DOCSLIB.ORG

This Washington Post-Schar School Poll Was Conducted by Telephone Oct

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

This Washington Post-Schar School poll was conducted by telephone Oct. 13-19, 2020, among a random sample of 1,109 adults in Virginia, including subsamples of 1,001 registered voters and 908 likely voters. Overall, 71 percent of respondents were reached on cellphones and 29 percent on landlines. Sampling, data collection and tabulation by SSRS of Glen Mills, Penn. Unweighted sample size Error margin* Virginia registered voters 1,001 +/-3.5 Virginia likely voters 908 4 *All error margins calculated including design effects due to weighting. (Full methodological details and sampling error margins for subgroups appended at the end.) *= less than 0.5 percent RV=Registered voters LV=Likely voters 1. (ASK IF REGISTERED TO VOTE) I’d like you to rate the chances that you will vote in the presidential election this fall: Are you absolutely certain to vote, will you probably vote, are the chances 50-50, or less than that? Don't think Already Certain Probably Chances Less than will vote voted No to vote vote 50/50 that (vol.) (vol.) op. 10/19/20 VA 77 2 3 1 1 16 * 2. (ASK IF CERTAIN OR PROBABLY VOTE) Do you think you’ll (vote in person at a polling place ON Election Day), or (vote early either by mail or in person BEFORE Election Day)? Vote on Vote Already No Election Day early voted (vol.) opinion 10/19/20 VA 46 33 20 1 3. (ASK IF VOTE EARLY OR ALREADY VOTED) How do you think you will/did you vote - (in person at an early voting location), (by dropping off a ballot at a designated drop- box), or (by mail)? Drop off No In person ballot Mail opinion 10/19/20 VA 59 13 28 * 2/3 NET ------------ Vote early ------------ Vote on In Drop off No No Election Day NET person ballot Mail op. opinion 10/19/20 VA 46 53 31 7 15 * 1 1 4. If the presidential election were being held today and the candidates were [(Donald Trump and Mike Pence, the Republicans), (Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, the Democrats)], or Jo Jorgensen and Spike Cohen of the Libertarian Party, for whom would you vote? Would you lean toward [(Trump and Pence), (Biden and Harris)], or Jorgensen and Cohen? (IF ALREADY VOTED) Confidentially and for statistical purposes only, did you vote for...? NET LEANED VOTE PREFERENCE None Would Other of these not vote No Trump Biden Jorgensen (vol.) (vol.) (vol.) op. 10/19/20 VA LV 41 52 3 * * * 4 5.(ASK IF REGISTERED TO VOTE) Who do you trust more to handle [ITEM] – (Trump) or (Biden)? 10/19/20 – Summary table among Virginia registered voters Both Neither No Trump Biden (vol.) (vol.) opinion a. the economy 45 48 * 5 2 b. the coronavirus outbreak 36 54 1 7 2 Thinking now about the U.S. Senate race in Virginia, 6. If the election were today would you vote for (Mark Warner, the Democrat) or (Daniel Gade, the Republican)? Would you lean toward (Warner) or (Gade)? (IF ALREADY VOTED) Did you vote for...? NET LEANED VOTE PREFERENCE Would Other Neither not vote No Warner Gade (vol.) (vol.) (vol.) opinion 10/19/20 VA LV 57 39 * * 0 4 Thinking about the election for U.S. House of Representatives, 7. If the election were held today, would you vote for the (Democratic candidate) or the (Republican candidate) in your congressional district? Would you lean toward the (Democratic candidate) or toward the (Republican candidate)? (IF ALREADY VOTED) Did you vote for (the Democratic candidate) or (the Republican candidate) in your congressional district? NET LEANED VOTE PREFERENCE Would Democratic Republican Other Neither not vote No candidate candidate (vol.) (vol.) (vol.) opinion 10/19/20 VA LV 50 42 * 1 * 7 8. Amendment 1 on Virginia ballots this fall is a proposal to amend the state constitution to establish a redistricting commission of citizens and members of the Virginia General Assembly. The commission would be responsible for drawing congressional and state legislative districts. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on this proposal? (IF ALREADY VOTED) Did you vote yes or no on this proposal? Vote yes Vote no No opinion 10/19/20 VA LV 51 32 17 2 9a. (IF VOTING FOR TRUMP) Thinking about when the vote count is complete in November, if Biden has more votes than Trump in enough states to win the presidential election, are you willing to accept Biden's victory as legitimate, or are you not willing to do that? Willing Not willing Depends No to accept to accept (vol.) opinion 10/19/20 VA 66 26 6 2 9b. (IF VOTING FOR BIDEN) Thinking about when the vote count is complete in November, if Trump has more votes than Biden in enough states to win the presidential election, are you willing to accept Trump's victory as legitimate, or are you not willing to do that? Willing Not willing Depends No to accept to accept (vol.) opinion 10/19/20 VA 64 31 3 2 10.(ASK IF REGISTERED TO VOTE) On another subject, do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling his job as president? Do you approve/disapprove strongly or somewhat? -------- Approve -------- ------ Disapprove ------- No NET Strongly Somewhat NET Somewhat Strongly opinion 10/19/20 VA RV 41 30 11 57 7 50 2 9/30/19 VA RV 40 27 12 58 6 52 3 10/29/17 VA RV 36 24 12 60 10 50 5 10/2/17 VA RV 34 20 14 60 10 50 6 5/14/17 VA RV 36 21 15 60 7 53 4 11. (ASK IF REGISTERED TO VOTE)Do you approve or disapprove of the way Ralph Northam is handling his job as governor of Virginia? Do you approve/disapprove strongly or somewhat? -------- Approve -------- ------ Disapprove ------- No NET Strongly Somewhat NET Somewhat Strongly opinion 10/19/20 VA RV 56 27 29 38 9 29 6 9/30/19 VA RV 49 16 33 31 12 17 23 9/30/19 VA 47 15 32 29 12 17 23 2/8/19 VA RV 43 20 23 45 15 31 12 2/8/19 VA 43 18 24 44 15 30 13 Compare to: Terry McAuliffe: -------- Approve ------- ------- Disapprove ------ No NET Strongly Somewhat NET Somewhat Strongly opinion 5/14/17 49 19 30 25 11 14 26 8/14/16 53 22 31 31 13 18 16 Bob McDonnell: -------- Approve -------- ------- Disapprove ------ No NET Strongly Somewhat NET Somewhat Strongly opinion 9/22/13 RV 49 13 36 39 22 17 11 5/2/13 RV 64 19 44 27 14 13 9 9/16/12 RV 58 24 34 27 13 14 15 5/2/12 RV 58 18 40 36 19 16 7 3 5/4/11 RV 64 23 41 26 12 13 11 Tim Kaine: -------- Approve -------- ------- Disapprove ------ No NET Strongly Somewhat NET Somewhat Strongly opinion 5/4/11* 58 24 34 30 14 15 12 10/25/09 LV 58 23 35 38 17 21 4 10/7/09 LV 60 25 36 37 19 19 2 9/17/09 LV 59 27 33 38 17 22 2 8/14/09 56 21 34 36 18 18 8 9/21/08 RV 66 NA NA 25 NA NA 9 10/8/07 All 63 25 12 10/12/06 LV 77 19 4 *2011: Thinking back to when Tim Kaine was governor, would say you approve or disapprove of the way Kaine handled his job as governor? Mark Warner: -------- Approve -------- ------- Disapprove ------ No NET Strongly Somewhat NET Somewhat Strongly opinion 10/26/05 LV 80 NA NA 17 NA NA 3 9/9/05 RV 76 NA NA 22 NA NA 2 Jim Gilmore: ---------Approve--------- --------Disapprove------ No NET Strongly Somewhat NET Strongly Somewhat opinion 10/25/01 LV 62 25 37 33 18 16 5 8/23/01 RV 57 NA NA 36 NA NA 7 8/27/00 RV 70 25 45 20 8 12 10 George Allen: ---------Approve--------- --------Disapprove------- No NET Strongly Somewhat NET Somewhat Strongly opinion 10/21/97 66 NA NA 27 NA NA 6 9/16/97 RV 67 NA NA 26 NA NA 7 12. (ASK IF REGISTERED TO VOTE) Do you approve or disapprove of the way Northam is handling the coronavirus outbreak? Approve Disapprove No opinion 10/19/20 VA 64 32 4 13. (ASK IF REGISTERED TO VOTE) How do you feel about the possibility that you or someone in your immediate family might catch the coronavirus – very worried, somewhat worried, not too worried, or not worried at all? Already ---- Worried ----- ------ Not worried ------- caught No NET Very Smwht NET Not too Not at all it (vol.) op. 10/19/20 VA 65 27 38 30 18 12 5 * 14. (ASK IF REGISTERED TO VOTE) Considering the coronavirus situation, do you think Virginia’s current restrictions on businesses and public gatherings are (too strict), (not strict enough), or about right? Too Not strict About No strict enough right opinion 4 10/19/20 VA 21 25 53 1 15. (ASK IF REGISTERED TO VOTE) Do you think most people in your community are taking social distancing and mask-wearing (too seriously), (not seriously enough), or are most people striking the right balance? Taking it Not seriously Striking the No too seriously enough right balance opinion 10/19/20 VA 8 36 55 1 16. (ASK IF REGISTERED TO VOTE) Do you support or oppose requiring all public schools in Virginia to open for in-person classes five days a week? Support Oppose No opinion 10/19/20 VA 35 59 6 Party ID.
Recommended publications
  • February 2016

    February 2016

    Indiana is at the crossroads to your genealogy past. Visit Our Website Indiana News - February 2016 Welcome to the February 2016 edition of Indiana News! This e-mail is sent out once a month to members of the Indiana Genealogical Society, as well as to the public who sign up to receive it. It focuses on aspects of Indiana genealogy and history. Past issues going back to 2010 are available in PDF format. In this issue, read all about our April 16 conference in Fort Wayne, including how you can register. There's also information about another passing in the Indiana genealogy world, some Indiana Methodist Church records being added to Ancestry.com, and an explanation of the George Rogers Clark land grant in Indiana. Registration open for IGS Conference in Fort Wayne Registration is open for the Indiana Genealogical Society's annual conference on Saturday, April 16 at the Allen County Public Library in Fort Wayne. We're fortunate to have not one but two featured speakers - professional researcher Jeanne Jeanne Larzalere Bloom, CG Larzalere Bloom, CG and Jen Baldwin of findmypast - presenting sessions on how to research Jen Baldwin women, do research in urban areas, and effectively use social media, among others. Read the description of all of the conference sessions. Baldwin's sessions are being sponsored by the Allen County Genealogical Society of Indiana and the Doug and Joni Lehman Charitable Foundation. Registration for the conference is $45, with Indiana Genealogical Society members receiving a $10 discount if they register before April 4, 2016. For online registration, you can purchase an Indiana Genealogical Society membership and a discounted conference registration simultaneously ($65 combined).
  • Picking the Vice President

    Picking the Vice President

    Picking the Vice President Elaine C. Kamarck Brookings Institution Press Washington, D.C. Contents Introduction 4 1 The Balancing Model 6 The Vice Presidency as an “Arranged Marriage” 2 Breaking the Mold 14 From Arranged Marriages to Love Matches 3 The Partnership Model in Action 20 Al Gore Dick Cheney Joe Biden 4 Conclusion 33 Copyright 36 Introduction Throughout history, the vice president has been a pretty forlorn character, not unlike the fictional vice president Julia Louis-Dreyfus plays in the HBO seriesVEEP . In the first episode, Vice President Selina Meyer keeps asking her secretary whether the president has called. He hasn’t. She then walks into a U.S. senator’s office and asks of her old colleague, “What have I been missing here?” Without looking up from her computer, the senator responds, “Power.” Until recently, vice presidents were not very interesting nor was the relationship between presidents and their vice presidents very consequential—and for good reason. Historically, vice presidents have been understudies, have often been disliked or even despised by the president they served, and have been used by political parties, derided by journalists, and ridiculed by the public. The job of vice president has been so peripheral that VPs themselves have even made fun of the office. That’s because from the beginning of the nineteenth century until the last decade of the twentieth century, most vice presidents were chosen to “balance” the ticket. The balance in question could be geographic—a northern presidential candidate like John F. Kennedy of Massachusetts picked a southerner like Lyndon B.
  • ("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7

    ("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7

    COMPLAINT BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION CBHMISSIOAl INTRODUCTXON - 1 The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee ("DSCC") 7-_. J _j. c files this complaint seeking an immediate investigation by the 7 c; a > Federal Election Commission into the illegal spending A* practices of the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee (WRSCIt). As the public record shows, and an investigation will confirm, the NRSC and a series of ostensibly nonprofit, nonpartisan groups have undertaken a significant and sustained effort to funnel "soft money101 into federal elections in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended or "the Act"), 2 U.S.C. 5s 431 et seq., and the Federal Election Commission (peFECt)Regulations, 11 C.F.R. 85 100.1 & sea. 'The term "aoft money" as ueed in this Complaint means funds,that would not be lawful for use in connection with any federal election (e.g., corporate or labor organization treasury funds, contributions in excess of the relevant contribution limit for federal elections). THE FACTS IN TBIS CABE On November 24, 1992, the state of Georgia held a unique runoff election for the office of United States Senator. Georgia law provided for a runoff if no candidate in the regularly scheduled November 3 general election received in excess of 50 percent of the vote. The 1992 runoff in Georg a was a hotly contested race between the Democratic incumbent Wyche Fowler, and his Republican opponent, Paul Coverdell. The Republicans presented this election as a %ust-win81 election. Exhibit 1. The Republicans were so intent on victory that Senator Dole announced he was willing to give up his seat on the Senate Agriculture Committee for Coverdell, if necessary.
  • Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters SUPRC Field

    Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters SUPRC Field

    Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters AREA N= 600 100% DC Area ........................................ 1 ( 1/ 98) 164 27% West ........................................... 2 51 9% Piedmont Valley ................................ 3 134 22% Richmond South ................................. 4 104 17% East ........................................... 5 147 25% START Hello, my name is __________ and I am conducting a survey for Suffolk University and I would like to get your opinions on some political questions. We are calling Virginia households statewide. Would you be willing to spend three minutes answering some brief questions? <ROTATE> or someone in that household). N= 600 100% Continue ....................................... 1 ( 1/105) 600 100% GEND RECORD GENDER N= 600 100% Male ........................................... 1 ( 1/106) 275 46% Female ......................................... 2 325 54% S2 S2. Thank You. How likely are you to vote in the Presidential Election on November 4th? N= 600 100% Very likely .................................... 1 ( 1/107) 583 97% Somewhat likely ................................ 2 17 3% Not very/Not at all likely ..................... 3 0 0% Other/Undecided/Refused ........................ 4 0 0% Q1 Q1. Which political party do you feel closest to - Democrat, Republican, or Independent? N= 600 100% Democrat ....................................... 1 ( 1/110) 269 45% Republican ..................................... 2 188 31% Independent/Unaffiliated/Other ................. 3 141 24% Not registered
  • Civil Defense and Homeland Security: a Short History of National Preparedness Efforts

    Civil Defense and Homeland Security: a Short History of National Preparedness Efforts

    Civil Defense and Homeland Security: A Short History of National Preparedness Efforts September 2006 Homeland Security National Preparedness Task Force 1 Civil Defense and Homeland Security: A Short History of National Preparedness Efforts September 2006 Homeland Security National Preparedness Task Force 2 ABOUT THIS REPORT This report is the result of a requirement by the Director of the Department of Homeland Security’s National Preparedness Task Force to examine the history of national preparedness efforts in the United States. The report provides a concise and accessible historical overview of U.S. national preparedness efforts since World War I, identifying and analyzing key policy efforts, drivers of change, and lessons learned. While the report provides much critical information, it is not meant to be a substitute for more comprehensive historical and analytical treatments. It is hoped that the report will be an informative and useful resource for policymakers, those individuals interested in the history of what is today known as homeland security, and homeland security stakeholders responsible for the development and implementation of effective national preparedness policies and programs. 3 Introduction the Nation’s diverse communities, be carefully planned, capable of quickly providing From the air raid warning and plane spotting pertinent information to the populace about activities of the Office of Civil Defense in the imminent threats, and able to convey risk 1940s, to the Duck and Cover film strips and without creating unnecessary alarm. backyard shelters of the 1950s, to today’s all- hazards preparedness programs led by the The following narrative identifies some of the Department of Homeland Security, Federal key trends, drivers of change, and lessons strategies to enhance the nation’s learned in the history of U.S.
  • Pence Timeline: Legislature, Then 2016

    Pence Timeline: Legislature, Then 2016

    V20, N8 Thursday Oct. 2, 2014 Pence timeline: Legislature, then 2016 Gov. Pence at a forum at Governor planning reelect, but the Aurora City Hall before taking a selfie with a will weigh all options next May constituent. (HPI Photo by By BRIAN A. HOWEY Brian A. Howey) MADISON, Ind. – The $1 billion question on the minds of Hoosier pundits and voters is whether April 30. Senior Pence political advisers tell HPI that will be Gov. Mike Pence will seek a presidential nomination in the point when Pence sits down with his family and inner 2016. circle and surveys the political landscape both in Indiana and the U.S. The answer, my friends, won’t be blowin’ in the wind until after the Indiana General Assembly sine die next Continued on page 3 Delegation & leadership By BRIAN A. HOWEY WASHINGTON – The two Democrats in the In- diana congressional delegation sounded what could be perceived as alarm. U.S. Rep. André Carson characterized members of Congress as a collection of “nar- “Here’s the issue. Our elections cissists,” a charge sometimes leveled at journalists. A few here in Indiana need to be better, minutes later, delegation dean and they need to work better for U.S. Rep. Pete Visclosky talked of the new routine of funding the people of Indiana.” the government. “Continuing resolutions are a sign of failure,” - Beth White, Democratic Visclosky resolutely stated. secretary of state nomi- These observations, made at a recent Indiana Chamber nee Fly-In event at the U.S. Capitol Visitor Center that included both Page 2 is a non-partisan newslet- ter based in Indianapolis and Nashville, Ind.
  • Getting Ready for Health Reform 2020: What Past Presidential Campaigns Can Teach Us

    Getting Ready for Health Reform 2020: What Past Presidential Campaigns Can Teach Us

    REPORT JUNE 2018 Getting Ready for Health Reform 2020: What Past Presidential Campaigns Can Teach Us Jeanne M. Lambrew Senior Fellow The Century Foundation ABSTRACT KEY TAKEAWAYS ISSUE: The candidates for the 2020 presidential election are likely to Campaign plans are used by emerge within a year, along with their campaign plans. Such plans will supporters and the press to hold presidents accountable. Though include, if not feature, health policy proposals, given this issue’s general voters are unlikely to believe that significance as well as the ongoing debate over the Affordable Care Act. politicians keep their promises, GOAL: To explain why campaign plans matter, review the health policy roughly two-thirds of campaign components of past presidential campaign platforms, and discuss the promises were kept by presidents likely 2020 campaign health reform plans. from 1968 through the Obama years. METHODS: Review of relevant reports, data, party platforms, and policy documents. Health policy will likely play FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Proposals related to health care have a significant role in the 2020 grown in scope in both parties’ presidential platforms over the past election, with Republicans focused on deregulation and century and affect both agendas and assessments of a president’s capped federal financing success. Continued controversy over the Affordable Care Act, potential and Democrats backing the reversals in gains in coverage and affordability, and voters’ concern Affordable Care Act and a suggest a central role for health policy in the 2020 election. Republicans Medicare-based public plan will most likely continue to advance devolution, deregulation, and option. capped federal financing, while Democrats will likely overlay their support of the Affordable Care Act with some type of Medicare-based public plan option.
  • **** This Is an EXTERNAL Email. Exercise Caution. DO NOT Open Attachments Or Click Links from Unknown Senders Or Unexpected Email

    **** This Is an EXTERNAL Email. Exercise Caution. DO NOT Open Attachments Or Click Links from Unknown Senders Or Unexpected Email

    Scott.A.Milkey From: Hudson, MK <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 3:23 PM To: Powell, David N;Landis, Larry (llandis@ );candacebacker@ ;Miller, Daniel R;Cozad, Sara;McCaffrey, Steve;Moore, Kevin B;[email protected];Mason, Derrick;Creason, Steve;Light, Matt ([email protected]);Steuerwald, Greg;Trent Glass;Brady, Linda;Murtaugh, David;Seigel, Jane;Lanham, Julie (COA);Lemmon, Bruce;Spitzer, Mark;Cunningham, Chris;McCoy, Cindy;[email protected];Weber, Jennifer;Bauer, Jenny;Goodman, Michelle;Bergacs, Jamie;Hensley, Angie;Long, Chad;Haver, Diane;Thompson, Lisa;Williams, Dave;Chad Lewis;[email protected];Andrew Cullen;David, Steven;Knox, Sandy;Luce, Steve;Karns, Allison;Hill, John (GOV);Mimi Carter;Smith, Connie S;Hensley, Angie;Mains, Diane;Dolan, Kathryn Subject: Indiana EBDM - June 22, 2016 Meeting Agenda Attachments: June 22, 2016 Agenda.docx; Indiana Collaborates to Improve Its Justice System.docx **** This is an EXTERNAL email. Exercise caution. DO NOT open attachments or click links from unknown senders or unexpected email. **** Dear Indiana EBDM team members – A reminder that the Indiana EBDM Policy Team is scheduled to meet this Wednesday, June 22 from 9:00 am – 4:00 pm at IJC. At your earliest convenience, please let me know if you plan to attend the meeting. Attached is the meeting agenda. Please note that we have a full agenda as this is the team’s final Phase V meeting. We have much to discuss as we prepare the state’s application for Phase VI. We will serve box lunches at about noon so we can make the most of our time together.
  • The Economist/Yougov Poll

    The Economist/Yougov Poll

    The Economist/YouGov Poll Sample 2000 General Population Respondents Conducted July 31 - August 4, 2015 Margin of Error ±2.9% 1. Some people seem to follow what’s going on in government and public affairs most of the time, whether there’s an election going on or not. Others aren’t that interested. Would you say you follow what’s going on in government and public affairs ... ? Most of the time . 45% Some of the time . 32% Only now and then . .13% Hardly at all . 9% Don’t know . .1% 2. Would you say things in this country today are... Generally headed in the right direction . 30% Off on the wrong track . 56% Not sure . 14% 3. Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following people? Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Don’t favorable favorable unfavorable unfavorable know Joe Biden 14% 27% 15% 26% 17% Lincoln Chafee 2% 10% 12% 14% 62% Hillary Clinton 21% 23% 10% 39% 7% Martin O’Malley 3% 13% 14% 14% 56% Bernie Sanders 15% 15% 14% 21% 36% Jim Webb 3% 13% 14% 11% 58% 1 The Economist/YouGov Poll 4. Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following people? Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Don’t favorable favorable unfavorable unfavorable know Jeb Bush 9% 25% 21% 28% 17% Ben Carson 14% 18% 12% 16% 40% Chris Christie 6% 22% 24% 27% 22% Ted Cruz 11% 20% 14% 26% 29% Carly Fiorina 9% 16% 12% 17% 45% Jim Gilmore 3% 8% 11% 12% 66% Lindsey Graham 4% 16% 19% 22% 39% Mike Huckabee 9% 22% 18% 25% 26% Bobby Jindal 7% 18% 14% 21% 40% John Kasich 6% 14% 13% 13% 53% George Pataki 2% 14% 17% 15% 52% Rand Paul 8% 26% 20% 19% 28% Rick Perry 7% 23% 15% 25% 30% Marco Rubio 11% 23% 15% 21% 30% Rick Santorum 6% 20% 16% 25% 33% Donald Trump 20% 16% 11% 44% 8% Scott Walker 14% 16% 10% 22% 37% 5.
  • The Economist/Yougov Poll

    The Economist/Yougov Poll

    The Economist/YouGov Poll Sample 2000 General Population Respondents Conducted October 23 - 27, 2015 Margin of Error ±3% 1. Some people seem to follow what’s going on in government and public affairs most of the time, whether there’s an election going on or not. Others aren’t that interested. Would you say you follow what’s going on in government and public affairs ... ? Most of the time . 48% Some of the time . 30% Only now and then . .13% Hardly at all . 9% Don’t know . .1% 2. Would you say things in this country today are... Generally headed in the right direction . 27% Off on the wrong track . 62% Not sure . 11% 3. Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following people? Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Don’t favorable favorable unfavorable unfavorable know Hillary Clinton 21% 21% 12% 39% 7% Lawrence Lessig 2% 7% 11% 12% 68% Martin O’Malley 2% 15% 16% 16% 51% Bernie Sanders 18% 24% 15% 22% 22% 4. How liberal or conservative are the Democrats listed below? Respondent placed item on scale from 0 - "Very Liberal" to 100 - "Very Conservative". Hillary Clinton . .28 Lawrence Lessig . .33 Martin O’Malley . 33 Bernie Sanders . 24 1 The Economist/YouGov Poll 5. The percentage of respondents who selected ’not sure’ about the comparative ideology of the listed politicians. Rated candidate Not sure Hillary Clinton 89% 11% Lawrence Lessig 40% 60% Martin O’Malley 54% 46% Bernie Sanders 82% 18% 6. If you had to choose one, which one of these individuals would you want to be the Democratic nominee for president in 2016? Asked of registered voters who identify as Democrats Hillary Clinton .
  • 2016 General Write-In Results

    2016 General Write-In Results

    2016 General Election Official Write-In Results Precinct Precinct Name Office Candidate Votes Number ATTORNEY 01 BELLEFONTE N N/A 1 GENERAL AUDITOR 01 BELLEFONTE N N/A 1 GENERAL 01 BELLEFONTE N CONGRESS BLANK 1 01 BELLEFONTE N CONGRESS N/A 1 GENERAL 01 BELLEFONTE N ASSEMBLY - N/A 1 171ST 01 BELLEFONTE N PRESIDENT EVAN MCMULLIN 1 01 BELLEFONTE N PRESIDENT TILL KINGDOM COME (JESUS) 1 STATE 01 BELLEFONTE N N/A 1 TREASURER 01 BELLEFONTE N US SENATOR N/A 1 ATTORNEY 02 BELLEFONTE NE RON PAUL 1 GENERAL ATTORNEY 02 BELLEFONTE NE THOMAS SCHWARTZ 1 GENERAL GENERAL 02 BELLEFONTE NE ASSEMBLY - GERALD M. REITZ 2 171ST 02 BELLEFONTE NE PRESIDENT BERNIE SANDERS 1 02 BELLEFONTE NE PRESIDENT EVAN MCMULLIN 6 02 BELLEFONTE NE PRESIDENT TED CRUS 2 STATE 02 BELLEFONTE NE MICHAEL SNYDER 1 TREASURER ATTORNEY 03 BELLEFONTE S BLANK 1 GENERAL 03 BELLEFONTE S CONGRESS BRIAN SHOOK 1 03 BELLEFONTE S PRESIDENT BERNIE SANDERS 3 03 BELLEFONTE S PRESIDENT LYNN TAYLOR 1 03 BELLEFONTE S PRESIDENT MATTHEW J. TAYLOR 1 03 BELLEFONTE S PRESIDENT RAND PAUL 1 03 BELLEFONTE S PRESIDENT WILL MCMULLIN 1 ATTORNEY 04 BELLEFONTE SE JORDAN D. DEVIER 1 GENERAL 04 BELLEFONTE SE CONGRESS JORDAN D. DEVIER 1 04 BELLEFONTE SE PRESIDENT BERNIE SANDERS 1 04 BELLEFONTE SE PRESIDENT BURNEY SANDERS/MICHELLE OBAMA 1 04 BELLEFONTE SE PRESIDENT DR. BEN CARSON 1 04 BELLEFONTE SE PRESIDENT ELEMER FUDD 1 04 BELLEFONTE SE PRESIDENT EVAN MCMULLAN 1 04 BELLEFONTE SE PRESIDENT EVAN MCMULLIN 2 04 BELLEFONTE SE PRESIDENT JIMMY CARTER/GEORGE M.W.
  • The Economist/Yougov Poll List of Tables

    The Economist/Yougov Poll List of Tables

    The Economist/YouGov Poll January 27 - 30, 2016 List of Tables 1. Interest in news and public affairs.....................................................................2 2. Direction of country.............................................................................3 3. Favorability of Democratic Presidential Candidates – Hillary Clinton...................................................4 4. Favorability of Democratic Presidential Candidates – Martin O’Malley..................................................5 5. Favorability of Democratic Presidential Candidates – Bernie Sanders..................................................6 6. Preferred Democratic Nominee for President...............................................................7 7. Enthusiasm - Democratic Candidates...................................................................8 8. Satisfaction - Democratic Field.......................................................................9 9. Iowa Caucus Winner - Democrats..................................................................... 10 10. NH Primary Winner - Democrats..................................................................... 11 11. Most Likely Democratic Nominee for President.............................................................. 12 12. Could Win General - Democrats – Hillary Clinton............................................................ 13 13. Could Win General - Democrats – Martin O’Malley........................................................... 14 14. Could Win General - Democrats – Bernie