DOCSLIB.ORG

Foyer Essentials Part 2: Accommodation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Foyer Essentials Part 2: Accommodation FOYER TOOLKIT #5 www.homelesshub.ca PART 2 Foyer Essentials ACCOMODATION of the key considerations in establishing ONE a Foyer is deciding what kind of accommodation will be provided: a fixed site with multiple rooms and a common area: a dispersed housing model with individual apartments, or small clusters of rooms with shared space? There are many options, and these carry Aberdeen Foyer, Marywell Training Centre. different considerations in terms of capital and operating http://grampianpropertynetwork.org.uk/about-us/our-venue/ expenses. In addition, the built form of the Foyer has implications for the delivery of services and supports. What forms of The good news is that in developing a new Foyer, one has housing are most the unique opportunity to build on what has clearly been appropriate? demonstrated to be an effective model, and to adapt what International research identifies that has been more broadly learned about the full range of there is much flexibility in terms of the physical form that Foyers can take. housing options for youth. There is no single type of facility In fact, the Foyer can be adapted to associated with the Foyer; they come in all shapes and incorporate different forms of housing, sizes. including a dedicated youth housing facility on one hand, or dispersed housing (potentially including scattered But accommodation is about much more than shape and site approaches) on the other. There are size. The quality of accommodation is also really important benefits to both models, and in thinking about establishing a Foyer, they should to consider. Often, there is an attitude on the part of not be considered mutually exclusive. funders and the public that ‘beggars can’t be choosers’, and that young people who are homelessness should be satisfied with the bare minimum of accommodation. T his Dedicated youth goes against a core belief that underlies the Foyer model housing facility and more progressive approaches to youth development. Dedicated facilities, also known as The Foyer should be more than a bare bones shelter; it ‘stand-alone’ or congregate living should be a safe and a decent place to live. environments (though not to be confused with congregate shelter environments, where many people “Go smaller, fight for the money, make them nice places to be. sleep in the same room) may be more Don’t make them austere. Don’t have a bare mattress. Make appropriate for youth who are younger, it look nice. Invest in living space, good quality furniture, nice less independent, have higher needs for flooring, everything that makes it nice. These poor kids are support and / or need help with social coming from horrible places often, so make it nice for them.” interaction. Dedicated facilities have (Narelle Clay, Chairperson, Homelessness Australia1). the advantage of centralizing staff and program resources, easily accessible program space, and the ability to In this section, we will review a range of potential options nurture and support community for accommodation that respect the principles of the Foyer. building. For high needs clients where security and access to around the clock supports is important, this may be a preferable option. Reports on the implementation of Foy- ers in Australia concluded that “good design is essential for the building to be attractive, practical, secure, and cost and environmentally efficient to operate” and that successful Foyer buildings include “well-planned offices for support staff, Southern Youth and Family Services (Australia) www.syfs.org.au training rooms and space for tenant part- ners”2. Innovative Canadian transitional housing projects for youth, such as Eva’s Dispersed Housing Phoenix in Toronto and the Lilly Build- ing run by Choices for Youth in St. John’s Dispersed housing has been used in tran- ticularly attractive to young people leav- demonstrate how to combine innova- sitional housing models as an alternative ing group homes or juvenile detention tive living accommodations with com- to the dedicated youth housing facility, facilities. Second, support for sub-pop- mon spaces, services and training space and is seen as more advantageous for ulations (young women, LGBTQ youth) in renovated settings. Jeff Karabanow, young people who are older and / or can be more easily accommodated with a leading Canadian scholar on youth who are able to live more independently. a decentralized housing model. Third, * homelessness, suggests that transitions Dispersed and scattered site housing the number of youth who can be accom- out of homelessness may be facilitated provides a great deal of flexibility in modated is much more elastic, and is by having such housing facilities at a dis- terms of differentiated accommodation, not limited by the number of rooms in a tance from mainstream youth services as more so than fixed site models. Single dedicated housing facility. Fourth, in the this may make it easier for street involved room or multiple room apartments can case of a scattered site approach, costs youth to disconnect from the lifestyle.3 be used, as well as houses. for capital, administration and mainte- nance may be reduced and shifted to the While dispersed housing models have private sector, making the model more Blended model: become common, particularly in the cost effective (though support costs may wake of the success of Housing First, be higher because clients are dispersed). Hub and Spoke there is no reason to believe that this ap- Some interesting innovations have re- proach cannot also work with Foyers. In Finally, and this is perhaps the key bene- sulted from blending the two models fact, the Foyer model has been adapted fit, length of tenure becomes much more of accommodation. A blended model to include dispersed accommodation in flexible. With a scattered site model that might include a main or central dedi- both the UK4 and Australia5. houses people in private market housing, cated facility with multiple residential lease conversion is then possible, mak- units, communal space, and administra- There are many advantages to the dis- ing the transition to independent living tive space. Residents who are young, in- persed Foyer model. First, because it is much more fluid. Long-term tenancy is experienced or have higher needs would not associated with a single facility, it can therefore possible through the Foyer and be better suited for this centralized facil- feel less like a ‘program’ or an institutional young people are supported to live inde- ity. At the same time, this central facility setting for residents. This may be par- pendently in permanent housing. could be augmented with a number of dis- One complicating feature of this ap- persed units, allowing proach, however, is that it means adapt- older youth who are ing the model to ensure that some of the more independent or key supports and program components, who are averse to the such as communal space, life skills, edu- more institutional con- cational supports and the nurturing of text the opportunity positive relationships, are still imple- to live in smaller units mented and supported in an effective that are integrated into manner. Southern Youth and Family Services (Australia) the community. www.syfs.org.au * Dispersed housing is often distinguished from scattered site models because while in both cases the units are smaller (housing fewer residents in one place) and located over a wider area, the units are owned by the provider. Scattered site housing typically refers to units rented from the private sector, which can allow greater flexibility and lowers capital investment. READ MORE #10 Live, learn, grow: Supporting Transitions to Adulthood for Homeless Youth A FRAMEWORK FOR The importance THE FOYER IN CANADA of Communal Space Stephen Gaetz & Fiona Scott READ THE FULL REPORT Whether the Foyer uses a dedicated youth can often feel isolated. By housing facility or a scattered site providing space, youth can gather approach, it is considered important to exchange information and TOOLKITS for youth to have safe spaces to experiences, get support from peers, #1 What is a Foyer? gather, talk, and engage in activities and essentially learn effective ways of #2 The Foyer and Transitions to Adulthood together. Without communal spaces, communicating. #3 The Philosophy and Principles of the Foyer #4 Foyer Essentials Part 1: The Program #6 Foyer Essentials QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS: Part 3: Organizational Framework #7 Foyer Case Studies 1) What model best suits your target 5) A dispersed model has its population? Based on age or strengths. In going down that #8 Resources from the Foyer Federation (UK) other demographic factors, and road, you will need to consider: the developmental assets of resi- dents, what model makes sense? • The need for a system of References roving supports, and 24 1. Quotation from a conference presentation at 2) How will an inclusive and safe hour on call care. the CHRA Congress, St. Johns Newfoundland, environment be supported by May 4, 2012 the model you choose? How will • Is there adequate and affordable supply 2. Malycha, W. (n.d.). Foyers – International the dignity, safety and security learning and relevance to Australia. Presentation of women, LGBTQ and racial of rental housing to at the Anglicare WA Youth Homelessness Forum. minority youth be respected enable a ‘scattered site’ Retrieved from www.stjohnsyouthservices. approach? org.au/documents/FOYERWAPresentation- within the housing model you WendyMalycha.pdf choose? What is the range of • What are the challenges 3. Karabanow, J. (2004). Being young and ages that can be supported? of recruiting, negotiating homeless: Understanding how youth enter 3) How will the model you and supporting and exit street life. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing. choose assist with community landlords? engagement, building healthy • What kind of plan do you Karabanow, J. (2008). Getting off the Street: social relationships, and Exploring the Processes of Young People’s Street need to have in place in Exits.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wesley Youth Housing: the Outcomes of Hamilton’S Application of a Youth Foyer Approach by Dr
    WESLEY YOUTH HOUSING: THE OUTCOMES OF HAMILTON’S APPLICATION OF A YOUTH FOYER APPROACH BY DR. JULIA WOODHALL-MELNIK ©copyright 2019 1 | Page Wesley Youth Housing: The outcomes of Hamilton’s application of a Youth Foyer approach A Community-Based Report Prepared for February, 2019 by Dr. Julia Woodhall-Melnik of Woodhall- Melnik Research & Professional Services and the University of New Brunswick in Saint John 2 | Page DISCLAIMER The quantitative data presented in this report were collected and recorded by staff at Wesley Youth Housing. The data were provided to Woodhall-Melnik Research & Professional Services (WMRPS) by management at Wesley Youth Housing. The qualitative data were collected by WMRPS. The lead researcher and owner of WMRPS, Dr. Julia Woodhall-Melnik, analyzed all data and provided interpretations of the data. The views in this document are those of WMRPS and may not necessarily reflect those of the Wesley Youth Housing, its funders or Wesley Urban Ministries. For inquiries, please contact: [email protected]. 3 | Page REPORT HIGHLIGHTS Wesley Youth Housing provides supportive housing to youth who are aged 16 to 21 years. In this report, we first investigated the principles of fidelity for Youth Foyers in Canada. We then used those principles to analyze responses from staff at Wesley Youth Housing to gain a better understanding of which Foyer principles they employ. The main findings of this report are: • Approximately 84% of youth who left or graduated from the program were housed • Approximately 70% of youth who
    [Show full text]
  • How Effective and Evidence Based Is the Youth Foyer Model
    A critical examination of the youth foyer model for alleviating homelessness: Strengthening a promising evidence base Iris Levin, Brotherhood of St Laurence Joseph Borlagdan, Brotherhood of St Laurence and University of Melbourne Shelley Mallett, Brotherhood of St Laurence and University of Melbourne Jehonathan Ben, Brotherhood of St Laurence and Deakin University Corresponding author: [email protected] doi: 10.4225/50/57C4E83D525A7 Abstract This article assesses the quality of 15 primary studies that examined the effectiveness of youth foyer or foyer-like programs on the lives of young homeless people. The youth foyer model provides an integrated approach to tackling youth homelessness, connecting affordable accommodation to training and employment. In Australia, there is growing support from government for the development and funding of foyer programs. However to date, there has been very limited development and investment in the evidence base on the effectiveness of this model in Australia or internationally. Following an extensive literature search, we argue that there is a need to lift the standard of the evidence base of youth foyer effectiveness. We discuss two main issues: the difficulty studies had validating claims of foyer effectiveness, and limitations of research design and methodology. The implications of the lack of rigour in the research reviewed are three-fold. Firstly, youth foyer evaluation study quality could be improved by: clearer methodological and model documentation; post intervention follow-up design; comparison of data to non-randomised comparison groups; and a pre-publication peer-review process. This would be supported with clearer expectations from the research community regarding the production and assessment of grey literature.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CULTURE of HOMELESSNESS: an Ethnographic Study
    THE CULTURE OF HOMELESSNESS: An ethnographic study Megan Honor Ravenhill London School of Economics PhD in Social Policy UMI Number: U615614 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615614 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 I V|£:S H S f <§195 I O I S S 4 -7 ABSTRACT The thesis argues that homelessness is complex and synergical in nature. It discusses the life events and processes that often trigger, protect against and predict the likelihood of someone becoming homeless (and/or roofless). It argues, that people’s routes into homelessness are complex, multiple and interlinked and are the result of biographical, structural and behavioural factors. This complexity increases with the age of the individual and the duration of their rooflessness. The thesis explores the homeless culture as a counter-culture created through people being pushed out of mainstream society. It argues, that what happened to people in the past, created the nature of the homeless culture. Furthermore it is argued that any serious attempt at resettling long-term rough sleepers needs to consider what it is that the homeless culture offers and whether or how this can be replicated within housed society.
    [Show full text]
  • Promising Strategies to End Youth Homelessness
    PROMISING STRATEGIES TO END YOUTH HOMELESSNESS Report to Congress u.s. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families Administration on Children, Youth, and Families Family and Youth Services Bureau Report to Congress on Promising Strategies to End Youth Homelessness A Review of Research Table of Contents I. Introduction 2 The Runaway and Homeless Youth Act 5 Background 6 II. Understanding the Problem 10 Who Are Homeless Youth? 10 Pathways to Homelessness 13 Prevalence ofthe Problem 17 Duration of Homelessness 18 Street Life and Homeless Youth 18 III. Theoretical Perspectives 21 Youth Development Perspectives 21 Ecological-Developmental Perspective on Youth Homelessness 25 Risk Amplification Model 26 Life Cycle Model ofYouth Homelessness 28 IV. Interventions to Prevent Youth Homelessness 29 Preventing Child Abuse and Neglect 30 Reducing Violence and Delinquency Among Juveniles 32 Supporting Successful Transitions to Independent Living 36 V. Interventions to Ameliorate Homelessness 42 Principles for Effective Intervention Practice 43 RHYA Outreach and Gateway Services 45 Sheltering and Stabilizing Homeless Youth 48 Providing Targeted Supportive Services to Homeless Youth 58 VI. Implications for Policy and Program Development 61 Programs and Policy Goals and Options 62 VII. Conclusion 74 Appendix - directory of Federal Agency programs 76 References 83 I. INTRODUCTION Youth homelessness has profound consequences reaching well beyond individual youth and their immediate families. Indeed, negative impacts from
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies to Combat Homelessness
    Strategies to combat homelessness United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat) Nairobi, 2000 This publication has been reproduced without formal editing by the United Nations. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers of boundaries. Reference to names of firms and commercial products and processes does not imply their endorsement by the United Nations, and a failure to mention a particular firm, commercial product or process is not a sign of disapproval. Excerpts from the text may be reproduced without authorisation, on condition that the source is indicated. Cover design: Amrik Kalsi, UNCHS (Habitat), Nairobi Cover photos credits: UNCHS (Habitat), UNICEF and Mark Edwards Printing: UNON Printshop, Nairobi United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat) Nairobi, 2000 HS / 599 / 00 E ISBN 92-1-131458-5 An electronic version of this publication is available for download from the UNCHS (Habitat) web-site by August 2000. The electronic version — in compiled HTML format, allowing complex text searches — requires Microsoft Windows 98 or Microsoft Windows 95 plus Microsoft Internet Explorer (version 4 or later). United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat) publications can be obtained from UNCHS (Habitat)’s Regional Offices or directly from: United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat), Publications Unit, P.O. Box 30030, Nairobi, Kenya Fax: 254-2-604060 E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.unchs.org Preface Within the next few years, and for the first time in human history, more people will live in cities and towns than in rural areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018
    FOYER FOUNDATION – ANNUAL REPORT 2018 1 | 44 FOYER FOUNDATION – ANNUAL REPORT 2018 FOYER FOUNDATION – ANNUAL REPORT 2018 Board Chair Report 2 Our People 22 Our Vision 3 Our Network 24 Partnership with BSL 4 Donor Profiles 26 Our Purpose 8 Our Residents 31 About Foyer 9 Financial Summary 32 Key Statistics 10 Our Board 34 2017 Conference 12 Governance 40 Our Achievements 14 Thank You 42 National Campaign 17 How you can help 43 1 | 44 FOYER FOUNDATION – ANNUAL REPORT 2018 FOYER FOUNDATION – ANNUAL REPORT 2018 2017 – 2018 marked the 10th year of the Our Vision is for all young people formation of the Foyer Foundation in in Australia have the opportunity to Australia. fulfill their potential. BOARD CHAIR REPORT There can be little debate that this 10th the organisation into the future. Finally, I wish to acknowledge Jane year has seen transformative change for It is fundamental to us that we link our Slowey who passed away last October. the organisation. national community of practice with our Jane was the long-standing CEO of the national Foyer accreditation process. Foyer Federation in the UK, a former In August 2017, four organisations, Foyer Foundation Board member and an including the Brotherhood of St We want to be a true learning individual who contributed enormously Laurence, Launch Housing, Anglicare WA organisation. We want local organisations to the creation of the Foyer Foundation and the Grant Family Charitable Trust that operate Foyers to contribute to a in Australia. We remember her very took the critical step to back our working national standards framework for Foyers, fondly in Australia for her wisdom, her capital needs for the next two years.
    [Show full text]
  • Foyer Foundation Overview
    0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Foyer movement has been established in Europe and the UK for over 50 years and has now spread internationally, including in Australia where the Foyer Foundation has assisted in the establishment and development of Youth Foyers since 2008. Foyers provide integrated learning and accommodation for young people who are at risk of or experiencing homelessness with the aim of: reducing the number of young people cycling through the housing and homelessness system increasing the number completing education qualifications and gaining productive employment. While there are programs in both the education and homelessness sectors that seek to support young people experiencing disadvantage with their education or accommodation across Australia, there are almost no fully integrated service models focused on education and employment outcomes. Stable housing in individual, self-contained units – as is provided by Foyers, allows young people to develop critical skills they need to lead fulfilling, independent and productive lives, while still offering a supported, congregate living environment. For young people who are unable to rely on family support in this critical developmental stage, this model provides emotional support and guidance and the opportunity to build foundational skills. Foyers around the world have demonstrated positive outcomes in terms of improved educational attainment, increased employment opportunities and better housing outcomes for young people experiencing homelessness. The Foyer Foundation functions to: Promote the Foyer model as a core offer of the homelessness service system for young people at risk of or experiencing homelessness nationally Support the development of quality Foyers through collaborative partnerships and access to tools and resources to support local Foyer development plans License operators, provide advice and training, and ensure ongoing quality assurance through a robust accreditation scheme Give a voice to alienated young people.
    [Show full text]
  • Foyer Toolkit #1
    FOYER TOOLKIT #1 www.homelesshub.ca What is a Foyer? In adapting the Foyer model to your community, the best place to begin is with a brief overview of what a Foyer is. In this section, you will learn: • A brief history of the Foyer; • What a Foyer is and why it is deemed an effective model of accommodation and support for homeless youth; and • How the Foyer fits in with other housing options for young people. is a well-established model of transitional THE FOYER housing for youth that has been growing in popularity around the world over the past two decades. The term Foyer was coined in France, where a network of “Foyers pour jeunes travailleurs” (hostels for young workers) was created to support a large number of young people who, in search of work, moved to towns and cities following World War II. In the The Chelsea Foyer, New York City, NY early 1990s, the British government introduced the Foyer model in response to high youth unemployment, and the model’s success led to replication throughout the country. The growth and development of the Foyer model in the UK has been supported by the Foyer Federation , which has created a range of resources including guides for those developing foyers, staff support, a quality assurance scheme and accreditation program. Today, Foyers have been adapted and implemented in Europe, Australia and the US to include not only housing and links to employment, but also access to education, training, life skills development and on-going case management support. Focus E15 Foyer London (UK).
    [Show full text]
  • Cork-Foyer-Annual-Report-2016
    YEARSOF PUTTING PEOPLE ANNUAL REPORT 2016 Cork Foyer is a Cork City Council Housing & Community Initiative. 03 Introduction 05 10th Anniversary 06 Statement from the Chair 09 New Announcement 10 Home & Support 15 Fulfillng Potential 22 Springboard to Independence 29 Financial Statement 31 Foyer Management 32 Mission Statement 33 Staff Team INTRODUCTION In the mid -1990’s, and as a measure to cut off an identified path to homelessness, the Cork Homeless Forum, steered by Cork City Council, highlighted the need to provide supported accommodation for young homeless people and those at imminent risk of entering a homeless service. The vision was to provide a tailored service for homeless young people whilst linking its residents to meaningful programmes that would build up the resilience, skills and capacity of each young person for self- fulfilling independent living. Adopting the Foyer concept to meet the needs of homeless young people in Cork was a brave and innovative decision by Cork City Council. Their hindsight has changed the pathway and lives of hundreds of homeless young people to which we are very proud. 03 The homeless statistics for the 18-25’s demonstrate a consistently high demand for the homeless services in Cork city. Young people using homeless services in Cork city during the past 3 years represent 23% of all homeless people accommodated in the Cork homeless services. Just 4% of all homeless service units in Cork operate a 24/7 service and are specifically tailored for the homeless 18-25’s, which are all provided by the one project, the Cork Foyer (National Pathway, Accommodation and Support Database System 7th October 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Analysis of Foyer and Foyer-Like Youth Housing Models
    Financial Analysis of Foyer and Foyer-like Youth Housing Models Swinburne University Homelessness Research Collaboration National Homelessness Research Agenda 2009-2013 Adam Steen & David Mackenzie June 2013 Professor Adam Steen: c/- Swinburne Institute for Social Research Swinburne University Contact details: 0417557108 or [email protected] Associate Professor David Mackenzie Swinburne Institute for Social Research Swinburne University 039214 5462 or [email protected] This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to Commonwealth Copyright Administration Attorney General’s Department Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, CANBERRA ACT 2600 or posted at www.ag.gov.au/cca Commonwealth of Australia 2013 ISBN (ISSN): 978-0-9775259-7-3 This project is supported by the Australian Government through the National Homelessness Research Agenda of the Department for Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs. The opinions, comments and/or analysis expressed in this document are those of the author or authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Minister for Housing and Homelessness and cannot be taken in any way as expressions of government policy. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 LIST OF TABLES 4 GLOSSARY 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 1 INTRODUCTION 11 2 YOUTH FOYERS: A REVIEW OF
    [Show full text]
  • Cork-Foyer-Annual-Report-2015
    Cork Foyer is a Cork City Council Housing & Community initiative CORK FOYER ANNUAL REPORT 2015 ...where people come first! CONTENTS 03 Statement from the Chair Promoting Positive Change through Quality 07 Housing Supports Promoting Personal Achievement through 09 Recognition & Opportunity Promoting Transition to Adulthood and Stable 13 Independence 15 Financial Statement 16 Staff Team 17 Management Committee Members 18 Mission Statement 01 There are many reasons why someone may need a safe home along with individualised support to make changes from what may have been a chaotic, possibly troubled life towards a positive and productive future. For young people the transition from adolescence to adulthood can be difficult. We listen and respond to the hopes and aspirations of those we accommodate, helping them plan for life beyond the Foyer – a safe home, a job, friends and family. Our services are designed and delivered with an approach that holds the person at the centre of what we do. Our starting point is to focus on a person’s strengths and potential and to avoid highlighting any deficits. Building self esteem and confidence is often a critical starting point, while working in a non judgmental way. The internal programmes facilitated by the YMCA Dion Project and Youth Health Service have enhanced the support provision and information available to residents, particularly around sexual health and relationships. “Living healthily is something we value at the Foyer and it is not always the case with many residents. The Foyer continually strives to promote healthy life styles, habits and choices”. Subscribing to the National Youth Council’s Health Promotion Quality Mark has served to add more focus around the health and wellbeing of both staff and residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Foyer Central Social Impact Bond
    Foyer Central Social Impact Bond Information Memorandum 23 December 2020 1 Important notices This Information Memorandum (the IM) relates to the issue Responsibility of limited recourse Foyer Central Social Impact Bonds (the The Issuer accepts responsibility for the information Foyer Central SIBs or Notes) by SVA Nominees Pty Ltd (ACN 616 235 753) (the Issuer) in its capacity as trustee for the contained in this IM, other than for (1) the information Foyer Central SIB Trust (ABN 24 304 856 506) (the Trust). included in Sections 4 (Foyer Central Program details), 5.3 The Trust is managed by Social Ventures Australia Limited (Uniting) and 5.4 (Key Uniting personnel) which have been (ACN 100 487 572, AFSL 428865) (the Trust Manager). furnished to the Issuer by Uniting, (2) Sections 5.5 (SGCH) and 5.6 (Key SGCH personnel), which have been furnished to Capitalised terms in this IM are defined terms and they are the Issuer by SGCH, and (3) the details of the other persons listed in Section 11 (Glossary) or defined elsewhere in the IM. named in the ‘Directory’ section. No disclosure to Investors The NSW Government has not had any role in the This IM is not a prospectus or other disclosure document preparation of this IM nor has it independently verified for the purposes of the Corporations Act. Neither this IM the information contained in this IM. Accordingly, no nor any other disclosure document in relation to the Notes representation, warranty or undertaking, express or implied has been, or will be, lodged with ASIC. The offering of the is made, and no responsibility or liability is accepted by the Notes has not been, nor will be, examined or approved NSW Government for the issue of this IM, including as to by ASIC.
    [Show full text]