The Application of Beneficial Ownership in Asset- Based Sukuk: a Shariñah Analysis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law (MJSL) Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law Vol.3 | December 2015 | pp.1-26 THE APPLICATION OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP IN ASSET- BASED SUKUK: A SHARIÑAH ANALYSIS Mohamad Zaharuddin Zakaria Senior Lecturer Faculty of Syariah and Law | Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia [email protected] Ahmad Zaki Salleh Senior Lecturer Faculty of Syariah and Law | Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia [email protected] Akhtar Zaity Abdul Aziz Assistant Professor Department of Fiqh and Usul al-Fiqh | International Islamic University Malaysia [email protected] ABSTRACT There are two categories of sukuk namely Asset-based and Asset-backed sukuk. Assed-based sukuk is a sukuk whereby the existence of an underlying asset is sold to the investors only to facilitate the issuance of sukuk. Whereas in asset-backed sukuk, the asset is not merely used as a tool to facilitate the issuance but it is really transferred to the investor via a true sale transaction. However, in asset-based sukuk issuance, the transfer of asset to the investor is not a true sale. In simple word, only beneficial ownership is transferred to the investor while the legal title remains with the originator. The practice is seemed not to be persistent with the Shariah principle that requires the complete transfer of ownership to the buyer. In Islamic law, the ownership will determine the obligation of the owner toward his property. For example, a lessor is liable for the impairment of his property because he is the legal owner of the property while the lessee is not responsible for it because the lessee only owns the beneficial right of the property. Hence, this study is very important to determine the status of the transfer of beneficial ownership in asset-based sukuk whether it is compliant with Shariah or not? The status is vital because the result will lead to the different consequences especially with regard to the sukuk holder whether he is liable for the underlying asset or not. Keywords: Islamic Capital Market, Sukuk, Shariah, Muamalat. The earlier version of this paper was presented at the Islamic Banking, Accounting and Finance Conference (IBAF) 2012 organized by the Faculty of Economy and Muamalat, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM) which was held at the Faculty of Economy and Muamalat, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Bandar Baru Nilai, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia on 2nd–3rd October, 2012. © Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia Negeri Sembilan | Malaysia | www.usim.edu.my Beneficial Owneship In Asset-Based Sukuk 1. BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP IN ASSET-BASED SUKUK Sukuk is an investment certificate that represent the ownership of the sukuk holders in proportion to their share in the underlying assets. AAOIFI defined sukuk as“certificates of equal value representing undivided shares in ownership of tangible asset, usufructs, and services, asset of particular project or special investment activity.”1 Whereby according to IFSB, sukuk is “certificates that represent the holder’s proportionate ownership in an undivided part of an underlying asset where the holder assumes all rights and obligations to such asset”2 Hence, by subscribing such investment certificate, subsequently, the ownership of the underlying asset will be transferred accordingly to the subscribers. However, in the real practice especially in asset-based sukuk, only beneficial ownership is transferred to the subscribers whereby in contrast, the full ownership includes legal title and beneficial interest are transferred to them in the asset-backed sukuk. The different type of ownership is a result of the different mode of ownership transfer in the sukuk issuance whereby in asset-backed sukuk, the transfer is done via a true sale transaction that requires the full transfer of ownership to the buyer. In contrast, in asset-based sukuk, the transfer is not a complete transfer whereby only the beneficial ownership is transfer to the subscribers while the legal title remains with the originator or the seller. The full ownership gives the sukuk holders a full control on the underlying asset especially during the event of default since they are the legal owner of the asset. The creditors cannot claw back the asset and put it in the bankruptcy estates of the originator thus the income generated from the asset will not be affected. On the other hand, the beneficial ownership cannot prevent any action taken by the creditors to claw back the asset since the beneficial owner does not attain the legal title of the underlying asset. Hence, the sukuk holder cannot prevent such action because as a beneficial owner, he has no rights to hold the asset since he is not the legal owner according to the common law even though the sukuk holder has bought the asset through a sharicah compliant transaction. Some scholars did not see the practice in asset-based sukuk as Sharicah compliant and some others claimed that the transaction is fictitious which tantamount to deception and fraud.3 It was claimed that the Sharicah contract only used to facilitate the issuance of sukuk and in that case, the sukuk holders only entitle for the 1 AAOIFI. Accounting and Auiting Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions's Sharicah Standards. (Bahrain: AAOIFI. 2008) http://www.aaoifi.com (accessed on 20th July 2012). 2 IFSB. Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB)'s Capital Adequacy Standard for Institutions (Other than Insurance Institutions) Offering Only Islamic Financial Services. (Kuala Lumpur: IFSB, 2009) p.3 http://www.ifsb.org/standard/ifsb7.pdf (accessed on 5th July 2012). 3 Hussain Hamed Hassan, Comments on Discussion Papers and Notes submitted for Harvard- LSE Workshop on Sukuk, p.4. http://www.iefpedia.com (accessed on 12th June 2012). 2 MJSL | Vol.3 | December 2015 beneficial ownership and not the legal ownership of the asset, even though they have bought the assets.4 Therefore, this study is going see whether Sharicah allows such type of beneficial ownership as applied in the asset-based sukuk and whether the practice is really Sharicah compliant or not. It is very important because the ruling will clarify the status of Asset-based sukuk according to the Sharicah. 2. BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP IN COMMON LAW The application of beneficial ownership must be seen from both legal and Sharicah perspectives. The practice may vary from each perspective to another. According to legal definition of beneficial ownership: “Beneficial ownership is a beneficiary’s interest in trust property.5 It is enjoyed by anyone who has the benefits of ownership of a Security (finance) or property, and yet does not nominally own the asset itself”6 “Beneficiary is a person for whose benefit property is held in trust; esp., one designated to benefit fro an appointment, disposition, or assignment (as in will, insurance policy, ect.) or to receive something as a result of a legal arrangement or instrument.”7 While a beneficial owner is: “Beneficial owner is one recognized in equity as the owner of something because use and title belong to that person, even though legal title may belong to someone else; esp., one for whom property is held in trust” 8 Whereas beneficial interest is: “Beneficial interest is a right or expectancy in something (such as a trust or an estate), as opposed to legal title to that thing, for example, a person with a beneficial interest in a trust receives income from the trust but does not hold legal title to the trust property. 9 From the definition, it is understood that the beneficial ownership is a right of someone to use an asset or to get benefit from it even though he is not the legal owner or holding any legal title of the asset. A beneficial owner does not necessarily own the asset but he has the beneficial right or beneficial interest to enjoy the profit or benefit from the asset. A simple example like in the case when the husband buys a house using the husband’s name but at the same time the wife shares her money to pay the price. In this case, the wife is said to have a beneficial interest in the house even though the husband holds the legal title of the asset. If they get divorced, the wife has right to 4 Sacid Bouheraoua & Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki. Taqwim Naqdi li al-Qadaya al-Sharciyyah al- Mutacalliqah bi Milkiyyah al-Sukuk al-Qa’imah cala al-‘Usul, the paper presented at the conference al-Sukuk al-Islamiyyah: cArad wa Taqwim organized by University of King cAbdul cAziz, Jeddah, 25th May 2010. p. 11-17. 5 Henry Campbell Black, Black’s Law Dictionary, edited by Bryan A. Garner. (US: Thomson Reuters, 9th ed. 2009) p.1215. 6 The Free Dictionary. http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com (assessed on 3rd April 2012). 7 Black’s Law Dictionary, p.176. 8 Black’s Law Dictionary, p. 1214 9 Black’s Law Dictionary, p.885 3 Beneficial Owneship In Asset-Based Sukuk claim part of the value of the house because she has the beneficial interest in the house due to her share in purchasing the house.10 Another example may be seen in the purchase of a car via a financial institution or bank. The bank will hold the legal title of the asset until the buyer fully pays the price while the buyer holds the beneficial right to use the car in whatever manner he wants. The bank is not responsible for any liability caused by the car or the buyer. The bank even does not bother what will happen to the car but in the case of default, the bank will possess back the car to cover any loss from the default.11 That’s why we have seen many traffic summonses were imposed to the beneficial owner and not to the bank because the beneficial owner is the one who has interest and control over the car.