Quick viewing(Text Mode)

New Hypergeometric Connection Formulae Between Fibonacci And

New Hypergeometric Connection Formulae Between Fibonacci And

arXiv:1505.06697v1 [math.NT] 25 May 2015 l;cneto offiins yegoercfunctions hypergeometric coefficients; connection als; mtcasi h rprisejydb hs ubr.Teb thes which The in applications numbers. the these of by some exhibits enjoyed [14], c properties Koshy, mathematics, the the in in justifies statistics ematicians numbers and theory these graph biology, of physics, applications of spectrum rmtesqec fFbnciplnmasb setting by numb Fibonacci Fibonacci of of sequence sequence the the fact, from In relations. currence h eeecsteefreape nsc identities. such on examples for there references generalization identiti the their developing and numbers, in Fibonacci invested A polynomials, been has properties. ingenuity analytic matical and provides combinatorial sake their own concerning their seque for other polynomials and Fibonacci numbers studying clo Fibonacci of the qualities polynomials, the Fibonacci standing on acquire we knowledge more Keywords: h aiyo ioac polynomials Fibonacci of family The ioac ubr peri eea icpie fmdr s modern of disciplines several in appear numbers Fibonacci ahmtc ujc lsicto:4C0 35;3C5 3 33C25; 33A50; 42C10; Classification: Subject Mathematics Date EWE IOAC N HBSE POLYNOMIALS CHEBYSHEV AND FIBONACCI BETWEEN AEDM B-LAED OSR .YUSI EMN EL-SIS NERMINE YOUSSRI, H. YOUSSRI ABD-ELHAMEED, M. WALEED E YEGOERCCNETO FORMULAE CONNECTION HYPERGEOMETRIC NEW t pi 2015. April 4th : nerl novn rdcso ioac n hbse po Chebyshev and eval Fibonacci of we Moreover, products involving sequences. derivatives their and numbers r xrse ntrso eti auso yegoercf hypergeometric of values certain 2 kinds of second terms and in first expressed the are of polynomials Chebyshev and mials Abstract. F 1 osqety eoti oenwepesosfrteceleb the for expressions new some obtain we Consequently, . ioac oyoil;Fbncinmes hbse poly Chebyshev numbers; ; Fibonacci eetbihnwcneto omlebtenFbncipol Fibonacci between formulae connection new establish We N OAMDSADEK MOHAMMAD AND 1. Introduction 1 { F n ( x ) } sdfie yFbncilk re- Fibonacci-like by defined is 3D45 rwn neeto math- of interest growing ntoso h type the of unctions ,se[11,92]and [11–13,19–21] see s, x lynomials. aesm definite some uate sivligFibonacci involving es ubr arise. numbers e cso ubr.Yet, numbers. of nces swt lae idea clearer a with us hs formulae These . 1 = ra elo mathe- of deal great ae Fibonacci rated r a eobtained be can ers e egtt under- to get we ser ine h wide The cience. mue science, omputer hrfr,the Therefore, . atflbo of book eautiful yno- SI, nomi- 2 W. M. ABD-ELHAMEED,Y. H.YOUSSRI,N.EL-SISSI,AND M. SADEK

In order to study Fibonacci polynomials, one may consider linking Fibonacci polynomials to other well-studied polynomials, such as . Chebyshev polynomials of the first and second kinds, Tn(x) and Un(x) respectively, are subfamilies of the larger class of . They are of crucial importance from both the theoretical and practical points of view. The interested reader in these polynomials may consult [16].

Given two sets of polynomials Pi i 0 and Qj j 0, the so-called connection { } ≥ { } ≥ problem between these polynomials is to determine the coefficients Ai,j in the expression

i

Pi(x)= Ai,j Qj(x). j=0 X

The connection coefficients Ai,j play an important role in many problems in pure and applied mathematics and in mathematical physics. The problem of finding connection coefficients between two sets of has been inves- tigated by many authors, see for instance [3,6,7,10,15,17,18]. In fact, most of the formulae for the connection coefficients between orthogonal polynomials are given in terms of terminating hypergeometric series of various types. For example, the connection formula of Jacobi-Jacobi polynomials is given in terms of a terminating hypergeometric series of the type 3F2(1), see [7]. In this article, we solve the connection problem between Fibonacci polynomials and the orthogonal polynomials Tn(x) and Un(x). We exhibit the Chebyshev ex- pression form of Fibonacci polynomials Fn(x). In fact, the connection coefficients turn out to be terminating hypergeometric series of type 2F1(λ) where λ is either 4 or 1/4. Furthermore, we tackle the inverse connection coefficients problem. − − In other words, we express Tn(x) and Un(x) in terms of Fn(x). Again, the latter coefficients involve the terminating hypergeometric series 2F1(λ). Based on the new connection formulae that we derive, we display several iden- tities satisfied by Fibonacci numbers, and we evaluate some finite sums. More- over, we find relations between terminating hypergeometric series of type 2F1(λ) for certain values of λ and specific parameters. Also, some identities involving the derivatives sequences of Fibonacci numbers are given. Finally, we express weighted definite integrals of products of Fibonacci and Chebyshev polynomials, and products of Fibonacci polynomials as sums involving hypergeometric series. FIBONACCI AND CHEBYSHEV POLYNOMIALS 3

2. Some relevant properties of Fibonacci and Chebyshev polynomials

In this section, we recall the properties of Fibonacci and Chebyshev polynomials that we are going to use throughout the note.

2.1. Fibonacci polynomials. Fibonacci polynomials are generated via the fol- lowing

F (x)= x F (x)+ F (x), n 0, where F (x)=0, F (x)=1. n+2 n+1 n ≥ 0 1 The n-th Fibonacci can be described explicitly as follows

n n x + √x2 +4 x √x2 +4 Fn(x)= − − . n 2 2 √x +4  The latter expression has the following explicit power form representation

n−1 2 ⌊ ⌋ n j 1 n 2j 1 F (x) = − − x − − n j j=0 X   where z represents the largest integer less than or equal to z. Now one can ⌊ ⌋ define the n-th Fibonacci number as follows (1 + √5)n (1 √5)n Fn = Fn(1) = − − . 2n √5 The corresponding derivatives sequences of the Fibonacci numbers are denoted by (q) Fn . They are defined via

(q) q Fn = D Fn(x) x=1.

Some of the identities relating Fibonacci and Lucas numbers to complex values of Chebyshev polynomials of the first and second kinds are as follows, see [4,22],

1 i (1) F = U , n+1 in n 2   ( i)n (2) U ( 2 i)= − F . n − 2 3(n+1) There are several articles that study relations and identities satisfied by Fibonacci numbers and their derivatives sequences, see for example [5,12,14]. 4 W. M. ABD-ELHAMEED,Y. H.YOUSSRI,N.EL-SISSI,AND M. SADEK

2.2. Chebyshev polynomials of the first and second kinds. Chebyshev polynomials Tn(x) and Un(x) of the first and second kinds, respectively, are poly- nomials in x, which can be defined by (see, Mason and Handscomb [16]):

Tn(x) = cos(n θ), and sin(n + 1)θ U (x)= , n sin θ where x = cos θ. The polynomials T (x) and U (x) are orthogonal on ( 1, 1) with n n − respect to the weight functions 1 and √1 x2, that is √1 x2 − − 1 1 0, m = n, (3) Tn(x) Tm(x) dx = 6 2 π 1 √1 x ( cn, m = n, Z− − 2 and 1 0, m = n, √ 2 (4) 1 x Un(x) Um(x) dx = π 6 1 − m = n, Z− ( 2 where 2 n =0, cn = (1, n> 0.

The polynomials Tn(x) and Un(x) may be generated, respectively, by means of the two recurrence relations:

Tn(x)=2x Tn 1(x) Tn 2(x), n =2, 3,..., − − − with

T0(x)=1, T1(x)= x, and

Un(x)=2x Un 1(x) Un 2(x), n =2, 3,..., − − − with

U0(x)=1, U1(x)=2x. They also have the following explicit power forms:

n 2 r n ⌊ ⌋ ( 1) n r n 2 r T (x)= − − (2 x) − , n 2 n r r r=0 X −   and n 2 ⌊ ⌋ r n r n 2 r U (x)= ( 1) − (2 x) − , n − r r=0 X   FIBONACCI AND CHEBYSHEV POLYNOMIALS 5

The following special values are of important use later:

(5) Tn(1) = 1, Un(1) = n +1,

q 1 − (n i)(n + i) (6) DqT (1) = − , q 1, n 2 i +1 ≥ i=0 Y and q 1 − (n i)(n + i + 2) (7) DqU (1) = (n + 1) − , q 1. n 2 i +3 ≥ i=0 Y 3. New connection formulae between Chebyshev polynomials of the first and second kinds and Fibonacci polynomials

The following two theorems establish two new connection formulae between Fibonacci polynomials and Chebyshev polynomials of the first and second kinds. The formulae are given in terms of values of hypergeometric functions.

Theorem 3.1. For every j 1, the following connection formula holds: ≥ j 2 j 2m 1 ⌊ ⌋ m j m 2 − − m, j m Tj(x)= j ( 1) − 2F1 − − 4 Fj 2m+1(x). − j 2m j m  −  − m=0   j 2m +2 X − − −   Theorem 3.2. For every j 1, the following connection formula holds: ≥ j 2 j ⌊ ⌋ m+1 j j +2m 1 m, j + m 1 1 Uj(x)=2 ( 1) − − 2F1 − − − − Fj 2m+1(x). − m j m +1  4  − m=0   j X − −   We will prove Theorem 3.1. The proof of Theorem 3.2 is similar.

Proof: The connection coefficients are written using the following terminating hypergeometric series

m k m, j m ( m)k (j m)k ( 4) 2F1 − − 4 = − − − ,  −  (2 + j 2m)k k! 2+ j 2m k=0 − X −   Therefore it suffices to show that the following identity holds

j 2 m m 1+j+2k 2m ⌊ ⌋ ( 1) 2− − j (1 + j 2m)(j + k m 1)! Tj(x)= φj(x) := − − − − Fj 2m+1(x). k!(m k)!(1 + j + k 2m)!(m k)! − m=0 k X X=0 − − − 6 W. M. ABD-ELHAMEED,Y. H.YOUSSRI,N.EL-SISSI,AND M. SADEK

In other words, we want to prove that the function φj(x) satisfies the recurrence relation defining T (x). It is easy to see that φ (x)= x and φ (x)=2x2 1. We j 1 2 − now make use of the recurrence relation

x Fj(x)= Fj+1(x) Fj 1(x) − − satisfied by Fibonacci polynomials

j 2 m m j+2k 2m ⌊ ⌋ ( 1) 2 − j (1 + j 2m)(j + k m 1)! 2xφj(x) = − − − − Fj 2m+2(x) k!(m k)!(1+ j + k 2m)!(m k)! − m=0 k=0 − − − Xj X 2 m m+1 j+2k 2m ⌊ ⌋ ( 1) 2 − j (1 + j 2m)(j + k m 1)! + − − − − Fj 2m(x). k!(m k)!(1+ j + k 2m)!(m k)! − m=0 k X X=0 − − − Some algebraic manipulations will yield

j−1 2 m m 2+j+2k 2m ⌊ ⌋ ( 1) 2− − (j 1)(j 2m)(j + k m 2)! 2xφj(x) = − − − − − Fj 2m(x) k!(m k)!(j + k 2m)!(m k)! − m=0 k=0 − − − Xj+1 X 2 m m j+2k 2m ⌊ ⌋ ( 1) 2 − (j +1)(2+ j 2m)(j + k m)! + − − − Fj 2m+2(x) k!(m k)!(2 + j + k 2m)!(m k)! − m=0 k X X=0 − − − = φj 1(x)+ φj+1(x), − Since Chebyshev polynomials T (x), j 1, are uniquely determined by the recur- j ≥ rence relation

2 2 x Tj(x)= Tj 1(x)+ Tj+1(x), T1 = x, T2(x)=2 x 1, − − it follows that φ (x) is the j-th Chebyshev polynomial T (x) for j 1. This j j ≥ completes the proof of Theorem 3.1. ✷

4. Inversion formulae between Fibonacci and Chebyshev polynomials of the first and second kinds

In this section we are concerned with deriving the inversion formulae to those given in the previous section. We will express Fibonacci and Lucas polynomials in terms of Chebyshev polynomials. Again the connection coefficients turn out to be expressions involving values of hypergeometric functions of the type 2F1. We will need the following lemma in order to proceed. FIBONACCI AND CHEBYSHEV POLYNOMIALS 7

m, j + m 1 Lemma 4.1. We set d = F − − − 4 . The following recur- j,m 2 1  −  j − rence relation holds  

j 2 j 1 4 − (j 2m +1) (j m + 1) dj 2,m 1 + − (j 2m +2) (j m) dj 1,m 1 m 1 − − − − m 1 − − − −  −   −  j 1 j + − (j 2m) (j m + 1)dj 1,m (j m) (j 2m + 1) dj,m =0. m − − − − m − −     Proof: Let j e = (j 2m + 1) d . j,m m − j,m   In order to prove that the recurrence relation above is satisfied, it suffices to show that

4(j m + 1) ej 2,m 1 +(j m) ej 1,m 1 +(j m + 1) ej 1,m =(j m) ej,m. − − − − − − − − − Now, ej,m, can be written in the form m k j ( m)k (m j 1)k ( 4) ej,m = (j 2m + 1) − − − − . m − ( j)k k! k   X=0 − Using the identity ( 1)k m! ( m) = − , − k (m k)! − ej,m can be written equivalently as m (j k)!4k e =(j m + 1)(j 2m + 1) − . j,m − − k!(m k)!(j k m + 1)! k X=0 − − − It follows that

4(j m + 1) ej ,m + (j m) ej ,m + (j m + 1) ej ,m = − −2 −1 − −1 −1 − −1 m−1 m (j k)! 4k (j k 1)!4k (j m) 4(1 + j 2m) − + (j 2m) − − − 2 − k! (m k)! (j k m)! − k! (m k)! (j k m)! k k  X=0 − − − X=0 − − − m−1 (j k 1)!4k +(2 + j 2m) − − . − k! (m k 1)! (j k m + 1)! k X=0 − − − −  Taking a common denominator yields the following simplification

4(j m + 1) ej 2,m 1 +(j m) ej 1,m 1 +(j m + 1) ej 1,m = − − − − − − m− − (j k)! (j m) (1 + j 2m) − = (j m) e . − 2 − k!(m k 1)!(j k m + 1)! − j,m k X=0 − − − − Lemma 4.1 is now proved. ✷ 8 W. M. ABD-ELHAMEED,Y. H.YOUSSRI,N.EL-SISSI,AND M. SADEK

In the following two theorems, we exhibit the connection relation between Fi- bonacci polynomials and Chebyshev polynomials of the first and second kinds. Theorem 4.2. For every nonnegative integer j, the following connection formula holds j 2 ⌊ ⌋ 1 j m j+2m+1 m, j m +1 1 Fj+1(x)= − 2− 2F1 − − − Tj 2m(x), cj 2m j 2m  j 2m +1 4  − m=0 −   X − −   where 2 j =0, cj = (1, j> 0. Theorem 4.3. For every nonnegative integer j, the following connection formula holds j 1 ⌊ 2 ⌋ j (j 2m + 1) m, j + m 1 Fj+1(x)= − 2F1 − − − 4 Uj 2m(x). 2j m j m +1  −  − m=0   j X − −   The proofs of Theorems 4.2 and 4.3 are similar, so it suffices to prove Theorem

4.3. Proof: We will proceed by induction. Assume that the above identity is valid for any k j. We know that ≤ Fj+1(x)= x Fj(x)+ Fj 1(x), − therefore using the induction hypothesis to write Fj 1(x) and Fj(x) in terms of − Chebyshev polynomials, together with making use of the recurrence relation 1 x Uj(x)= [Uj 1(x)+ Uj+1(x)] , 2 − yield

j−1 1 ⌊ 2 ⌋ j 1 j 2m m, j + m Fj (x) = − − F − − 4 Uj m (x)+ Uj m(x) +1 2j m j m 2 1  −  −2 −2 −2 m=0   1 j X − −  j −1   2 1 ⌊ ⌋ j 2m 1 j 2 m, j + m +1 + − − − F − − 4 Uj m (x). 2j−2 j m 1 m 2 1  −  −2 −2 m=0   2 j X − − −   In fact the latter identity can be simplified and rewritten as follows

j−1 ⌊ 2 ⌋ 1 Fj+1(x)= gj,mUj 2m(x)+ gj 1,µj Uj 2 µj 2(x)+ gj 2,νj 1 Uj 2νj (x) θj, − 2 − − − − − − m=0 X FIBONACCI AND CHEBYSHEV POLYNOMIALS 9 where

1 j 1 (j 2m + 2) 1 m, j + m 1 gj,m = − − F − − − 4 + 2j  m 1 j m +1 2 1  −    1 j  − − −    j 2 (j 2m + 1) 1 m,m j 4 − − F − − 4 + m 1 j m 2 1  −    2 j − − −   j 1 (j 2m) m,m j − − F − − 4 , m j m 2 1  −    1 j − −   

and  j 1 j 1, if j even, µj = − , νj = , θj = 2 2  0, if j odd.      Making use of Lemma 4.1 together with some manipulations imply that gj,m can be reduced to take the form

j (j 2m + 1) m, 1+ m j g = m − F − − − 4 . j,m 2j(j m + 1) 2 1  −   j − −  

This yields that j 2 j 1 ⌊ ⌋ m (j 2m + 1) m, j + m 1 Fj+1(x)= − 2F1 − − − 4 Uj 2m(x), 2j j m +1  −  − m=0  j X − −   ✷ which completes the proof of Theorem 4.3.

5. Some applications In this section, we introduce three applications to the new derived connection formulae and their inversion ones: (i) We display some new expressions involving Fibonacci and Lucas numbers. (ii) Some new expressions for the derivatives se- quences of Fibonacci numbers are given. (iii) We evaluate some definite integrals involving certain products of Fibonacci and Chebyshev polynomials.

5.1. New expressions involving Fibonacci and Lucas numbers. In this sec- tion we use the results we developed in §3 and §4 to evaluate finite sums involving certain values of hypergeometric functions and Fibonacci numbers. 10 W. M. ABD-ELHAMEED, Y. H. YOUSSRI,N. EL-SISSI,AND M. SADEK

Corollary 5.1. For every nonnegative integer j, the following two identities hold:

j 2 j 2m 1 ⌊ ⌋ m j m 2 − − m, j m ( 1) − 2F1 − − 4 Fj 2m+1 =1, − j 2m j m  −  − m=0   j 2m +2 X − − −   and

j 2 j ⌊ ⌋ m+1 j ( j +2m 1) m, j + m 1 1 2 ( 1) − − 2F1 − − − − Fj 2m+1 = j +1. − m j m +1  4  − m=0   j X − −   Corollary 5.2. For every nonnegative integer j, the following two expressions for

Fibonacci numbers are valid

j 2 ⌊ ⌋ 1 j m j+2m+1 m, j m +1 1 Fj+1 = − 2− 2F1 − − − , cj 2m j 2m  j 2m +1 4  m=0 −   X − −  

j 1 ⌊ 2 ⌋ j (j 2m + 1)2 m, j + m 1 F = − F − − − 4 . j+1 2j m j m +1 2 1  −  m=0   j X − −   Proof: The proof of Corollaries 5.1 and 5.2 are immediately obtaine d from The- orems 3.1, 3.2, 4.2 and 4.3, respectively, by setting x =1. ✷ The fact that Fibonacci numbers themselves can be expressed as values of ter- minating hypergeometric series can be exploited in order to find a linear relation between hypergeometric series of type 2F1 with different parameters at a specific value. The n-th Fibonacci number can be written as a hypergeometric series itself. In fact one knows that

1 n 2 n 1 n 2 n n −2 , −2 −2 , −2 Fn = 2F1 5 = 2F1 4 , n 1 3 2 −    −  2 1 n −     see [5] for example. One of the linear transformations of hypergeometric series is given by the following identity

a, b a a, c b z F z = (1 z)− F − . 2 1   − 2 1  z 1 c c −     Putting these together, one can rewrite Corollary 5.2 as fol lows.

FIBONACCI AND CHEBYSHEV POLYNOMIALS 11

Corollary 5.3. For every nonnegative integer j, the following two expressions identities hold true

j j 1 j 2 −2 , −2 ⌊ ⌋ 1 j m j+2m+1 m, j m +1 1 2F1 4 = − 2− 2F1 − − −  j −  cj 2m j 2m  j 2m +1 4  m=0 −   − X − −   j   2 1 ⌊ ⌋ j (j 2m + 1)2 m, j + m 1 = − F − − − 4 , 2j m j m +1 2 1  −  m=0   j X − − j   j 1 j 2 m −2 , −2 2 ⌊ ⌋ 5 j m m, m 1 2F1 5 = − 2F1 − − ,  3  j +1 cj 2m j 2m  j 2m +1 5 2 m=0 −   X − −   j   2 1 ⌊ ⌋ j (j 2m + 1)2 m, 1 m 4 = 5m − F − − . 2j m j m +1 2 1  5 m=0   j X − −   Furthermore, one may obtain similar identities to the ones above relating values of the hypergeometric series 2F1 evaluated at 1/5 or 4/5 and several other values, see §4 in [5], using different linear transformations. Now, and based on the identities (1) and (2), along with the connection formulae obtained in §4, the following identities follow. Corollary 5.4. For every nonnegative integer j, and i2 = 1, the following iden- tities hold: −

j 2 m+1 j i j j ( 1) m ( j +2m 1)Fj−2m+1 2 m, j + m 1 1 i Fj = 2 − − − F − − − − , +1 j m +1 2 1  4  m=0   j X − − j   2 m+1 j j j+1 ( 1) m ( j +2m 1) Fj−2m+1( 2i) m, j + m 1 1 ( i) F j = 2 − − − − F − − − − . − 3 +3 j m +1 2 1  4  m=0  j X − −  

One may also obtain some new trigonometric identities making use of the fact that Tn(cos θ) = cos(nθ). In fact one has

j 2 ⌊ ⌋ 1 j m j+2m+1 m, j m +1 1 Fj+1(cos θ)= − 2− 2F1 − − − cos((j 2m)θ) , cj 2m j 2m  j 2m +1 4  − m=0 −   X − −   where

2 j =0, cj = . (1, j> 0. 12 W. M. ABD-ELHAMEED, Y. H. YOUSSRI,N. EL-SISSI,AND M. SADEK

x + x 1 xn + x n Another interesting identity is obtained by observing that T − = − , n 2 2 whence   j −1 2 x + x ⌊ ⌋ 1 j m −j+2m m, j m +1 1 j−2m 2m−j Fj+1 = − 2 2F1 − − − x + x . 2 cj m j 2m  4    m=0 −2   j 2m +1 X − −   

5.2. New derivatives sequences identities. Based on the connection formulae introduced in Theorems 3.1, 3.2, 4.2, and 4.3, we may obtain new formulae for the derivatives sequences of Fibonacci numbers by using the identities (6) and (7). Corollary 5.5. For all q 1, the following two formulae are valid ≥ j 2 j 2m 1 ⌊ ⌋ m j m 2 − − m, j m (q) ( 1) − 2F1 − − 4 Fj 2m+1 = − j 2m j m  −  − m=0   j 2m +2 X − − − q+1 ( 1) √π j (1 j)q 1(j+ 1)q 1  − − , − q − 1 2 Γ q + 2 and  j 2 ⌊ ⌋ m+1 j ( j +2m 1) m, j + m 1 1 (q) ( 1) − − 2F1 − − − − Fj 2m+1 = − m j m +1  4  − m=0   j X − − q+1 ( 1) √π (j)3 (1 j)q 1(j + 3)q 1  − − . − j+q+1 − 3 2 Γ q + 2 Corollary 5.6. For all q 1, the following two formulae are valid ≥ j q+1 2 (q) ( 1) √π ⌊ ⌋ 1 j m j+2m q+1 2 Fj+1 = − 1 − 2− − (j 2m) (j 2m + 1)q 1 cj m j 2m − − − × Γ q + 2 m=0 2 X −  −   m, j m +1 1 ( j +2m + 1)q 1 2F1 − − − , − −  4  j 2m +1 −   and j ( 1)q+1 √π ⌊ 2 ⌋ j (j 2m)(j 2m + 1)2 (j 2m + 2) F (q) = − − − − j+1 j+q+1 3 m j m +1 × 2 Γ q + 2 m=0 X   −  m, j + m 1 (j 2m + 3)q 1 2F1 − − − 4 . − −  −  j −  

FIBONACCI AND CHEBYSHEV POLYNOMIALS 13

Proof: In order to prove Corollaries 5.5 and 5.6, one needs to differentiate the connection formulae in Theorems 3.1, 3.2, 4.2, and 4.3, then one sets x =1. Now the identities follow from (6) and (7). ✷

5.3. Some integrals formulae involving Chebyshev and Fibonacci poly- nomials. The following two integrals formulae are direct consequences of Theo- rems 4.2 and 4.3.

Corollary 5.7. For all j k, the following two integrals formulae hold: ≥ j+k k−j 1 1 π 2 , (j + k + 2) ( k ) 2 2 −1 Fj+1(x)Tk(x) 2k c 2F1 4 , if (k + j) even, dx =  k k +1 ! √1 x2 Z  −1 − 0, otherwise,

 and 

j k−j −1 1 π ( j−k ) (k+1) , (j + k + 2) 2 2 2 j 2F1 4 , if (k + j) even, 2 2 (j+k+2) 1 x Fj+1(x) Uk(x) dx =  j − ! − − Z  −1 p 0, otherwise.

 Now one can find an explicit description for weighted definite integrals of prod- ucts of Fibonacci polynomials in terms of hypergeometric series.

Corollary 5.8. For all j k, the following two integrals formulae hold: ≥ 1 F (x)F (x) j+1 k+1 dx = √1 x2 −Z1 − ⌊ k ⌋ j−m k−m π 2 m, k m +1 1 m, j m +1 1 4md j−2m k−2m F − − F − − k+j−1 2 m 2 1 − 2 1 − 2 ck mcj m  4  ×  4  m=0 −2  −2  k 2m +1 j 2m +1 X − −    

and

1 2 1 x Fj (x)Fk (x) dx = − +1 +1 −Z1 p ⌊ k ⌋ π 2 j k (k 2m + 1)(j 2m + 1) m, k + m 1 − − F − − − 4 2k+j+1 m m (k m + 1)(j m + 1) 2 1  −  m=0    k X − − −   m, j + m 1 F − − − 4 . × 2 1  −  j −  

14 W. M. ABD-ELHAMEED, Y. H. YOUSSRI,N. EL-SISSI,AND M. SADEK References

[1] W.M. Abd-Elhameed. New product and linearization formulae of Jacobi polynomials of certain parameters. Integr. Transf. Spec. F., DOI:10.1080/10652469.2015.1029924. [2] W.M. Abd-Elhameed, E.H. Doha, and H.M. Ahmed. Linearization formulae for certain Jacobi polynomials. Ramanujan J., DOI: 10.1007/s11139-014-9668-2. [3] I. Area, E. Godoy, A. Ronveaux, and A. Zarzo. Solving connection and linearization prob- lems within the askey scheme and its q analogue via inversion formulas. J. Comput. Appl. − Math., 133(1):151–162, 2001. [4] S.B. Bozkurt, F. Yılmaz, and D. Bozkurt. On the complex factorization of the Lucas se- quence. Appl. Math. Lett., 24(8):1317–1321, 2011. [5] K. Dilcher and L. Pisano. Hypergeometric functions and Fibonacci numbers. Fibonacci Quarterly, 38(4):342–362, 2000. [6] E.H. Doha. On the connection coefficients and recurrence relations arising from expansions in series of Laguerre polynomials. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 36(20):5449–5462, 2003. [7] E.H. Doha. On the construction of recurrence relations for the expansion and connection coefficients in series of Jacobi polynomials. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 37(3):657, 2004. [8] E.H. Doha and W.M. Abd-Elhameed. New linearization formulae for the products of Chebyshev polynomials of third and fourth kind. Rocky Mt. J. Math., To appear. [9] EH Doha and WM Abd-Elhameed. Integrals of Chebyshev polynomials of third and fourth kinds: An application to solution of boundary value problems with polynomial coefficients. J. Contemp. Math. Anal., 49(6):296–308, 2014. [10] E.H. Doha and H.M. Ahmed. Recurrences and explicit formulae for the expansion and connection coefficients in series of Bessel polynomials. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 37(33):8045, 2004. [11] M. El-Mikkawy and T. Sogabe. A new family of k Fibonacci numbers. Appl. Math. Com- − put., 215(12):4456–4461, 2010. [12] S. Falcon and A. Plaza. On the Fibonacci k numbers. Chaos Soliton Fract., 32(5):1615– − 1624, 2007. [13] H.H. Gulec, N. Taskara, and K. Uslu. A new approach to generalized Fibonacci and Lucas numbers with binomial coefficients. Appl. Math. Comput., 220:482–486, 2013. [14] T. Koshy. Fibonacci and Lucas numbers with applications, volume 51. John Wiley & Sons, 2011. [15] P. Maroni and Z. da Rocha. Connection coefficients between orthogonal polynomials and the canonical sequence: an approach based on symbolic computation. Numer. Algor., 47(3):291– 314, 2008. [16] J.C. Mason and D.C. Handscomb. Chebyshev polynomials. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY, CRC, Boca Raton, 2010. [17] J. Sánchez-Ruiz and J.S. Dehesa. Some connection and linearization problems for polyno- mials in and beyond the askey scheme. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 133(1):579–591, 2001. [18] R. Szwarc. Linearization and connection coefficients of orthogonal polynomials. Mh. Math., 113(4):319–329, 1992. [19] N. Taskara, K. Uslu, and H.H. Gulec. On the properties of Lucas numbers with binomial coefficients. Appl. Math. Lett., 23(1):68–72, 2010. FIBONACCI AND CHEBYSHEV POLYNOMIALS 15

[20] A. Włoch. Some identities for the generalized Fibonacci numbers and the generalized Lucas numbers. Appl. Math. Comput., 219(10):5564–5568, 2013. [21] Yasin Y. Yazlik and N. Taskara. A note on generalized-Horadam sequence. Comput. Math. Appl., 63(1):36–41, 2012. [22] W. Zhang. On Chebyshev polynomials and Fibonacci numbers. Fibonacci Quart., 40(5):424– 428, 2002.

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt

E-mail address: walee−[email protected]

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt E-mail address: [email protected]

American University in Cairo, Mathematics and Actuarial Science Department, AUC Avenue, New Cairo, Egypt E-mail address: [email protected]

American University in Cairo, Mathematics and Actuarial Science Department, AUC Avenue, New Cairo, Egypt E-mail address: [email protected]