DOCSLIB.ORG

Uganda: Floods Emergency Appeal N° MDRUG006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Uganda: Floods Emergency Appeal N° MDRUG006 Final report Uganda: Floods Emergency appeal n° MDRUG006 GLIDE n° FL-2007-000138-UGA 14 January 2010 Period covered by this Final Report: September 2007 to July 2008 Appeal target (current): CHF 11,413,603 (USD 9,511,366 or EUR 6,942,581); Final Appeal coverage: 69%; <Click here to go directly to the final financial report or here to view the contact details> Appeal history: · This Emergency Appeal was initially launched on a preliminary basis on 20 September 2007 for CHF 8,928,075 for 6 months to assist 100,000 beneficiaries. Demonstration model of shelter in Sororti Branch, in the · A total of five operations updates were background the URCS Branch office fitted with sat IT issued. communication provided by FACT. · A Revised Emergency Appeal for CHF 11,413,603 was issued on 18 December 2007 to assist 125,000 beneficiaries for 10 months. The total income for this appeal was CHF 7,863,044. · CHF 174,197 (USD 144,802 or EUR 105,959) was initially allocated from the Federation’s Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF), on 3 September 2007, to support this operation. Summary: This operation was implemented over 10 months starting September 2007 and completed by July 2008. During this period the URCS constructed latrines in primary schools in Amuria and Katakwi Districts. This was aimed at reducing incidences of waterborne and vector transmitted diseases due to lack of proper sanitation facilities. Family latrines were also constructed in Acowa, Asamuk and Kapelebyong parishes in Amuria district. Bathing shelters were also constructed for households in Usuk sub-county in Katakwi district. Boreholes in Amuria District were rehabilitated to reduce incidences of waterborne diseases due to lack of access to clean water and contamination of water sources. The URCS volunteers were trained in effective water source management and Participatory Hygiene and Sanitation Transformation (PHAST) in order to ensure proper maintenance of water sources and promote hygiene. Water user committees were established to sensitize and support water-users based on the participatory hygiene and transformation approach in the respective communities. Radio spots and talk shows awareness sessions were also conducted in Amuria and Katakwi Districts to promote sanitation and 1 hygiene improvement at both the community and household level. Bars of soaps were distributed to the floods affected households in Amuria and Katakwi Districts in order to support hygiene promotion. Borehole pump repair kits were distributed to sub-counties in Amuria (Kapelebyong, Acowa) and Katakwi (Toroma, Kapujan) districts and latrine digging kits distributed to floods affected households in Amuria and Katakwi. Contaminated water sources were also disinfected with chlorine. As a result of the funding received, activities had to be adjusted and implemented according to funds available. Although the time frame was short, most of the activities planned for were implemented. The flood response and subsequent recovery operation was a relatively large scale operation compared to previous relief work carried out by the Uganda Red Cross Society. However, the assistance of a FACT team and continuous support from the Federation and Partners ensured a well designed and effective response and recovery. The close working relationship with the communities via the volunteers made sure genuine needs were met. The ability to adapt the shelter component to provide more disaster resistant option for housing and the comprehensive food security recovery components resulted in a programme which significantly built community resilience to future disasters as well as providing emergency life saving relief. This operation was conducted in collaboration with the Ugandan Government, and the following Movement partners: the Austrian Red Cross/Government, Danish Red Cross, Australian Red Cross, Canadian Red Cross/Government, Finnish Red Cross/Government, Icelandic Red Cross/Government, Irish Red Cross/Government, Japanese Red Cross, Korea Republic Red Cross, Monaco Red Cross, New Zealand Red Cross/Government, Norwegian Red Cross/Government, Swedish Red Cross,United Arab Emirates Red Crescent and Swiss Government. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), United Nations Agencies (UN-OCHA, United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), European Commission Humanitarian Aid (ECHO) and World Food Programme (WFP) also collaborated in various capacities. The situation The eastern and northern parts of Uganda experienced heavy rains during the months of July and September 2007 causing severe flooding which led to the destruction of several infrastructures and farmlands. Soroti, Amuria, Katakwi, Bukedea, Kumi, Lira and Sironko Districts in the two regions were severely affected. The magnitude of the destruction was enormous with 80 percent of crops submerged under the flood waters, roads and bridges washed away and this led the Uganda Government to declare a state of emergency in the affected areas. Uganda Red Cross Society in collaboration with other humanitarian agencies responded to the crisis by providing necessary humanitarian assistance to the affected persons. According to the findings of the assessments conducted by URCS, it was estimated that more than 20,000 households were severely affected and 58,000 people displaced. With about 80 percent of crops destroyed by floods, food insecurity was imminent. Uganda Red Cross Society did an early recovery programme in a bid to assist the floods affected communities. Programme components such as shelter, water and sanitation and food security were started as a mid-term measure to empower communities to recover from the disaster and be prepared for future disasters. Red Cross and Red Crescent action Overview The Uganda Red Cross Society took a lead role in the humanitarian operation among other humanitarian agencies to help save the lives of the most vulnerable floods affected communities. The National Society trained its volunteers in data collection and assessment to identify the most urgent needs of the affected communities, carried out distribution of non food items such as soap, blankets, water containers, kitchen sets, purification sachets, tarpaulins, mosquito nets and family kits. Furthermore the National Society initiated health activities to address cases of malaria and provision of safe clean water benefiting a total of 25,000 households. 2 Emergency relief (food and basic non-food items) Objective: To provide emergency shelter and essential household items to at least 25,000 vulnerable households. Activities planned · Distribution of 20,000 shelter kits for most vulnerable returning communities that have no access to roofing materials. · Distribution of 20,000 kits of household items to vulnerable IDP/returnee households (kit composed of 3 blankets, 2 cooking pot, 2 jerry cans and 3 bars of soap). Achievements To be able to come up with the floods resistant huts during recovery (refer to table 2 below), 10,000 shelter kits were distributed both on individual and communal basis. Individual tools included: hoes, pangas, nails, tape measures, tarpaulins, axes, windows, doors, polythene sheeting, binding wire, wood preservative, nylon fibre, moulds and sisal ropes. While the communal tools that were used on rotation basis with the help of community construction team leaders comprised of wheelbarrows, pickaxes, spades, trowels, hammers, spirit levels, damp levels, sickles and saws. A total of 20,000 kits of household items were distributed in Soroti (Kamuda, Atiira, Kiere, Bugando sub counties), Amuria (Kapelebyong, Obalanga, Acowa, Morungatuny, Orungo sub-counties), Bukedea (Malera) and Katakwi (Magoro, Ngariam, Usuk, Toroma, Kapujan and Katakwi). (See matrix below) HHds Popn. J/cans K/sets F/Kits Tarps Soap Blankets M/nets Buckets Pur/ Aqua Sac tabs Katakwi 5,909 28,153 5,252 493 11,271 596 20,501 15,150 12,139 5,753 128,344 18,720 Bukedea 1,001 4,604 20 0 1,001 980 0 0 1,001 0 0 0 Amuria 12,888 50,713 13,640 1,958 1,338 21,969 44,412 28,862 24,305 9,987 156,900 0 Soroti 1,633 9,540 3,234 1,709 0 2,421 3,133 4,130 3,418 0 0 0 Note: 2 tarpaulins, 6 bars of soap, 3 blankets, 2 jerrycans, 2 mosquito nets and 1 kitchen set were distributed per household. Distribution of these items varied according to the specifications from the different partner societies. Health and care Objective: To contribute to improved health status, health awareness and reduced incidence of waterborne and vector transmitted diseases among at least 20,000 households. Activities planned Immediate: · Deployment of one mass sanitation Emergency Response Unit (ERU) targeting 25 percent of affected population. · Deployment of two water treatment units. · Provision of water purification tablets to 10,000 households. · Production and distribution of 100,000 information, education, communication (IEC) materials such as posters and brochures. · Mass media campaigns for awareness raising; radio spots and talk shows. · Conduct community sensitization and/or awareness sessions. Medium term: · Construction of latrines in selected localities in the community – 800 communal latrines (two stances) within the camps that being used for relocated of the displaced. · Construction of 10 institutional VIP (five stances) latrines at selected strategic sites such as schools, health centres and communities. · Provision of latrine digging kits (pick axes, hoes, spade and nylon rope metallic buckets) for 800 communal latrines construction. · Construction of 400 communal bathing shelters within the traditional
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HIV/AIDS Treatment and Care in a Long-Term Conflict Setting: Observations from the AIDS Support Organization (TASO) in the Teso Region Emma Smith SIT Study Abroad
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Spring 2008 HIV/AIDS Treatment and Care in a Long-Term Conflict Setting: Observations From The AIDS Support Organization (TASO) in the Teso Region Emma Smith SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Recommended Citation Smith, Emma, "HIV/AIDS Treatment and Care in a Long-Term Conflict Setting: Observations From The AIDS Support Organization (TASO) in the Teso Region" (2008). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 99. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/99 This Unpublished Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HIV/AIDS Treatment and Care in a Long-Term Conflict Setting: Observations from The AIDS Support Organization (TASO) in the Teso Region Emma Smith Advisor: Alutia Samuel Academic Directors: Charlotte Mafumbo and Martha Wandera Location: TASO Soroti SIT Uganda Spring 2008 Dedication To all the people living with HIV/AIDS in Teso, who continue to live strongly despite decades of suffering from continuous war, displacement and neglect. May the world come to recognize the struggles that you live with. Acknowledgements There are so many people to whom thanks is owed, it would not be possible to acknowledge them all even if time and space allowed. Primarily, I would like to thank the clients of TASO Soroti, who so willingly welcomed a stranger into their communities and allowed so many questions to be asked of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Soroti Administrative Units
    Ococia OgangaY# i AwoY#jaitoi IY#dia AcY#humet AmaY#rwasi Acede Opot UGANDA Koboko Moyo Kaabong Alere Kitgum Yumbe Kokol Maracha Adjumani Y# Kotido Arua Pader Gulu Abim Amuru Moroto Nebbi N Oyam Lira A SOROTI ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS Amuria Omunyir Balanga Alere Omugei Buliisa Masindi Dokolo Alanyi Y# Y# Y# Apac Y# Katakwi Nakapiripirit W E Kaberamaido Amolatar Abako Soroti Kumi Abongorwot Hoima Kapchorwa Nakasonola Bukedea Bukwa Pallisa Sironko Amugo Nakaseke Kamuli Budaka S Bundibugyo Kaliro Abongoatin AkoromitKiboga Mbale Bududa Kibaale Luwero Achwichwi Aminito Kayunga NamutumbaButaleja Manafwa Iganga Tororo # # Morungatuny Y# Y# Kabarole Kyenjojo Y Y Mityana Apigikwe Mubende Jinja Aco Amugo Kamwenge Busia Kampala Kasese Sembabule Mpigi Wakiso Kiruhura Ojul Ibanda Omee Lyantonde Bugiri Bushenyi Mukono LIRA Masaka Amucu AteusuAmero Mayuge Morungatuny Mbarara Rukungiri Y# Y# Y# Y# Y# Y# Kalangala Olwa Rakai Angorom Kanungu NtungamoIsingiro AMURIA KisoroKabale Ocamonyang Morungatuny Wila Amach Y# NgoraY# Y# Y# Amononeno Mwogo Amilmil Willa Olwa Ogangai Amilmil Alapata Okude OriebaiY# Y# Y# Ojukot Amusus Ajaki Onyakede Ajonyi Orungo Mamuyoga Achwa Batta Y# Y# Y# Y#Amusus Y# Okude Dakum Kuju Akwanga Morungatuny Y#Obyonyo Y# Y# Y# Y# OkutoiY# Y# AyolaY# OmodoiY# Atabu Apeduru Okawo Angorom Apeduru Abata Apapai Omid Orungo Dokolo BataY# Y# Y# Y# Y# Y#Odoon DOKOLO Akyeriau Ogolai Kuju Kuju Amucu Abyenek Omid Moruinera Abiya Akore Oburi Y# Y# Y# Y#Asamuk Y# Y# Aderolong Oloroi Abeko Achomai Achuna ata Amwoma Anyara Akeriau Ochelei Katine Alenga
    [Show full text]
  • KARAMOJA STRATEGIC RESILIENCE ASSESSMENT Final Report AUGUST 2016
    Sanjay Gurung: Mercy Corps KARAMOJA STRATEGIC RESILIENCE ASSESSMENT Final Report AUGUST 2016 Table of Contents List of Acronyms ...................................................................................................................... 4 List of Figures ........................................................................................................................... 5 List of Tables ............................................................................................................................ 5 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 6 Resilience of What? ............................................................................................................................ 6 Resilience to What? ............................................................................................................................ 7 Resilience for Whom? ........................................................................................................................ 7 Resilience Through What? ................................................................................................................. 8 Capacity #1: Increased Capacity to Manage Natural Resources Equitably and Transparently ........ 8 Capacity #2: Increased Access to Products and Services that Reduce Risk .................................... 8 Capacity #3: Increased Access to Financial Services ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UGANDA FLOODS – 9 OCTOBER 2007 Focus on Teso and Bugisu
    SITUATION REPORT Nº 7 – UGANDA FLOODS – 9 OCTOBER 2007 Focus on Teso and Bugisu IGHLIGHTS H § DOWNED BRIDGES AND IMPASSABLE ROADS THREA TEN TO CUT OFF T ESO SUB-REGION § NEW AIR ASSETS ARRIVE IN COUNTRY; BY END OF WEEK THREE HELICOPTERS AND ON E AIRPLANE ARE EXPECTED TO BE OPERATIONAL The information contained in this report has been gathered by the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) from sources including the Government of Uganda, UN agencies, non-governmental organizations and the Red Cross movement. Lango sub-region; Abim, Kaabong, Kotido, Moroto and Nakapiripirit in Karamoja region; Bududa, Bukwo, Kapchorwa, Mbale, Manafwa and Sironko in Bugisu (Elgon) sub-region; and Adjumani, Ar ua, Moyo, Nebbi and Yumbe in West Nile sub-region; as well as Kiboga and Kamuli districts in central Uganda. 4. President Yoweri Museveni declared the country’s first-ever State of Emergency in flood-affected areas of eastern Uganda on 19 September, which was endorsed by Parliament on 25 September. 5. On 5 October, the President addressed participants in a charity walk organized by the Teso Flood Relief Task Force, pledging the Government’s support for the survivors and prioritizing the reconstruction of roads and bridges in the affected region. On 7 October, the President addressed local residents at the Soroti Hotel and toured parts of the affected area. 6. The Government has established a regional presence of the Office of the Prime Minister in Soroti to assist in coordination of the floods response. 7. Current planning for the humanitarian response to Situation Overview the disaster is based on some 50,000 households, or approximately 300,000 people, being affected by the rainfall and associated flooding.
    [Show full text]
  • We Are Refugees in Our Own Homeland": Land Dispossession and Resettlement Challenges in Post-Conflict Eso,T Uganda
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 6-2014 "We are Refugees in Our Own Homeland": Land Dispossession and Resettlement Challenges in Post-Conflict eso,T Uganda Matt Kandel Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/234 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] “We Are Refugees in Our Own Homeland”: Land Dispossession and Resettlement Challenges in Post-Conflict Teso, Uganda By Matthew Kandel A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Anthropology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, the City University of New York 2014 ii This manuscript has been read and accepted by the Graduate Faculty in Cultural Anthropology in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Matt Kandel Date Chair of Examining Committee Donald Robotham Date Executive Officer Gerald Creed Ida Susser Marc Edelman John Collins The City University of New York iii ©2014 Matt Kandel All Rights Reserved iv Abstract “We Are Refugees in Our Own Homeland”: Land Dispossession and Resettlement Challenges in Post-Conflict Teso by Matt Kandel Adviser: Donald Robotham This dissertation is based off of fieldwork that I conducted in post-conflict Teso region in northeastern Uganda from 2012-2013. It focuses primarily on land dispossession and challenges to resettlement.
    [Show full text]
  • Amuria District Local Government Local Action
    AMURIA DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT LOCAL ACTION PLAN TO ADDRESS GENDER BASED VIOLENCE AND OTHER CONFLICTS IN AMURIA DISTRICT 2016-2020 Facilitated by the Coalition for Action on 1325 (CoACT), Global Network for Women Peacebuilders (GNWP) And Teso Women Peace Activists (TEWPA) Funded by Austrian Development Agency 1 ITESO ANTHEM Wu okwe lAkasubAn, edeke pApA idAr iteso KojAi Aipus ka AinApAkin nejAiteso PapA itogogong emorimor pApA iteso KotunAikite iso Ateker nAka iteso EmuriA koliA koliAi EmuriA koliA KojAi Aipuc kainApAkin neji iteso OnidA iteso irA Ateker nebonot KAnonokisi loka buses emorimor PApA emorimor idAr kere ijo iteso Koinono lo ejok lo esAyi Ateker kon EmuriA koliA koliAi EmuriA koliA KojAi Aipuc kainApAkin neji iteso Yesi AtumunAk kere kere luteso Kojenutu cut inonosio luka iteso Ketopoloto oni dA AkeriAnut wok NArAi nA nesi AicA nA esipor Ateker EmuriA koliA koliAi EmuriA koliA Kojai aipuc kainApAkin neji iteso Esange ne (THE END) 2 FORWARD The Government of Uganda commitment to implement the UNSCR 1325 & 1820 and the Goma Declaration as a mechanism of strengthening women’s participation and involvement in the promotion of peace and security in conflict situations for conflict prevention and resolution, eradicating sexual violence in conflict situations is milestone to addressing women issues. The Amuria district Local Action Plan comes in to domesticate the Uganda National Action Plan on UNSCR 1325 &1820 by identifying and addressing issues as they appear on the ground/communities using participatory approach that involves the local communities. By so doing, the district will have ownership of its programs/interventions as they will be integrated in the district local Action plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Councils' Performance and Public Service Delivery in Uganda
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT COUNCILS’ PERFORMANCE AND PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY IN UGANDA MOROTO DISTRICT COUNCIL SCORE-CARD REPORT 2009/2010 Caroline Adoch Robert Emoit Regina Adiaka Paul Ngole 1 ACODE Policy Research Series No. 53, 2011 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COUNCILS’ PERFOMANCE AND PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY IN UGANDA MOROTO DISTRICT COUNCIL SCORE-CARD REPORT 2009/2010 2 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COUNCILS’ PERFOMANCE AND PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY IN UGANDA MOROTO DISTRICT COUNCIL SCORE-CARD REPORT 2009/2010 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COUNCILS’ PERFORMANCE AND PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY IN UGANDA MOROTO DISTRICT COUNCIL SCORE-CARD REPORT 2009/10 Caroline Adoch Robert Emoit Regina Adiaka Paul Ngole i LOCAL GOVERNMENT COUNCILS’ PERFOMANCE AND PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY IN UGANDA MOROTO DISTRICT COUNCIL SCORE-CARD REPORT 2009/2010 Published by ACODE P. O. Box 29836, Kampala Email: [email protected], [email protected] Website: http://www.acode-u.org Citation: Adoch, C., et al. (2011). Local Government Councils’ Performance and Public Service Delivery in Uganda: Moroto District Council Score-Card Report 2009/10. ACODE Policy Research Series, No…, 2011. Kampala. © ACODE 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher. ACODE policy work is supported by generous donations and grants from bilateral donors and charitable foundations. The reproduction or use of this publication for academic or charitable purpose or for purposes of informing public policy is excluded from this restriction. ISBN: 9 789970 070169 ii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COUNCILS’ PERFOMANCE AND PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY IN UGANDA MOROTO DISTRICT COUNCIL SCORE-CARD REPORT 2009/2010 Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Engagement with Climate Change Adaptation in Uganda
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Friis-Hansen, Esbern; Aben, Charles; Okiror, John James; Bashaasha, Bernard; Suubi, Godfrey Research Report Local government engagement with climate change adaptation in Uganda DIIS Report, No. 2015:19 Provided in Cooperation with: Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS), Copenhagen Suggested Citation: Friis-Hansen, Esbern; Aben, Charles; Okiror, John James; Bashaasha, Bernard; Suubi, Godfrey (2015) : Local government engagement with climate change adaptation in Uganda, DIIS Report, No. 2015:19, ISBN 978-87-7605-778-7, Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS), Copenhagen This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/144735 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben
    [Show full text]
  • Rcdf Projects in Amuria District, Uganda
    Rural Communications Development Fund (RCDF) RCDF PROJECTS IN AMURIA DISTRICT, UGANDA M A P O F A M U R IA D IS T R IC T S H O W IN G S U B C O U N T IE S N K a p e l e b yo n g O b a la n g a M o ru n g a tu n y A c o w a K u j u O ru n g o A s a m u k A b a ril e la W e ra 2 0 0 2 0 4 0 K m s UCC Support through the RCDF Programme Uganda Communications Commission Plot 42 -44, Spring road, Bugolobi P.O. Box 7376 Kampala, Uganda Tel: + 256 414 339000/ 312 339000 Fax: + 256 414 348832 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ucc.co.ug 1 Table of Contents 1- Foreword……………………………………………………………….……….………..…..…....……3 2- Background…………………………………….………………………..…………..….….……..……4 3- Introduction………………….……………………………………..…….…………….….…………..4 4- Project profiles……………………………………………………………………….…..…….……...5 5- Stakeholders’ responsibilities………………………………………………….….…........…12 6- Contacts………………..…………………………………………….…………………..…….……….13 List of tables and maps 1- Table showing number of RCDF projects in Amuria district………….…………...5 2- Map of Uganda showing Amuria district………..………………….………...…………..14 10- Map of Amuria district showing sub counties………..………………………………..15 11- Table showing the population o Amuria f district by sub counties…………...15 12- List of RCDF Projects in Amuria district…………………………………….…….……….16 Abbreviations/Acronyms UCC Uganda Communications Commission RCDF Rural Communications Development Fund USF Universal Service Fund MCT Multipurpose Community Tele-centre PPDA Public Procurement and Disposal Act of 2003 POP Internet Points of Presence ICT Information and Communications Technology UA Universal Access MoES Ministry of Education and Sports MoH Ministry of Health DHO District Health Officer CAO Chief Administrative Officer RDC Resident District Commissioner 2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Public Disclosure Authorized Republic of Uganda Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries REGIONAL PASTORAL LIVELIHOOD RESILIENCE PROJECT-RPLRP Public Disclosure Authorized SOCIAL ASSESSMENT Public Disclosure Authorized FINAL REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized October, 2013 i TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................xiii 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Status of livestock production in North-Eastern Districts ..................................................... 1 1.2 Project Description ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Environmental and Social Challenges in the Project Area ............................................................ 4 1.3.1 Project Components ............................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Rational of the Social Assessment ................................................................................................ 5 1.5 Objectives of the Social Impact Assessment ................................................................................. 6 1.6 Study
    [Show full text]
  • Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers 9 Marshalsea Road (4Th Floor) London SE1 1EP United Kingdom
    COALITIONCOALITION TOTO STOPSTOP THETHE USEUSE OFOF CHILDCHILD SOLDIERSSOLDIERS Returning Home Children’s perspectives on reintegration A case study of children abducted by the Lord’s Resistance Army in Teso, eastern Uganda February 2008 Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers 9 Marshalsea Road (4th floor) London SE1 1EP United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)20 7367 4110 Fax: +44 (0)20 7367 4129 E-mail: [email protected] www.child-soldiers.org Front cover: © Jonathan Hyams, Children's dresses made by former child soldiers who are now young mothers. 'Mother Daughter Project', Women's Development Centre, Gulu, Uganda 2006. Acknowledgements We would like to thank the formerly abducted children and youth of Teso who shared their painful experiences in the bush and in the community with us, and who gave so freely and generously of their time in order to help other children. Their ability to recognize and reflect on their strengths as well as their difficulties testifies to their resilience, and is an example to us all. They hope to influence those who will provide future reintegration programs in northern Uganda, and we hope that their voices will be heard. We would also like to thank the key informants who participated in this study, as well as the local professionals who gave direct assistance to this project. In particular, we would like to acknowledge the contribution of Josephine Amaro who co-facilitated the focus groups for the girls. Our thanks to Victoria Forbes Adam, Heloise Ruaudel, Emma de Vise and Linda Dowdney, from the Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers, for their guidance and feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • Cranfield University David Alford Impact and Potential
    CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY DAVID ALFORD IMPACT AND POTENTIAL OF SELF SUPPLY IN AMURIA DISTRICT, UGANDA SCHOOL OF APPLIED SCIENCE MSC WATER MANAGEMENT CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF APPLIED SCIENCE MSC WATER MANAGEMENT Academic Year: 2006/2007 David Alford IMPACT AND POTENTIAL OF SELF SUPPLY IN AMURIA DISTRICT, UGANDA Supervisor: Professor Richard Carter September 2007 This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science © Cranfield University, 2007. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright holder. Abstract In Uganda, 87.7% of the population remain in rural areas (UBOS, 2006). Considerable efforts have been and are being made to reform the water sector and address issues of sustainability in rural areas, nevertheless, the literature suggests that although progress is being made in increasing rural coverage, challenges continue to be faced in achieving the country’s national and international targets (MWE, 2006). The majority of rural water supply initiatives globally focus on communal supplies for groups of between 200 – 500 persons, however, many communities are too geographically scattered, and socially discordant to achieve sustainable management of a given water source (Sutton, 2004a). In addition, the focus of support on communal interventions tends to suppress local initiatives by households and small groups to improve their own situation with regards water. Although greater funding is being channelled to the sector, new approaches are needed if international targets for safe water supply are to be met in rural areas. Supported self- supply is one such approach. By focussing on building a supporting environment, supported self-supply builds on local initiatives, seeking to encourage and improve them.
    [Show full text]