Hollywood Blacklisting

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hollywood Blacklisting Hollywood Blacklisting Cierra Hargrove April 27, 2018 !1 Cierra Hargrove Mr. Brant Global Studies 5-27-18 Hollywood Blacklisting In the aftermath of World War II, America was still recovering from the losses of the war along with the rest of the world. Around 1945, The United States entered into a “cold war” with Russia which affected many social and political beliefs within the U.S. Along with a fear of the Soviets, came a great fear of Communism among the government and the people. The government took many actions to prevent the spread of Communism into the United States by investigating any suspicious individuals. Soon many of the allegations surrounded Hollywood and the film industry. Screenwriters, producers, and directors were called to trial and questioned for Communist affiliations.1 These people were blacklisted from the film industry and it destroyed many of their careers. Blacklisting is an example of censorship around the media, the fear of communism in the United States, and an attempt to stand up for basic civil rights. The Hollywood Blacklists were heavily influenced by the “red scare”, and had negative lasting effects on the American motion-picture industry. When World War II ended in 1945 the violent war between the countries was over, but another kind of war began. The two major world powers, America and Russia, were in constant competition with one another for wealth, political power, technological advancements, and dominance among the nations. The basis of this competition came from the ideological 1 History.com Staff. "Hollywood Ten." History.com. 2009. Accessed April 19, 2018. !2 differences between their government systems. Even though they allied together during WWII, there has always been a long-lasting mistrust between the countries over the history and ideas behind communism, and following September 1945, this spiraled into a “cold war”.2 The U.S. government feared the ideas and the practice of Communism and took many measures to prevent any spread of it into America. The public began to fear their safety even more after the Soviets acquired use of the atomic bomb, which enabled both countries to threaten each other with nuclear warfare. Each country began spying on one other, and in the 1940’s and ’50’s, the Rothenburg couple was convicted for espionage and sentenced to death, which caused even more fear and panic among the people. This fear was called the “red scare” and it lasted until around 1957 when the outside threats to the country began to lessen.3 In 1938, Congress created the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) which targeted any suspicious activity within labor unions, the military, and the government. Beginning in 1945 it became a permanent committee and most of their allegations surrounded Communist or Soviet ties.4 While the HUAC was in power, they began to focus a lot of their attention on the film industry which was seen as a source of communist activities. The government saw the film industry as a way to hide Communist messages and spread propaganda among the people.5 During the times of the war, President Roosevelt created the Office of War Information (OWI) to 2 Benson, Sonia, et al. "Cold War." UXL Encyclopedia of U.S. History, vol. 2, UXL, 2009, pp. 344-349. U.S. History In Context 3 Benson, Sonia, Daniel E. Brannen, Jr., and Rebecca Valentine. "Red Scare." In UXL Encyclopedia of U.S. History, 1306-1308. Vol. 7. Detroit: UXL, 2009. U.S. History In Context 4 Benson, Sonia, Daniel E. Brannen, Jr., and Rebecca Valentine. "House Un-American Activities Committee." In UXL Encyclopedia of U.S. History, 721-723. Vol. 4. Detroit: UXL, 2009. U.S. History In Context 5 History.com Staff. "Hollywood Ten." History.com. 2009. !3 oversee government led propaganda films and raise support for the war. However when the war was over, President Truman disbanded the OWI, therefore Hollywood was again free to produce films without government intervention.6 If any of the films had slightly suggestive content, or if anyone the movie producers were too outspoken about their political views, they caught the attention of the HUAC. In 1947, over 40 people connected to the film industry received subpoenas to appear in court before the HUAC.7 The hearings ran from October 28 to October 30, 1947, and each individual was asked the famous question “Are you now or have you ever been a member of the Communist party?”.8 The most famous leader in organizing these charges was Joseph McCarthy. He had strong beliefs that America would only succeed if Communism was cast out, calling himself America’s Savior in rooting out the Communist espionage. Although he was successful in thoroughly investigating his cause, his cases often did not have substantial evidence to provide real proof, and many precautions written into the constitution were overlooked during his trials. His ideology concerning the threat of Communism and the need to persecute any suspected people became known as “McCarthyism”.9 During the HUAC trials, most complied with the judges, however, a famous group of 10 individuals refused to answer the questions and became known as the Hollywood Ten. These people were named Alvah Bessie, Lester Cole, Edward Dmytryk, Herbert Biderman, John 6 "Movies During the War." In American Decades, edited by Judith S. Baughman, Victor Bondi, Richard Layman, Tandy McConnell, and Vincent Tompkins. Vol. 5, 1940-1949. Detroit: Gale, 2001. U.S. History In Context. 7 History.com Staff. "Hollywood Ten." History.com. 2009. 8 "The Hollywood Ten." In American Decades, edited by Judith S. Baughman, Victor Bondi, Richard Layman, Tandy McConnell, and Vincent Tompkins, 301-303. Vol. 6, 1950-1959. Detroit: Gale, 2001. U.S. History In Context. 9 "McCarthyism." Ushistory.org. 2008-2018. !4 Howard Lawson, Ring Lardner Jr., Robert Adrian Scott, Samuel Ornitz, Albert Maltz, and Dalton Trumbo.10 This group of directors and screenwriters openly challenged the validity of the committee’s accusations and reasons for prosecuting. They pleaded their right to the Fifth Amendment which allowed one to refuse to answer a question to avoid incriminating oneself, and the First Amendment which states they are allowed the freedom of belonging to any political party they choose. However their fight against Congress did not succeed, and in November 1947 they were convicted of contempt and neglecting to comply with the court system. They were each fined $1,000 and sentenced to a year in jail. They could not successfully appeal their verdict and they served their sentence in 1950.11 After being released, these people were now put on the “blacklist” of Hollywood, meaning no studio wanted to be associated with them, and it was impossible to find work. As Congress continued their investigations, the blacklist continued to get longer. This affected the lives of the screenwriters greatly, and most of their careers were permanently damaged. Friendships within the industry were broken, reputations were shattered, and families were torn apart by the court cases and jail sentences. Though they still served their punishment, the Hollywood Ten still raised a lot of support and attention for the unjust ways Congress prosecuted them, and there were a lot of supporters advocating for the release of the Ten. Some members within the directing and acting community formed a group called the Committee of the First Amendment, which supported the Hollywood Ten and went against HUAC. This committee even included famous entertainers such as 10 History.com Staff. "Hollywood Ten." History.com. 2009. 11 Ibid. !5 Humphrey Bogart, Katharine Hepburn, Judy Garland, and Lucille Ball.12 Even after the suspected people were placed on the blacklist, the screenwriters still continued to write scripts under pseudonyms or without credit to their work.13 The blacklist finally began to break down when Trumbo’s screenplay won an Academy Award, and people began to realize the unnecessary production that was made out of these writers. The popularity behind the idea of McCarthyism was beginning to decline, and slowly the blacklisted people were accepted back into society.14 The theme of anti-Communism has always been present in America, and these trials only brought more attention and paranoia to the country. Congress and the HUAC could have felt with the threat of Communism movements in a less aggressive and more productive way, while properly following the amendments laid out by the constitution. These blacklists certainly had lasting effects on the motion-picture industry, one example being all the brilliant minds in screenwriting at the time who's careers were never regained after the list. The filmmakers also had to change the way kind of pictures they showed to the public and had to be particularly sensitive to the content they screened. The industry took a huge step backward`` in their depictions of political ideas, war, crime, and any minorities.15 The Hollywood Ten were a bold group of individuals who dared to speak up for their rights against Congress and create 12 Hit or Miss Films. “Red Hollywood: A Documentary of the Red Scare in Hollywood”. Filmed [Nov. 2015]. YouTube video, 8:34. 13 "The Hollywood Ten." In American Decades, edited by Judith S. Baughman, Victor Bondi, Richard Layman, Tandy McConnell, and Vincent Tompkins, 301-303. Vol. 6, 1950-1959. Detroit: Gale, 2001. U.S. History In Context 14 Benson, Sonia, Daniel E. Brannen, Jr., and Rebecca Valentine. "Hollywood Blacklisting." In UXL Encyclopedia of U.S. History, 701-702. Vol. 4. Detroit: UXL, 2009. U.S. History In Context 15 Leab, Daniel J. "The Hollywood Blacklist: Did the Hollywood Blacklist Adversely Affect the American Motion-Picture Industry?" In History in Dispute, edited by Robbie Lieberman, 160-166.
Recommended publications
  • Creative Arts Emmy® Awards for Programs and Individual Achievements at the Nokia Theatre L.A
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE August 16, 2014 7:00 PM PT The Television Academy tonight (Saturday, August 16, 2014) presented the 2014 Creative Arts Emmy® Awards for programs and individual achievements at the Nokia Theatre L.A. LIVE in Los Angeles. This first ceremony of the 66th Emmy Awards honored guest performers on television dramas and comedy series, as well as the many talented artists and craftspeople behind the scenes to create television excellence. Produced for the 20th year by Spike Jones, Jr., this year’s Creative Arts Awards featured an array of notable presenters, among them Jane Lynch, Tony Hale, Amy Schumer, Allison Janney, Tim Gunn and Heidi Klum, Comedy Central’s Key & Peele, Fred Armisen and Carrie Brownstein, Morgan Freeman, Tony Goldwyn, Aisha Tyler, Joe Manganiello and Carrie Preston. Highlights included Jon Voight’s moving posthumous presentation of the Academy’s prestigious Governors Award to casting icon, Marion Dougherty. Voight was one of Dougherty’s discoveries. The awards, as tabulated by the independent accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP, were distributed as follows: Program Individual Total HBO 4 11 15 NBC 1 9 10 PBS 2 6 8 Fox 1 6 7 Netflix - 7 7 CBS 1 5 6 ABC 1 4 5 Discovery Channel 2 2 4 Disney Channel 1 3 4 FOX/NatGeo - 4 4 Showtime 1 3 4 Cartoon Network - 3 3 FX Networks - 3 3 Comedy Central - 2 2 Starz - 2 2 Adult Swim - 1 1 AMC - 1 1 CartoonNetwork.com - 1 1 CNN 1 - 1 comcast.com 1 - 1 ESPN 1 - 1 FunnyOrDie.com 1 - 1 justareflektor.com 1 - 1 Nat Geo WILD - 1 1 National Geographic Channel 1 - 1 pivot.tv 1 - 1 TNT 1 - 1 TELEVISION ACADEMY 2014 CREATIVE ARTS EMMY AWARDS This year’s Creative Arts telecast partner is FXM; a two-hour edited version of the ceremony will air Sunday, August 24 at 8:00 PM ET/PT with an encore at 10:00 PM ET/PT on FXM.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Gold & Dalton Trumbo on Spartacus, Blacklist Hollywood
    LH 19_1 FInal.qxp_Left History 19.1.qxd 2015-08-28 4:01 PM Page 57 Michael Gold & Dalton Trumbo on Spartacus, Blacklist Hollywood, Howard Fast, and the Demise of American Communism 1 Henry I. MacAdam, DeVry University Howard Fast is in town, helping them carpenter a six-million dollar production of his Spartacus . It is to be one of those super-duper Cecil deMille epics, all swollen up with cos - tumes and the genuine furniture, with the slave revolution far in the background and a love tri - angle bigger than the Empire State Building huge in the foreground . Michael Gold, 30 May 1959 —— Mike Gold has made savage comments about a book he clearly knows nothing about. Then he has announced, in advance of seeing it, precisely what sort of film will be made from the book. He knows nothing about the book, nothing about the film, nothing about the screenplay or who wrote it, nothing about [how] the book was purchased . Dalton Trumbo, 2 June 1959 Introduction Of the three tumultuous years (1958-1960) needed to transform Howard Fast’s novel Spartacus into the film of the same name, 1959 was the most problematic. From the start of production in late January until the end of all but re-shoots by late December, the project itself, the careers of its creators and financiers, and the studio that sponsored it were in jeopardy a half-dozen times. Blacklist Hollywood was a scary place to make a film based on a self-published novel by a “Commie author” (Fast), and a script by a “Commie screenwriter” (Trumbo).
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Document: from the BELLY of the HUAC: the RED PROBES of HOLLYWOOD, 1947-1952 Jack D. Meeks, Doctor of Philos
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: FROM THE BELLY OF THE HUAC: THE RED PROBES OF HOLLYWOOD, 1947-1952 Jack D. Meeks, Doctor of Philosophy, 2009 Directed By: Dr. Maurine Beasley, Journalism The House Un-American Activities Committee, popularly known as the HUAC, conducted two investigations of the movie industry, in 1947 and again in 1951-1952. The goal was to determine the extent of communist infiltration in Hollywood and whether communist propaganda had made it into American movies. The spotlight that the HUAC shone on Tinsel Town led to the blacklisting of approximately 300 Hollywood professionals. This, along with the HUAC’s insistence that witnesses testifying under oath identify others that they knew to be communists, contributed to the Committee’s notoriety. Until now, historians have concentrated on offering accounts of the HUAC’s practice of naming names, its scrutiny of movies for propaganda, and its intervention in Hollywood union disputes. The HUAC’s sealed files were first opened to scholars in 2001. This study is the first to draw extensively on these newly available documents in an effort to reevaluate the HUAC’s Hollywood probes. This study assesses four areas in which the new evidence indicates significant, fresh findings. First, a detailed analysis of the Committee’s investigatory methods reveals that most of the HUAC’s information came from a careful, on-going analysis of the communist press, rather than techniques such as surveillance, wiretaps and other cloak and dagger activities. Second, the evidence shows the crucial role played by two brothers, both German communists living as refugees in America during World War II, in motivating the Committee to launch its first Hollywood probe.
    [Show full text]
  • MADE in HOLLYWOOD, CENSORED by BEIJING the U.S
    MADE IN HOLLYWOOD, CENSORED BY BEIJING The U.S. Film Industry and Chinese Government Influence Made in Hollywood, Censored by Beijing: The U.S. Film Industry and Chinese Government Influence 1 MADE IN HOLLYWOOD, CENSORED BY BEIJING The U.S. Film Industry and Chinese Government Influence TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION 1 REPORT METHODOLOGY 5 PART I: HOW (AND WHY) BEIJING IS 6 ABLE TO INFLUENCE HOLLYWOOD PART II: THE WAY THIS INFLUENCE PLAYS OUT 20 PART III: ENTERING THE CHINESE MARKET 33 PART IV: LOOKING TOWARD SOLUTIONS 43 RECOMMENDATIONS 47 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 53 ENDNOTES 54 Made in Hollywood, Censored by Beijing: The U.S. Film Industry and Chinese Government Influence MADE IN HOLLYWOOD, CENSORED BY BEIJING EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ade in Hollywood, Censored by Beijing system is inconsistent with international norms of Mdescribes the ways in which the Chinese artistic freedom. government and its ruling Chinese Communist There are countless stories to be told about China, Party successfully influence Hollywood films, and those that are non-controversial from Beijing’s warns how this type of influence has increasingly perspective are no less valid. But there are also become normalized in Hollywood, and explains stories to be told about the ongoing crimes against the implications of this influence on freedom of humanity in Xinjiang, the ongoing struggle of Tibetans expression and on the types of stories that global to maintain their language and culture in the face of audiences are exposed to on the big screen. both societal changes and government policy, the Hollywood is one of the world’s most significant prodemocracy movement in Hong Kong, and honest, storytelling centers, a cinematic powerhouse whose everyday stories about how government policies movies are watched by millions across the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • Sinner to Saint
    FINAL-1 Sat, Nov 4, 2017 7:23:54 PM Your Weekly Guide to TV Entertainment for the week of November 11 - 17, 2017 OLD FASHIONED SERVICE Sinner to saint FREE REGISTRY SERVICE Kimberly Hébert Gregoy and Jason Ritter star in “Kevin (Probably) Saves the World” Massachusetts’ First Credit Union In spite of his selfish past — or perhaps be- Located at 370 Highland Avenue, Salem John Doyle cause of it — Kevin Finn (Jason Ritter, “Joan of St. Jean's Credit Union INSURANCEDoyle Insurance AGENCY Arcadia”) sets out to make the world a better 3 x 3 Voted #1 1 x 3 place in “Kevin (Probably) Saves the World,” Serving over 15,000 Members • A Part of your Community since 1910 Insurance Agency airing Tuesday, Nov. 14, on ABC. All the while, a Supporting over 60 Non-Profit Organizations & Programs celestial being known as Yvette (Kimberly Hé- bert Gregory, “Vice Principals”) guides him on Serving the Employees of over 40 Businesses Auto • Homeowners his mission. JoAnna Garcia Swisher (“Once 978.219.1000 • www.stjeanscu.com Business • Life Insurance Upon a Time”) and India de Beaufort (“Veep”) Offices also located in Lynn, Newburyport & Revere 978-777-6344 also star. Federally Insured by NCUA www.doyleinsurance.com FINAL-1 Sat, Nov 4, 2017 7:23:55 PM 2 • Salem News • November 11 - 17, 2017 TV with soul: New ABC drama follows a man on a mission By Kyla Brewer find and anoint a new generation the Hollywood ranks with roles in With You,” and has a recurring role ma, but they hope “Kevin (Proba- TV Media of righteous souls.
    [Show full text]
  • SUING THEIR WAY INTO the NEWSROOM: HOW WOMEN at the DETROIT NEWS CHANGED JOURNALISM by AMANDA PALMEIRA
    SUING THEIR WAY INTO THE NEWSROOM: HOW WOMEN AT THE DETROIT NEWS CHANGED JOURNALISM by AMANDA PALMEIRA A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors in the Major in Journalism in the College of Sciences and in The Burnett Honors College at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Fall Term 2012 Thesis Chair: Dr. Kimberly Voss i © 2012 Amanda Palmeira ii ABSTRACT The women’s liberation movement in the 1970s and 1980s utilized various means for activism and demonstrations, but women also used the judicial system to fight for equality in the workplace. This study focuses specifically on the field of journalism and how female reporters used the courts to fight the gender discrimination that was widespread and unbridled before the creation of legislation that outlawed it. The lawsuit filed by Mary Lou Butcher and approximately 90 other women against The Detroit News is one such case that exemplifies the process of filing a gender discrimination lawsuit, as well as the events that led to the suits and the impact that it and similar lawsuits had on the field of journalism and the women’s liberation movement as a whole. Using textual analysis to examine the coverage of these lawsuits by industry literature and by the publications challenged by the lawsuits demonstrates what the field of newspapers and magazines was like during the time of the cases. Comparing the same media during the times of the lawsuits and post-settlement reveal how they contributed to an adjusted view of female journalists and aided women’s acceptance in American newsrooms.
    [Show full text]
  • Victims of the Mccarthy Era, in Support of Humanitarian Law Project, Et Al
    Nos. 08-1498 and 09-89 ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL., Petitioners, v. HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT, ET AL., Respondents. HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT, ET AL., Cross-Petitioners, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL., Respondents. ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE VICTIMS OF THE MCCARTHY ERA, IN SUPPORT OF HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT, ET AL. Stephen F. Rohde John A. Freedman Rohde & Victoroff (Counsel of Record) 1880 Century Park East Jonathan S. Martel Suite 411 Jeremy C. Karpatkin Los Angeles, CA 90067 Bassel C. Korkor (310) 277-1482 Sara K. Pildis ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 555 Twelfth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 (202) 942-5000 Attorneys for Amici Curiae - i - TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ................................ 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ..................................... 2 ARGUMENT ............................................................... 4 I. Americans Paid a Heavy Price For McCarthy Era Penalties on Speech and Association ............................................................ 4 II. The Supreme Court in the 1950s and 1960s Rejected McCarthy Era ‗Guilt by Association‘ Statutes as Impermissible ............... 9 A. AEDPA Penalizes the Relationship Between an Individual and a Designated Organization, in Violation of the Freedom of Association ................................................... 10 1. Congress Cannot Impose a ―Blanket Prohibition‖ on Association With Groups Having Legal and Illegal Aims .......................... 10 2. The Government Must Prove that Individuals Intend to Further the Illegal Aims of an Organization.......................................... 12 - ii - B. Like McCarthy Era Statutes, AEDPA Makes Constitutionally Protected Speech a Crime and is Unconstitutionally Vague, Chilling Free Speech .................................................. 14 1. AEDPA Unconstitutionally Penalizes Protected Speech in the Same Manner as McCarthy Era Laws ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Doherty, Thomas, Cold War, Cool Medium: Television, Mccarthyism
    doherty_FM 8/21/03 3:20 PM Page i COLD WAR, COOL MEDIUM TELEVISION, McCARTHYISM, AND AMERICAN CULTURE doherty_FM 8/21/03 3:20 PM Page ii Film and Culture A series of Columbia University Press Edited by John Belton What Made Pistachio Nuts? Early Sound Comedy and the Vaudeville Aesthetic Henry Jenkins Showstoppers: Busby Berkeley and the Tradition of Spectacle Martin Rubin Projections of War: Hollywood, American Culture, and World War II Thomas Doherty Laughing Screaming: Modern Hollywood Horror and Comedy William Paul Laughing Hysterically: American Screen Comedy of the 1950s Ed Sikov Primitive Passions: Visuality, Sexuality, Ethnography, and Contemporary Chinese Cinema Rey Chow The Cinema of Max Ophuls: Magisterial Vision and the Figure of Woman Susan M. White Black Women as Cultural Readers Jacqueline Bobo Picturing Japaneseness: Monumental Style, National Identity, Japanese Film Darrell William Davis Attack of the Leading Ladies: Gender, Sexuality, and Spectatorship in Classic Horror Cinema Rhona J. Berenstein This Mad Masquerade: Stardom and Masculinity in the Jazz Age Gaylyn Studlar Sexual Politics and Narrative Film: Hollywood and Beyond Robin Wood The Sounds of Commerce: Marketing Popular Film Music Jeff Smith Orson Welles, Shakespeare, and Popular Culture Michael Anderegg Pre-Code Hollywood: Sex, Immorality, and Insurrection in American Cinema, ‒ Thomas Doherty Sound Technology and the American Cinema: Perception, Representation, Modernity James Lastra Melodrama and Modernity: Early Sensational Cinema and Its Contexts Ben Singer
    [Show full text]
  • Super! Drama TV June 2021 ▶Programs Are Suspended for Equipment Maintenance from 1:00-6:00 on the 10Th
    Super! drama TV June 2021 ▶Programs are suspended for equipment maintenance from 1:00-6:00 on the 10th. Note: #=serial number [J]=in Japanese 2021.05.31 2021.06.01 2021.06.02 2021.06.03 2021.06.04 2021.06.05 2021.06.06 Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday 06:00 00 00 00 00 06:00 00 00 06:00 STINGRAY #27 STINGRAY #29 STINGRAY #31 STINGRAY #33 STINGRAY #35 STINGRAY #37 『DEEP HEAT』 『TITAN GOES POP』 『TUNE OF DANGER』 『THE COOL CAVE MAN』 『TRAPPED IN THE DEPTHS』 『A CHRISTMAS TO REMEMBER』 06:30 30 30 30 30 06:30 30 30 06:30 STINGRAY #28 STINGRAY #30 STINGRAY #32 STINGRAY #34 STINGRAY #36 STINGRAY #38 『IN SEARCH OF THE TAJMANON』 『SET SAIL FOR ADVENTURE』 『RESCUE FROM THE SKIES』 『A NUT FOR MARINEVILLE』 『EASTERN ECLIPSE』 『THE LIGHTHOUSE DWELLERS』 07:00 00 00 00 00 07:00 00 00 07:00 CRIMINAL MINDS Season 11 #19 CRIMINAL MINDS Season 11 #20 CRIMINAL MINDS Season 11 #21 CRIMINAL MINDS Season 11 #22 STAR TREK Season 1 #29 INSTINCT #5 『Tribute』 『Inner Beauty』 『Devil's Backbone』 『The Storm』 『Operation -- Annihilate!』 『Heartless』 07:30 07:30 07:30 08:00 00 00 00 00 08:00 00 00 08:00 MACGYVER Season 2 #12 MACGYVER Season 2 #13 MACGYVER Season 2 #14 MACGYVER Season 2 #15 MANHUNT: DEADLY GAMES #2 INSTINCT #6 『Mac + Jack』 『Co2 Sensor + Tree Branch』 『Mardi Gras Beads + Chair』 『Murdoc + Handcuffs』 『Unabubba』 『Flat Line』 08:30 08:30 08:30 09:00 00 00 00 00 09:00 00 00 09:00 information [J] information [J] information [J] information [J] information [J] information [J] 09:30 30 30 30 30 09:30 30 30 09:30 ZOEY'S EXTRAORDINARY PLAYLIST MANHUNT:
    [Show full text]
  • And Marxism in Pre-Blacklist Hollywood
    Introduction Contextualizing the tension between the ‘American Dream’ and Marxism in pre-blacklist Hollywood The relationship between labour and capital in Hollywood was never noted for its harmony. Nevertheless, the class conflict within the American film industry usually resulted in workable compromises, albeit within a political framework limited by the prohibitive moral strictures of the Production Code of 1935 and the Motion Pictures Association of America (MPAA). Even the establishment of the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC) in 1938, known as the Dies Committee after its first chairman Martin Dies Jr. (D-TX), did not significantly alter the uneasy co-existence between the Hollywood Left talent and old studio moguls. That is, not before the post-war reincarnation of HUAC, which left no room for political compromise: from 1947, the Committee went after Hollywood in earnest. Sometimes referred to as the Second Red Scare – the first followed the Russian Revolution – the political repression that followed in its wake is more commonly associated with Joseph McCarthy, a junior congressman from Wisconsin, who spearheaded the government attack on any political and cultural manifestation of un-Americanism (more precisely, anti-capitalism). This unconstitutional attack on freedom of expression at the hands of the Congress marked a watershed not only in the relationship between labour and capital in Hollywood, but in the evolution of the dominant political aesthetics of American cinema. Thirty years ago, film 1 historian Richard
    [Show full text]
  • Background Guide for Elaboration on This System and Its History
    1 Note from the Crisis Director Hello delegates! My name is Amelia Benich and I’ll be your CD for FCMUN. I am ecstatic to finally get to run this JCC and I hope you are as excited as I am. This is my final FCMUN as I graduate in May and I am determined to make it the best crisis committee to ever be run...or close. I have done Model UN every year I have been in college and have been in so many crisis committees as a delegate I recently had to be reminded of all of them. With this experience both as a delegate and having run 3 committees before both at FCMUN and abroad at LSE’s conference, I can assure you I’ve seen it all and am preparing to stop the common committee frustrations before they begin. As you prepare for the conference, I want you to be fully aware of the parameters of our note system before you plan out a crisis arc. Electronic notes will speed things up, however for this committee to keep things running smoothly, there will be an approximate word limit for notes. Try to keep all notes around 250 words or less (about two paragraphs/a page double spaced), and expect each committee session to get approximately 3 notes answered, meaning your crisis arc should be accomplished in 12-15 notes, assuming notes get shorter and more direct towards the end. Of course, I will do my best to answer faster and get more notes through, but this is to help you both plan effectively and also stay engaged in-room as well.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of VAASA School of Marketing and Communication
    UNIVERSITY OF VAASA School of Marketing and Communication Master’s Degree Programme in Comparative Cultural Studies Taija Solin The Concierge of Crime Representation of Manipulation in the Character Raymond Reddington in The Blacklist Master’s Thesis in English Studies Vaasa 2020 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT 4 1 INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 Aim and Research Question 8 1.2 Material Acquisition 9 1.3 The Blacklist Overview 9 1.4 Structure of the Thesis 12 2 MANIPULATION 13 2.1 Defining Manipulation 14 2.2 Manipulation Tactics 17 2.3 Covert-Aggressive Personality Type 24 2.4 Exploitable Vulnerabilities 28 2.5 Representation of Manipulation 29 3 THE CONCIERGE OF CRIME 32 3.1 Surroundings and Appearances 32 3.2 The Good Guy Reddington 35 3.3 Reddington, The Manipulator 36 4 REDDINGTON’S MANIPULATIVE BEHAVIOUR 44 4.1 Seduction 46 4.2 Lying 50 4.3 Weaponised Attention 54 4.4 Diversion 56 2 4.5 Evasion 58 4.6 Covert Intimidation 61 4.7 Guilt Tripping 63 4.8 Manipulative Giving 65 4.9 Manipulation Through Others 69 4.10 The Benjamin Franklin Effect 71 4.11 Provocation 73 5 CONCLUSION 75 WORKS CITED 77 3 4 UNIVERSITY OF VAASA School of Marketing and Communication Author: Taija Johanna Solin Master’s Thesis: The Concierge of Crime Representation of Manipulation in the Character Ray- mond Reddington in The Blacklist Degree: Master of Arts Programme: Comparative Cultural Studies Date: 2020 Supervisor: Helen Mäntymäki ABSTRACT Manipulaation ja manipulatiivisen henkilön representaatiosta fiktiossa on tehty yllättävän vähän tutkimustyötä, vaikka niiden vaikutus ja tärkeys tarinan kulkuun sekä hahmojen henkilökemiaan on selkeästi havaittavissa.
    [Show full text]