DOCSLIB.ORG

1 a SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE on HOUSEWIVES and HOUSEWIFERY Figen UZAR ÖZDEMİR* Housewifery Is a State of Womanhood Which Is O

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 a SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE on HOUSEWIVES and HOUSEWIFERY Figen UZAR ÖZDEMİR* Housewifery Is a State of Womanhood Which Is O A SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE ON HOUSEWIVES AND HOUSEWIFERY Figen UZAR ÖZDEMİR* Housewifery is a state of womanhood which is often rendered invisible. A series of factors comes together and causes this situation. Among some of the most important factors are the underestimation of housewives’ contribution to the economy, definition of motherhood and household chores as women’s primary duties by the patriarchal culture and religions’ sanctifying motherhood and housewifery roles by making women the keepers of tradition and religion. Nevertheless, there are spheres where housewifery becomes visible through the consideration of housewives as a consumer group. Advertisement slogans such as “credit possibility for housewives”, “individual pension scheme for housewives” and “special price for housewives” might be familiar to all of us. In this article, I discuss housewifery as a sociological category; how this category has been discussed and conceptualized historically; the relationship between housewifery and household chores; the factors which render housewives invisible and the types of relationships housewifery embodies with examples from the Turkish context. While doing this, I try to examine housewifery through a relational analysis. When we say housewife, we mean a woman who does not work in a paid job in the labor market. This woman is also a married (or once married) woman because a woman is described as a housewife via her marriage relationship to a man. A housewife has usually kids. The fact that a woman who is not married and who does not work at a paid job outside home is called as a “housegirl” in the Turkish context seems to be supporting this argument. We can define housewifery as indicating the life and status of a woman who lives in the place called “home” and cares for household chores, her husband, kids and other members of the extended family who need care (if there is any). Housewifery as a sociological category has been analyzed from the point of women’s wife, mother and domestic laborer roles. In the literature, housewifery has been mostly discussed together with household chores and domestic labor and housewives have generally been examined in the context of psychological problems such as depression (Shehan, Burg & Rexroat 1986; Weissman vd. 1973). * Bülent Ecevit University, Department of Sociology 1 For example, Charlotte Perkins Gilman (1903), one of the pioneers of the first wave feminist movement in the USA, analyzed women’s relationship with household chores. According to Gilman, a woman who is responsible for the household chores and works for the reproduction of the family, performing the motherhood role in the house, is not reproductive since she does not contribute financially to the household economy. On the contrary, she is an economically dependent individual. According to her, only if household chores and care work are reorganized in terms of the market, then the labor of housewives can be named as productive labor. Again Gilman assumes “a hypothetical house-husband” and states that if domestic work and care work were performed by this house-husband, this work would be taken more seriously. She argues that since it is women who engage in domestic work, domestic labor is not seen as productive labor. As Özkaplan (2009) also stated household chores and care work which are performed usually by women in the household contain emotional motivations. We do housework for the ones we love most of the time; and the ones we look after are- again most of the time- people whom we love and value. In this sense, we not only use physical but also emotional labor. Of course, care for the elderly, the sick and the children and housework can get done by day laborers or other paid employees. This work generally performed by women from lower class strata leads to an emotional and exploitative relationship between employer and employee women (Kalaycıoğlu & Rittersberger-Tılıç 2001). At this point, I have to underline the fact that social class is a significant factor which determines relations between women. I think that the imagined kinship relation between the “generous elder sister” and the “loyal lady” which Kalaycıoğlu ve Rittersberger-Tılıç (2001) picture, usually appears when class differences between the two women are huge and when the employer woman is a wage laborer outside home. I also think that when the employer woman, who is not that much different from the day laborer woman in terms of class, does not work in a paid job, she claims her house and the housework; and she would not hire a day laborer if she is not obliged to do so. I would like to exemplify this situation via my observations of my mother who hires a day laborer because of her physical problems. My mother, for example, never completely leaves housework to the day laborer woman whom my mother calls when there would be a thorough cleaning in the house. My mother either cleans the house with her or helps her. She leads the day laborer and achieves that the cleaning is done the way she wants it to be done. This can be interpreted both as a way a woman dominates another woman and as a way the employer woman reminds the ones near her and herself that she is the “woman” in charge of that house. 2 I would like to mention a point Özkaplan (2009) highlighted: the women who do not perform housework and care work might think of themselves as not “good mothers/wives/housewives” and feel guilty. Perhaps this feeling has also an effect on why housewives like my mother do housework together with the day laborer. In fact, the aspiration to be a “good woman” which functions together with the feeling of guilt is one of the mechanisms underlying the invisibility and exploitation of housewives. I will discuss other mechanisms in the following lines. However, before that I will emphasize the invisibility of housewifery, housework and women’s domestic labor. Housework and care work- which are performed by unpaid labor of housewives who are considered as consumers but not as productive individuals in many societies-are services which cannot be afforded by the wage of lower and middle class employees if they were to be bought from the market. Hence, the load of repetitive, boring and physically heavy work which we call housework drew the interest of Marxist feminists. The increase in the number of women participating in the labor market especially in Europe after World War II led to a change in the condition of housewives but it did not lead to an equal division of labor in the domain of housework. We talk about women who work both outside home and at home as housewives. Similarly, when we look at Turkey, we see definitions of “working housewife” and “not working housewife”. What is more, motherhood and wifedom continue to be the primary roles for women although women work in a paid job (Beaumont 2016). Upon the fact that women are exploited both by the capitalist system as they work in a paid employment and by the patriarchal system as they continue to perform domestic work, the notion of “double burden” was developed (e.g. Hartmann 1979). The situation is the same for women who live in Turkey. Women who work in paid employment still perform all the domestic work as a result of the unequal division of labor at home. On the other hand, 1950s Europe also brought some opportunities for the working housewives. One of these opportunities is the increasing significance of housewives in the political sphere. For example, Beaumont (2016) in her study demonstrates that some housewife associations in the UK stated opinions on various issues such as house design, consumer standards or clothes design. Domestic labor perpetuates the invisibility of housewives as it is performed in the house, as it is seen as the sacred duty of women and as it is unpaid labor (cf. Oakley 1974; Glazer-Malbin 1976). When compared with the status of a woman who works outside home, a housewife’s status is seen as lower. Moreover, the status of a housewife is determined via the status- especially the occupational status- of her husband (Burzotta Nilson 1978). 3 The question of why a considerable number of women continue to be housewives despite many negative issues about housewifery might be asked. There can be answers to this question such as not being able to find a position in the labor market, forced or early marriage, and an oppressive family. These answers stem from structural reasons. There can also be individual reasons such as a woman’s undertaking of housewife role as a result of her own choice. For example, a mother who wants to raise her child may reject participating in the labor market and choose to become a housewife. Moreover, piety can be a reason for some women’s choice to be a housewife. For example, Sherkat (2000) in her study of fundamentalist Christian women found out that these women chose to be housewives at the beginning of their marriages and after their children were grown up, they entered the labor market. Whatever the reasons are, an analysis of housewifery as limiting women is a one-dimensional analysis because in some cases and for some women, being a housewife can be liberating. Home and housework might be the only fields on which some women have control. Another crucial point is that housewives are not to be seen as subordinated and passive subjects who do not have a say on matters within the family. As Kandiyoti (1988) states women are active individuals who engage in “patriarchal bargains” in order to open space for themselves.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Providing Unpaid Household and Care Work in the United States: Uncovering Inequality
    o IWPR #C487 January 2020 Providing Unpaid Household and Care Work in the United States: Uncovering Inequality By Cynthia Hess, Ph.D., Tanima Ahmed, M.Phil, and Jeff Hayes, Ph.D. In the United States, women spend considerably more time than men over their lifetime doing unpaid household and care work. The unequal distribution of this work—work that is essential for families and societies to thrive—not only limits women’s career choices and economic empowerment, but also affects their overall health and well-being. In recent years, the gender gap in unpaid household and care work in the United States has narrowed as more women have entered the labor market and men have taken on more of this work, yet it is unlikely that a significant further shift can occur without public policies that better support families with unpaid care responsibilities (Samman, Presler-Marshall, and Jones 2016). Increasing societal investments in care, and strengthening supports for working adults that allow them adequate time for providing unpaid care for their loved ones, would affirm the value of unpaid household and care work and contribute to the well-being of households, communities, and societies. These shifts are critical now, especially as the need for care for older adults in the United States is growing rapidly (Mather, Jacobsen, and Pollard 2015). Many studies have examined the gender gap in unpaid household and care work and its causes, yet few consider how women’s experiences with this work might differ across demographic groups and how the size of the gender gap in household and unpaid care work might change when the full range of household and care work activities, including elder care and “secondary” as well as “primary” child care, is considered.1 This briefing paper draws on relevant literature 1 In primary child care, the caregiver engages in an activity with the child.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender at the Crossroads of Home, Family, and Business from the Early Modern Era to the Present
    INTRODUCTION WHAT IS WORK? Gender at the Crossroads of Home, Family, and Business from the Early Modern Era to the Present Raffaella Sarti, Anna Bellavitis, and Manuela Martini 1. What is work? A fresh perspective from the (alleged) margins What is work? The question chosen as a title for this volume is an ambi- tious one. We are obviously aware that a huge body of literature on work exists, and we certainly do not pretend we can give a defi nite answer to the question,1 which may not even be possible.2 Instead, we will use this question as a tool to interrogate history, the social sciences, and also pol- itics. Such a question prompts us in fact to adopt a critical and diversifi ed view of work and, consequently, of economic and social policies, too. On the other hand, establishing the boundaries, implications, and stakes of a new characterization of work is a crucial issue in the contemporary de- bate, and is obviously also motivated by the ongoing dramatic economic, technological, organizational, social, and cultural changes affecting the world of work. Let us start with a telling example. “Italy is a Democratic Republic, founded on work,” article 1 of the Italian Constitution, written after the Second World War and enforced in 1948, authoritatively states3: this implied and still implies a kind of overlap between enjoying citizenship and working. When the Italian Constitution was enforced, according to the Italian population censuses as many as three-quarters of adult Italian women were not working or, more precisely, were economically “inac- tive.” What did they do? About 60 percent of them were housewives: 2 Raffaella Sarti, Anna Bellavitis, and Manuela Martini they were therefore likely to actually work very hard.
    [Show full text]
  • The Statistical Evidence on Care and Non-Care Work Across Six Countries
    The Statistical Evidence on Care and Non-Care Work across Six Countries Debbie Budlender Gender and Development United Nations Programme Paper Number 4 Research Institute December 2008 for Social Development This United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) Programme Paper has been produced with the support of the International Development Research Centre (IDRC, Canada) and the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC). UNRISD also thanks the governments of Denmark, Finland, Mexico, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom for their core funding. Copyright © UNRISD. Short extracts from this publication may be reproduced unaltered without authorization on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to UNRISD, Palais des Nations, 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland. UNRISD welcomes such applications. The designations employed in UNRISD publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNRISD con- cerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for opinions expressed rests solely with the author(s), and publication does not constitute endorse- ment by UNRISD. ISSN 1994-8026 Contents Acronyms iii Summary/Résumé/Resumen iv Summary iv Résumé v Resumen viii Introduction 1 Key Concepts 3 Background to
    [Show full text]
  • Organizing Home Care: Low Waged Workers in the Nation’S Health and Welfare
    Draft Paper Not for Citation or Quotation with Authors’ Permission 4/24/2007 Organizing Home Care: Low Waged Workers in the Nation’s Health and Welfare Eileen Boris, University of California, Santa Barbara Jennifer Klein, Yale University University of Chicago Center for Health Administration Studies Davis Lectureship Series May 2, 2007 Note: This paper derives from a longer study, tentatively called, Caring for America: How Home Health Workers Became the New Face of Labor, under contract from Oxford University Press. Last month, the Supreme Court considered whether the Department of Labor (DOL) in 1975 overstepped its rule making authority when exempting “elder companions”—including those employed by a third party, like a for-profit agency—from the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). During oral testimony, Justice Stephen Breyer worried whether “millions of people” would be able to afford home care if they had to abide by the nation’s wage and hour law. “[A]ll over the country,” he declared, “it’s the family, the children, the grandchildren, an aunt, an uncle, maybe a good friend, maybe they’re not even related, who is paying for a companion for an old, sick person so they don’t have to be brought to an institution.”1 Such a formulation expressed the anxieties of a generation faced with a crisis in the availability, affordability, and quality of long term direct care. In foregrounding the concerns of receivers of domestic and personal services, however, Justice Breyer erased the very presence of the providers, low-waged workers— predominantly women of color and immigrants—whose entitlement to minimum wage and overtime now rests in the Court’s hands.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Home Care Workers: Key Facts U.S
    U.S. HOME CARE WORKERS: KEY FACTS U.S. HOME CARE WORKERS More than 2 million home care workers across the U.S. provide personal assistance and health care support to older adults and people with disabilities in home and community-based settings.1 The home care workforce—primarily comprised of women and people of color—has doubled in size over the past 10 years as the delivery of long-term services and supports has increasingly shifted from institutional settings, such as nursing homes, to private homes and communities. In coming years, the rapidly growing population of older adults will drive demand for home care workers even higher. By 2050, the population of people over the age of 65 will nearly double, from 47.8 million to 88 million. Recruiting adequate numbers of home care workers to fill these jobs is becoming increasingly difficult, as evidenced by continual reports of workforce shortages.2 One reason for the shortages is the poor quality of home care jobs: wages are low and access to employer-provided benefits is rare. With a median hourly wage of $10.11 and work that is often part time or part year, home care workers earn on average $13,300 annually. As a result, one in four home care workers lives below the federal poverty line (FPL) and over half rely on some form of public assistance. HOME CARE WORKERS BY HOME CARE WORKERS HOME CARE WORKERS BYGENDER, GENDER, 2014 2014 BYAGE, AGE, 2014 2014 23% 19% 20% 20% 10% 8% 16-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ ▪ Female 89% ▪ Male 11% Chart Source: PHI analysis of the American Community Survey, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Women on the Move Migration, Care Work and Health Policy Brief
    Women on the Move Migration, care work and health Policy Brief Introduction Ageing in late industrial and middle-income economies, combined with rising demographic dependency ratios and female labour force participation, have led to emerging care deficits in many contexts in developed and developing countries. Around the world, more women are entering the labour force, taking them away from traditional unpaid caring roles in the home. Increasingly, immigrant women are being drawn into receiving country economies to care, often in informal settings, and frequently engaged by private households, without full access to social protection and labour rights. As the leading normative agency on health, the World Health Organization (WHO) calls attention to this paradox: that migrant women care workers buttress health systems in countries where there are shortfalls in health-care provision, while their own rights to health and well-being can be eroded and their health-care needs unfulfilled. These migrant women care workers act as a cushion for states lacking adequate public provision for long-term care, child care and care for the sick. Women on the Move The critical role of care work and care workers for health systems This Policy Brief focuses on women migrant care workers providing home-based personal care. Women migrant care workers play an increasingly prominent role in securing the health status of others and contributing to health systems. Yet relatively little is known about their own health status , their lives as migrant care workers, and their important contributions to health systems. This is particularly significant as a global paradox is emerging in which care workers, who are overwhelmingly female and many of whom are migrants, make a very large contribution to global public health, but are exposed to many health risks themselves while enjoying few labour market and health protections.
    [Show full text]
  • DESCRIPTION and ANALYSIS of HOMEMAKER TRAINING PROGRAMS in BRITISH COLUMBIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES EILEEN BRIGID RYAN B.Sc.N., Unive
    DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS OF HOMEMAKER TRAINING PROGRAMS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES by EILEEN BRIGID RYAN B.Sc.N., University of Alberta, 1972 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF EDUCATION in ADULT EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE, ADULT AND HIGHER EDUCATION THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Vfe accept this thesis as conforming to the required standards THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA April 1983 © EILEEN BRIGID RYAN In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Adult Education, Department of Administrative, Adult and Higher tducation, Ihe haculty of Graduate Studies The University of British Columbia 1956 Main Mall Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Y3 Date 11 ABSTRACT The purpose of this survey was to compare and contrast homemaker training programs in fifteen community colleges in British Columbia. Program aspects examined were the types of homemaker programs offered, sequences of the classroom, laboratory and field experiences, occupational competencies and objectives, prerequisites for entry of student homemakers and instructors' perceptions of a trained homemaker.. The data were collected between January 29, 1982 and February 22, 1982. The analysis of the data showed that of the thirteen colleges conducting homemaker programs, eleven offered full-time pre-employment day programs, seven offered part-time upgrading evening programs, with one of these colleges offering a combined pre-employment program, and six colleges offered full-time and part-time upgrading day programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Family-Friendly Policies for Workers in the Informal Economy
    FAMILY-FRIENDLY POLICIES FOR WORKERS IN THE INFORMAL ECONOMY Protecting and ensuring social protection and care systems for all children and families in the context of COVID-19 and beyond Family-friendly policies for workers in the informal economy 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The publication was jointly developed by Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing (WIEGO), United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and the International Labour Organization (ILO). The policy brief builds on UNICEF’s call to action for governments and businesses to redesign the workplaces of the future and enable parents and caregivers to give their children the best start in life, while boosting productivity and women’s economic empowerment. Find out more in "Redesigning the workplace to be family-friendly: What governments and businesses can do." In addition, this resource builds on the ILO’s call to promote investment in the care economy as part of the transformative agenda for gender equality of the "ILO Centenary Declaration for the Future of Work." It also expands upon the ILO and WIEGO policy brief series: "Childcare for workers in the informal economy," which explores how universal, publicly funded and quality childcare services, with decent care jobs and as part of social protection systems, can improve the lives and economic security of women workers in the informal economy, support their transition to the formal economy and promote gender quality at work. This policy brief was developed and written by Rachel Moussié from WIEGO, Ruth Graham Goulder, Shreyasi Jha, Christopher Kip, Grainne Moloney, Leigh Pasqual, Chemba Raghavan, Sarah Rossmann, Erica Wong from UNICEF, Laura Addati, Christina Behrendt, Umberto Cattaneo, Ian Orton and Emanuela Pozzan from the ILO.
    [Show full text]
  • How Care Work Employment Shapes Earnings in a Cross-National Perspective
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Budig, Michelle J.; Misra, Joya Working Paper How care work employment shapes earnings in a cross-national perspective LIS Working Paper Series, No. 499 Provided in Cooperation with: Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) Suggested Citation: Budig, Michelle J.; Misra, Joya (2008) : How care work employment shapes earnings in a cross-national perspective, LIS Working Paper Series, No. 499, Luxembourg Income Study (LIS), Luxembourg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/95457 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series Working Paper No. 499 How Care Work Employment Shapes Earnings in a Cross-National Perspective Michelle J.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5. Addressing the Gender Dimension of Informality │ 131
    CHAPTER 5. ADDRESSING THE GENDER DIMENSION OF INFORMALITY │ 131 Chapter 5. Addressing the gender dimension of informality Globally, men are more exposed to informality than women, but the share of women in informal employment exceeds that of men in a majority of countries (Chapter 1). Across countries, however, risks and vulnerabilities associated with the informal economy (Chapter 3) disproportionately affect women. This chapter provides updated evidence on gender disparities in key informal employment outcomes, such as employment status and wage levels. It then examines the role of gender-based constraints in employment outcomes and access to social protection. Last, it reviews gender-sensitive approaches that have been instrumental in empowering women in the informal economy in a number of countries, with a view to identify priority areas for policy makers. It is evident that the vulnerability challenge in the informal economy needs to be addressed through a gender lens. In particular, gender-sensitive risk management instruments are critically needed to ensure that current attempts to extend social protection to informal economy workers do not leave women behind. TACKLING VULNERABILITY IN THE INFORMAL ECONOMY © OECD/ILO 2019 132 │ CHAPTER 5. ADDRESSING THE GENDER DIMENSION OF INFORMALITY Informality exposes men and women differently Informality can be quite different for men and women, for many reasons. The incidence of informal employment by gender varies across countries, reflecting existing gender gaps in employment rates. Over the past 27 years, the gender employment gap has shrunk by less than 2 percentage points, it remains large and continues to widen in emerging countries, where it stands at 30.0 percentage points in 2018 (ILO, 2018[1]; ILO, 2019[2]).
    [Show full text]
  • Fatherhood for Stay-At-Home Fathers
    CATHERINE RICHARDS SOLOMON*, PHD “I Feel Like a Rock Star”: Fatherhood for Stay-at-Home Fathers Since the 1970s, fathers have experienced a new set of expectations for their role. Fathers are now expected to be more involved with the hands-on daily caregiving of their children. Perhaps because of these changing expectations, more men are choosing to be stay-at-home fathers than in previous generations. Very little so- ciological research exists about stay-at-home fathers’ ideas about fatherhood in the U.S. In particular, how do such men conceive of their status as stay-at-home fathers and of fatherhood? I explore these questions through in-depth interviews with men from locations across the United States. My study shows that stay-at- home fathers enact fatherhood in ways that may be starting to transform tradi- tional and new ideals of fatherhood. Keywords: Stay-at-home fathers, involved fathering, nontraditional families Since industrialization, breadwinning has comprised many fathers’ contributions to fam- ily work, with hands-on involvement solely the domain of mothers (Lamb, 2000). How- ever, the standards for fathers have evolved to expect more engagement with the day-to-day work of caring for children (Daly, 1996; Risman, 1998). Since these changes in the later part of the 20th century, more men are staying home to care for their children. The number of stay-at-home fathers increased in the United States from 105,000 in 2002 (Fields, 2003) to 189,000 in 2012 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2013a). Latshaw (2011) argued that these figures under-represent the number of stay-at-home fathers by close to a million because the Cen- sus Bureau does not count men who report other reasons for being out of the labor force or * Quinnipiac University.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Mobility, COVID-19, and Policy Responses: the Rights and Claims-Making of Migrant Domestic Workers
    Feminist Economics ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rfec20 Human Mobility, COVID-19, and Policy Responses: The rights and Claims-Making of Migrant Domestic workers Smriti Rao, Sarah Gammage, Julia Arnold & Elizabeth Anderson To cite this article: Smriti Rao, Sarah Gammage, Julia Arnold & Elizabeth Anderson (2021): Human Mobility, COVID-19, and Policy Responses: The rights and Claims-Making of Migrant Domestic workers, Feminist Economics, DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2020.1849763 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2020.1849763 Published online: 01 Mar 2021. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 97 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rfec20 Feminist Economics, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2020.1849763 HUMAN MOBILITY, COVID-19, AND POLICY RESPONSES:THE RIGHTS AND CLAIMS-MAKING OF MIGRANT DOMESTIC WORKERS Smriti Rao, Sarah Gammage, Julia Arnold, and Elizabeth Anderson ABSTRACT This article aims to explore policy responses to the early phase of the COVID-19 crisis, with a particular focus on disparate outcomes for international migrant domestic workers (MDWs). Through an analysis of interviews conducted with health and humanitarian organizations and experts in key migration corridors, it surfaces the central role that MDWs play in social provisioning and in mediating care responsibilities between the state and the family, particularly during lockdown and shelter-in place orders, and calls attention to the essential but excluded nature of migrant labor. The study investigates how states’ responses to COVID-19 intersected with existing institutions of social provisioning and immigration laws, and with claims-making by MDWs to shape the impact of this crisis upon the well-being of these workers.
    [Show full text]