DOCSLIB.ORG

East Surrey Strategic Housing Market Assessment 2007 / 08

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
East Surrey Strategic Housing Market Assessment 2007 / 08 EAST SURREY STRATEGIC HOUSING MARKET ASSESSMENT FINAL REPORT 2008 East Surrey Strategic Housing Market Assessment 2007 / 08 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT........................................................................................................ 4 1.2 WHY CARRY OUT A STRATEGIC HOUSING MARKET ASSESSMENT? ................................................ 4 1.3 METHODOLOGY AND REPORT STRUCTURE .................................................................................... 5 1.4 REPORT STRUCTURE ................................................................................................................... 7 1.5 GLOSSARY OF TERMS .................................................................................................................. 9 1.6 DATA BENCHMARKING.................................................................................................................. 9 1.7 KEY OUTPUTS OF THE SHMA....................................................................................................... 9 2 UNDERSTANDING THE EAST SURREY HOUSING MARKET.................................................... 11 2.1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................... 11 2.2 THE CONTEXT OF EAST SURREY ................................................................................................ 11 2.3 IDENTIFYING HOUSING MARKET AREA BOUNDARIES .................................................................... 18 2.4 HOUSEHOLD MOVEMENTS .......................................................................................................... 20 2.5 TRAVEL TO WORK PATTERNS IN AND AROUND EAST SURREY ....................................................... 25 2.6 IS EAST SURREY A SINGLE MARKET?.......................................................................................... 26 3 STRATEGIC CONTEXT.................................................................................................................. 28 3.2 NATIONAL POLICIES ................................................................................................................... 28 3.3 OVERALL SUPPLY ...................................................................................................................... 28 3.4 REGIONAL AND COUNTY-WIDE POLICIES ..................................................................................... 34 3.5 LOCAL POLICY CONTEXT ............................................................................................................ 40 3.6 ELMBRIDGE ............................................................................................................................... 41 3.7 EPSOM & EWELL........................................................................................................................ 42 3.8 MOLE VALLEY............................................................................................................................ 44 3.9 REIGATE & BANSTEAD................................................................................................................ 47 3.10 TANDRIDGE ............................................................................................................................... 49 4 THE DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC CONTEXT..................................................................... 51 4.1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................... 51 4.2 THE CURRENT DEMOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE................................................................................. 51 4.3 HOUSEHOLD NUMBERS, CHARACTERISTICS & COMPOSITION ....................................................... 55 4.4 MIGRATION ................................................................................................................................58 4.5 ECONOMIC DRIVERS OF DEMAND................................................................................................ 61 4.6 THE IMPACT OF NATIONAL AND REGIONAL ECONOMIC POLICY...................................................... 61 4.7 KEY FINDINGS............................................................................................................................ 61 4.8 EMPLOYMENT ............................................................................................................................ 62 4.9 ECONOMIC ACTIVITY AND UNEMPLOYMENT ................................................................................. 64 4.10 OCCUPATIONAL STRUCTURE ...................................................................................................... 66 4.11 COMMUTERS ............................................................................................................................. 67 4.12 INCOME ..................................................................................................................................... 68 4.13 SKILLS AND EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT ...................................................................................... 70 5 THE CURRENT HOUSING STOCK ............................................................................................... 72 5.1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................... 72 5.2 KEY FINDINGS............................................................................................................................ 72 5.3 HOUSING UNITS......................................................................................................................... 73 5.4 TENURE PROFILE....................................................................................................................... 73 5.5 TYPE PROFILE ........................................................................................................................... 76 5.6 SIZE PROFILE ............................................................................................................................ 77 5.7 INTERMEDIATE HOUSING ............................................................................................................ 77 5.8 SECOND HOMES ........................................................................................................................ 78 5.9 PROPERTY CONDITION ............................................................................................................... 79 5.10 OVER-CROWDING AND UNDER-OCCUPATION .............................................................................. 81 5.11 SHARED HOUSING & COMMUNAL ESTABLISHMENTS..................................................................... 84 1 DCA East Surrey Strategic Housing Market Assessment 2007 / 08 6 THE ACTIVE MARKET................................................................................................................... 85 6.2 KEY POINTS:- ............................................................................................................................ 85 6.3 HOUSE PRICES .......................................................................................................................... 85 6.4 AFFORDABILITY ISSUES .............................................................................................................. 88 6.5 LOWEST QUARTILE ENTRY SALES LEVELS IN EAST SURREY......................................................... 91 6.6 PURCHASE INCOME THRESHOLDS............................................................................................... 92 6.7 RENTING A PROPERTY ............................................................................................................... 93 6.8 PRIVATE SECTOR ENTRY LEVEL RENTS IN EAST SURREY ............................................................ 94 6.9 RENTAL INCOME THRESHOLDS ................................................................................................... 95 6.10 VACANCIES, TURNOVER RATES AND AVAILABLE SUPPLY BY TENURE .............................................. 95 6.11 TURNOVER RATES ..................................................................................................................... 97 7 BRINGING THE EVIDENCE TOGETHER...................................................................................... 98 7.1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................... 98 7.2 THE EAST SURREY MARKET ....................................................................................................... 98 7.3 TRENDS AND DRIVERS ............................................................................................................... 98 8 THE FUTURE HOUSING MARKET.............................................................................................. 103 8.1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 103 8.2 POPULATION PROJECTIONS...................................................................................................... 103 8.3 KEY FINDINGS.......................................................................................................................... 103 8.4 FORECAST CHANGE IN HOUSEHOLDS 2004-2026 ....................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MID SUSSEX DISTRICT COUNCIL Planning Committee 8 APR 2021
    MID SUSSEX DISTRICT COUNCIL Planning Committee 8 APR 2021 RECOMMENDED FOR PERMISSION Worth DM/20/4654 © Crown Copyright and database rights 2021 Ordnance Survey 100021794 TWOWAYS STATION ROAD CRAWLEY DOWN CRAWLEY DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING DETACHED BUNGALOW AND THE ERECTION OF 3NO. FOUR BEDROOM DETACHED HOUSES WITH ASSOCIATE GARAGES JAMIE COPLAND POLICY: Ashdown Forest SPA/SAC / Built Up Areas / Classified Roads - 20m buffer / Aerodrome Safeguarding (CAA) / ODPM CODE: Minor Dwellings 8 WEEK DATE: 12th April 2021 WARD MEMBERS: Cllr Phillip Coote / Cllr Ian Gibson / Cllr Roger Webb / CASE OFFICER: Joseph Swift PURPOSE OF REPORT To consider the recommendation of the Divisional Leader, Planning and Economy on the application for planning permission as detailed above. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This application seeks planning permission for the demolition of the existing detached bungalow and erection of 3no. four bedroom detached houses with associated garages at Twoways, Station Road, Crawley Down which is designated within the Mid Sussex District Plan as being within the built up area boundaries. The application has been called in by Cllr Coote, Cllr Gibson and Cllr Webb on the grounds of overdevelopment and not in-keeping within the street scene. Planning legislation requires the application to be determined in accordance with the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. It is therefore necessary for the planning application to be assessed against the policies in the development plan and then to take account of other material planning considerations including the NPPF. National planning policy states that planning should be genuinely plan led. The Council has a recently adopted District Plan and is able to demonstrate that it has a five year housing land supply.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Summary
    CLIMATE EMERGENCY PROGRESS CHECKLIST - 10 December 2019 NB. This is work in progress! We have almost certainly missed some actions. Please contact [email protected] with any news or updates. County/Authority Council Status County/Authority Council Status Brighton & Hove BRIGHTON & HOVE CITY COUNCIL DECLARED Dec 2018 KENT COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed May 2019 WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed - April 2019 Ashford Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 Adur Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Canterbury City Council DECLARED July 2019 Arun District Council DECLARED Nov 2019 Dartford Borough Council DECLARED Oct 2019 Chichester City Council DECLARED June 2019 Dover District Council Campaign in progress West Sussex Chichester District Council DECLARED July 2019 Folkestone and Hythe District Council DECLARED July 2019 Crawley Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Gravesham Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Kent Horsham District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Maidstone Borough Council DECLARED April 2019 Mid Sussex District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Medway Council DECLARED April 2019 Worthing Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Sevenoaks District Council Motion Passed - Nov 2019 EAST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL DECLARED Oct 2019 Swale Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Eastbourne Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Thanet District Council DECLARED July 2019 Hastings Borough Council DECLARED Dec 2018 Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 East Sussex Lewes District Council DECLARED July 2019 Tunbridge
    [Show full text]
  • Mole Valley Local Development Framework
    Appendix A Sevenoaks District Local Development Framework The Future of Sevenoaks District Local Plan Policies beyond September 2007 The Sevenoaks District Local Plan was adopted in March 2000. All the policies in the Sevenoaks District Local Plan were saved for a period of three years from the commencement of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act on 28th September 2004 until 27th September 2007. No Local Plan policies will be replaced by policies in the Core Strategy or other new Development Plan Documents before 27th September 2007. The Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG) issued a protocol for saving adopted Local Plan policies beyond the initial three-year saved period in August 2006. It sets out the criteria that Local Plan policies must meet if they are to have their life extended beyond September 2007. The Council must submit a list of all those Local Plan policies that it wishes to extend and those it does not wish to save, with reasons, to the Secretary of State, through the Government Office for the South East (GOSE), by 1st April 2007. The following two tables list all the Sevenoaks District Local Plan policies. The first table lists those saved Sevenoaks District Local Plan policies that the Council wishes to continue to use beyond September 2007, together with reasons. The second table lists those saved Local Plan policies that the Council does not wish to save beyond September 2007 with reasons. Saved Sevenoaks District Local Plan policies the Council wishes to extend beyond the three-year saved period Consistent with - Regional Policy – RPG9 & The Policy Title South East Plan (SEP), Reasons for wishing to extend policy The Community Plan (CP) Chapter 4 Environment EN1 Development Yes, PPS1 (Delivering The policy is consistent with national and regional policy on the design of Control - Sustainable Development) development set out in PPS1.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. Principal Area Boundary Review Borough of Gravesham/Borough of Dartford/District of Sevenoaks LOCAL GOVEHNICWT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND HEK)hT NO. LOCAL GOVKRflUEJlT BOI'NJJAHY COMMISSION FOR CHAIRMAN Mr C J Ellerton CMC MB1C Mr J U Powell PRICE FGV* Lady Aoknur lir T Brockbank DI^ Professor G E Cherry Mr K J L Newell Me B Qcholee QBE THE RT. HON. PATRICK JENKIN MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT 1. At present the New Barn residential area is split between Dartford Borough, Sevenoaks District and Gravesham Borough; the part situated in Dartford is in the parish of ^outhfleet; the part in Sevenoaks is in the parish of Longfield, whilst the part in Gravesham is unparished. On 30 November 1979» Gravesham Borough Council requested ue to review the boundaries between the districts of Gravesham, Dartford and Sevenoaks in the vicinity of New Barn. Their request was in response to representations from the New Barn Ratepayers Association for the whole of the New Barn residential area to be incorporated within Gravesham Borough. The Association based their representations on a survey of opinion which they carried out in 1978 among the residents of New Barn on the question of whether the area should be under one authority, and if so, which one. The results indicated that a majority (8?#) of residents indicating a view preferred to see New Barn under one authority and a large proportion (6990 of these considered that this should be Gravesham. 2. We noted that Kent County Council, Dartford Borough Council, Sevenoaks District Council, and Longfield Parish Council were all opposed to a review beinp undertaken at that time, although Kent County Council and Dartford BOrough Council did a^ree that the current boundaries in the New Barn area were not wholly satisfactory.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment DGS
    1 Kent Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment Dartford, Gravesend, Swanley and surrounding areas co-terminus with Dartford, Gravesham & Swanley CCG The accompanying maps etc. in Appendix A should be viewed alongside this document Kent PNA 2018- DGS CCG area Final version March 2018 2 Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3 Transport Links ................................................................................................ 8 Pharmaceutical Services in the area ................................................................ 8 Healthy Living Pharmacies ............................................................................ 14 Housing .......................................................................................................... 15 Kent PNA 2015 – Dartford, Gravesham and Swanley area ........................... 16 Consultation ................................................................................................... 16 Conclusions and recommendations Kent PNA 2018 DGS area .................... 17 Document Version Control ............................................................................. 18 Kent PNA 2018- DGS CCG area Final version March 2018 3 Introduction This document has been written as part of the main Kent Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment (PNA) to allow judgements to be made using local data. This document should be read in conjunction with the main Kent PNA. The area consists of 3 main towns, Dartford, Gravesend
    [Show full text]
  • Census Joint Committee (Central Sussex Partnership)
    CenSus Joint Committee (Central Sussex Partnership) Minutes of a meeting held in the Council Chamber, Civic Centre, Shoreham-by-Sea at 10.00am on Friday 19 June 2015 Present: Councillors: Neil Parkin (Chairman), Adur District Council Jim Funnell, Adur District Council Brian Donnelly, Horsham District Council Gary Marsh, Mid Sussex District Council Apologies: Councillors: Daniel Humphreys, Worthing Borough Council Mark Nolan, Worthing Borough Council Gordon Lindsay, Horsham District Council Jonathan Ash-Edwards, Mid Sussex District Council Also Present: Jane Eckford, Director for Customer Services, Adur and Worthing Councils Paul Brewer, Director for Digital & Resources, Adur and Worthing Councils Paul Tonking, Head of Revenues & Benefits, Adur and Worthing Councils Dave Briggs, Head of Design & Digital, Adur and Worthing Councils Neil Terry, Senior Democratic Services Officer, Adur and Worthing Councils Andrew Mathias, Senior Solicitor, Adur and Worthing Councils Katharine Eberhart, Director of Corporate Resources, Horsham District Council Tim Delany, Head of CenSus Revenues and Benefits, Mid Sussex District Council Peter Stuart, Head of Finance: CenSus CFO, Mid Sussex District Council John Ross, Head of CenSus ICT, Horsham District Council CJC/001/15-16 Declarations of Interest None. CJC/002/15-16 Minutes Resolved that the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 27 March 2015 be agreed and signed by the Chairman CJC/003/15-16 Urgent Items None. CJC/004/15-16 CenSus Annual Return 2014/15 The Committee received a report from the Head of Finance: CenSus CFO, setting out the CenSus Annual Return accounting statement for the partnership to be audited by PKF Littlejohn. The Committee was advised that the return fulfilled statutory requirements to report on the financial standing of the entity.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Collection Commitment Signatories
    Signatories to the Waste Collection Commitment North East Eastern Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council Peterborough City Council Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council Fenland District Council Hartlepool Borough Council Tendring District Council Darlington Borough Council Maldon District Council Gateshead Council Colchester Borough Council Durham Council Chelmsford Borough Council Middlesbrough Council Castle Point Borough Council North Tyneside Borough Council Braintree District Council North Norfolk District Council North West St Edmundsbury Borough Council Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council Forest Heath District Council Hyndburn Borough Council Central Bedfordshire Council Fylde Borough Council South Cambridgeshire District Council Blackburn with Darwen Council Southend-on-Sea Borough Council Cheshire East Council Dacorum Borough Council Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council Broadland District Council Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council Hertsmere Borough Council Wyre Borough Council South Ribble Borough Council East Midlands Stockport Council Chesterfield Borough Council North West Leicestershire District Council West Midlands Charnwood Borough Council Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council Blaby District Council Stratford-on-Avon District Council West Lindsey District Council Shropshire Council North Kesteven District Council Wolverhampton City Council South Holland District Council Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council Boston Borough Council Lichfield District Council South Kesteven District Council Stafford Borough Council Lincoln City
    [Show full text]
  • The Gatwick Diamond Initiative
    The Gatwick Diamond Initiative Management Group Terms of Reference The Management Group are responsible for the management of the GDI’s business and affairs, for which purpose they may exercise all the powers of the Gatwick Diamond Initiative. Refer to the Articles of Association for the full powers and responsibilities of the Management Group. The role of the Management Group is: • Operational management and coordination of the implementation of the Gatwick Diamond Future Plan and subsequent business plans • Financial and performance management of the Gatwick Diamond Initiative as a whole and of each of the Thematic Working Groups • Coordination and identification of potential Gatwick Diamond funding sources and delegation of funding applications to appropriate parties, including the Working Groups or Gatwick Diamond Executive Director • Strategic engagement with Gatwick Airport The Management Group meets at least every quarter. Members The Management Group is also the Board of Directors and is made of up Non Executive Directors. Board Directors Chair of the Management Board David Butcher MD FD Outsourcing Ltd Business Member Paul Gresham Business Member Divorce Accounting Ltd Karim Mohamed Business Member Mayo Wynne Baxter John Donaldson Business Member Arora Hotels Mark Pearson Business Member Surrey Connects Lee Harris Local Authority Member Crawley Borough Council Tom Crowley Local Authority Member Horsham District Council Kathryn Hall Local Authority Member Mid Sussex District Council Frances Rutter Local Authority Member Epsom
    [Show full text]
  • Leigh Flood Storage Area Expansion Scheme Planning, Design and Access Statement August 2020
    Leigh Flood Storage Area Expansion Scheme Planning, Design and Access Statement August 2020 Environment Agency i Leigh Flood Storage Area Expansion Scheme We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the environment and make it a better place for people and wildlife. We operate at the place where environmental change has its greatest impact on people’s lives. We reduce the risks to people and properties from flooding; make sure there is enough water for people and wildlife; protect and improve air, land and water quality and apply the environmental standards within which industry can operate. Acting to reduce climate change and helping people and wildlife adapt to its consequences are at the heart of all that we do. We cannot do this alone. We work closely with a wide range of partners including government, business, local authorities, other agencies, civil society groups and the communities we serve. Published by: Environment Agency Horizon house, Deanery Road Bristol BS1 5AH Email: enquiries@environment- agency.gov.uk www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency 2011 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Environment Agency ii Quality Assurance Project name Leigh FSA Expansion Scheme Project 1B1S reference Date 26th August 2020 Version number 01 Author Della Adams Approvals Name Signature Title Date Version Jon Walton JBA Consulting Project 24/08/2020 01 Manager Leigh FSA Expansion Scheme Planning, Design & Access Statement iii Summary The Leigh Flood Storage Area (FSA) situated approximately 3km west of Tonbridge in Kent was constructed in 1982 and currently reduces flood risk from the River Medway to properties in Tonbridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Oldbury and Seal Chart SSSI Designation
    COUNTY: KENT SITE NAME: OLDBURY AND SEAL CHART DISTRICTS: TONBRIDGE AND MALLING; SEVENOAKS Status: Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) notified under Section 28 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 as amended. Local Planning Authorities: Tonbridge and Malling District Council, Sevenoaks District Council National Grid Reference: TQ 571558 Area: 173.93 (ha.) 429.77 (ac.) Ordnance Survey Sheet 1:50,000: 188 1:10,000: TQ 188 Date Notified (Under 1949 Act): 1951 Date of Last Revision: 1981 Date Notified (Under 1981 Act): 1990 Other Information: The site lies within the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. Part of the site is owned by the National Trust. The boundary has been amended at renotification by several extensions and deletions. Description: This site lies on the Lower Greensand ridge to the east of Sevenoaks. It contains acidic sessile oak woodland of ancient origin, more typical of northern and western Britain, together with relict heathland communities and more recently-derived secondary woodland. An outstanding assemblage of fungi is present, numbering over 250 species and including several that are rare* or scarce** in Britain. Characteristic communities of invertebrates and bryophytes (mosses and liverworts also occur. Most of the woodland on the Lower Greensand in Kent is of recent secondary origin, often having developed over former heathland. The fact that much of the woodland on this site is ancient makes it of particular interest. The composition of the woodland varies considerably: towards the north and east of the site sessile oak Quercus petraea coppice is widespread with beech Fagus sylvatica and sessile oak standards.
    [Show full text]
  • 73341 Adur Worthing.Indd
    Case Study Adur & Worthing Councils IT Services Ricoh IT Service transforms local authority ability to deliver shared services and improve best value Adur & Worthing Councils typify local government efforts solution developed by Ricoh - in three months instead of six to combine resources and provide shared services and best - has reduced costs and is expected to pay for itself in two value to the communities they serve. The Councils have years; and has made it easier, quicker and more environmen- used a Ricoh IT Service to transform the way they provide tally friendly to deploy shared ICT services. ICT services. The virtual desktop environment infrastructure Executive summary Name: Adur & Worthing Councils Benefits Location: Shoreham-by-Sea and Worthing, • Achieves significant cost savings which underpin an West Sussex ‘invest to save’ funding strategy Size: 1,300 staff • Return on investment expected in two years Activity: Local government • Helps Councils achieve best value service delivery Challenges • Makes it easier and quicker to deploy shared ICT services • Improve the ability to deliver best value to the community • Delivered a fully-operational, enterprise-wide, six-month • Support a significant change in Council staff working project in just three months practice • Reduces carbon emissions and improves environmental • Enable ICT to support delivery of Council services more credentials efficiently Solution • Ricoh IT Service Case Study Adur & Worthing Councils Challenges tions. Some HR staff were fixed workers with their own desks and desktop PCs, while others worked from hot desks Adur & Worthing Councils in West Sussex are two separate or from home using laptops (flexible). local authorities that have come together to deliver best val- ue to their communities by sharing services.
    [Show full text]
  • Lewes District Local Plan Part 2 Submission and It Sets out How the Duty to Cooperate Has Been Met in Preparing This Plan
    Lewes District Local Plan Part 2 – Site Allocations & Development Management Policies Duty to Cooperate Statement December 2018 Contents Introduction 3 Context 4 Cross Boundary Strategic Planning Priorities 4 Key Relationships and Ongoing Work and Outcomes 7 Appendix – Statements of Common Ground 10 2 1 Introduction 1.1 The Localism Act 2011 places a duty on local planning authorities and other prescribed bodies to cooperate with each other on strategic planning matters relevant to their areas. The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) reiterates this duty and requires an independent inspector to assess whether the plan they are examining has been prepared in accordance with the duty. 1.2 This statement has been prepared as a supporting document to the Lewes District Local Plan Part 2 submission and it sets out how the Duty to Cooperate has been met in preparing this plan. 1.3 The Duty to Cooperate requires ongoing constructive and active engagement on the preparation of development plan documents and other activities relating to sustainable development and the use of land. In particular it applies to strategic planning matters where they affect more than one local planning authority area. 1.4 Most cross-boundary issues affecting the district were dealt with in the recently adopted Local Plan Part 1and do not fall to be re-opened. Local Plan Part 2 is not a strategic plan; rather it is the detailed implementation of the existing strategic plan – the Local Plan Part 1. 1.5 In the Report on the Examination into the Lewes District Local Plan Part 1 – Joint Core Strategy1 published on 22nd March 2016 the Inspector confirmed in his assessment of the duty to cooperate: “The Councils have established effective and on-going working relationships with neighbouring and nearby local planning authorities, particularly through the East Sussex Strategic Planning Members Group and the Coastal West Sussex and Greater Brighton Strategic Planning Board.
    [Show full text]