DOCSLIB.ORG

CLINICAL REVIEW(S) Clinical Review David H

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CLINICAL REVIEW(S) Clinical Review David H CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 209830Orig1s000 CLINICAL REVIEW(S) Clinical Review David H. Millis, MD NDA 209830 Aripiprazole lauroxil / Aristada Initio CLINICAL REVIEW Application Type NDA Application Number(s) 209830 Priority or Standard Standard Submit Date(s) August 31, 2017 Received Date(s) August 31, 2017 PDUFA Goal Date June 30, 2018 Division/Office Division of Psychiatry Products Reviewer Name(s) David H. Millis, MD Review Completion Date June 28, 2018 Established/Proper Name aripiprazole lauroxil (Proposed) Trade Name Aristada Initio Applicant Alkermes Dosage Form(s) intramuscular Applicant Proposed Dosing 675 mg single intramuscular injection Regimen(s) Applicant Proposed initiation of treatment of schizophrenia with Aristada Indication(s)/Population(s) Recommendation on Approve Regulatory Action Recommended initiation of treatment of schizophrenia with Aristada Indication(s)/Population(s) (if applicable) 1 Reference ID: 4284747 Clinical Review David H. Millis, MD NDA 209830 Aripiprazole lauroxil / Aristada Initio Table of Contents Glossary ........................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 9 Product Introduction ........................................................................................................ 9 Conclusions on the Substantial Evidence of Effectiveness ............................................ 10 Benefit-Risk Assessment ................................................................................................ 10 Patient Experience Data ................................................................................................. 15 2. Therapeutic Context .............................................................................................................. 16 Analysis of Condition ...................................................................................................... 16 Analysis of Current Treatment Options ......................................................................... 16 3. Regulatory Background ......................................................................................................... 17 U.S. Regulatory Actions and Marketing History ............................................................. 17 Summary of Presubmission/Submission Regulatory Activity ........................................ 17 Foreign Regulatory Actions and Marketing History ....................................................... 18 4. Significant Issues from Other Review Disciplines Pertinent to Clinical Conclusions on Efficacy and Safety................................................................................................................. 18 Office of Scientific Investigations (OSI) .......................................................................... 18 Product Quality .............................................................................................................. 18 Clinical Microbiology ...................................................................................................... 19 Nonclinical Pharmacology/Toxicology ........................................................................... 19 Clinical Pharmacology .................................................................................................... 20 Devices and Companion Diagnostic Issues .................................................................... 21 Consumer Study Reviews ............................................................................................... 21 5. Sources of Clinical Data and Review Strategy ....................................................................... 21 Clinical Studies ................................................................................................................ 22 Review Strategy .............................................................................................................. 22 6. Review of Relevant Individual Trials Used to Support Efficacy ............................................. 22 Study ALK9072-B101 (short name: B101) ...................................................................... 22 Study Design............................................................................................................ 22 2 Reference ID: 4284747 Clinical Review David H. Millis, MD NDA 209830 Aripiprazole lauroxil / Aristada Initio Study Results ........................................................................................................... 27 Study ALK9072-B102 (short name: B102) ...................................................................... 29 Study Design............................................................................................................ 29 Study Results ........................................................................................................... 35 Study ALK9072-B103 (short name: B103) ...................................................................... 39 Study Design............................................................................................................ 39 Study Results ........................................................................................................... 42 7. Integrated Review of Effectiveness ....................................................................................... 44 Assessment of Efficacy Across Trials .............................................................................. 44 8. Review of Safety .................................................................................................................... 44 Safety Review Approach ................................................................................................ 44 Review of the Safety Database ...................................................................................... 45 Overall Exposure ..................................................................................................... 45 Relevant characteristics of the safety population:................................................. 46 Adequacy of the safety database: .......................................................................... 48 Adequacy of Applicant’s Clinical Safety Assessments .................................................... 48 Issues Regarding Data Integrity and Submission Quality ....................................... 48 Categorization of Adverse Events ........................................................................... 49 Routine Clinical Tests .............................................................................................. 49 Safety Results ................................................................................................................. 49 Deaths ..................................................................................................................... 49 Serious Adverse Events ........................................................................................... 50 Dropouts and/or Discontinuations Due to Adverse Effects ................................... 51 Significant Adverse Events ...................................................................................... 52 Treatment Emergent Adverse Events and Adverse Reactions ............................... 52 Laboratory Findings ................................................................................................ 56 Vital Signs ................................................................................................................ 61 Electrocardiograms (ECGs) ...................................................................................... 62 QT ............................................................................................................................ 62 Immunogenicity ............................................................................................... 64 3 Reference ID: 4284747 Clinical Review David H. Millis, MD NDA 209830 Aripiprazole lauroxil / Aristada Initio Analysis of Submission-Specific Safety Issues ................................................................ 64 Injection Site Reactions ........................................................................................... 64 Abnormal Movement Scales ................................................................................... 65 Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale .................................................................. 65 Safety Analyses by Demographic Subgroups ................................................................. 66 Specific Safety Studies/Clinical Trials ............................................................................. 66 Additional Safety Explorations ....................................................................................... 66 Human Carcinogenicity or Tumor Development .................................................... 66 Human Reproduction and Pregnancy ..................................................................... 66 Pediatrics and Assessment of Effects on Growth ................................................... 66 Overdose, Drug Abuse Potential, Withdrawal, and Rebound ................................ 66 Safety in the Postmarket Setting.................................................................................... 66 Safety
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Original Research Published, Reproduced, Transmitted, Modified, Posted, Sold, Licensed, Or Used for Commercial Purposes
    This work may not be copied, distributed, displayed, Original Research published, reproduced, transmitted, modified, posted, sold, licensed, or used for commercial purposes. By downloading this file, you are agreeing to the Efficacy and Effectiveness of Depot publisher’s Terms & Conditions. Versus Oral Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia: Synthesizing Results Across Different Research Designs Noam Y. Kirson, PhD; Peter J. Weiden, MD; Sander Yermakov, MS; Wayne Huang, MPP; Thomas Samuelson, BA; Steve J. Offord, PhD; Paul E. Greenberg, MS, MA; and Bruce J. O. Wong, MD ABSTRACT he cornerstone of long-term maintenance therapy Objective: Nonadherence is a major challenge in schizophrenia Tof schizophrenia patients is relapse prevention. treatment. While long-acting (depot) antipsychotic medications are Relapse prevention is necessary—albeit not sufficient— often recommended to address adherence problems, evidence on for eventual successful rehabilitation.1 In practice, the the comparative effectiveness of depot versus oral antipsychotics is effectiveness of maintenance antipsychotic treatment is inconsistent. We hypothesize that this inconsistency could be due to often undermined by poor adherence to therapy. Not systematic differences in study design. This review evaluates the effect only is nonadherence the single greatest modifiable of study design on the comparative effectiveness of antipsychotic risk factor for relapse,2,3 it is also often undetected, formulations. The optimal use of different antipsychotic formulations resulting in lost opportunities to employ psychosocial in a general clinical setting depends on better understanding of the underlying reasons for differences in effectiveness across research interventions for adherence, as well as uncertainty as designs. to the relative contribution of lack of efficacy versus Data Sources: A PubMed literature review targeted English-language adherence problems to poor outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of Psychosis: 30 Years of Progress
    Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics (2006) 31, 523–534 REVIEW ARTICLE Treatment of psychosis: 30 years of progress I. R. De Oliveira* MD PhD andM.F.Juruena MD *Department of Neuropsychiatry, School of Medicine, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil and Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College, University of London, London, UK phrenia. Thirty years ago, psychiatrists had few SUMMARY neuroleptics available to them. These were all Background: Thirty years ago, psychiatrists had compounds, today known as conventional anti- only a few choices of old neuroleptics available to psychotics, and all were liable to cause severe extra them, currently defined as conventional or typical pyramidal side-effects (EPS). Nowadays, new antipsychotics, as a result schizophrenics had to treatments are more ambitious, aiming not only to suffer the severe extra pyramidal side effects. improve psychotic symptoms, but also quality of Nowadays, new treatments are more ambitious, life and social reinsertion. We briefly but critically aiming not only to improve psychotic symptoms, outline the advances in diagnosis and treatment but also quality of life and social reinsertion. Our of schizophrenia, from the mid 1970s up to the objective is to briefly but critically review the present. advances in the treatment of schizophrenia with antipsychotics in the past 30 years. We conclude DIAGNOSIS OF SCHIZOPHRENIA that conventional antipsychotics still have a place when just the cost of treatment, a key factor in Up until the early 1970s, schizophrenia diagnoses poor regions, is considered. The atypical anti- remained debatable. The lack of uniform diagnostic psychotic drugs are a class of agents that have criteria led to relative rates of schizophrenia being become the most widely used to treat a variety of very different, for example, in New York and psychoses because of their superiority with London, as demonstrated in an important study regard to extra pyramidal symptoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Minimum Laboratory Monitoring for Psychotropic Medications
    Minimum Laboratory Monitoring For Psychotropic Medications ANTIPSYCHOTIC MEDICATIONS GENERIC BRAND GENERIC BRAND Aripiprazole Abilify, Abilify Olanzapine Zyprexa, Zyprexa Zydis Maintena, Aristada Asenapine Saphris Paliperidone Invega, Invega Sustenna, Invega Trinza Brexpiprazole Rexulti Perphenazine Trilafon Cariprazine Vraylar Pimozide Orap Chlorpromazine Thorazine Quetiapine Seroquel, Seroquel XR Clozapine Clozaril, Fazaclo Risperidone Risperdal, Risperdal Consta, Risperdal M Tabs Fluphenazine, Fluphenazine D Prolixin, Prolixin D Thioridazine Mellaril Haloperidol, Haloperidol D Haldol, Haldol D Thiothixene Navane Iloperidone Fanapt Trifluoperazine Stelazine Loxapine Loxitane Ziprasidone Geodon Lurasidone Latuda MONITORING ANTIPSYCHOTIC FREQUENCY OF MONITORING AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) On initiation of any antipsychotic medication and at least every six months thereafter, or more frequently as clinically indicated. ABDOMINAL GIRTH (>18 years old) For individuals at least 18 years old, on initiation of any medication and at least every six months thereafter, or more frequently as clinically indicated. WEIGHT & BODY MASS INDEX (BMI) On initiation of any medication and at least every six months thereafter, or more frequently as clinically indicated. HEART RATE & BLOOD PRESSSURE On initiation of any medication and at least every six months thereafter, or more frequently as clinically indicated. COMPREHENSIVE METABOLIC PANEL (CMP), On initiation of any medication affecting this parameter and at least annually LIPIDS, FASTING
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Use Evaluation: Antipsychotic Utilization in Schizophrenia Patients
    © Copyright 2012 Oregon State University. All Rights Reserved Drug Use Research & Management Program Oregon State University, 500 Summer Street NE, E35 Salem, Oregon 97301-1079 Phone 503-947-5220 | Fax 503-947-1119 Drug Use Evaluation: Antipsychotic Utilization in Schizophrenia Patients Research Questions: 1. How many schizophrenia patients are prescribed recommended first-line second-generation treatments for schizophrenia? 2. How many schizophrenia patients switch to an injectable antipsychotic after stabilization on an oral antipsychotic? 3. How many schizophrenia patients are prescribed 2 or more concomitant antipsychotics? 4. Are claims for long-acting injectable antipsychotics primarily billed as pharmacy or physician administered claims? 5. Does adherence to antipsychotic therapy differ between patients with claims for different routes of administration (oral vs. long-acting injectable)? Conclusions: In total, 4663 schizophrenia patients met inclusion criteria, and approximately 14% of patients (n=685) were identified as treatment naïve without claims for antipsychotics in the year before their first antipsychotic prescription. Approximately 45% of patients identified as treatment naïve had a history of remote antipsychotic use, but it is unclear if antipsychotics were historically prescribed for schizophrenia. Oral second-generation antipsychotics which are recommended as first-line treatment in the MHCAG schizophrenia algorithm were prescribed as initial treatment in 37% of treatment naive patients and 28% of all schizophrenia patients. Recommended agents include risperidone, paliperidone, and aripiprazole. Utilization of parenteral antipsychotics was limited in patients with schizophrenia. Overall only 8% of patients switched from an oral to an injectable therapy within 6 months of their first claim. Approximately, 60% of all schizophrenia patients (n=2512) had claims for a single antipsychotic for at least 12 continuous weeks and may be eligible to transition to a long-acting injectable antipsychotic.
    [Show full text]
  • Schizophrenia Care Guide
    August 2015 CCHCS/DHCS Care Guide: Schizophrenia SUMMARY DECISION SUPPORT PATIENT EDUCATION/SELF MANAGEMENT GOALS ALERTS Minimize frequency and severity of psychotic episodes Suicidal ideation or gestures Encourage medication adherence Abnormal movements Manage medication side effects Delusions Monitor as clinically appropriate Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome Danger to self or others DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA/EVALUATION (PER DSM V) 1. Rule out delirium or other medical illnesses mimicking schizophrenia (see page 5), medications or drugs of abuse causing psychosis (see page 6), other mental illness causes of psychosis, e.g., Bipolar Mania or Depression, Major Depression, PTSD, borderline personality disorder (see page 4). Ideas in patients (even odd ideas) that we disagree with can be learned and are therefore not necessarily signs of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia is a world-wide phenomenon that can occur in cultures with widely differing ideas. 2. Diagnosis is made based on the following: (Criteria A and B must be met) A. Two of the following symptoms/signs must be present over much of at least one month (unless treated), with a significant impact on social or occupational functioning, over at least a 6-month period of time: Delusions, Hallucinations, Disorganized Speech, Negative symptoms (social withdrawal, poverty of thought, etc.), severely disorganized or catatonic behavior. B. At least one of the symptoms/signs should be Delusions, Hallucinations, or Disorganized Speech. TREATMENT OPTIONS MEDICATIONS Informed consent for psychotropic
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Side Effects of Antipsychotics
    Management of side effects of antipsychotics Oliver Freudenreich, MD, FACLP Co-Director, MGH Schizophrenia Program www.mghcme.org Disclosures I have the following relevant financial relationship with a commercial interest to disclose (recipient SELF; content SCHIZOPHRENIA): • Alkermes – Consultant honoraria (Advisory Board) • Avanir – Research grant (to institution) • Janssen – Research grant (to institution), consultant honoraria (Advisory Board) • Neurocrine – Consultant honoraria (Advisory Board) • Novartis – Consultant honoraria • Otsuka – Research grant (to institution) • Roche – Consultant honoraria • Saladax – Research grant (to institution) • Elsevier – Honoraria (medical editing) • Global Medical Education – Honoraria (CME speaker and content developer) • Medscape – Honoraria (CME speaker) • Wolters-Kluwer – Royalties (content developer) • UpToDate – Royalties, honoraria (content developer and editor) • American Psychiatric Association – Consultant honoraria (SMI Adviser) www.mghcme.org Outline • Antipsychotic side effect summary • Critical side effect management – NMS – Cardiac side effects – Gastrointestinal side effects – Clozapine black box warnings • Routine side effect management – Metabolic side effects – Motor side effects – Prolactin elevation • The man-in-the-arena algorithm www.mghcme.org Receptor profile and side effects • Alpha-1 – Hypotension: slow titration • Dopamine-2 – Dystonia: prophylactic anticholinergic – Akathisia, parkinsonism, tardive dyskinesia – Hyperprolactinemia • Histamine-1 – Sedation – Weight gain
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of Precautions Asenapine Maleate, Aripiprazole, Olanzapine
    Published by Translated by Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency This English version is intended to be a reference material to provide convenience for users. In the event of inconsistency between the Japanese original and this English translation, the former shall prevail. Revision of Precautions Asenapine maleate, aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine fumarate, clocapramine hydrochloride hydrate, chlorpromazine hydrochloride, chlorpromazine hydrochloride/promethazine hydrochloride/phenobarbital, chlorpromazine phenolphthalinate, spiperone, zotepine, timiperone, haloperidol, paliperidone, pipamperone hydrochloride, fluphenazine decanoate, fluphenazine maleate, brexpiprazole, prochlorperazine maleate, prochlorperazine mesilate, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency Office of Safety I 3-3-2 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0013 Japan E-mail: [email protected] Published by Translated by Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency This English version is intended to be a reference material to provide convenience for users. In the event of inconsistency between the Japanese original and this English translation, the former shall prevail. propericiazine, bromperidol, perphenazine, perphenazine hydrochloride, perphenazine fendizoate, perphenazine maleate, perospirone hydrochloride hydrate, mosapramine hydrochloride, risperidone (oral drug), levomepromazine hydrochloride, levomepromazine maleate March 27, 2018 Non-proprietary name Asenapine maleate,
    [Show full text]
  • Current P SYCHIATRY
    Current p SYCHIATRY N ew Investigators Tips to manage and prevent discontinuation syndromes Informed tapering can protect patients when you stop a medication Sriram Ramaswamy, MD Shruti Malik, MBBS, MHSA Vijay Dewan, MD Instructor, department of psychiatry Foreign medical graduate Assistant professor Creighton University Department of psychiatry Omaha, NE University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, NE bruptly stopping common psychotropics New insights on psychotropic A —particularly antidepressants, benzodi- drug safety and side effects azepines, or atypical antipsychotics—can trigger a discontinuation syndrome, with: This paper was among those entered in the 2005 • rebound or relapse of original symptoms Promising New Investigators competition sponsored • uncomfortable new physical and psycho- by the Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome Information Service (NMSIS). The theme of this year’s competition logical symptoms was “New insights on psychotropic drug safety and • physiologic withdrawal at times. side effects.” To increase health professionals’ awareness of URRENT SYCHIATRY 1 C P is honored to publish this peer- the risk of these adverse effects, this article reviewed, evidence-based article on a clinically describes discontinuation syndromes associated important topic for practicing psychiatrists. with various psychotropics and offers strategies to NMSIS is dedicated to reducing morbidity and anticipate, recognize, and manage them. mortality of NMS by improving medical and psychiatric care of patients with heat-related disorders; providing
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Major Depressive Disorder Clinical Practice Guidelines May 2014
    Federal Bureau of Prisons Management of Major Depressive Disorder Clinical Practice Guidelines May 2014 Table of Contents 1. Purpose ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Natural History ................................................................................................................................. 2 Special Considerations ...................................................................................................................... 2 3. Screening ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Screening Questions .......................................................................................................................... 3 Further Screening Methods................................................................................................................ 4 4. Diagnosis ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Depression: Three Levels of Severity ............................................................................................... 4 Clinical Interview and Documentation of Risk Assessment...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Is Aristada (Aripiprazole Lauroxil) a Safe and Effective Treatment for Schizophrenia in Adult Patients? Kyle J
    Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine DigitalCommons@PCOM PCOM Physician Assistant Studies Student Student Dissertations, Theses and Papers Scholarship 2017 Is Aristada (Aripiprazole Lauroxil) a Safe and Effective Treatment For Schizophrenia In Adult Patients? Kyle J. Knowles Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pcom.edu/pa_systematic_reviews Part of the Psychiatry Commons Recommended Citation Knowles, Kyle J., "Is Aristada (Aripiprazole Lauroxil) a Safe and Effective Treatment For Schizophrenia In Adult Patients?" (2017). PCOM Physician Assistant Studies Student Scholarship. 381. https://digitalcommons.pcom.edu/pa_systematic_reviews/381 This Selective Evidence-Based Medicine Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Dissertations, Theses and Papers at DigitalCommons@PCOM. It has been accepted for inclusion in PCOM Physician Assistant Studies Student Scholarship by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@PCOM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Is Aristada (Aripiprazole Lauroxil) a Safe and Effective Treatment For Schizophrenia In Adult Patients? Kyle J. Knowles, PA-S A SELECTIVE EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE REVIEW In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For The Degree of Master of Science In Health Sciences- Physician Assistant Department of Physician Assistant Studies Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine Philadelphia, Pennsylvania December 16, 2016 ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: The objective of this selective EBM review is to determine whether or not “Is Aristada (aripiprazole lauroxil) a safe and effective treatment for schizophrenia in adult patients?” STUDY DESIGN: Review of three randomized controlled studies. All three trials were conducted between 2014 and 2015. DATA SOURCES: One randomized, controlled trial and two randomized, controlled, double- blind trials found via Cochrane Library and PubMed.
    [Show full text]
  • Antipsychotic Combinations
    Graylands Hospital DRUG BULLETIN Pharmacy Department Brockway Road Mount Claremont WA 6010 Telephone (08) 9347 6400 Email [email protected] Fax (08) 9384 4586 Antipsychotic Combinations Graylands Hospital Drug Bulletin 2008 Vol. 15 No. 3 February ISSN 1323-1251 Antipsychotic combinations Reasons for antipsychotic combinations Despite the development of efficacious medications for the treatment of schizophrenia, many people do There are a number of theoretical benefits and not respond adequately. To address this problem, reasons cited for antipsychotic combination the use of two or more antipsychotics simultaneously prescribing, these include: is a commonly employed treatment strategy. Although the use of combination antipsychotics is Complementary mechanisms of action4 (e.g. common in clinical practice, the risks and benefits adding an antipsychotic with strong dopamine have not been systematically evaluated to date. As a D2 blockade to a weak D2 blocker) result, current Australian treatment algorithms Partial replacement of antipsychotic action for including the Royal Australian and New Zealand drugs with intolerable adverse effects at higher College of Psychiatry Schizophrenia Guidelines and 5 doses (e.g. adding quetiapine to clozapine to the Western Australian Therapeutic Advisory Group minimise metabolic adverse effects) Antipsychotic Guidelines advise against the use of combined antipsychotics, except for short periods of Alternative where clozapine cannot be used6 changeover1,2. Most data on antipsychotic
    [Show full text]
  • Haloperidol Injection, USP and 3) Treatment of Any Concomitant Serious Medical Problems for Which Specific Treatments Are Available
    drugs not essential to concurrent therapy, 2) intensive symptomatic treatment and medical monitoring, Haloperidol Injection, USP and 3) treatment of any concomitant serious medical problems for which specific treatments are available. (For Immediate Release) There is no general agreement about specific pharmacological treatment regimens for uncomplicated NMS. Rx only If a patient requires antipsychotic drug treatment after recovery from NMS, the potential reintroduction of drug therapy should be carefully considered. The patient should be carefully monitored, since recurrences WARNING of NMS have been reported. Increased Mortality in Elderly Patients with Dementia-Related Psychosis: Hyperpyrexia and heat stroke, not associated with the above symptom complex, have also been reported Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an in- with haloperidol. creased risk of death. Analyses of seventeen placebo-controlled trials (modal duration of 10 weeks), Usage in Pregnancy largely in patients taking atypical antipsychotic drugs, revealed a risk of death in drug-treated pa- Rodents given 2 to 20 times the usual maximum human dose of haloperidol by oral or parenteral routes tients of between 1.6 to 1.7 times the risk of death in placebo-treated patients. Over the course of showed an increase in incidence of resorption, reduced fertility, delayed delivery and pup mortality. No a typical 10-week controlled trial, the rate of death in drug-treated patients was about 4.5%, com- teratogenic effect has been reported in rats, rabbits or dogs at dosages within this range, but cleft palate pared to a rate of about 2.6% in the placebo group.
    [Show full text]