DOCSLIB.ORG

Consultation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Consultation Report Safety and Airspace Regulation Group REPLACEMENT OF CLASS F AIRSPACE IN UK FLIGHT INFORMATION REGIONS CONSULTATION REPORT Published by: Safety and Airspace Regulation Group Civil Aviation Authority CAA House 45 – 59 Kingsway London WC2B 6TE Replacement of Class F Airspace in the UK FIRs - Consultation Report Contents Page Number INTRODUCTION 1 CONSULTATION Conduct of the Consultation 1 Options Presented 1 Consultation Response Analysis 2 Key Issues and Themes 4 Modification of CAA Proposals 7 Addendum Consultation 7 Final Proposals for Change 10 Disestablishment of W2D 12 What the Proposed Changes do not Include 12 The Need for Class E+TMZ CONOPS 13 CAA Safety Buffer Policy 15 Environmental Impacts 15 Legislative Change 15 Target Implementation Date 15 Aeronautical Information Change 16 Implementation Awareness Activities 16 Summary of Project Milestones 16 ANNEXES A - Class F Airspace Replacement - Stakeholders A-1 B - Class F Airspace Replacement – Consultation Comment and B-1 Responses C - Summary of CAA Final Proposals for the Replacement of Class F C-1 Airspace in the UK FIRs ENCLOSURE Summary of CAA Final Proposals for the Replacement of Class F Airspace in the UK FIRs - map Replacement of Class F Airspace in the UK FIRs - Consultation Report 17 April 2014 Replacement of Class F Airspace in the UK FIRs - Consultation Report INTRODUCTION 1. On 8 April 2013, the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) launched a consultation on its proposals for the regularisation of all Class F ADRs as Class E airways that would additionally be notified as Transponder Mandatory airspace by the end of 2014. Such Regularisation was required in response to the findings of the ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme (USOAP) inspection of the UK conducted during February 2009 and consideration of the requirements of the Standardised European Rules of the Air. 2. As part of its consultation the CAA presented five options for the replacement of Class F airspace and presented a number of issues for consideration by stakeholders and invited comment on these. 3. The consultation was originally due to end on 12 July 2013, however this was extended to 26 July 2013 to allow stakeholders additional time to consider supplementary consultation material provided by the CAA. Comments from the consultation were examined in detail by CAA staff, which led the CAA to refine its proposals prior to notifying industry of its preferred way forward. 4. A supplementary consultation was undertaken between 8 October 2013 and 4 November 2013. This was necessary in order to take account of the need for additional Class E ‘fillets’ in the vicinity of the Aberdeen Control Zone/Control Area which had not been foreseen in the original consultation. 5. Comments from the supplementary consultation have also been considered in detail by CAA staff; these too led to further refinement of the proposed changes. Together these have informed the development of the CONOPS which will form the basis of operations within the subject airspace. 6. The purpose of this report is to inform industry of the outcomes of the consultations and of the proposed way forward with the replacement of Class F airspace in the UK FIRs. CONSULTATION Conduct of the Consultation 7. NATMAC members plus selected additional stakeholders were directly consulted. In addition, general public consultation was undertaken by means of publishing the consultation material on the CAA website; this approach applied to both initial and addendum consultations and attracted a number of unsolicited responses. In support of the addendum consultation, NATS Aberdeen undertook to brief affected local airspace users and service providers. A list of identified stakeholders is at Annex A (individual members of the public who submitted unsolicited comments are not listed, however their comments are incorporated into the collation of consultation comments and CAA responses at Annex B). 8. The purpose of the consultation was to seek industry comment on the CAA’s proposals and to refine these accordingly prior to their implementation. Such refinement would result in the disestablishment of certain ADRs or their reclassification to a more appropriate classification of airspace. Options Presented 9. Five options for the replacement of Class F airspace were presented to stakeholders in the initial consultation: Replacement of Class F Airspace in the UK FIRs - Consultation Report 17 April 2014 Page 1 of 16 Replacement of Class F Airspace in the UK FIRs - Consultation Report a. Option 1 - Do Nothing. b. Option 2 - Replacement of all existing Class F airspace by controlled airspace (CAS), i.e. Classes A-E. c. Option 3 - Replacement of all existing Class F airspace by Class G airspace. d. Option 4 - Replacement of all existing Class F airspace by CAS and Class G on a case by case basis. e. Option 5 - Replacement of all existing Class F airspace by Class E airspace designated Transponder Mandatory airspace in accordance with CAA Directorate of Airspace Policy (DAP) policy for Transponder Mandatory Zones (TMZs), without increase to the lateral or vertical dimensions of current ADRs. Where justified, and in exceptional circumstances, reduce vertical limits, disestablish specific ADRs or reclassify ADRs to a more restrictive classification. 10. Option 5 was the CAA’s preferred option; however the CAA acknowledged that consultation could identify circumstances that would dictate either the removal of specific routes (primarily on exceptionally low utilisation grounds), reductions to the vertical limits of particular routes, or reclassification to a classification more restrictive than Class E (primarily on high utilisation grounds). 11. Launched on 8 April 2013, the consultation was originally due to end on 12 July 2013, however this was extended to 26 July 2013 to allow stakeholders additional time to consider supplementary consultation material provided by the CAA. Comments from the consultation were examined in detail by CAA staff, which led the CAA to refine its proposals prior to notifying industry of its preferred way forward. Consultation Response Analysis 12. 37 organisations or individuals responded either directly or indirectly1,2,3 to the initial consultation. A breakdown of the nature of respondents is at Figure 1. As shown in Figure 2, 22% of responses were assessed as being supportive or broadly supportive of the CAA’s preferred option, while 76% opposed it. Response by stakeholder group is at Figure 3. Note that all opposition by individuals is attributable to members of the paragliding/hang gliding sector. 13. 75% of respondents advocated the replacement of all existing Class F airspace by Class E airways with Transponder Mandatory status or Class G on a case by case basis and/or by reducing the lateral and vertical limits particular routes for which there was a case for retention as a Class E airway as proposed (Figures 4 and 5). These responses were considered to demonstrate broad support for the principles of Option 4, whilst also validating the CAA’s recognition that consultation could identify cases for both within the context of Option 5. All respondents supported the CAA’s proposal to disestablish W2D, and none advocated the application of Class A to D airspace in lieu of Class F. 1 The General Aviation Alliance represented: British Balloon and Airship Club, British Hang Gliding and Paragliding Association, British Gliding Association, British Microlight Aircraft Association, British Parachute Association, Helicopter Club of Great Britain, Light Aircraft Association and PPL/IR. 2 The Defence Airspace Group represented: Director Army Aviation, Military Aviation Authority, Ministry of Defence (MOD) Defence Equipment and Support, and 3rd Air Force-Directorate of Flying. 3 NATS En Route Ltd represented NATS Services Ltd in their response Replacement of Class F Airspace in the UK FIRs - Consultation Report 17 April 2014 Page 2 of 16 Replacement of Class F Airspace in the UK FIRs - Consultation Report 1 2 NATMAC member organisations airspace user companies or 8 groups 18 airspace user individuals ATS providers airport operators 8 Figure 1: Initial consultation respondents by group 14% support 8% 3% broadly supportive 0% neutral broadly unsupportive 76% oppose Figure 2: Response to Option 5 14 support broadly supportive 12 neutral 10 broadly unsupportive 8 oppose 6 4 2 0 NATMAC airspace user airspace user ATS providers airport operators others member companies or individuals organisations groups Figure 3: Response to Option 5 by stakeholder group Replacement of Class F Airspace in the UK FIRs - Consultation Report 17 April 2014 Page 3 of 16 Replacement of Class F Airspace in the UK FIRs - Consultation Report 14. Opposition from individual airspace users centred upon the vertical limits of the resultant airspace were Option 5 implemented, and/or on the implications of Transponder Mandatory status upon paragliding and hang gliding activity. Half of individual airspace users who opposed Option 5 advocated limiting Transponder Mandatory status to FL100 and above. 22% 24% support 0% 3% broadly supportive neutral broadly unsupportive oppose 51% Figure 4: Support for the Principles of Option 4. 16 support broadly supportive 14 neutral 12 broadly unsupportive 10 oppose 8 6 4 2 0 NATMAC airspace user airspace user ATS providers airport operators others member companies or individuals organisations groups Figure 5: Support for the Principles of Option 4 by stakeholder group Key Issues and Themes 15. The CAA sought stakeholder comment on a number of key issues; in addition, consultation presented a number of additional themes. These are summarised as follows: a. Volume of Proposed Controlled Airspace. The most commonly expressed concern was related to the impacts of the volume of the proposed Class E+TMZ upon military and recreational General Aviation sectors. Whilst the need to replace Class F was acknowledged by almost all stakeholders, the impacts associated with the original proposals were unacceptable to many, the principle issues being the lack of suitable transponders and radios for gliders, paragliders and hang gliders.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “WATCH out FOR” the 200 Club Launch
    Vol: 1 Issue 1 July 2017 1Vol:1 July Issue “WATCH OUT FOR” The 200 Club Launch https://www.facebook.com/groups/643137552497216/ RAFA Global Branch Newsletter Volume 1 issue 1 July 2017 Page 2 Your Committee: From the Editor: Chairman: Mr Steve Mullis Having Joined the Book of the Month Vice Chair: RAFA “Global Mr David Routledge Group” and Hon Secretary: posting some of Mr Phil Boulton the RNZAFA Membership Secretary: monthly Mr Gerwyn Thomas newsletters that I Hon Treasurer: edit, I was asked Mrs Mazza Jesty by Steve Mullis if I Welfare Officer: Grp/Capt. (Rtd) would be Mrs Nick Loveday interested in Social Events Coordinator: starting a newsletter for this Group. Mr Steve Signorelli Well I was not only pleased that he Wings Appeal Organiser: thought it good enough to have on the Mr Graham Croft & Facebook page, but also pleased that I Mr Simon Chadwick can do something from far away Conference Delegate: “Shaky Old Christchurch” here in New Mr Steve Mullis Zealand, where we emigrated to in Newsletter Editor: 1978. Just to give you a little bit of my Mr Bryn Holland history: I joined the RAF in 1959 and 514 Squadron RAF (...and in Webmaster: served 5 years, Basic Training was at the morning...) (Volume 3) Mr Kris Mercer RAF Bridgnorth, Trade Training at RAF Shawbury as an “Operations by Barry Hope (Author) Clerk”. First posting was RAF Manston, and was followed by an Special points of Interest: overseas posting to RAF Nicosia The book contains details of all where I worked in the ATCC, returning casualties and losses suffered by Page Information Page to RAF Manston on finishing my 514 Squadron in WW2.
    [Show full text]
  • Dornoch Aerodrome
    Agenda 9. Item Report SCC/14/18 No HIGHLAND COUNCIL Committee: Sutherland County Date: 23 August 2018 Report Title: Dornoch Aerodrome Report By: Director of Development and Infrastructure 1. Purpose/Executive Summary 1.1 This is a situation update report for Dornoch Aerodrome. It provides information to Committee about the unique features of the airstrip and the users and other activities in the area. The report identifies a series of measures to improve the operations at the airstrip. 1.2 There has been dialogue with the RAF about a potential letter of agreement covering the interaction between the Council (Dornoch Aerodrome) and RAF Tain Range. The Committee is requested to delegate the Director of Development and Infrastructure to negotiate and conclude an agreement with the RAF. 1.3 The Committee is requested to approve the Rules for Users (Appendix 6) and the Schedule of Fees (Appendix 7). Recommendations 2. 2.1 Members are asked to: i. note the contents of this report; ii. note the proposed changes to signs at the airstrip, and efforts to be made to promote the boundary walking route(s); iii. delegate the Director of Development and Infrastructure to negotiate on behalf of the Council and conclude an agreement with the RAF iv. approve the Rules for Users (Appendix 6); and v. approve the Schedule of Fees (Appendix 7). 3. Airfield Features 3.1 Dornoch Aerodrome is one of three aerodromes that Highland Council owns or manages. The other two are Broadford (Skye) and Plockton (Wester Ross). The remit for airfields now sits with the Director of Development and Infrastructure, however it should be noted that local staff in Community Services and Business Support continue to support operational aspects of the airfields.
    [Show full text]
  • SANCTUARY Foreword
    THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE SUSTAINABILITY MAGAZINE Number 45 2016 THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE SUSTAINABILITY MAGAZINE OF DEFENCE SUSTAINABILITY THE MINISTRY SENNYBRIDGE Possibly the best waxcap-grassland in Europe NEW SERVICE FAMILY ACCOMMODATION Reveals henges and Number 45 Anglo-Saxon graves NORTHERN IRELAND Partnering and collaborating 2016 to deliver successful environmental management SANCTUARY Foreword Welcome by Julie Taylor SANCTUARY Director General Head Oce and Commissioning Services Editors I am delighted to have the opportunity Iain Perkins to provide the welcome to this year’s Marc Arbuckle (Design) Sanctuary Magazine which illustrates the continuing commitment and innovation Editorial Board of the Ministry of Defence (MOD) with its Jane Hallett (Chair) partners to deliver meaningful and Richard Brooks resilient outcomes for sustainability and conservation across the defence estate. Contact Defence Infrastructure The Strategic Defence and Security Organisation (DIO) Review 2015 reinforced our intent to Building 21, Westdown Camp ensure that we have the infrastructure Tilshead, Salisbury SP3 4RS and estate we need to support current [email protected] and future military capability. ‘A Better 01980 674 807 Defence Estate’ announced in November between Natural England and the MOD detailed our vision of how we intend to and I hope to build on these foundations Sanctuary is an annual achieve this via the Estate Optimisation with similar arrangements in the future publication about sustainable Programme. This programme will bring as well as realising opportunities under development in the Ministry of a number of changes and challenges to the Apprenticeship Scheme. Defence (MOD) and the the estate both in terms of investment sustainable management of the and divestment but the breadth of The Sanctuary awards winners and natural and built assets across expertise within MOD and our partner runner ups demonstrates the the Defence estate.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15 Environmental Statement Other Issues
    Gordonbush Extension Wind Farm Chapter 15 Environmental Statement Other Issues Chapter 15: Other Issues 15.1 Executive Summary ..................................... 15-1 15.2 Introduction................................................. 15-2 15.3 Telecommunications, Television / Radio .... 15-4 15.4 Aviation (Civil and Military) ......................... 15-6 15.5 Shadow Flicker ............................................ 15-8 15.6 Ice Throw ..................................................... 15-8 15.7 Air Quality .................................................... 15-9 15.8 Carbon Balance ......................................... 15-10 15.9 References ................................................. 15-11 Figures Figure 15.1 : Shadow Flicker Appendices Appendix 15.1: TV Impact Report Appendix 15.2: Carbon Calculator June 2015 Page 15-i Chapter 15 Gordonbush Extension Wind Farm Other Issues Environmental Statement THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK Page 15-ii June 2015 Gordonbush Extension Wind Farm Chapter 15 Environmental Statement Other Issues 15 Other Issues 15.1 Executive Summary 15.1.1 This Chapter considers potential effects of the Development on telecommunications, television / radio, aviation (civil and military), shadow flicker, ice throw, air quality and carbon balance. Telecommunications, Television / Radio 15.1.2 No disruption to telecommunications such as television and radio reception is anticipated as a result of the Development. Aviation (Civil and Military) 15.1.3 The Development is not within line of sight to the HIAL Inverness Airport or the RAF Lossiemouth Primary Surveillance Radars (PSRs) and no effects are anticipated. 15.1.4 Assessment showed that no radar line of sight exists between the Development and the Perwinnes and Allanshill PSRs or NATS air to ground communications facilities. This indicates that there will be no technical impacts on NATS operated aviation navigational facilities. As such, there is no anticipated effect on aviation navigational equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Service Inquiry Report Into the Death of a Soldier Participating in a Night Live Firing Sniper Cadre at RAF Tain Range Field
    44V Defence Safety Authority Service Inquiry Death of a Soldier Participating in a Night Live Firing Sniper Cadre at RAF Tain Range Field Firing Area 1 Nov 16 Defence Safety Authority Left Intentionally Blank OFFICIAL—SENSITIVE PART 1.1 — COVERING NOTE SI/01/15/TAIN 20 April 18 DG DSA SERVICE INQUIRY INTO THE FATAL ACCIDENT DURING THE 51 BRIGADE SNIPER OPERATORS' COURSE AT TAIN AIR WEAPONS RANGE ON 1 NOV 16 1. The Service Inquiry Panel assembled in MOD Main Building on the 12 Jan 17 by order of the DG DSA for the purpose of investigating the fatal accident during the 51 Brigade Sniper Operators' Course at Tain Air Weapons Range (Tain AWR) on 1 Nov 16 and to make recommendations in order to prevent reoccurrence. The Panel has concluded their inquiry and submits the report for the Convening Authority's consideration. 2. The following inquiry papers are enclosed: Part 1 The Report 1.1 Covering Note 1.2 Convening Order & TORs 1.3 Narrative of Events 1.4 Analysis and Findings 1.5 Recommendations 1.6 Convening Authority Comments Part 2 The Record of Proceedings 2.1 Diary of Events 2.2 List of Witnesses 2.3 List of Interviews 2.4 List of Attendees 2.5 List of Exhibits 2.6 Exhibits 2.7 List of Annexes - Nil 2.8 Annexes - Nil 2.9 List of Non-Germane 2.10 Master Schedule PRESIDENT Wing Commander Royal Air Force Member MEMBERS Captain Army Member Colour Sergeant Navy Member DSA/S1/01/17/TAIN OFFICIAL —SENSITIVE © Crown Copyright 2018 Intentionally Blank PART 1.2 Convening Order including Terms of Reference and Lexicon 1 2 - 1 DSA/SI/01/17/TAIN OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE © Crown Copyright 2018 Intentionally Blank Service Inquiry Convening Order 12 Jan 17 SI President Hd Defence AIB SI Members DSA Legad Copy to: PS/SofS DPSO/CDS MA/Comd JFC MA/Min(AF) MANC DS MA/CFA PS/Min(DP) NA/CNS MA/GOC 1 (UK) Div PS/Min(DVRP) MA/CGS Dir DDC PS/PUS PSO/CAS CO 3 SCOTS DSA DG/SI/01/17 - CONVENING ORDER FOR THE SERVICE INQUIRY INTO THE FATALITY THAT OCCURRED DURING A SNIPER CADRE AT RAF TAIN RANGES ON 1 NOV 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreword by Derek Twigg MP Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Defence and Minister for Veterans
    Foreword By Derek Twigg MP Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Defence and Minister for Veterans As our servicemen and women deploy around the world in support of military campaigns to deliver peace and stability, their professionalism and commitment is held in the highest regard. Fundamental to the success of their work, lies not only with ensuring that they are provided with the right equipment and support, but also, rigorous, effective and relevant training regimes. Low level flying is an essential and demanding skill that the Army, Navy and RAF aircrew must rehearse, develop and refine prior to a deployment in order to meet the requirements of their operational role. Both fixed-wing and helicopter crews require this training and regularly conduct low-level flights on current operations. This enables the aircraft, the aircrew and their passengers to operate effectively and, critically, as safely as possible. Acquiring and maintaining this skill requires constant practice and is crucial to ensure that the aircrew are fully prepared for the challenges they face, often in difficult and dangerous conditions. It is acknowledged that low flying training may cause disturbance for the public. Every effort though is made to minimise the effects on the general public by distributing this essential training across as wide an area of the UK as possible – minimum disturbance for the maximum amount of people. As in every walk of life, there are constant demands on limited resources (airspace) and the military constantly works with civilian organisations to ensure that the training areas within the UK continue to meet their requirements without losing sight of the needs and expectations of others.
    [Show full text]
  • Riders in the Sky 1944: the Liberator GR Mk.III and GR Mk.V In
    RIDERS IN THE SKY 1944 The Liberator GR Mk.III and GR Mk.V in RAF Coastal Command Service Pavel Türk Pavel Vančata ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF BOOK INCLUDED IN EDUARD – MODEL ACCESSORIES 1/72 SCALE LIMITED EDITION KIT No. 2121 “RIDERS IN THE SKY”. ORIGINAL LANGUAGE CZECH. ORIGIN OF THIS PDF FILE: WWW.EDUARD.COM WWW.EDUARD.CZ © 2018, Pavel Türk, Pavel Vančata © 2018, Eduard – Model Accessories All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means including but not limited to graphics, cyberspace, electronic or mechanical, or for any use as an informative stage and retrieval system, without written permission from the author and the publisher. Special thanks for help and provided photographs to: Allan G. Blue Mike Bailey Jock Manson David Smith Phil Butler Norman Franks Bob Livingstone SDASM NMUSAF NNAM Iveta Irvingová Bronislav Hrabec Blažena Husáková-Vellová Jaroslav Popelka Vlasta Suchý Zdeněk Hurt Jan Rail Milan Šindler Miloslav Pajer Jiří Rajlich Václav Kolesa Adéla Kándlová - Ladislav Sitenský’s photos © 2018, Pavel Türk, Pavel Vančata RIDERS IN THE SKY 1944 / The Liberator GR Mk.III and GR Mk.V in RAF Coastal Command Service Profiles: Karel Vorlíček Editor: Martin Ferkl Translation: John Bubak Graphic Design, Squadron Insignia and Typesetting: Jan Zdiarský Publisher: © 2018, Eduard – Model Accessories (Mírová 170, 435 21 Obrnice, The Czech Republic) www.eduard.cz First Edition Introduction Supply of Liberators to the United Kingdom At the beginning of 1940, Europe, notably types made by the company such as two the United Kingdom and France, realized large oval vertical tail surfaces (which that war with Germany was inevitable.
    [Show full text]
  • At the Vanguard: European Contributions to NATO's Future
    C O R P O R A T I O N ANIKA BINNENDIJK, GENE GERMANOVICH, BRUCE MCCLINTOCK, SARAH HEINTZ At the Vanguard European Contributions to NATO’s Future Combat Airpower For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RRA311-1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0586-9 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Courtesy photo/USAFE-AFAFRICA. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface Combat airpower constitutes an important line of effort in bolster- ing NATO’s deterrence and defense in a range of potential scenarios against a near-peer competitor.
    [Show full text]
  • RAFOC REMINISCENCES and RAMBLINGS - WEEK 36 – 11Th DECEMBER 2020 GREETINGS
    ROYAL AIR FORCE OFFICERS’ CLUB Johannesburg P.O. Box 69726 BRYANSTON 2021 [email protected] www.rafoc.org President: David MacKinnon-Little Vice Presidents: Basil Hersov, Colin Francis, Geoff Quick, David Lake Chairman: Bruce Harrison [email protected] Tel: 011 673 0291 Cell: 083 325 0025 Vice Chairman: Jon Adams [email protected] Tel: 011 678 7702 Cell: 082 450 0616 Hon. Secretary: Colin Ackroyd Tel: 012 942 1111 Cell: 082 800 5845 Hon. Treasurer: Jeff Earle Tel: 011 616 3189 Cell: 083 652 1002 Committee Members: Russell Swanborough Tel: 011 884 2611 Cell: 083 263 2740 Karl Jensen Tel: 011 234 0598 Cell: 082 331 4652 Jean-Michel Girard Cell: 083 659 1067 Geoff Fish Tel: 012 667 2759 Cell: 083 660 9697 Web Master: Hanke Fourie Tel: Cell: 082 553 0210 Bank Account: Nedbank - Melrose Arch Br: 19 66 05 Account 19 66 278 063 RAFOC REMINISCENCES AND RAMBLINGS - WEEK 36 – 11th DECEMBER 2020 GREETINGS: The week started off in tatters: Leaked matric exams: Cosas urged Malusi to deal with 'crooks' as it slams rewriting of paper... Ballito Rage Festival attendees to get tested for Covid-19 and self-isolate after some attendees and staff tested positive. ALL Rage events in SA for the next year now cancelled. Protesters this week at the SAPREF refinery in Durban want it closed... The ANC NEC meeting didn’t start as planned on Sunday as President Ramaphosa was still busy with the AU – NEC was expected to debate the contentious issue of the party's resolution that corruption accused leaders should step aside, as it stumbles on the road to dealing with corruption.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Low Flying in the United Kingdom
    Ministry of Defence Military Low Flying in the United Kingdom Ministry of Defence Military Low Flying in the United Kingdom Foreword By the Assistant Chief of the Air Staff ilitary aircraft have operated at low level within United Kingdom Airspace since the end of the Second World War. The nature of military operations has changed considerably in the last 65 Myears, from the static defensive position of the Cold War years, to highly mobile expeditionary warfare and counter-insurgency operations of today. The roles that our aircraft are required to conduct have also changed, but the need to be able to operate at low level by both day and night remains as important now as it has been in the past. Recent operations have shown that the ability to conduct tactical re-supply and movement of troops and equipment by both transport aircraft and helicopters in the low level environment remains vitally important to mission success. Equally, there remain situations where fast-jet aircraft are at their most effective in the low level environment. History has shown that future international crises are difficult to predict, and it is necessary to maintain a broad range of capabilities, including the ability to operate at low level, for future contingencies. The very high calibre of our military people and the courage that they display on a daily basis is critical to mission success, but that is not achieved without comprehensive and targeted training prior to operational deployment. While some training is conducted abroad, most training takes place in this Country. Acquiring the ability to operate in the low-level environment is part of the initial training that all aircrew undergo.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence Estate Development Plan
    ANNEX A TO DEDP 09 DATED 03 JUL 09 Estate Baseline - 2009 DE Core Future years SPEC 024 Size Serial Govt Regions TLB Core Site Retained Dispose Site Function Interdependency Postcode Constituency Regions Location from 2009 Code Hectares HMS GANNET Search & Rescue 1 Scotland North FLEET 2019-2030 Leased Site SAR(H) PFI GANN 21 KA9 2NR Central Ayrshire (Prestwick) (Helicopter) 2 Scotland North FLEET RM CONDOR Arbroath 2019-2030 Royal Marines RMCR 201 DD11 3SP Angus KENTIGERN HOUSE Army Personnel 3 Scotland North LAND Clyde 2019-2030 GLKH 2 G2 8EX Glasgow Central Glasgow Centre DREGHORN Edinburgh South 4 Scotland North LAND BARRACKS 2019-2030 Inf (Lt) Super Garrison DREG 61 EH13 9QW West Edinburgh 5 Scotland North LAND EDINBURGH CASTLE 2019-2030 Leased Site HQ 52 Bde CAST 5 EH1 2YT Edinburgh East FORT GEORGE Inverness, Nairn, 6 Scotland North LAND (Barrack Site only) 2013-2018 Inf (Lt) FTGR 39 IV2 7TE Badenoch & Inverness Strathspey GLENCORSE 7 Scotland North LAND 2019-2030 Inf (Lt) Super Garrison GLEN 38 EH26 0NP Midlothian BARRACKS Edinburgh HQ 2 DIV CRAIGIE 8 Scotland North LAND 2019-2030 HQ 2 Div Super Garrison CRGH 31 EH30 9TN Edinburgh West HALL Edinburgh HQ 51 SCOTTISH BDE 9 Scotland North LAND 2013-2018 HQ 51 Bde HILH 02 <1 FK17 7RR Stirling Stirling JSMTC SCOTLAND Adventurous Ross, Skye & 10 Scotland North LAND Ballahulish, Nr Fort 2019-2030 IVJS 09 <1 PH49 4JB Training Lochaber William Inverness, Nairn, KINGUSSIE ADV TRG Adventurous 11 Scotland North LAND 2019-2030 ITCK <1 PH21 1HP Badenoch & HUT Newtonmore Training Strathspey
    [Show full text]
  • Sanctuary Magazine, No.39, 2010
    THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE CONSERVATION MAGAZINE Number 39 • 2010 The Roman Villa on the Rifle Range Time Team discoveries at Langport Seeing the Wood for the Trees Forestry on the MOD Estate Hitting the target SSSI Condition update Conservation Group Editor Clare Backman Photography Competition Defence Estates Photographic Editor Iain Perkins Defence Estates Designed by Corporate Document Services (CDS) Editorial Board John Oliver (Chair) Jane Winfield Pippa Morrison Julie Cannell Tony Morran Rebekah Jones Editorial Contact Sanctuary Team Strategy & Policy Defence Estates Building 97A Land Warfare Centre Warminster Wiltshire BA12 0DJ Email: [email protected] Tel: 01985 222877 Cover image credit Winner of Conservation Group Photography Competition Broad-bodied chaser dragonfly © Bob Kennedy To receive an electronic copy please contact: [email protected] Old Gate at Royal Military Academy Sandhurst © Isobel Mackie Sanctuary is an annual online publication We have had an excellent response from Group. This was a very difficult action shot to about conservation of the natural and the MOD Conservation Groups vying for take, which also lent itself to a cover image. historic environment on the defence the chance for their photograph to appear Highly commended was the photograph estate. It illustrates how the Ministry on the front cover and we would like to of Old Gates at Royal Military Academy of Defence (MOD) is undertaking its thank everyone who entered. After much Sandhurst (RMAS), taken by Isobel Mackie, responsibility for stewardship of the estate deliberation the board felt that the broad- RMAS Conservation Group (which can in the UK and overseas through its policies bodied chaser dragonfly taken by Bob be seen above).
    [Show full text]