DOCSLIB.ORG

A Limnological Study of Factors Affecting Algal Biodiversity in the Hartbeespoort Dam By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Limnological Study of Factors Affecting Algal Biodiversity in the Hartbeespoort Dam By A limnological study of factors affecting algal biodiversity in the Hartbeespoort Dam by GUSTAVE OLOLO 920303106 MINOR DISSERTATION Submitted in the partial fulfilment for the requirements for the degree MAGISTER SCIENTIAE in AQUATIC HEALTH FACULTY OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG Supervisor: Dr. Richard Greenfield Co-Supervisor: Prof. Victor Wepener OCTOBER 2013 1 Acknowledgment I would like to thank God almighty, the provider for everything He makes possible for me along this study period. I also would like to express my heartfelt appreciation to: Dr. Richard Greenfield, my supervisor, for his assistance, academic guidance and motivational support throughout the duration of my studies. Prof. Victor Wepener, my co-supervisor for his constant support, his advice, financial support and proof reading of my dissertation. The Faculty of Sciences, The Department of Zoology at the University of Johannesburg for the use of facilities and equipment. Mrs E. Fisher and Mr B.Rufaro (Spectrum) for their support during this project. My Fellow research colleagues, P. Nakarmi, S. Kanga, A. Lesiba, R. Gerber, R.Tate, O.T. Olubambi, V. Maboko, L. Kruger, N. Dumisile and L. Lungile for their help and academic support. To my Family, for all their continuous support, love and for their belief in me. To my Beloved Daughter Avomo Ololo Rebecca Louisia. To my Dear Mother Andjolo Marie-Louise. 2 Table of Contents Declaration ............................................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. Acknowledgment .................................................................................................................................... 2 Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................... 3 List of tables ............................................................................................................................................ 6 List of figures .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Abbreviations and Acronyms .................................................................................................................. 9 Glossary ................................................................................................................................................ 10 Abstract ................................................................................................................................................. 12 Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................... 13 1.2 Problem Statement and Hypothesis ...................................................................................... 14 1.3 Aim and objective of the study ............................................................................................. 15 Chapter 2 Literature Review .......................................................................................................... 16 2.1 Cyanobacteria ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Aquatic macrophytes ............................................................................................................. 18 2.3 Chlorophyll-a ........................................................................................................................ 18 2.4 The process of eutrophication ............................................................................................... 19 2.5 Environmental factors influencing algal bloom formation .................................................. 19 2.5.1 Temperature .................................................................................................................. 20 2.5.2 pH .................................................................................................................................. 20 2.5.3 Turbidity and light penetration ...................................................................................... 20 2.5.4 Nutrients ........................................................................................................................ 21 2.6 The Harbeespoort Dam ......................................................................................................... 21 2.6.1 History, construction and usage .................................................................................... 21 2.6.2 Water quality ................................................................................................................. 22 Chapter 3 ............................................................................................................................................... 24 3 Materials and Methods .......................................................................................................................... 24 3.1 Study area and Sampling points ............................................................................................ 24 3.2 Physical parameters ............................................................................................................... 26 3.3 Nutrients analysis .................................................................................................................. 26 3.4 Metals in water and total suspended solids (TSS)................................................................. 26 3.5 Chlorophyll-a quantification ................................................................................................. 26 3.6 Algal identification and quantification .................................................................................. 27 3.7 Statistical analysis ................................................................................................................ 27 Chapter 4 Results and Discussion .................................................................................................. 28 4.1 Physical water quality parameters ........................................................................................ 28 4.1.1 Temperature ........................................................................................................................ 28 4.1.2 Dissolved oxygen (DO)....................................................................................................... 30 4.1.3 Electrical conductivity (EC) ................................................................................................. 32 4.1.4 Total suspended solids (TSS) ............................................................................................... 34 4.1.5 pH values .............................................................................................................................. 35 4.2 Chemical water quality parameters ....................................................................................... 36 4.2.1 Total phosphorus ........................................................................................................... 37 4.2.2 Nitrate and nitrite .......................................................................................................... 39 4.2.3 Ammonium ................................................................................................................... 42 4.3 Trace metals .......................................................................................................................... 44 4.4 Chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) quantification .................................................................................... 47 4.5 Phytoplankton population ..................................................................................................... 49 4.5.1 Cyanophyta (Blue green algae) ..................................................................................... 50 4.5.1.1 Microcystis aeruginosa ................................................................................................. 50 4.5.1.2 Anabeana sp. ................................................................................................................. 50 4.5.1.3 Oscillatoria sp. .............................................................................................................. 50 4.5.1.4 Arthrospira sp. .............................................................................................................. 51 4.5.1.5 Cylindrospermopsis sp. ................................................................................................. 51 4.5.2 Chrysophyta (Yellow green algae) ................................................................................ 51 4 4.5.2.1 Melosira granulate ........................................................................................................ 51 4.5.2.2 Cyclotella sp. ................................................................................................................. 51 4.5.3 Chlorophyta (Green algae) ............................................................................................ 51 4.5.3.1 Oocystis sp. ................................................................................................................... 51 4.5.3.2 Scenedesmus sp. ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Microcystin Concentrations in a Nile Crocodile
    Microcystin concentrations in a Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus) breeding dam and vertical transmission to eggs By Alukhethi Singo: 14437105 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Magister Scientiae (Master of Veterinary Science) to the Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria Date submitted: 15 June 2016 Supervisor: Prof C.J. Botha Co-supervisor: Prof. J.G. Myburgh © University of Pretoria ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to acknowledge my supervisor and co-supervisor, Prof C.J. Botha and Prof J.G. Myburgh for their constructive corrections and support throughout the project, and for sharing their wisdom with me. My sincere gratitude goes to the departmental laboratory technologists, Ms Arina Ferreira and Ms Annette Venter for being fully hands-on in helping me put everything together to make this project a success. I would also like to thank Dr Pete Laver for his expert statistical analysis and the complete report of his findings. Special thanks to Dr Victor Bagla for your outstanding, support and mentoring during this period. To my colleagues, each of your expertise moulded me to be more confident and desired to excel more, thank you. To my sponsors; University of Pretoria and the Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway, I am grateful for your outstanding financial support throughout the duration of the project. I would also like to extend my gratitude Prof Dayo Fasina and Dr Magda Rosemann for their support in conclusion of this project. To my mom and my late dad, I love you; your voices on a daily basis from a distance lit a spark in me to be the person you believed I will grow to become and I am yet to make you more proud.
    [Show full text]
  • Gauteng Gauteng
    Gauteng Gauteng Thousands of visitors to South Africa make Gauteng their first stop, but most don’t stay long enough to appreciate all it has in store. They’re missing out. With two vibrant cities, Johannesburg and Tshwane (Pretoria), and a hinterland stuffed with cultural treasures, there’s a great deal more to this province than Jo’burg Striking gold International Airport, says John Malathronas. “The golf course was created in 1974,” said in Pimville, Soweto, and the fact that ‘anyone’ the manager. “Eighteen holes, par 72.” could become a member of the previously black- It was a Monday afternoon and the tees only Soweto Country Club, was spoken with due were relatively quiet: fewer than a dozen people satisfaction. I looked around. Some fairways were in the heart of were swinging their clubs among the greens. overgrown and others so dried up it was difficult to “We now have 190 full-time members,” my host tell the bunkers from the greens. Still, the advent went on. “It costs 350 rand per year to join for of a fully-functioning golf course, an oasis of the first year and 250 rand per year afterwards. tranquillity in the noisy, bustling township, was, But day membership costs 60 rand only. Of indeed, an achievement of which to be proud. course, now anyone can become a member.” Thirty years after the Soweto schoolboys South Africa This last sentence hit home. I was, after all, rebelled against the apartheid regime and carved ll 40 Travel Africa Travel Africa 41 ERIC NATHAN / ALAMY NATHAN ERIC Gauteng Gauteng LERATO MADUNA / REUTERS LERATO its name into the annals of modern history, the The seeping transformation township’s predicament can be summed up by Tswaing the word I kept hearing during my time there: of Jo’burg is taking visitors by R511 Crater ‘upgraded’.
    [Show full text]
  • Contaminants of Emerging Concern in the Hartbeespoort Dam Catchment
    VU Research Portal Contaminants of emerging concern in the Hartbeespoort Dam catchment and the uMngeni River estuary 2016 pollution incident, South Africa Rimayi, Cornelius; Odusanya, David; Weiss, Jana M.; de Boer, Jacob; Chimuka, Luke published in Science of the Total Environment 2018 DOI (link to publisher) 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.263 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record document license Article 25fa Dutch Copyright Act Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) Rimayi, C., Odusanya, D., Weiss, J. M., de Boer, J., & Chimuka, L. (2018). Contaminants of emerging concern in the Hartbeespoort Dam catchment and the uMngeni River estuary 2016 pollution incident, South Africa. Science of the Total Environment, 627, 1008-1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.263 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Challenges and Prospects
    HARTBEESPOORT DAM REMEDIATION Future challenges and prospects INCREASING CHALLENGES of the Hartbeespoort Dam Integrated restore healthy ecosystems through biodi- Th e positive changes (more and longer Biological Remediation Programme, are a versity. Th is principle to conserve, protect periods of clear water experienced since clear indication of the powerful potential and manage towards optimum biodiversity 2009, absence of bad odour, etc) recorded available within an integrated approach is not only a requirement in the National within 18 months after the implementation towards unlocking nature’s ability to Environmental Management Act (Act 107 of 1998), but is echoed in the National Water Act (Act 73 of 1998) through the Flow increases at Kalkheuwel requirements of the Reserve to manage 700 towards aquatic ecosystem diversity. Th e world has experienced tremendous 600 population growth over the past several 500 decades, a situation that is no diff erent in /a) 3 South Africa. Water is essential for humans 400 in many ways, including water supply and 300 storage, land value enhancements, recrea- Flow (million m Flow tion, aesthetics and even transportation 200 (larger river systems). Communities there- fore normally settle and grow near areas 100 where there is a relatively sustainable water 0 resource. However, the increasing popula- 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 tion growth is threatening the quality and Date quantity of both surface and ground water, Figure 1: Flow increases in the Crocodile River (1923–2011) especially in the highly developed urban Figure 2: Delineation of the Hartbeespoort Dam catchment Civil Engineering August 2012 53 areas, posing signifi cant challenges when it in signifi cant quantities of additional water urban and bushveld mining complex comes to sustainable water resource man- being piped into the region to satisfy water (platinum, chrome and base minerals) agement, which is only possible if done in an demand.
    [Show full text]
  • Book 3 Context17pdf
    University of Pretoria etd – Pettey, R P (2005) Hartbeespoo rtdam Bu tterf ly Co nse rva ncy y d u t S t x e t n PART o 3 C Figure 001: Parides iphidamas by Ryan Pettey University of Pretoria etd – Pettey, R P (2005) SOUTH AFRICA 3.02: HARTBEESPOORT DAM The Hartbeespoort Dam area is one of the fastest growing areas in the country, which attracts NORTH WEST PROVINCE economic growth. Refer to Appendix C. Tourism is very important, not only to the area but South Africa as a whole. Tourist nodes have recently started to emerge throughout the Hartbeespoort area which attract people from all over the world. One such node is at Damdoryn, the area where the site is situated. s o sm o K MADIBENG MUNICIPAL DISTRICT N OR TH y HARTBEESPOORT DAM d berg usten u R t 3.01: PHYSICAL POSITION S t Schoemansville x LOCATION e t t d The site lies on the northern slopes of the l 3.03: THE SITE AT THE DAMDORYN NODE i W n e Magaliesberg Mountain Range, in the South Africand o province, North West. The North West province C consists of 25 municipal districts of which the HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF THE 014 Madibeng Municipality forms the focus area. MAGALIESBERG AREA Hartbeespoort Dam falls within the Madibeng “Until the last century, herds of game, extraordinary Municipal district, although prior to 2000 both in their numbers and variety, inhabited these Hartbeespoort had its own Municipality mountains. It was they, more than anything else, (Hartbeespoort Local Municipality).
    [Show full text]
  • Pampoen Nek Cutting
    2018 Outstanding International Project Pampoen Nek Cutting By Dustin Strever ituated in a pristine part of the country near the results and the minimal dust created while shooting facili- Hartbeespoort Dam in the Gauteng province of tated approval of the wet-mix alternative. It should be noted S sunny South Africa, the Pampoen Nek Cutting that wet-mix shotcrete is in its infancy in above-ground civil bisects the landscape into what will one day be an exten- works in South Africa. Shotcrete Africa SCP is a pioneer in sion to the highway road network connecting the northern bringing mainstream education and acceptance of wet-mix suburbs of Johannesburg with the mining towns of Brits shotcrete to the engineers and clients. and Rustenburg and the resort complex at Sun City. The cut While there was a contract pay item for “colored gunite,” needed extensive soil support along the highway. The owner the original on-site specification called for a screeded and decided that soil nails with shotcrete facing would provide a brushed shotcrete finish. durable and economical solution to stabilize the soil slopes. ROCKSCAPING SELECTING THE WET-MIX PROCESS Due to the poor collapsible soil conditions, maintaining the Shotcrete Africa SCP, the subcontractor to Aveng Ground screeded and brushed finish required significant quanti- Engineering, was awarded the shotcrete portions of the ties of fill shotcrete (void filling) that also potentially added contract. Aveng Ground Engineering was responsible for time to the project. With strict budgets to keep, alternative all of the piling and soil nails for the project. solutions were needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Paradigm Shift Required to Counter the Eutrophication of the Hartbeespoort Dam in South Africa
    Water and Society V 159 SOCIAL PARADIGM SHIFT REQUIRED TO COUNTER THE EUTROPHICATION OF THE HARTBEESPOORT DAM IN SOUTH AFRICA INGRID DENNIS & STEFANUS RAINIER DENNIS Centre for Water Sciences and Management, North-West University, South Africa ABSTRACT Sewage discharges are poisoning major rivers and dams in South Africa, including the Hartbeespoort Dam. High nutrient concentrations promote algae growth, leading to eutrophication. The dam has been in a hypertrophic state since the early 1970s. Mismanagement of waste water treatment works (WWTWs) within the catchment area are largely to blame, with over 280 tons of phosphate and nitrate deposits. Point source pollution in the form of malfunctioning WWTWs and diffuse sources from informal settlements present along streams and rivers within the catchment area, are responsible for the high nutrient levels. Many of these settlements use water directly from the river/stream. The first step to address the problem of eutrophication is by reducing the nutrient source. A conservative mass transport model was developed to predict phosphate levels and was used to assess the impact on the dam. The average phosphate levels entering the dam is 0.72 mg/L and the target to reduce algae growth is 0.15 mg/L. Various treatment options were investigated to solve the problem, but these efforts were mainly focused on treating the symptoms rather than the cause and treatment options were very costly. Legislation regarding water pollution this is in place, but is not enforced by government. The model predictions indicate that even if all WWTWs reach a zero discharge of phosphates, the required target will still not be met.
    [Show full text]
  • WORKSHOP Gauteng | 26 July 2017
    CRADLE OF HUMANKIND WORLD HERITAGE SITE SPEED MARKETING WORKSHOP Gauteng | 26 July 2017 2016 SOUTH AFRICAN TOURISM SATSA South African Tourism is mandated to market South Africa SATSA is a member-driven, non-profit association internationally as a perfect tourism destination. representing the private sector and offers the We welcome you with open arms, hearts and the warmest, inbound tourism industry unequalled opportunities widest smiles, excited to invite you to our shores, homes for networking. SATSA represents transport providers, and braais. Come and experience our hospitality wherever tour operators, destination management companies, you go and get in touch with our wide variety of fascinating accommodation suppliers, tourism brokers, cultures and local traditions. Our people are ready to show adventure tourism providers, business tourism you our country’s natural wonders, draw you into the providers, and tourism service providers. SATSA rhythm and soul of Africa, give you close encounters with members have to conform to the highest standards our regal wildlife and take you on an unforgettable journey in the tourism industry, which are checked annually. through our ancient and recent past. We guarantee you will SATSA members are bonded, providing a financial have incredible stories to tell. guarantee of deposits held against the involuntary liquidation of a SATSA member. The SATSA logo is a guarantee to travellers of quality in tourism, and is highly prized. SATSA has a daily impact on tourism in Southern Africa through its lobbying activities. CRADLE OF HUMANKIND New to Maropeng’s temporary exhibition space, “The Gallery”, is the astonishing “Almost Human” Exhibition. This world-first exhibit tracks the incredible story of the Rising Star cave and the extraordinary discovery of a new Hominin species.
    [Show full text]
  • Glimpopo Fact Sheet
    Fact Sheet 1 The Limpopo River flows over a total distance of The Limpopo basin covers almost 14 percent of the total 1,750 kilometres. It starts at the confluence of the Marico area of its four riparian states – Botswana, South Africa, and Crocodile rivers in South Africa and flows northwest Zimbabwe and Mozambique. And of the basin’s total area, of Pretoria. It is joined by the Notwane river flowing from 44 percent is occupied by South Africa, 21 percent by Botswana, and then forms the border between Botswana Mozambique, almost 20 percent by Botswana and 16 per- and South Africa, and flows in a north easterly direction. cent by Zimbabwe. At the confluence of the Shashe river, which flows in from Zimbabwe and Botswana, the Limpopo turns almost due Drainage Network The Limpopo river has a rela- east and forms the border between Zimbabwe and South tively dense network of more than 20 tributary streams and Africa before entering Mozambique at Pafuri. For the next rivers, though most of these tributaries have either season- 561 km the river flows entirely within Mozambique and al or episodic flows. In historical times, the Limpopo river enters the Indian Ocean about 60 km downstream of the was a strong-flowing perennial river but is now regarded town of Xai-Xai. as a weak perennial river where flows frequently cease. During drought periods, no surface water is present over The Basin The Limpopo river basin is almost circular large stretches of the middle and lower reaches of the in shape with a mean altitude of 840 m above sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • TDS Load Contribution from Acid Mine Drainage to Hartbeespoort Dam, South Africa
    TDS load contribution from acid mine drainage to Hartbeespoort Dam, South Africa PJ Hobbs1* 1Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), PO Box 395, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa ABSTRACT Evidence of a mine-water impact on groundwater in the karst aquifer downstream of the actively draining West Rand Goldfield can be traced back to the early 1980s. This is attributed to the dewatering of ‘fissure water’ encountered during mining, and its discharge into the Bloubank Spruit catchment. Rewatering of the subsurface void following the cessation of mining in the late 1990s culminated in mine-water issuing from various point sources (shafts and boreholes) in 2002. The past 6 hydrological years have periodically produced the greatest volume and worst quality of mine-water discharge, causing widespread concern for the receiving aquatic environment. In this regard, the proximal Cradle of Humankind World Heritage Site attracts a much sharper focus than the distal, regionally important Hartbeespoort Dam. Objectivity requires that an assessment of the mine-water impact on the receiving surface water resources must recognise both the subregional and regional scales. The evaluation presented in this communication examines the temporal mine-water impact at both scales, and interprets the results in terms of the influence exerted by the natural hydrosystem in mitigating adverse impacts on the water resources environment. An analysis of the respective contributions of each of the major drainages to the quantity and quality of water impounded in Hartbeespoort Dam indicates that the median total dissolved solids (TDS) load delivered by the Bloubank Spruit system amounted to ~26 kt/a in the past 6 hydrological years.
    [Show full text]
  • For Roodeplaat Dam
    DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY (DWAF) PROJECT 2006-304 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN (RMP) FOR ROODEPLAAT DAM FEBRUARY 2008 REPORT 4: RMP Prepared by: Prepared for: Vela VKE Consulting Engineers DWAF P O Box 1462 Private Bag X313 Pinegowrie Pretoria 2123 0001 Contact Person: Contact Person: Dave Gertzen/Heena Bhana Project Officer: P.C. Blaauw Tel: 011 369 0600 Tel: 012 253 1093 Fax: 011 886 4589 Fax: 012 253 1905 i CONTRIBUTORS This Resource Management Plan for Roodeplaat Dam was compiled and recommended by a Technical Task Team (TTT), a multi-disciplinary team consisting of stakeholder representatives from inter alia Government; the local communities; user groups and the business sector. Contributions made by the larger stakeholder group, as indicated in Appendix A, are also recognised. DOCUMENT REVIEW RECORD REPORT WRITTEN REVIEWED RECEIVED BY DATE STATUS BY BY NAME FROM H. Bhana 2007/11/16 Draft 01 D. Gertzen TTT and public PSP E. vd Walt H. Bhana 2008/02/07 Final D. Gertzen TTT and public PSP E. vd Walt ii APPROVALS RECOMMENDED: NAME AND TITLE DATE SIGNATURE Mr. P.C. Blaauw Project Manager Mr. J.J. Pretorius Area Manager: Hartbeespoort Mr. M. R. Williams Director: Northern Operations Mr L. Moloi Chief Director: Operational Management APPROVED: NAME AND TITLE DATE SIGNATURE Chadwick Lobakeng Acting Chief Director: North West Region Dr C Ruiters Deputy Director General: National Water Resource Infrastructure Branch ANNUAL REVIEW Due date: February 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 FIVE (5) YEARLY REVIEW Due date: February 2013 iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Resource Management Plan (RMP) is the management, development and institutional plan for Roodeplaat Dam and has been compiled based on the framework set out on the following pages.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Cyanobacteria and Cyanotoxins in Hartbeespoort Dam, South Africa
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Marine and Freshwater Research, 2014, 65, 175–189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/MF13153 Diversity of cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins in Hartbeespoort Dam, South Africa Andreas BallotA,B,D, Morten SandvikB, Thomas RundbergetA,B, Christo J. BothaC and Christopher O. MilesB ANorwegian Institute for Water Research, N-0349 Oslo, Norway. BNorwegian Veterinary Institute, N-0106 Oslo, Norway. CDepartment of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, 0110, South Africa. DCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. The South African Hartbeespoort Dam is known for the occurrence of heavy Microcystis blooms. Although a few other cyanobacterial genera have been described, no detailed study on those cyanobacteria and their potential toxin production has been conducted. The diversity of cyanobacterial species and toxins is most probably underestimated. To ascertain the cyanobacterial composition and presence of cyanobacterial toxins in Hartbeespoort Dam, water samples were collected in April 2011. In a polyphasic approach, 27 isolated cyanobacterial strains were classified morphologically and phylogenetically and tested for microcystins (MCs), cylindrospermopsin (CYN), saxitoxins (STXs) and anatoxin-a (ATX) by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) and screened for toxin-encoding gene fragments. The isolated strains were identified as Sphaerospermopsis reniformis, Sphaerospermopsis aphanizomenoides, Cylindrospermopsis curvispora, Raphidiopsis curvata, Raphidiopsis mediterrranea and Microcystis aeruginosa. Only one of the Microcystis strains (AB2011/53) produced microcystins (35 variants). Forty-one microcystin variants were detected in the environmental sample from Hartbeespoort Dam, suggesting the existence of other microcystin producing strains in Hartbeespoort Dam. All investigated strains tested negative for CYN, STXs and ATX and their encoding genes.
    [Show full text]