DOCSLIB.ORG

Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Litigation & Dispute Resolution 2018 Seventh Edition Contributing Editor: Michael Madden GLOBAL LEGAL INSIGHTS – LITIGATION & DISPUTE RESOLUTION 2018, SEVENTH EDITION Contributing Editor Michael Madden Production Editor Andrew Schofi eld Senior Editors Suzie Levy Caroline Collingwood Group Consulting Editor Alan Falach Publisher Rory Smith We are extremely grateful for all contributions to this edition. Special thanks are reserved for Michael Madden for all his assistance. Published by Global Legal Group Ltd. 59 Tanner Street, London SE1 3PL, United Kingdom Tel: +44 207 367 0720 / URL: www.glgroup.co.uk Copyright © 2018 Global Legal Group Ltd. All rights reserved No photocopying ISBN 978-1-912509-29-4 ISSN 2049-3126 This publication is for general information purposes only. It does not purport to provide comprehensive full legal or other advice. Global Legal Group Ltd. and the contributors accept no responsibility for losses that may arise from reliance upon information contained in this publication. This publication is intended to give an indication of legal issues upon which you may need advice. Full legal advice should be taken from a qualifi ed professional when dealing with specifi c situations. The information contained herein is accurate as of the date of publication. Printed and bound by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY August 2018 CONTENTS Preface Michael Madden, Winston & Strawn London LLP Australia Colin Loveday, Richard Abraham & Sheena McKie, Clayton Utz 1 Bermuda David Kessaram, Matthew Watson & Sam Riihiluoma, Cox Hallett Wilkinson Limited 14 Brazil Eduardo Perazza & Ariana Anfe, Machado, Meyer, Sendacz & Opice Advogados 25 British Virgin Islands Scott Cruickshank & Matthew Freeman, Lennox Paton 32 Cayman Islands Ian Huskisson, Anna Peccarino & Neil McLarnon, Travers Thorp Alberga 47 China Cui Qiang & Li Qishi, Commerce & Finance Law Offi ces 55 England & Wales Michael Madden & Justin McClelland, Winston & Strawn London LLP 62 Finland Markus Kokko & Niki J. Welling, Borenius Attorneys Ltd 96 France Olivier Laude, Victor Champey & Olivier Guillaud, Laude Esquier Champey 105 Germany Dr Thomas Nebel & Thomas Weimann, Herbert Smith Freehills Germany LLP 121 Greece Spyros G. Alexandris & Eirini Panopoulou, Bahas, Gramatidis & Partners 131 India Rishi Agrawala & Vishnu Tallapragada, Agarwal Law Associates 141 Italy Micael Montinari & Filippo Frigerio, Portolano Cavallo 149 Japan Shinya Tago, Takuya Uenishi & Landry Guesdon, Iwata Godo 160 Liechtenstein Thomas Nigg, Eva-Maria Rhomberg & Domenik Vogt, GASSER PARTNER Attorneys at Law 173 Malaysia Datuk Peter S.K. Yap, Amin, Yap & Co. Mark Ho, Chellam Wong Ooi Huey Miin, Raja, Darryl & Loh 183 Mexico Miguel Angel Hernandez-Romo Valencia & Miguel Angel Hernandez Romo, Foley Gardere Arena 195 Romania Silvia Uscov, USCOV | Attorneys at law 202 Russia Dr Viktor Gerbutov & Artem Kara, Noerr 209 Singapore Chia Boon Teck & Wong Kai Yun, Chia Wong LLP 217 Spain Pedro Moreira & Isabel Álvarez, SCA LEGAL, SLP 227 Switzerland Balz Gross, Claudio Bazzani & Julian Schwaller, Homburger 239 Taiwan Hung Ou Yang, Hung-Wen Chiu & Jia-Jun Fang, Brain Trust International Law Firm 254 Turkey Orçun Çetinkaya & Burak Baydar, Moroğlu Arseven 261 Turks & Caicos Tim Prudhoe, Prudhoe Caribbean 268 Islands Ukraine Oleksandr Zavadetskyi, Zavadetskyi Advocates Bureau 278 UAE Hamdan Al Shamsi, Hamdan AlShamsi Lawyers and Legal Consultants 288 USA Rodney G. Strickland, Jr., Matthew R. Reed & Anthony J Weibell, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C. 299 PREFACE very year we are bombarded with commentaries on the legal profession with law fi rms being rated often, in terms of Eprofi tability or by reference to client, competitor or other surveys. While these commentaries provide certain perspectives on how we as lawyers may be performing they cannot, and to be fair they generally do not purport to, provide the entire picture of the work undertaken by lawyers around the world and the vital role the profession plays in supporting one of the central pillars of any democratic constitution. The structure of a nation’s constitution and the degree to which the powers comprised within the executive, judicial and legislative branches are separate and independent is a useful indicator of the approach taken by that constitution to values such as political and individual freedoms and human rights – although essential to that measure is the extent to which the members of each branch, particularly the legal and judicial, strive to maintain their independence and to play a fundamental role in preserving a true separation of powers. It can be all too easy for today’s “high fl ying” commercial lawyers, sitting in their modern, air-conditioned offi ces, working on transactions or disputes worth $ billions, and strategising on securing the next profi table instruction to maintain their fi rm’s status in the directories, to forget that they are part of that profession and subject to the duties and responsibilities this creates. However, the legal systems in which they operate are the same systems that are responsible for preserving essential human rights and for keeping the other sources of power within the constitution in check. It is as much in their interest, as it is for lawyers more directly involved in cases where human rights and liberties are being threatened, to ensure that their legal system operates with integrity and effi ciently, and that access to justice is readily available and preserved for the benefi t of all and not just those with the right political connections or the fi nances to afford it. In preparing this year’s edition of Global Legal Insights – Litigation and Dispute Resolution we sought comments from contributors on the costs and funding of litigation. The rapid growth of the litigation funding industry, following the relaxation of medieval principles such as Maintenance and Champerty, refl ects a need within society to provide better access to justice. However, the provision of such services needs to be monitored to ensure that users still obtain independent advice and benefi t from the proceeds of any successful claim. Next year we will consider in further detail how different legal systems operate to preserve their independence and promote diversity within the administration of justice. I do hope that you enjoy reading (or at least dipping in and out of) the book and I would like once again to pay my thanks to all those who have contributed and worked very hard to secure its publication. As always, I welcome any feedback that you may have on this Global Legal Insight. Michael Madden Winston & Strawn London LLP Australia Colin Loveday, Richard Abraham & Sheena McKie Clayton Utz Effi ciency of process Australia has a federal system of government, in which powers are divided between a central government and individual States. Each State and Territory is a separate jurisdiction and has its own hierarchy of courts. The High Court of Australia unites the various court hierarchies. It is the ultimate court of appeal for all Australian courts. State and Territory Supreme Courts hear monetary claims above a certain threshold (typically, from A$750,000), or claims for equitable relief. Each State Supreme Court has an appellate division, or Court of Appeal, which hears appeals from the Supreme Court and lower courts in the State system. Most of the States have two further levels of inferior courts. In addition, some States have established specialist courts of limited statutory jurisdiction, designed to hear specifi c categories of disputes. The jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia (Federal Court) covers almost all civil matters arising under Australian federal law. All civil matters are heard by a judge alone. Appeals from a single judge are heard by the Full Federal Court – a court constituted by three Federal Court judges. The Federal Circuit Court hears less complex disputes. There are also a range of tribunals created under Commonwealth law. For example, the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. In the Federal and several State jurisdictions, legislation has been enacted to impose pre- litigation requirements on persons involved in civil disputes. While generally a failure to comply with pre-litigation requirements will not invalidate the proceedings, the court may take this into consideration when awarding costs associated with the proceedings. In the Federal Court, the parties to a dispute are required to fi le a “genuine steps statement”, which outlines the steps taken to attempt to resolve the dispute. Proceedings are commenced by way of originating process. Once service has been effected and the defendant entered an appearance, the parties exchange pleadings (such as a statement of claim and defence), which serve to defi ne the issues in dispute. Once the parties have closed their pleadings, the parties will give discovery (or “disclosure”). Subpoenas may be used to obtain documents from third parties. In most jurisdictions, discovery and inspection takes place before the parties serve the evidence on which they intend to rely at trial. Each party will then prepare its evidence for use at the fi nal hearing, often utilising written witness statements or affi davits in place of oral evidence in chief – there is no deposition procedure in Australia. Where relevant, parties may also engage expert witnesses to give GLI - Litigation & Dispute Resolution 2018, 7th Edition 1 www.globallegalinsights.com © Published and reproduced with kind permission by Global Legal Group Ltd, London Clayton Utz Australia evidence concerning fi elds of specialised knowledge. Most Australian jurisdictions have Codes of Conduct with which expert witnesses must comply. Occasionally, the court will direct both parties’ experts to prepare a joint report, setting out their areas of agreement and disagreement. Throughout the proceedings, the parties will attend court at regular intervals for case management. At directions hearings, orders will be made to govern the conduct of the matter. Once all the parties’ evidence has been prepared and all the interlocutory disputes resolved, the case proceeds to a fi nal hearing. Most civil cases are heard by a judge sitting alone, who will usually deliver a written judgment.
Recommended publications
  • Arbitration Act 1996

    Arbitration Act 1996

    Status: This version of this Act contains provisions that are prospective. Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Arbitration Act 1996. (See end of Document for details) Arbitration Act 1996 1996 CHAPTER 23 An Act to restate and improve the law relating to arbitration pursuant to an arbitration agreement; to make other provision relating to arbitration and arbitration awards; and for connected purposes. [17th June 1996] Be it enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— Extent Information E1 This Act extends to England, Wales and Northern Ireland; for exceptions see s.108 Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Act modified (11.11.1999) by 1999 c. 31, s. 8(1)(2) (with application as mentioned in s. 10(2)(3)) C2 Act excluded (31.1.1997) by 1966 c. 41, s. 3 (as substituted by 1996 c. 23, s. 107(1), Sch. 3 para. 24 (with s. 81(2)); S.I. 1996/3146, art. 3 (with transitional provisions in art. 4, Sch. 2) Act excluded (1.8.1998) by 1992 c. 52, s. 212A(6) (as inserted (1.8.1998) by 1998 c. 8, s. 7; S.I. 1998/1658, art. 2(1), Sch. 1 Act excluded (N.I.) (1.3.1999) by S.I. 1998/3162 (N.I. 21), art. 89(6); S.R. 1999/81, art. 3 Act excluded (31.3.2002) by The Dairy Produce Quotas Regulations 2002 (S.I.
  • Arbitration Procedures and Practice in the UK (England and Wales): Overview by Justin Williams, Hamish Lal and Richard Hornshaw, Akin Gump LLP

    Arbitration Procedures and Practice in the UK (England and Wales): Overview by Justin Williams, Hamish Lal and Richard Hornshaw, Akin Gump LLP

    Arbitration procedures and practice in the UK (England..., Practical Law Country... Arbitration procedures and practice in the UK (England and Wales): overview by Justin Williams, Hamish Lal and Richard Hornshaw, Akin Gump LLP Country Q&A | Law stated as at 01-Dec-2018 | England, Wales A Q&A guide to arbitration law and practice in the UK (England and Wales). The country-specific Q&A guide provides a structured overview of the key practical issues concerning arbitration in this jurisdiction, including any mandatory provisions and default rules applicable under local law, confidentiality, local courts' willingness to assist arbitration, enforcement of awards and the available remedies, both final and interim. To compare answers across multiple jurisdictions visit the Arbitration procedures and practice Country Q&A Tool. This Q&A is part of the global guide to arbitration. For a full list of jurisdictional Q&As visit www.practicallaw.com/arbitration- guide. Use of arbitration and recent trends 1. How is commercial arbitration used and what are the recent trends? Use of commercial arbitration and recent trends Commercial arbitration remains the preferred dispute resolution procedure for international transactions. The full implications of Brexit for arbitration in the UK are being closely monitored by practitioners, but it does not appear to have had any immediate impact. In fact, Queen Mary University of London's 2018 International Arbitration Survey (Survey) has reported a predominant view that the use of London as a seat is unlikely to be affected. This is unsurprising, given that the primary attractions of London should remain the same, namely the reliability of the neutrality and impartiality of the English judiciary; the support for the arbitral process offered by English courts and the Arbitration Act 1996; and the UK's position as a signatory to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 (New York Convention).
  • Arbitration Act 1996

    Arbitration Act 1996

    Status: This version of this Act contains provisions that are prospective. Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Arbitration Act 1996. (See end of Document for details) Arbitration Act 1996 1996 CHAPTER 23 An Act to restate and improve the law relating to arbitration pursuant to an arbitration agreement; to make other provision relating to arbitration and arbitration awards; and for connected purposes. [17th June 1996] Be it enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— Extent Information E1 This Act extends to England, Wales and Northern Ireland; for exceptions see s.108 Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Act modified (11.11.1999) by 1999 c. 31, s. 8(1)(2) (with application as mentioned in s. 10(2)(3)) C2 Act excluded (31.1.1997) by 1966 c. 41, s. 3 (as substituted by 1996 c. 23, s. 107(1), Sch. 3 para. 24 (with s. 81(2)); S.I. 1996/3146, art. 3 (with transitional provisions in art. 4, Sch. 2) Act excluded (1.8.1998) by 1992 c. 52, s. 212A(6) (as inserted (1.8.1998) by 1998 c. 8, s. 7; S.I. 1998/1658, art. 2(1), Sch. 1 Act excluded (N.I.) (1.3.1999) by S.I. 1998/3162 (N.I. 21), art. 89(6); S.R. 1999/81, art. 3 Act excluded (31.3.2002) by The Dairy Produce Quotas Regulations 2002 (S.I.
  • The Role of Smart Power in U.S.-Spain Relations, 1969-1986

    The Role of Smart Power in U.S.-Spain Relations, 1969-1986

    THE ROLE OF SMART POWER IN U.S.-SPAIN RELATIONS, 1969-1986 By DAVID A. JUSTICE Bachelor of Arts in History Athens State University Athens, Alabama 2012 Master of Arts in History University of North Alabama Florence, Alabama 2014 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May, 2020 THE ROLE OF SMART POWER IN U.S.-SPAIN RELATIONS, 1969-1986 Dissertation Approved: Dr. Laura Belmonte Dissertation Adviser Dr. Douglas Miller Dr. Matthew Schauer Dr. Isabel Álvarez-Sancho ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation, this labor of love, would not be complete if it were not for a number of people. First, I would like to thank my dissertation committee of brilliant scholars. My advisor Laura Belmonte was integral in shaping this work and myself as an academic. Since my arrival at Oklahoma State, Dr. B has crafted me into the scholar that I am now. Her tireless encouragement, editing of multiple drafts, and support of this ever evolving project will always be appreciated. She also provided me with numerous laughs from the presidential pups, Willy and James. Doug Miller has championed my work since we began working together, and his candor and unconditional support was vital to finishing. Also, our discussions of Major League Baseball were much needed during coursework. Matt Schauer’s mentorship was integral to my time at Oklahoma State. The continuous laughter and support during meetings, along with discussions of classic films, were vital to my time at Oklahoma State.
  • IDENTITY and EMIGRATION in the WORKS of JULIA ALVAREZ, CRISTINA Garcia, ESMERALDA SANTIAGO and MARIA AMPARO ESCANDON MARTA VIZCA

    IDENTITY and EMIGRATION in the WORKS of JULIA ALVAREZ, CRISTINA Garcia, ESMERALDA SANTIAGO and MARIA AMPARO ESCANDON MARTA VIZCA

    IDENTITY AND EMIGRATION IN THE WORKS OF JULIA ALVAREZ, CRISTINA GARCiA, ESMERALDA SANTIAGO AND MARIA AMPARO ESCANDON MARTA VIZCAYA ECHANO PHD THE UNIVERSITY OF YORK DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH AND RELATED LITERATURE JUNE 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgments vi Abstract vii INTRODUCTION 1 PART I Auto/biography, Fiction and Social Concerns 22 CHAPTER 1 Life-Writing and Social Commitment 23 i Problematising Authorial Social 24 Commitment ii Different Possibilities of Life-Writing 30 iii Representing Individual and Collective 43 Identities CHAPTER 2 Questions of Genre 51 i Butterflies: Testimonial Novel And 53 Historiographic Metafiction ii Under the Shadow of Magical Realism: 64 Garcia and Escand6n PART II History, Culture and Immigration 74 CHAPTER 3 Garcia's DC and TAS: 'Is Mercy More 78 Important than Truth?' i Cultural Presences in Cuban 80 Identity ii National and Family Histories 82 iii Gender Struggles and Historical 85 (Re)Constructions iv Physical and Psychological Exiles 91 i DC: 'What Unknown Covenants 93 11 Led Ultimately to This Hour And This Solitude?' ii TAS: 'Everyone's Vision's Splintered' 97 v Garcia and the Cuban American 103 Novel CHAPTER 4 History in Alvarez's Auto/Biographical Fictions 107 i Revising Dominican History 109 i The Conquest 110 ii Trujillo's Era 112 iii After the Dictatorship 116 iv Relations With Cuba 118 vi U.S.-Dominican Relations and 120 Immigration vii "Was It for This, The Sacrifice of the 123 Butterflies?" ii Questions of Gender, Race, and Class 129 i Class Structures and Social Mobility 129 ii
  • 17Th ANNUAL REVIEW of the ARBITRATION ACT 1996 BIICL and SIMMONS & SIMMONS CONFERENCE on 26/3/2019

    17Th ANNUAL REVIEW of the ARBITRATION ACT 1996 BIICL and SIMMONS & SIMMONS CONFERENCE on 26/3/2019

    17th ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996 BIICL AND SIMMONS & SIMMONS CONFERENCE ON 26/3/2019 “THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN JUDGES AND ARBITRATORS” KEYNOTE LECTURE BY SIR RUPERT JACKSON 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 This conference. This is a timely conference. The importance of international arbitration to successful international trade has been reaffirmed by the Supreme Court in Taurus Petroleum Ltd v State Oil Marketing Co [2017] UKSC 64 at [54]. London is a major centre of international arbitration, supported by the Commercial Court within the framework of the Arbitration Act 1996 (‘the 1996 Act’). The present conference will focus on recent developments in arbitration law, with particular reference to challenges under ss. 67 and 68 of the 1996 Act. 1.2 This lecture. In this lecture I will go off piste for a few minutes to talk about s.45 of the 1996 Act, before turning to the core issues under discussion today. 2. SECTION 45 OF THE 1996 ACT AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE COURTS AND ARBITRATORS 2.1 Section 45. The recent Commercial Court decision Goodwood Investments Holdings Inc v Thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions AG [2018] EWHC 1056 (Comm) has focused attention on a little used provision of the Arbitration Act 1996, namely s. 45. That section provides: “(1)Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the court may on the application of a party to arbitral proceedings (upon notice to the other parties) determine any question of law arising in the course of the proceedings which the court is satisfied substantially affects the rights of one or more of the parties.
  • Copyright by Gregory Gierhart Helmick 2009

    Copyright by Gregory Gierhart Helmick 2009

    Copyright by Gregory Gierhart Helmick 2009 The Dissertation Committee for Gregory Gierhart Helmick certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: ARCHIVAL DISSONANCE IN THE CUBAN POST-EXILE HISTORICAL NOVEL Committee: _____________________________________ César A. Salgado, Supervisor _____________________________________ Jossianna Arroyo-Martínez _____________________________________ Naomi E. Lindstrom _____________________________________ Nicolas Shumway _____________________________________ Harold A. Wylie, Jr. ARCHIVAL DISSONANCE IN THE CUBAN POST-EXILE HISTORICAL NOVEL by Gregory Gierhart Helmick, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin December 2009 Dedication This dissertation is for Joanna, Samuel, and James. Acknowledgments I would like to express appreciation to the members of my committee for participating in this project through its conclusion. I am grateful to Naomi Lindstrom for having proofread and provided commentary on hundreds of pages of draft material. I especially owe a debt of gratitude to my dissertation supervisor César Salgado for his critical efforts in support of this project and for his mentorship. I would like to acknowledge the indispensable support of family and friends, beginning with Joanna, her parents Vera and Vito, and my mother Glenda. Finally, I would like to express appreciation to Jorge Febles, Roberto G. Fernández, and Gustavo Pérez Firmat for discussing the project with me in 2006. v ARCHIVAL DISSONANCE IN THE CUBAN POST-EXILE HISTORICAL NOVEL Publication No. ____________ Gregory Gierhart Helmick, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin, 2009 Supervisor: César A.
  • Arbitration Act 1996 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 15 April 2019

    Arbitration Act 1996 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 15 April 2019

    Status: This version of this Act contains provisions that are prospective. Changes to legislation: Arbitration Act 1996 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 15 April 2019. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) Arbitration Act 1996 1996 CHAPTER 23 An Act to restate and improve the law relating to arbitration pursuant to an arbitration agreement; to make other provision relating to arbitration and arbitration awards; and for connected purposes. [17th June 1996] Be it enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— Annotations: Extent Information E1 This Act extends to England, Wales and Northern Ireland; for exceptions see s.108 Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Act modified (11.11.1999) by 1999 c. 31, s. 8(1)(2) (with application as mentioned in s. 10(2)(3)) C2 Act excluded (31.1.1997) by 1966 c. 41, s. 3 (as substituted by 1996 c. 23, s. 107(1), Sch. 3 para. 24 (with s. 81(2)); S.I. 1996/3146, art. 3 (with transitional provisions in art. 4, Sch. 2) Act excluded (1.8.1998) by 1992 c. 52, s. 212A(6) (as inserted (1.8.1998) by 1998 c. 8, s. 7; S.I.
  • Reconfiguring the American Family: Alternate Paradigms in African American and Latina Familial Configurations Mary Elizabeth Wright

    Reconfiguring the American Family: Alternate Paradigms in African American and Latina Familial Configurations Mary Elizabeth Wright

    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2002 Reconfiguring the American Family: Alternate Paradigms in African American and Latina Familial Configurations Mary Elizabeth Wright Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES RECONFIGURING THE AMERICAN FAMILY: ALTERNATE PARADIGMS IN AFRICAN AMERICAN AND LATINA FAMILIAL CONFIGURATIONS By MARY ELIZABETH WRIGHT A dissertation submitted to the Department of English in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2002 Copyright 2002 Mary E. Wright All Rights Reserved The members of the Committee approve the dissertation of Mary Elizabeth Wright defended on October 11, 2002. Bonnie Braendlin Professor Directing Donna Nudd Outside Committee Member Linda Saladin Committee Member Jerrilyn McGregory Committee Member Approved: Hunt Hawkins, Chair, Department of English The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the abovenamed committee members. ii Dedication To June Walters Wright (October 13, 1924-October 3, 1984) Because each paragraph pays homage to equally important entities that influenced and informed my personal and professional life, chronology as opposed to level of importance seems an appropriate method of thanks. I first thank my parents, Eugene W. Wright and June Walters Wright for their kind, persistent, and loving parentage. Theirs served as my indoctrination into familial theory, though of a different variety than the scholarly approach, and my one regret is that my mother couldn’t be here to accept this tribute to her wonderful and loving parenting.
  • Judicial Control of Arbitral Awards in the United Kingdom

    Judicial Control of Arbitral Awards in the United Kingdom

    23 Judicial Control of Arbitral Awards in the United Kingdom Andrew Tetley* 1introduction This book provides a forum for discussion of current issues and debates in international arbitration, covering the independence and impartiality of arbitrators; how conflicting interests may affect the conduct of arbitrators; the enforcement of arbitral awards, principally under grounds of procedural irregularity; how to resolve issues of misconduct by arbitrators during proceedings; and the current judicial interpretation of arbitration clauses. In England, the key legislation which governs these issues is contained in the Arbitration Act 1996 (the Arbitration Act). Also influential in shaping these issues are the procedural rules of specific arbitral insti- tutions, and the guidance published by organisations such as the International Bar Association (the IBA). 2 vacating commercial arbitration awards 2.1 Independence and Impartiality of International Arbitrators It is of fundamental importance that international arbitrators are both independent and impar- tial. It is a human right that ‘everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable 1 time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law’. Arbitration, although not entirely compatible with such description, is a consensual process which has been held to fall 2 within this right. All arbitral tribunals have a duty to act fairly and impartially between the 3 parties while conducting the arbitration proceedings and while exercising any of its powers 4 including in relation to procedure and evidence. 5 Independence is easier to demonstrate than impartiality. There are typically objective indicators of proximity or reliance by an arbitrator on a particular party or group.
  • The Commonwealth Secretariat Arbitral Tribunal: the Evolution and Explanation of Changes to the Tribunal’S Statute

    The Commonwealth Secretariat Arbitral Tribunal: the Evolution and Explanation of Changes to the Tribunal’S Statute

    Chapter 10 The Commonwealth Secretariat Arbitral Tribunal: The Evolution and Explanation of Changes to the Tribunal’s Statute Alice Lacourt* Abstract This chapter seeks to interrogate the rationale for the establishment of the Common- wealth Secretariat Arbitral Tribunal (csat) and examine how the Statute creating the Tribunal has evolved. Several applicants in the early cases before csat brought parallel litigation before the domestic courts of the United Kingdom. Arguments based on lo- cal law acted as a counterpoint to developments in the case law and Statute of csat. The resulting csat decisions delineated key principles on human rights and access to justice, which are still relevant today. csat—and the nature of the applications before it—continues to evolve, and this chapter concludes by identifying some lessons learned so far and what to expect going forward. 1 Introduction This chapter is divided into six sections. In this first section, the domestic law framework of the Commonwealth Secretariat is considered, together with identifying the present-day principle features of the Commonwealth Secre- tariat Arbitral Tribunal (csat), as well as the wider context. Sections 2 and 3 provide a brief history of the Commonwealth Secretariat and overview of its organizational structure and governance, respectively. Section 4 examines how employment-related disputes were initially resolved at the Common- wealth Secretariat and the factors that led up to and informed the establish- ment of csat. Section 5 then analyses how the early cases before the Tribunal in fact shaped csat, together with the evolving roles of the Board of Governors * Alice Lacourt, Legal Counsel, Commonwealth Secretariat, [email protected].
  • Who's on First?

    Who's on First?

    Sue's on First Lessons learned from the oral histories of women baseball players Who's on First? An Honors Thesis (HONRS 499) by Joy Schmoll Advisor: Mark Kornmann Ball State University Muncie, Indiana May 2004 Graduating Spring 2004 Abstract , . :.!'r The girls who played in the All-American Girls Professional Baseball League of the 1940s and 1950s are often credited as pioneers whose accomplishments continue to have far- reaching effects for women. The purpose of this project is to bring new relevance to women's baseball. The current era of professional baseball has been challenged by conservative fans as lacking the strategy, the respectability, and the significance of earlier periods. I propose that by applying an understanding of the history of the AAGPBL to Major League Baseball today, the spirit of the game can be revived. The issues highlighted in this paper as a springboard for considering men's and women's baseball include fan relations, player attitude, and team organization, which are discussed within a framework of historical literature, scholarly journals, scrapbooks, and personal interviews. Acknowledgements I would like to thank Mark Kommann for advising me during the course of this project. His unending flexibility and support allowed the project to unfold naturally, and I could not have completed it without his connections in the Ball State and baseball communities. I am extremely grateful for his encouragement throughout the semester. I would also like to thank the former players of the All-American Girls Professional Baseball League, Isabel Alvarez, Shirley Burkovich, Helen Hannah Campbell, Audrey Haine Daniels, Jane Moffet, Beans Risinger, and Dolly White, for taking the time to share their memories and stories with me.