DOCSLIB.ORG

General Assembly Distr.: General 14 November 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
General Assembly Distr.: General 14 November 2017 United Nations A/72/448 General Assembly Distr.: General 14 November 2017 Original: English Seventy-second session Agenda item 54 Report of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories Report of the Special Political and Decolonization Committee (Fourth Committee) Rapporteur: Mr. Angel Angelov (Bulgaria) I. Introduction 1. At its 2nd plenary meeting, on 15 September 2017, the General Assembly, on the recommendation of the General Committee, decided to include in the agenda of its seventy-second session the item entitled “Report of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories” and to allocate it to the Special Political and Decolonization Committee (Fourth Committee). 2. The Fourth Committee held a general debate on the item at its 26th and 27th meetings, on 7 and 8 November 2017, and took action on the item at its 28th meeting, on 10 November. Statements and observations made in the course of the Committee’s consideration of the item are reflected in the relevant summary records.1 3. For its consideration of the item, the Committee had before it the following documents: (a) Report of the Secretary-General on the work of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories (A/72/296); (b) Report of the Secretary-General on the applicability of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949, to the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and the other occupied Arab territories (A/72/314); __________________ 1 A/C.4/72/SR.26, A/C.4/72/SR.27 and A/C.4/72/SR.28. 17-20238 (E) 201117 *1720238* A/72/448 (c) Report of the Secretary-General on the occupied Syrian Golan (A/72/538); (d) Report of the Secretary-General on Israeli practices affecting the human rights of the Palestinian people in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem (A/72/565); (e) Report of the Secretary-General on Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and the occupied Syrian Golan (A/72/564); (f) Note by the Secretary-General transmitting the forty-ninth report of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories (A/72/539); 4. At the 26th meeting, on 7 November, the representative of Sri Lanka, on behalf of the Chair of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories, introduced the report of that Committee. 5. At the same meeting, the Director of the New York Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights introduced the reports of the Secretary-General. 6. Also at the 26th meeting, the observer for the State of Palestine made a statement. II. Consideration of proposals 7. At its 28th meeting, on 10 November, the Committee was informed that the draft resolutions contained in documents A/C.4/72/L.21 to L.25 had no programme budget implications. A. Draft resolution A/C.4/72/L.21 8. At the 28th meeting, on 10 November, the representative of Cuba, on behalf of Algeria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Bolivia (Plurinational State of), Brunei Darussalam, Cuba, Djibouti, Ecuador, Egypt, Indonesia, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Malaysia, Mauritania, Morocco, Nicaragua, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Tunisia, the United Arab Emirates, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Yemen and the State of Palestine, introduced a draft resolution entitled “Work of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories” (A/C.4/72/L.21). Subsequently, Maldives, Mali, Namibia, Senegal, Somalia and the Sudan joined in sponsoring the draft resolution. 9. At the same meeting, the Committee adopted draft resolution A/C.4/72/L.21 by a recorded vote of 86 to 11, with 75 abstentions (see para. 18, draft resolution I). The voting was as follows:2 In favour: Afghanistan, Algeria, Angola, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia (Plurinational State of), Brunei Darussalam, Cabo Verde, Cambodia, Chad, Chile, China, Comoros, Congo, __________________ 2 The delegation of Nepal subsequently indicated that, had it been present, it would have voted in favour. 2/27 17-20238 A/72/448 Cuba, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Djibouti, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guyana, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Lebanon, Lesotho, Libya, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Nicaragua, Niger, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Somalia, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, United Republic of Tanzania, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe. Against: Australia, Canada, Guatemala, Honduras, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Nauru, Solomon Islands, South Sudan, United States of America. Abstaining: Albania, Andorra, Argentina, Armenia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Colombia, Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Montenegro, Myanmar, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Samoa, San Marino, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor- Leste, Togo, Tonga, Tuvalu, Ukraine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Uruguay, Vanuatu. B. Draft resolution A/C.4/72/L.22 10. At the 28th meeting, on 10 November, the representative of Cuba, on behalf of Algeria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Bolivia (Plurinational State of), Brunei Darussalam, Cuba, Djibouti, Ecuador, Egypt, Indonesia, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Malaysia, Mauritania, Morocco, Nicaragua, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, the Sudan, Tunisia, the United Arab Emirates, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Yemen and the State of Palestine, introduced a draft resolution entitled “Applicability of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949, to the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and the other occupied Arab territories” (A/C.4/72/L.22). Subsequently, Chad, Maldives, Mali, Senegal and Somalia joined in sponsoring the draft resolution. 11. At the same meeting, the Committee adopted draft resolution A/C.4/72/L.22 by a recorded vote of 159 to 8, with 7 abstentions (see para. 18, draft resolution II). The voting was as follows:3 In favour: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Argentina, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia (Plurinational State of), Bosnia and __________________ 3 The delegation of Nepal subsequently indicated that, had it been present, it would have voted in favour. 17-20238 3/27 A/72/448 Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Cambodia, Chad, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czechia, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Libya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somalia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Tuvalu, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe. Against: Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Educational Disruption and Recovery in Palestine
    CHAPTER IV Educational disruption and recovery in Palestine Said ASSAF Director-General, Training, Qualification and Supervision, Ministry of Education, Ramallah, Palestine National Authority INTRODUCTION The West Bank and Gaza Strip were occupied by Israel in 1967. Although the occupied territories retained many of the pre-existing legal and administrative structures, the military authorities superimposed more than 1,000 military orders which practically cancelled the legal provisions. Education was one of the major sectors to have suffered from these overriding military orders. As a result, the education system in the West Bank and Gaza Strip has had somewhat of a schizophrenic status. While the administrative terms of reference remain those of the Jordanian and Egyptian systems, the education system has been controlled and censored by the Israeli occupation authorities since 1967. When the Palestinians gained control of their education system in August 1994, the Ministry of Education (MOE), the largest Palestinian service sector, had to simultaneously confront numerous challenges while reconstructing the education system. This paper will examine the Palestinian response to the schizophrenic nature of the education system. The paper begins with a description of the education system under Israeli administration (1967-1994). It is followed by a brief overview of educational policies during the Intifada period and the innovative Palestinian responses to Israeli obstructionist strategies particularly during the period of the uprising. The following section examines the impact of extended occupation on the Palestinian education system, particularly in terms of deteriorating quality. The paper then goes on to present the current challenges that the Palestinians face in regaining control of their education system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between International Humanitarian Law and the International Criminal Tribunals Hortensia D
    Volume 88 Number 861 March 2006 The relationship between international humanitarian law and the international criminal tribunals Hortensia D. T. Gutierrez Posse Hortensia D. T. Gutierrez Posse is Professor of Public International Law, University of Buenos Aires Abstract International humanitarian law is the branch of customary and treaty-based international positive law whose purposes are to limit the methods and means of warfare and to protect the victims of armed conflicts. Grave breaches of its rules constitute war crimes for which individuals may be held directly accountable and which it is up to sovereign states to prosecute. However, should a state not wish to, or not be in a position to, prosecute, the crimes can be tried by international criminal tribunals instituted by treaty or by binding decision of the United Nations Security Council. This brief description of the current legal and political situation reflects the state of the law at the dawn of the twenty-first century. It does not, however, describe the work of a single day or the fruit of a single endeavour. Quite the contrary, it is the outcome of the international community’s growing awareness, in the face of the horrors of war and the indescribable suffering inflicted on humanity throughout the ages, that there must be limits to violence and that those limits must be established by the law and those responsible punished so as to discourage future perpetrators from exceeding them. Short historical overview International humanitarian law has played a decisive role in this development, as both the laws and customs of war and the rules for the protection of victims fall 65 H.
    [Show full text]
  • No. ICC-01/18 16 March 2020 Original
    ICC-01/18-77 16-03-2020 1/29 NM PT No.: ICC-01/18 Original: English Date: 16 March 2020 PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Péter Kovács, Presiding Judge Judge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut Judge Reine Adélaïde Sophie Alapini-Gansou SITUATION IN THE STATE OF PALESTINE Public Amicus Curiae Submissions Pursuant to Rule 103 Source: Professor Richard Falk No. ICC-01/18 1/29 16 March 2020 ICC-01/18-77 16-03-2020 2/29 NM PT Document to be notified in accordance with regulation 31 of the Regulations of the Court to: The Office of the Prosecutor Counsel for the Defence Ms Fatou Bensoua, Prosecutor Mr James Stewart, Deputy Prosecutor Legal Representatives of the Victims Legal Representatives of the Applicants Unrepresented Victims Unrepresented Applicants (Participation/Reparation) The Office of Public Counsel for Victims The Office of Public Counsel for the Paolina Massida Defence States’ Representatives Amicus Curiae The competent authorities of the State of Professor John Quigley Palestine Guernica 37 International Justice Chambers The European Centre for Law and REGISTRY Justice Professor Hatem Bazian The Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust The Czech Republic The Israel Bar Association Professor Richard Falk The Organization of Islamic Cooperation The Lawfare Project, the Institute for NGO Research, Palestinian Media Watch, and the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs MyAQSA Foundation Professor Eyal Benvenisti The Federal Republic of Germany Australia UK Lawyers for Israel, B’nai B’rith UK, the International Legal Forum, the Jerusalem Initiative and the Simon Wiesenthal Centre The Palestinian Bar Association Prof. Laurie Blank, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • “What Your Children Do Will Touch Upon You”
    Russia “What Your Children Do HUMAN Will Touch Upon You” RIGHTS WATCH Punitive House-Burning in Chechnya “What Your Children Do Will Touch Upon You” Punitive House-Burning in Chechnya Copyright © 2009 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-514-8 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org July 2009 1-56432-514-8 “What Your Children Do Will Touch Upon You” Punitive House-Burning in Chechnya I. Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology .................................................................................................................. 4 II. Recommendations .......................................................................................................... 5 To the Government of the Russian Federation .................................................................. 5 To Russia’s International Partners ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949
    THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 12 AUGUST 1949 AUGUST 12 OF CONVENTIONS THE GENEVA THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 12 AUGUST 1949 0173/002 05.2010 10,000 ICRC Mission The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is an impartial, neutral and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and other situations of violence and to provide them with assistance. The ICRC also endeavours to prevent suffering by promoting and strengthening humanitarian law and universal humanitarian principles. Established in 1863, the ICRC is at the origin of the Geneva Conventions and the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. It directs and coordinates the international activities conducted by the Movement in armed conflicts and other situations of violence. THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 12 AUGUST 1949 THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 1949 1 Contents Preliminary remarks .......................................................................................................... 19 GENEVA CONVENTION FOR THE AMELIORATION OF THE CONDITION OF THE WOUNDED AND SICK IN ARMED FORCES IN THE FIELD OF 12 AUGUST 1949 CHAPTER I General Provisions ....................................................................................................... 35 Article 1 Respect for the Convention ..................................................................... 35 Article 2 Application of the Convention ................................................................ 35 Article 3 Conflicts not of an international
    [Show full text]
  • Collaboration and Resistance—The Ninth Fort As a Test Case
    Aya Ben-Naftali Director, Massuah Institute for the Study of the Holocaust Collaboration and Resistance: The Ninth Fort as a Test Case The Ninth Fort is one of a chain of nine forts surrounding the city of Kovno, Lithuania. In connection with the Holocaust, this location, like Ponary, Babi Yar, and Rumbula, marks the first stage of the Final Solution—the annihilation of the Jewish people. The history of this site of mass slaughtering is an extreme case of the Lithuanians’ deep involvement in the systematic extermination of the Jews, as well as an extraordinary case of resistance by prisoners there. 1. Designation of the Ninth Fort as a Major Killing Site The forts surrounding Kovno were constructed between 1887 and 1910 to protect the city from German invasion. The Ninth Fort, six kilometers northwest of the city, was considered the most important of them. In the independent Republic of Lithuania, it served as an annex of the central prison of Kovno and had a capacity of 250 prisoners. Adjacent to the fort was a state-owned farm of eighty-one hectares, where the prisoners were forced to work the fields and dig peat.1 The Ninth Fort was chosen as the main regional execution site in advance. Its proximity to the suburb of Vilijampole (Slobodka), where the Kovno ghetto had been established, was apparently the main reason. In his final report on the extermination of Lithuanian Jews, Karl Jäger, commander of Einsatzkommando 3 and the Security Police and SD in Lithuania, noted the factors that informed his choice of killing sites (Exekutionsplatze): …The carrying out of such Aktionen is first of all an organizational problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing the National Legal Framework in Ukraine for Protecting the Human Rights of Internally Displaced Persons
    ENHANCING THE NATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK IN UKRAINE FOR PROTECTING THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS Council of Europe Project "Strengthening the Human Rights Protection of Internally Displaced Persons in Ukraine" Under the Framework of the Council of Europe Action Plan for Ukraine 2015-2017 2016 About this study This study was prepared as part of the Council of Europe Project “Strengthening the Human Rights Protection of Internally Displaced Persons in Ukraine”. Erin Mooney, an international expert on internal displacement, led and coordinated the research team, drafted the introductory and international framework sections and edited the study. Ukrainian legal experts Yevgen Gerasymenko, Olga Morkova, and Sergiy Zayets drafted the analysis of national legislation while the analysis of Council of Europe standards was drafted by Barbara McCallin as well as researchers and experts from the Advocacy Centre on Council of Europe Standards (ACCESS): Filip Chráska, Evgenia Giakoumopoulou and Costas Paraskevas. Antonina Vykhrest, Ghanna Khrystova and Theodora Kristofori of the Council of Europe finalized the report for publication. Note on the period of analysis covered by this study (December 2015 – May 2016) This study was prepared from December 2015 through May 2016. During this time, the Ukrainian legal and regulatory framework underwent some significant changes, both through the adoption of new legislation as well as amendments to existing laws and by-laws. This included changes directly affecting the human rights of internally displaced persons. On 8 June 2016, after the study had been sent for consultation, finalized and translated, the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (CMU) adopted two resolutions that raised extensive concerns from IDPs, civil society and the international community.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2017 Volume XL, Bulletin No. 10
    October 2017 Volume XL, Bulletin No. 10 Contents Page I. UN Special Coordinator encouraged by the commitment to return Gaza to the full control of the Palestinian Authority 1 II. UNESCO Executive Board adopts decision on the question of Palestine 1 III. UN Secretary-General encouraged by progress in allowing the Palestinian government to take up its responsibilities in Gaza 3 IV. UN Special Coordinator and Palestinian Prime Minister discuss implementation of the intra- Palestinian agreement 4 V. Assistant Secretary-General for Political Affairs briefs the Security Council 4 VI. Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People submits report 7 VII. UN Special Coordinator condemns Hamas statements calling for the destruction of the State of Israel 9 VIII. UN Special Rapporteur Lynk issues report addressing the illegality of Israeli occupation 10 The Bulletin can be found in the United Nations Information System on the Question of Palestine (UNISPAL) on the Internet at: http://unispal.un.org Disclaimer: The texts cited in this Monthly Bulletin have been reproduced in their original form. The Division for Palestinian Rights is consequently not responsible for the views, positions or discrepancies contained in these texts. I. UN SPECIAL COORDINATOR ENCOURAGED BY THE COMMITMENT TO RETURN GAZA TO THE FULL CONTROL OF THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY On 3 October 2017, the United Nations Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process Nickolay Mladenov issued the following statement: This morning I met with Palestinian the implementation of the Cairo Prime Minister Rami Hamdallah in Gaza. I understandings. was encouraged by the firm commitment of President Abbas and the Government to The United Nations stands ready to return to Gaza under the full control of the continue working with the legitimate legitimate Palestinian Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Crime and Collective Punishment
    Jeff McMahan / 4 Collective Crime and Collective Punishment JEFF MCMAHAN Introduction George Fletcher emerges in his writing, as in his life, as recent work than to the abbreviated discussions in the a colorful and highly individual figure. The last thing first volume of the Grammar. I think, however, that my one expects of him is the surrender of individual iden- arguments will be highly germane to Fletcher’s larger tity to an anonymous submersion in the collective. Yet project in the three volumes of the Grammar, and that doctrinally he is a collectivist. In his recent writings, he some of the objections I raise here anticipate problems has been seeking to collectivize just about everything: that will arise in the subsequent two volumes. action, responsibility, guilt, liability, self-defense, crimi- Before turning to war and international criminal law, nal punishment, international criminal law, action in it is worth observing how pervasive the collectivizing war, war crimes, and so on. tendency has become in Fletcher’s work. His recent dis- It is, however, only in the final section of The Gram- cussions of self-defense continue to defend the account mar of Criminal Law, volume 1, that Fletcher discusses to which he has been attracted for decades. He believes collective guilt and the alleged collective nature of the that individual self-defense is not justified solely by the crimes within the jurisdiction of the International Crim- rights or inviolability of the individual victim but by the inal Court (ICC).1 Yet the penultimate sentence
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Their Additional Protocols International Humanitarian Law April 2011
    Summary of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Their Additional Protocols International Humanitarian Law April 2011 Overview: Protecting the Byzantine Empire and the Lieber Code The Red Cross Vulnerable in War used during the United States Civil War. and International International humanitarian law (IHL) is The development of modern Humanitarian Law a set of rules that seek for humanitarian international humanitarian law is The Red Cross and the Geneva reasons to limit the effects of armed credited to the efforts of 19th century Conventions were born when Henry conflict. IHL protects persons who are Swiss businessman Henry Dunant. In Dunant witnessed the devastating not or who are no longer participating in 1859, Dunant witnessed the aftermath consequences of war at a battlefield hostilities and it restricts the means and in Italy. In the aftermath of that battle, of a bloody battle between French methods of warfare. IHL is also known Dunant argued successfully for the and Austrian armies in Solferino, Italy. as the law of war and the law of armed creation of a civilian relief corps to The departing armies left a battlefield respond to human suffering during conflict. littered with wounded and dying men. conflict, and for rules to set limits on A major part of international Despite Dunant’s valiant efforts to how war is waged. humanitarian law is contained in the mobilize aid for the soldiers, thousands Inspired in part by her work in the four Geneva Conventions of 1949 that died. Civil War, Clara Barton would later have been adopted by all nations in found the American Red Cross and In “A Memory of Solferino,” his book also advocate for the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Lithuanian Government on the Visit to Lithuania Carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Tort
    CPT/Inf (2011) 17 Report to the Lithuanian Government on the visit to Lithuania carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 14 to 18 June 2010 The Lithuanian Government has requested the publication of this report and of its response. The Government’s response is set out in document CPT/Inf (2011) 18. Strasbourg, 19 May 2011 - 3 - CONTENTS Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT's report............................................................................ 5 I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................7 A. Dates of the visit and composition of the delegation ............................................................. 7 B. Objectives of the visit and establishments visited.................................................................. 7 C. Consultations and co-operation............................................................................................... 8 II. FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED.............................. 11 A. Police establishments.............................................................................................................. 11 1. Preliminary remarks........................................................................................................ 11 2. Ill-treatment..................................................................................................................... 12 3. Safeguards
    [Show full text]
  • “We Are Like the Dead” RIGHTS Torture and Other Human Rights Abuses in Jail Ogaden, WATCH Somali Regional State, Ethiopia
    HUMAN “We are Like the Dead” RIGHTS Torture and other Human Rights Abuses in Jail Ogaden, WATCH Somali Regional State, Ethiopia “We are Like the Dead” Torture and other Abuses in Jail Ogaden, Somali Regional State, Ethiopia Copyright © 2018 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-36291 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org JULY 2018 ISBN: 978-1-6231-36291 “We are Like the Dead” Torture and other Abuses in Jail Ogaden, Somali Regional State, Ethiopia Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................... i Map of Zones in the Somali Region ..................................................................................... ii Summary ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]