DOCSLIB.ORG

Marine Stewardship Council Iturup Pink & Chum Salmon Fisheries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marine Stewardship Council Iturup Pink & Chum Salmon Fisheries Marine Stewardship Council Iturup Pink & Chum Salmon Fisheries Expedited Assessment for the Addition of Purse Seine Gear Public Certification Report November 3, 2017 Evaluation Prepared for J.S.C. Gidrostroy Evaluation Prepared by Mr. Ray Beamesderfer, Team Leader, Principles 1 & 3 Mrs. Jennifer Humberstone, Principle 2 [BLANK] CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... 5 2 AUTHORSHIP & PEER REVIEWERS ........................................................................... 8 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE FISHERY ................................................................................ 9 3.1 Unit(s) of Certification & Scope of Certification Sought .................................................. 9 3.1.1 UoA and Unit of Certification (UoC) - FINAL...................................................................... 9 3.1.2 Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and Catch Data .................................................................. 10 3.1.3 Scope of Assessment in Relation to Enhanced Fisheries ................................................. 11 3.2 Overview of the Fishery ................................................................................................. 12 3.2.1 Area Description .............................................................................................................. 12 3.2.2 Fishing Method ............................................................................................................... 12 3.2.3 Enhancement .................................................................................................................. 17 3.3 Principle One: Stock Assessment & Status ..................................................................... 19 3.4 Principle Two: Ecosystem Considerations ...................................................................... 19 3.4.1 Retained Species ............................................................................................................. 19 3.4.2 Bycatch Species ............................................................................................................... 21 3.4.3 ETP Species ...................................................................................................................... 25 3.4.4 Habitats ........................................................................................................................... 28 3.4.5 Ecosystem ........................................................................................................................ 29 3.5 Principle Three: Management System Background ....................................................... 31 3.5.1 Fishery Governance and Management Objectives ......................................................... 31 3.5.2 Management Measures .................................................................................................. 31 3.5.3 Compliance and Enforcement ......................................................................................... 32 3.5.4 Research .......................................................................................................................... 32 3.5.5 Monitoring and Management Performance Evaluation ................................................. 33 4 EVALUATION PROCEDURE ................................................................................... 34 4.1 Harmonised Fishery Assessment ................................................................................... 34 4.2 Previous Assessments (of the Stationary Trap Fishery) ................................................. 34 4.2.1 Initial Certification Cycle (2009-2015) ............................................................................. 34 4.2.2 Re-certification (2015) .................................................................................................... 36 4.2.3 Status as of First Annual Surveillance (2016) .................................................................. 37 4.3 Assessment Methodologies ........................................................................................... 38 4.4 Evaluation Processes and Techniques ........................................................................... 38 4.4.1 Consultations ................................................................................................................... 39 4.4.2 Evaluation Techniques .................................................................................................... 41 5 TRACEABILITY .................................................................................................. 43 5.1 Eligibility Date ................................................................................................................. 43 5.2 Traceability within the Fishery ....................................................................................... 43 5.3 Eligibility to Enter Further Chains of Custody ................................................................ 44 6 EVALUATION RESULTS ....................................................................................... 45 6.1 Principle Level Scores ..................................................................................................... 45 6.2 Summary of Scores ......................................................................................................... 45 6.2.1 Conditions ....................................................................................................................... 46 Version 1-0 (August 2015) | © SCS Global Services 6.3 Determination, Formal Conclusion and Agreement ...................................................... 48 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 49 APPENDIX 1. SCORING AND SUPPORTING RATIONALE ..................................................... 55 Principle 1 .............................................................................................................................. 55 Principle 2 .............................................................................................................................. 55 Principle 3 .............................................................................................................................. 74 APPENDIX 2. CONDITIONS AND CLIENT ACTION PLAN ..................................................... 75 APPENDIX 3. PEER REVIEW REPORT ........................................................................... 86 APPENDIX 4. STAKEHOLDER SUBMISSIONS ................................................................... 93 APPENDIX 5. SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY ..................................................................... 95 APPENDIX 6. CLIENT AGREEMENT .............................................................................. 96 APPENDIX 7. EXAMPLES OF 2016 PURSE SEINE FISHING LICENSES ..................................... 97 Version 1-0 (August 2015) | © SCS Global Services 4 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) expedited assessment of the Iturup pink and chum salmon purse seine fishery, undergoing assessment for expansion of scope of the currently certified Iturup pink and chum salmon (stationary trap) fishery. The assessment was conducted and the findings were prepared by SCS Global Services (SCS), an MSC-accredited, independent, third-party conformity assessment body, in accordance with the MSC Principles and Criteria for sustainable fishing. The assessment complies with the MSC Certification (process) Requirements V2.0 (October 2014). The expedited UoA has been assessed against the same assessment tree as the currently certified UoA: a modified version of the Default Assessment Tree found in FAM V21. Table 1. Unit of Assessment under Expedited Assessment Unit of Assessment Species and Stock Pacific chum salmon (O. keta), Pacific pink salmon (O. gorbuscha) Gear Type Purse seine Fleet Client group purse seine vessels licensed to operate in the fishing area leased to the client group off of Iturup Island, Russian Far East, managed by Sakhalin-Kuril territorial office of the Russian Federation Far East Fisheries Agency. Includes consideration of enhancement activities by client group. Client Group J.S.C. Gidrostroy2 The Iturup pink and chum salmon trap net fisheries were first certified as sustainable in September 2009 in accordance with the MSC Principles and Criteria by accredited certification assessment body, SCS Global Services (SCS). The fishery was re-certified in August of 2015, using the MSC process requirements current at the start of the re-assessment (MSC Certification Requirements v1.3, Jan 2013) and a modified default assessment tree based on FAM V2.01. In the spring of 2016, the client informed SCS that it was planning to introduce purse seining as a gear type in 2016 for use in its late-season chum salmon fishery. Purse seine gear is not included in the current certificate scope, which is limited to stationary traps. Therefore, a scope expansion was required. In accordance with MSC FCRV2.0 (7.22 & Annex PE), SCS first conducted a Gap Analysis to evaluate what Assessment Components and Performance Indicators would be held in common or require differential assessment via an Expedited Assessment. SCS submitted the results of the Gap Analysis, with the formal announcement of the Expedited Assessment, on August 9, 2016. These materials are available online: https://fisheries.msc.org/en/fisheries/iturup-island-pink-chum-salmon/@@assessments.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PICES Sci. Rep. No. 2, 1995
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREWORD vii Part 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN THE OKHOTSK SEA AND KURIL REGION 3 1.1 Okhotsk Sea water mass modification 3 1.1.1Dense shelf water formation in the northwestern Okhotsk Sea 3 1.1.2Soya Current study 4 1.1.3East Sakhalin Current and anticyclonic Kuril Basin flow 4 1.1.4West Kamchatka Current 5 1.1.5Tides and sea level in the Okhotsk Sea 5 1.2 Influence of Okhotsk Sea waters on the subarctic Pacific and Oyashio 6 1.2.1Kuril Island strait transports (Bussol', Kruzenshtern and shallower straits) 6 1.2.2Kuril region currents: the East Kamchatka Current, the Oyashio and large eddies 7 1.2.3NPIW transport and formation rate in the Mixed Water Region 7 1.3 Sea ice analysis and forecasting 8 2.0 PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS 9 2.1 Hydrographic observations (bottle and CTD) 9 2.2 Direct current observations in the Okhotsk and Kuril region 11 2.3 Sea level measurements 12 2.4 Sea ice observations 12 2.5 Satellite observations 12 Part 2. REVIEW OF OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE OKHOTSK SEA AND OYASHIO REGION 15 1.0 GEOGRAPHY AND PECULIARITIES OF THE OKHOTSK SEA 16 2.0 SEA ICE IN THE OKHOTSK SEA 17 2.1 Sea ice observations in the Okhotsk Sea 17 2.2 Ease of ice formation in the Okhotsk Sea 17 2.3 Seasonal and interannual variations of sea ice extent 19 2.3.1Gross features of the seasonal variation in the Okhotsk Sea 19 2.3.2Sea ice thickness 19 2.3.3Polynyas and open water 19 2.3.4Interannual variability 20 2.4 Sea ice off the coast of Hokkaido 21
    [Show full text]
  • Simushir (January 15, 2009) and Samoa (September 30, 2009) Tsunami Recording in the Area of South Kuril Islands
    Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 12, EGU2010-13331-1, 2010 EGU General Assembly 2010 © Author(s) 2010 Simushir (January 15, 2009) and Samoa (September 30, 2009) tsunami recording in the area of South Kuril Islands Georgy Shevchenko (1), Anton Chernov (1), Peter Kovalev (1), Tatyana Ivelskaya (2), Artem Loskutov (1), and Alexander Shishkin (1) (1) Institute of Marine Geology and Geophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences. Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia, (2) Sakhalin Tsunami Warning Center, Federal Service of Russia for Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia Institute of Marine Geology & Geophysics (the Far East Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences) carried out long wave measurements in the area of South Kuril Islands with the purpose of tsunami recording closely to the seismic active zone and study long wave spectra variability depending of weather conditions. Bottom pressure gauges were installed in several harbors of Shikotan Island, near Cape Lovtsov (north-eastern end of Kunashir Island), in the Kitoviy Bay (Iturup Island) and near Cape Van-der-Lind (Urup Island). Sakhalin Tsunami Center has a cable telemetry tsunami warning station in the Severo-Kurilsk (Paramushir Island). Two tsunamis - a remote Samoa (September 30) and nearby Simushir tsunami (January 15) were recorded by different gauges in the area of South Kuril Islands and by telemetry station in Severo-Kurilsk. To examine spectral properties of long wave oscillations at each gauge, we calculated power spectral estimation using two different data segments (both 1 day length): the period preceding the tsunami event, we identified as “normal” and selected for analysis of the background signal; the “tsunami period” included tsunami caused oscillations.
    [Show full text]
  • Correspondence
    Correspondence http/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E8CC0CD8-AA1A-466B-8446-13B0F4FE4073 E. P. Nartshuk. NEW RECORDS OF THE GRASS FLIES (DIPTERA: CHLOROPIDAE) FROM ITURUP ISLAND (RUSSIA, KURIL ISLANDS). – Far Eastern Entomologist. 2016. N 318: 20-24. Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1., St. Petersburg 199034, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Summary. A list of the 24 species in 16 genera and two subfamilies collected in Kuril Islands is given. Twenty-two species are firstly recorded from Iturup Island. Chlorops mugivorus Nishijma et Kanmiya, 1975 and Rhodesiella tripectinata Kanmiya, 1983 are recorded for the fauna of Russia for the first time. Moreover, Thaumatomyia trifasciata (Zetterstedt, 1848) is firstly recorded from Kuril Islands (Paramushir). Key words: Diptera, Chloropidae, fauna, new records, Kuril Islands, Russia. Э. П. Нарчук. Новые данные о злаковых мухах (Diptera: Chloropidae) острова Итуруп (Россия, Курильские острова) // Дальневосточный энтомолог. 2016. N 318. С. 20-24. Резюме. Приведен список собранных на Курильских островах 24 видов злаковых мух из 16 родов и двух подсемейств. Впервые для острова Итуруп указываются 22 вида. Chlorops mugivorus Nishijma et Kanmiya, 1975 и Rhodesiella tripectinata Kanmiya, 1983 впервые отмечаются в фауне России. Впервые для Курил (о-в Парамушир) указывается Thaumatomyia trifasciata (Zetterstedt, 1848). The Chloropidae is a family of Cyclorrhaphous flies with great taxonomic diversity. Most of species have phytophagous larvae developing in shoots or in inflorescences of grasses and sedges (Poaceae and Cyperaceae). Many species have saprophagous larvae feed on decaying tissues of plants damaged by other insects, in fungi, in rotting wood with mycelia. Some species have carnivorous or parasitic larvae developing in egg cocoons of spider, egg pod of Acrididae and Mantidae, some species are predators of root aphids.
    [Show full text]
  • Iturup Island Pink & Chum Salmon Fishery
    ITURUP ISLAND PINK & CHUM SALMON FISHERY 2012 3rd MSC Surveillance Visit Report Certificate Code: SCS-MFCP-F-0011 SCS Global Services, Inc. 2000 Powell Street, Suite 600 Emeryville, CA 94608, USA January 25, 2013 Prepared for: Polar Bear Enterprise, LLC (for JSC Gidrostroy) 2101 55th Ave N Suite #2 Seattle, WA 98103 General Information Date of Issue 25 January 2013 Prepared by SCS Adrienne Vincent Certification Date 9 September 2009 Certification Expiration Date 8 September 2014 Surveillance Team SCS Adrienne Vincent Ray Beamesderfer Surveillance Stage 3rd Annual Surveillance Methodologies MSC Accreditation Manual Issue 5.1, MSC Fisheries Certification Methodology (FCM) Version 6.1 MSC Fisheries Assessment Manual (FAM) Version 2.1 MSC Certification Requirements 1.2 PREFACE All facts in this report were provided to SCS by JSC Gidrostroy. However, the interpretation, opinions, and assertions made in this report as to the compliance of the fishery with MSC requirements are the sole responsibility of SCS Global Services, Inc. 2 CONTENTS 1. Executive summary ............................................................................................................................................ 4 2. General Background about the Fishery .......................................................................................................... 5 3. Assessment overview .......................................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Methodology ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geoexpro 5 6.05 Omslag
    EXPLORATION Multi-client seismic spurs interest The Northeast Sakhalin Shelf,with several giant fields already discovered and put on production,is recognised as a world-class petroleum province.New seismic acquired in the rest of the Sea of Okhotsk indicate that there is more to be found. Dalmorneftegeofizica Courtesy of TGS has acquired a huge seismic data base covering almost the entire Sea of Okhotsk. New, modern data is now made available through a cooperati- on with TGS Nopec. Photo: Erling Frantzen Courtesy of TGS BP/Rosneft Pela Lache OKHA SAKHALIN Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk The Sea of Okhotsk is named after Okhotsk, the first Russian settlement in the Far East. It is the northwest arm of the Pacific Ocean covering an area of 1,528,000 sq km, lying between the Kamchatka Peninsula on the east, the Kuril Islands on the southeast, the island of Hokkaido belonging to Japan to the far south, the island of Sakhalin along the west, and a long stretch of eastern Siberian coastline along the west and north. Most of the Sea of Okhotsk, except for the area around the Kuril Islands, is frozen during from November to June and has frequent heavy fogs. In the summer, the icebergs melt and the sea becomes navigable again. The sea is generally less than 1,500m deep; its deepest point, near the Kuriles, is 3,363 m. Fishing and crab- bing are carried on off W Kamchatka peninsula. The DMNG/TGS Seismic acquired in 1998, 2004 and 2005 is shown in green, blue and red colours. Note also the location of Okha where oil seeps were found 125 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Deal with Russia （Cultural Internationalism Rather Than Territorial Dispute）
    How To Deal With Russia （Cultural Internationalism Rather Than Territorial Dispute） Hideaki Kinoshita Introduction Considering relations with Russia, it appears to be imperative among the Japanese people to raise the question of the Northern Territories, which comprises the islands of Habomai, Shikotan, Kunashiri and Etorofu. It is because the issue is perceived by the Japanese people as the apparent act of unprovoked aggression initiated during the final stages of World War II by Russian’s illegal and perfidious attack on the Chishima Islands with a sudden shift from relations of friendship to enmity. Japan was actually courting the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics（USSR） to perform as an intermediary for the armistice with the Allied Forces. Russian’s sudden attack unilaterally abrogating the Soviet-Japanese Neutrality Pact concluded in April, 1941 was baffling for the Japanese government, and aroused the impression to the Japanese that they were duped to the committing to the agreement. The agreement specified mutual respect of territorial integrity and inviolability as well as neutrality should one of the contracting parties become the object of hostilities of any third party（Slavinsky 1996: 129）. The Soviet attack no doubt was executed within the validity period of the pact and after the Japanese notification of accepting the Potsdam Declaration on August 15, 1945, and even continued after concluding the armistice on the Battleship Missouri on September 2, 1945（Iokibe, Hatano 2015: 311）. The concept, advocated by the government, of “inherent” Japanese Northern Territories helped foment the idea of the so called “residual” legal rights to the four islands in the Japanese public psyche.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Vaccination, Call the Local Polyclinic Or Fever, Joint Pain, Muscle Pain, Fatigue, CAN PEOPLE WHO HAVE RECOVERED Hospital
    HOW TO REGISTER FOR VACCINATION? - use the Government Services Portal; WHAT ARE THE SIDE EFFECTS OF CAN THE VACCINE BE USED AS AFTER VACCINATION, WHEN CAN - visit the polyclinic in person; THE VACCINE? ARE THERE ANY A TREATMENT FOR PEOPLE WITH THE ANTIBODY LEVEL IN THE BODY - call 1300 (ext. 10). LIMITATIONS FOR PEOPLE WHO COVID-19? BE MEASURED? WHERE CAN I GET VACCINATED? HAVE BEEN VACCINATED? No. The vaccine is designed to prevent The antibody level in the body can Vaccination stations have been opened in every On the first or second day after disease. If a person has symptoms of be measured three weeks after the municipality of the Sakhalin Oblast. You can get vaccinated in the local polyclinic at vaccination, a person may develop COVID-19, vaccination is prohibited. second vaccine injection. the place of residence. For more information on general reactions (flu-like: chills, COVID-19 vaccination, call the local polyclinic or fever, joint pain, muscle pain, fatigue, CAN PEOPLE WHO HAVE RECOVERED hospital. The list of medical facilities and phone numbers is headache; at the injection site: FROM COVID-19 GET VACCINATED given below: soreness, redness, swelling), which AND WHEN? Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk Polyclinic No. 1, tel.: 8 (4242) 227968 may persist for the next three days. There is no prohibition on COVID-19 Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk Polyclinic No. 2, Less commonly, the vaccine causes vaccination for those who have tel.: 8 9028104526 Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk Polyclinic No. 4, nausea, indigestion, decreased recovered from the disease. If there tel.: 8 (4242) 755056 appetite, and swelling of lymph are no contraindications and more than Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk Polyclinic No.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject of the Russian Federation)
    How to use the Atlas The Atlas has two map sections The Main Section shows the location of Russia’s intact forest landscapes. The Thematic Section shows their tree species composition in two different ways. The legend is placed at the beginning of each set of maps. If you are looking for an area near a town or village Go to the Index on page 153 and find the alphabetical list of settlements by English name. The Cyrillic name is also given along with the map page number and coordinates (latitude and longitude) where it can be found. Capitals of regions and districts (raiony) are listed along with many other settlements, but only in the vicinity of intact forest landscapes. The reader should not expect to see a city like Moscow listed. Villages that are insufficiently known or very small are not listed and appear on the map only as nameless dots. If you are looking for an administrative region Go to the Index on page 185 and find the list of administrative regions. The numbers refer to the map on the inside back cover. Having found the region on this map, the reader will know which index map to use to search further. If you are looking for the big picture Go to the overview map on page 35. This map shows all of Russia’s Intact Forest Landscapes, along with the borders and Roman numerals of the five index maps. If you are looking for a certain part of Russia Find the appropriate index map. These show the borders of the detailed maps for different parts of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Marine Mammals (Other Than Western Gray Whales)
    Non-WGW Marine Mammals Chapter 5 Marine Mammals (Other than Western Gray Whales) 5.1 INTRODUCTION During the review of environmental documentation for the Sakhalin II development, the stakeholders to the project outlined a number of concerns and items requiring clarification as a result of reviewing the international-style Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report (SEIC 2003). In brief, the focus of the questions raised by interested parties regarding non western Pacific gray whale included the following matters: • Provision of a map showing locations referred to in the EIA-A text; • Summary information on each of the key referenced surveys to describe the spatial extent in relation to project activities, the experiences of observers, a description of observed mammal behaviour and other relevant data that facilitates reader interpretation; • Further information on Steller’s sea lions, particularly with reference to potential winter use of waters around Aniva Bay and potential impact of project activities on this species; • Assessment of acoustic impacts from project activities on Cuvier’s beaked whale; • Consideration of vessel collision risk, particularly with respect to the North Pacific Right Whale and bowhead whale. Specifically, this section provides additional detail to the baseline information supplied in Section 1.7: Chapter 1 of Environmental Impact Assessment Volume 2: Platforms, Offshore Pipelines and Landfalls (SEIC 2003) - referred to throughout this section as the “EIA” - that describes the characteristics, distribution and protected status of marine mammals in the vicinity of the Sakhalin II Project operations. The additional information covers north-east Sakhalin Island and Aniva Bay and has been drawn from existing and recently published reports and monitoring data that have become available since publication of the original EIA.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding of Floating Marine Litter Distribution in the NOWPAP Region
    1312-32, Yuseong-daero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34103, Republic of Korea Korea Research Institute of Ships and Ocean Engineering (KRISO) Tel: (+82-42) 866-3638, FAX: (+82-42) 866-3630 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://merrac.nowpap.org Understanding of floating marine litter distribution in the NOWPAP region Understanding of floating marine litter distribution in the NOWPAP region 1312-32, Yuseong-daero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34103, Republic of Korea Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering (KRISO) Tel: (+82-42) 866-3638, FAX: (+82-42) 866-3630 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://merrac.nowpap.org NOWPAP MERRAC 1312-32, Yuseong-daero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34103, Republic of Korea Korea Research Institute of Ships and Ocean Engineering (KRISO) Tel: (+82-42) 866-3638, FAX: (+82-42) 866-3630 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://merrac.nowpap.org Understanding of floating marine litter distribution in the NOWPAP region First Published in 2017 by Marine Environmental Emergency Preparedness and Response Regional Activity Centre the Northwest Pacific Action Plan (NOWPAP MERRAC) 1312-32, Yuseong-daero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34103, Republic of Korea Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering (KRISO) Printed in Republic of Korea by Sinkwangsa ISBN 978-89-93604-36-8 Copyright © NOWPAP MERRAC 2017 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may, for sales purposes, be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from the NOWPAP MERRAC. For bibliographical purposes this document may be cited as: MERRAC Technical Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Great Kamchatka Tsunamis, 1737 and 1952 V.K
    TWO GREAT KAMCHATKA TSUNAMIS, 1737 AND 1952 V.K. Gusiakov IUGG Tsunami Commission, Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics, Siberian Division, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pr.Lavrentieva, 6, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia, Email: [email protected] Abstract. The paper is devoted to the comparative study of the two most destructive tsunamis occurred in Kuril-Kamchatka area – October 16, 1737 and November 4, 1952. The Kuril- Kamchatka region is characterized by a very high level of seismic and volcanic activities and it is one of the main tsunami-prone areas in the Pacific. Great earthquakes here are associated with the subduction of the Pacific plate under the Eurasian plate, that occurs along the narrow zone between the axis of the deep-water trench and the island chain. The historical tsunami catalog for the Kuril-Kamchatka region covers the period of 260 years and lists 115 tsunamigenic events with 10 of them resulting in the perceptible damage and loss of lives. Among these destructive tsunamis there are two events which considerably surpass all others in terms of their intensity and the magnitude of damage. They are the October 16, 1737 and the November 4, 1952 tsunamis associated with two most severe and damageable earthquakes whenever occurred in this area. While the 1952 tsunami was the most damageable event in the area for this century, the 1737 tsunami was obviously the strongest event in the Kuril-Kamchatka region whenever observed and one of the largest tsunamis in the Pacific historically known. Such an event, should it happens in the present days, would result in the heavy catastrophe for the Northern Kuriles and the whole eastern coast of Kamchatka.
    [Show full text]
  • 순번 등록국가 등록번호 업체코드 적용일자 취소 업체명 공장소재지 1 러시아 Rk 1-44G 038220 20131227
    순번 등록국가 등록번호 업체코드 적용일자 유예처리 From-To 취소 업체명 공장소재지 1 러시아 RK 1-44G 038220 20131227 ~ "Nord-Cap" Ltd.-Borey 27А, Kolsky ave., Murmansk Tcepliaeva str., 3 v. Oktyabrsky, Ust'- 2 러시아 RK-0-001 035456 20130710 ~ 2013-07-10 "VITAZ-AVTO CO.,LTD" Bolsheretskiy district, Kamchatskiy Kray 3 러시아 RK-0-004 035457 20120720 ~ 2013-12-27 "Arbat" Co., Ltd.-Vodoley-1 1, Vokzalnay Str., Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy 43, Shturmana Elagina str.,Petropavlovsk- 4 러시아 RK-0-005 036555 20130130 ~ 2013-12-27 "AKROS" Fishing JSC -Uzon Kamchatskiy 43, Shturmana Elagina str.,Petropavlovsk- 5 러시아 RK-0-006 036554 20130130 ~ 2013-12-27 "AKROS" Fishing JSC-ОSSОRА Kamchatskiy PJSC "NBAMR" (Public Joint Stock Company 6 러시아 RK-0-011 035460 20120720 ~ 2015-07-23 "Nakhodka Active Marine Fishery Base")-Antares 5, Makarova str.,Nakhodka 12, Zelenaya str., Podyapolsk, Shkotovskiy 7 러시아 RK-0-012 035461 20130513 ~ 2013-05-13 JSC "Fishery Kolkhoz "Primorets" - Podyapolsk district Primorskiy Kray 51-A, Svetlanskaya str., Vladivostok Primorskiy 8 러시아 RK-0-013 035462 20191007 ~ 2019-10-07 JSC "Dalryba" Zaliv Olgi Kray 51-A, Svetlanskaya str., Vladivostok Primorskiy 9 러시아 RK-0-015 035463 20201016 ~ 2020-10-16 JSC "Dalryba" Tugur Kray 51-A, Svetlanskaya str., Vladivostok Primorskiy 10 러시아 RK-0-016 035464 20200213 ~ 2020-02-13 JSC "Dalryba"-Yuriy Orel Kray 11 러시아 RK-0-017 035465 20120720 ~ 2017-11-24 "Orion" Co., Ltd-Yantar' 33 of. 7, 39, Dzerzhinskogo str., Khabarovsk off.221, 246A, Lenina str. Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk 12 러시아 RK-0-018 035466 20201016 ~ "Flagman DV" Сo.Ltd.-Yantar' 1 Sakhalinskaya Oblast’ 13 러시아 RK-0-019 035467 20120720 ~ 2017-11-24 "Orion" Co., Ltd-Orion 501 of.
    [Show full text]