Remote Indigenous Housing Procurement: a Comparative Study AHURI Final Report, 2011; (167): Pp
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PUBLISHED VERSION James Davidson, Paul Memmott, Carroll Go-Sam and Elizabeth Grant Remote Indigenous housing procurement: a comparative study AHURI Final Report, 2011; (167): pp. i-xiii, 1-143 © Copyright 2011 AHURI http://www.ahuri.edu.au/research/final-reports/167 PERMISSIONS As per email correspondence from AHURI Received: Friday 28 June 2013 1:29pm http://hdl.handle.net/2440/67217 Remote Indigenous housing procurement: a comparative study authored by James Davidson, Paul Memmott, Carroll Go-Sam and Elizabeth Grant for the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Queensland Research Centre April 2011 AHURI Final Report No. 167 ISSN: 1834-7223 ISBN: 978-1-921610-70-7 Authors Davidson, James University of Queensland Memmott, Paul University of Queensland Go-Sam, Carroll University of Queensland Grant, Elizabeth University of Adelaide Title Remote Indigenous housing procurement: a comparative study ISBN 978-1-921610-70-7 Format PDF Key Words Remote, Indigenous, housing, procurement, comparative, study Editor Jim Davison AHURI National Office Publisher Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Melbourne, Australia Series AHURI Final Report; no. 167 ISSN 1834-7223 Preferred Citation Davidson, J. et al. (2011) Remote Indigenous housing procurement: a comparative study, AHURI Final Report No.167. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This material was produced with funding from the Australian Government and the Australian states and territory governments. AHURI Limited gratefully acknowledges the financial and other support it has received from these governments, without which this work would not have been possible. AHURI comprises a network of universities clustered into Research Centres across Australia. Research Centre contributions, both financial and in-kind, have made the completion of this report possible. DISCLAIMER AHURI Limited is an independent, non-political body which has supported this project as part of its programme of research into housing and urban development, which it hopes will be of value to policy-makers, researchers, industry and communities. The opinions in this publication reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of AHURI Limited, its Board or its funding organisations. No responsibility is accepted by AHURI Limited or its Board or its funders for the accuracy or omission of any statement, opinion, advice or information in this publication. AHURI FINAL REPORT SERIES AHURI Final Reports is a refereed series presenting the results of original research to a diverse readership of policy makers, researchers and practitioners. PEER REVIEW STATEMENT An objective assessment of all reports published in the AHURI Final Report Series by carefully selected experts in the field ensures that material of the highest quality is published. The AHURI Final Report Series employs a double-blind peer review of the full Final Report – where anonymity is strictly observed between authors and referees. ii CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................... VI LIST OF FIGURES .....................................................................................................VII ACRONYMS ..............................................................................................................VIII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 1 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 10 1.1 The study and its aims ....................................................................................... 11 1.2 Research background ........................................................................................ 12 1.3 Research questions ........................................................................................... 14 1.4 Understanding contractual systems in procurement ........................................... 15 1.4.1 Documented Design contracts .................................................................. 15 1.4.2 Design Development and Construct (DD&C) contracts ............................. 16 1.4.3 Other contractual forms............................................................................. 16 1.4.4 Alliance contracting ................................................................................... 18 1.5 Understanding the social and economic capitals of Indigenous housing procurement ....................................................................................................... 21 1.5.1 Social capitals ........................................................................................... 21 1.5.2 Cultural and ethical capitals in procurement .............................................. 21 1.5.3 Health capitals and procurement ............................................................... 21 1.5.4 Employment and training capitals in procurement ..................................... 22 1.5.5 Governance capitals in procurement ......................................................... 22 1.6 Methodological approach and case study design ............................................... 22 2 CASE STUDY: THURSDAY ISLAND (QLD) ..................................................... 25 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 25 2.2 The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Housing Unit ...................................... 26 2.3 The Thursday Island Redevelopment Project ..................................................... 27 2.4 Project planning strategies ................................................................................. 29 2.5 Project management and staging strategies ...................................................... 30 2.5.1 TIRP staging strategies ............................................................................. 31 2.6 Capitals of the TIRP procurement process ......................................................... 34 2.6.1 Social and governance.............................................................................. 34 2.6.2 Training and employment .......................................................................... 38 2.6.3 Health capitals .......................................................................................... 39 2.7 Recommendations for procuring housing in remote Indigenous communities .... 39 2.7.1 Major positives arising from TIRP ............................................................. 40 2.7.2 Potential improvements in TIRP ................................................................ 41 2.7.3 Additional considerations .......................................................................... 43 2.7.4 Final statement on the TIRP case study .................................................... 43 3 CASE STUDY: NORMANTON (QLD) ............................................................... 44 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 44 3.2 Overview of Bynoe CACS .................................................................................. 45 iii 3.3 Overview of NAHS ............................................................................................. 46 3.4 Project planning strategies ................................................................................. 47 3.5 Project management and staging strategies ...................................................... 47 3.6 Capitals of the Normanton NAHS procurement process ..................................... 50 3.6.1 Social and cultural ..................................................................................... 50 3.6.2 Governance and leadership ...................................................................... 51 3.6.3 Training and employment .......................................................................... 51 3.7 Recommendations from NAHS Bynoe for housing procurement in remote Indigenous communities .................................................................................... 53 3.7.1 A project manager’s perspective ............................................................... 53 3.7.2 A building contractor’s perspective ............................................................ 54 3.7.3 An ICHO perspective ................................................................................ 56 3.8 Final statement on the Normanton case study ................................................... 57 4 CASE STUDY: KOONIBBA (SA) ...................................................................... 58 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 58 4.2 Measuring housing need in SA .......................................................................... 59 4.3 Measuring housing need at Koonibba ................................................................ 61 4.4 Koonibba housing procurement and related initiatives ....................................... 64 4.4.1 Fixing Housing for Better Health (FHBH) .................................................. 64 4.4.2 The West Coast Building Training Initiative (2000–2006) .......................... 67 4.4.3 Koonibba Building Pty Ltd ......................................................................... 68 4.5 Challenges to building