESQ. 11 NED MCWILLIAMS, ESQ. KEITH GIVENS, ESQ. 12 BRANDON BOGLE, ESQ. JOSEPH LANE, ESQ. JEFF GADDY, ESQ. ANGELA MASON, ESQ. 13 (Pro Hac Vice Pending) JOHN GIVENS, ESQ. LEVIN PAPANTONIO LAW FIRM JESSICA GIVENS, ESQ. 14 316 S. Bavlen Street, Suite 400 CHASE GIVENS, ESQ. Pensacola, Florida 32502 (Pro Hac Vice Pending) 15 (850) 435-7064; Fax: (850) 436-6064 THE COCHRAN FIRM-DOTHAN, PC [email protected] 111 East Main Street 16 Dothan, Alabama 36301 ROLAND TELLIS, ESQ. (334) 673-1555; Fax: (334) 699-7229 17 (Pro Hac Vice Pending) [email protected] BARON & BUDD 18 3102 Oak Lawn Avenue, #1100 Dallas, Texas 75219 19 P. (214) 521-3605 F. (214) 520-1181 20 [email protected] 21 Attorneys for Plaintiff 22 State of Nevada 23 DISTRICT COURT 24 CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA 25 26 27 28 Case Number: A-19-796755-B 1 STATE OF NEVADA, Case No.: 2 Dept. No.: 3 Plaintiff, 4 vs. 5 COMPLAINT MCKESSON CORPORATION; CARDINAL 6 HEALTH INC.; CARDINAL HEALTH 105, INC.; REQUEST FOR BUSINESS 7 CARDINAL HEALTH 108, LLC; CARDINAL COURT HEALTH 110, LLC; CARDINAL HEALTH 200, 8 LLC; CARDINAL HEALTH 414, LLC; EXEMPT FROM CARDINAL HEALTH PHARMACY SERVICES, 9 ARBITRATION LLC; AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG 10 CORPORATION; WALGREENS BOOTS ALLIANCE, INC.; WALGREEN CO.; 11 WALGREEN EASTERN CO., INC.; WALMART 12 INC.; CVS HEALTH CORPORATION; CVS PHARAMCEY, INC.; TEVA 13 PHARMACEUTICALS USA,;TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD.; 14 ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC.; PURDUE PHARMA 15 L.P.; PURDUE PHARMA, INC.; PURDUE HOLDINGS, L.P.; THE PURDUE FREDERICK 16 COMPANY, INC.; INC.; P.F. LABORATORIES, INC.; RICHARD S. SACKLER; JONATHAN D. 17 SACKLER, MORTIMER D.A. SACKLER; 18 KATHE A. SACKLER; ILENE SACKLER LEFCOURT; DAVID A. SACKLER; BEVERLY 19 SACKLER; THERESA SACKLER; PLP ASSOCIATES HOLDINGS L.P.; ROSEBAY 20 MEDICAL COMPANY L.P.; BEACON 21 COMPANY; DOE ENTITIES 1-10; MALLINCKRODT PLC; MALLINCKRODT LLC; 22 SPECGX LLC; INSYS THERAPEUTICS, INC.JOHN KAPOOR; RICHARD M. SIMON; 23 SUNRISE LEE; JOSEPH A. ROWAN; MICHAEL 24 J. GURRY; MICHAEL BABICH; ALEC BURLAKOFF; 25 26 Defendants. 27 28 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 2 3 II. PARTIES ........................................................................................................................... 7 4 A. Plaintiff ................................................................................................................. 7 5 B. Defendants ............................................................................................................ 7 6 1. Manufacturer Defendants ....................................................................... 8 7 8 a. Teva Entities .................................................................................. 8 9 b. Purdue Entities and the Sackler Defendants .................................. 9 10 c. SpecGX and Mallinckrodt Entities .............................................. 13 11 d. Insys Therapeutics and Insys Executives ..................................... 15 12 2. Distributor Defendants .......................................................................... 17 13 14 a. McKesson Corporation ................................................................ 18 15 b. Cardinal Health Entities ............................................................... 18 16 c. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation ........................................ 19 17 d. Walgreens Entities ....................................................................... 20 18 19 e. Walmart Entities .......................................................................... 20 20 f. CVS Entities ................................................................................ 21 21 C. Agency and Authority ....................................................................................... 21 22 III. JURISDICTION & VENUE ............................................................................................ 21 23 IV. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS COMMON TO ALL CLAIMS........................................ 23 24 25 A. Opioids and Their Effects ................................................................................. 23 26 B. The Resurgence of Opioid Use in the United States ....................................... 26 27 1. The Sackler Family Integrated Advertising and Medicine. ............... 26 28 iii 1 2. Purdue Developed and Aggressively Promoted OxyContin. ............. 28 2 3. Other Manufacturer Defendants Leapt at the Opioid Opportunity. 32 3 C. Defendants’ Conduct Created an Abatable Public Nuisance. ....................... 34 4 D. The Manufacturer Defendants’ Multi-Pronged Scheme to Change 5 Prescriber Habits and Public Perception to Increase Demand for Opioids ............. 35 6 7 1. The Manufacturer Defendants Promoted Multiple Falsehoods About 8 Opioids. ............................................................................................................... 36 9 a. Falsehood #1: The false or misleading claims that the risk of 10 addiction from chronic opioid therapy is low. ......................................... 37 11 i. Purdue’s misrepresentations regarding addiction risk ......... 38 12 ii. As the Owners of Purdue, members of Purdue’s Board and 13 Former Officers of the Company, the Sacklers had actual 14 knowledge of, sanctioned, and participated in Purdue’s deceptive, 15 misleading, and otherwise illegal practices ................................ 43 16 17 iii. Actavis’s misrepresentations regarding addiction risk ....... 57 18 iv. Mallinckrodt’s misrepresentations regarding addiction risk 19 58 20 b. Falsehood #2: The false or misleading claims that to the extent 21 there is a risk of addiction, it can be easily identified and managed. ...... 60 22 c. Falsehood #3: The false or misleading claims that signs of 23 addictive behavior are “pseudoaddiction,” requiring more opioids. ....... 62 24 d. Falsehood #4: The false or misleading claims that opioid 25 withdrawal can be avoided by tapering. .................................................. 63 26 27 e. Falsehood #5: The false or misleading claims that opioid doses 28 can be increased without limit or greater risks. ....................................... 64 iv 1 f. Falsehood #6: The false or misleading claims that long-term 2 opioid use improves functioning.............................................................. 66 3 g. Falsehood #7: The false or misleading claims that alternative forms 4 of pain relief pose greater risks than opioids. .......................................... 70 5 h. Falsehood #8: The false or misleading claims that OxyContin 6 provides twelve hours of pain relief. ....................................................... 71 7 i. Falsehood #9: The false or misleading claims that new 8 formulations of certain opioids successfully deter abuse. ....................... 75 9 10 i. Purdue’s deceptive marketing of reformulated OxyContin and 11 Hysingla ER ................................................................................. 75 12 ii. Other Manufacturer Defendants’ misrepresentations 13 regarding abuse deterrence ......................................................... 79 14 2. The Manufacturer Defendants Disseminated Their Misleading 15 Messages About Opioids Through Multiple Channels ................................... 80 16 a. The Manufacturer Defendants Directed Front Groups to 17 Deceptively Promote Opioid Use. ........................................................... 81 18 19 i. American Pain Foundation .................................................... 82 20 ii. American Academy of Pain Medicine and the American Pain 21 Society .......................................................................................... 85 22 iii. The Federation of State Medical Boards ............................. 87 23 iv. The Alliance for Patient Access ........................................... 89 24 v. The U.S. Pain Foundation ..................................................... 92 25 26 vi. American Geriatrics Society ................................................ 93 27 28 v 1 b. The Manufacturer Defendants Paid Key Opinion Leaders to 2 Deceptively Promote Opioid Use. ........................................................... 94 3 i. Dr. Russell Portenoy .............................................................. 96 4 ii. Dr. Lynn Webster .................................................................. 98 5 iii. Dr. Perry Fine.................................................................... 100 6 7 iv. Dr. Scott Fishman ..............................................................
Recommended publications
  • Jazz and the Cultural Transformation of America in the 1920S
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2003 Jazz and the cultural transformation of America in the 1920s Courtney Patterson Carney Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Carney, Courtney Patterson, "Jazz and the cultural transformation of America in the 1920s" (2003). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 176. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/176 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. JAZZ AND THE CULTURAL TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICA IN THE 1920S A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Courtney Patterson Carney B.A., Baylor University, 1996 M.A., Louisiana State University, 1998 December 2003 For Big ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The real truth about it is no one gets it right The real truth about it is we’re all supposed to try1 Over the course of the last few years I have been in contact with a long list of people, many of whom have had some impact on this dissertation. At the University of Chicago, Deborah Gillaspie and Ray Gadke helped immensely by guiding me through the Chicago Jazz Archive.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Kentucky
    CAUSE NO. DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT § D/B/A PARKLAND HEALTH & § IN THE DISTRICT COURT HOSPITAL SYSTEM; PALO PINTO § COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT A/K/A § PALO PINTO GENERAL HOSPITAL; § GUADALUPE VALLEY HOSPITAL A/K/A § GUADALUPE REGIONAL MEDICAL § CENTER; VHS SAN ANTONIO § PARTNERS, LLC D/B/A BAPTIST § OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS MEDICAL CENTER, MISSION TRAIL § BAPTIST HOSPITAL, NORTH CENTRAL § BAPTIST HOSPITAL, NORTHEAST § BAPTIST HOSPITAL, and ST. LUKE’S § BAPTIST HOSPITAL; NACOGDOCHES § MEDICAL CENTER; RESOLUTE § HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC D/B/A § _____ JUDICIAL DISTRICT RESOLUTE HEALTH; THE HOSPITALS § OF PROVIDENCE EAST CAMPUS; THE § HOSPITALS OF PROVIDENCE § MEMORIAL CAMPUS; THE HOSPITALS § OF PROVIDENCE SIERRA CAMPUS; THE § HOSPITALS OF PROVIDENCE § TRANSMOUNTAIN CAMPUS; VHS § BROWNSVILLE HOSPITAL COMPANY, § LLC D/B/A VALLEY BAPTIST MEDICAL § CENTER - BROWNSVILLE; VHS § HARLINGEN HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC § D/B/A VALLEY BAPTIST MEDICAL § CENTER; ARMC, L.P. D/B/A ABILENE § REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER; § COLLEGE STATION HOSPITAL, LP; § GRANBURY HOSPITAL CORPORATION § D/B/A LAKE GRANBURY MEDICAL § CENTER; NAVARRO HOSPITAL, L.P. § D/B/A NAVARRO REGIONAL HOSPITAL; § BROWNWOOD HOSPITAL, L.P. D/B/A § BROWNWOOD REGIONAL MEDICAL § CENTER; VICTORIA OF TEXAS, L.P. § D/B/A DETAR HOSPITAL NAVARRO and § DETAR HOSPITAL NORTH; LAREDO § TEXAS HOSPITAL COMPANY, L.P. D/B/A § LAREDO MEDICAL CENTER; SAN § ANGELO HOSPITAL, L.P. D/B/A SAN § ANGELO COMMUNITY MEDICAL § CENTER; CEDAR PARK HEALTH § SYSTEM, L.P. D/B/A CEDAR PARK § REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER; NHCI § OF HILLSBORO, INC. D/B/A HILL § REGIONAL HOSPITAL; LONGVIEW § MEDICAL CENTER, L.P. D/B/A § LONGVIEW REGIONAL MEDICAL § CENTER; and PINEY WOODS § HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Sackler Complaint
    49D13-1905-PL-020498 Filed: 5/21/2019 9:44 AM Clerk Marion Superior Court, Civil Division 13 Marion County, Indiana IN THE CIRCUIT / SUPERIOR COURT FOR MARION COUNTY, INDIANA STATE OF INDIANA, Plaintiff, vs. RICHARD SACKLER, THERESA SACKLER, KATHE SACKLER, JONATHAN SACKLER, MORTIMER D.A. SACKLER, BEVERLY SACKLER, DAVID SACKLER, and ILENE SACKLER LEFCOURT, Defendants. COMPLAINT TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT .................................................................................................... 1 PARTIES ...................................................................................................................................... 11 JURISDICTION AND VENUE ................................................................................................... 14 GENERAL ALLEGATIONS COMMON TO ALL COUNTS.................................................... 15 I. The Sackler Defendants, Through Purdue, Changed the Medical Consensus by Working Every Channel to Reach Prescribers and Indiana Patients. ................................................................................................................. 15 A. Purdue regularly met face-to-face with prescribers to promote its opioid drugs. ............................................................................................. 16 B. Purdue co-opted and exploited seemingly-independent channels to reach prescribers. ...................................................................................... 19 II. From Their Position of Control, the Sackler Defendants
    [Show full text]
  • Genome-Wide Association for Major Depression Through Age at Onset Stratification Major Depressive Disorder Working Group Of
    King’s Research Portal DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.05.010 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Power, R., Tansey, K., Buttenschøn, H. N., Cohen-Woods, S., Bigdeli, T., Psychiatric Genomics Consortium MDD Working Group, Hall, L. S., Kutalik, Z., Hong Lee, S., Ripke, S., Steinberg, S., Teumer, A., Viktorin, A., Wray, N. R., Baune, B. T., Boomsma, D. I., Børglum, A. D., Byrne, E. M., Castelao, E., ... GERAD1 Consortium: (2017). Genome-wide Association for Major Depression Through Age at Onset Stratification. Biological psychiatry , 81(4), 325-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.05.010 Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research.
    [Show full text]
  • AG Balderas Files Lawsuit Against Purdue Pharma's Sackler Family for Fueling Opioid Crisis
    For Immediate Release: September 10, 2019 Contact: Matt Baca (505) 270-748 AG Balderas Files Lawsuit Against Purdue Pharma's Sackler Family for Fueling Opioid Crisis Albuquerque, NM---Today, Attorney General Balderas took yet another step in holding accountable those responsible for New Mexico's opioid epidemic. In a lawsuit filed today, Attorney General Balderas brought action against the Sackler family for masterminding illegal and deceptive practices which caused millions of pills to come flooding into New Mexico. These eight members of the billionaire Sackler Family have owned and controlled Purdue for decades. Until recently, the Sacklers controlled a majority of the seats on the company's board and used the company to execute illegal and deadly schemes which helped lead New Mexico and the rest of the nation into the epidemic we are currently facing, all the while paying themselves billions. "The Sacklers are perhaps the most deadly drug dealers in the world. Because of their illegal actions, New Mexico faces some of the highest opioid related death numbers in the nation, and we have whole communities here in New Mexico which will never be the same again,” said Attorney General Balderas. "Today I am seeking to hold them accountable and to help end New Mexico's crisis and avoid more lives being lost." The Sacklers and Purdue designed their operations to pull the wool over the eyes of the public, state and federal regulators, and many doctors. They wrote the book on how to market narcotics directly to doctors and to the public-- convincing everyone through a decades-long misinformation campaign that pain was being under-treated, and that chronic, long-lasting pain of all sorts should be aggressively treated with their powerful opioid, oxycontin.
    [Show full text]
  • In Re Purdue Pharma LP, Et Al
    In re Purdue Pharma LP, et al. Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC Counsel to Raymond Sackler Family (“Side B”) Defense Presentation Part 2: Marketing April 26, 2021 1 Marketing 2 Board Members Did Not Personally Participate in Marketing • Board did not approve the content of any marketing material • Board relied on approval of all marketing material by (1) Medical, (2) Legal, and (3) Regulatory Affairs • Board relied on outside counsel’s audits and positive endorsement of Purdue’s Compliance Program • Board relied on OIG’s and IRO’s confirmations of compliance (2007-12) “In performing his duties, • Board relied on management’s confirmations marketing a director shall be entitled to rely on complied with state and federal laws (2007-18) information, opinions, reports or statements … prepared or presented by • Board relied on monitoring of sales calls by District Managers, … officers or employees of the corporation … whom Legal and Compliance the director believes to be reliable and competent in the matters presented ….” • Board Relied on compliance audits of key risk activities N.Y. Bus. Corp. Law §717 3 Board Knew Purdue Submitted All Marketing Materials to FDA § 314.81 Other postmarketing reports. (3) Other reporting—(i) Advertisements and promotional labeling. The applicant shall submit specimens of mailing pieces and any other labeling or advertising devised for promotion of the drug product at the time of initial dissemination of the labeling and at the time of initial publication of the advertisement for a prescription drug product… https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pk g/CFR-1997-title21-vol5/xml/CFR- 1997-title21-vol5-sec314-81.xml 4 Board Knew FDA Issues Warning Letters for Non-Compliant Marketing Material a.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to Dreamland Villa Social!
    Offi cial Paper For Dreamland Villa Retirement Community Vol. 12 No. 4 April 2017 16 Pages DVRC Briefs Welcome to Karaoke (NEW) Dreamland Villa Social! Sunday, April 2, 9, 23, 30 by Cyn Munday dreamlandvilla.org for a complete reaches out to help you feel welcome. Welcome to your new Dreamland listing of activities and a little history Now with the weather warming up a 5 p.m. – 8 p.m. Read Hall Community. A sincere welcome to of Dreamland Villa. There are a variety few of the streets are holding Block all of our new residents! It’s nice to of activities especially scheduled for Watch parties and we hope you have an have a friendly greeting and to meet the winter season where we hope you opportunity to participate since this is some of your neighbors here in your will join in and participate. Please very important to keeping our homes safe DVRC Board Study Session community. Please come and join us take a moment to look over the website and clean. for an Informational Social meeting calendar. There are many links to aid We look forward to meeting you soon Tuesday, April 4 for all new residents on April 12 at 7 in your search. and our volunteers will greet you warmly p.m at Read Hall in the Offi ce Complex Retirement should include having with our friendliest smiles. Please do at 320 N 55th Pl. Our mission is to be fun, getting to know more friendly folks not hesitate to call the offi ce at 480-832- 9 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Enforcement
    Page 2 Friday, October 4, 2019 Friday, October 4, 2019 Page 23 Daily Court Review Daily Court Review LAW ENFORCEMENT LAW ENFORCEMENTA weekly section, keeping you informed DAILY COURT REVIEW LAW ENFORCEMENT available at: Harris County Constable Pct. 1 Constable Alan Rosen 1302 Preston, Suite 301, Houston, TX 77002 713-755-5200 Harris County Constable Pct. 2 COLLEGES GOT MILLIONS FROM Constable Christopher E. Diaz 101 S Richey St, Suite C, Pasadena, TX 77506 OPIOID MAKER OWNERS 713-477-2766 Harris County Constable Pct. 3 By Collin Binkley And Jennifer Mcdermott | Associated Press Constable Sherman Eagleton 14350 Wallisville Rd., Houston, TX 77049 Prestigious universities around the world have accepted at sion for England and Wales. The recipients included schools from some students, alumni and politicians. Behind Rockefeller was the University of The AP contacted all universities that were lion from the Sackler Foundation in 2015, 701 Baker Road, Baytown, TX 77521 least $60 million over the past five years from the family that in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and Israel. Petitions at New York University and Tel Aviv University Sussex in England, which received $9.8 mil- identified in tax records as receiving more tax records show, along with smaller gifts as 281-427-4792 owns the maker of OxyContin, even as the company became For decades, the family has been a major philanthropic called on the schools to strip the Sackler name from research lion, according to tax records. A university than $1 million, along with some that were recently as 2017, totaling nearly $500,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Doctor Who 1 Doctor Who
    Doctor Who 1 Doctor Who This article is about the television series. For other uses, see Doctor Who (disambiguation). Doctor Who Genre Science fiction drama Created by • Sydney Newman • C. E. Webber • Donald Wilson Written by Various Directed by Various Starring Various Doctors (as of 2014, Peter Capaldi) Various companions (as of 2014, Jenna Coleman) Theme music composer • Ron Grainer • Delia Derbyshire Opening theme Doctor Who theme music Composer(s) Various composers (as of 2005, Murray Gold) Country of origin United Kingdom No. of seasons 26 (1963–89) plus one TV film (1996) No. of series 7 (2005–present) No. of episodes 800 (97 missing) (List of episodes) Production Executive producer(s) Various (as of 2014, Steven Moffat and Brian Minchin) Camera setup Single/multiple-camera hybrid Running time Regular episodes: • 25 minutes (1963–84, 1986–89) • 45 minutes (1985, 2005–present) Specials: Various: 50–75 minutes Broadcast Original channel BBC One (1963–1989, 1996, 2005–present) BBC One HD (2010–present) BBC HD (2007–10) Picture format • 405-line Black-and-white (1963–67) • 625-line Black-and-white (1968–69) • 625-line PAL (1970–89) • 525-line NTSC (1996) • 576i 16:9 DTV (2005–08) • 1080i HDTV (2009–present) Doctor Who 2 Audio format Monaural (1963–87) Stereo (1988–89; 1996; 2005–08) 5.1 Surround Sound (2009–present) Original run Classic series: 23 November 1963 – 6 December 1989 Television film: 12 May 1996 Revived series: 26 March 2005 – present Chronology Related shows • K-9 and Company (1981) • Torchwood (2006–11) • The Sarah Jane Adventures (2007–11) • K-9 (2009–10) • Doctor Who Confidential (2005–11) • Totally Doctor Who (2006–07) External links [1] Doctor Who at the BBC Doctor Who is a British science-fiction television programme produced by the BBC.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoffrey Beevers Is the Master*
    ISSUE 40 • JUNE 2012 NOT FOR RESALE FREE! GEOFFREY BEEVERS IS THE MASTER* PLUS! MARK STRICKSON & SARAH SUTTON Nyssa and Turlough Interviewed! I KNOW THAT VOICE... Famous names in Big Finish! *AND YOU WILL OBEY HIM! SNEAK PREVIEWS EDITORIAL AND WHISPERS e love stories. You’ll be hearing those words from us a lot more over the coming months. We’re only saying it because it’s the truth. And in THE FOURTH DOCTOR ADVENTURES a way, you’ve been hearing it from us since we started all this, right SERIES 3 W back in 1998, with Bernice Summerfield! Every now and then, I think it’s a good idea to stop and consider why we do 2014 might seem what we do; especially when, as has happened recently, we’ve been getting such a long way away, a pounding by a vociferous minority in online forums. As you may know, there but it’ll be here have been some teething problems with the changeover to our new website. before you know There was a problem with the data from the old site, relating to the downloads it – and so we’re in customers’ accounts. It seems that the information was not complete and had already in the some anomalous links in it, which meant that some downloads didn’t appear and studio recording others were allocated incorrectly. Yes, we accidentally gave a lot of stuff away! And, the third series of in these cash-strapped times, that was particularly painful for us. Thanks to all of Fourth Doctor Adventures, once again you who contacted us to say you wouldn’t take advantage of these – shall we say featuring the Doctor and Leela.
    [Show full text]
  • Impossible Worlds, Impossible Things
    Impossible Worlds, Impossible Things Impossible Worlds, Impossible Things: Cultural Perspectives on Doctor Who, Torchwood and The Sarah Jane Adventures Edited by Ross P. Garner, Melissa Beattie and Una McCormack Impossible Worlds, Impossible Things: Cultural Perspectives on Doctor Who, Torchwood and The Sarah Jane Adventures, edited by Ross P. Garner, Melissa Beattie and Una McCormack This book first published 2010 Cambridge Scholars Publishing 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2010 by Ross P. Garner, Melissa Beattie and Una McCormack and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-1960-3, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-1960-2 This work is lovingly dedicated to Alexandra Smith, who passed away suddenly in April 2009, and without whom none of this would be possible. Ars Longa Vita Brevis Amicitia Aeterna. TABLE OF CONTENTS Editors’ Acknowledgements....................................................................... ix Foreword .................................................................................................... xi Andrew Pixley Introduction Fifty Not Out: The Doctor’s Enduring Appeal........................................ xvii Ross
    [Show full text]
  • DECLARATION of Jane Sunderland in Support of Request For
    Columbia Pictures Industries Inc v. Bunnell Doc. 373 Att. 1 Exhibit 1 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation Motion Pictures 28 DAYS LATER 28 WEEKS LATER ALIEN 3 Alien vs. Predator ANASTASIA Anna And The King (1999) AQUAMARINE Banger Sisters, The Battle For The Planet Of The Apes Beach, The Beauty and the Geek BECAUSE OF WINN-DIXIE BEDAZZLED BEE SEASON BEHIND ENEMY LINES Bend It Like Beckham Beneath The Planet Of The Apes BIG MOMMA'S HOUSE BIG MOMMA'S HOUSE 2 BLACK KNIGHT Black Knight, The Brokedown Palace BROKEN ARROW Broken Arrow (1996) BROKEN LIZARD'S CLUB DREAD BROWN SUGAR BULWORTH CAST AWAY CATCH THAT KID CHAIN REACTION CHASING PAPI CHEAPER BY THE DOZEN CHEAPER BY THE DOZEN 2 Clearing, The CLEOPATRA COMEBACKS, THE Commando Conquest Of The Planet Of The Apes COURAGE UNDER FIRE DAREDEVIL DATE MOVIE 4 Dockets.Justia.com DAY AFTER TOMORROW, THE DECK THE HALLS Deep End, The DEVIL WEARS PRADA, THE DIE HARD DIE HARD 2 DIE HARD WITH A VENGEANCE DODGEBALL: A TRUE UNDERDOG STORY DOWN PERISCOPE DOWN WITH LOVE DRIVE ME CRAZY DRUMLINE DUDE, WHERE'S MY CAR? Edge, The EDWARD SCISSORHANDS ELEKTRA Entrapment EPIC MOVIE ERAGON Escape From The Planet Of The Apes Everyone's Hero Family Stone, The FANTASTIC FOUR FAST FOOD NATION FAT ALBERT FEVER PITCH Fight Club, The FIREHOUSE DOG First $20 Million, The FIRST DAUGHTER FLICKA Flight 93 Flight of the Phoenix, The Fly, The FROM HELL Full Monty, The Garage Days GARDEN STATE GARFIELD GARFIELD A TAIL OF TWO KITTIES GRANDMA'S BOY Great Expectations (1998) HERE ON EARTH HIDE AND SEEK HIGH CRIMES 5 HILLS HAVE
    [Show full text]