Winter Diet of the Barn Owl &Lpar;<I>Tyto Alba</I>&Rpar; and Long&Hyphen;Eared Owl &Lpar;<I>As

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Winter Diet of the Barn Owl &Lpar;<I>Tyto Alba</I>&Rpar; and Long&Hyphen;Eared Owl &Lpar;<I>As SHORT COMMUNICATIONS j. RaptorRes. 33(2):160-163 ¸ 1999 The Raptor ResearchFoundation, Inc. WINTER DtET OF THE B•'4 OWL (Trro AœBA)•'qD LONG-FA_•D OWL (As•o OTUS)IN NORTHEASTERN GREECE: A COMPARISON HARALAMBOS ALMZATOS 1 Zalihi 4, GR-11524Athens, Greece VASSILIS GOUTNER Departmentof Zoology,Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki,GR-54006 Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece K•¾ Worn)s: Barn Owl; Tyto alba; Long-earedOwl; Asio species,we calculatedevenness (E)(Ns, • = (N s - 1)/(N• otus; diet;,Greece. - 1), where N• = expH' and N s = 1/52p?)(Alatalo 1981, Marks 1984). In order to compare the dietary overlap There have been severalcomparative studies of the di- between speciesin each wetland, we used Pianka'sIndex (1973), multiplied by 100 to expressit as a percentage. ets of Barn (Tyt0 alba) and Long-eared (Asiootus) Owls (Marti 1974, Amat and Soriguer 1981, Mikkola 1983, De- RESULTS libes et al. 1983, Marks and Marti 1984, Cramp 1985, Capizzi and Luiselli 1996). Dietary information hasbeen The diets of both owls contained small mammals, useful in documentingthe trophic relationshipsin the birds, and insects,in descending order of importance areaswhere the two speciesare sympatric(Herrera and (Table 1). Smallmammals made up 92% of the Barn Owl Htraldo 1976, Marks and Marti 1984). Greece is within diet by number and 85% by biomass.At least 10 mammal the breeding and wintering areasof these species.Infor- specieswere eaten. The most important of them were mation on the diet of Barn Owl in Greece has come Mus spp. (40% by number and 32% by biomass),Microtus mainly from islands and parts of central and western epiroticus(20% and 28%), Apodemusspp. (7% and 10%), Greece(B6hr 1962,Cheylan 1976, Pieper 1977, Nietham- and Crocidurasuaveolens (19% and 8%). Birds of at least ruer 1989, Tsounis and Dimitropoulos 1992). Only a sin- five speciesformed 6% of the diet by number and 15% gle studyhas provided information on the diet of these by biomass.Insects (orthopterans) were a minor diet con- two specieson Euboea Island (Akriotis 1981). This study stituent (2% by number and lessthan 1% by biomass). colnparesthe winter diet of the Barn Owl and the Long- The averageprey weight was 14.7 g (range 0.5-70 g) eared Owl in a Greek wetland area. Prey diversitywas 5.19 and evenness0.67. Mammals made up 89% of the diet by number and STUDY AREA AND METHODS 85% by biomassof Long-eared Owls. We identified at Our studywas conducted in northeastern Greece near least 12 mammalian species in the diet but the main Porto Lagos(40ø99'N, 25ø32'E) in an areawith an exten- mammalian prey were Mus spp. (48% by number and sive coastal wetland complex including lagoons, salt- 35% by biomass),Apodemus spp. (23% and 28%), and M. marshes,mudflats, reedbeds,open cultivatedand uncul- epiroticus(13% and 15%). Birds (at least 16 species) tivated land, small villages, and pinewood plantations. formed 11% of the diet by number and 15% by biomass, Pelletsof Long-earedOwls were collectedat a large com- munal, winter roost in a pinewood and those of Barn while insects(orthopteran, Tettigoniidae) were lessthan Owls were collected in neighboring ruined buildings in 1% by both number and biomass. The average prey February and early March of 1987. Prey were identified weight was16.5 g (range 2-80 g). Prey diversityand even- accordingto Brown et al. (1987), Chaline (1974), and hessvalues were 4.29 and 0.56, respectively,both being MacDonald and Barrett (1993). Mean prey weightswere lower than these of the Barn Owl. taken mainly from Perrins (1987) for birds, MacDonald The proportions of all mammalian prey, in terms of and Barrett (1993) for mammals and fi•om our own data number and biomass,were very similar in both owl spe- for insects. cies. Nevertheless,the proportions of the four most im- We estimated the trophic diversityof birds and mam- portant genera ( Mus, Apodemus,Microtits, and Crocidura) mals in the owl diets at the generic level and that of insectsat a classlevel using the antilog of the Shannon differed significantly(Xs = 208.83, df = 3, P < 0.0001) Index (NB = expH; whereH' -- -•p•lnp, wherep• rep- Crocidura were much more abundant in the Barn Owl's resentsthe proportion of prey items of each genusin the diet while Apodemuswas more common in the Long-eared sample. To standardizediversity for comparisonbetween Owl's diet. Although fewer birds were taken by the Barn 160 JUNE1999 SHORTCOMMUNICATIONS 161 Table 1. Diet of Barn and Long-eared Owls in Porto Lagos. BARN OWL LONG-EARED OWL PREY NUMBER % NUMBER % BIOMASS NUMBER % NUMBER % BIOMASS Insects 7 2.3 0.2 2 0.2 0.1 Tettigoniidae 1 0.3 0.1 2 0.2 0.1 Gryllidae 6 1.9 0.1 -- -- -- Birds 18 5.8 14.7 102 10.6 15.5 Alcedo atthis -- -- -- I O.1 0.3 Lullula arborea -- -- -- 2 0.2 0.4 Alauda arvensis -- -- -- 1 0.1 0.2 Galerida cristata -- -- -- 9 0.9 1.8 Phylloscopusspp. -- -- -- 3 0.3 0.2 Erithacus rubecula -- -- -- 4 0.4 0.5 Turdusspp. -- -- -- 3 0.3 1.5 Aegithaloscaudatus -- -- -- 6 0.6 0.3 Parus caeruleus 1 0.3 0.2 2 0.2 0.1 Parusspp. -- -- -- 4 0.4 0.3 Sturnusvulgaris 3 1.0 4.6 2 0.2 0.9 E,mberizaspp. I 0.3 0.5 2 0.2 0.3 Miliaria calandra 5 1.6 4.4 -- -- -- Fringillacoelebs -- -- -- 11 1.1 1.4 Carduelis chloris -- -- -- 3 0.3 0.6 Carduelisspp. -- -- -- 2 0.2 0.2 Serinus serinus -- -- -- 3 0.3 0.2 Passerspp. 3 1.0 1.6 10 1 1.6 Unident. 5 1.6 3.3 34 3.5 4.3 Mammals 286 92.0 85.1 857 89.2 84.5 Croddura leucodon 6 1.9 1.1 3 0.3 0.2 Crocidura suaveolens 60 19.3 7.9 3 0.3 0.1 Suncus etruscus 2 0.6 O.1 1 O.1 < O.1 Talpaeuropaea -- -- -- 2 0.2 0.9 Rhinolophusferrumequinum -- -- -- I O.1 O.1 Myotissp. -- -- -- 1 0.1 0.1 Pipistrellussp. 1 0.3 0.1 -- -- -- Tadarida teniotis -- -- -- 1 0.1 0.2 Microtusepiroticus 63 20.3 27.6 121 12.6 15.2 Arvicola terrestris I 0.3 1.3 -- -- -- Micromysminutus 2 0.6 0.2 -- -- -- Apodemusspp. 23 7.4 10.1 219 22.8 27.6 Rattus rattus 3 1.0 3.9 -- -- -- Rattusnorvegicus -- -- -- 1 0.1 0.4 Rattusspp. -- -- -- 1 0.1 0.4 Musspp. 125 40.2 31.6 464 48.3 35.1 Unident. Muridae -- -- -- 33 3.4 3.1 Unident. Rodentia -- -- -- 6 0.6 1.1 Total 311 100 100 961 100 100 Owl, some larger-sizedspecies (Sturnus, Miliaria) were DISCUSSION proportionallymore common, so bird biomasswas simi- We found small mammals to be the most important lar in the diet of both owls. Average prey weights were prey of both Barn and Long-earedOwls in northeastern similar.Both the total prey overlapand mammalianprey Greece. In other Greek areas, Barn Owls have also been overlapof the two owl specieswere 86%. reported to prey mainly on small mammals (4-15 spe- 162 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS VOL. 33, NO. 2 cles), mice (Mus or Apodemus)being the most important related to this prey's local availability (Bunn et al. 1982, prey by number and usually also by biomass (Akriotis Mikkola 1983). 1981, B6hr 1962, Cheylan 1976, Tsounisand Dimitro- The averageprey weight of the Barn Owl in Porto La- poulos 1992). On some islandssuch as Crete and Corfu, gos was within the limits of the European populations a diverse spectrum of bat specieswas taken but in low (range = 12.8-25 g, Taylor 1994). That of the Long- overall proportions(B6hr 1962, Pieper 1977). In com- eared Owl was much lower than that of the rest of Eu- parison to the Barn Owl's diet in Euboea (Akriotis 1981), rope (37.4 g, Marti 1976), where Microtusspp. (average we found higher biomassproportions of birds (15% vs. weight range = 30-35 g) make up a larger percentageof 3%) and C. suaveolens(8% vs. 1%) but similar propor- the diet (41.5%vs. 12.6%in our study).The lighterprey nons of Apodemus(10% vs. 11%). In contrast,the diet of weight in our studywas primarily due to the preponder- the Long-earedOwls we studied had higher proportions ance of Mus spp. in the diet which weighed only 12 g. of birds (32% vs. 15% by biomass)and Apodemus(34% Average prey weight in the U.S. is even higher than that vs 28%) but those of C. suaveolenswerelow (both <1%). in Europe for both speciesreflecting the availabilityof In Euboea, Long-eared Owls preyed upon somemammal larger-sizedprey species(Taylor 1994). The higher aver- speciesnot found in our study.While owlsprobably differ age prey weight of Barn Owlsin the U.S. may alsosimply in terms of the speciesof mammals they eat in various be due to its larger size than its European relative (Marti habitats (Akriotis 1981, MEHPW 1986), they seemto con- 1974, Marks and Marti 1984, Mikkola 1983). s•stently use mammals as their most common prey Dietary overlap of the two speciesvaried greatly in six source. studiesin the U.S. ranging from 56-90% (Marks and In Europe and the Canary Islands, both owl species Marti 1984). In Spain, overlapwas much higher in winter are alsomainly mammal predators. As in Greece,in some (89%, Delibes et al. 1983) than in summer (69%, Delibes areas the Long-eared Owl's diet can become heavilyre- et al. 1983; 78%, Amat and Soriguer1981). The trophic hant on birds (Mikkola 1983, Amat and Soriguer 1981, diversity(H') of Barn Owlsin our area was0.32 and even- Delgado et al.
Recommended publications
  • New Pseudophyllinae from the Lesser Antilles (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Tettigoniidae)
    Zootaxa 3741 (2): 279–288 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3741.2.6 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:156FF18E-0C3F-468C-A5BE-853CAA63C00F New Pseudophyllinae from the Lesser Antilles (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Tettigoniidae) SYLVAIN HUGEL1 & LAURE DESUTTER-GRANDCOLAS2 1INCI, UPR 3212 CNRS, Université de Strasbourg; 21, rue René Descartes; F-67084 Strasbourg Cedex. E-mail: [email protected] 2Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département systématique et évolution, UMR 7205 CNRS, Case postale 50 (Entomologie), 57 rue Cuvier, F-75231 Paris cedex 05, France. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Two new Cocconitini Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1895 species belonging to Nesonotus Beier, 1960 are described from the Lesser Antilles: Nesonotus caeruloglobus Hugel, n. sp. from Dominica, and Nesonotus vulneratus Hugel, n. sp. from Martinique. The songs of both species are described and elements of biology are given. The taxonomic status of species close to Nesonotus tricornis (Thunberg, 1815) is discussed. Key words: Orthoptera, Pseudophyllinae, Caribbean, Leeward Islands, Windward islands, Dominica, Martinique Résumé Deux nouvelles sauterelles Cocconotini Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1895 appartenant au genre Nesonotus Beier, 1960 sont décrites des Petites Antilles : Nesonotus caeruloglobus Hugel, n. sp. de Dominique, et Nesonotus vulneratus Hugel, n. sp. de Martinique. Le chant des deux espèces est décrit et des éléments de biologie sont donnés. Le statut taxonomique des espèces proches de Nesonotus tricornis (Thunberg, 1815) est discuté. Introduction Cocconotini species occur in most of the Lesser Antilles islands, including small and dry ones such as Terre de Haut in Les Saintes micro archipelago (S.
    [Show full text]
  • Katydid (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) Bio-Ecology in Western Cape Vineyards
    Katydid (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) bio-ecology in Western Cape vineyards by Marcé Doubell Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Agricultural Sciences at Stellenbosch University Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Faculty of AgriSciences Supervisor: Dr P. Addison Co-supervisors: Dr C. S. Bazelet and Prof J. S. Terblanche December 2017 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: December 2017 Copyright © 2017 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Summary Many orthopterans are associated with large scale destruction of crops, rangeland and pastures. Plangia graminea (Serville) (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) is considered a minor sporadic pest in vineyards of the Western Cape Province, South Africa, and was the focus of this study. In the past few seasons (since 2012) P. graminea appeared to have caused a substantial amount of damage leading to great concern among the wine farmers of the Western Cape Province. Very little was known about the biology and ecology of this species, and no monitoring method was available for this pest. The overall aim of the present study was, therefore, to investigate the biology and ecology of P. graminea in vineyards of the Western Cape to contribute knowledge towards the formulation of a sustainable integrated pest management program, as well as to establish an appropriate monitoring system.
    [Show full text]
  • Barn Owl (Tyto Alba) Predation on Small Mammals and Its Role in the Control of Hantavirus Natural Reservoirs in a Periurban Area in Southeastern Brazil Magrini, L
    Barn owl (Tyto alba) predation on small mammals and its role in the control of hantavirus natural reservoirs in a periurban area in southeastern Brazil Magrini, L. and Facure, KG.* Laboratório de Taxonomia, Ecologia Comportamental e Sistemática de Anuros Neotropicais, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia – UFU, Rua Ceará, s/n, bloco 2d, sala 22b, CP 593, CEP 38400-902, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil *e-mail: [email protected] Received September 25, 2006 – Accepted April 27, 2007 – Distributed November 30, 2008 (With 1 figure) Abstract The aim of this study was to inventory the species of small mammals in Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil, based on regurgitated pellets of the barn owl and to compare the frequency of rodent species in the diet and in the environment. Since in the region there is a high incidence of hantavirus infection, we also evaluate the importance of the barn owl in the control of rodents that transmit the hantavirus. Data on richness and relative abundance of rodents in the mu- nicipality were provided by the Centro de Controle de Zoonoses, from three half-yearly samplings with live traps. In total, 736 food items were found from the analysis of 214 pellets and fragments. Mammals corresponded to 86.0% of food items and were represented by one species of marsupial (Gracilinanus agilis) and seven species of rodents, with Calomys tener (70.9%) and Necromys lasiurus (6.7%) being the most frequent. The proportion of rodent species in barn owl pellets differed from that observed in trap samplings, with Calomys expulsus, C. tener and Oligoryzomys nigripes being consumed more frequently than expected.
    [Show full text]
  • Population, Ecology and Morphology of Saga Pedo (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) at the Northern Limit of Its Distribution
    Eur. J. Entomol. 104: 73–79, 2007 http://www.eje.cz/scripts/viewabstract.php?abstract=1200 ISSN 1210-5759 Population, ecology and morphology of Saga pedo (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) at the northern limit of its distribution ANTON KRIŠTÍN and PETER KAĕUCH Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Štúrova 2, 960 53 Zvolen, Slovakia; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Tettigoniidae, survival strategies, endangered species, large insect predators, ecological limits Abstract. The bush-cricket Saga pedo, one of the largest predatory insects, has a scattered distribution across 20 countries in Europe. At the northern boundary of its distribution, this species is most commonly found in Slovakia and Hungary. In Slovakia in 2003–2006, 36 known and potentially favourable localities were visited and at seven this species was recorded for the first time. This species has been found in Slovakia in xerothermic forest steppes and limestone grikes (98% of localities) and on slopes (10–45°) with south-westerly or westerly aspects (90%) at altitudes of 220–585 m a.s.l. (mean 433 m, n = 20 localities). Most individuals (66%) were found in grass-herb layers 10–30 cm high and almost 87% within 10 m of a forest edge (oak, beech and hornbeam being prevalent). The maximum density was 12 nymphs (3rd–5th instar) / 1000 m2 (July 4, 510 m a.s.l.). In a comparison of five present and previous S. pedo localities, 43 species of Orthoptera were found in the present and 37 in previous localities. The mean numbers and relative abundance of species in present S.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Book 2020 for Website Ipages
    BY ELIZABETH MONROE WITH JIM HYATT 2011 2011-20202014 The Birds of Capay Valley As featured in the Journals for The Greater Capay Va!ey Historical Society 20112011-2014-2020 RESEARCH, PHOTOGRAPHS AND WRITING BY ELIZABETH MONROE AND JIM HIATT -- 5th generation pioneer descendants of Capay Valley-Hungry Hollow 1- Cover The Birds of Capay Valley Table of Contents Taken from the Journals & Newsletters of The Greater Capay Valley Historical Society - 2011-2020 Below: Canada Geese on Cache Creek 2014 by Jim Hiatt I wish to thank Jim Hiatt for his wonderful support in my efforts to research and write about the greater Capay Valley from 2011 through 2020. In the course of doing this work, I discovered that Jim was a “hobby ornithologist” and asked him to contribute more pictures, information and personal stories or his 60-plus years watching the birds Page 1-2 = Black Birds of this area—and what a treasure I Page 3 = Blue & Scrub Jays was given! This book is a Page 4-6 = Blue Birds + Finch and Meadowlark compilation of all the articles Page 7 = Curlews to Cranes included in the series of Journals I Page 8-9 = Mallards created for The Greater Capay Valley Page 10 = Night Heron Historical Society and our many Page 11 = Magpie member-subscribers. Page 12 = Red-winged Black Bird Mostly, the articles are arranged in Page 13-15 = Mockingbird the order they were presented in the Page 16-17 = Meadowlark journals, which you can see in their Page 18-20 = Mourning Doves and Dove-weed complete form on our website at Pages 21-23 = Quail greatercapayvalley.org Pages 24-30 = Owls or by buying the book: The History Page 31 = Hawks and Stories of the Capay Valley, a Page 32 = Vultures compilation of all 18 journals; Page 33-35 = Western Kingbirds and Bullocks Orioles purchasing information is on the Page 36 = Poppies & Lupin website.
    [Show full text]
  • Marsh Hawk Chases Crows Mobbing
    March 1970 98 THE WILSON BULLETIN Vol. 82, No. 1 out of 246 attempts. All prey were captured on the ground. In 41 cases, the prey item was positively identified through binoculars or by the examination of fragments dropped in feeding. Of the identified items, 9 were short-horned grasshoppers (Acrididae), 19 were long-horned grasshoppers (Tettigoniidae), and 11 were lizards of the genus Anolis (probably Anolis limifrons). One item was a large cockroach (Blattidae) and the last was a small colubrid snake. This list is probably biased since grasshoppers and other large insects were difficult to identify at a distance but were abundant in the area. In about 30 cases where identity could not be certainly established, it appeared that the bird was tearing off wings as it characteristically did with large insects. The lizards and snake on the other hand, were easily distinguished by their long tails which hung down from the hawks’ talons. I recorded about thirty additional prey captures by other individuals wintering in the Turrialba area, but, because of the greater distance from the observer, only four of these could be identified. Two were Anolis lizards and one was a tettigoniid grasshopper. A good-sized Ameiva lizard (probably Ameiva festiva) was taken by a wintering female. Am&a lizards were present on the territory of the male hawk at the Institute, but no captures were recorded. It may be that the significantly larger size of females permits them to take larger prey, but these few data are not sufficient to justify such a state- ment.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthoptera: Ensifera)?
    Zootaxa 4291 (1): 001–033 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4291.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BD31B828-E7EF-46AD-B618-1BAAA2D63DBD Tackling an intractable problem: Can greater taxon sampling help resolve relationships within the Stenopelmatoidea (Orthoptera: Ensifera)? AMY G. VANDERGAST1,7, DAVID B. WEISSMAN2, DUSTIN A. WOOD3, DAVID C. F. RENTZ4, CORINNA S. BAZELET5 & NORIHIRO UESHIMA6 1U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, San Diego Field Station, 4165 Spruance Road Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92101, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Entomology, California Academy of Sciences, 55 Music Concourse Drive, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 3U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, San Diego Field Station, 4165 Spruance Road Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92101, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 4School of Marine & Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] 5Steinhardt Museum, Tel Aviv University, Department of Zoology, Sherman Building Rm. 403, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Conser- vation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa. E-mail: [email protected] 61435-1 Kubocho, Matsusaka, Mie 515-0044, Japan. E-mail: [email protected] 7Corresponding Author Abstract The relationships among and within the families that comprise the orthopteran superfamily Stenopelmatoidea (suborder Ensifera) remain poorly understood. We developed a phylogenetic hypothesis based on Bayesian analysis of two nuclear ribosomal and one mitochondrial gene for 118 individuals (84 de novo and 34 from GenBank).
    [Show full text]
  • (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Tettigonia) in the Western Palaearctic: Testing Concordance Between Molecular, Acoustic, and Morphological Data
    Org Divers Evol (2017) 17:213–228 DOI 10.1007/s13127-016-0313-3 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Evolution and systematics of Green Bush-crickets (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Tettigonia) in the Western Palaearctic: testing concordance between molecular, acoustic, and morphological data Beata Grzywacz1 & Klaus-Gerhard Heller2 & Elżbieta Warchałowska-Śliwa 1 & Tatyana V. Karamysheva 3 & Dragan P. Chobanov4 Received: 14 June 2016 /Accepted: 16 November 2016 /Published online: 8 December 2016 # The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract The genus Tettigonia includes 26 species distribut- of Tettigonia (currently classified mostly according to mor- ed in the Palaearctic region. Though the Green Bush-crickets phological characteristics), proposing seven new synonymies. are widespread in Europe and common in a variety of habitats throughout the Palaearctic ecozone, the genus is still in need Keywords Tettigonia . mtDNA . rDNA . Phylogeny . of scientific attention due to the presence of a multitude of Bioacoustics poorly explored taxa. In the present study, we sought to clarify the evolutionary relationships of Green Bush-crickets and the composition of taxa occurring in the Western Palaearctic. Introduction Based on populations from 24 disjunct localities, the phylog- eny of the group was estimated using sequences of the cyto- Genus Tettigonia Linnaeus, 1758 presently includes 26 recog- chrome oxidase subunit I (COI) and the internal transcribed nized species (Eades et al. 2016) distributed in the Palaearctic spacers 1 and 2 (ITS1 and ITS2). Morphological and acoustic ecozone and belongs to the long-horned orthopterans or the variation documented for the examined populations and taxa bush-crickets (Ensifera, Tettigonioidea). Tettigonia,popularly was interpreted in the context of phylogenetic relationships known as the Green Bush-crickets, are generally large green inferred from our genetic analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthopterans (Insecta: Orthoptera) of Conservation Value in the Eurasian Eagle Owl Bubo Bubo Food in Bulgaria
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa” 63 (2): 161–167 (2020) doi: 10.3897/travaux.63.e53867 SHORT COMMUNICATION Orthopterans (Insecta: Orthoptera) of conservation value in the Eurasian Eagle Owl Bubo bubo food in Bulgaria Dragan Chobanov1, Boyan Milchev2 1 Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd., BG-1000 Sofia, Bulgaria 2 University of Forestry, Wildlife Management Department, 10 Kl. Ohridski Blvd., BG-1756 Sofia, Bulgaria Corresponding author: Dragan Chobanov ([email protected]) Received 2 May 2020 | Accepted 22 June 2020 | Published 31 December 2020 Citation: Chobanov D, Milchev B (2020) Orthopterans (Insecta: Orthoptera) of conservation value in the Eurasian Eagle Owl Bubo bubo food in Bulgaria. Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa” 63(2): 161–167. https://doi.org/10.3897/travaux.63.e53867 Abstract Three species of Bush-crickets (Orthoptera) of conservation value or poorly known were found in the Eurasian Eagle Owl food in southeastern Bulgaria. Their localities are new country records and two of them cover Natura 2000 SCI zones. The repeated predation on Bradyporus macrogaster in UTM square MG99 confirms the potential of this area for a new Natura 2000 site. Keywords Bush-cricket, Tettigoniidae, pellet analysis, Natura 2000 Introduction The Balkan Peninsula has the highest diversity of Orthopterans (grasshoppers, crickets and bush-crickets) in Europe and is one of the most biologically diverse areas in the Palearctic realm. Half of the 1083 species of European Orthoptera occur here (Hochkirch et al. 2016). The largest diversity hotspot in Europe is located in the middle of the Balkans — along the valleys of Vardar and Struma Rivers (com- pare fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Raptors of the Hanford Site and Nearby Areas of Southcentral Washington
    Raptors of the Hanford Site and Nearby Areas of Southcentral Washington <. *." . Prepared for the ~e~kmentof Energy and Rockwell Hanford Operations under Contract DE-AC06-76RLO 1830 Pacific Northwest Laboratory Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy bv Battelle Memorial Institute NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the Department of Energy, nor any of their employe, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, maker any warranty, express ar implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, cornpletenas or usefulness of myinformation, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privateiy owned rights. The views, opinions and conctusions contained in this report arc those of the contractor and do not necessarily represent those of the United Statn Government or the United States Department of Energy. PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORY operated by BATTELLE for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Under Contract Of-ACW76Rt0 7830 hinted in tha United Strta of Amcrka Availah frm WiTatYlnkat tnlwauw krvin uniacd Lacs I3egmmcrR cd c- 5235 Port Royd Wed Syxir%(idd, Virginia a51 wee: hint& Copy S';Wefirhc $3.00 NTlS *Paps M%ngRice 081-025 taw OWHo IcYl 051479 %.a O?&tm rrtm 763-125 W6J l&tse $7.25 151-175 $&(XI '1r6-wo woo m-225 W2s 226-ZU, Rw, 251-275 51075 P6.300 $11.00 RAPTORS OF THE HANFORD SITE AND NEARBY AREAS OF SOUTHCENTRAL WASHINGTON R. E. Fitzner W. H. Rickard L. L. Cadwell L.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Freshwater Invertebrates of the Mekong River and Its Tributaries
    Chapter 17 Order Orthoptera Orthopterans live mainly in terrestrial environments, but some are hydrophilous are adapted to live along the margins of streams (Cantrall & Brusven, 1996). The semiaquatic orthopterans consist of grasshoppers, grouse locusts, pygmy mole crickets and mole crickets. Mole crickets (Gryllotalpidae) burrow into wet muddy soil along margin of freshwater habitats. Pygmy mole crickets (Tridactylidae) prefer to burrow into moist soil. Grouse locusts (Tetrigridae) usually sit on rocks along the margins of streams or in moist areas. Grasshoppers (Acrididae and Tettigoniidae) often occur in the paddy fields and grasslands. Mole crickets bear front tibia modified for digging into muddy soil.The body is covered with short, fine setae to keep mud off the body. Grouse locusts have no special structures for swimming but they can jump off water very quickly if they fall onto its surface. Bishop (1973) noted that tridactylids might jump into water and burrow into the bottom sediments when they were disturbed. Field crickets (Gryllidae) burrow into shallow soil. Little attention is given to this order, because most of Orthopterans have little economic importance. However, field crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus, are cultured for human consumption in Thailand. In this key Blaberidae is included in this order. This amphibious cockroach occurs in debris accumulations or beneath stones near aquatic habitats. KEY TO FAMILIES OF ADULT SEMIAQUATIC ORTHOPTERA OF INDOCHINA 1 Body not cockroach-like ........................................................................................... 2 1′ Body dorsoventally flattened and cockroach-like (Fig. 1) .......................BLABERIDAE 2(1) Front and middle tarsi 2 segmented .......................................................................... 3 2′ Front and middle tarsi 3 or 4 segmented .................................................................. 4 3(2) Pronotum prolonged posteriorly to abdomen (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution to the Study of the Diet of Four Owl Species (Aves, Strigiformes) from Mainland and Island Areas of Greece
    Belg. J. Zool., 135 (2) : 109-118 July 2005 Contribution to the study of the diet of four owl species (Aves, Strigiformes) from mainland and island areas of Greece Haralambos Alivizatos1, Vassilis Goutner2 and Stamatis Zogaris3 1 4 Zaliki Street, GR-11524 Athens, Greece 2 Department of Zoology, School of Biology, Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124, Thessaloniki, Greece 3 40 Perrikou Street, GR-11524 Athens, Greece Corresponding author : Vassilis Goutner, e-mail : [email protected] ABSTRACT. The diets of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba), Little Owl (Athene noctua), Long-eared Owl (Asio otus) and Eagle Owl (Bubo bubo) were studied through analysis of pellets collected at 13 different continental areas and islands of Greece. The most important prey of the Barn Owl was mammals (mainly Microtus, Mus, Apodemus, Rat- tus and Crocidura), although birds and amphibians were of some importance on Antikythera island and Potidea (Central Macedonia), respectively. Average prey biomass ranged from 12.5 g to 42.8 g. The median prey biomass differed significantly between areas (p<0.001). The diet of the Little Owl was more diverse, consisting mainly of mammals (mostly Microtus, Mus, Apodemus, Micromys and Crocidura) in the Evros and Axios Deltas, mainly of insects (mostly Orthoptera and Coleoptera) in the Kitros Lagoon, Psara and Tilos islands, while birds and reptiles were common supplementary prey. Average prey biomass ranged from 0.7 g to 11.9 g. The median prey biomass differed significantly between the areas studied (p<0.001). The diet of the Long-eared Owl in both Nestos Delta and Porto Lagos consisted mainly of mammals (mostly Microtus, Mus and Apodemus), with some reptiles in the former area and birds in the latter.
    [Show full text]