DOCSLIB.ORG

Global Methane Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Global Methane Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities Global Methane Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities Why Target Methane? Methane is the second most abundant anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) after carbon dioxide (CO2), accounting for about 20 percent of global emissions. Methane is considered a “short-term climate forcer,” meaning it has a relatively short lifespan in the atmosphere of approximately 12 years. Though methane is in the atmosphere for a shorter period of time and is emitted in smaller 1 quantities than CO2, its global warming potential (i.e., the ability of the gas to trap heat in the atmosphere) is 28-34 times greater. As a result, methane emissions contributed to about one-third of today’s anthropogenic GHG warming. Methane is emitted during the production and transport of coal, natural gas, and oil. Emissions also result from the decay of organic matter in municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills, some livestock manure storage systems, and certain agro-industrial and municipal wastewater treatment systems. Capturing methane from these sources offers a unique opportunity to mitigate climate change and simultaneously increase energy security, enhance economic growth, and improve air quality and worker safety. Ü Global Methane Emissions Figure 1: Estimated Global Anthropogenic by Sector Methane Emissions by Source, 2020 Rice Cultivation 7% Global anthropogenic methane emissions Stationary & Enteric Fermentation 27% by 2020 are estimated to be 9,390 million Mobile Sources 4% 2 metric tons of CO2 equivalent (MMTCO2E). Biomass 3% Approximately 54 percent of these emissions will come from the five sources Other Ag Sources 5% targeted by the Global Methane Initiative Agriculture (Manure Wastewater 7% (GMI): agriculture (manure management), Management) 3% coal mines, MSW, oil and natural gas systems, and wastewater (see Figure 1). Coal Mining 9% GMI Partner Countries (see www. globalmethane.org for complete list) Municipal Solid represent approximately 70 percent of the Oil & Gas 24% Waste 11% world’s estimated anthropogenic methane emissions. Partner countries’ major methane emission sources vary greatly, and thus the opportunities for methane capture and use in Figure 2: Estimated and Projected Global Anthropogenic each country also vary. Methane Emissions by Source, 2020 and 2030 3000 Ü Global Emissions Projections Enteric Fermentation 2500 Global anthropogenic methane emissions are projected to increase by nearly 9 percent over 2000 anticipated 2020 levels to 10,220 MMTCO2E by Municipal 1500 Solid 2030 (see Figure 2). Waste From 2020 to 2030, the relative proportions of 1000 Wastewater Other Ag the agriculture (manure management), coal Sources Manure mines, and wastewater sectors are projected to 500 Management 1 The fifth report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), released 0 in 2013, included methane GWP values of 28 to 34. The United States and other de- Oil and Coal Rice Stationary Biomass veloped countries are currently using the fourth report’s GWP value of 25 to quantify Gas Mining Cultivation & Mobile -500 the climate impact of U.S.-government-supported methane reduction projects. 2 Unless otherwise noted, all data are from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Estimated 2020 Emissions Projected Added Emissions by 2030 (U.S. EPA’s) Global Anthropogenic Emissions of Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases: 1990–2030 report. www.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/EPAactivities/ EPA_Global_NonCO2_Projections_Dec2012.pdf. Global Methane Initiative 1 www.globalmethane.org remain constant, while emissions from Figure 3: Global Anthropogenic Methane Emissions, 1990 - 2030 MSW and the oil and gas sectors are 6000 expected to increase by approximately one percent of estimated global 5000 anthropogenic methane emissions (see Figure 3). Within each sector, methane 4000 E emissions from agriculture, MSW, 2 and wastewater treatment systems 3000 are expected to increase by 5, 6, and 8 percent respectively. Oil and gas MMTCO 2000 emissions are estimated to increase by 11 percent over current levels. Finally, 1000 emissions associated with coal mines are expected to increase by 17 percent 0 from 2020 to 2030. 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Ü Benefits of Methane Agriculture Coal Mines Municipal Solid Waste Oil & Gas Wastewater Mitigation Cost-effective mitigation technologies leaks, yielding health and safety and practices to address methane benefits while increasing efficiency, The Global Methane Initiative emissions from the largest thus generating increased revenue. anthropogenic sources are already The Global Methane Initiative (GMI) is a For any project, recovering widely available and in use all over voluntary, multilateral partnership that methane provides a local source the world.3 In addition to mitigating aims to reduce global methane emissions of clean energy that can spur climate change, reducing methane economic development and and to advance the abatement, recovery, emissions delivers a host of other displace higher CO - and pollutant- and use of methane as a clean energy energy, health and safety, and 2 intensive energy sources such as source. GMI achieves this goal by creating local environmental benefits. Many wood, coal, and oil. Recovered technologies and practices that an international network of partner methane can also serve as a new reduce methane emissions also governments, private sector members, sustainable and abundant energy reduce emissions of volatile organic development banks, universities and non- source for developing countries. compounds, hazardous air pollutants, governmental organizations to conduct and other local air pollutants. This Ü assessments, build capacity, create yields health benefits for local Overview of Mitigation partnerships, and share information to populations and workers. Because Opportunities facilitate project development for methane methane is an important precursor Many of the currently available of tropospheric ozone, reducing methane mitigation opportunities reduction in GMI Partner Countries. methane also reduces ozone-related involve the recovery and use of More than 1,000 public and private sector health effects. methane as fuel for electricity organizations are members of the GMI generation, onsite uses, or offsite Methane reduction projects at landfills Project Network, and have helped the and wastewater treatment plants gas sales. Specific technologies and program to leverage nearly $600 million also reduce odors; in the agriculture mitigation approaches, however, sector, they control manure, protect vary by emission source because of in investment from private companies and local ecosystems, and reduce odors. their different characteristics and financial institutions. Capturing methane from gassy coal emission processes. The matrix (on mines improves industrial safety by page 3) provides a brief summary reducing the risk of explosions. The use of the mitigation opportunities by of low-emission equipment and better sector, as well as examples of mitigation management practices in oil and technologies from Partner Countries. natural gas systems minimizes methane 3 The Fourth Assessment Report of Working Group III of the IPCC (www.mnp.nl/ipcc/pages_media/AR4-chapters.html) and the U.S. EPA report, Global Mitigation of Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases (www.epa.gov/climatechange/economics/international.html), both contain information on methane mitigation options. Global Methane Initiative 2 www.globalmethane.org Global Methane Proven Mitigation Sources of Methane Mitigation Opportunities Emissions Technologies per Sector* Agriculture (Manure 286 • Covered anaerobic lagoons collect and transmit Management) MMTCO2E lagoon-generated biogas to a dedicated point for transmission to some type of gas use device (e.g., Produced from decomposi- engine). tion of livestock and poultry manure stored or treated • Digesters (e.g., plug flow, complete mix) that compost in systems that promote or “digest” organic waste in the absence of oxygen, anaerobic conditions (e.g., thereby generating methane for collection and use. liquid or slurry in lagoons, For more information from the Agriculture Subcommittee: Floating Dome Anaerobic ponds, tanks, or pits). www.globalmethane.org/agriculture Digester (India) Coal Mines 799 • Degasification, where holes are drilled and the MMTCO2E methane is captured (not vented) in conjunction with Emitted from active and mining operations. abandoned underground mines and surface mines, • Ventilation air methane (VAM) abatement, where and as a result of post- low concentrations of methane are oxidized to mining activities including generate heat for process use and/or electricity coal processing, storage, generation. and transportation. For more information from the Coal Subcommittee: Degasification Pump Station www.globalmethane.org/coal-mines (Ukraine) Municipal Solid Waste 1,077 • Extraction using a series of wells and a vacuum MMTCO2E system, which directs the collected gas to a point to Produced through the be combusted in a flare or utilized for energy (e.g., decomposition of organic electricity generation, boiler, dryers, vehicle fuel). waste under anaerobic conditions typically found For more information from the Municipal Solid Waste in landfills and large dump Subcommittee: www.globalmethane.org/landfills sites. Landfill Gas Well (China) Oil & Gas Systems 2,276 • Technologies or equipment upgrades that reduce or MMTCO E eliminate equipment venting or fugitive emissions. Emitted during normal 2 operations, routine main- • Enhanced management practices that take advan- tenance, and system
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hydrogen Transfer and Activation of Propane and Methane on ZSM5-Based Catalysts
    Catalysis Letters 21 (1993) 55-70 55 Hydrogen transfer and activation of propane and methane on ZSM5-based catalysts Enrique Iglesia 1 and Joseph E. Baumgartner Corporate Research Laboratories, Exxon Research and Engineering, Route 22 East, Annandale, NJ08801, USA Received 12 April 1993; accepted 4 June 1993 Hydrogen exchange between undeuterated and perdeuterated light alkanes (CD4-C3Hs, C3Ds-C3Hs) occurs on H-ZSM5 and on Ga- and Zn-exchanged H-ZSM5 at 773 K. Alkane conversion to aromatics occurs much more slowly because it is limited by rate of disposal of H-atoms formed in C-H scission steps and not by C-H bond activation. Kinetic coupling of these C-H activation steps with hydrogen transfer to acceptor sites (Ga n+, Znm+) and ulti- mately to stoichiometric hydrogen acceptors (H+, CO2, 02, CO) often increases alkane activa- tion rates and the selectivity to unsaturated products. Reactions of 13CH4/C3H8 mixtures at 773 K lead only to unlabelled alkane, alkene, and aromatic products, even though exchange between CD4 and C3H8 occurs at these reaction conditions. This suggests that the non- oxidative conversion of CH4 to higher hydrocarbons on solid acids is limited by elementary steps that occur after the initial activation of C-H bonds. Keywords: Hydrogen transfer; light alkane reactions; deuterium cross-exchange reactions; alkane aromatization 1. Introduction Recent studies suggest that electrophilic activation of light alkanes occurs on superacid catalysts [1] and on Hg-based organometallic complexes [2] at low tem- peratures, and on weaker solid acids at higher temperatures [3-9], apparently via heterolytic cleavage of C-H bonds or intermediate partial oxidation of methane to methanol.
    [Show full text]
  • ITP Chemicals: from Natural Gas to Ethylene Via Methane
    . INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM From Natural Gas to Ethylene via Methane Homologation and Ethane Oxidative Dehydrogenation New catalysts promise higher selectivity, Benefits for Our Industry and Our throughput, and economic competitiveness Nation As an alternative to thermal cracking, Ethylene is an important building block This technique has not yet been implemented oxydehydrogenation will save more than 640 in the production of many common and because of high capital investment in existing trillion British thermal units (Btu) per year commercially important materials, such as equipment and techniques. while reducing emissions of many pollutants. plastics and chemicals. Currently, ethylene is This project seeks to develop catalysts that New ethylene plants will save 50 percent in produced in a highly energy-intensive two-step will enable direct production of ethylene capital costs over plants installing cracking process. Ethane is firstrecovered from natural by the oxydehydrogenation of crude ethane furnaces. gas and refinery streams through catalytic found in natural gas. This exothermic process cracking and hydrocracking processes, and will offer high selectivity and throughput of then it is thermally cracked in the presence of ethylene from ethane-concentrated gas streams steam to produce ethylene. A more efficient in addition to saving energy and reducing Applications in Our Nation’s but not yet commercialized alternative to emissions. It will also lower capital costs this method is catalytic oxydehydrogenation, Industry through the use crude ethane, which is cheaper which directly produces ethylene from crude than ethane purified through other processes. Catalytic oxydehydrogenation will find ethane found in natural gas in a single step. immediate application in the petrochemicals industry, which uses ethylene as a primary O2 feedstock for manufacturing plastics and Ethane- Depleted C B chemicals.
    [Show full text]
  • Central African Republic Overview of Bilateral, Regional, Multilateral, and Global Programs Overview of U.S
    Meeting the Fast Start Commitment U.S. Climate Finance in Fiscal Year 2011 Central African Republic Overview of Bilateral, Regional, Multilateral, and Global Programs Overview of U.S. Fast Start Climate Financing in Fiscal Years 2010 & 2011 n December 2009, President Obama and contribution to fast start financing will also leaders from around the world came include funding from FY 2012. together in Copenhagen at the 15th Consistent with President Obama’s Global IConference of the Parties to the United Nations Development Policy, we are using the full range Framework Convention on Climate Change of mechanisms – bilateral, multilateral, and (UNFCCC) to chart a new course in the global private – to ensure that our climate finance is effort to tackle climate change. The resulting efficient, effective, and innovative; based on Copenhagen Accord reflected - for the first country-owned plans; and focused on achieving time in an international outcome - measurable, measurable results. We are focusing our bilateral reportable and verifiable mitigation targets and efforts on those countries and regions where actions by all major economies, and set out we have a comparative advantage and are new institutions and approaches for adaptation, coordinating closely with other donors. U.S. fast technology and finance. start finance is provided to developing countries The finance outcomes in Copenhagen included through a variety of channels, including: a collective commitment by developed countries Q Congressionally appropriated climate to provide resources to developing countries finance: grant-based assistance through approaching $30 billion in the period 2010- the Global Climate Change Initiative – a 2012. The elements that leaders endorsed in the whole-of-government effort to promote low Copenhagen Accord, including this “fast start” emission, climate resilient economic growth finance commitment, were carried forward in around the world – and additional grant- decisions of the 16th Conference of the Parties in based assistance that delivers significant Cancun in December 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Methane Emissions from Landfills
    Methane Emissions from Landfills Haokai Zhao Advisors: Prof. Nickolas J. Themelis Prof. A.C. (Thanos) Bourtsalas Prof. Wade R. McGillis Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science Columbia University January, 2019 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for M.S. in Earth and Environmental Engineering Research co-sponsored by Methane Emissions from Landfills H. Zhao Executive Summary Methane, one of the main greenhouse gases (GHGs), has been assessed to have 28 times the global warming potential (GWP) of carbon dioxide over a 100-year time horizon in the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills, methane is generated as a product of the anaerobic degradation of organic waste. United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) estimated that, in 2016, landfill methane emissions in the U.S. were approximately 107.7 million tons carbon dioxide equivalent (Mt CO2 e). And globally, it was estimated that methane emissions from landfilling of solid waste were 794.0 million tons of CO2 e in 2005. At both the U.S. and the global levels, landfilling was the third largest source of methane emissions, after enteric fermentation and natural gas & oil systems. A broad range of topics about methane emissions from landfill are covered in this report, including the gas-generating processes in landfill, the theories about modeling landfill gas generation and emission, the developed models and the current estimates of landfill emissions, as well as the calculation and analysis on several aspects: 1) theoretical maximum methane generation per ton of MSW and actual methane emission per ton of MSW; 2) climate zone statistics about landfill gas generation model parameter, landfill methane generation, emission and recovery; 3) the time series of global landfill methane emissions with regional analysis and per capita analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Environlmental ASSESSMENT METHYL CHLORIDE VIA
    DOEEA-1157 ENVIRONlMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHYL CHLORIDE VIA OXYHYDROCHLOFUNATION OF METHANE: A BUILDING BLOCK FOR CHEMICALS AND FUELS FROM NATURAL GAS DOW CORNING CORPORATION CARROLLTON, KENTUCKY SEPTEMBER 1996 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY PITTSBURGH ENERGY TECHNOLOGY CENTER CUM ~~~~~~~~ DOEEA-1157 ENVIRONlMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHYL CHLORIDE VIA OXYHYDROCHLORINATION OF METHANE: A BUILDING BLOCK FOR CHEMICALS AND FUELS FROM NATURAL GAS DOW CORNING CORPORATION CARROLLTON, KENTUCKY SEPTEMBER 1996 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY PITTSBURGH ENERGY TECHNOLOGY CENTER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Image are produced from the best available original document. &E/,Etq --,/s7 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FOR THE PROPOSED METHYL CHLORIDE VIA OXYHYDROCHLORINATION OF METHANE PROJECT AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) SUMMARY: DOE has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1157) for a project proposed by Dow Corning Corporation to demonstrate a novel method for producing methyl chloride (CH,Cl). The project would involve design, construction, and operation of an engineering-scale oxyhydrochlorination (OHC) faci 1 i ty where methane, oxygen, and hydrogen chloride (HC1) would be reacted in a fixed-bed reactor in the presence of highly selective, stable catalysts. Unconverted methane, light hydrocarbons and HC1 would be recovered and recycled back to the OHC reactor. The methyl chloride would be absorbed in a solvent, treated by solvent stripping and then purified by distillation. Testing of the proposed OHC process would be conducted at Dow Corning's production plant in Carrollton, Carroll County, Kentucky, over a 23-month period. Based on the analyses in the EA, the DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as defined by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenhouse Gas Inventory South Africa
    GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY SOUTH 1990 TO AFRICA 2000 COMPILATION UNDER THE NATIONAL UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE (UNFCCC) INVENTORY REPORT MAY 2009 Greenhouse gas inventory South Africa PREFACE This report is the result of work commissioned by the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT) to develop the 2000 national inventory of greenhouse gases (GHGs) for South Africa. Information on energy and industrial processes was prepared by the Energy Research Centre (ERC) of the University of Cape Town, while information on agriculture, land use changes, forestry and waste was provided by the Centre for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR). This report is published by the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, South Africa. An electronic version of the report, along with the Common Reporting Format (CRF) tables, is available on the website of DEAT: http://www.saaqis.org.za/. Information from this report may be reproduced, provided the source is acknowledged. AUTHORS AND CONTRIBUTORS General responsibility: Stanford Mwakasonda (ERC), Rina Taviv (CSIR), Peter Lukey (DEAT) Jongikhaya Witi (DEAT),argot Richardson (DEAT), Tsietsi Mahema (DEAT), Ajay Trikam (ERC). Individual chapters: Summary Stanford Mwakasonda Chapter 1 Stanford Mwakasonda, Stephen Davies (Section 1.5) Chapter 2 Stanford Mwakasonda Chapter 3. Stanford Mwakasonda, Thapelo Letete, Philip Lloyd (section 3.2.1) Chapter 4 Stanford Mwakasonda, Thapelo Letete, Mondli Guma Chapter 5 Rina Taviv, Heidi van Deventer, Bongani Majeke, Sally Archibald Chapter 6 Ndeke Musee Report reviews: Harald Winkler, Marna van der Merwe, Bob Scholes Report compilation: Stanford Mwakasonda, Ajay Trikam Language editor: Robert Berold Quality assurance: TBA i Greenhouse gas inventory South Africa SUMMARY SOUTH AFRICA’S GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORIES In August 1997 the Republic of South Africa joined the majority of countries in the international community in ratifying the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
    [Show full text]
  • Catalytic Reaction of Carbon Dioxide with Methane on Supported Noble Metal Catalysts
    catalysts Review Catalytic Reaction of Carbon Dioxide with Methane on Supported Noble Metal Catalysts András Erd˝ohelyi Institute of Physical Chemistry and Materials Science, University of Szeged, Rerrich Béla tér 1, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary; [email protected]; Tel.: +36-62-343-638; Fax: +36-62-546-482 Abstract: The conversion of CO2 and CH4, the main components of the greenhouse gases, into synthesis gas are in the focus of academic and industrial research. In this review, the activity and stability of different supported noble metal catalysts were compared in the CO2 + CH4 reaction on. It was found that the efficiency of the catalysts depends not only on the metal and on the support but on the particle size, the metal support interface, the carbon deposition and the reactivity of carbon also influences the activity and stability of the catalysts. The possibility of the activation and dissociation of CO2 and CH4 on clean and on supported noble metals were discussed separately. CO2 could dissociate on metal surfaces, this reaction could proceed via the formation of carbonate on the support, or on the metal–support interface but in the reaction the hydrogen assisted dissociation of CO2 was also suggested. The decrease in the activity of the catalysts was generally attributed to carbon deposition, which can be formed from CH4 while others suggest that the source of the surface carbon is CO2. Carbon can occur in different forms on the surface, which can be transformed into each other depending on the temperature and the time elapsed since their formation. Basically, two reaction mechanisms was proposed, according to the mono-functional mechanism the activation of both CO2 and CH4 occurs on the metal sites, but in the bi-functional mechanism the CO2 is activated on the support or on the metal–support interface and the CH on the metal.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHYLENE from METHANE (January 1994)
    Abstract Process Economics Program Report No. 208 ETHYLENE FROM METHANE (January 1994) This report evaluates two routes for the production of ethylene from methane: the direct synthesis based on the oxidative coupling of methane, and the less direct chemistry of converting methanol (which is derived from methane via synthesis gas) in the presence of an aluminophosphate molecular sieve catalyst. Our evaluations indicate that at the present state of development, the economics of both routes are unattractive when compared with the steam pyrolysis of hydrocarbons. We analyze the results of our evaluations to define the technical targets that must be attained for success. We also present a comprehensive technical review that examines not only the two routes evaluated, but also some of the more promising alternative approaches, such as synthesis gas conversion via a modified Fischer-Tropsch process, ethanol synthesis by the homologation of methanol, and ethylene production via methyl chloride. This report will be of interest to petrochemical companies that produce or consume ethylene and to energy-based companies (or equivalent government organizations in various countries) that have access to or control large resources of methane-rich natural gas. PEP’91 SCN CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 2 SUMMARY 2-1 TECHNICAL REVIEW 2-1 Oxidative Coupling 2-1 Methanol Conversion to Ethylene 2-3 Modified Fischer-Tropsch (FT) Process 2-3 Methanol Homologation 2-3 Conversion via Methyl Chloride 2-4 SRI’S PROCESS CONCEPTS 2-4 Ethylene from Methane by Oxidative
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing Methane (CH4) Emissions in Urban Environments (Paris) Sara Defratyka
    Characterizing methane (CH4) emissions in urban environments (Paris) Sara Defratyka To cite this version: Sara Defratyka. Characterizing methane (CH4) emissions in urban environments (Paris). Other. Université Paris-Saclay, 2021. English. NNT : 2021UPASJ002. tel-03230140 HAL Id: tel-03230140 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03230140 Submitted on 19 May 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Characterization of CH4 emissions in urban environments (Paris) Caractérisation des émissions de CH4 en milieu urbain (Paris) Thèse de doctorat de l'université Paris-Saclay École doctorale n° 129 Sciences de l’environnement d’Ile-de-France (SEIF) Spécialité de doctorat: météorologie, océanographie, physique de l’environnement Unité de recherche : Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, CEA, UVSQ, Laboratoire des sciences du climat et de l’environnement Référent : Université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines Thèse présentée et soutenue à Paris-Saclay, le 19/01/2021, par Sara DEFRATYKA Composition du Jury Valéry CATOIRE Professeur des universités,
    [Show full text]
  • A Full Greenhouse Gases Budget of Africa: Synthesis, Uncertainties, and Vulnerabilities
    Biogeosciences, 11, 381–407, 2014 Open Access www.biogeosciences.net/11/381/2014/ doi:10.5194/bg-11-381-2014 Biogeosciences © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License. A full greenhouse gases budget of Africa: synthesis, uncertainties, and vulnerabilities R. Valentini1,2, A. Arneth3, A. Bombelli2, S. Castaldi2,4, R. Cazzolla Gatti1, F. Chevallier5, P. Ciais5, E. Grieco2, J. Hartmann6, M. Henry7, R. A. Houghton8, M. Jung9, W. L. Kutsch10, Y. Malhi11, E. Mayorga12, L. Merbold13, G. Murray-Tortarolo15, D. Papale1, P. Peylin5, B. Poulter5, P. A. Raymond14, M. Santini2, S. Sitch15, G. Vaglio Laurin2,16, G. R. van der Werf17, C. A. Williams18, and R. J. Scholes19 1Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest systems (DIBAF), University of Tuscia, via S. Camillo de Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy 2Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change (CMCC), Via Augusto Imperatore 16, 73100 Lecce, Italy 3Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research, Kreuzeckbahn Str. 19, 82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany 4Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali, Biologiche e Farmaceutiche (DISTABIF), Seconda Università di Napoli, via Vivaldi 43, 81100 Caserta, Italy 5LSCE, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, L’Orme des Merisiers, Bat 701, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France 6Institute for Biogeochemistry and Marine Chemistry, 20146, Hamburg, Germany 7FAO, Forestry Department, UN-REDD Programme, Viale delle terme di Caracalla 1, 00153 Rome, Italy 8Woods Hole Research Center, 149 Woods Hole Road, Falmouth, MA 02540,
    [Show full text]
  • The Methane CO2 Equivalence 1
    Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., 3, 1–29, 2012 www.earth-syst-dynam-discuss.net/3/1/2012/ Earth System doi:10.5194/esdd-3-1-2012 Dynamics ESDD © Author(s) 2012. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Discussions 3, 1–29, 2012 This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Earth System The methane CO Dynamics (ESD). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ESD if available. 2 equivalence O. Boucher Comparison of physically- and Title Page Abstract Introduction economically-based CO2-equivalences for methane Conclusions References Tables Figures O. Boucher J I Laboratoire de Met´ eorologie´ Dynamique, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace, UMR8539, CNRS – Universite´ Pierre et Marie Curie, 4 place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France J I Received: 4 January 2012 – Accepted: 9 January 2012 – Published: 13 January 2012 Back Close Correspondence to: O. Boucher ([email protected]) Full Screen / Esc Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. Printer-friendly Version Interactive Discussion 1 Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Abstract ESDD There is a controversy on the role methane (and other short-lived species) should play in climate mitigation policies and no consensus on what an optimal methane 3, 1–29, 2012 CO2-equivalence should be. We revisit this question by discussing the relative mer- 5 its of physically-based (i.e. Global Warming Potential or GWP and Global Temperature The methane CO2 change Potential or GTP) and socio-economically-based climate metrics. To this effect equivalence we use a simplified Global Damage Potential (GDP) that was introduced by earlier au- O.
    [Show full text]
  • Methane Emissions in the United States: Sources, Solutions & Opportunities for Reductions
    Methane Emissions in the United States: Sources, Solutions & Opportunities for Reductions May 23, 2019 Presentation Overview • U.S. methane emissions & sources • Why methane matters • Methane mitigation by emission source • Spotlight on Renewable Natural Gas • Helpful tools and resources 2 U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emission Sources Source: Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2017 3 2017 U.S. Methane Emissions, by Source Other Coal Mining 38.3 MMTCO2e 55.7 MMTCO2e Coal Mining 8% Wastewater Treatment 14.2 MMTCO2e Oil and Natural Gas Systems 31% Landfills 107.7 MMTCO2e Oil and Natural Total Methane Gas Systems Agriculture 36% Emissions 203.3 MMTCO2e 656.3 MMTCO2e Waste 19% Enteric Fermentation Other 6% 175.4 MMTCO2e Manure Management 61.7 MMTCO2e Source: Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2017 4 Why Methane Matters Positive Outcomes of Capturing and Using Methane Methane Emissions Better air and water quality Trap 28 times more Methane Mitigation heat than carbon dioxide over 100 years Improved human health Opportunity to capture Contribute to ground- and convert methane Increased worker safety level ozone pollution to useful energy Enhanced energy security Create industrial safety problem Economic growth Reduced odors 5 Methane Mitigation by Emission Source • Coal Mines • Oil and Natural Gas Systems • Agriculture (Manure Management and Enteric Fermentation) • Waste (Wastewater Treatment and Landfills) 6 8% 55.7 MMTCO2e Coal Mines Total 656.3 Methane is released from MMTCO2e coal and surrounding rock ▪ Coal strata due to mining activities. In abandoned mines and surface mines, methane might also escape to the atmosphere through natural fissures or other diffuse sources.
    [Show full text]