DOCSLIB.ORG

Presentation by Samruk Energy, Saltanat Shunayeva

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Investor presentation September 2011 Content • Samruk-Energy at a glance • Review of Kazakhstan electricity market • Operational overview and performance • Financial overview and performance • Strategy • Key risks overview 2 Samruk-Energy at a glance . Samruk-Energy was established in May 2007 through consolidation of power generating assets for the implementation of a coordinated public policy in energy sector. The shareholders of Samruk-Energy are: JSC «National Welfare Fund «Samruk-Kazyna» - 94,385% and JSC «KazTransGas» - 5,615%. Samruk-Energy – the company, which consists of the largest in Kazakhstan: hydro power plants: Shardara HPP, Bukhtarma HPP, Shulbinsk HPP, Ust-Kamenogorsk HPP combined heat and power plants: Ekibastuz GRES-2, Almaty power plants open-pit mine: Bogatyr Komir. Samruk-Energy financial and operational indicators as of January 1, 2011: Indicators million KZT tenge million US dollars* Assets 244 049,3 1 671,6 Equity 112 302,2 769,2 Share capital 76 715,1 525,4 Revenue 76 939,9 527,0 EBITDA 16 180,6 110,8 Net profit 11 081,6 75,9 Share of Samruk-Energy in total electricity generation in Kazakhstan, % 15,4 (excluding Irtysh Cascade HPP) Share of Samruk-Energy plants in the electricity market of Kazakhstan 27,7 by installed capacity, % (including Irtysh Cascade HPP) Share of Samruk-Energy plants in the electricity market of Kazakhstan 27,6 by producing capacity, % (including Irtysh Cascade HPP) Source: Samruk-Energy * ) Exchange rate 146 KZT tenge/US dollar 3 Samruk-Energy subsidiaries JSC «Ust- Kamenogorsk HPP» (89,99%) JSC «Aktobe JSC «Station CHP» (100%) Ekibastuz GRES-2» (50%) LLP «Bogatyr Komir» (50%) JSC «Shulbinsk HPP» (92,14%) JSC «Bukhtarma HPP» (90%) JSC «Balkhash CHP» (100%) JSC «Mangystau EDNC» (75%+1 share) JSC «Moinak HPP» (51%) JSC «Zhambyl GRES» (50%) JSC «Alatau Zharyk Kompaniyasy» (100%) JSC «Shardara HPP» (100%) JSC «Almaty power plants» (100%) LLP «AlmatyEnergo Sbyt» (100%) Operating facilities Facilities under construction 4 Review of Kazakhstan electricity market Kazakhstan’s 10 biggest power producers in 2010 Installed Producing Output, Share in electricity Rank Power stations Ownership capacity, capacity, % of million kWh generation, % MW installed 1 Aksu GRES ENRC 13 712 16,7 2 110 94,6 50/50 Samruk-Kazyna and 2 Ekibastuz GRES-1 4 000 58,6 Kazakhmys 11 703 14,2 50/50 Samruk-Energy and 3 Ekibastuz GRES-2 5 439 6,6 1 000 92,0 INTER RAO UES 4 Karaganda GRES-2 Kazakhmys 4 780 5,8 663 100,0 5 CHP of JSC «Aluminum of Kazakhstan» ENRC 2 451 3,0 350 97,1 6 CHP MAEK MAEK-Kazatomprom 2 445 3,0 625 72,0 SevKazEnergo 7 Petropavlovsk CHP-2 2 410 2,9 380 95,3 Petropavlovsk 8 Pavlodar CHP-3 Pavlodarenergo 2 391 2,9 440 95,5 9 Karaganda CHP-3 Karaganda-Energocentre 2 332 2,8 440 89,8 90/10 Samruk-Energy and 10 Bukhtarma HPP 2 272 2,8 675 98,5 individuals Others 32 362 39,3 Total 82 296 Source: Kazakhstan Electricity Grid Operating Company (KEGOC) There are three major power zones in Kazakhstan: 1) Western Zone, that unites Atyrau, Western-Kazakhstan and Mangystau oblasts: - these regions possess most of the country’s oil and gas projects; - most power in this region is imported from Russia. 2) Northern Zone, that unites Akmola, Aktobe, Eastern-Kazakhstan, Karaganda, Kostanai, Northern-Kazakhstan and Pavlodar oblasts: - this zone produced almost 80% of Kazakhstan’s total electricity; - this zone exports excess power to the Southern Zone and Russia; - with most of coal reserves concentrated in this zone, it results in the lowers costs for electricity in Kazakhstan. 3) Southern Zone, that unites Almaty, Zhambyl, Kyzylorda and Southern-Kazakhstan oblasts: - this zone accounts for 38% of the country’s population ; - this zone is characterized with electricity shortage and highest electricity prices; - power is imported from Central Asia countries. 5 100% Review of Kazakhstan electricity market Electricity generation and consumption in Kazakhstan 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Electricity generation, billion kWh 51,6 55,4 58,3 63,9 66,9 67,8 71,7 76,3 80,0 78,4 82,3 Electricity consumption, billion kWh 54,4 57,4 58,7 62,4 64,8 68,4 71,9 76,4 80,6 78,0 83,8 Import of electricity, billion kWh 2,8 3,7 2,4 3,5 5,2 4,6 4,0 3,4 2,8 1,8 3,0 Export of electricity, billion kWh 0,0 1,7 2,0 5,0 7,3 4,0 3,8 3,3 2,2 2,2 1,5 Share of demand satisfied from own 94,9 93,6 95,9 94,4 92,0 93,3 94,4 95,5 96,5 97,7 96,4 production, % Share of demand satisfied by imported 5,1 6,4 4,1 5,6 8,0 6,7 5,6 4,5 3,5 2,3 3,6 electricity, % Source: Kazakhstan Operator of Electricity Energy and Power Market Electricity consumption and electricity tariff in power Structure of the power produced in Kazakhstan by plants in 2009 station type in 2010 100% Gas turbine power plants Hydro power 6% plants 80% 10% 55% 61% 68% 60% 40% 19% 19% 9% 20% 14% 8% 9% Coal-fired 12% 11% 15% power plants 0% 84% South Africa Russia Kazakhstan 4,2 US 2,9 US 2,3 US cent/kWh cent/kWh cent/kWh Source: KEGOK Other Service industry Households Industry 6 Source: The Agency of Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan Cap rates for electricity 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Groups of power stations US US US US US US US KZT tenge KZT tenge KZT tenge KZT tenge KZT tenge KZT tenge KZT tenge cent cent cent cent cent cent cent Group 1 (LLP «Ekibastuz GRES-1», JSC «Station Ekibastuz 3,60 2,40 4,68 3,12 5,60 3,73 6,50 4,33 7,30 4,87 8,00 5,33 8,80 5,87 GRES-2», JSC «Eurasian Energy Corporation» (Aksu GRES)) Group 2 (JSC «Zhambyl GRES named after T.I.Baturov») 5,90 3,93 6,50 4,33 6,90 4,60 7,90 5,27 8,30 5,53 8,50 5,67 8,70 5,80 Group 3 (JSC «Astana-Energy» (CHP-1,2), LLP «Karagandy Zhylu» (Karaganda CHP-1,3), JSC «Pavlodarenergo» 4,30 2,87 4,94 3,29 5,40 3,60 5,90 3,93 6,40 4,27 6,90 4,60 7,50 5,00 (Pavlodar CHP-2,3), JSC «AES Ust-Kamenogorsk CHP», CHP-2 of JSC «Mittal Steel Temirtau») Group 4 (Karaganda GRES-2 of «Kazakhmys» corporation, JSC «Aluminium of Kazakhstan» (Pavlodar CHP-1), Balkhash 3,50 2,33 3,80 2,53 4,10 2,73 4,55 3,03 5,10 3,40 5,50 3,67 6,00 4,00 CHP of «Kazakhmys» corporation, Zhezkazgan CHP of «Kazakhmys» corporation) Group 5 (LLP «SevKazEnergo Petropavlovsk», JSC «Ridder CHP», CHP of JSC «The Sokolovsko-Sarbaisk iron- 3,60 2,40 4,10 2,73 4,80 3,20 5,45 3,63 6,25 4,17 7,15 4,77 8,05 5,37 ore mining and enrichment plant») Group 6 (LLP «AES Sogrinsk CHP», LLP «Bassel group 6,30 4,20 7,30 4,87 7,70 5,13 7,90 5,27 8,10 5,40 8,20 5,47 8,30 5,53 KKS» (Karaganda GRES-1), LLP «Jet-7» (Stepnogorsk CHP) Group 7 (JSC «3-Energooratyk» (Shymkent CHP-3), JSC «Atyrau CHP», JSC «Aktobe CHP», JSC 4,90 3,27 5,40 3,60 5,90 3,93 6,30 4,20 6,70 4,47 7,00 4,67 7,30 4,87 «TarazEnergoCenter», Public utility company «Kyzylorda- energocenter») Group 8 (Kentau CHP, JSC «Kazzinc» (Tekeli CHP), LLP 4,50 3,00 4,95 3,30 5,40 3,60 5,98 3,99 6,60 4,40 7,20 4,80 7,50 5,00 «Shakhtinsk CHP», LLP «Ekibastuz CHP») Group 9 (Arkalyk CHP, Public utility company «Kostanai 5,28 3,52 5,56 3,71 5,88 3,92 6,28 4,19 6,70 4,47 7,12 4,75 7,60 5,07 power energy company», JSC «Zhaiykteploenergo») Group 10 (JSC «Almaty power plants» (CHP-1, CHP-2, CHP- 5,74 3,83 6,74 4,49 7,10 4,73 7,40 4,93 7,80 5,20 8,20 5,47 8,60 5,73 3, Kapshagai HPP) Group 11 (LLP «MAEK-Kazatomprom») 7,23 4,82 7,23 4,82 7,23 4,82 7,23 4,82 7,23 4,82 7,23 4,82 7,83 5,22 Group 12 (LLP «Zhanazhol gas turbine power plant», CHP of 5,30 3,53 5,80 3,87 6,40 4,27 7,00 4,67 7,70 5,13 8,40 5,60 8,80 5,87 Aksu ferroalloy plant of JSC «ТNC Kazhrom» (Akturbo)) Group 13 (Bukhtarma HPP of JSC «Kazzinc», LLP «AES Ust-Kamenogorsk HPP», LLP «AES Shulbinsk HPP», JSC 2,79 1,86 3,00 2,00 3,30 2,20 3,63 2,42 3,90 2,60 4,30 2,87 4,50 3,00 «Shardara HPP») Source: Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Kazakhstan 7 Share of Samruk-Energy in electricity market of Kazakhstan Share of Samruk-Energy* plants in the electricity market of Kazakhstan Share of Samruk-Energy* plants in the electricity market of Kazakhstan by installed capacity in 2009-2010 by producing capacity in 2009-2010 MW % MW % 19440,5 MW 15291MW 20000 19127,9 MW 100,0 16000 14821 MW 100,0 16000 80,0 80,0 12000 12000 60,0 60,0 8000 8000 40,0 40,0 5379,1 5379,1 MW MW 26,5 % 4000 27,6 % 4000 28,1 20,0 3923 MW 4214,6 MW 20,0 % 27,7 % 0 0,0 0 0,0 2009 2010 2009 2010 Power plants of Samruk-Energy Power plants of Kazakhstan Unified Power System Samruk-Energy Power plants of Samruk-Energy Power plants of Kazakhstan Unified Power System Samruk-Energy *) Share of Samruk-Energy plants in the electricity market of Kazakhstan is shown including Irtysh Cascade HPP Share of Samruk-Energy companies in electricity generation in Kazakhstan billion kWh 90 % Company 2008 2009 2010 75 15,4% Shardara HPP 14,8% Shardara HPP 0,5 0,7 0,8 20,3% Zhambyl GRES Zhambyl GRES 5,3 1,7 0,6 60 20,5% Aktobe CHP 19,5% Aktobe CHP 0,8 0,8 0,8 20,9% Almaty power plants Almaty power plants 6,0 5,9 6,6 45 Ekibastuz GRES-2 Shulbinsk HPP Ekibastuz GRES-2 7,7 5,7 6,6 65,7% 64,1% Shulbinsk HPP 1,8 1,9 1,9 30 58,8% Ust-Kamenogorsk HPP Bukhtarma HPP Ust-Kamenogorsk HPP 2,0 1,7 1,6 15 Ekibastuz GRES-1 Bukhtarma HPP 3,3 2,8 2,8 Other plants in Kazakhstan Ekibastuz GRES-1 13,8 13,2 14,2 0 Other plants in Kazakhstan 58,8 65,6 64,1 2008 2009 2010 8 Source: Samruk-Energy, Ministry of industry and new technologies of the Republic of Kazakhstan Breakdown of Samruk-Energy subsidiaries in total electricity generation 2009, % 2010, % Shulbinsk HPP Shulbinsk HPP 8,9% 8,7% Ust-Kamenogorsk HPP Ekibastuz GRES-2 Ust-Kamenogorsk 8,1% 26,9% HPP Ekibastuz GRES-2 7,6% 30,5% Bukhtarma HPP Bukhtarma HPP 12,7%
Recommended publications
  • Ecosystem Service Assessment of the Ili Delta, Kazakhstan Niels Thevs

    Ecosystem Service Assessment of the Ili Delta, Kazakhstan Niels Thevs

    Ecosystem service assessment of the Ili Delta, Kazakhstan Niels Thevs, Volker Beckmann, Sabir Nurtazin, Ruslan Salmuzauli, Azim Baibaysov, Altyn Akimalieva, Elisabeth A. A. Baranoeski, Thea L. Schäpe, Helena Röttgers, Nikita Tychkov 1. Territorial and geographical location Ili Delta, Kazakhstan Almatinskaya Oblast (province), Bakanas Rayon (county) The Ili Delta is part of the Ramsar Site Ile River Delta and South Lake Balkhash Ramsar Site 2. Natural and geographic data Basic geographical data: location between 45° N and 46° N as well as 74° E and 75.5° E. Fig. 1: Map of the Ili-Balkhash Basin (Imentai et al., 2015). Natural areas: The Ramsar Site Ile River Delta and South Lake Balkhash Ramsar Site comprises wetlands and meadow vegetation (the modern delta), ancient river terraces that now harbour Saxaul and Tamarx shrub vegetation, and the southern coast line of the western part of Lake Balkhash. Most ecosystem services can be attributed to the wetlands and meadow vegetation. Therefore, this study focusses on the modern delta with its wetlands and meadows. During this study, a land cover map was created through classification of Rapid Eye Satellite images from the year 2014. The land cover classes relevant for this study were: water bodies in the delta, dense reed (total vegetation more than 70%), and open reed and shrub vegetation (vegetation cover of reed 20- 70% and vegetation cover of shrubs and trees more than 70%). The land cover class dense reed was further split into submerged dense reed and non-submerged dense reed by applying a threshold to the short wave infrared channel of a Landsat satellite image from 4 April 2015.
  • INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE Date: July 30, 2021 Reference Number: IC-2021-080

    INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE Date: July 30, 2021 Reference Number: IC-2021-080

    DocuSign Envelope ID: BB6EA17B-538D-4D65-97EA-6E8871B739CA INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE Date: July 30, 2021 Reference Number: IC-2021-080 Country: Republic of Kazakhstan Description of the Leader of the expert group for the development of the Scientific Background assignment: report and Feasibility Study for the creation of 5 new PAs1 and a program for monitoring the biodiversity of 5 pilot PAs2 Project name: UNDP-GEF Project "Conservation and Sustainable Management of Key Globally Important Ecosystems for Multiple Benefits", 00101043 Period of August 2021 - December 2022 (250 working days within 17 months) assignment/services: Contract Modality: Individual contractor (IC) Any request for clarification must be sent by standard electronic communication to the e-mail [email protected] and in e-mail subject please indicate Request_Ref.2021-080. 1. BACKGROUND The total forest area in Kazakhstan is about 12.6 million hectares, which makes it one of the richest in forest countries in Eurasia, despite the low level of forest cover, which is only 4.6%. Approximately 95% of the forests (wooded areas) in Kazakhstan are managed by 123 forestry administrations, which are controlled by regional governments (akimats). There are three main types of forest ecosystems in Kazakhstan: alpine mountain forests, tugai (southern coastal) forests and saxaul landscapes (desert and semi-desert shrubs). Since 2018, the GEF-UNDP project "Conservation and sustainable management of key globally significant ecosystems for obtaining various benefits" (hereinafter referred to as the project) has been implemented on the territory of the republic. The project strategy is to holistically address the conservation and sustainable use of forest ecosystems in Kazakhstan, through management approaches including both protected areas and sustainable use of associated HCVF landscapes (maps of the project areas are presented in Appendices 4, 5, 6 to the Terms of Reference).
  • Water Resources Lifeblood of the Region

    Water Resources Lifeblood of the Region

    Water Resources Lifeblood of the Region 68 Central Asia Atlas of Natural Resources ater has long been the fundamental helped the region flourish; on the other, water, concern of Central Asia’s air, land, and biodiversity have been degraded. peoples. Few parts of the region are naturally water endowed, In this chapter, major river basins, inland seas, Wand it is unevenly distributed geographically. lakes, and reservoirs of Central Asia are presented. This scarcity has caused people to adapt in both The substantial economic and ecological benefits positive and negative ways. Vast power projects they provide are described, along with the threats and irrigation schemes have diverted most of facing them—and consequently the threats the water flow, transforming terrain, ecology, facing the economies and ecology of the country and even climate. On the one hand, powerful themselves—as a result of human activities. electrical grids and rich agricultural areas have The Amu Darya River in Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan, with a canal (left) taking water to irrigate cotton fields.Upper right: Irrigation lifeline, Dostyk main canal in Makktaaral Rayon in South Kasakhstan Oblast, Kazakhstan. Lower right: The Charyn River in the Balkhash Lake basin, Kazakhstan. Water Resources 69 55°0'E 75°0'E 70 1:10 000 000 Central AsiaAtlas ofNaturalResources Major River Basins in Central Asia 200100 0 200 N Kilometers RUSSIAN FEDERATION 50°0'N Irty sh im 50°0'N Ish ASTANA N ura a b m Lake Zaisan E U r a KAZAKHSTAN l u s y r a S Lake Balkhash PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC Ili OF CHINA Chui Aral Sea National capital 1 International boundary S y r D a r Rivers and canals y a River basins Lake Caspian Sea BISHKEK Issyk-Kul Amu Darya UZBEKISTAN Balkhash-Alakol 40°0'N ryn KYRGYZ Na Ob-Irtysh TASHKENT REPUBLIC Syr Darya 40°0'N Ural 1 Chui-Talas AZERBAIJAN 2 Zarafshan TURKMENISTAN 2 Boundaries are not necessarily authoritative.
  • Energy Efficiency, Denmark Singapore Access to Energy, Estonia South Africa Demand Side Finland Thailand Management and France Much More

    Energy Efficiency, Denmark Singapore Access to Energy, Estonia South Africa Demand Side Finland Thailand Management and France Much More

    Kazakhstan Energy Profile INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The IEA examines IEA member IEA association the full spectrum countries: countries: of energy issues including oil, gas Australia Brazil and coal supply and Austria China demand, renewable Belgium India energy technologies, Canada Indonesia electricity markets, Czech Republic Morocco energy efficiency, Denmark Singapore access to energy, Estonia South Africa demand side Finland Thailand management and France much more. Through Germany its work, the IEA Greece advocates policies Hungary that will enhance Ireland the reliability, Italy affordability and Japan sustainability of Korea energy in its Luxembourg 30 member Mexico countries, Netherlands 8 association New Zealand countries and Norway beyond. Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States The European Commission also participates in the work of the IEA Please note that this publication is subject to specific restrictions that limit its use and distribution. The terms and conditions are available online at www.iea.org/t&c/ Source: IEA. All rights reserved. International Energy Agency Website: www.iea.org Kazakhstan Table of contents Country overview Table of contents Kazakhstan Energy Profile ...................................................................................................... 2 Country overview ....................................................................................................................... 2 Key energy data ........................................................................................................................
  • Central Asian Rivers Under Climate Change: Impacts Assessment in Eight Representative Catchments

    Central Asian Rivers Under Climate Change: Impacts Assessment in Eight Representative Catchments

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Didovets, Iulii et al. Article — Published Version Central Asian rivers under climate change: Impacts assessment in eight representative catchments Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies Provided in Cooperation with: Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), Halle (Saale) Suggested Citation: Didovets, Iulii et al. (2021) : Central Asian rivers under climate change: Impacts assessment in eight representative catchments, Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, ISSN 2214-5818, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Vol. 34, Iss. (Article No.:) 100779, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100779 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/229441 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur
  • Natural Recreation Potential of the West Kazakhstan Region of the Republic of Kazakhstan

    Natural Recreation Potential of the West Kazakhstan Region of the Republic of Kazakhstan

    GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites Year XIII, vol. 32, no. 4, 2020, p.1355-1361 ISSN 2065-1198, E-ISSN 2065-0817 DOI 10.30892/gtg.32424-580 NATURAL RECREATION POTENTIAL OF THE WEST KAZAKHSTAN REGION OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN Bibigul CHASHINA L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Satpayev Str., 2, 010008 Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan, e-mail: [email protected] Nurgul RAMAZANOVA L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Satpayev Str., 2, 010008 Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan, e-mail: [email protected] Emin ATASOY Bursa Uludag University, 6059, Gorukle, Bursa, Turkye, e-mail: [email protected] Zharas BERDENOV* L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Satpayev Str., 2, 010008 Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan, e-mail: [email protected] Dorina Camelia ILIEȘ University of Oradea, Faculty of Geography, Tourism and Sport, Department of Geography, Tourism and Territorial Planning, Oradea, Romania, e-mail: [email protected] Citation: Chashina, B., Ramazanova, N., Atasoy, E., Berdenov, Zh., & Ilieș, D.C. (2020). NATURAL RECREATION POTENTIAL OF THE WEST KAZAKHSTAN REGION OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 32(4), 1355–1361. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.32424-580 Abstract: This article is an attempt to assess the natural and recreational potential of the West Kazakhstan region. This technique consists of different stages: assessment of the territory concerning the recreational potential, according to the physical and geographi cal conditions; determination of administrative districts (units) within each of the recreational development zones; inventory of specially protected natural areas.The main criterion for the quantitative assessment was the presence of specially protected natural areas, their number and occupied area.
  • The Caspian Sea Encyclopedia

    The Caspian Sea Encyclopedia

    Encyclopedia of Seas The Caspian Sea Encyclopedia Bearbeitet von Igor S. Zonn, Aleksey N Kosarev, Michael H. Glantz, Andrey G. Kostianoy 1. Auflage 2010. Buch. xi, 525 S. Hardcover ISBN 978 3 642 11523 3 Format (B x L): 17,8 x 25,4 cm Gewicht: 967 g Weitere Fachgebiete > Geologie, Geographie, Klima, Umwelt > Anthropogeographie > Regionalgeographie Zu Inhaltsverzeichnis schnell und portofrei erhältlich bei Die Online-Fachbuchhandlung beck-shop.de ist spezialisiert auf Fachbücher, insbesondere Recht, Steuern und Wirtschaft. Im Sortiment finden Sie alle Medien (Bücher, Zeitschriften, CDs, eBooks, etc.) aller Verlage. Ergänzt wird das Programm durch Services wie Neuerscheinungsdienst oder Zusammenstellungen von Büchern zu Sonderpreisen. Der Shop führt mehr als 8 Millionen Produkte. B Babol – a city located 25 km from the Caspian Sea on the east–west road connecting the coastal provinces of Gilan and Mazandaran. Founded in the sixteenth century, it was once a heavy-duty river port. Since the early nineteenth century, it has been one of the major cities in the province. Ruins of some ancient buildings are found here. Food and cotton ginning factories are also located here. The population is over 283 thou as of 2006. Babol – a river flowing into the Caspian Sea near Babolsar. It originates in the Savadhuk Mountains and is one of the major rivers in Iran. Its watershed is 1,630 km2, its length is 78 km, and its width is about 50–60 m at its mouth down to 100 m upstream. Its average discharge is 16 m3/s. The river receives abundant water from snowmelt and rainfall.
  • Canyons of the Charyn River (South-East Kazakhstan): Geological History and Geotourism

    Canyons of the Charyn River (South-East Kazakhstan): Geological History and Geotourism

    GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites Year XIV, vol. 34, no. 1, 2021, p.102-111 ISSN 2065-1198, E-ISSN 2065-0817 DOI 10.30892/gtg.34114-625 CANYONS OF THE CHARYN RIVER (SOUTH-EAST KAZAKHSTAN): GEOLOGICAL HISTORY AND GEOTOURISM Saida NIGMATOVA Institute of Geological Sciences named after K.I. Satpaev, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan, e-mail: [email protected] Aizhan ZHAMANGARА L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Satpayev Str., 2, 010008 Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan, Institute of Botany and Phytointroduction, e-mail: [email protected] Bolat BAYSHASHOV Institute of Geological Sciences named after K.I. Satpaev, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan, e-mail: [email protected] Nurganym ABUBAKIROVA L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Satpayev Str., 2, 010008 Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan, e-mail: [email protected] Shahizada AKMAGAMBET L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Satpayev Str., 2, 010008 Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan, e-mail: [email protected] Zharas ВERDENOV* L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Satpayev Str., 2, 010008 Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan, e-mail: [email protected] Citation: Nigmatova, S., Zhamangara, A., Bayshashov, B., Abubakirova, N., Akmagambet S., & Berdenov, Zh. (2021). CANYONS OF THE CHARYN RIVER (SOUTH-EAST KAZAKHSTAN): GEOLOGICAL HISTORY AND GEOTOURISM. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 34(1), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.34114-625 Abstract: The Charyn River is located in South-East Kazakhstan, 195 km east of Almaty. The river valley cuts through Paleozoic rocks and loose sandy-clay deposits of the Cenozoic and forms amazingly beautiful canyons, the so-called "Valley of Castles".
  • Seismogenic Destruction of the Kamenka Medieval Fortress, Northern Issyk-Kul Region, Tien Shan (Kyrgyzstan)

    Seismogenic Destruction of the Kamenka Medieval Fortress, Northern Issyk-Kul Region, Tien Shan (Kyrgyzstan)

    Seismogenic destruction of the Kamenka medieval fortress, northern Issyk-Kul region, Tien Shan (Kyrgyzstan) A. M. Korjenkov1∗, J R. Arrowsmith2, C. Crosby2, E. Mamyrov1, L. A. Orlova3, I. E. Povolotskaya1, K. Tabaldiev4 1. Institute of Seismology NAS KR, Asanbay52/1, Bishkek 720060, Kyrgyzstan 2. Department of Geological Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-1404, USA 3. Laboratory of Geology and Paleoclimatology of Cenozoic, Institute of Geology SO RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia 4. Kyrgyz-Turkish University "Manas", Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan Abstract A paleoseismological study of the medieval Kamenka fortress in the northern part of the Issyk-Kul Lake depression, northern Tien Shan in Kyrgyzstan, revealed an oblique slip thrust fault scarp offsetting the fortification walls. This 700m long scarp is not related to the 1911 Kebin Earthquake (Ms 8.2) fault scarps which are widespread in the region, but as analysis of stratigraphy in a paleoseismic trench and archaeological evidence reveal, it can be assigned to a major 12th century AD earthquake which produced up to 4 m of oblique slip thrusting antithetic to that of the nearby dominant faults. The inferred surface rupturing earthquake apparently caused the fortress destruction and was likely the primary reason for its abandonment, not the Mongolian-Tatar invasions as previously thought. Key words: archaeoseismology, fault-scarp, fortress, castle, surface fault, decline, Mongol-Tatar invasion, Issyk-Kul Lake, Tien Shan, Kyrgyzstan Introduction The destruction and decline of central Asian medieval cities in the 12th-14th centuries is usually attributed to Mongolian-Tatar invasions of Chingizkhan and Tamerlane (e.g., Toynbee, 1946; Saeki, 1951; The Mongol Mission, 1955; Needham, 1959).
  • The Pragma Corporation TRADE and INVESTMENT PROJECT in CENTRAL ASIA

    The Pragma Corporation TRADE and INVESTMENT PROJECT in CENTRAL ASIA

    The Pragma Corporation TRADE AND INVESTMENT PROJECT IN CENTRAL ASIA FIFTH QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE PERIOD: September 1 through November 30, 2002 For the U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT Contract No. 116-C-00-01-00015-00 GENERAL INFORMATION COTR USAID/CAR Mark Urban PROJECT MANAGER Mohammad Fatoorechie CHIEF OF PARTY Paul Pieper Table of Contents I. SUMMARY OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENTS 3 II. ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES AND HOME OFFICE SUPPORT 5 III. CUSTOMS COMPONENT 6 “SAFE SEARCH SEMINAR – CLOSEDOWN REPORT” 17 IV. WTO COMPONENT 32 “MAS-Q REPORT – NOVEMBER 2002” BY ED NEMEROFF 42 V. REMOVAL OF INVESTMENT CONSTRAINTS COMPONENT 47 2 The Pragma Corporation USAID Trade and Investment Project In Central Asia Summary and Administrative Sections Quarterly Report September 1 through November 30, 2002 I. Summary of General Developments This quarterly report summarizes the activities of the USAID/Pragma Trade and Investment Project (TIP) during the past quarter. At the conclusion of the current quarter, TIP has completed 18 months of the two-year contract base period. The Pragma Corporation was authorized to begin work on TIP as of June 1, 2001. The contract between the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Pragma Corporation was finalized and signed in mid-July, 2001. The TIP was designed so that different components would be phased in gradually over a period of several months. The initial phase began on June 1, 2001. The Customs Component in Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan was phased in from the predecessor project beginning on July 1, 2001. The World Trade Organization (WTO) Component began to be phased in August in Kyrgyzstan.
  • Statistical Forecast of Seasonal Discharge in Central Asia Using

    Statistical Forecast of Seasonal Discharge in Central Asia Using

    Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2225–2254, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2225-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Statistical forecast of seasonal discharge in Central Asia using observational records: development of a generic linear modelling tool for operational water resource management Heiko Apel1, Zharkinay Abdykerimova2, Marina Agalhanova3, Azamat Baimaganbetov4, Nadejda Gavrilenko5, Lars Gerlitz1, Olga Kalashnikova6, Katy Unger-Shayesteh1, Sergiy Vorogushyn1, and Abror Gafurov1 1GFZ German Research Centre for Geoscience, Section 5.4 Hydrology, Potsdam, Germany 2Hydro-Meteorological Service of Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan 3Hydro-Meteorological Service of Turkmenistan, Ashgabat, Turkmenistan 4Hydro-Meteorological Service of Kazakhstan, Almaty, Kazakhstan 5Hydro-Meteorological Service of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan 6CAIAG Central Asian Institute for Applied Geoscience, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan Correspondence: Heiko Apel ([email protected]) Received: 15 June 2017 – Discussion started: 21 June 2017 Revised: 13 February 2018 – Accepted: 27 February 2018 – Published: 11 April 2018 Abstract. The semi-arid regions of Central Asia crucially els are derived based on these predictors as linear combi- depend on the water resources supplied by the mountain- nations of up to four predictors. A user-selectable number ous areas of the Tien Shan and Pamir and Altai moun- of the best models is extracted automatically by the devel- tains. During the summer months the snow-melt- and glacier- oped model fitting algorithm, which includes a test for ro- melt-dominated river discharge originating in the moun- bustness by a leave-one-out cross-validation. Based on the tains provides the main water resource available for agricul- cross-validation the predictive uncertainty was quantified for tural production, but also for storage in reservoirs for en- every prediction model.
  • Water Management in Kazakhstan

    Water Management in Kazakhstan

    Industry Report WATER MANAGEMENT IN KAZAKHSTAN OFFICIAL PROGRAM INDUSTRY REPORT WATER MANAGEMENT IN KAZAKHSTAN Date: April 2017 Language: English Number of pages: 27 Author: Mr. Marat Shibutov Other sectorial Reports: Are you interested in other Reports for other sectors and countries? Please find more Reports here: s-ge.com/reports DISCLAIMER The information in this report were gathered and researched from sources believed to be reliable and are written in good faith. Switzerland Global Enterprise and its network partners cannot be held liable for data, which might not be complete, accurate or up-to-date; nor for data which are from internet pages/sources on which Switzerland Global Enterprise or its network partners do not have any influence. The information in this report do not have a legal or juridical character, unless specifically noted. Contents 5.2. State and Government Programmes _________ 19 1. FOREWORD____________________________ 4 5.3. Recommended Technologies and Technology 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY __________________ 5 Suppliers ___________________________ 21 2.1. Current Situation with Water Resources _______ 5 6. PROSPECTS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN WATER 2.1.1. General Situation ______________________ 5 RESOURCES __________________________ 23 2.1.2. Stream Flow Situation ___________________ 5 2.1.2.1. Main Basins __________________________ 6 6.1. Prospects in the sphere of hydraulic engineering 2.1.2.2. Minor Basins _________________________ 6 structures __________________________ 23 6.2. Prospects in Agriculture _________________ 24 2.2. Myths and Real Water Situation ____________ 8 6.3. Prospects in the housing and utility sector _____ 24 2.2.1. Need for Canals________________________ 8 6.4. Prospects in Industry ___________________ 24 2.2.2.