Xanthomonas in Florida

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Xanthomonas in Florida MULTI-LOCUS AND WHOLE-GENOME SEQUENCE ANALYSIS OF PSEUDOMONADS AND XANTHOMONADS IMPACTING TOMATO PRODUCTION IN FLORIDA By SUJAN TIMILSINA A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2016 © 2016 Sujan Timilsina To my Family ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to take this opportunity to express my gratitude towards Dr. Gary E. Vallad, committee chair and Dr. Jeffrey B. Jones, co-chair, for their constant support, encouragement and guidance throughout my graduate studies. I couldn’t have done this without their scientific inputs and personal mentorship. I would also like to thank Dr. Erica M. Goss for all her advice, recommendations and support. I would also like to extend my gratitude to my committee members, Dr. Bryan Kolaczkowski and Dr. Sam Hutton for their valuable suggestions and guidance. Very special thanks to Gerald V. Minsavage, for all his expertise, creativity, recommendations and constructive criticism. We collaborated with Dr. Frank White, Dr. Brian Staskawicz and Dr. Jim Preston for some aspects of my research and to write articles and reviews. I would like to thank them all for providing me the opportunity. During my PhD, I had the privilege to work with colleagues from the 2560 Jones lab in Gainesville and Vegetable Pathology lab in Balm and I thank the lab family. I appreciate the time and technical support from Dr. Neha Potnis. I thank my labmates Amanda Strayer, Juliana Pereira, Serhat Kara, Eric A. Newberry, Alberto Gochez, Yang Hu, and Deepak Shantaraj and numerous lab mates over the years for their co- operation and assistance. I would also like to thank all my Nepalese friends in Gainesville for their lively company during my stay here. I also want to thank my parents and brother, who helped me to shape my career. I specially thank my wife, Naweena, for her undying support, encouragement and patience. Thank you all for making this possible. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ 7 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... 8 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER 1 LITERATURE REVIEW .......................................................................................... 12 Pseudomonas in Florida ......................................................................................... 12 Pseudomonas Characterization .............................................................................. 13 Taxonomy of Pseudomonas ................................................................................... 13 Xanthomonas in Florida .......................................................................................... 14 Population Studies of Bacterial Spot Causing Xanthomonas Species .................... 16 Type III Secreted Effectors ..................................................................................... 17 Project Goals and Objectives .................................................................................. 19 2 PHYLOGENETIC STUDY REVEALS A DISTINCT PHYLOGROUP OF PSEUDOMONAS CICHORII IN FLORIDA ............................................................. 21 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 21 Materials and Methods............................................................................................ 23 Bacterial Strains and Isolation .......................................................................... 23 Pathogenicity Tests .......................................................................................... 23 PCR Amplification and Gene Sequencing ........................................................ 24 Phylogenetic Analysis ...................................................................................... 25 GenBank Accession Numbers .......................................................................... 26 Results .................................................................................................................... 26 Isolation and Phenotypic characterization ........................................................ 26 Pathogenicity Test ............................................................................................ 26 Genetic Characterization .................................................................................. 27 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 29 3 PSEUDOMONAS FLORIDAE SP. NOV., A NOVEL BACTERIAL PATHOGEN ISOLATED FROM TOMATO .................................................................................. 39 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 39 Materials and Methods............................................................................................ 41 Bacterial Strains and Preliminary Characterization .......................................... 41 Biochemical and Physiological Tests. .............................................................. 41 Pathogenicity Assay ......................................................................................... 42 5 Gene Sequencing and Sequence Analysis ...................................................... 42 Biolog Assay and Fatty Acid Profiles ................................................................ 43 Whole Genome Sequence Comparison ........................................................... 44 Results .................................................................................................................... 44 Bacterial Characterization ................................................................................ 44 Pathogenicity Assay ......................................................................................... 45 Sequence Analysis ........................................................................................... 45 Biolog Assay and FAME-ID .............................................................................. 46 Whole Genome Sequence Analysis ................................................................. 47 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 48 4 ANALYSIS OF SEQUENCED GENOMES OF XANTHOMONAS PERFORANS IDENTIFIES CANDIDATE TARGETS FOR RESISTANCE BREEDING IN TOMATO ................................................................................................................ 60 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 60 Materials and Methods............................................................................................ 65 Bacterial Strains Collection and Pathogenicity Testing .................................... 65 Gene Sequencing ............................................................................................. 65 Sequence Analysis ........................................................................................... 66 Sequence Submission ...................................................................................... 67 Results .................................................................................................................... 67 Pathogenicity and Race Determination ............................................................ 67 Grouping of T3 Strains by gapA Sequence ...................................................... 67 Effector Gene Sequences ................................................................................ 68 Presence of AvrBsT in T3 X. perforans ............................................................ 69 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 70 5 CORE GENOME MULTILOCUS SEQUENCE TYPING OF XANTHOMONAS PERFORANS ......................................................................................................... 87 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 87 Materials and Methods............................................................................................ 90 Bacterial Strains and Genome Sequencing ...................................................... 90 Multilocus Sequence Analysis .......................................................................... 91 Results .................................................................................................................... 93 Bacterial Strains and Multilocus Sequence Analysis ........................................ 93 Core Gene Comparisons .................................................................................. 93 Phylogenetic Analysis ...................................................................................... 95 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 96 6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION .........................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Pseudomonas Cichorii
    Plant Pathology Bulletin 15:275-285, 2006 Pseudomonas cichorii 1 1 1, 2 1 2 [email protected] 95 12 02 2006 Pseudomonas cichorii 15 275-285 60 (RAPD) Pseudomonas cichorii (Swingle) Stapp 1,100 bp Topo pCR®II-TOPO Pseudomonas cichorii SfL1/SfR2 (polymerase chain reaction, PCR) 379 bp 6 21 SfL1 / SfR2 P. cichorii DNA 5~10 pg 5.5~9 (P. cichorii) 10 6 cfu/ml 10 5~10 8 cfu/ml SfL1/ SfR2 P. cichorii 3 - 4 hr SfL1/SfR2 P. cichorii PCR Pseudomonas cichorii (3) (Swingle) Stapp P. cichorii (10) (13) (lettuce) (10) (27) (15) (33) (cabbage) (celery) (tomato) (14) (chrysanthemum) (16) (geranium) (16) (dwarf schefflera) (11) (sunflower) (22) (magnolia) (19) (5, 10) (5) (3) ( polymerase chain reaction PCR) (20) RFLP ( 276 15 4 2006 restriction fragment length polymorphism) AFLP RAPD PCR (amplified fragment length polymorphism) RAPD Table 1. Bacterial isolates used in experiments of RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA) (17, 18, 32) and PCR. Bacterium Strain Pseudomonas Burkholderia andropogonis Pan1 Pseudomonas B. caryophylli Tw7, Tw9 syringae pv. cannabina efe gene DNA B. gladioli pv. gladioli Bg ETH1 ETH2 ETH3 P. syringae pv. Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora Zan01~15 Ech10~22 cannabina P. syringae pv. glycinea P. syringae pv. Erwinia chrysanthemi Sr53~56 (24) phaseolicola P. Pantoea agglomerans Yx5, Yx7 syringae pv. atropurpurea cfl gene DNA Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pae Primer 1 Primer 2 P. syringae pv. glycinea P. P. cichorii Sf syringae pv. maculicola P. syringae pv. tomato P. fluorescens Pf (8) (30) P. putida Pu P. syringae pv. atropurpurea P. P. syringae pv.
    [Show full text]
  • Análise Comparativa E Funcional Do Genoma De Xanthomonas Citri Pv
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL RURAL PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO DE PERNAMBUCO EM FITOPATOLOGIA PRÓ-REITORIA DE PESQUISA E PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO Tese de Doutorado Análise comparativa e funcional do genoma de Xanthomonas citri pv. viticola: aplicação sobre virulência, patogenicidade e posicionamento taxonômico Antonio Roberto Gomes de Farias Recife - PE 2020 ANTONIO ROBERTO GOMES DE FARIAS ANÁLISE COMPARATIVA E FUNCIONAL DO GENOMA DE Xanthomonas citri pv. viticola: APLICAÇÃO SOBRE VIRULÊNCIA, PATOGENICIDADE E POSICIONAMENTO TAXONÔMICO Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Fitopatologia da Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de Doutor em Fitopatologia. COMITÊ DE ORIENTAÇÃO: Orientadora: Profa. Dra. Elineide Brarbosa de Souza Coorientadores: Prof. Dr. Marco Aurélio Siqueira da Gama Prof. Dr. Valdir de Quiroz Balbino RECIFE-PE Agosto - 2020 Dados Internacionais de Catalogação na Publicação Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco Sistema Integrado de Bibliotecas Gerada automaticamente, mediante os dados fornecidos pelo(a) autor(a) F224a Farias, Antonio Roberto Gomes de Análise comparativa e funcional do genoma de Xanthomonas citri pv. viticola: aplicação sobre virulência, patogenicidade e posicionamento taxonômico / Antonio Roberto Gomes de Farias. - 2020. 173 f. : il. Orientadora: Elineide Barbosa de Souza. Inclui referências e anexo(s). Tese (Doutorado) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Fitopatologia, Recife, 2020. 1. Vitis vinifera. 2. cancro bacteriano. 3. caracterização genômica. 4. filogenômica. 5. sistema de secreção. I. Souza, Elineide Barbosa de, orient. II. Título CDD 632 ANÁLISE COMPARATIVA E FUNCIONAL DO GENOMA DE Xanthomonas citri pv. viticola: APLICAÇÃO SOBRE VIRULÊNCIA, PATOGENICIDADE E POSICIONAMENTO TAXONÔMICO ANTONIO ROBERTO GOMES DE FARIAS Tese defendida e aprovada pela Banca Examinadora em: 24/08/2020 ORIENTADORA: ___________________________________________________________ Profa.
    [Show full text]
  • Increased Moisture Content of Propagation Media Enhances Bacterial Rot of Chrysanthemum
    Table 4, Effectiveness of chemical treatments to control leaf spot of basil when applied as protectants (Table 4). No sign of caused by Pseudomonas cichorii. phytotoxicity was seen on any of the sprayed plants under conditions of this experiment. However, to our knowledge, Plant rating2 neither has EPA registered for use on basil. Chemical Greenhouse Mist chamber Literature Cited Saline control 0.0 0.5 Inoculated control 8.0 9.5 1. Chase, A. R. and D. D. Brunk. 1984. Bacterial leaf incited by Streptomycin 0.5 0.0 Pseudomonas cichorii in Schefflera arboricola and some related plants. Copper-maneb 0.5 1.0 Plant Dis. 68:73-74. 2. Crockett, J. U. and O. Tanner. 1977. The Time-Life Encyclopedia of zRating based on 0-10 where 0 = no infection, 1 = 1- and 10 Gardening, Herbs. Time-Life Books, Alexandia, VA. 90-100%. Average of 3 replications. 3. Irey, M. S. 1980. Taxonomic value of the yellow pigment of the genus Xanthomonas. M.S. Thesis, Univ. Florida, Gainesville. showed that the disease level was much higher at high 4. King, E. O., M. K. Ward, and D. E. Raney. 1954. Two simple media moisture levels than at low moisture levels even at approx for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. J. Lab. Med. 44 imately equal temperature regimes (Table 3). This indi 301-307. 5. Klement, Z., G. L. Farkas, and I. Lovrekovich. 1964. Hypersensitive cates that high moisture levels favor severe disease de reaction induced by phytopathogenic bacteria in the tobacco leaf. velopment. Thus, keeping the foliage as dry as possible Phytopathology 54:474-477.
    [Show full text]
  • Fitness, Molecular Characterization and Management of Bacterial Leaf Spot in Tomatoes
    FITNESS, MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION AND MANAGEMENT OF BACTERIAL LEAF SPOT IN TOMATOES By PETER ABRAHAMIAN A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2017 © 2017 Peter Abrahamian ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my major advisor Dr. Gary Vallad for his extensive guidance, advising and help throughout my PhD studies. Dr. Vallad was always encouraging and supportive of pursuing new ideas. I also enjoyed all the times we discusses science. You are an awesome advisor! I also thank Dr. Jeffrey Jones my co-advisor for his extensive support, help and openness throughout my studies. I want to thank my committee members Drs. Erica Goss, Mathews Paret and Samuel Hutton for their constructive and insightful comments for improving the quality of my research. I would like to thank all the members of the Vallad Lab at GCREC. Thank you Ai-vy Riniker for being there for me when I first started working at Dr. Vallad’s lab. I also thank Rebecca Willis, Scott Hughes and Steve Kalb for their excellent technical help in securing, maintaining and harvesting tomato plants throughout the work conducted at GCREC. I also thank Dr. Aimen Wen, Heather Adkison and Late Wilson and my colleagues, Tyler Jacoby, Caroline Land, and Andy Shirley, for all the fun times and stimulating talks at the lab. Special thanks to Sujan Timilsina for all helping me with the bioinformatics work and to Sushmita KC for helping in collecting and processing samples in the field and greenhouse experiments.
    [Show full text]
  • 20640Edfcb19c0bfb828686027c
    FEMS Microbiology Reviews, fuz024, 44, 2020, 1–32 doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuz024 Advance Access Publication Date: 3 October 2019 Review article REVIEW ARTICLE Mechanistic insights into host adaptation, virulence and epidemiology of the phytopathogen Xanthomonas Shi-Qi An1, Neha Potnis2,MaxDow3,Frank-Jorg¨ Vorholter¨ 4, Yong-Qiang He5, Anke Becker6, Doron Teper7,YiLi8,9,NianWang7, Leonidas Bleris8,9,10 and Ji-Liang Tang5,* 1National Biofilms Innovation Centre (NBIC), Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK, 2Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Rouse Life Science Building, Auburn University, Auburn AL36849, USA, 3School of Microbiology, Food Science & Technology Building, University College Cork, Cork T12 K8AF, Ireland, 4MVZ Dr. Eberhard & Partner Dortmund, Brauhausstraße 4, Dortmund 44137, Germany, 5State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources, College of Life Science and Technology, Guangxi University, 100 Daxue Road, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, China, 6Loewe Center for Synthetic Microbiology and Department of Biology, Philipps-Universitat¨ Marburg, Hans-Meerwein-Straße 6, Marburg 35032, Germany, 7Citrus Research and Education Center, Department of Microbiology and Cell Science, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 700 Experiment Station Road, Lake Alfred 33850, USA, 8Bioengineering Department, University of Texas at Dallas, 2851 Rutford Ave, Richardson, TX 75080, USA, 9Center for Systems Biology, University of Texas at Dallas, 800 W Campbell Road, Richardson, TX 75080, USA and 10Department of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, 800 W Campbell Road, Richardson, TX75080, USA ∗Corresponding author: State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources, College of Life Science and Technology, Guangxi University, 100 Daxue Road, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, China.
    [Show full text]
  • Roq1 Mediates Recognition of the Xanthomonas and Pseudomonas Effector Proteins Xopq and Hopq1
    The Plant Journal (2017) 92, 787–795 doi: 10.1111/tpj.13715 Roq1 mediates recognition of the Xanthomonas and Pseudomonas effector proteins XopQ and HopQ1 Alex Schultink, Tiancong Qi, Arielle Lee, Adam D. Steinbrenner and Brian Staskawicz* Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA Received 2 July 2017; revised 30 August 2017; accepted 4 September 2017; published online 11 October 2017. *For correspondence (e-mail [email protected]). SUMMARY Xanthomonas spp. are phytopathogenic bacteria that can cause disease on a wide variety of plant species resulting in significant impacts on crop yields. Limited genetic resistance is available in most crop species and current control methods are often inadequate, particularly when environmental conditions favor dis- ease. The plant Nicotiana benthamiana has been shown to be resistant to Xanthomonas and Pseudomonas due to an immune response triggered by the bacterial effector proteins XopQ and HopQ1, respectively. We used a reverse genetic screen to identify Recognition of XopQ 1 (Roq1), a nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) protein with a Toll-like interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain, which mediates XopQ recognition in N. benthamiana. Roq1 orthologs appear to be present only in the Nicotiana genus. Expression of Roq1 was found to be sufficient for XopQ recognition in both the closely-related Nicotiana sylvestris and the dis- tantly-related beet plant (Beta vulgaris). Roq1 was found to co-immunoprecipitate with XopQ, suggesting a physical association between the two proteins. Roq1 is able to recognize XopQ alleles from various Xan- thomonas species, as well as HopQ1 from Pseudomonas, demonstrating widespread potential application in protecting crop plants from these pathogens.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Anti-Microbial Peptides of Xenorhabdus Origin Against Multidrug Resistant Plant Pathogens
    9 Novel Anti-Microbial Peptides of Xenorhabdus Origin Against Multidrug Resistant Plant Pathogens András Fodor1, Ildikó Varga1, Mária Hevesi2, Andrea Máthé-Fodor3, Jozsef Racsko4,5 and Joseph A. Hogan5 1Plant Protection Institute, Georgikon Faculty, University of Pannonia, Keszthely, 2Department of Pomology, Faculty of Horticultural Science, Corvinus University of Budapest Villányi út Budapest, 3Molecular and Cellular Imaging Center, Ohio State University (OARDC/OSU), OH, 4Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio State University (OARDC/OSU), OH, 5Valent Biosciences Corporation, 870 Technology Way, Libertyville, IL, 6Department of Animal Sciences, Ohio State University (OARDC/OSU) OH, 1,2Hungary 3,4,5,6USA 1. Introduction The discovery and introduction of antibiotics revolutionized the human therapy, the veterinary and plant medicines. Despite the spectacular results, several problems have occurred later on. Emergence of antibiotic resistance is an enormous clinical and public health concern. Spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (Ellington et al., 2010), emergence of extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacteriaceae (Pitout, 2008), carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (Schechner et al., 2009) and poly- resistant Pseudomonas (Strateva and Yordanov, 2009) and Acinetobacter (Vila et al., 2007) causes serious difficulties in the treatment of severe infections (Vila et al., 2007; Rossolini et al., 2007). A comprehensive strategy, a multidisciplinary effort is required to combat these infections. The new strategy includes compliance with infection control principles: antimicrobial stewardship and the development of new antimicrobial agents effective against multi-resistant gram-negative and gram-positive pathogens (Slama, 2008). During the last few decades, only a few new antibiotic classes reached the market (Fotinos et al., 2008). These facts highlight the need to develop new therapeutic strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Xanthomonads and Other Yellow-Pigmented Xanthomonas-Like Bacteria Associated with Tomato Seeds in Tanzania
    African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 11(78), pp. 14303-14312, 27 September, 2012 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB DOI:10.5897/AJB12.1305 ISSN 1684-5315 ©2012 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Xanthomonads and other yellow-pigmented Xanthomonas-like bacteria associated with tomato seeds in Tanzania E. R. Mbega1,2*, E. G. Wulff1, R. B. Mabagala2, J. Adriko1,3, O. S. Lund1 and C. N. Mortensen1 1Danish Seed Health Centre for Developing Countries, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. 2African Seed Health Centre, Department of Crop Science and Production, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania. 3National Agricultural Research Laboratories, Kawanda, Uganda. Accepted 3 August, 2012 Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seeds habour unique bacterial community that can be pathogenic or beneficial to their host. Xanthomonas causing bacterial leaf spot (BLSX) on tomato and other yellow- pigmented xanthomonads-like bacteria (XLB) that closely resemble BLSX were obtained from tomato seeds collected from Northern, Central and Southern highland regions of Tanzania. A total of 73 strains were isolated from 52 seed samples of 15 tomato cultivars. Results obtained with Biolog and sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA gene showed that samples originating from Central Tanzania harbored the most diverse populations of XLB and BLSX as compared to Northern and Southern Tanzania. The predominant bacterial genera in tomato seeds were Stenotrophomonas, Sphingomonas, Chryseobacterium, Xanthomonas, Pantoea and Flavobacterium. All strains identified by Biolog as Xanthomonas with exception of Xanthomonas campestris pv. malvacearum, were pathogenic on tomato and pepper plants. Strains identified by Biolog as Sphingomonas sanguinis and Sphingomonas terrae also incited black rot symptoms on pepper leaves.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Microbial Communities in the Phyllosphere Johan H.J
    Biology of the Plant Cuticle Edited by Markus Riederer, Caroline Müller Copyright © 2006 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd Biology of the Plant Cuticle Edited by Markus Riederer, Caroline Müller Copyright © 2006 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd 11 Microbial communities in the phyllosphere Johan H.J. Leveau 11.1 Introduction The term phyllosphere was coined by Last (1955) and Ruinen (1956) to describe the plant leaf surface as an environment that is physically, chemically and biologically distinct from the plant leaf itself or the air surrounding it. The term phylloplane has been used also, either instead of or in addition to the term phyllosphere. Its two- dimensional connotation, however, does not do justice to the three dimensions that characterise the phyllosphere from the perspective of many of its microscopic inhab- itants. On a global scale, the phyllosphere is arguably one of the largest biological surfaces colonised by microorganisms. Satellite images have allowed a conservative approximation of 4 × 108 km2 for the earth’s terrestrial surface area covered with foliage (Morris and Kinkel, 2002). It has been estimated that this leaf surface area is home to an astonishing 1026 bacteria (Morris and Kinkel, 2002), which are the most abundant colonisers of cuticular surfaces. Thus, the phyllosphere represents a significant refuge and resource of microorganisms on this planet. Often-used terms in phyllosphere microbiology are epiphyte and epiphytic (Leben, 1965; Hirano and Upper, 1983): here, microbial epiphytes or epiphytic microorganisms, which include bacteria, fungi and yeasts, are defined as being cap- able of surviving and thriving on plant leaf and fruit surfaces. Several excellent reviews on phyllosphere microbiology have appeared so far (Beattie and Lindow, 1995, 1999; Andrews and Harris, 2000; Hirano and Upper, 2000; Lindow and Leveau, 2002; Lindow and Brandl, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Field Manual of Diseases on Garden and Greenhouse Flowers Field Manual of Diseases on Garden and Greenhouse Flowers
    R. Kenneth Horst Field Manual of Diseases on Garden and Greenhouse Flowers Field Manual of Diseases on Garden and Greenhouse Flowers R. Kenneth Horst Field Manual of Diseases on Garden and Greenhouse Flowers R. Kenneth Horst Plant Pathology and Plant Microbe Biology Cornell University Ithaca, NY , USA ISBN 978-94-007-6048-6 ISBN 978-94-007-6049-3 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-6049-3 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London Library of Congress Control Number: 2013935122 © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, speci fi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on micro fi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied speci fi cally for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacteria-Killing Type IV Secretion Systems
    fmicb-10-01078 May 18, 2019 Time: 16:6 # 1 REVIEW published: 21 May 2019 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01078 Bacteria-Killing Type IV Secretion Systems Germán G. Sgro1†, Gabriel U. Oka1†, Diorge P. Souza1‡, William Cenens1, Ethel Bayer-Santos1‡, Bruno Y. Matsuyama1, Natalia F. Bueno1, Thiago Rodrigo dos Santos1, Cristina E. Alvarez-Martinez2, Roberto K. Salinas1 and Chuck S. Farah1* 1 Departamento de Bioquímica, Instituto de Química, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2 Departamento de Genética, Evolução, Microbiologia e Imunologia, Instituto de Biologia, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Edited by: Campinas, Brazil Ignacio Arechaga, University of Cantabria, Spain Reviewed by: Bacteria have been constantly competing for nutrients and space for billions of years. Elisabeth Grohmann, During this time, they have evolved many different molecular mechanisms by which Beuth Hochschule für Technik Berlin, to secrete proteinaceous effectors in order to manipulate and often kill rival bacterial Germany Xiancai Rao, and eukaryotic cells. These processes often employ large multimeric transmembrane Army Medical University, China nanomachines that have been classified as types I–IX secretion systems. One of the *Correspondence: most evolutionarily versatile are the Type IV secretion systems (T4SSs), which have Chuck S. Farah [email protected] been shown to be able to secrete macromolecules directly into both eukaryotic and †These authors have contributed prokaryotic cells. Until recently, examples of T4SS-mediated macromolecule transfer equally to this work from one bacterium to another was restricted to protein-DNA complexes during ‡ Present address: bacterial conjugation. This view changed when it was shown by our group that many Diorge P.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Study on the Management of Varnish Spot in Field and Hydroponic Lettuce
    Scoping study on the management of varnish spot in field and hydroponic lettuce Andrew Watson NSW Department of Primary Industries Project Number: VG03003 VG03003 This report is published by Horticulture Australia Ltd to pass on information concerning horticultural research and development undertaken for the vegetable industry. The research contained in this report was funded by Horticulture Australia Ltd with the financial support of the vegetable industry. All expressions of opinion are not to be regarded as expressing the opinion of Horticulture Australia Ltd or any authority of the Australian Government. The Company and the Australian Government accept no responsibility for any of the opinions or the accuracy of the information contained in this report and readers should rely upon their own enquiries in making decisions concerning their own interests. ISBN 0 7341 1146 0 Published and distributed by: Horticultural Australia Ltd Level 1 50 Carrington Street Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: (02) 8295 2300 Fax: (02) 8295 2399 E-Mail: [email protected] © Copyright 2005 VG 03003(June 2005) Scoping study on the management of varnish spot in field and hydroponic lettuce Andrew Watson NSW Department of Primary Industries. VG 03003 Andrew Watson NSW Department of Primary Industries National Vegetable Industry Centre Yanco, 2703. Phone 02 69 512611 Fax 02 69 512719 Email [email protected] Other members of the project team include; Tony Napier NSW Department of Primary Industries National Vegetable Industry Centre Yanco, 2703. This report covers the activities undertaken during the period of the project from July 2003 till June 2005. Other relevant material that was developed before the start date has also been included.
    [Show full text]